First Order vs Second Order Transitions in Quantum Magnets I. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions:...

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 3 Sep 2008 I. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Experiments ■ Itinerant ferromagnets whose T c can be tuned to zero:

Citation preview

First Order vs Second Order First Order vs Second Order Transitions in Quantum Transitions in Quantum

MagnetsMagnets

I. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Experiments

II. Theory 1. Conventional (mean-field) theory 2. Renormalized mean-field theory 3. Effects of flucuations

III. Other Transitions

Dietrich Belitz, University of Oregon

Ted Kirkpatrick, University of Maryland

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 2Sep 2008

I. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Experiments

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 3Sep 2008

I. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Experiments

■ Itinerant ferromagnets whose Tc can be tuned to zero:

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 4Sep 2008

I. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Experiments

■ Itinerant ferromagnets whose Tc can be tuned to zero:

● UGe2, ZrZn2, (MnSi) (clean, pressure tuned)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 5Sep 2008

I. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Experiments

■ Itinerant ferromagnets whose Tc can be tuned to zero:

● UGe2, ZrZn2, (MnSi) (clean, pressure tuned)

○ Clean materials all show tricritical point, with 2nd order transition

at high T, 1st order transition at low T:

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 6Sep 2008

I. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Experiments

■ Itinerant ferromagnets whose Tc can be tuned to zero:

● UGe2, ZrZn2, (MnSi) (clean, pressure tuned)

○ Clean materials all show tricritical point, with 2nd order transition

at high T, 1st order transition at low T:

(Pfleiderer & Huxley 2002)

UGe2

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 7Sep 2008

I. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Experiments

■ Itinerant ferromagnets whose Tc can be tuned to zero:

● UGe2, ZrZn2, (MnSi) (clean, pressure tuned)

○ Clean materials all show tricritical point, with 2nd order transition

at high T, 1st order transition at low T:

(Pfleiderer & Huxley 2002)

UGe2 ZrZn2

(Uhlarz et al 2004)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 8Sep 2008

I. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Experiments

■ Itinerant ferromagnets whose Tc can be tuned to zero:

● UGe2, ZrZn2, (MnSi) (clean, pressure tuned)

○ Clean materials all show tricritical point, with 2nd order transition

at high T, 1st order transition at low T:

(Pfleiderer & Huxley 2002)

UGe2 ZrZn2 MnSi

(Pfleiderer et al 1997)

(Uhlarz et al 2004)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 9Sep 2008

I. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Experiments

■ Itinerant ferromagnets whose Tc can be tuned to zero:

● UGe2, ZrZn2, (MnSi) (clean, pressure tuned)

○ Clean materials all show tricritical point, with 2nd order transition

at high T, 1st order transition at low T:

○ Additional evidence: μSR (Uemura et al 2007)

(Pfleiderer & Huxley 2002)

UGe2 ZrZn2 MnSi

(Pfleiderer et al 1997)

(Uhlarz et al 2004)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 10Sep 2008

I. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: ExperimentsI. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Experiments

■■ Itinerant ferromagnets whose TItinerant ferromagnets whose Tc c can be tuned to zero:can be tuned to zero:

● ● UGeUGe22, ZrZn, ZrZn22, (MnSi) (clean, pressure tuned), (MnSi) (clean, pressure tuned)

○ T=0 1st order transition persists in a B-field, ends at quantum critical point.

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 11Sep 2008

I. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: ExperimentsI. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Experiments

■■ Itinerant ferromagnets whose TItinerant ferromagnets whose Tc c can be tuned to zero:can be tuned to zero:

● ● UGeUGe22, ZrZn, ZrZn22, (MnSi) (clean, pressure tuned), (MnSi) (clean, pressure tuned)

○ T=0 1st order transition persists in a B-field, ends at quantum critical point.

