Dynamic simulation of electromagnets · 2009. 1. 29. · Division Chassis & Safety Electronic...

Preview:

Citation preview

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

1 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Dynamic Simulation of Electromagnets

European COMSOL Conference

5 November 2008

Presented at the COMSOL Conference 2008 Hannover

2 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Contents

1. Electronic brake systems by Continental Automotive Systems

ABS

ESC

2. COMSOL for electromagnetic actuators

Magnetic force

Armature movement by mesh deformation

Fast calculation of system dynamics

3. Conclusion

3 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Contents

1. Electronic brake systems by Continental Automotive Systems

ABS

ESC

2. COMSOL for electromagnetic actuators

Magnetic force

Armature movement by mesh deformation

Fast calculation of system dynamics

3. Conclusion

10 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Anti-lock brake system (ABS)

control slip between wheel and road

“stick friction > slip friction”

maximize force between wheel and road

maintain lateral guiding force

vehicle remains stable

vehicle can be steered

shorter stopping distance in most situations

targets:

11 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

ABS components

12 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

ABS hydraulic layout

brake pedal,booster,master cylinder

wheel brake

outlet valve

inlet valve

13 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

ABS active control

inlet valve closed outlet valve open

constant pressure phase pressure decrease phase

14 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

with ABS

Antilock Brake System ABS – µ-Split Braking

15 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

without ABS

Antilock Brake System ABS – µ-Split Braking

18 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Electronic Stability Control ESC – Active Yaw Control

19 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Electronic Stability Control ESC

ABS: Anti-lock Brake System+ EBD: Electronic Brake force Distribution+ TCS: Traction Control System+ AYC: Active Yaw Control

= ESC: Electronic Stability Control

20 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Contents

1. Electronic brake systems by Continental Automotive Systems

ABS

ESC

2. COMSOL for electromagnetic actuators

Magnetic force

Armature movement by mesh deformation

Fast calculation of system dynamics

3. Conclusion

21 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Electronic Stability Control ESC – Exploded View

MK60 ESC

22 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Electromagnetic inlet valve

23 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Magnetization of steel

densityflux magnetic1

field magnetic0

BHr

rr

µµ=

COMSOL > Physics > Equation System > Subdomain Settings

normB_qa = sqrt( eps + abs(Br_qa)^2 + abs(Bz_qa)^2 )

COMSOL > Physics > Subdomain Settings

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

magnetic field [kA/m]

flu

x d

ensity [

T]

24 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Materials, mesh, solution

saturation !

force : 23.1 N

25 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Contents

1. Electronic brake systems by Continental Automotive Systems

ABS

ESC

2. COMSOL for electromagnetic actuators

Magnetic force

Armature movement by mesh deformation

Fast calculation of system dynamics

3. Conclusion

26 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Geometry and deformation domain

simplified geometry armature with deformation domain armature with rigid hull

win

din

g

arm

atu

re

core

yoke

27 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Idea of ALE (“arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian”) mesh deformation

physical equation for u(r, z)

→ partial diff´l equation (PDE) for U(R,Z):

R

Z

r

R

Z

z

reference coordinates space coordinates

),(

),(

ZRzz

ZRrr

=

=

(r, z)

U u

),(),(def

zruZRU =

R

z

z

u

R

r

r

u

R

U

∂+

∂=

Z

z

z

u

Z

r

r

u

Z

U

∂+

∂=

chain rule

R

z

Z

r

Z

z

R

r

∂−

∂=∆with

∂−

∆=

R

z

Z

U

Z

z

R

U

r

u 1

∂+

∂−

∆=

R

r

Z

U

Z

r

R

U

z

u 1

solve system of equations

insert into PDE for u

28 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Determine the functions r(R, Z) and z(R, Z)

1. prescribed

a) physical deformation (e.g. structural mechanics)

b) explicit formula

2. from boundary conditions

a) Laplace smoothing:

b) Winslow smoothing:

02

2

2

2

=∂

∂+

Z

z

R

r

02

2

2

2

=∂

∂+

z

Z

r

R

recommended here

(purely axial motion of rigid parts)

29 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Explicit deformation z(Z)

-0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25-0.25

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

1.25

Z

z

?

