View
222
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Environmental Safeguard Monitoring Report
15 September 2017 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
INO: Loan 2817- Regional Road Development
Project
Prepared by Project Management Unit, Directorate of Road Network Development, for the
Directorate General of Highways, Ministry of Public Works and Housing and the Asian
Development Bank.
NOTES
(i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Indonesia ends on 31 December. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2011 ends on 31 December 2011.
(ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This environmental safeguard monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
ABBREVIATIONS
ADB Asian Development Bank
AMDAL Indonesian Environmental Impact Assessment (Analisis Mengenai
Dampak Lingkungan Hidup)
AMP Asphalt mixing plant
ANDAL Indonesian Environmental Impact Statement (Analisis Dampak
Lingkungan Hidup)
BLHD Regional Environmental Agency (Badan Lingkungan Hidup Daerah)
CTC Core Team Consultant
DSC Design and Supervision Consultants
DGH Directorate General of Highway (Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga)
Dinas PU Provincial Public Works Agency (Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Provinsi)
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EMP Environmental Management Plan
EMMP Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan (issued by DGH as
part of the contract)
GOI Government of Indonesia
GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism
IEE Initial Environmental Examination
IDB Islamic Development Bank
MPWH Ministry of Public Works and Housing
MPR Monthly Progress Report
PIU Project Implementation Unit
PMU Project Management Unit
RKL Indonesian Environmental Management Plan (Rencana Pengelolaan
Lingkungan)
RPL Indonesian Environmental Monitoring Plan (Rencana Pemantauan
Lingkungan)
RRDP Regional Roads Development Project
Sub-EARS Environmental Affairs and Road Safety Sub-Directorate
UKL-UPL Indonesian Environmental Management Effort and Environmental
Monitoring Effort Document (Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan - Upaya
Pemantauan Lingkungan)
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS..........................................................................................................i
TABLES.................................................................................................................................ii
FIGURES............................................................................................................................... ii
APPENDICES........................................................................................................................ ii
Part I: INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1
1.1. Brief Project Description ............................................................................................ 1
1.2. Objectives of the AEMR ............................................................................................ 4
1.3. Construction Activities and Project Progress in 2015................................................. 4
1.4. RRDP Project Organization and Environmental Management Team......................... 7
Part II: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING.......................................................................... 11
2.1. Environmental Approvals and Permits..................................................................... 11
2.2. Environmental Monitoring........................................................................................ 17
Part III: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ...................................................................... 28
3.1 Environmental Management Plan (EMP)................................................................. 28
3.2 Status of Monthly Environmental Report Submission .............................................. 33
3.3 Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures.......................................................... 34
3.4 ADB Review Missions and CTC Site Inspections .................................................... 34
3.5. Non-compliances and Corrective Action Plans ........................................................ 35
3.6. Public Consultations................................................................................................ 42
3.7. Public Complaints/Grievances and Resolutions....................................................... 42
PART IV: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................... 44
4.1. Conclusions............................................................................................................. 44
4.2. Recommendations................................................................................................... 45
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
ii
TABLES
Table 1: Status of RRDP Sub-projects/Packages (as of 2015).............................................. 5
Table 2: Environmental Documents/Permits of RRDP Sub-projects/Packages ................... 12
Table 3: Environmental Documents/Permits for Asphalt Mixing Plant and Quarry............... 14
Table 4: Status of Environmental Monitoring in 2015 .......................................................... 18
Table 5: Baseline Ambient Air Quality Measurements......................................................... 23
Table 6: Baseline River Water Quality Measurements ........................................................ 24
Table 7: Baseline Noise Level Measurements .................................................................... 26
Table 8: Status of DGH, SDEA, PMU and CTC on EMP Responsibilities............................ 28
Table 9: Status of the DSC on EMP Responsibilities in 2015.............................................. 30
Table 10: Status of the Contractors on EMP Responsibilities.............................................. 32
Table 11: Detailed Status of Monthly Environmental Report Submissions........................... 33
Table 12: ADB Review Mission and CTC Inspection........................................................... 34
Table 13: Non-Compliances and Corrective/Preventive Actions Identified in 2015.............. 36
Table 14: Complaints/ Grievances Recorded in 2015.......................................................... 42
FIGURES
Figure 1: Location Sub--projects/Packages at West and North Kalimantan........................... 2
Figure 2: Location Sub-projects/Packages at Central and East Java .................................... 3
Figure 3: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation - National ............................... 8
Figure 4: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 1: West Kalimantan .... 9
Figure 5: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 1: North Kalimantan.... 9
Figure 6: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 2: Central Java ......... 10
Figure 7: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 3: East Java.............. 10
Figure 8: Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM)................................................................ 43
APPENDICES
Appendix A - Implementation of Environmental Mitigating Measures – Construction Phase
Appendix B - Air Quality, Water Quality, and Noise Level Monitoring Data
Appendix C - Photographs
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
1
PART I: INTRODUCTION
1.1. Brief Project Description
1. The Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP) is financed through a Project Loan from
the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Islamic Development Bank (IDB). The project
proponent and executing agency is the Directorate General of Highways (DGH), known as
Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga (Ditjen Bina Marga) of the Ministry of Public Works and
Housing (MPWH), known as Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat.
Since October 2014, the Government of Indonesia has combined the public work and
public housing sectors into the Ministry of Public Works and Housing of.
2. The RRDP aims to improve important national and strategic road corridors in Northern
Kalimantan and Southern Java to encourage economic growth in these two (2) less
developed and poorer areas of Indonesia. The rehabilitation, capacity expansion and new
construction of roads will improve connectivity and access to services in the
abovementioned provinces. Improved road infrastructure in southern Java is necessary
for increased economic growth to improve access to markets and to attract investment in
that area. Road network development in Kalimantan will ensure that economic
development will occur in less developed and remote areas. The Project will improve
access of poor rural and minority villages to income generating opportunities and social
services, particularly in North Kalimantan.
3. The RRDP consists of eleven (11) sub-projects or packages and the scope of works
include: rehabilitation, improvement or construction about 476 km of roads and bridges in
four (4) provinces of Indonesia, namely West Kalimantan and North Kalimantan (Figure
1); and Central Java and East Java (Figure 2). Of the 476 km, about 3.860 km will involve
the rehabilitation or replacement of bridges and 40 km will be the construction of new roads
along agricultural areas where there are existing earthen tracks in some sections. ADB
finances approximately 400 km of roads in East Java, West and East Kalimantan, and
consulting services. IDB provides funding for approximately 76 km of roads in Central
Java.
4. The civil works of the RRDP included widening and partial reconstruction of all roads to a
minimum width of 6 m with some minor deviations. All subproject roads are designed as
two-lane two-way roads, which consist of a 6-meter carriage way plus 2 x 1-meter m
aggregate shoulder and 2 x 1-meter side ditch. New alignment will also be constructed
along existing tracks and/or delineated areas. Rehabilitation, asphalt pavement, and
widening works will be undertaken on existing substandard 2-lane gravel or asphalt roads
which are strategic to meet national highway standards.
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
2
Figure 1: Location Sub--projects/Packages at West and North Kalimantan
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
3
Figure 2: Location Sub-projects/Packages at Central and East Java
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
4
1.2. Objectives of the AEMR
5. The objective of the Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR) is to present the
environmental mitigation and monitoring activities undertaken by the RRDP in 2015. This
report also includes updates on project progress, status including gaps identified in the
EMP implementation and environmental monitoring data. Further, it reports on non-
compliances identified in the ADB Review Mission and CTC site inspections conducted in
that year. Community complaints and Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) implemented
in 2015 are also reported.
6. The method employed for developing this AEMR is based on data and information that are
reviewed, extracted, analyzed, and as available from the following sources:
• Design and Supervision Consultant (DSC) Monthly Environmental Reports from
October 2014 to December 2015;
• Core Team Consultant (CTC) Environmental Specialist Site Visit Reports; and
• Correspondences of/between the contractors, DSC, and CTC.
1.3. Construction Activities and Project Progress in 2015
7. The eighteen (18) road sections of the RRDP were grouped into eleven (11) construction
work packages (CW). The packages including their contractor details and work progress
achieved up to the end of 2015 are shown in Table 1. The contractors for the eleven (11)
CW packages had been mobilized and commenced the construction activities in 2015.
8. The road sections that are combined into a single construction work package are as
follows:
West Kalimantan
• Sosok – Tayan and Tanjung – Batas Kota Sangau were grouped as CW-05;
• Singkawang - Tebas Section1 (previously Singkawang overlay), Singkawang -
Tebas (Section 2), Sambas Bypass and Tanjung Harapan - Galing as CW-06; and
• Galing - Simpang Tanjung and Simpang Tanjung - Aruk (Batas Serawak, Malaysia)
as CW-07.
North Kalimantan (previously part of East Kalimantan)
• Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas and Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas -
Sekatak Buji (Phase 1) as CW-08; and
• Simpang Tiga Apas - Simanggaris (Section 2) and Simanggaris - Batas Negara
(Serudong) as CW-11.
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
5
Table 1: Status of RRDP Sub-projects/Packages (as of 2015)
Package No. Road Section Length (km) Contractor Activities and Progress
Central Java
CW-01 Tambak Mulyo – Wawar 38.46 Joint operation of PT
Pembangunan Perumahan
(Persero) and PT Armada Hada
Graha
Clearing and grubbing, common
embankment, and common
excavation
Project progress: 2.24%
CW-02 Giriwoyo - Duwet (Section-1) 23.75 PT.Hutama Karya (Persero) Bridge construction and road
widening (excavation)
Project progress: 2.94%
CW-03 Wawar - Congot 14.13 PT. Jaya Konstruksi Manggala
Pratama, Tbk
Clearing and grubbing, box
culverts, and masonry works for
retaining wall
Project progress: 14.41%
East Java
CW-04 Jolosutro – Sendangbiru 21.30 PT. Hutama Karya (Persero) Road shoulder, drainage and
bridge construction
Project progress: 76.41%
West Kalimantan
CW-05
Sosok - Tayan 41.60 Joint operation of PT Yasa Patria
Perkasa and PT Budi Bakti Prima
Common excavation and
asphalting works
Project progress: 8.71%Tanjung - Batas Kota Sanggau 37.60
CW-06
Tebas - Singkawang Section 1 (previously
Singkawang overlay)
3.60 Joint operation of PT Brantas
Abipraya, PT Tri Citra Perdana
and PT Trifa Abadi
Excavation (road widening) and
side ditch
Project progress: 58.26%Tebas - Singkawang Section 2 26.20
Sambas Bypass 6.10
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
6
Package No. Road Section Length (km) Contractor Activities and Progress
Galing - Tanjung Harapan 20.07
CW-07
Simpang Tanjung - Galing 40.91 Joint operation of PT Waskita
Karya and PT Yala Patria Perkasa
Bridge construction, excavation
and grade preparation, and side
ditch
Project progress: 37.12%
Aruk (Batas Sarawak) -Simpang Tanjung 11.13
North Kalimantan (This area was part of East Kalimantan Province prior to 2013)
CW-08
Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung
Palas, and Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas -
Sekatak Buji (Section 1)
34.82 PT Waskita Karya Excavation and grade preparation,
pavement widening and shoulders,
side ditch, and box culvert
Project progress: 43.75%
CW-09
Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji
(Section2)
65.03 Joint operation of PT Brantas
Abipraya and PT Mahir Jaya
Mahakam Raya
Side ditch
Project progress: 38.99%
CW-10
Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris
(Section-1)
45.00 Joint operation of PT
Pembangunan Perumahan and PT
Perdasa
Excavation and embankment, side
ditch, and grade preparation
Project progress: 40.12%
CW-11
Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris
(Section-2)
27.15 Halla Corporation Common excavation and rock
excavation, common embankment,
and side ditch/drainage
Project progress: 12.02%Simanggaris - Batas Negara (Serudong) 20.80
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
7
1.4. RRDP Project Organization and Environmental Management Team
9. Several national and provincial agencies are involved in the RRDP implementation and its
project management chart at the national level is shown in Figure 3. The Directorate
General of Highways (DGH) under the Ministry of Public Works and Housing (MPWH) is
the executing agency responsible for the overall RRDP implementation. The Project
Management Unit (PMU) established within DGH are headed by the Director of the
Directorate Road Networks Development, and it facilitates land acquisition, resettlement,
and environmental mitigation. Further, it ensures that local concerns are addressed
adequately.