Schematic phase diagram:

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 12Sep 2008

I. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: ExperimentsI. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Experiments

■■ Itinerant ferromagnets whose TItinerant ferromagnets whose Tc c can be tuned to zero:can be tuned to zero:

● URu2-xRexSi2 (disordered, concentration tuned)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 13Sep 2008

I. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: ExperimentsI. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Experiments

■■ Itinerant ferromagnets whose TItinerant ferromagnets whose Tc c can be tuned to zero:can be tuned to zero:

● URu2-xRexSi2 (disordered, concentration tuned)

○ Disordered material shows a 2nd order transition down to T=0:

Bauer et al (2005)

Butch & Maple (2008)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 14Sep 2008

I. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: ExperimentsI. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Experiments

■■ Itinerant ferromagnets whose TItinerant ferromagnets whose Tc c can be tuned to zero:can be tuned to zero:

● URu2-xRexSi2 (disordered, concentration tuned)

○ Disordered material shows a 2nd order transition down to T=0:

Bauer et al (2005)

Butch & Maple (2008)

○ Observed exponents are not mean-field like (see below)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 15Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

1. Conventional (= mean-field) theory■ Hertz 1976: Mean-field theory correctly describes T=0 transition for d>1 in clean systems, and for d>0 in disordered ones.

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 16Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

1. Conventional (= mean-field) theory■ Hertz 1976: Mean-field theory correctly describes T=0 transition for d>1 in clean systems, and for d>0 in disordered ones.

■ Landau free energy density: f = f0 – h m + t m2 + u m4 + w m6

Equation of state: h = t m + u m3 + w m5 + …

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 17Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

1. Conventional (= mean-field) theory■ Hertz 1976: Mean-field theory correctly describes T=0 transition for d>1 in clean systems, and for d>0 in disordered ones.

■ Landau free energy density: f = f0 – h m + t m2 + u m4 + w m6

Equation of state: h = t m + u m3 + w m5 + …

■ Landau theory predicts: ● 2nd order transition at t=0 if u<0

● 1st order transition if u<0

} for both clean anddirty systems

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 18Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

1. Conventional (= mean-field) theory■ Hertz 1976: Mean-field theory correctly describes T=0 transition for d>1 in clean systems, and for d>0 in disordered ones.

■ Landau free energy density: f = f0 – h m + t m2 + u m4 + w m6

Equation of state: h = t m + u m3 + w m5 + …

■ Landau theory predicts: ● 2nd order transition at t=0 if u<0

● 1st order transition if u<0

■ Sandeman et al 2003, Shick et al 2004: Band structure in UGe2 u<0

} for both clean anddirty systems

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 19Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

1. Conventional (= mean-field) theory■ Hertz 1976: Mean-field theory correctly describes T=0 transition for d>1 in clean systems, and for d>0 in disordered ones.

■ Landau free energy density: f = f0 – h m + t m2 + u m4 + w m6

Equation of state: h = t m + u m3 + w m5 + …

■ Landau theory predicts: ● 2nd order transition at t=0 if u<0

● 1st order transition if u<0

■ Sandeman et al 2003, Shick et al 2004: Band structure in UGe2 u<0

■ Problems: ● Not universal ● Does not explain the tricritical point ● Observed critical behavior not mean-field like

} for both clean anddirty systems

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 20Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

1. Conventional (= mean-field) theory■ Hertz 1976: Mean-field theory correctly describes T=0 transition for d>1 in clean systems, and for d>0 in disordered ones.

