View
217
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Facilities Planning
Committee ForumApril 21, 2017
9:30-11:00
Horticulture 5005
Agenda
Welcome
Facilities Planning Committee
2016-17 Members
2017 Draft Space Plan Presentation Suniya Malhotra, Steinberg
Feedback and Questions
Facilities Planning Committee
2016-17 Membership
Victoria Lewis, Vice President, Administrative Services (Chair)
Kathie Welch, Vice President, Instruction
John Graulty, Dean, Visual, Applied and Performing Arts
Graciano Mendoza, Director, Business Services
Joe Nugent, Director, Facilities Planning and Plant Operations
Spring Andrews, Director, Information Technology
Michael Robins, Director, Purchasing, Contracts and Risk Management
Karen Groppi, Faculty Representative appointed by Faculty Senate
David King, Faculty Representative appointed by Faculty Senate
Denis Lim, Faculty Representative appointed by Faculty Senate
Alta Northcutt, Classified Staff Representative appointed by CCEU
Nikki Oneto, Classified Staff Representative appointed by CCEU
Eric Rose, Student appointed by Student Senate
Setting Context for the
2017 Space Plan
The Plan is . . . The Plan is not . . .
based on the interviews conducted
with Deans, Department Chairs,
staff and students.
Funded.
a long-term vision based on current
and anticipated needs for space.
Cost estimates have not been
developed for the plan.
flexible. Facilities and IT infrastructure
needs have not been included
Notes:
• The 2017 Draft Space Plan replaces the 2007 Space Plan
• The projects are not prioritized. Criteria to prioritize projects to be developed.
• The implementation of the plan will be phased in over time as funding becomes available.
Next steps:
Accepting feedback on the recommendations
Contact constituent representatives/committee
members
The 5/6/17 FPC-Tech Committee meeting will review
feedback to date
The 6/5/17 Board of Trustees will have a study
session at 4:00 pm in Sesnon House. Board Action to
follow.
FACILITIES SPACE PLANNING UPDATE | MAY 2017
DRAFT Space Plan Addendum to Facilities Master Plan (FMP)
CABRILLO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
This plan replaces the 2007 Space Plan
Agenda
• Timeline• Task One Data Analysis & Data Collection Refresh• Task Two Proposed Space Plan Review and Discussion
| Page 1
2016-2017 Space Plan Timeline
| Page 2
| Page 3
Task One Summary: Data Analysis
| Page 4
Task One Summary: Data Analysis
| Page 5
Task One Summary: Data Analysis
| Page 6
Task One Summary: Data Analysis
Task One Summary: Data Analysis
| Page 7
| Page 8
Task One Summary: Data Collection
| Page 9
Task One Summary: Data Collection
| Page 10
Task One Summary: Data Collection
Task One Summary: Data Collection
| Page 11
Task Two: Space NeedsIdentified through Task One extensive Stakeholder Feedback in Fall 2016
| Page 12
Exclusions• Specific Technology/Wi-Fi• Site related needs (including Athletic
Fields)• Underground infrastructure• Housing
But these should be considered when the Facilities Masterplan is updated
ParametersThe college has some existing excess space. As such this Space Plan aims to balance new facilities required with the demolition of old and temporary buildings, to the best extent possible.
| Page 13
Part of Every ProjectThe following will be needs that get addressed as part of each Facilities Project identified:
• Address Faculty/Staff Meeting Rooms• Address HVAC, Plumbing and Electrical Issues• Address Office Needs• Address Lighting and Security• Address Signage and Wayfinding• Improve Campus Sustainability, M&O• Improve Student Study/Gathering Areas• Modernize/Add Class and Computer Labs• Reconfigure Classrooms in Old Buildings• Renovate and Add Restrooms• Update Technology and Wi-Fi
| Page 14
Major ProjectsMost or multiple areas of the Building affected:
• Address Library/Hub and Study Areas Needs• Address Student Services Needs• Modernize/Add Biology & Chemistry Labs• Modernize/Add Culinary Arts Lab• Modernize/Add Dance Lab• Modernize 350 Building• Modernize 400 Building• Modernize 500 Building• Modernize 700 Building• Modernize Partial 900 Student Center (Student
Clubs Gathering Space & Multicultural Center• Modernize 1100 Gymnasium• Modernize 1300 Building Trades• Modernize 1500 Early Childhood Education• Modernize 1550 Building• Modernize 1600 Public Services• Modernize 1800 Sesnon House• Modernize 2000 – 2050 Maintenance & Op. etc.• Watsonville Center Improvements
| Page 15
Other ProjectsMost or multiple areas of the Building affected:
• Smaller Needs for Newer Buildings (Horticulture, 300 Building etc.)