10. An Officer in Charge has been designated for the PMU to oversee day-to-day activities
and prepare progress reports. The PMU is assisted by the Core Team Consultant (CTC).
The PMU in coordination with the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) for the Environmental
and Road Safety (EAR) of the Directorate Road Networks Development ensured that the
EMP are implemented throughout the project phases. The Design and Supervision
Consultants (DSC) are expected to conduct regular monitoring of the EMP implementation
by the Contractors and submit monthly environmental reports to the DGH/PMU and CTC.
The CTC will coordinate with the DSC in this aspect. In total, there are eleven (11)
contractors and/or its joint operation partners working for the respective CW in Central and
East Java as well as West and North Kalimantan, and these contractors are supervised
by three (3) DSCs. Figures 4 to 7 show the project management organization of the RRDP
based on the contractors and DSCs working areas in West and North Kalimantan as well
as in Central and East Java.
11. The DSCs worked with their respective Contractors under their supervision on the EMP
implementation. During the construction stage, the Contractors are primarily responsible
for the implementation of the environmental mitigation measures and associated
monitoring for their respective contract work packages. The DSCs should monitor and
prepare the monthly environmental reports and submit these reports to the PMU and CTC.
Th DSCs appointed for the 11 CW packages are:
• DSC-1 CECI Engineering Consultants, Inc., for all CW packages in West and North
Kalimantan;
• DSC-2 Botek Bosphorus Technical Consulting Corporation for all CW packages in
Central Java; and
• DSC-3 PT Perentjana Djaja for the work package in East Java Province.
The CTC appointed for the RRDP is Renardet S.A. and its joint venture partners. Based
on the submitted monthly environmental reports of the DSCs, the PMU with the assistance
of the CTC prepares the Semi-Annual Environmental Monitoring Reports for submission
to ADB through the DGH. The PMU coordinates with the DSCs on matters related to the
submitted monthly environmental reports.
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
8
Figure 3: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation - National
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
9
Figure 4: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 1: West Kalimantan
Figure 5: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 1: North Kalimantan
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
10
Figure 6: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 2: Central Java
Figure 7: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 3: East Java
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
11
PART II: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
2.1. Environmental Approvals and Permits
12. Since the IEE of the RRDP issued in October 2011, the Government of Indonesia has
promulgated the Government Regulation (Peraturan Pemerintah) No. 27 of 2012 (“GR
27/2012”) on Environmental Permitting. The GR 27/2012 requires that every business
and/or activity that will generate significant environmental impacts must have an AMDAL
(Environmental Impact Assessment), whereas those that do not generate significant
impacts must have a UKL-UPL (Environmental Management Effort and Environmental
Monitoring Effort) document. These documents are subject to approval by the Ministry of
Environment and Forestry or local governments (i.e. provincial and regency/municipality)
depending on the nature and scope of the business and/or activity. Based on the AMDAL
or UKL-UPL approval, the business and/or activity must apply for the Environmental Permit
(Izin Lingkungan) to the same government authority that granted the AMDAL or UKL-UPL
approval.
13. The requirement to secure the Environmental License in addition to the AMDAL or UKL-
UPL approval only applies for the AMDAL and UKL-UPL approved by the government after
the stipulation of the GR 27/2012. This means that the AMDAL and UKL-UPL approvals
of the RRDP granted prior to the stipulation of this GR remains valid and hence the project
owner does not require to apply for the Environmental Permit if no changes or
modifications are made to the mentioned documents. If changes to these documents are
made, a new or amended AMDAL and UKL-UPL will be subject to a new approval process
and subsequently the application for the Environmental Permit will be required. Table 2
presents the government approvals secured for the AMDAL and UKL-UPL of the RRDP
sub-project/work packages that were reported in 2015. Table 3 presents the similar
approvals secured for the asphalt mixing plant and quarry distributed within the sub-
project/packages of the RRDP.
14. There are no records indicating whether the AMDAL or UKL-UPL approval as well as
Environmental Permit exist for the CW-04 road package (East Java) and part of the CW-
06 road package (West Kalimantan). There are also similar issues in terms of no records
indicating the existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL approval as well as Environmental Permit
for the asphalt mixing plants (AMPs) and quarries for all CW packages in North Kalimantan
and East Java. However, UKL-UPL approvals have been secured for some AMPs and
quarries operated by the CW packages in West Kalimantan and Central Java.
Confirmation is required for the existence of these mandatory environmental approvals
and permits for some CW road packages, AMPs and the quarries as identified in Tables 2
and 3.
15. The proposed addition of the 12.3 km Sambas - Tanjung Harapan road section, located in
Sambas District of West Kalimantan Province, requires the preparation of a new
environmental approval and permit. The design of the road was being undertaken in 2015,
and therefore the preparation of an AMDAL or UKL-UPL will be proceeded by the DSC-1,
after consultation with the Regional Environmental Agency (BLHD) and the Sub-
directorate of Environmental Affairs and Road Safety (Directorate of Road Networks
Development under the DGH).
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
12
Table 2: Environmental Documents/Permits of RRDP Sub-projects/Packages
Package No. Road Section Environmental Approval/Permit Approval/Permit Holder
Central Java
CW-01 Tambak Mulyo – Wawar
Length: 38.46 km
AMDAL approval No. 6655.1/14/2005 (dated 5 October 2005)
granted by Governor of Central Java
Road Agency (Dinas Bina Marga) of
Central Java Province
CW-02 Giriwoyo - Duwet (Section-1)
Length: 23.75 km
CW-03 Wawar - Congot
Length: 14.13 km
East Java
CW-04 Jolosutro – Sendangbiru
Length: 21.30 km
The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL approvals for this CW
package is subject to confirmation.
Subject to confirmation
West Kalimantan
CW-05
Sosok – Tayan
Length: 41.60 km
UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/30/BLHKPK-A (dated 16 February
2011) granted by the Environmental Agency (BLH) of Sanggau
Regency
Directorate General of Highways
Tanjung - Batas Kota Sanggau
Length: 37.60 km
UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/31/BLHKPK-A (dated 16
February 2011) granted by BLH of Sanggau Regency
Directorate General of Highways
CW-06
Tebas - Singkawang Section 1
(previously Singkawang overlay)
Length: 3.60 km
AMDAL approval No. 154/BLHD/2013 (dated 18 February 2013)
granted by Governor of West Kalimantan.
The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL approvals for this CW
package is subject to confirmation.
Road Agency (Dinas Bina Marga) of
West Kalimantan ProvinceTebas - Singkawang (Section 2)
Length: 26.20 km
Sambas Bypass
Length: 6.10 km
The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL approvals for this CW
package is subject to confirmation.
Subject to confirmation
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
13
Package No. Road Section Environmental Approval/Permit Approval/Permit Holder
Galing - Tanjung Harapan
Length: 20.07 km
UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/42/BLH-A (dated 16 February
2011) granted by BLH of Sambas Regency
Directorate General of Highways
CW-07
Simpang Tanjung - Galing
Length: 40.91 km
UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/10/BLH-A (dated 13 January
2011) granted by BLH of Sambas Regency
Directorate General of Highways
Aruk (Batas Sarawak) -Simpang
Tanjung
Length: 11.13 km
AMDAL approval No. 542/BLH/2015 (dated 9 July 2015) and
Environmental Permit No. 543/BLH/2015 (dated 9 July 2015);
granted by Head (Bupati) of Sambas Regency.
Directorate General of Highways
North Kalimantan
CW-08
Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung
Palas
Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak
Buji (Section 1)
Length: 34.82 kmUKL-UPL approval No. 24/660/BPDL-1/XII-2010 (dated 20
December 2010) granted by Bapedalda of Bulungan RegencyDirectorate General of Highways
CW-09
Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak
Buji (Section2)
Length: 65.03 km
CW-10
Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris
(Section -1)
Length: 45.00 kmUKL-UPL approval No. 660/334/B.1.1/BLHD/VIII/2013 (dated 7
August 2013) granted by Head of Nunukan Regency; and
Environmental Permit No. 188.45/614/VIII/2013 (dated 7 August
2013) granted by Head of Nunukan Regency
Directorate General of Highways
CW-11
Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris
(Section-2)
Length: 27.15 km
Simanggaris - Batas Negara (Serudong)
Length: 20.80 km
UKL-UPL approval No. 666/SCI/B.1.1/BLHD/XII/2016 (dated 13
December 2010) granted by Head of Nunukan Regency
Directorate General of Highways
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
14
Table 3: Environmental Documents/Permits for Asphalt Mixing Plant and Quarry
Package
No.Road Section
Asphalt mixing plant Quarry
Environmental Approval/PermitApproval/Permit
HolderEnvironmental Approval/Permit
Approval/Permit
Holder
Central Java
CW-01
Tambak Mulyo – Wawar
Length: 38.46 km
UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/634 (dated
23 June 2015) granted by the
Environmental Office (KLH) of Kebumen
Regency; and
The existence of Environmental Permit
for this facility is subject to confirmation.
PT Armada Hada
Graha
UKL/UPL approval based on KLH of
Kabupaten Kebumen Decree No.
660.1/158/II/2014 (dated 18 February
2014)
The existence of Environmental Permit
for this facility is subject to confirmation.
CV Lista Karya
CW-02
Giriwoyo - Duwet
(Section-1)
Length: 23.75 km
UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/UKl-
UPL.059/2015 (dated 9 October 2015)
granted by KLH office of Wonogiri
Regency.
The existence of Environmental Permit
for this facility is subject to confirmation.
PT Ratna The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL
approval or Environmental Permit for this
facility is subject to confirmation.
-
CW-03
Wawar - Congot
Length: 14.13 km
UKL/UPL approval No. 665.2/17/2015
(dated 22 May 2015) granted by KLH
office of Purworejo Regency; and
The existence of Environmental Permit
for this facility is subject to confirmation.
PT Jaya Kontruksi
Manggala Pratama,
The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL
approval or Environmental Permit for this
facility is subject to confirmation.
-
East Java
CW-04
Jolosutro – Sendangbiru
Length: 21.30 km
The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL
approval or Environmental Permit for this
facility is subject to confirmation.
- The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL
approval or Environmental Permit for this
facility is subject to confirmation.
-
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
15
Package
No.Road Section
Asphalt mixing plant Quarry
Environmental Approval/PermitApproval/Permit
HolderEnvironmental Approval/Permit
Approval/Permit
Holder
West Kalimantan
CW-05
Sosok – Tayan
Length: 41.60 kmThe existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL
approval or Environmental Permit for this
facility is subject to confirmation.
-
UKL-UPL approval No.
660.1/02/BLHKPK-A (dated 11 January
2016) granted by the Regional
Environmental Office (BLHD) of Sanggau
Regency.
The existence of Environmental Permit
for this facility is subject to confirmation.
CV Yasa Quarindo
Tanjung - Batas Kota
Sanggau
Length: 37.60 km
CW-06
Tebas - Singkawang
Section 1 (previously
Singkawang overlay)
Length: 3.60 km
UKL/UPL approval No. 31/BI.H/2015
(dated 23 June 2014) granted by KLH of
Sambas Regency.
The existence of Environmental Permit
for this facility is subject to confirmation.
PT Brantas Abipraya
The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL
approval or Environmental Permit for this
facility is subject to confirmation.
-
Tebas - Singkawang
(Section 2)
Length: 26.20 km
Sambas Bypass
Length: 6.10 km
Galing - Tanjung
Harapan
Length: 20.07 km
CW-07
Simpang Tanjung -
Galing
Length: 40.91 km
UKL/UPL approval No. 47/BLH/2015
(dated 17 September 2015) granted by
BLH of Sambas Regency.
The existence of Environmental Permit
for this facility is subject to confirmation.
