View
216
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Donohue Harney Transcript
1/10
Nick Donohue Interview for The New England Journal of Higher Education
Page | 1
NICK DONOHUE INTERVIEW FOR THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Q: Hello. Im John Harney. Im the Executive Editor ofThe New England Journal of Higher
Education. Im here today with Nick Donohue, whos been President and CEO of the
Nellie Mae Education Foundation since late 2006. This past year, Nick and his colleagues
have been reframing the Foundations strategic focus for the next four years and beyond.
Nick, in a nutshell, what is the Foundations new focus?
A: John, a couple of years ago, the board began to look at our past and current performance,
and they asked themselves some really good questions. What difference were we
making? How much of a difference were we making? And for whom were we making
that kind of difference? And they asked us to look into that question and really reflect onwhere we had been in the past six or seven years as a foundation. We took a look, and we
discovered some interesting things. We looked at the context in the world around us,
and we realized that issues of global competition had really changed things for schooling.
Where in the past it was OK to have a subset of learners really achieve and excel and
move on to, really, the gold standard, which is postsecondary success, that if in our
society, were serious about remaining competitive, we needed a lot more learners
achieving those levels of skills and knowledge: that those were the new currency for
success.
We looked around at issues of not just more learners learning, but more learners learning
more; that the way we had in our education systems established the outcomes, the
standards, if you will, for performance, they really were focused on the basics, somewhat
due to federal policies, somewhat due to the natural evolution of schooling. But that it
was the combination of those two challenges more learners needing to succeed and
more learners needing to succeed at higher and more complex levels that really led us to
rethink our approach.
7/31/2019 Donohue Harney Transcript
2/10
Nick Donohue Interview for The New England Journal of Higher Education
Page | 2
So when we started to think, well, what would you do to accommodate achievement in
that kind of context? What would it look like? Is it really enough to continue to support
the improvement in school as we know it? We came to a different conclusion. Through a
rigorous process, we looked at the data, the information, and we came to the conclusion
that it really wasnt about [simply] making the classroom structure that we know today
better and working better.
The notion we came up with was student-centered learning opportunities opportunities
that put learners really at the center of the design, where we explore different ways of
engaging students, different places where students learn, different agents of learning,
different people they connect with to help them achieve skills and knowledge where
we really make the learning the constant, and make time and agency and location the
variable. Because right now in school; time, location, and agency are the constants and
learnings the variable. And wed like to turn that around.
We think this is a solution, in part, to issues around equity. There are lots of reasons why
we have differential levels of achievement. But the outcome levels are so low, especially
for those who are low-income, low-income of color, underserved populations in our
communities across the region, that we think one of the root causes is the actual design
of the learning environment. And the way that people of all different kinds need to adapt
to a system that is really based on one principle, which is one size fits all.
And that doesnt make any sense in todays world, especially if you incorporate the
notion that technology has just turned on its head the notion of information flow.
Classroom structures of the past were designed so that a teacher in front of the class
could convey and parcel out information through textbooks and lecture, and some
experience. And now, of course, the information is a fire hydrant, gushing out all over us.The question is, how do you organize schooling and learning opportunities to take
advantage of that flow of information, take advantage of the differences learners bring,
to build on their needs and their interests, and to really get more creative and bring our
schooling system up into the 21st
century?
So student-centered learning is what we call it. Its about calling into question the
variables, as I said, of when learning happens, where learning happens, who are the
agents, if you will. We think theres room to expand those notions. Everyone has a
variety of adults who are important, who help them learn. Well, lets make that part of
how we organize for school. Lets integrate technology in real ways, and lets be carefulabout how we assess learning and how we hold ourselves accountable, make sure we
keep our eyes on the right things.
7/31/2019 Donohue Harney Transcript
3/10
Nick Donohue Interview for The New England Journal of Higher Education
Page | 3
Q: Can you offer an example of how a student-centered learning model would bring in other
agents?
A: A lot of communities have internship [and] community-service learning activities, and
these are rich, powerful experiences. In fact, when you ask people to describe thepowerful learning experiences they have had in their lives, and you allow them to
consider school opportunities and other opportunities, they will frequently talk about the
out-of-school, if you will, or unofficial relationships they had that led to learning. So
internships, community-service opportunities, life experience -were very interested in
understanding better how to assess the learning people get in a wide variety of arenas.
So these processes internships and service-learning opportunities are rich. Not
enough of them are actually for credit. People are learning skills and knowledge in these
arenas that they should get credit for.
Q: And youve referred to how the internships can be tied back to the academics. Is there a
specific role for that in the student-centered model?
A: I think its essential to varying degrees. We have some actual experience organizing
events, where there are learners who were on the brink of dropping out, and they
needed one more civics course or credit to get their high school graduation. And they
participated in really complex and interesting analyses of community-based issues related
to public water supply, voting rights, a myriad of things that are real-world opportunities.