• HVAC, Plumbing, Electrical, Technology, Sustainability, M&O Projects in buildings not listed previously
| Page 16
Addressing Library/Hub and Study Area Needs• Re-configure and modernize all floors• Move out Digital Media and some Classrooms to
free up required growth space• Enclose space between “the cave” and the main
floor of library for required growth space
| Page 17
• Best Practice for California Community Colleges is to collocate Student Services (often referred to as a “One Stop”)
• Modernize Building 200 to accommodate the majority of Student Services
Addressing Student Service Needs
| Page 18
Modernize/Add Biology and Chemistry Class Labs• Existing 600 Building is not suitable for Science
and can not accommodate both Biology and Chemistry growth needs
• Build new Science Center• Recommend demolish 100 Building and 450
Forum for new Science Center
| Page 19
Modernize/Add Culinary Arts• Existing 908 Culinary Lab outdated and remote
from rest of program; Sesnon House limited• Demolish portable 2500 & 2600 and build new
Culinary Lab in proximity to Sesnon and VAPA
| Page 20
Modernize/Add Older Buildings• 350• 400• 500• 700• 900*• 1100• 1300• 1500• 1550• 1600• 1800
* 900 Student Center vacated spaces are proposed to be modernized for Student Clubs gathering space and Multicultural Center
| Page 21
• 1600 Public Services too small for Public Safety and Fire Academy
• Build a new Public Safety/Fire Academy building
• House the Sheriff’s Office too: will allow for the demolition of temporary Sheriff’s Office
• 1600 will be renovated to accommodate Community Ed, Public Relations, Small Business Development: will allow for the demolition of 2100A, 2100B and 2100C
Modernize 1600 and Public Safety/Fire Academy
| Page 22
• Existing 2000 – 2050 Maintenance & Operations, Administration & Purchasing Complex will cost more to repair than replace per State Assessment
• Demolish old buildings and build new Maintenance & Operations Complex on existing site
Replace 2000 – 2050 Maintenance & Operations Complex
| Page 23
Secondary EffectsProjects outlined so far create vacated spaces in some buildings, these become secondary effects projects that can address additional facilities needs:
• Vacated space in SAC (from One Stop project) allows Business Services to be collocated in SAC East with rest of Administration (after SAC West is renovated to address current deficiencies)
• Vacated space in SAC (from One Stop project) allows Student Learning Communities to be collocated in SAC West
• Relocating Foster Youth into SAC West allows Student Health to be relocated at the bottom floor of Library/LRC 1000
Other ProjectsOther projects are for localized (smaller) areas of buildings not discussed so far. An example includes adding a Landscape Design Class Lab in the 5000 Horticulture Building
| Page 24
| Page 25
VAPA Pavilion & Dance Center• Existing Dance in 1100
inadequate and remote from VAPA• Gallery closer to VAPA• Food/Cafe• Shaded gathering space• Conference Space• Better Community Education
Facilities• Security concerns around VAPA
complex• Leverage VAPA faciliites for
multiple community uses/events
These needs would be addressed by building a new VAPA Pavilion & Dance Center.
• Reconfigure Building D to accommodate Science wet labs
• Modernize and Reconfigure Building A to address numerous needs on all floors but adding a small addition to the front of the building
Watsonville Center
| Page 26
Proposed Aptos Conceptual Site Plan
| Page 27
Proposed Project Sequencing (One method)
| Page 28
Proposed Project Sequencing (One method)
| Page 29
Proposed Project Sequencing (One method)
| Page 30
Proposed Project Sequencing (One method)
| Page 31
Proposed Project Sequencing (One method)
| Page 32
Proposed Project Sequencing (One method)
| Page 33
Proposed Project Sequencing (One method)
| Page 34
Proposed Project Sequencing (One method)
| Page 35
Proposed Project Sequencing (One method)
| Page 36
Proposed Project Sequencing (One method)
| Page 37
Proposed Project Sequencing (One method)
| Page 38
Reconfiguring Classrooms
• For:• Technology• Equipment/Writing Surfaces• Furniture• Sizing – sf/per student• Sizing – # of student chairs• Extent of Flexibility/Adaptability
• Needs to be tied back to Cabrillo College Classroom Guidelines & Standards
| Page 39
Reconfiguring Classrooms
Old Paradigm
New Paradigm
Why?