Joint operation of PT
Waskita Karya and
PT Yasa Patria
Perkasa
UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/278.a/BLH-
A (dated 22 December 2014) granted by
BLH of Sambas Regency
The existence of Environmental Permit
for this facility is subject to confirmation.
PT Jaya Kontruksi
Manggala PratamaAruk (Batas Sarawak) -
Simpang Tanjung
Length: 11.13 km
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
16
Package
No.Road Section
Asphalt mixing plant Quarry
Environmental Approval/PermitApproval/Permit
HolderEnvironmental Approval/Permit
Approval/Permit
Holder
North Kalimantan
CW-08
Tanjung Selor -
Simpang Tiga Tanjung
Palas
Simpang Tiga Tanjung
Palas - Sekatak Buji
(Section 1)
Length: 34.82 km
The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL
approval or Environmental Permit for this
facility is subject to confirmation.
-
The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL
approval or Environmental Permit for this
facility is subject to confirmation.
-
CW-09
Simpang Tiga Tanjung
Palas - Sekatak Buji
(Section2)
Length: 65.03 km
The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL
approval or Environmental Permit for this
facility is subject to confirmation.
- The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL
approval or Environmental Permit for this
facility is subject to confirmation.
-
CW-10
Simpang Tiga Apas -
Simanggaris (Section-1)
Length: 45.00 km
The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL
approval or Environmental Permit for this
facility is subject to confirmation.
- The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL
approval or Environmental Permit for this
facility is subject to confirmation.
-
Simpang Tiga Apas -
Simanggaris (Section-2)
Length: 27.15 km
The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL
approval or Environmental Permit for this
facility is subject to confirmation.
- The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL
approval or Environmental Permit for this
facility is subject to confirmation.
-
CW-11
Simanggaris - Batas
Negara (Serudong)
Length: 20.80 km
The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL
approval or Environmental Permit for this
facility is subject to confirmation.
- The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL
approval or Environmental Permit for this
facility is subject to confirmation.
-
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
17
2.2. Environmental Monitoring
16. The IEE’s Table 21 of the INO: RRDP (dated October 2011) requires the DSC, prior to the
commencement of the site works, should undertake environmental sampling (i.e. air
quality, noise, water quality, etc.) to establish the baseline conditions at each CW area.
Further, the DSC is required to implement the periodic Environmental Monitoring during
the construction phase as presented in Table 4. It generally requires the DSC to:
• Undertake monthly visual inspection of the following aspects: quarries and borrow
sites; material storage; erosion; landslide/rock fall; hydrocarbon/chemical storage;
waste management; surface water quality; air quality; noise; vibration;
landscaping/restoration; community; and traffic management; and
• Prepare monthly environmental monitoring reports for submission to PMU/SDEA
and CTC.
17. The status of each environmental monitoring requirements as reported by all DSCs is
summarized in Table 4, indicating that a few monitoring means were fully implemented as
part of the ongoing construction activities. Some monitoring was deemed as partially
implemented due to incomplete record suggesting whether the required monitoring means
have been regularly undertaken and the results documented. Nevertheless, most of the
monitoring means have not been implemented due to prolonged absence of the
environmental specialist of each DSC. Some quarry and borrow sites are still in operation,
and therefore some monitoring requirements with this regard are not yet applicable at this
stage.
18. The environmental monthly reports submitted by the DSC in 2015 does not have the
required environmental monitoring data indicating that both the baseline and periodic
sampling have not been undertaken for the mentioned period. In the light of these data,
the 2015 AEMR, however, attempts to present the available environmental baseline data
sourced from the government-approved AMDAL and UKL-UPL documents of the RRDP
sub-Projects/Work Packages, asphalt mixing plants and quarries/borrow pits (see Tables
5 to 7).
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
18
Table 4: Status of Environmental Monitoring
Aspect / Location Parameters Monitoring Means FrequencyGuideline Values/Standards/
IndicatorsStatus in 2015
1. Quarries and
Borrow Operation
Quarry and borrow sites Undertaken in
designated areas duly
licensed/ approved by
concerned authority
Visual inspection to
ensure fill is only
obtained from licensed
designated sites
Monthly by DSC (i) Environmental
permit/approval from
concerned agency.
(ii) Activities shall be limited to
licensed designated areas
only.
Partially implemented due to the
absence of UKL-UPL approval
and/or Environmental Permit for
some quarries and borrow sites.
Quarry and borrow sites Implementation of
erosion control
Visual inspection Monthly by DSC (i) No evidence of water
ponding or presence of fresh
gullies.
(ii) No increased visual turbidity
of surface water.
Partially implemented as there is
incomplete record indicating
whether this inspection has
been regularly conducted and
the result reported.
Quarry and borrow sites Proper site closure as
specified in the
environmental mitigation
plan.
Visual inspection Monthly by DSC (i) Pre-quarry conditions
(ii) Site left in a tidy state with
stable side slopes, proper
drainage and provided with
vegetation cover
(iii) DSC’s report testifying to
completion of restoration
work
Not applicable as quarries and
borrow sites are still in
operation.
2. Material Storage Site
Project alignment,
construction yard
Compliance with
requirements
Visual inspection Monthly by DSC (i) Activities shall be limited to
designated areas only
(ii) Materials management
procedures implemented.
(iii) No visible puddles of oil or
oil contaminated soil.
Partially implemented as there is
incomplete record indicating
whether this inspection has
been regularly conducted and
the result reported.
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
19
Aspect / Location Parameters Monitoring Means FrequencyGuideline Values/Standards/
IndicatorsStatus in 2015
3. Erosion
Project alignment Implementation of
erosion control
Visual inspection of
erosion prevention
measures and
occurrence of erosion
Monthly by DSC (i) Erosion control design
parameters.
(ii) No increased visual turbidity
of surface waters.
Partially implemented as there is
incomplete record indicating
whether this inspection has
been regularly conducted and
the result reported.
4. Landslide/Rockfall
Active landslide/ rock fall
sections and steep
mountainous slopes
Vegetation cover is
maintained.
Visual Inspection Monthly by DSC (i) Identified areas during
detailed design phase.
(ii) Adequacy, quality, and
specifications of planting;
Survival rate of plants.
Fully implemented as part of the
construction activities
Slope stabilization
engineering structures
(all susceptible areas
shall be protected by
either temporary or
permanent stabilization
works)
Slope stabilization
measures, landslide/
rockfall protection
measures
Visual inspection Monthly by DSC Adequacy, quality, and
specifications of landslide/rock
fall protection measures.
Fully implemented as part of the
construction activities
5. Hydrocarbon/
Chemical Storage
Construction camps Compliance with
environmental mitigation
requirements
Visual Inspection of
storage facilities
Monthly by DSC Provision of adequate storage
facilities
Not implemented
6. Waste Management
Construction camps Cleanliness of workers’
camps
Visual inspection Monthly by DSC (i) Proper collection, storage,
and disposal of solid waste.
(ii) Provision of clean and
adequate sanitation facilities.
Fully implemented as part of the
camp operations.
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
20
Aspect / Location Parameters Monitoring Means FrequencyGuideline Values/Standards/
IndicatorsStatus in 2015
Construction camps Proper site closure Visual inspection Monthly by DSC (i) Timely and effective waste
disposal.
(ii) Site appearance restored.
(iii) DSC’s report testifying
restoration of site.
Not applicable as the
construction camps are still
used.
7. Surface Water
Quality
Bridge construction sites Local surface waters are
protected
Visual inspection of
water management
Monthly by DSC (i) Project activities do not
cause turbidity/siltation and
flow obstruction of surface
waters.
(ii) Adequacy, quality, and
specifications of protection
measures provided against
washouts
Partially implemented as there is
incomplete record indicating
whether this inspection has
been regularly conducted and
the result reported.
All bridge construction
sites – upstream and
directly downstream of
major rivers or after a
pollution event
(i) Total suspended
solids (TSS)
(ii) Oil and grease,
(iii) Turbidity,
(iv) pH
Water sample collection
and analyses by
accredited laboratory
By DSC:
(i) once before
commencement of
construction works
(baseline); and
(ii) subsequently after a
reported pollution
event and/or
complaints)
Standardization of River
Categories II based on
Governmental Regulation No.
82 of 2001
Not implemented
8. Air Quality
Sensitive sites such as
major settlements,
schools, hospitals, etc.,
close to construction
sites and other project-
related facilities where
(i) TSP
(ii) PM10
Air sample collection
and analyses by
accredited laboratory
By DSC:
(i) once before
commencement of
construction works;
and
(ii) subsequently 1 time
The Control of Air Pollution,
Government Regulation No. 41
of 1999
Not implemented
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
21
Aspect / Location Parameters Monitoring Means FrequencyGuideline Values/Standards/
IndicatorsStatus in 2015
emission of high dust
levels occur.
a year
Asphalt mixing plant Designated areas Visual inspection to
ensure asphalt plant is
located >1 km from
residential areas
Monthly by DSC i) Environmental
approval/permit from
concerned agency.
ii) Activities shall be limited to
designated areas only
Partially implemented due to the
absence of UKL-UPL approval
and/or Environmental Permit for
some asphalt mixing plants.
Dust Compliance with
required mitigation
measures
Visual inspection to
ensure dust suppression
work plan is being
implemented
Monthly by DSC i) Measures, location, and
schedule for dust
suppression activities
ii) Air pollution control
equipment installed on
vehicles
iii) No complaints from
residents.
Partially implemented as there
was evidence of community
complaints about dust from the
road construction.
9. Noise
Sensitive areas Noise levels in dB(A) Noise meter By DSC:
i) Once before
commencement of
construction
activities; and
ii) Subsequently 2
times a year
i) The Control of Air Pollution,
Government Regulation No.
41 of 1999.
ii) Complaints from residents
Not implemented
10. Vibration
Sensitive areas Compliance with
required mitigation
measures
Visual inspection Monthly by DSC Complaints from residents Fully implemented as part of the
construction activities and
record of community complaints
11. Landscaping/
Reforestation
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
22
Aspect / Location Parameters Monitoring Means FrequencyGuideline Values/Standards/
IndicatorsStatus in 2015
Project alignment Progress of reforestation
activities
Visual inspection Monthly by DSC i) Adequacy, quality and
specifications of planting
ii) Survival rate of plants
iii) Watchman on site
Partially implemented as there is
incomplete record indicating
whether the progress of
reforestation has been
monitored.
12. Community
Project alignment (i) Consultations
(ii) Information
disclosure
Consult with government
and community groups
along the alignment to
monitor environmental
concerns
On-going by DSC (i) Number of public
consultations conducted
(ii) Recipients of project-related
documents
(iii) Number of complaints.
Fully implemented as part of the
construction activities.
13. Traffic Management
Project alignment (i) Number of
complaints
(ii) Number of traffic
enforcers in place
(iii) Number of traffic and
warning signs in
place
Visual inspection to strict
adherence to applicable
environmental mitigation
measures
On-going by DSC Number of complaints and
accidents
Fully implemented as part of the
construction activities.
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
23
19. As presented in Table 5, there are no baseline ambient air quality measurements or results
available reported in 2015 for the CW packages in Central and East Java as well as North
Kalimantan. However, some CW packages for West Kalimantan, particularly CW-06 and
CW-07, have baseline particulate matter (PM10) and total suspended particulate (TSP)
concentrations for one road section and their respective asphalt mixing plants (AMP) and
quarries. These two parameters are detected well below the Indonesian National Ambient
Air Quality Standards i.e. 150 µg/Nm3 (for PM10) and 230 µg/Nm3 (for TSP) as stipulated
in Government Regulation (GR) No. 41 of 1999 on Air Pollution Control.
