ELP_SNP2016 - Rev 061416

Engaging Leaders ProgramSenior Nutrition Program – Contribution Process

Project Team: Rita ChardTamara HenryAmanda GallegosJessica L. GonzalezJohnny SanchezWathsna SayasaneJami Spear

Senior Nutrition Meal Programi. Timeline

ii. Background

iii. Research

iv. Data

v. Recommendations

City of Phoenix Senior Nutrition Meal Program (SNMP)

HSD Taskforce requested a raise to contribution• 2007

Program contracted to Selrico Services, Inc.• 2013

Review of Contributions• 2016

COP HSD Contributions Campaign•2008

The Administration on Aging (AoA) Nutrition Meal ProgramCongregate Meal: • A federal program, authorized under Title III &

Title VI to administer grants to programs to deliver congregate and home delivery meals- City of Phoenix dedicates AoA grant funds to home delivery meal program only

• Meals served under the program must be 1/3 of the recommended dietary allowances

Average Budget for Older Adults

Source: The WOW-GI National Elder Economic Security Standard: A Methodology to Determine Economic Security for Elders

Average Healthcare Budget per month in Maricopa County

Couple SinglePoor $1,070 $535Good $724 $362Excellent $538 $269

Phoenix Senior Centers

Senior Center Services

Congregate Meal

Home Delivery Meal Programs Socialization

How Phoenix ComparesCities Surveyed:• Chandler (1)• Gilbert (1)• Glendale (4)• Tempe (2)• Flagstaff (1)• Houston (36)• Austin (9)

How Phoenix Compares

Phoenix Other Cities

# of CentersMandatory ContributionMandatory Membership Avg. # of Meals /day /centerContributions– SuggestedContributions – Actual

15No$20 Annual40$2.50$.71

1 to 36NoNo10 to 85$1 to $4 $.25 to $3

How Phoenix Compares: Commonalities • Satisfaction Level – Generally satisfied• Contributions are:

– Accepted but have declined since 2008– Voluntary– Collected in an anonymous, semi-private

manner• All entities struggle with encouraging

contributions– Greater need, transient population– Rising medical costs– Changing clientele with greater sense of

entitlement

How Phoenix Compares: Differences

Provider For-profit contracted vendor:• Selrico

Non-profit contracted providers:• Chandler Christian

Community Center • YWCA• Tempe Community Action

Agency• Meals on Wheels

Program Funding Source(s)

General Fund • Area Agency on Aging grants• Donations to contracted

nonprofit• United Way• Corporate/Local Businesses• General Fund (Tempe,

Scottsdale)Contributions Set by City of Phoenix Set by contracted provider or

Site Council

Role of City • Manage Selrico contract• Provide 15 host facilities,

including 3 kitchens• Provides funding from

General Fund• Collects contributions (go to

General Fund)

• Manage nonprofit contract/MOU

• Provide/host facilities

Role of Contracted Provider

• Food prep, catering and serving meals

• Secures funding via grants, donations to nonprofits, etc.

• Responsible for federal reporting, if grant funded

• Collect contributions which go directly back into the nonprofit

Survey• March 2016 • 15 Senior

Centers • 500

responses received

Survey Results - Highlights• What would encourage participants to visit

centers more frequently?7 days / week

activities/ classes

better food13%

nothing20%

people7%

time5%

other7%

#responses: 208

Survey Results - Highlights• What would encourage participants to contribute

more per meal?

Con-tribute $2.5022%

Better Food21%

Higher Income13%

Manda-tory18%

Lower Price8%

Nothing5%

Other13%

#responses: 210

RECOMMENDATIONS

Adult Centers: Branding

• Create a revised mission statement that embodies health and well being of adult clients

• Unified Adult Nutrition Program message for all 15 centers, emphasizing positive, healthy, actions in a community

• Consistent contribution donation process• Standardize newsletters; create a fill in template

Solution 1

15 Centers

Nutrition Services

One Outstanding Experience

Strengths Weaknesses

OpportunitiesThreats

Increases client well being when all foster the idea that they can count on one another

Will not affect perceptions about vegetable tenderness or temperature*

Entirely dependent on the possible uncertain actions of clients.

Transparent policies will create a bridge to relationships.