■ Landau free energy density: f = f0 – h m + t m2 + u m4 + w m6

Equation of state: h = t m + u m3 + w m5 + …

■ Landau theory predicts: ● 2nd order transition at t=0 if u<0

● 1st order transition if u<0

■ Sandeman et al 2003, Shick et al 2004: Band structure in UGe2 u<0

■ Problems: ● Not universal ● Does not explain the tricritical point ● Observed critical behavior not mean-field like

■ Conclusion: Conventional theory not viable

} for both clean anddirty systems

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 21Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory■ Hertz theory misses effects of soft p-h excitations (TRK & DB 1996 ff)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 22Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory■ Hertz theory misses effects of soft p-h excitations (TRK & DB 1996 ff) ● Soft modes (clean case)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 23Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory■ Hertz theory misses effects of soft p-h excitations (TRK & DB 1996 ff) ● Soft modes (clean case)

● Contribution to f0:

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 24Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory■ Hertz theory misses effects of soft p-h excitations (TRK & DB 1996 ff) ● Soft modes (clean case)

● Contribution to f0:

● Contribution to eq. of state:

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 25Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory■ Hertz theory misses effects of soft p-h excitations (TRK & DB 1996 ff) ● Soft modes (clean case)

● Contribution to f0:

● Contribution to eq. of state:

● Renormalized mean-field equation of state:

(clean, d=3, T=0)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 26Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory■ In general, Hertz theory misses effects of soft modes (TRK & DB 1996 ff) ● Soft modes (clean case)

● Contribution to f0:

● Contribution to eq. of state:

● Renormalized mean-field equation of state:

(clean, d=3, T=0)

● v>0 Transition is generically 1st order! (TRK, T Vojta, DB 1999)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 27Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory2. Renormalized mean-field theory ● T>0 gives soft p-h excitations a mass ln m -> ln (m+T) tricritical point

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 28Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory2. Renormalized mean-field theory ● T>0 gives soft p-h excitations a mass ln m -> ln (m+T) tricritical point ● Quenched disorder G changes

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 29Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory2. Renormalized mean-field theory ● T>0 gives soft p-h excitations a mass ln m -> ln (m+T) tricritical point ● Quenched disorder G changes ○ fermion dispersion relation md -> md/2

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 30Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory2. Renormalized mean-field theory ● T>0 gives soft p-h excitations a mass ln m -> ln (m+T) tricritical point ● Quenched disorder G changes ○ fermion dispersion relation md -> md/2

○ sign of the coefficient

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 31Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory2. Renormalized mean-field theory ● T>0 gives soft p-h excitations a mass ln m -> ln (m+T) tricritical point ● Quenched disorder G changes ○ fermion dispersion relation md -> md/2

○ sign of the coefficient

Renormalized mean-field equation of state:

(disordered, d=3, T=0)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 32Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory2. Renormalized mean-field theory ● T>0 gives soft p-h excitations a mass ln m -> ln (m+T) tricritical point ● Quenched disorder G changes ○ fermion dispersion relation md -> md/2

○ sign of the coefficient

Renormalized mean-field equation of state:

(disordered, d=3, T=0)

● v>0 Transition is 2nd order with non-mean-field (and non-classical) exponents: β=2, δ=3/2, etc.

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 33Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory2. Renormalized mean-field theory ● Phase diagrams:

G=0

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 34Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory2. Renormalized mean-field theory ● Phase diagrams:

G=0 T=0

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 35Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory2. Renormalized mean-field theory● External field h produces tricritical wings: (DB, TRK, J. Rollbühler 2005)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 36Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory2. Renormalized mean-field theory● External field h produces tricritical wings: (DB, TRK, J. Rollbühler 2005)● h>0 gives soft modes a mass, ln m -> ln (m+h) Hertz theory works!

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 37Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory2. Renormalized mean-field theory● External field h produces tricritical wings: (DB, TRK, J. Rollbühler 2005)● h>0 gives soft modes a mass, ln m -> ln (m+h) Hertz theory works! Mean-field exponents: β=1/2, δ=3, z=3

Magnetization at QCP: δmc ~ -T4/9

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 38Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory2. Renormalized mean-field theory● External field h produces tricritical wings: (DB, TRK, J. Rollbühler 2005)● h>0 gives soft modes a mass, ln m -> ln (m+h) Hertz theory works! Mean-field exponents: β=1/2, δ=3, z=3