And they produced documents, they gave presentations, they studied, they researched,
they analyzed, they did all the things that our schools purport to be about. And those
experiences and skills and knowledge were vetted by professional teachers. And those
learners get credit for those opportunities. That kind of situation, more and more, oughtto be available to people.
Lots of issues [are] related to itquality control, making sure theyre rigorous; making
sure its not just the easy secondary route, where people kind of recover some credit in a
less rigorous way. But we think it really jibes with where we are in the world, because we
want our young people to function in a high-functioning way in real-world settings, and
our employers and our community leaders tell us we definitely need more of that.
Q: Does the teaching establishment seem receptive to these kinds of ideas that in a sense
are turning the old ideas of schooling on their head?
A: Absolutely. I think that its a breath of fresh air for, I think, most teachers. Teachers
enter teaching because they want to engage young people, help them learn, and have a
fulfilling experience for themselves while they do it. There are many who tell us theyre
really eager to exercise this option, because it liberates, if you will, the expertise and the
aspirations they brought. They want to do some interesting things. And there will
7/31/2019 Donohue Harney Transcript
4/10
Nick Donohue Interview for The New England Journal of Higher Education
Page | 4
always be a place for classroom lecture and engagement, and some very traditional
methods. Were not saying abandon those completely.
Q: What about time and location?
A: When it comes to time and location, weve really learned a lot in the past couple of years.Our work around after-school and out-of-school time, our work in adult learning, our
work in a whole range of areas has been about trying to organize high-quality academic
experiences for learners when theyre not in school. Its a very simple notion: that school
is a place where people learn, and should learn; and they learn and engage and grow
outside of school and outside of the school hours as well. So anyone whos been on a
sports team, or had a job or studies on their own, knows what its like to accrue
information and knowledge. Everybody has a story of the young person whos doing
pretty well in school, but who excels in this curricular activity around art or technology, or
something theyre self-motivated about.
And so while staying inside of the box of making sure that we focus on the skills and
knowledge people need to succeed because we do support a standards-based approach
to this that there are things people really need to learn that the places and times that
they can learn these things just vary. It does not all happen between 8:00 and 2:00 or
9:00 and 3:00, or some schools, 7:30 and 1:00. I mean, learning does not stop when the
bell rings and the kids walk out on the street. There are lots of opportunities. We want
to help people make those part of what counts for learning in a high-quality, rigorous
way.
Q: Is there an issue in terms of the out-of-school opportunities being as inequitable as school
has been for some groups of kids? If youre relying on visits to museums and things likethat in out-of-school time, doesnt that vary with family income and preparation, that sort
of thing?
A: Absolutely. And thats part of why normalizing these kinds of opportunities as part of our
normal educational opportunities, our public educational opportunities, is so important.
More well-to-do people have better opportunities to learn. We dont capture that
learning. But they have the opportunities. You can never do this just based on peoples
natural, available opportunities that they have as families. That would not address the
issues of equity, which are at the core of our purpose. Were about providing greater
equity of opportunity. So those opportunities were suggesting ought to be lined up withthings that work for the higher achievers.
So for example, we know that low-income children lose more learning in the summer,
and that higher-income children actually sustain and gain learning in the summer. Well,
we know why that is: the richer activities, more time with adults, all the things that you
might think would lead to higher achievement. How do you make those part of a school
experience?
7/31/2019 Donohue Harney Transcript
5/10
Nick Donohue Interview for The New England Journal of Higher Education
Page | 5
So one of the implications for student-centered learning is not just using time differently,
but thinking about the school year differently. We dont think that, to have an equitable
system of any kind, you can continue to have a gap thats two or three months long
where youre risking the learning that happened in the last part of the last school year,
and youre taking up the beginning of the next school year. Basing our school calendar onan agrarian calendar, which is at its roots we wonder if the time has come to reconsider
that.
Q: In terms of assessments, how do you measure whether it would be more equitable with
these programs if thats part of the student-centered model?
A: Well, we support really rigorous assessment and accountability. We think, especially for
reasons of equity and just basic quality, that you need to stay on top of whether youre
delivering the goods for learners. So we want to be clear about that. Assessment and
accountability are important features of the system we envision, and the one we talk
about and want to support. No Child Left Behind [had]lots of issues with it, one thing it
did is it shined a light on the differential outcomes. There will always be differences in
learning. Not everybody has to have the exact same outcome. But the notion that you
can equalize that is very critical to us. We think holding education, ourselves, and all the
players in education accountable is critical.
So to do that, you have to assess student results. Have to gather information about
whether learners are learning what you want them to learn. Now, testing has gotten a
bad name lately, because what we mean by testing now is a very rigid, very narrow
experience that tests in very narrow ways some basic skills. Its not robust enough,its
not varied enough, and it doesnt gather enough different kinds of evidence aboutstudent learning.