Table 5: Baseline Ambient Air Quality Measurements
Road Section / Sampling PointSampling
DatePM10 TSP
Information
Source
Threshold value set by
GR No 41 of 1999150 µg/Nm3 230 µg/Nm3
Central Java
CW-01: Tambak Mulyo - Wawar - - - -
CW-02: Giriwoyo - Duwet - - - -
CW-03: Wawar - Congot - - - -
East Java -
CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendangbiru - - - -
West Kalimantan
CW-05 - Sosok – Tayan, Tanjung -
Batas Kota Sangga
8 Feb 2015 - 12 UKL-UPL Quarry -
Tambang Baru area
CW-06: Tebas -Singkawang Section
1 & 2, Sambas Bypass, Galing -
Tanjung Harapan
AMDAL for Tebas -
Singkawang
Section 1 & 2
Lat. 01013’37.5”
Long. 109o09’41.5”
19 Jan 2012
17 58.49
Lat. 01010’18.8”
Long. 109o01’06.4”18 62.24
Lat. 01003’23.7”
Long. 108o58’25.4”23 102
Lat. 00055’02.7”
Long. 108o59’01.0”24 105
- Access to AMP5 Mar 2014
- 30 UKL-UPL Asphalt
Mixing Plant- Base Camp - 28
- Galian C (Quarry)17 Sep 2010
- 30UKL-UPL Quarry
- Pontianak – Sambas road - 27
CW-07: Simpang Tanjung – Galing,
Simpang Tanjung-Aruk (Batas
Sarawak)AMDAL for
Simpang Tanjung-
Aruk- Simpang Tanjung - Aruk 1 road29 Apr 2015
- 72
- Simpang Tanjung - Aruk 2 road - 54
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
24
Road Section / Sampling PointSampling
DatePM10 TSP
Information
Source
- Simpang Tanjung - Aruk 3 road - 63
- Depan Kantor/Mess 5 Mar 2015 - 22UKL-UPL Asphalt
Mixing Plant
- Quarry area 16 Oct 2014 - 17 UKL-UPL Quarry
North Kalimantan
CW-08: Tanjung Selor - Simpang
Tiga Tanjung Palas, Simpang Tiga
Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji
(Section 1)
- - - -
CW-09: Simpang Tiga Tanjung
Palas - Sekatak Buji (Section 2)- - - -
CW-10: Simpang Tiga Apas -
Simanggaris (Section -1 & 2)- - - -
CW-11: Simanggaris - Batas Negara
(Serudong)- - - -
20. There are no baseline water quality measurements or results reported in 2015 for the CW
packages in Central and East Java as well as North Kalimantan. However, some water
quality data are available for some CW packages in West Kalimantan, and the results are
presented in Table 6 and interpreted against the water quality standards stipulated in
Government Regulation No. 82 Year 2001 on Water Quality Management and Water
Pollution Control, particularly Class 2 standards typically applied for water recreational
purpose, aqua culture, farming, irrigation, and other water uses required similar standards,
as follows:
• TSS are below the threshold value of 50 mg/L, except for the quarry area of CW-07
which indicates a concentration of around 81.3 mg/L;
• Oil and grease are well below the threshold value of 1 mg/L;
• Turbidity exceed the threshold value of 25 NTU for most locations and these
conditions are typical for water bodies in Kalimantan, which has a vast peatland,
except for the CW-06 AMDAL monitoring station in Sungai Singkawang, the CW-06
and CW-07 UKL-UPL monitoring station at their Asphalt Mixing Plants; and
• pH levels are within the range of 6 – 9 for most locations, except for the quarry area
of CW-07 showing pH of slightly below 6.
Table 6: Baseline River Water Quality Measurements
Location SamplingDate
TSS Oil andGrease
Turbidity pH
Threshold values 50 mg/L 1 mg/L 25 NTU 6 - 9
Central Java
CW-01: Tambak Mulyo - Wawar -
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
25
Location SamplingDate
TSS Oil andGrease
Turbidity pH
CW-02: Giriwoyo - Duwet - - - - -
CW-03: Wawar - Congot - - - - -
East Java
CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendangbiru - - - - -
West Kalimantan
CW-05: Sosok – Tayan, Tanjung -Batas Kota Sanggau
- Parit area (ditch)1
8 Feb 2015 30 0.15 29 6.28
CW-06: Tebas -SingkawangSection 1 & 2, Sambas Bypass,Galing -Tanjung Harapan2
- Sungai Tebas (Lat. 01013’10.1”Long. 109o08’55.9”)
19 Jan2012
29.2 0.316 55.2 6.05
- Sungai Sebangkau (Lat.0107’49” Long. 108o58’10.9”)
29.5 0.377 54.6 6.38
- Sungai Sebakau (Lat.01003’25.5” Long.108o58’26.9”)
81.3 0.317 58.1 6.37
- Sungai Singkawang (Lat.00055’03.9” Long. 108o59’01.9”
20.4 0.246 11.4 6.54
- Working area3 5 Mar 2014 17 0.22 21 6.26
- Quarry site4 17 Sep 2010 - - - 7.09
CW-07: Simpang Tanjung –Galing, Simpang Tanjung - Aruk5
(Lat. 01038’21.4” Long. 09o37’4.6”)
Apr 2015
38 <0.01 - 6.4
- Sungai Keranji (Lat.01037’27.9” Long.109o37’44.6”)
20 <0.01 - 6.2
- Sungai Sajingan (Lat.01037’11.6” Long. 109o38’27”)
20 <0.01 - 6.2
- PT. Waskita AMP5 5 Mar 2015 13 0.23 0,225 6.5
- Quarry site6 16 Oct 2014 93 0.14 38 5.37
North Kalimantan
CW-08: Tanjung Selor - SimpangTiga Tanjung Palas, SimpangTiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji(Section 1)
- - - - -
CW-09: Simpang Tiga TanjungPalas - Sekatak Buji (Section 2)
- - - - -
CW-10: Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris (Section -1 & 2)
- - - - -
CW-11: Simanggaris - BatasNegara (Serudong)
- - - - -
Note: 1UKL-UPL Quarry2AMDAL for Tebas -Singkawang Section 1 & 23UKL-UPL Asphalt Mixing Plant for CW-064UKL-UPL Quarry for CW-065PT Waskita asphalt mixing plant6UKL-UPL Quarry for CW-07
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
26
21. Table 7 indicates that there were no baseline measurements or periodic monitoring
undertaken or reported in 2015 for the CW packages in Central and East Java as well as
North Kalimantan. However, some baseline noise was reported for the CW packages in
West Kalimantan, indicating the noise levels measured are within the standards of 55
dB(A) for residential area and 70 dB(A) for industrial area as prescribed in the Minister of
Environment Decree No. Kep-48/MENLH/11/1996. Slightly higher noise levels were
measured and reported in the CW-06’s AMDAL for Tebas -Singkawang Section 1 & 2
which may be attributed to the sampling station locations which are along the inter-urban
road/highway.
Table 7: Baseline Noise Level Measurements
Location Sampling Date Noise Level [dB(A)]
Ambient noise level standard
Kep-48/1996
70dB(A) for industrial area
55 dB(A) for residential area
Central Java
CW-01: Tambak Mulyo - Wawar - -
CW-02: Giriwoyo - Duwet - -
CW-03: Wawar - Congot - -
East Java
CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendangbiru - -
West Kalimantan
CW-05 - Sosok – Tayan, Tanjung - Batas Kota
Sanggau1
- Tambang Baru (Quarry area)
8 Feb 2015 52.0
CW-06: Tebas -Singkawang (Section 1 & 2)2
- Lat. 01013’37.5”, Long. 109o09’41.5”
19 Jan 2012
72.3 ± 1.12
- Lat. 01010’18.8”, Long. 109o01’06.4” 55.9 ± 1,12
- Lat. 01003’23.7”, Long. 108o58’25.4” 69.2 ± 1,12
- Lat. 00055’02.7”, Long. 108o59’01.0” 72.3 ± 1,12
- Access to the area3
5 Mar 201445.7
- Base Camp Area3 45.5
- Quarry area (Galian C)4
17 Sep 201065.8
- Pontianak – Sambas road4 70.2
CW-07: Simpang Tanjung – Galing, Simpang
Tanjung – Aruk5
29 Apr 2015- Simpang Tanjung - Aruk 1 road 58
- Simpang Tanjung - Aruk 2 road 60
- Simpang Tanjung - Aruk 3 road 53
- Front of the office/Mess6 5 Mar 2015 62.3
- Quarry site/Penambangan7 16 Oct 2014 50.7
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
27
Location Sampling Date Noise Level [dB(A)]
North Kalimantan
CW-08: Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung
Palas, Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak
Buji (Section 1)
- -
CW-09: Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak
Buji (Section 2)- -
CW-10: Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris
(Section -1 & 2)- -
CW-11: Simanggaris - Batas Negara (Serudong) - -
Note: 1UKL-UPL for CW-052AMDAL for Tebas -Singkawang Section 1 & 23UKL-UPL Asphalt Mixing Plant for CW-064UKL-UPL Quarry for CW-065PT Waskita asphalt mixing plant6UKL-UPL Quarry for CW-07
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
28
PART III: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
3.1. Environmental Management Plan (EMP)
22. The EMP containing mitigation measures to be implemented during the construction phase
is defined in Table 20 of the IEE document, which is prepared by the Directorate General
of Highways and approved/issued by ADB in October 2011. Each contractor appointed is
responsible for implementing the EMP within its project-specific areas. Further, the
roles/responsibilities and its status as of 2015 with regard to this EMP implementation is
distributed within a wider organization in Table 23 of the IEE document.
23. The status of the implementation of the EMP responsibilities that should be fulfilled is
presented in: Table 8 for the organizations at the national level; Table 9 for the DSC; and
Table 10 for the contractors. The status is indicated as “Fully Implemented” and “Not
Implemented”. If the status is indicated as “Partially Implemented” it means that efforts
were undertaken to implement the mitigation measures, but the records are incomplete,
hindered by organizational matters, or the responsibility is not specifically stated in the
Terms of Reference/Contract, and these are described in subsequent tables.
Table 8: Status of DGH, SDEA, PMU and CTC on EMP Responsibilities
Agency/Role Responsibilities Status in 2015
Sub-directorate of
Environmental Affairs (SDEA),
now is the Sub-directorate of
Environmental and Road
Safety (SDERS) of the
Directorate of the Road
Network Development (under
the DGH) Environmental –
responsible for environmental
and social monitoring
Set procedures for environmental
management and monitoring based
on GOI and ADB requirements
Fully Implemented
Coordinate with PMU to ensure that
the EMP is implemented properly and
that required monitoring and reporting
are undertaken as required
Partially Implemented
(As per the organizational
structure presented in Figure 3,
there is no direct connection
between the PIU-SDERS and
PMU. Coordination is done at
the level of the Directorate of
the Road Network
Development.)
Provide training to provincial and
District officials on the environmental
and social management system for
road projects
Fully Implemented
(Trainings conducted by the
SDERS may not necessarily be
through the project but is in
performance of their mandate)
Coordinate with BLHD offices at the
District, City, and Provincial Levels
with regard to compliance of the
Project to GOI environmental
requirements
Fully Implemented
Project Management Unit
(PMU) responsible for day-to-
day management and
implementation of the project
Include the EMP in tender and
contract documents
Fully Implemented
Ensure that EMP provisions are
strictly implemented during various
project phases
Fully Implemented
Undertake monitoring of the
implementation of the EMMP
Fully Implemented
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
29
Agency/Role Responsibilities Status in 2015
(mitigation and monitoring measures)
with assistance from DSC
Ensure that DSC prepared monthly
reports, environmental monitoring
reports for submission to PMU/CTC.
Fully Implemented
With support from CTC, prepare semi-
annual environmental monitoring
reports for submission to ADB
Fully Implemented
Core Team Consultants (CTC)
provides project management
support to PMU with a
representative in each ‘Balai’
office
Prepare semi-annual reports on EMP
implementation (mitigation measures,
establishment of ambient baseline
data baseline, ambient monitoring,
etc.) based on the monthly monitoring
reports submitted by DSC.
The semi-annual environmental
monitoring reports shall be submitted
to ADB through DGH/PMU.
Fully Implemented
Implement the environmental capacity
building/training program proposed in
the IEE.