Magnetization at QCP: δmc ~ -T4/9

■ Conclusion: Renormalized mean-field theory explains the experimentally observed phase diagram:

(Pfleiderer, Julian,

Lonzarich 2001)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 39Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory2. Renormalized mean-field theory● External field h produces tricritical wings: (DB, TRK, J. Rollbühler 2005)● h>0 gives soft modes a mass, ln m -> ln (m+h) Hertz theory works! Mean-field exponents: β=1/2, δ=3, z=3

Magnetization at QCP: δmc ~ -T4/9

■ Conclusion: Renormalized mean-field theory explains the experimentally observed phase diagram: ■ Remarks: ● Landau theory with a TCP also produces tricritical wings (Griffiths 1970)

(Pfleiderer, Julian,

Lonzarich 2001)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 40Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory2. Renormalized mean-field theory● External field h produces tricritical wings: (DB, TRK, J. Rollbühler 2005)● h>0 gives soft modes a mass, ln m -> ln (m+h) Hertz theory works! Mean-field exponents: β=1/2, δ=3, z=3

Magnetization at QCP: δmc ~ -T4/9

■ Conclusion: Renormalized mean-field theory explains the experimentally observed phase diagram: ■ Remarks: ● Landau theory with a TCP also produces tricritical wings (Griffiths 1970) ● So far no OP fluctuations have been considered

(Pfleiderer, Julian,

Lonzarich 2001)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 41Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

2. Renormalized mean-field theory2. Renormalized mean-field theory● External field h produces tricritical wings: (DB, TRK, J. Rollbühler 2005)● h>0 gives soft modes a mass, ln m -> ln (m+h) Hertz theory works! Mean-field exponents: β=1/2, δ=3, z=3

Magnetization at QCP: δmc ~ -T4/9

■ Conclusion: Renormalized mean-field theory explains the experimentally observed phase diagram: ■ Remarks: ● Landau theory with a TCP also produces tricritical wings (Griffiths 1970) ● So far no OP fluctuations have been considered ● More generally, Hertz theory works if field conjugate the OP does not change the soft-mode spectrum (DB, TRK, T Vojta 2002)

(Pfleiderer, Julian,

Lonzarich 2001)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 42Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations■ Complete theory: Keep all soft modes explicitly:

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 43Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations■ Complete theory: Keep all soft modes explicitly: ● OP fluctuations m(x,Ω) p-h fluctuations

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 44Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations■ Complete theory: Keep all soft modes explicitly: ● OP fluctuations m(x,Ω) p-h fluctuations

● two divergent time scales: ○ critical time scale z=3 (clean) or z=4 (disordered)

○ fermionic time scale z=1 (clean) or z=2 (disordered)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 45Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations■ Complete theory: Keep all soft modes explicitly: ● OP fluctuations m(x,Ω) p-h fluctuations

● two divergent time scales: ○ critical time scale z=3 (clean) or z=4 (disordered)

○ fermionic time scale z=1 (clean) or z=2 (disordered)

● Construct coupled field theory for both fields (DB, TRK, S.L. Sessions, M.T. Mercaldo 2001)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 46Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations■ Complete theory: Keep all soft modes explicitly: ● OP fluctuations m(x,Ω) p-h fluctuations

● two divergent time scales: ○ critical time scale z=3 (clean) or z=4 (disordered)

○ fermionic time scale z=1 (clean) or z=2 (disordered)

● Construct coupled field theory for both fields (DB, TRK, S.L. Sessions, M.T. Mercaldo 2001)

● Analysis at various levels:

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 47Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations■ Complete theory: Keep all soft modes explicitly: ● OP fluctuations m(x,Ω) p-h fluctuations

● two divergent time scales: ○ critical time scale z=3 (clean) or z=4 (disordered)

○ fermionic time scale z=1 (clean) or z=2 (disordered)

● Construct coupled field theory for both fields (DB, TRK, S.L. Sessions, M.T. Mercaldo 2001)

