View
214
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
1
Extreme Markets II: MonopolyChapter 6
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
2
Introduction
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
3
USPS
Since 1863, the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) has had a monopoly on light, sealed correspondence known as first-class mail.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
4
What’s Ahead
In this chapter we shall study the situation in which a single seller is so dominant and substitutes for its
product are so poor that we can treat that seller as having no competitors who can respond quickly to its
choices.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5
One-Price Monopoly
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
6
Some Ground RulesProduct definition: The monopolist produces a
single, homogeneous, divisible product or service.
Certainty: The firm knows with certainty the demand and cost conditions it faces.
Ignorance or disregard of rivals: The monopolist attempts to maximize its immediate profit. In particular, it does not consider the possible
reactions of future competitorsor firms that produce close substitutes for its
output.Single price: The monopolist must charge all customers identical prices at all times.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
7
Maximizing Revenue and Maximizing Profit
For a monopolist, the marginalrevenue from selling an extra unit
is less than the price for that unit.
For the demand curve at the rightthe monopolist can sell 3 units at
a price of $10, earning $30 inrevenue. To sell 4 units, the
monopolist must lower price to $9,yielding $36 in revenue.
The monopolist can sell 4 units atA price of $9, but the marginal
For the 4th unit is only $6.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
8
Maximizing Revenue and Maximizing Profit
Revenue is maximized when MR = 0,at 6 units of output.
Profit is maximized when MR = MC,at 4 units of output.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
9
Comparing Monopoly and Perfect CompetitionThis is the demand for spring
water.Assume that MC = 0. Suppose
there are 110 competitive firms each capable of producing 1/10 of a
gallon.With a fixed supply of 11
gallons, theprevailing market price will be
$1.Now imagine a single firm monopolizes
the industry. The monopolist willproduce 6 gallons and charge a price
of $6 per unit.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
10
Comparing Monopoly and Perfect Competition – Deadweight Loss
The problem with this monopoly is not the 6 gallons that still change hands. It is
the 5 gallons that are no longer produced
and exchanged. The gallons that go unexchanged
engenderwhat economists call a
deadweight loss—a loss of benefits to consumers and/orproducers that is gained by
no one.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
11
Do Monopolies Raise Prices? - Some Historical Cases
Standard Oil of New Jersey: Between 1880 and 1895, John D. Rockefeller’s company controlled
between 82 and 88 percent of U.S. refining capacity. A gallon of refined
oil in the barrel that sold for 9.33 cents in 1880 had fallen to 5.91 cents by 1897.14 Over that period,
Standard Oil increased its output of kerosene by 74 percent and
lubricating oil by 82 percent. (Gasoline was unimportant before the automobile.) In 1892,
Standard Oil refined 39 million barrels of crude oil, which grew to 99 million
barrels in 1911, the eve of the company’s breakup by federal authorities.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
12
Do Monopolies Raise Prices? - Some Historical Cases
American Sugar Refining Company: Mergers between competitors in the late 1880s gave American Sugar
95 percent of U.S. sugar-refining capacity in 1893.16. Wholesale refined sugar sold for 9.60 cents a pound in 1880, 6.17 cents in 1890, and 4.97 cents in 1910.
Because the wholesale price of refined sugar is heavily influenced by the price of raw sugar, the margin per pound between the raw and refined
products may be more informative. It fell from 1.44 cents in 1882 to 0.50 cents in 1899.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
13
Do Monopolies Raise Prices? - Some Historical Cases
American Tobacco Company: In 1880 (long before health concerns arose), cigarettes were a minor part of tobacco product output, which was mostly cigars and bagged tobacco for pipes and handmade cigarettes. Manufactured cigarettes became popular, but the growth of sales was hindered by high production costs. In 1890, JamesB. “Buck” Duke (benefactor of Duke University) merged 90 percent of U.S. cigarette-making capacity into the American Tobacco Company, which dominated the industry until its forced breakup in 1911. American’s engineers designed and built the first reliable, low-cost cigarette-making machines and continuously improved them. Its cigarettes sold for $2.77 per thousand in 1895, and $2.20 per thousand in 1907. This decline is remarkable because over those years the price of leaf tobacco rose by 40 percent, from 6 cents to 10.5 cents per pound.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
14
Do Monopolies Raise Prices? - Innovation or Inefficiency?
This shows that a monopolist
whose marginal costs fall will increase its profits by
raising output and lowering price,
but not by the full drop in cost. Thus, innovation
thatlowers a monopolists
costswill benefit both the monopolist and her
customers.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
15
Monopoly in the Long Run
Any monopoly worth having must be hard for competitors to erode quickly.