The training shall be conducted for
SDEA, Office PU, P2JN, and DGH
staff at provincial and district offices,
and environmental staff at the
provincial (Provinsi) and district
(Kabupaten) local governments
through training workshops on ADB’s
environmental safeguards
requirements and international best
practice on environmental
management and monitoring
Fully Implemented
(Not specifically mentioned in
the CTC TOR but training was
conducted for Contractors,
DSC and Satker/PPK)
Develop an environmental auditing
protocol for the construction period for
DSC’s guidance
Not implemented (Not specified
in the CTC TOR)
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
30
Table 9: Status of the DSC on EMP Responsibilities in 2015
Responsibilities
DSC – 1: CECI
Engineering
Consultants Inc.
–West and North
Kalimantan
DSC – 2: Botek
Bosphorus
Consulting -
Central Java
DCS – 3: PT
Perentjana Djaja
– East Java
Undertake regular monitoring of the
contractor’s implementation of the
environmental mitigation measures
specified in the EMP
Partially
implemented due
to incomplete
records indicating
whether
monitoring of the
EMP has been
regularly
conducted
Partially
implemented due
to incomplete
records indicating
whether
monitoring of the
EMP has been
regularly
conducted
Partially
implemented due
to incomplete
records indicating
whether
monitoring of the
EMP has been
regularly
conducted
Prepare monthly environmental monitoring
reports for submission to DGH/PMU and
CTC.
Such reports shall be the basis for the
semi-annual environmental monitoring
reports to be prepared by CTC for
submission to ADB.
Partially
Implemented as
report submission
was not regularly
submitted
Not Implemented Partially
Implemented as
report submission
was not regularly
submitted
Engage an accredited/licensed laboratory
or institution to undertake establishment
of baseline data on air quality, noise and
surface water quality prior to
commencement of site works based on
the EMMP.
Prepare corresponding reports for
submission to DGH/PMU and CTC.
Not implemented Not implemented Not implemented
Engage an accredited/licensed laboratory
or institution to conduct sampling during
construction phase and in response to
complaints or when there are pollution
events.
Prepare corresponding reports for
submission to DGH/PMU and CTC.
Not implemented Not implemented Not implemented
Review and approve the specific
environmental management plans (Dust
Suppression Program, Sewage
Management Plan, Solid Waste
Management Plan) to be prepared by the
contractors as specified in the EMP
Partially
implemented as
not all plans have
been submitted.
Partially
implemented as
not all plans have
been submitted.
Partially
implemented as
not all plans have
been submitted.
Provide on-the-job training to PU Office,
P2JN staff, provincial and district DGH
staff as well as to province and district
environmental staff on monitoring of
contractor’s environmental performance
and preparation of monitoring reports
Not implemented Not implemented Not implemented
Supervise civil works to ensure
compliance with the EMP
Partially
implemented as
there is incomplete
record indicating
whether the EMP
Partially
implemented as
there is
incomplete record
indicating whether
the EMP has been
Partially
implemented as
there is
incomplete record
indicating whether
the EMP has been
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
31
Responsibilities
DSC – 1: CECI
Engineering
Consultants Inc.
–West and North
Kalimantan
DSC – 2: Botek
Bosphorus
Consulting -
Central Java
DCS – 3: PT
Perentjana Djaja
– East Java
has been entirely
implemented
entirely
implemented
entirely
implemented
Recruit an environment, health and safety
manager who will be responsible in
ensuring that environmental mitigation
measures specified in the EMP are
implemented properly
Not implemented Not implemented Not implemented
Implement and provide sufficient funding
and human resources for proper and
timely implementation of required
mitigation measures in the EMP
Not implemented Not implemented Not implemented
Review and approve environmental
assessment reports required by the
Government.
Partially
implemented as
the record
indicating that
AMDAL, UKL-UPL
and Environmental
Permit for the CW
packages in West
Kalimantan only.
Partially
Implemented as
the record
indicating that
AMDAL, UKL-UPL
and Environmental
Permit available
only for some
AMP and quarries.
Not implemented
as currently no
record indicating
the existence of
AMDAL, UKL-
UPL, and
Environmental
Permit
Undertake monitoring of the project’s
environmental performance based on their
mandate
Not implemented Not implemented Not implemented
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
32
Table 10: Status of the Contractors on EMP Responsibilities
Contractors
Status in 2015
Recruitment of
Environmental, Health and
Safety Manager
Sufficient funding and
human resources
Central Java
CW-01 Tambak Mulyo – Wawar
Contractors: Joint operation of PT
Pembangunan Perumahan and PT Armada
Hada Graha
Fully implemented (Mr
Muhammad Isro)
Fully implemented
CW-02 Giriwoyo - Duwet (Section-1)
Contractor: PT Hutama Karya
Fully implemented
(Mr Siswoyo)
Fully implemented
CW-03 Wawar - Congot
Contractors: PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala
Pratama, Tbk
Fully implemented
(Mr Banon Andoko)
Fully implemented
East Java
CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendangbiru
Contractor: PT. Hutama Karya
Fully implemented
(Mr Hardian Yudi)
Fully implemented
West Kalimantan
CW-05: Sosok – Tayan; and Tanjung –
Batas Kota
Contractors: Joint operation of PT Yasa
Patria Perkasa and PT Budi Bakti Prima
Fully implemented
(Mr Julius Manglaia)
Fully implemented
CW-06: Tebas – Singkawang (Section 1 &
2); Sambas Bypass; and Galing – Tanjung
Harapan
Contractors: Joint operation of PT Brantas
Abipraya, PT Tri Citra Perdana and PT Trifa
Abadi
Fully implemented
(Mr Rara Ade Rohmah Sari)
Fully implemented
CW-07: Simpang Tanjung - Galing; Aruk
(Batas Sarawak) – Simpang Tanjung
Contractors: Joint operation PT Waskita
Karya and PT Yala Patria Perkasa
Fully implemented
(Mr Hendrik Prasetio)
Fully implemented
North Kalimantan
CW-08: Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga
Tanjung Palas; and Simpang Tiga Tanjung
Palas - Sekatak Buji (Section 1)
Contractor: PT Waskita Karya
Not implemented Not implemented
CW-09: Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas -
Sekatak Buji (Section 2)
Contractors: Joint operation of PT Brantas
Abipraya and PT Mahir Jaya Mahakam Raya
Not implemented Not implemented
CW-10: Simpang Tiga Apas - Simanggaris
(Section1)
Contractors: Joint operation of PT
Pembangunan Perumahan and PT Perdasa
Not implemented Not implemented
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
33
Contractors
Status in 2015
Recruitment of
Environmental, Health and
Safety Manager
Sufficient funding and
human resources
CW-11: Simpang Tiga Apas - Simanggaris
(Section 2); and Simanggaris – Batas
Negara (Serudong)
Contractor: Halla Corporation
Not implemented Not implemented
3.2. Status of Monthly Environmental Report Submission
24. The DSC-1, responsible for the execution of the CW packages in West and North
Kalimantan, started to submit the Monthly Environmental Reports on May 2015 although
the construction work have already started on much earlier dates as shown in Table 11.
construction start date. The DSC-2, responsible for the execution of CW packages in
Central Java did not submit the Monthly Environmental Reports in 2015 notwithstanding
that construction works have already started for several months. The DSC-3, responsible
for the execution of CW packages in East Java did not submit the monthly environmental
reports from 2014 up to April 2015.
Table 11: Detailed Status of Monthly Environmental Report Submissions
PackageConstruction Start
DateDSC Status in 2015
Central Java
CW-01 3 Aug 2015
DSC-2
No report submitted by DSC
CW-02 23 Jul 2015 No report submitted by DSC
CW-03 June 2015 No report submitted by DSC
East Java
CW-04 18 Oct 2013 DSC-3 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015
West Kalimantan
DSC- 1
CW-05 15 Jun 2015 Complete submission for 2015
CW-06 17 Dec 2013 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015
CW-07 4 Dec 2013 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015
North Kalimantan
CW-08 12 Dec 2014 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015
CW-09 4 Sep 2014 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015
CW-10 10 Jul 2014 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015
CW-11 1 Oct 2014 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
34
3.3. Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures
25. The status of environmental mitigation measures implemented by the RRDP contractors
as required by the EMP are summarized in Appendix A. The information presented in this
table is based on the monthly environmental monitoring reports submitted by the DSC. It
is noted that these monthly reports are not regularly submitted by the DSC to CTC. Where
complete information is not available due to the significant absence of monthly
environmental reports, the implementation of the mitigation measures is therefore
considered “Not implemented.” Appendix B presents the environmental baseline and
monitoring results available for the CW construction packages in West Kalimantan. No
similar results were reported for those in Central and East Java as well as North
Kalimantan. Appendix C presents the photographs undertaken at the time of the Project
Mission and/or CTC site visit.
3.4. ADB Review Missions and CTC Site Inspections
26. ADB Project Review Missions with the participation of the CTC were undertaken to review
the implementation of the overall projects and progress as well as environmental
mitigation. The ADB Midterm Review Mission was undertaken from 23 September to 11
November 2014 and the ADB Project Review Mission from 15 September to 12 November
2015. CTC site inspections were also conducted independently in 2014 to assess the
implementation of environmental mitigation measures and monitoring undertaken by the
Contractors associated with the implementation of the eleven (11) RRDP’s construction
packages. No CTC site visits were done in 2015 as its Environmental Specialist have
resigned and have not been replaced in that year. Table 12 present the ADB Missions and
CTC visits undertaken in 2015
27. The outcomes and notes resulting from the mentioned missions and site visits that require
corrective actions and follow-ups are recorded and summarized in Tables 13 and 14.
Table 12: ADB Review Mission and CTC Inspection
Package No. Mission/Inspection Date
Central Java
CW-01: Tambak Mulyo – Wawar ADB Project Review Mission 2015
CW-02: Giriwoyo - Duwet (Section-1) ADB Project Review Mission 2015
CW-03: Wawar - Congot ADB Project Review Mission 2015
East Java
CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendangbiru ADB Mid-term Project Review Mission 2014
ADB Project Review Mission 2015
CTC Site Visit (12 – 14 May 2014)
West Kalimantan
CW-05:
• Sosok – Tayan
• Tanjung - Batas Kota Sanggau
ADB Mid-term Project Review Mission 2014
ADB Project Review Mission 2015
CW-06: CTC Site Visit (19 – 22 May 2014)
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
35
Package No. Mission/Inspection Date
• Singkawang overlay
• Tebas - Singkawang (Section 1 & 2)
• Sambas Bypass
• Galing - Tanjung Harapan
CTC Site Visit (16 – 20 September 2014)
ADB Mid-term Project Review Mission 2014
ADB Project Review Mission 2015
CW-07:
• Simpang Tanjung - Galing
• Aruk (Batas Sarawak) -Simpang Tanjung
CTC Site Inspection (19 – 22 May 2014)
CTC Site Visit (16 – 20 September 2014)
ADB Mid-term Project Review Mission 2014
ADB Project Review Mission 2015
North Kalimantan
CW-08:
• Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas
• Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji
(Section 1
CTC Site Visit
(10 – 14 November 2014)
ADB Mid-term Project Review Mission 2014
ADB Project Review Mission 2015
CW-09:
• Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji
(Section2)
CTC Site Visit
(10 – 14 November 2014)
ADB Mid-term Project Review Mission 2014
ADB Project Review Mission 2015
CW-10:
• Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris (Section-1)
• Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris (Section-2)
CTC Site Visit
(10 – 14 November 2014)
ADB Mid-term Project Review Mission 2014
ADB Project Review Mission 2015
CW-11:
Simanggaris - Batas Negara (Serudong)
CTC Site Visit
(10 – 14 November 2014)
ADB Mid-term Project Review Mission 2014
ADB Project Review Mission 2015
3.5. Non-compliances and Corrective Action Plans
28. The status of the non-compliances and corrective action plans, both immediate and long-
term (preventive) and due dates, as identified based on the ADB Review Missions and
CTC site inspection, are shown in Table 13. Non-compliances that require immediate
action have already been addressed. This will have to go through the review and approval
process of the GOI and ADB.