● Analysis at various levels: ○ Gaussian approx Hertz theory (FP unstable with respect to m q2 term in effective action)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 48Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations■ Complete theory: Keep all soft modes explicitly: ● OP fluctuations m(x,Ω) p-h fluctuations

● two divergent time scales: ○ critical time scale z=3 (clean) or z=4 (disordered)

○ fermionic time scale z=1 (clean) or z=2 (disordered)

● Construct coupled field theory for both fields (DB, TRK, S.L. Sessions, M.T. Mercaldo 2001)

● Analysis at various levels: ○ Gaussian approx Hertz theory (FP unstable with respect to m q2 term in effective action) ○ mean-field approx for OP + Gaussian approx for fermions renormalized mean-field theory (FP marginally unstable)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 49Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations3. Order-parameter fluctuations○ RG analysis for disordered case upper critical dimension is d=4 m q2 is marginal for all 0<d<4, and is the only marginal term

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 50Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations3. Order-parameter fluctuations○ RG analysis for disordered case upper critical dimension is d=4 m q2 is marginal for all 0<d<4, and is the only marginal term log terms in critical behavior (cf. Wegner 1970s) e.g., correlation length

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 51Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations3. Order-parameter fluctuations○ RG analysis for disordered case upper critical dimension is d=4 m q2 is marginal for all 0<d<4, and is the only marginal term log terms in critical behavior (cf. Wegner 1970s) e.g., correlation length

○ 4-ε expansion does not work! Flow eqs depend singularly on the subdominant time scale:

where w = ratio of time scales

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 52Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations3. Order-parameter fluctuations○ RG analysis for disordered case upper critical dimension is d=4 m q2 is marginal for all 0<d<4, and is the only marginal term log terms in critical behavior (cf. Wegner 1970s) e.g., correlation length

○ 4-ε expansion does not work! Flow eqs depend singularly on the subdominant time scale:

where w = ratio of time scales

NB: One-loop (or any finite-loop) order yields misleading results Infinite resummation logs

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 53Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations3. Order-parameter fluctuations○ Comparison with experiments:

Butch & Maple (2008)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 54Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations3. Order-parameter fluctuations○ Comparison with experiments: ▫ δ close to 3/2, effectively x-dependent agrees with theory! (3/2 + logs)

Butch & Maple (2008)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 55Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations3. Order-parameter fluctuations○ Comparison with experiments: ▫ δ close to 3/2, effectively x-dependent agrees with theory! (3/2 + logs) ▫ γ → 0, x-over to 1st order?? (Should go the other way: 1st to 2nd !)

Butch & Maple (2008)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 56Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations3. Order-parameter fluctuations○ Comparison with experiments: ▫ δ close to 3/2, effectively x-dependent agrees with theory! (3/2 + logs) ▫ γ → 0, x-over to 1st order?? (Should go the other way: 1st to 2nd !) ▫ β ≈ 0.8 with no x-dependence, ??

Butch & Maple (2008)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 57Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations3. Order-parameter fluctuations○ Comparison with experiments: ▫ δ close to 3/2, effectively x-dependent agrees with theory! (3/2 + logs) ▫ γ → 0, x-over to 1st order?? (Should go the other way: 1st to 2nd !) ▫ β ≈ 0.8 with no x-dependence, ??

○ Needed: ▫ Analysis of width of asymptotic region ▫ Analysis of x-overs to pre-asymptotic region, and to clean behavior

Butch & Maple (2008)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 58Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations3. Order-parameter fluctuations○ RG analysis for clean case upper critical dimension is d=3

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 59Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations3. Order-parameter fluctuations○ RG analysis for clean case upper critical dimension is d=3 ○ 3-ε expansion to 1-loop order suggests 2nd order transition is possible in certain parameter regimes (fluctuation-induced 2nd order: u driven negative is counteracted by couplings at loop level).