Recruiting VolunteersTraining Leadership

SWOTSolution 1

Request contributions• Send individualized benefit summaries to

participants • Lateral payments build bonds between clients• Enables the purchase of additional programming

(Most often requested item by 2016 surveyed)• Payment by voluntary contribution helps remove

the stigmas of free lunch • Effectively bring services to community achieving

Mission statement • Methods tried: monthly billing for budgeting ease• SWOT Rating : Low Risk

• Reported by the 109th Congress (2005-2006)

Solution 1

Target next procurement process to non-profits and community organizations with experience and similar mission.• Demonstrated best practice• Trend of other cities• Potential to reduce General Fund expense• City becomes host with vendor responsible for

operations

Utilize Community Partnerships

Solution 2

Reduced outputs on the oversight and liability for the program

Loss of long-standing City operational control

Non-responsive / inexperienced proposors

Joins powers of partners to focus on desired results

May scale to larger service operation

SWOTSolution 2

Human Services Foundation

• 501(c)3 designated organization• Community board members with representatives

from Site Council and City ex-officio member

• Alternative revenue source– Fundraising events– Accept donations from private

individuals/organizations– Additional grant opportunities

• Supplement and enhance efforts of HSD

Site Council

Members

Service Provider Experts

Community

Solution 3

SWOTSolution 3

Reduced City oversight with increased external controls

Ease of accepting donations

Resources needed to establish / implement foundation

Improved economic conditions to attract private donations

Human Services Foundation• Fosters collaborative thinking among multiple

stakeholders • Focused efforts and resources to increase funding• Potential to raise greater awareness of human

services needs in Phoenix• Builds on momentum of increasing awareness of

living a healthier lifestyle• Consider time commitment from members and

differing perspectives• SWOT Rating : Low Risk

Solution 3

SummaryProject Challenge• Increase average contribution rate• Raise member awareness regarding cost and

funding of SNMP and Senior Center Programs

3 Recommendations• Branding – Adult Nutrition Program• Utilize Community Partnerships –

Nonprofits/Community organizations• Human Services Foundation – Avenue for

additional funding sources and concentrated focus

Thank you

ELP_SNP2016 - Rev 061416

Documents

Rev #10 rev 14 slides 031812

XP-720 REV-H 061416 - Elenco Electronics€¦ · Figure 1 shows a simplified circuit diagram of the ... The theory of the negative voltage regulator is the same as the ... VR1 LM-317

(NACE Rev 2 and correspondences with NACE rev 1 1 and ISIC ) · NACE Rev. 2 Structure and correspondences with NACE Rev 1.1 and ISIC Rev. 4 NACE Rev. 2 NACE Rev. 1.1 ISIC Rev. 4 01.64

REV. NO : A REV. DATE

Gifts of the Holy Spirit – 061416… · What is the purpose of the Holy Spirit in the life of a believer? Purpose(s) of the Holy Spirit üEmpower the believer for works and witness

Act Rev Francesa,Rev Liberales

PARISH STAFF REV ROBERT CLARK REV EDGAR RODRIGUEZ REV

Rev #1 rev 5 slides 010812

Rev #7 rev 11 slides 022612

PASTOR: Rev. Scott Carpentier : Rev. Clifford Cabral : Rev ...PASTOR: Rev. Scott Carpentier PASTOR EMERITUS: Rev. Clifford Cabral PASTOR EMERITUS: Rev. Bernard O’Reilly ST. JOSEPH

Rev. Dr. Robert H. Mills - marconf.ca · Rev. Dr. Robert H. Mills. Rev. Dr. Robert H. Mills. Rev. Dr. Robert H. Mills. Rev. Norman Marple - Ordination. Rev. Norman Marple – Candidate

PCN #07 0024 Rev. E Parts List - Analog Devices€¦ · a PCN #07_0024 Rev. E Parts List Rev: D Rev: original Rev: original Rev: original Rev: original Rev: D Rev: D Rev: D Rev: D

J Gold Deck for Estee-061416

3/rev) to 102cm3/rev (6.2 in3/rev) - PRODRIVE PTO AND

Rev #4 rev 8 slides 020512

DATA PROTECTION POLICY - Amazon S3€¦ · Web viewPolicy 49 Data Protection Policy 49 Data Protection Policy 49 Data Protection Issued Rev 1 Rev 2 Rev 3 Rev 4 Rev 5 Rev 6 Rev 7 Rev

Rev your rev engine

TRAINING PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - Hanford Site6/2013 TPD-0017 INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF TRAINING Rev 13 Page 2 of 16 Revision Status Rev No. RevO Rev 1-4 Rev 5 Rev6 Rev 7 Rev 8 Rev9 Rev 10

Rev 1.4 Approved.pdf · Rev ust 25, 2008 Rev 5/ Au ustl 1991 Rev 71/ July 14, 2008 Rev 201 February 2, 2009 Rev 221 October 10, 2008 Rev 10/ October 1, 1973 Rev O/ Undated Rev O

Incentive Divergence Rev Rev