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
36
Table 13: Non-Compliances and Corrective/Preventive Actions Identified in 2015
Mission/
Inspection
Date
Description of
Non-ComplianceProject Package/Location
Immediate
Corrective
Action/s
Status
Long Term
Preventive
Action/s
Due Date Status
September
- December
2015
Landslide prone
areas at the
specified locations.
East Java
• CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendang Biru on
STA 18 and STA 19 + 600 (right)
West Kalimantan
• CW-05: Sosok – Tayan on STA
33+850, STA 32+800, STA 32+500,
• CW-05: Sp Tanjung Bts Kota Sanggau
on STA 30+500, STA 29+200, STA
28+100, STA 20+200 and STA 13+200
• CW-07: Galing – Simpang Tanjung) on
STA 26+575, STA 28+325, STA
28+550 and STA 29+235 STA 33+850,
STA 32+800, STA 32+500, STA
30+500
North Kalimantan
• CW-08: Tanjung Palas – Sekatak Buji
(Section 1) on STA 16+000 – 16+60
• CW-08: Tanjung Palas – Sekatak Buji
(Section 2) on Pimping village
• CW-10: Simpang Tiga Apas –
Simanggaris
• CW-11: Simpang Tiga Apas –
Simanggaris, Simanggaris Batas
Negara
Put appropriate
traffic signs to warn
motorists.
Implemented for all
specified locations
The Contractor to
reassess the slope
protection
measures and
redesign if
necessary for
approval by the
DSC and DGH.
April 2016 To be
reported in
2016
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
37
Mission/
Inspection
Date
Description of
Non-ComplianceProject Package/Location
Immediate
Corrective
Action/s
Status
Long Term
Preventive
Action/s
Due Date Status
September
- December
2015
A considerable
number of unused
asphalt contained
in drums are
leaking asphalt to
the soil.
East Java
• CW-04 AMP
West Kalimantan
• CW-05 AMP
• CW-06 AMP
• CW-07 AMP
DSC to advise
Contractors to
store asphalt
drums in one
location with
impermeable
flooring.
Not implemented Prepare Action
Plan for Asphalt
Drum Handling and
Spilled Asphalt
Disposal.
April 2016 To be
reported in
2016
September
- December
2015
Dusty conditions
from ongoing road
works and
movement of trucks
and heavy
equipment
Central Java
• CW-01: Tambak Mulyo – Wawar
• CW-02: Wonogiri – Duwet
• CW-03: Wawar – Congot
East Java
• CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendang Biru
West Kalimantan
• CW-05: Sosok – Tayan, Simpang
Tanjung – Batas Kota Sanggau,
• CW-06: Singkawang – Tebas (Section
1 and Section 2), Sambas – Tanjung
Harapan, Tanjung Harapan –Galing
• CW-07: Galing – Simpang Tanjung
North Kalimantan
• CW-08: Tanjung Selor – Sekatak Buji
(Section 1)
• CW-09: Tanjung Palas – Sekatak Buji
(Section 2)
• CW-10: Simpang Tiga Apas –
Simanggaris (Section1)
• Increase
monitoring
frequency from
spot checks to
constant visual
monitoring
• Increase
watering
frequency from
once a day to
twice daily at the
minimum with
standby water
trucks especially
during hot days.
• Prioritize
watering
activities in
sensitive areas
(e.g. schools,
religious places,
commercial and
residential areas)
Implemented for all
specified locations
(ongoing)
- - -
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
38
Mission/
Inspection
Date
Description of
Non-ComplianceProject Package/Location
Immediate
Corrective
Action/s
Status
Long Term
Preventive
Action/s
Due Date Status
• CW-11: Simpang Tiga Apas –
Simanggaris (Section 2), Simanggaris –
Serudong /Batas Negara
September
- December
2015
Drainage
construction works
has caused traffic.
No traffic signs
installed.
East Java
CW-04 at STA 2 + 150 - STA 2 + 225
Install the
appropriate traffic
signs
Implemented - - -
September
- December
2015
Not enough lighting
at the bridge
construction work
site.
East Java
CW-04: On the bridge at Wonogiri
• Install sufficient
lighting to
illuminate and
warn on the road
hazards at the
bridge
• Install
appropriate
traffic/warning
signs
Implemented - - -
September
- December
2015
Obstruction at the
box culvert which
obstructs water
flow and can be
cause of overflow
to the asphalt
pavement.
East Java
CW-04: Box Culvert in STA 2 + 275
covered mounds of earth so that during
heavy rains the water can flow to the
asphalt surface and box culvert not
functioning properly.
Remove
obstruction to allow
the free flow of
water at the box
culvert.
Implemented - - -
September
- December
2015
No traffic road
block/sign at an
intersection where
works are ongoing,
causing confusion
to motorists
East Java
CW-04: Intersection at the STA 00 + 000
Install appropriate
road blocks and
warning signs
Implemented - - -
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
39
Mission/
Inspection
Date
Description of
Non-ComplianceProject Package/Location
Immediate
Corrective
Action/s
Status
Long Term
Preventive
Action/s
Due Date Status
September
- December
2015
No traffic signs
installed to warn
that works are
ongoing
East Java
CW-04: Along alignment of Jolosutro –
Sendangbiru
Install appropriate
warning signs
Implemented - - -
September
- December
2015
Accumulation of
water at the
intersection of two
downward slopes
(basin).
East Java
• CW-04: Between STA 00 + 250 to STA
00 + 300
• CW-04: In the STA 00 + 325, STA 1 +
850, 2 + 800, 21 + 297
• CW-04: STA 02+200
Temporarily divert
the flow of water
Implemented for all
locations
The Contractor to
reassess the road
design and
redesign if
necessary for
approval by the
DSC and DGH.
April 2016 To be
reported in
2016
March-
August
2015
Dusty conditions
from ongoing road
works and
movement of trucks
and heavy
equipment
East Java
• CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendang Biru -
STA 15 + 800 to STA16 + 050
West Kalimantan
• CW-05: Sosok – Tayan, Simpang
Tanjung – Batas Kota Sanggau
• CW-06: Singkawang – Tebas (Section
1 and Section 2), Sambas – Tanjung
Harapan, Tanjung Harapan –Galing
• CW-07: Galing – Simpang Tanjung
North Kalimantan
• CW-08: Tanjung Selor – Sekatak Buji
(Section 1), Tanjung Palas – Sekatak
Buji (Section 2)
• CW-09: Tanjung Palas – Sekatak Buji
(Section 2)
• CW-10: Simpang 3 Apas –
Simanggaris (Section1)
• Increase
monitoring
frequency from
spot checks to
constant visual
monitoring
• Increase
watering
frequency from
once a day to
twice daily at the
minimum with
standby water
trucks especially
during hot days
• Prioritize
watering
activities in
sensitive areas
(e.g. schools,
religious places,
Implemented for all
locations (ongoing)
- - -
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
40
Mission/
Inspection
Date
Description of
Non-ComplianceProject Package/Location
Immediate
Corrective
Action/s
Status
Long Term
Preventive
Action/s
Due Date Status
• CW-11: Simpang 3 Apas –
Simanggaris (Section 2), Simanggaris –
Serudong /Batas Negara
commercial and
residential areas)
March-
August
2015
The relocation of
21 electricity poles
which will be
affected by the
excavation works
has not yet been
implemented
East Java
CW-04 - Jolosutro – Sendangbiru
• Implement the
relocation of the
poles in
coordination with
the concerned
agencies,
institutions and
local residents
Implemented - - -
September
2014 -
February
2015
Dusty conditions
from ongoing road
works and
movement of trucks
and heavy
equipment
East Java
• CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendang Biru
West Kalimantan
• CW-06: Singkawang – Tebas (Sections
1 and 2), Sambas – Tanjung Harapan,
Tanjung Harapan – Galing
• CW-07: Galing – Simpang Tanjung
North Kalimantan
• CW-08: Tanjung Selor – Sekatak Buji
(Section 1), Tanjung Palas – Sekatak
Buji (Section 2)
• CW-08 and CW-09: Tanjung Selor -
Simpang 3 Tanjung Palas - Sekatak
Buji segments
• CW-09: Tanjung Palas – Sekatak Buji
(Section 2)
• CW-10: Simpang 3 Apas –
Simanggaris (Section1)
• Increase
monitoring
frequency from
spot checks to
constant visual
monitoring
• Increase
watering
frequency from
once a day to
twice daily at the
minimum with
standby water
trucks especially
during hot days.
• Prioritize
watering
activities in
sensitive areas
(e.g. schools,
religious places,
Implemented on all
locations (ongoing)
- - -
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
41
Mission/
Inspection
Date
Description of
Non-ComplianceProject Package/Location
Immediate
Corrective
Action/s
Status
Long Term
Preventive
Action/s
Due Date Status
• CW-11: Simpang 3 Apas –
Simanggaris (Section 2), Simanggaris –
Serudong /Batas Negara
commercial and
residential areas)
March-
August
2014
Drainage
construction work
is temporarily
stopped resulting to
exposed
embankment
East Java
• CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendang Biru
West Kalimantan
• CW-06: Singkawang – Tebas (Sections
1 and 2), Sambas – Tanjung Harapan,
Tanjung Harapan –Galing
• CW-07: Galing – Simpang Tanjung
• Install
appropriate
warning signs
• Resume
construction
work
immediately
Implemented on all
locations (ongoing)
- - -
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
42
3.6. Public Consultations
29. The Public Consultations with the affected stakeholders were conducted between
September 2008 to August 2011 during the project preparation for the different project
work packages of the RRDP. The outcomes of this Public Consultations are documented
in the IEE document.
30. No formal public consultation or public meeting associated with RRDP was reported in the
DSC’s monthly reports submitted for the period of January to December 2015. However,
as per information verbally conveyed by the Contractors, informal talks between the
employees of the contractors and local communities on general matters of concern relative
to RRDP implementation were conducted, but not documented.
3.7. Public Complaints/Grievances and Resolutions
31. Five (5) complaints from the local community were registered in 2015. These complaints
were directly related to the ongoing construction activities in West Kalimantan and East
Java as presented in Table 14. These complaints have been followed up and the
corresponding status is presented in the following table.
Table 14: Complaints/ Grievances Recorded in 2015
Date Package Complaints Action Required Status
West Kalimantan
June 2015 CW-06: Tebas –
Singkawang
(near the junior
high school/SMP
4 Singkawang
Dust pollution Constant monitoring
and prompt watering
when high dust level
is observed
Completed, and the
action is undertaken
as ongoing effort.
Garbage Maintain cleanliness
onsite and provide
trash bags/cans
Completed, and the
action is undertaken
as ongoing effort.
Improvement of traffic
signs
Install appropriate
traffic signs
Completed, and the
traffic signs installed
CW-06: Tebas –
Singkawang
Flow of mud into the
road due to
embankment caused
by the ongoing
drainage works
Install barriers to
prevent flow of mud
to the road while
waiting for collection
trucks
Completed, and the
action is undertaken
as ongoing effort.
Prompt collections
of excavation waste
materials
Completed, and the
action is undertaken
as ongoing effort.
East Java
September
2015
CW-04: Jolosutro
– Sendangbiru at
STA 1+833 and
STA 2+000
Request of villagers to
reinstall the removed
culverts as soon as
possible to discharge
water into the cave
that serves as drain
and water sources for
Hamlet Sendangbiru
Schedule as soon
as possible the
installation of
culverts/drain
Completed
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
43
32. The role of the local community is very important during the implementation of project
activities. Hence, the village heads are expected to be well informed and involved in the
monitoring of the implementation of the environmental mitigation measures and respective
monitoring. Any complaints and/or grievances should be reported to the Head of the
Village for resolution. If the grievance/complaint is not resolved at the level of the Village
Head, the same will be forwarded to the Implementation Unit (PIU)/PPK. The DSC through
the Environment and/or Resettlement Engineer will assist the PIU/PPK to resolve the
grievance/complaint. If it is still not resolved at the level of the PIU/PPK, the
grievance/complaint will then be referred to the Balai (Regional Implementing Agency),
which will be assisted by the respective DSC, Kasatker and PPK for final resolution. This
grievance redress mechanism is show in Figure 8.