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 60Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

3. Order-parameter fluctuations3. Order-parameter fluctuations○ RG analysis for clean case upper critical dimension is d=3 ○ 3-ε expansion to 1-loop order suggests 2nd order transition is possible in certain parameter regimes (fluctuation-induced 2nd order: u driven negative is counteracted by couplings at loop level). This analysis is suspect due to the problems with the ε-expansion! More work is needed.

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 61Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

4. Summary of quantum ferromagnetic transitions■ Renormalized mean-field theory explains the phase diagram, and the qualitative disorder dependence (1st vs 2nd order)..

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 62Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

4. Summary of quantum ferromagnetic transitions■ Renormalized mean-field theory explains the phase diagram, and the qualitative disorder dependence (1st vs 2nd order).■ External magnetic field restores QCP in clean case. Here, Hertz theory works!

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 63Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

4. Summary of quantum ferromagnetic transitions■ Renormalized mean-field theory explains the phase diagram, and the qualitative disorder dependence (1st vs 2nd order).■ External magnetic field restores QCP in clean case. Here, Hertz theory works!■ For disordered systems, exotic critical behavior is predicted. Experiments are now available, analysis is needed!

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 64Sep 2008

II. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: TheoryII. Quantum Ferromagnetic Transitions: Theory

4. Summary of quantum ferromagnetic transitions■ Renormalized mean-field theory explains the phase diagram, and the qualitative disorder dependence (1st vs 2nd order).■ External magnetic field restores QCP in clean case. Here, Hertz theory works!■ For disordered systems, exotic critical behavior is predicted. Experiments are now available, analysis is needed!■ Role of fluctuations in clean systems needs to be investigated.

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 65Sep 2008

III. Some Other Transitions1. Metamagnetic transitions

.■ Some quantum FMs show metamagnetic transitions:

● UGe2 (Pfleiderer & Huxley 2002)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 66Sep 2008

III. Some Other Transitions1. Metamagnetic transitions

.■ Some quantum FMs show metamagnetic transitions:

● UGe2 (Pfleiderer & Huxley 2002)

● Sr3Ru2O7 (e.g., Grigera et al 2004) (“hidden order”)

Possibly a Pomeranchuk instability (Ho & Schofield 2008)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 67Sep 2008

III. Some Other Transitions1. Metamagnetic transitions

.■ Some quantum FMs show metamagnetic transitions:

● UGe2 (Pfleiderer & Huxley 2002)

● Sr3Ru2O7 (e.g., Grigera et al 2004) (“hidden order”)

Possibly a Pomeranchuk instability (Ho & Schofield 2008)

■ Another example of a restored ferromagnetic QCP: Critical behavior at a ○ metamagnetic end point.

Is Hertz theory valid? (magnons!)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 68Sep 2008

III. Some Other TransitionsIII. Some Other Transitions2. Partial order transition in MnSi

.■ MnSi is a weak helimagnet with a complicated phase diagram

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 69Sep 2008

III. Some Other TransitionsIII. Some Other Transitions2. Partial order transition in MnSi

.■ MnSi is a weak helimagnet with a complicated phase diagram

■ Some features can be explained by approximating MnSi as a FM, while others cannot. Neutron scattering shows “partial order” in the PM phase (Pfleiderer et al 2006, Uemura et al 2007):

• Magnetic state is a helimagnet with

2π/q ≈ 180 Ǻ, pinning in (111) direction

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 70Sep 2008

III. Some Other TransitionsIII. Some Other Transitions2. Partial order transition in MnSi

.■ MnSi is a weak helimagnet with a complicated phase diagram

■ Some features can be explained by approximating MnSi as a FM, while others cannot. Neutron scattering shows “partial order” in the PM phase:

• Short-ranged helical order persists in the paramagnetic phase below a temperature T0(p).

Pitch little changed, but axis orientation much more isotropic than in the ordered phase. Slow dynamics.