Some important ones have been based on ownership of a resource with few good substitutes,
like DeBeer’s diamonds.
An exclusive resource can also take the form of intellectual property, like inventions.
Some monopolies exist because competitors are legally unable to challenge them.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
16
MULTIPLE-PRICE MONOPOLY
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
17
Separating Markets by Demand Elasticity: Price DiscriminationHere is the daily market demand curve for sparkling mineral water
that only you produce. Assume that your fixed costs are zero and
marginal cost is $2 a gallon. If you must charge only one price, you
maximize profit by selling 5 gallons at $7 each for a profit of $25.
Assume that later in the day you see another opportunity to sell to buyers
with lower valuations. You set an afternoon price of $4 per gallon for people to take home and drink with
dinner. These customers buy an additional 3 gallons, and your profit
rises to $31.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
18
Separating Markets by Demand Elasticity: Price Discrimination
Three principles for successful price discrimination :1. The seller must be able to group buyers by their willingness to pay for the good (elasticity of demand).2. The seller must be able to prevent low-price buyers from reselling their purchases to those who would otherwise pay high prices.3. Barriers to entry must be set for competitors who produce good substitutes and do not price discriminate, because they could take away the seller’s high-price customers.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
19
Other Forms of Price Discrimination – The ChevetteJapanese competition with domestic auto producers
began inthe early 1970s, when more economical models
became popular as buyers responded to the gasoline shortages that occurred during that decade’s energy
crises. In 1975, GeneralMotors (GM) introduced the Chevette, a tiny, no-frills Chevrolet that promised fuel economy comparable to
that of Japanese cars. GM charged dealers in the Northeast higher wholesale prices than dealers in
California for identical Chevettes. Why? The Japanese imports were more abundant on the West coast making the demand for Chevettes more price
elastic on the West coast than in the Northeast.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
20
Other Forms of Price Discrimination – Parking Garages
Price discrimination does not require actually quoting different prices to customers. The Wells
Fargo Bank Tower in downtown Los Angeles displays this sign at its parking entrance: “First
hour $8, second through fourth hours $5 each, park all day for $25.” Everyone sees the same sign, but customers staying for only an hour pay $8. Those who stay 3 hours pay an average of $6 per hour ($8.00 + 2 × $5.00)/3, and those who stay for 8
hours pay an average of $3.12 per hour. Charging less per hour for longer stays is consistent with the
elasticity rule.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
21
Other Forms of Price Discrimination – Discount Coupons
About once a week many households receive large envelopes in
the mail containing discount coupons from such local businesses as carpet cleaners, gardeners, and grocery
stores. Coupon users can save an average of 30 percent on each item offered, but some people throw the
envelope away unopened. Coupons attract people who can be enticed into buying items for a small cash
discount, that is, those with more elastic demands for particular products.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
22
VARIATIONS ON PRICE DISCRIMINATION
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
23
Cover ChargesClubs with live
entertainment often collect a cover charge from all
patrons before they enter. After paying it, you can stay as long as you want and buy as many drinks as you want.With the demand curve for drinks shown, at a price of
$5you would buy 8 drinks. The diagram also shows that you
would be willing to pay a cover charge up to $28.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
24
Self-Selection
Some sellers let customers choose from a menu of cover charge/commodity charge combinations. A
supplier of cell phone service might do this by offering two options: (1) a low service (cover) charge
and a high price per minute of use (commodity charge), or (2) a high service charge and a low price
per minute.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
25
Tying and Bundling - The Consumer Benefits of Bundling
Goods or services are often sold as packages of potentially separable components. Customers gain in several ways when GM gives them no choice but to
buy cars with preinstalled engines built by the company.
By comparison, most boats are sold without engines. The buyer of a hull can easily install an outboard motor just by clamping it on, and the right motor
depends on the customer.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
26
Tying and Bundling - Price Discrimination by Tie-Ins
A seller can also tie two goods together in a single
package to facilitate price discrimination, a potentially profitable strategy if their demands are interrelated. In the early and mid-twentieth
century, for example, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) dominated the market for punch-card tabulating equipment
used for accounting and other record-keeping purposes. IBM Chose to lease their machines so that they could terminate any customer who did
not use IBM-made punch cards.
(c) 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
27
Tying and Bundling
Bundling unrelated products is a losing strategy. If demands for the two goods are independent, this
strategy cannot possibly raise your profits and more likely will lower them.
A monopolist can increase profits by bundling two goods whosedemands are negatively correlated but will reduce profit by
trying to bundle two goods whose demand is positivelycorrelated.
Recommended