You want to know if somebody can add, you can give them a set of math problems. You
want to know if they can write, you can give them something to write. You want to know
if they can think or problem-solve, youve got to give them a problem to solve. So we
believe that assessments need to involve more evidence, more performance, if you will,
more demonstrationopportunities for students to show in varied ways what they can
do. You want someone to be good at teamwork, put them in a setting where they got to
work with other people and see how well they do. You want to assess whether people
can present themselves publicly, then give them a chance to present themselves publicly.
And there are a myriad of ways that have been worked on for years of being able to
measure these kinds of things in thoughtful, rigorous ways that are both reliable and
valid, which are two assessment terms. Reliable means you have to get the same
estimation of performance no matter who is doing the judgment, and valid means that
the assessment opportunity actually measures what you want to know about. And there
are ways to do those more creative assessment processes as part of a varied system. So
7/31/2019 Donohue Harney Transcript
6/10
7/31/2019 Donohue Harney Transcript
7/10
Nick Donohue Interview for The New England Journal of Higher Education
Page | 7
Q: And at lower levels, theres the example of the Boston Arts Academy that has the artists
come in, basically, and watch performances and productions.
A: Yeah. Boston Day and Evening has a competency-based piece in Boston. (So does) Parker
Academy in Worcester. There are schools in every state in the region that are
experimenting with this approach, and doing well with it.
Q: Stepping back a little bit, youve spoken about standards a few times. What are some of
the things that we think students do have to know to succeed, whether in work or higher
education?
A: It starts with some very basic, familiar things. Literacy: you need to be able to read and
write. Numeracy: youve got to be able to work numbers in todays society. Knowing
something about history, we do learn from the past, and weve taken it for granted lately.
Some social science is critical. Understanding the scientific process is a critical dimension
of what we need to do. Understanding some of what people would call higher-end
cognitive skills around analysis, creative thinking, problem-solving these kinds of things
that employers have been clamoring for, for the past decade, [as they] have seen the
coming of a global economy. And they know, to be competitive, we need people who can
think, work on teams, solve the problem that they dont know about today, communicate
well with their colleagues and others, who have a sense of purpose, who have a
connection to the civic life,another area we think is critical. But rooted, again, in a
really incredibly strong and important deep grasp of some of what people would call basic
skills, because those are still critically important.
Q: And you made the point in the piece that you recently wrote for The New England Journal
of Higher Education about the fact that higher education does encourage this student-centered learning in a lot of instances. So why is there that chasm between K-12 and
higher education in terms of personalizing the experience?
A: One of the ways we look at it is that higher education has had a primary spot in our
culture in terms of currency and quality. So were proud in this country of having a high-
end higher education system. And, admittedly, it was really an opportunity that only a
few got to take full advantage of, because of access in terms of money, resources,
selectivity. Theres still a premium put on being elite and selective. Were coming around
in higher ed. to understand that we need more opportunity. Community colleges day
has come in terms of being seen as really a viable opportunity, where quality and rigorand practicality can be addressed.
On the K-12 side, we have had a right emphasis on equity and universal access and
engagement. And weits kind of like the train tracks between France and Spain you
used to have the place where youd have to get off, and thered be one gauge on one side
and one gauge on the other. And we worked ourselves into that situation. Had some
different priorities at the lower end, different priorities at the upper end, and now were
7/31/2019 Donohue Harney Transcript
8/10
Nick Donohue Interview for The New England Journal of Higher Education
Page | 8
trying to reconcile things. Our focus is, what do we do about it? And we think the
opportunity is really working both ends of that divide. Our focus for the future is going to
be much more on the sort of middle school/high school end of things. We hope, over
timeand wed like to support a sort of a secondary agenda to help our higher ed
friends think about, how do you take what youve learned about personalizing or student-
centered approaches in higher ed, and how do you help inform whats going on at the K-12 end of things?
So that will have implications for admission processes, itll mean rethinking the
ACCUPLACER in terms of the only way to measure whether a students ready, because
that reinforces the basic skills piece. And itll be, I think, a really interesting and rich
conversation, because higher ed really is leading the conversation recently, around
innovative designs, partly because its a more market-based industry, and theyve got to
respond, because people are coming around saying, We need this, I want this. And
theyre responding, and K-12 ought to be able to do the same.
Q: And if higher ed could help K-12 with that, theyd be helping themselves in terms of their
enrollment being stronger or their pools being stronger, I would think.
A: We think so.
Q: How does the new vision balance school needs with district needs with state needs with
federal needs, such as No Child Left Behind, and do they reinforce each other?
A: Absolutely. They do reinforce each other. And we think that its critical to work on a
number of those levels in concert at the same time. Thats why we have an integrated
approach to our work.