30 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Continuous / differentiable deformations z(Z)

-0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25-0.25

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

1.25

Z

z

31 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

-0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25-0.25

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

1.25

Z

z

Continuous / differentiable deformations z(Z)

32 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

-0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25-0.25

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

1.25

Z

z

Continuous / differentiable deformations z(Z)

33 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Continuous / differentiable deformations z(Z)

-0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25-0.25

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

1.25

Z

z

34 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Continuous / differentiable deformations z(Z)

-0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25-0.25

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

1.25

Z

z

35 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Continuous / differentiable deformations z(Z)

-0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25-0.25

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

1.25

Z

z

36 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Continuous / differentiable deformations z(Z)

-0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25-0.25

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

1.25

Z

z

37 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Continuous / differentiable deformations z(Z)

-0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25-0.25

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

1.25

Z

z

38 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Continuous / differentiable deformations z(Z)

-0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25-0.25

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

1.25

Z

z

39 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Continuous / differentiable deformations z(Z)

-0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25-0.25

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

1.25

Z

z

40 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Continuous / differentiable deformations z(Z)

-0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25-0.25

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

1.25

Z

z

41 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Continuous / differentiable deformations z(Z)

-0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25-0.25

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

1.25

Z

z

recommended here:

linear deformation

42 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Geometry and deformation domain

simplified geometry armature with deformation domain armature with rigid hull

win

din

g

arm

atu

re

core

yoke

43 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Voltage step response – mesh deformation and magnetic field

44 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Voltage step response – eddy currents

45 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Voltage step response – armature motion

0 5 10 150

0.5

1

1.5

2

solenoid current [A]

with eddy currents

without eddy currents

0 5 10 150

10

20

30

40

50

magnetic force [N]

0 5 10 150

0.5

1

1.5

eddy current power [W]

time [ms]

armature

core

yoke

total

46 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Voltage step response – armature motion

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

gap [mm]

with eddy currents

without eddy currents

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

velocity [m / s]

time [ms]

47 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Comparison to experiment

Inlet valve - force versus gap for 250 ampere turns

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

gap [mm]

forc

e [

N]

COMSOL

test bench

48 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Contents

1. Electronic brake systems by Continental Automotive Systems

ABS

ESC

2. COMSOL for electromagnetic actuators

Magnetic force

Armature movement by mesh deformation

Fast calculation of system dynamics

3. Conclusion

49 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Static dependence of field on solenoid current (up to eddy currents)

coil

extrot

S

eInBevHE z

ϕσσ

rrrrr

=×−+−

Ar

rot=

0 (neglect eddy currents from field change)

t

AE

∂−=

rr

JHrr

=rot

coil

ext

0

rotrot1

rotS

eInAevA

t

Az

r

ϕσ

µµσ

rrrr

r

=×−

+

),,( xvIAA ext

rr=

coil

ext)(

S

eInBevE z

ϕσ

rrrr

+×+=

ext)( JBvErrrr

+×+= σ BHr

rr=µµ0

50 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Dynamics of solenoid current: integral parameter magnetic flux

)(1

indextext UUR

I +=

+= ∫∫

coil

21

coilext

S

dzdrErS

nU

R

Ψ

−= ∫∫

4444 34444 21

r

coil

21

coilext

S

dzdrArS

n

dt

dU

,1

Ψ−=

dt

dU

RI extext )(A

rΨ=Ψ ( )),,( xvIA ext

rΨ=

51 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

System dynamics

,1

Ψ−=

dt

dU

RI extext ),,( xvIextΨ=Ψ

),,( xvII Ψ= extext

),,(extext xvIRUdt

dΨ⋅−=

Ψ

+ armature equation of motion

+ simple effective eddy current model

0 1 2 3 4 50

10

20

30

40

50

60

Iext

[A]

ΨΨ ΨΨ [

mV

s]

4 m/s

2 m/s

0 m/s

-2 m/s

-4 m/s

• COMSOL solves

for

• look-up table / interpolation

prescrext )( Ψ=Ψ I

extI

52 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Effective eddy current model

( ))(eddy ti+)(tψ+solenoid resistance R

effective eddy current resistance Reddy

effective eddy current inductance Leddy

external voltage Uext(t)

( ))()()(' statext tIRtUt Ψ−=Ψ

)(stat ΨI

eddyi

)()(')(' eddyeddyeddyeddy tiRttiL −Ψ=

≈ ms 1

eddy

eddy

R

L

( )ms 02.01 ≈τ)()(')(' 21 ttt ψτψτ −Ψ=

determine Leddy , Reddy , τ1 , τ2 from least squares fit to Comsol result

53 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Generation of small systems of ordinary differential equations

),( yufy =&

y

f(u, y) Integrator

1/su

yy

u

look-up table

parameter fit

reduced linear model

field problem

(e.g. COMSOL)

dynamic system

(e.g. Simulink)

• fast solution

• parameter variation

• integration into comprehensive model

54 / Dr. Harald Biller / printed 21 October 2008 © Continental AG

Division Chassis & SafetyElectronic Brake Systems Simulation

Conclusion – simulation in industrial development

1. efficiency

fewer prototypes

better experiments

2. product performance

more variants

automatic optimization

functional insight

• “observe” new quantities

• isolate parameter influence

3. robust products

create limit configurations

study tolerances statistically