Figure 8: Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM)
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
44
PART IV: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1. Conclusions
33. This AEMR 2015 of the RRDP is compiled for the submission to ADB. This AEMR presents
the status of environmental monitoring and mitigation measures (as specified in the IEE)
undertaken by the contractors and DSCs working for the Regional Roads Development
Project in Central and East Java as well as West and North Kalimantan in 2015. The
conclusions drawn from this AEMR are presented in the following.
34. The AMDAL and UKL-UPL approvals and/or Environmental Permits as the GOI’s
mandatory requirements exist for the road construction in Central Java, West and North
Kalimantan. However, there are no records indicating that this environmental approval and
permit exist for the CW-04 road construction (East Java) and for parts of the CW-06 road
construction (West Kalimantan), and therefore confirmation with this regard is required.
35. The UKL-UPL approvals and/or Environmental Permits have been secured for some
asphalt mixing plants and quarries/borrow pits operated by the contractors/sub-contractors
working for the road construction in West Kalimantan and Central Java. However, there
are no records indicating that this environmental approval and permit exist for the
mentioned facilities operated for the road construction in North Kalimantan and East Java.
36. The proposed addition of the 12.3 km Sambas - Tanjung Harapan road section, located in
Sambas District of West Kalimantan Province, requires the preparation of a new
environmental approval and permit. The road design was being undertaken, and therefore
the preparation of the environmental approval and permit had not been confirmed in 2015.
37. Baseline environmental sampling and periodic environmental monitoring during the
construction phase, as required by the IEE, have not been conducted by the DSCs due to
the absence of their respective Environmental Specialist at that time.
38. The conduct of environmental monitoring, as specified in the IEE, has been partial by the
DSCs due the absence of their respective Environmental Specialist and incomplete
record/monthly reports indicating whether the monitoring has been regularly conducted
and the results reported. The inability to submit the required Monthly Environmental
Reports can be attributed to the failure of some of the Contractors and the DSC to hire
their Environmental Officers.
39. Most of the responsibilities of the Directorate General of Highways, SDEA, Project
Management Unit, and Core Team Consultants to implement the EMP have been
undertaken. Only few of them are either not yet implemented or partially implemented due
to changes in the RRDP organization and some scope of works not defined in the
ToR/Contract.
40. There are considerable gaps reported for the DSCs and their respective contractors in
fulfilling their responsibilities on the EMP due to the absence of their respective
environmental specialists/officers and incomplete records indicating whether the
implementation of the EMP responsibilities have been undertaken.
41. ADB Project Review Missions were conducted in 2014 and 2015 to review the
implementation and progress of the RRDP. CTC accompanied the Missions and
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
45
conducted its own inspections in 2014. CTC did not undertake the site inspection in 2015
as its Environmental Specialist resigned in that year. Non-conformances and
corresponding corrective actions were identified and followed up for those requiring
immediate actions. Some corrective actions are implemented as ongoing activity as part
of the construction activity.
42. Five (5) community complaints were reported and followed up in 2015 and these related
to the construction activities in West Kalimantan and East Java. The complaints were
associated with airborne dust, garbage, Improvement of traffic signs, mud overflow onto
the road, and request of villagers to reinstall the removed culverts. No community
grievance redress mechanism was reported for 2015
4.2. Recommendations
43. Based on the aforementioned conclusions of the 2015 AEMR report, the following
recommendations are presented in this report.
44. The absence of AMDAL and UKL-UPL approval as well as Environmental Permit for the
road construction works, asphalt mixing plants and quarries/borrow pits identified in this
report should be confirmed in the next reporting.
45. The conduct of monitoring for ambient air quality, surface water quality and noise level as
required in the IEE of RRDP should be prioritized by the DSCs to enable assessment of
the impact of the ongoing works on the quality of the environment. This is applicable for
those work packages with baseline data. For work packages without baseline data, the
results can be compared with the statutory standards.
46. The DSCs should immediately hire their respective Environmental Specialists to undertake
their obligations for an informed and consistent implementation of the environmental
monitoring and mitigation measures as well as submitting the monthly environmental
monitoring report in a regular and timely manner; and the DSC should improve supervision
of the Contractors on strictly implementation of the mitigation measures.
47. The DSC should monitor compliance of the Contractors to government requirements for
the UKL-UPL of the asphalt mixing plants and quarries to be included in the Monthly
Environmental Reports as well as for the AMDAL of some road sections.
48. The Contractors should be consistent in implementing mitigation measures and
conducting regular orientation for the workers on good housekeeping practices, especially
in the asphalt mixing plants.
49. The Monthly Environmental Reports, submitted by the DSC to PMU and CTC, should not
only contain the DGH’s checklist of environmental mitigation and monitoring, but also
updates on the following:
• recent status of immediate corrective actions taken to observed non-compliances and
the status of action plans for non-compliances with long term preventive actions
taking into consideration the due dates indicated;
• the existence of the AMDAL and UKL-UPL approvals as well as Environmental
Permits that have not been identified for the work packages in East Java, West and
2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)
46
North Kalimantan;
• develop notes/documentation on meetings and consultations with stakeholders
including courtesy calls and informal discussions with Village Chiefs and/or the local
government and other stakeholders and government offices; and
• properly document any complaints and grievances including follow-up actions.
Issue / PotentialImpact
Mitigation measuresDSC3 DSC-1
CW -04 CW-05 CW-06 CW-07 CW-08 CW-09 CW-10 CW-11
1. Soil and Material
Issue:
Utilization of
productive land
Potential impact:
Loss of fertility of
arable land
(i) At construction sites and other areas affected by project
activities, the topsoil (about 15 cm) will be kept and refilled after
excavation is over to minimize the impact on productive lands.
F F F F F F F F
(ii) It may be necessary to construct new access roads to aggregate
sites, and place them through agricultural lands. These
temporary roads will be made along existing farm tracks so as to
avoid losses to agricultural lands.
F F F F F F F F
(iii) Contractors shall present proposed construction road alignments
and hauling schedule for approval by the DSC before
construction is to commence.F F F F F F F F
(iv) In unavoidable circumstances, suitable compensation will be paid
to people whose land will be temporarily acquired for the duration
of the operations. The compensation will cover for loss of income
for the duration of acquisition and land restoration.
F F F F F F F F
(v) Contractors shall avoid as much as possible, usage of productive
agricultural land. If such land is used, the contractor shall restore
them to their original state after completion of civil works.F F F F F F F F
Issue:
Reclaimedpavement
Potential impact:
Generation ofspoils/solid waste
(i) Contractors will be encouraged to recycle reclaimed asphalt
pavement in cold mixes or aggregate in granular or stabilized
surface material for subgrade and base layers and village access
road maintenance and to use recyclable materials as much as
possible. The material that cannot be reused will be taken to
specific official waste dumping sites approved by the Bapedalda.
N N N N N N N N
(ii) All suitable material obtained from roadway excavation work will
be used for construction of embankment/ earthen shoulders. P F F F F F F
Appendix A: Implementation of Environmental Mitigation Measures – Construction
Phase ( “F” – Fully Implemented “P” – Partially Implemented “N” – Not Implemented )
Issue:
Soil erosion
Potential impact:High suspendedsolid contents ofriver, sedimentation.
(i) Erosion control and slope stabilization measures shall be
provided such as: (a) side ditches and berms, rock lining and
slope walls along the road, where appropriate. (b) proper
drainage system (c) shrub buffer strips sites in areas of high
erosion risk (d) cross drainage to accommodate floodwater/run-
off in case subproject roads are on elevated fills that will obstruct
natural drainage.
F N F F F F F F
(ii) On hill slopes and other potentially erodible places along the
roadside, appropriate vegetation that retards erosion will be
planted.F F F F F F F F
(iii) On sections with filling and cutting, the slopes will be protected by
mild slope and planted with appropriate vegetation.N N N N N N N N
(iv) As much as possible, construction activities in hilly areas are to
be undertaken during dry season only.N N N N N N N N
Issue:
Spoils Disposal andstockpiling ofconstructionmaterials
Potential impact:
Damage toproductive land,deterioration ofwater quality andobstruction ofwatercourses
(i) Spoils shall only be disposed to areas approved by local
authority.F F N N N N N N
(ii) Spoil disposal shall not cause sedimentation and obstruction of
flow of watercourses, damage to agricultural land and densely
vegetated areas.F F N N N N N N
(iii) The spoils disposal site shall be located at least 50 m from
surface water courses and shall be protected from erosion by
avoiding formation of steep slopes and grassing.F F N N N N N N
(iv) Water courses (rivers, canals, etc.) shall be kept free of
excavation spoil and construction debris, floating and submerged.N N N N N N N N
(v) Spoil and construction materials stockpile area shall be located
away from waterbodies and under no circumstances will these
materials be dumped into watercourses.N N N N N N N N
Issue:
Slope Stability
Potential impact:
(i) A balanced cut and fill approach will be designed for each road
link. Excess cut, if any, will be used to shape the embankment
side slopes, strengthening the toe of the high slopes road bench
and filling the low lying public lands and for plantation in pre-
approved areas.
N N N N N N N N
Erosion andlandslides
(ii) Embankments shall be monitored during construction for signs of
erosion; long-term material stockpiles will be covered to prevent
wind erosion.N N N N N N N N
(iii) Retaining structures will be constructed for protection of slopes
from landslides and existing vegetation cover shall be left
undisturbed during construction whenever possible.N N N N N N N N
(iv) Removal of vegetation and cutting of trees will be done
judiciously and limited to minimum possible extent.N N N N N N N N
(v) Vegetative cover shall be provided on slopes by planting grass
and creepers on erosion and landslide prone sections.N N N N N N N N
(vi) To the extent feasible, the length and steepness of cut and fill
slopes will be minimized particularly at borrow, quarry and spoil
sites.N N N N N N N N
(vii) Silt dikes and runoff ditches will be installed where appropriate to
prevent silt from entering farmland and water bodies.N N N N N N N N
2. Water
Issue:
Construction ofbridges/drainagestructures instreams/rivers
Potential impact:
Flood, inundation,mudflow, pollution,and adverse effectson runoff flowpattern
(i) Drainage works shall be constructed as designed based on the
historical flood data and flood forecasting.N N N N N N N N
(ii) Ensure bridge works shall not cause obstruction of river flow and
flooding of adjacent area.N N N N N N N N
(iii) In sections along rivers and streams, earth and stones will be
properly disposed of so that they do not block rivers and streams,
resulting in adverse impact on water quality and flow regime.N N N N N N N N
(iv) Slope stabilization measures (e.g., planting of fast growing native
species of grass and shrubs, etc.) shall be implemented on
exposed surfaces along river embankments to reduce material
wash-away material.
N N N N N N N N
(v) Cofferdams, silt fences, sediment barriers or other appropriate
devices shall be provided during bridge works to prevent
migration of silt during excavation and boring operations within
streams. Dewatering and cleaning of cofferdams will be
performed to prevent siltation by pumping from cofferdams to a
N N N N N N N N
settling basin or a containment unit.
(vi) In bridge demolition sites, efforts will be made to avoid "dropping
the bridge" into rivers/streams. This will be done by "sawing"
appropriate sections of the bridge and using cranes to lift these
sections away, or alternatively by construction of a platform onto
which the bridge could be dropped.
N N N N N N N N
Issue: Siltation
Potential impact:
Deterioration ofsurface water quality
(i) Provide slope stabilization measures on exposed surfaces by
planting grass and creepers and implementation of other suitable
measures to reduce washing away of materials.N N N N N N N N
(ii) Construction materials containing fine particles, e.g. limestone or
laterite, shall be stored in an enclosure such that sediment laden
water does not drain into nearby watercourses, but rather
percolates slowly into the soil.