| Page 41
SETTING THE STAGE FOR INNOVATION Today’s Learners
Read Hear See ReadHearSee
ReadHearSee
Experience
ReadHearSee
ExperienceTeach
KNOWLEDGERETAINED
10% 20% 30% 70%50% 90%
Studies support the idea that learning is facilitated through hands-on, inter-disciplinary, and experiential projects.
| Page 42
ACTIVE LEARNING DEFINITION
“Instructional activities involving students in doing things and thinking about what they are doing.” 1
1. Bonwell & Eisen “Instructional activities involving students in doing things and thinking about what they are doing” (Bonwell and Eisen, 1991, p. ii)
Image of active learning occurring in classroom
| Page 43
ACTIVE LEARNING STRATEGIES
SIMPLE
COMPLEX
| Page 44
ACTIVE LEARNING SPECTRUM
INTRODUCING STUDENT ACTIVITY INTO TRADITIONAL LECTURE
INTERACTIVE LECTURE
COOPERATIVE LEARNING: LEARNER-CENTERED WHILE INSTRUCTOR RETAINS CONTROL
COLLABORATIVE LEARNING: INSTRUCTOR & STUDENT PLACED ON EQUAL FOOTING
FLEXIBLE PEDAGOGIES FLIPPED CLASSROOM| Page 45
INSIDE THE CLASSROOM
Lecture Halls Flexible Classroom Flexible ClassroomMobile Tablet Arm
ChairsMobile Tables &
Chairs
Hi-Tech Classroom
| Page 46
ACTIVE LEARNING LECTURE HALLS
Semi-circle layout facilitates class discussion Two tables per tier facilitates break-out group work. • 20 to 25 square feet per student
• Dual Content for Audio-Visual Challenging | Page 47
MOBILE TABLET ARM CHAIRS CLASSROOMS Writable Wall
Smart Short-Throw Projector
“Interactive Classrooms”
| Page 48
• 20 to 24 square feet per student• 20 students (small class size)
Tablet Integrated Seating
Movable FurnitureAdaptable Furniture
Collaborative Furniture
| Page 49
FLEXIBLE TABLES & CHAIRS CLASSROOMS
Writable Wall
Smart Short-Throw Projector
“Immersive Classrooms” • Quickly Move between Class Discussion & Group Work• Tables & Chairs Look Professional• Interactive Projectors & Writable Walls for Group Work
| Page 50
• 26 square feet per student• 32 students (small to medium class size)
FLEXIBLE TABLES & CHAIRS CLASSROOMS
Writable Wall
Smart Short-Throw Projector
“Immersive Classrooms” • Quickly Move between Class Discussion & Group Work• Tables & Chairs Look Professional• Interactive Projectors & Writable Walls for Group Work
| Page 51
• 26 square feet per student• 32 students (small to medium class size)
HI-TECH CLASSROOM
Student-Centered Group Work + Faculty Instruction • Fixed Tables w/
Adjustable Screens• “Mobile” Version with movable tables,
chairs, & AV carts. | Page 52
• 25 to 30 square feet per student• Quickly move between group work & faculty lecture
science labs are moving toward more open, flexible environments to support multiple disciplines for both lecture and lab activities
Central area supports lecture and group work
Variety of lab table heights supports multiple disciplines
| Page 53
Highly Flexible Lab Space
Transparency to Common AreasForward Facing Benches
Open Teaching Labs
| Page 54
OUTSIDE THE CLASSROOM
Collaboration Space Interprofessional Learning
Communities
| Page 55
Technology for Collaboration
Variety of UseStudent Study & Social Spaces
Meeting Places
| Page 56
COLLABORATION SPACE
Highly Used by Students• Study Sessions• Group Work
Successful Features:
| Page 57
• Expansive Writable Walls• Locations next to classrooms & faculty offices
Recommended