And thats why were involved in national discussions to help sort of shape and support
an evolution of assessment and policies at the federal level, because they really do define
what the states do, and in a trickle-down way, what the districts do and what the local
folks do. Theres nobody in our country now who doesnt know the enormous test
pressure and the narrow test pressure that our classroom teachers are under. Its evident
to almost everybody, including our learners. And we have an opportunity to rebalance
that in a way that affects local practice, district practice, state, and federal practice. So
they are connected in that way, and thats one example of how were trying to work on a
number of different fronts to address that connected issue.
Q: The Foundations organizational approaches of practice, policy, and public understanding
seem to have evolved and been emphasized with this new focus. Can you speak to that?
A: Weve long been invested in trying to develop programs, or models, if you will, of
practice, about how you work with young people in different settings, as I said, adult
learning, after school, higher ed. Model development and knowing how to do the thing
7/31/2019 Donohue Harney Transcript
9/10
Nick Donohue Interview for The New England Journal of Higher Education
Page | 9
youre talking about is critical. Its easy to talk about. Youve got to demonstrate it, show
it, and make it better. So were into model development, or supporting good practices.
If you want to change the system more significantly, and not make these programs just
add-ons or alternatives for those who the systems failed, then youve got to start talking
about policy, got to start talking about the rules that define schooling. So some of thethings we talked about before the Carnegie units for graduation, time requirements for
school, these things that really build the box that school is today you need to
reconsider those, or youll end up only having these innovations occur in spaces where
they can get away with it. And thats not what were about. Were about helping the
system really think about a different way forward as a core facet of what is done, not as
an alternative.
The problem is that good ideas done well dont always push a system forward. So for
other reasons around systems, dynamics, change, and sociology, whatever the
explanation is, big historical systems are hard to change. Higher ed. has gone through
this, K-12, healthcare, transportationthese big systems are hard to change. Theyre
well-entrenched.
So in order to move and make the best out of the models or practices, and to really push
the policies forward, we think that its necessary to promote public demand. So part of
our work will be to rebalance the conversation and support young people, parents,
teachers, community members, and people inside the educational establishment and
institutions to promote change, but with a real emphasis on trying to grow an expectation
that there might be a better way to do things that we dont have to just improve the
situation were in, maybe we can change the situation.
Q: You say you want to grow student-centered experiences into a core facet of education,
rather than simply an alternative or an add-on. You also say you want to improve
outcomes for underserved students, which would be in keeping with the Foundations
history. Can both be accommodated together?
A: We think that one is really a means to the other. We think that, if you really are serious
about meeting the needs of underserved learners, then its time to start thinking about
student-centered approaches to learning as at least a significant core feature. We say it
that way because these kinds of approaches are marginalized. Theyre used after failure.
Theyre used successfully after failure. There are dozens of programs that have startlingresults with dropouts and kids who the system has failed. Why not use the intelligence,
experience, and knowledge that these programs have gained in terms of how to beat the
odds, and make it a preemptive opportunity before failure? It can be done cost-
effectively, it can be done rigorously, and we treat it like an alternative, rather than what
it ought to be, which is a core facet of schooling and how its defined.
7/31/2019 Donohue Harney Transcript
10/10
Nick Donohue Interview for The New England Journal of Higher Education
Page | 10
Q: What youre promoting sounds so logical and natural in some ways. So why have these
solutions not taken hold at this point? And why do you think the Foundation can be the
one organization to serve as the catalyst for this type of change?
A: Habits are hard to change. Traditional approaches are hard to change. We do a lot of
things in ways that we could do better. In this case, education is so important at this timein our societys history that weve got to do something better. And we know what to do.
So we think theres a new opportunity to push through the status quo and really
antiquated approaches to organizing a really critical experience, which is education.
We dont think we can do this alone. Our analysis of the context, our analysis of the field,
our look back at ed reform have all told us that partnership and joint purpose are critical.
Weve found people around the country and around the region who are enlisted in this
kind of effort, who are already working on the same thing. Were discovering that
emerging field of student-centered education, because it is an emerging field. Even with
that, we know that the limits of that partnership are dependent on a lot of things that
happen outside of our control. So were counting on the currents, socially, of increased
attention to equity persisting, the pressure of a changing economy demanding higher
skills, the continued explosion of technology promoting more personal engagements with
information, because thats on such a steep curve, its just unimaginable. Its about direct
and clear and focused partnerships. Its about being part of a bigger community of
people working on the same thing. And its about a hope that some other things fall in
place along the way and continue.
And were going to do the best we can, because our mission is about supporting the
futures of the learners in our region, and making sure that everyone has an opportunity
to succeed, and a really fair opportunity to succeed.
Q: Thank you for your time, Nick, and good luck with the initiative.
M: Copyright 2010, Nellie Mae Education Foundation.
END OF FILE
Recommended