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 71Sep 2008

III. Some Other TransitionsIII. Some Other Transitions2. Partial order transition in MnSi

.■ MnSi is a weak helimagnet with a complicated phase diagram

■ Some features can be explained by approximating MnSi as a FM, while others cannot. Neutron scattering shows “partial order” in the PM phase:

•No detectable helical order for T > T0 (p)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 72Sep 2008

III. Some Other TransitionsIII. Some Other Transitions2. Partial order transition in MnSi

.■ Theory: Chiral OP

in analogy to the theory of Blue Phase III or Blue Fog in liquid crystals

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 73Sep 2008

III. Some Other TransitionsIII. Some Other Transitions2. Partial order transition in MnSi

.■ Theory: Chiral OP

in analogy to the theory of Blue Phase III or Blue Fog in liquid crystals

1st order transition from a chiral gas

(PM phase) to a chiral liquid (partial order

phase, “blue quantum fog”)

(S. Tewari, DB, TRK 2006)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 74Sep 2008

III. Some Other TransitionsIII. Some Other Transitions2. Partial order transition in MnSi

.■ Theory: Chiral OP

in analogy to the theory of Blue Phase III or Blue Fog in liquid crystals

1st order transition from a chiral gas

(PM phase) to a chiral liquid (partial order

phase, “blue quantum fog”)

(S. Tewari, DB, TRK 2006)

■ Alternative explanations: Analogies to crystalline blue phases

(Binz et al 2006, Fischer, Shah, Rosch 2008)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 75Sep 2008

III. Some Other TransitionsIII. Some Other Transitions3. Quantum critical point in an inhomogeneous ferromagnet

.■ Consider a FM with a linearly position dependent electron density (can be achieved by bending a metallic plate)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 76Sep 2008

III. Some Other TransitionsIII. Some Other Transitions3. Quantum critical point in an inhomogeneous ferromagnet

.■ Consider a FM with a linearly position dependent electron density (can be achieved by bending a metallic plate)

■ Magnetization is inhomogeneous, but goes to zero uniformly at a QCP (DB, TRK, R. Saha 2007):

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 77Sep 2008

III. Some Other TransitionsIII. Some Other Transitions3. Quantum critical point in an inhomogeneous ferromagnet

.■ Consider a FM with a linearly position dependent electron density (can be achieved by bending a metallic plate)

■ Magnetization is inhomogeneous, but goes to zero uniformly at a QCP (DB, TRK, R. Saha 2007):

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 78Sep 2008

III. Some Other TransitionsIII. Some Other Transitions3. Quantum critical point in an inhomogeneous ferromagnet

.■ Consider a FM with a linearly position dependent electron density (can be achieved by bending a metallic plate)

■ Magnetization is inhomogeneous, but goes to zero uniformly at a QCP (DB, TRK, R. Saha 2007):

■ NB: Mean-field exponents (another example where Hertz theory works!)

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 79Sep 2008

III. Some Other TransitionsIII. Some Other Transitions3. Quantum critical point in an inhomogeneous ferromagnet

.■ Consider a FM with a linearly position dependent electron density (can be achieved by bending a metallic plate)

■ Magnetization is inhomogeneous, but goes to zero uniformly at a QCP (DB, TRK, R. Saha 2007):

■ NB: Mean-field exponents (another example where Hertz theory works!)

■ Open problem: Non-equilibrium behavior

Quantum Criticality Workshop Toronto 80Sep 2008

Acknowledgments• Ted Kirkpatrick• Maria-Teresa Mercaldo• Rajesh Narayanan• Jörg Rollbühler• Achim Rosch• Ronojoy Saha• Sharon Sessions• Sumanta Tewari

• John Toner• Thomas Vojta

• Peter Böni• Christian Pfleiderer

• Aspen Center for Physics

• KITP at UCSB

• Lorentz Center Leiden

National Science Foundation

Recommended