N N N N N N N N
(iii) Sediment laden construction water will be discharged into settling
lagoons or tanks prior to final discharge.N N N N N N N N
(iv) Construct retaining structures such as gabion baskets, rip-rap,
etc. for river bank protection.N N N N N N N N
Issue:
Spills from BitumenPlants
Potential impact:
Contamination ofwater table orsurface drainage –could come fromspilled bitumen orpetroleum productsused to thin thebitumen. Bitumen isstored in drumswhich may leak orwhich are oftenpunctured duringhandling after longperiods (> 6 months
(i) Bitumen shall not be allowed to enter either running or dry
streambeds and nor will be disposed of in ditches or small waste
disposal sites prepared by the contractor.P F F P P P P P
(ii) Bitumen storage and mixing areas as well as storage areas for
other petroleum products used in the preparation of the bitumen
mixture shall be protected against spills and all contaminated soil
must be properly handled according to national and local
regulations. As a minimum, these areas must be provided with
concrete flooring and surrounded by an embankment to readily
contain and clean-up spills.P F F P P P P P
in the elements) ofstorage.
3. Air, Noise, andVibration
Issue:
Air pollution
Potential impact:
Gaseous and dustemissions causinghealth hazard toworkers and nearbyresidents.
(i) The contractor will submit a dust suppression program prior to
construction. The plan will detail action to be taken to minimize
dust generation including specific locations, schedule, etc. (e.g.,
spraying of roads with water, vegetation cover in borrow sites),
and will identify equipment to be used.
F F F F F F F
(ii) Construction equipment will be maintained to a good standard
and idling of engines will be discouraged. Machinery causing
excessive pollution (e.g., visible smoke) will be banned from
construction sites.
F F F F F F F F
(iii) All construction equipment and vehicles shall have valid
certifications indicating compliance to vehicle emission
standards.F F F F F F F F
(iv) Siting of asphalt plants will be more than 1 km of settlements and
other sensitive receptors (schools, hospitals, etc.)F F F F F F F F
(v) Necessary environmental clearance shall be obtained prior to
establishment and operation of asphalt mixing plants. N N N N N N N N
(vi) On rainless day undertake watering, at least twice per day, on
dusty and exposed areas at construction yards, materials
stockpile, construction sites, access roads, quarry areas, borrow
sites and other project areas where residential sites and other
sensitive receptors are located nearby.
F F F F F F F F
(vii) Mixing and crushing plants/operations will be equipped with dust
suppression devices such as water sprays. Operators will wear
dust masks and ear protection.F F F F F F F F
(viii)Tightly cover trucks transporting construction materials (sand,
soil, cement, gravel, etc.) to avoid or minimize spills and dust
emission.F F F P P P P P
(ix) Impose speed limits on construction vehicles to minimize dust
emission along areas where sensitive receptors are located
(houses, schools, hospitals, etc.).F F F F F F F F
Issue:
Noise and vibrationfrom constructionactivities
Potential impact:
Disturbance/
nuisance tosettlements andother sensitivereceptors.
(i) As much as possible, locate high vibration generation sources
over 50m from residential sites and other structures.N N N N N N N N
(ii) Regularly maintain and repair construction machinery and
vehicles to keep these in good condition.F F F F F F F F
(iii) Noisy construction activities shall be stopped from 21:00 to 06:00
in areas where sensitive receptors such as settlements, hospital,
etc. will be affected.F F F F F F F F
(iv) Inspection will be done before construction equipment enter into
construction sites to ensure that these are in good condition and
are fitted with suitable noise suppression devices.P P P P P P P P
(v) Impose speed limits on construction vehicles to minimize noise
emission along areas where sensitive receptors are located
(houses, schools, hospitals, etc.).F F F F F F F F
(vi) Install noise control walls (3.0 - 4.5m high, thick materials) at high
noise sources that affect sensitive receptors (hospital, schools,
etc.).N N N N N N N N
(vii) Provide workers near sources of loud noise with protection
devices such as ear plugs.N N N N N N N N
Issue:
Rock blasting
Potential impact:
Explosion and noise
(i) Blasting will be carried out only with permission of Bapedalda and
other concerned agencies, using a pre-established schedule.N N N N N N N N
(ii) All the statutory laws, regulation, rules etc., pertaining to
acquisition, transport, storage, handling and use of explosives will
be strictly followed.N N N N N N N N
(iii) The timing will be made available to the local people within 500m
of the blasting site in all directions, depending on the total charge
used.N N N N N N N N
(iv) Blasting will be held only during day time and shall be carried out
not using high powered explosives.N N N N N N N N
(v) W here possible blasting mats will be used to reduce noise levels
when blasting is carried out.N N N N N N N N
4. Quarry andBorrow Sites
N N N N N N N
Issue:
Operation of quarryand borrow areas
Potential impact:
Loss of topsoil anddisfigurement oflandscape, dust andair pollution, healthand safety risks
(i) The maximum gradient after refurbishment of each borrow/quarry
slope shall not exceed as average value 1:3. After implementing
terraces and drainage system, vegetation cover shall be provided
by seeding grass and planting both bushes and trees.
N N N N N N N N
(ii) Upon completion of extraction activities, quarry and borrow pits
shall be dewatered and fences shall be installed, as appropriate,
to minimize health and safety risks.N N N N N N N N
(iii) Quarry areas and borrow pits will be left in a tidy state with stable
side slopes and proper drainage in order to avoid erosionN N N N N N N N
(iv) To avoid drowning when pits become water-filled, measures such
as fencing, providing flotation devices such as a buoy tied to a
rope, etc. shall be implemented.N N N N N N N N
5. HazardousSubstances Waste
Issue:
Storage ofhydrocarbon, toxic,and explosivechemicals
Potential impact:
Contamination fromharmful and toxicchemicals (paints,fuel and lubricants,oils and explosives).
(i) Hydrocarbon, toxic material and explosives will be stored in
designated sites. Vehicle maintenance and refueling will be
confined to areas in construction sites designed to contain spilled
lubricants and fuels.
F F F F F F F F
(ii) Spill waste will be disposed at approved disposal sites. F F F F F F F F
(iii) Adequate precaution will be taken to prevent
oil/lubricant/hydrocarbon contamination of channel beds. Spillage
if any will be immediately cleared with utmost caution to leave no
traces.
F F F F F F F F
(iv) All areas intended for storage of hazardous materials will be
quarantined and provided with adequate facilities to combat
emergency situations complying with all the applicable statutory
F F F F F F F F
stipulation.
(v) The personnel in-charge of these sites will be properly trained
and these areas will be access controlled and entry will be
allowed only under authorization.F F F F F F F F
(vi) Store fuel and hazardous substances in paved areas with roof
and embankment. If spills or leaks do occur, undertake
immediate clean up.F F F F F F F F
(vii) Ensure availability of spill clean-up materials (e.g., absorbent
pads, etc.) specifically designed for petroleum products and other
hazardous substances where such materials are being stored.F F F F F F F F
(viii)Segregate hazardous wastes (oily wastes, used batteries, fuel
drums) and ensure that storage, transport and disposal shall not
cause pollution and shall be undertaken consistent with national
and local regulations.
F F F F F F F F
(ix) Ensure all storage containers are in good condition with proper
labeling.F F F F F F F F
(x) Regularly check containers for leakage and undertake necessary
repair or replacement.F F F F F F F F
(xi) Store hazardous materials above flood level. F F F F F F F F
(xii) Equipment maintenance and refueling areas shall be provided
with drainage leading to an oil-water separator that will be
regularly skimmed of oil and maintained to ensure efficiency.F F F F F F F F
(xiii)Discharge of oil contaminated water shall be prohibited. F F F F F F F F
Issue:
Solid waste fromcontractor’s yardand constructioncamps
Potential impact:
Contamination fromsolid waste
(i) Solid wastes/garbage will be collected in bins and disposed ofregularly to sites approved or licensed by local authorities,according to a brief and basic waste management plan preparedby the contractor and approved by DSC, prior to thecommencement of civil works.
F F F F F F F F
(ii) Prohibit burning of construction and domestic wastes. F F F F F F F F
(iii) Do not permit disposal of solid wastes into canals, rivers, otherwatercourses, agricultural field and public areas. Disposal shallonly be to areas approved/licensed by local authorities.
F F F F F F F F
(iv) Properly collect and segregate solid wastes at worker campsand construction sites. Use rubbish bins for containing domesticsolid wastes
F F F F F F F F
(v) Segregate reusable and recyclable wastes. F F F F F F F F
(vi) All worn out parts, equipment and empty containers ofhazardous substances (oil, paint, lubricant, bitumen, etc.) mustbe removed from the site to a proper storage locationdesignated by PMU/DSC.
F F F F F F F F
(vii) There will be no site-specific landfills established by thecontractors. All solid waste will be collected and removed fromthe work camps and disposed in local waste disposal sites.
F F F F F F F F
6. EcologicalEnvironment
Issue:
Flora
Potential impact:
Damage tovegetation
(i) A tree-cutting and replanting scheme will be prepared within the
first four months of the start of civil works to compensate for
cleared areas during construction.N N N N N N N N
(ii) Orientation will be provided to the workers on proper
implementation of mitigation measures to protect the
environment.N N N N N N N N
(iii) The contractor shall prohibit cutting of trees for firewood and for
use in for construction-related activitiesN N N N N N N N
(iv) Vegetative cover (e.g., grasses and shrubs) stripped from the
construction sites will be used for landslide and slope protection.N N N N N N N N
(v) Construction vehicles will operate within the corridor of impact,
i.e., approximately within ROW, to avoid damaging soil and
vegetation. It will be most important to avoid soil compaction
around trees. Generally, the rule will be to avoid driving heavy
equipment or trucks anywhere into the ’drip-line’ of a tree (defined
as imaginary line around a tree where rainwater falls freely to
ground unimpeded by the tree’s foliage).
N N N N N N N N
(vi) No trees will be removed without prior approval of Bapedalda. N N N N N N N N
(vii) The contractor will not use or permit the use of wood as a fuel for
the execution of any part of the Works, including but not limited to
the heating of bitumen and bitumen mixtures, and to the extent
N N N N N N N N
practicable shall ensure that fuels other than wood are used for
cooking, and water heating in all his camps and living
accommodations
(viii)Contractor shall not buy or use wood from the illegal sources
(that come from the illegal logging)N N N N N N N N
(ix) No construction camps, asphalt mixing plants, material storage
sites are to be located in the forest areas.N N N N N N N N
(x) Contractor will take all precautions necessary to ensure that
damage to vegetation is avoided due to fires resulting from
execution of the works. The Contractor will immediately suppress
the fire, if it occurs, and shall undertake replanting to replace
damaged vegetation.
N N N N N N N N
Issue:
Fauna
Potential impact:
Impact on Fauna
(i) Workers shall be prohibited from hunting wild animals. N N N N N N N N
(ii) As much as possible, bridge works will be scheduled in dry
season to minimize adverse impacts to fishery, river water quality
and other aquatic resources.N N N N N N N N
1. Dry stockpile and base coarse material at CW-04. Can cause wind blown dust to affect nearby
residential area.
2. Explosives storage area at package CW-04. The storage area is far from residential areas and
with warning signs.
3. Embankment area at CW-04. There is a need to improve slope protection measures to prevent
landslide and keep the material from encroaching into the adjacent property.
4. Road works and Earthworks (cut and fill, blasting) at CW-04. Permit for spoil disposal area need
to be secured.
5. There is yet no allowed disposal area for excavated materials/spoils for CW-04. Securing of the
necessary permit is still ongoing.
1. No warning signs on dangerous portion of the road (muddy and slippery) where drainage works
are ongoing at CW-06.
2. Insufficient warning signs along road works at CW-06. Traffic management should be
implemented in busy areas.
3. There is yet no allowed disposal area for excavated materials/spoils for CW-06. Securing of the
necessary permit is still ongoing.
1. Insufficient access bridges for residents to their houses (CW-07).
2. There is yet no allowed disposal area for excavated materials/spoils. Securing of the necessary
permit is still ongoing for CW-07.
3. Insufficient warning signs along road and drainage works along CW-07 alignment.
4. Insufficient watering at CW-07. Road is dusty and can affect workers, vegetation and residents in
immediate vicinity.
5. Slopes is high and steep in some work areas at CW-07. Evaluate if necessary to use slope
protection measures to prevent erosion and mitigate impact to adjacent vegetation and for
safety.
Recommended