View
218
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
1/21
Enhancing Democratic Accountabilityand Parliamentary Oversight of theInternational Financial Institutions
James V. Riker, Ph.D.New Rules for Global Finance Coalition
Washington, DC, USA
Presentation to the Policy Round Table on
Financially Unaccountable International Financial Institutions,
INFID, Jakarta, Indonesia, 13 June 2006
1
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
2/21
The IMF and World Bank:
What is there to smile about? Singapore Prepares Four Million Smiles
Welcome for IMF, The Strait Times, 12 June2006, page 1.
Singapores Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loongcalled on all four million citizens to greetdelegates of the upcoming IMF and World Bank
Annual Meeting in September 2006 with fourmillion smiles by submitting their photos at theFour Million Smiles campaign web site at:
www.smilesS2006.com2
http://www.smiless2006.com/http://www.smiless2006.com/8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
3/21
The IMF and World Bank:What is there to smile about?
Major Accountability Issues Remain:
Presently, there is no democratically
accountable and open selection process forthe leadership of the World Bank or the IMF.Should future leaders be chosen in a openand transparent process based on merit
rather than on nationality? What progress has been made to increasethe base votes and voice of the leastdeveloped countries in the IMF?Will European countries continue to hold 8to 10 of the 24 IMF board chairs, or will newdemocratic principles for representationguide political formulas for reforming IMFgovernance?
3
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
4/21
Overview
4
1. Setting the Context: The Fundamental Issue for
Developing Countries Is IFI AccountabilityThis means going beyond financial accountabilityto understand the democratic, ecological, political,
and social accountability of the internationalfinancial institutions (IFIs) as well.
2. What Are the Possibilities for Enhancing the
Democratic Accountability of the IFIs? The International Parliamentary Petition (IPP)
initiative
The Democratic Governance and ParliamentaryOversight (DGPO) Project
3. A Shared Agenda for Advocacy focused on theSingapore 2006 Annual Meetings and beyond.
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
5/21
Setting the Context: The Need for Enhancing theDemocratic Accountability of the IFIs (1)
A growing consensus is emerging that the internationalfinancial institutions (IFIs) face fundamental democraticlegitimacy crises due to the multi-dimensional issues of
accountability, transparency, representation, decision-making, and effectiveness.
The recent undemocratic leadership selection processes for the heads
of both the IMF and World Bank have put into question the democraticlegitimacy of these institutions (Kapur & Naim 2005). In terms of representation, the United Nations issued a report in early
2005 publicly criticizing the International Monetary Fund (IMF) andWorld Bank for failing to keep promises to increase the voice of
developing countries in those institutions, issuing an appeal forfundamental reform to address these governance issues.
In the aftermath of the Asian and Argentine financial crises, civil societyorganizations and parliaments in both the North and South have pressedfor more transparent and accountable processes and practices at theIMF and the World Bank.
5
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
6/21
Setting the Context: The Need for Enhancing theDemocratic Accountability of the IFIs (2)
Over the past 60 years, the IMF and World Bank have exertedincreasing control over developing countries in their decision-making about national economic policies and the terms of
international development finance.
Shift in Decision-Making Away from Developing Countries: A keydemocratic deficit has emerged where the locus of decision-makingover national economic policy has been transferred from nationalrepresentatives into the hands of less representative internationalbureaucrats (Sikkink 2002: 310-311).
Parliament Bypassed: A countrys Executive Director is often required
to report only to the Ministry of Finance, thus circumventingdemocratic accountability to elected members of parliament.
6
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
7/21
Setting the Context: The Need for Enhancing theDemocratic Accountability of the IFIs (3)
No Official Commitment to Parliamentary Processes: Despite theIMFs and World Banks professed adherence to the principles ofgood governance, decision-making over key economic policychoices and binding loan agreements is too often made without theformal participation, review, public debate, or ratification of nationalparliaments.
Local Ownership Requires Parliamentary Engagement: If borrowergovernments are expected to exhibit local ownership of thesepolicies and to embrace democratic processes in pursuit of theirnational economic development, parliamentarians need to be fullyengaged in these processes, if they are to be viewed as legitimate,
especially in terms of exercising their voice in the review, consent ordissent of the economic policy prescriptions and the binding loanagreements of the IMF and World Bank.
7
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
8/21
What Are the Possibilities for Enhancing theDemocratic Accountability of the IFIs?
First, there is a critical need to understand
the possibilities for systemic reforms and todevelop effective strategies for enhancingthe democratic accountability of theinternational financial institutions.
Second, a collaborative approach involving
civil society organizations, members ofparliament, and parliamentary networks, anddeveloping country governments is required
to hold the IFIs accountable.8
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
9/21
International Parliamentary Petition (IPP)
One positive step to address this situation is a petition initiativeto guarantee the right for effective parliamentary oversight ofnational economic policy-making by borrower countries in theirrelations with the international financial institutions.
To date, the International Parliamentary Petition (IPP) has receivedthe support of over 1,400 members of parliament worldwide, over400 members of whom are from the developing world and representover 50 countries. A group of parliamentarians formally presented
this petition to IMF and World Bank officials at the spring 2005meetings.
While the IPP initiative represents an important vehicle for facilitatingparliamentary attention on the IFIs, a longer-term multi-dimensionalstrategy is needed to enhance the accountability, transparency,representation and decision-making of these institutions, and tocoordinate efforts and support capacity-building for effectiveparliamentary oversight of the international financial institutions atthe national, regional, and global levels.
9
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
10/21
International Parliamentary Petition (IPP)
Proposes specific democratic reforms:
that the democratically elected representativesof recipient nations are the final arbiters of alleconomic policies in their countries [and] thatnational parliaments in recipient nations have
the right and obligation to be fully involved in thedevelopment and scrutiny of all measuresassociated with BWI activities within theirborders, and hold the final power of ratification.
Source: International Parliamentarians Petition for Democratic Oversight ofIMF and World Bank Policies, web site at: www.ipp-info.net.
10
http://www.ipp-info.net/http://www.ipp-info.net/http://www.ipp-info.net/8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
11/21
Democratic Governance & ParliamentaryOversight (DGPO) Project
Overall Project Research Agenda:
What are the guiding principles for effectivedemocratic governance of the IFIs?(i.e., standards for transparency, accountability
mechanisms, basis for representation, legitimatedecision-making processes).
What role can civil society play in developingand/or strengthening appropriate accountabilitymechanismsat the national, regional, and globallevels for enhancing democratic governance and
parliamentary oversight of the IFIs?11
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
12/21
ENHANCING DEMOCRATIC ACCOUNTABILITY &PARLIAMENTARY OVERSIGHT OF THE IFIs
12
LEVEL OFACTION
ENHANCE ACCOUNTABILITYOF THE IFIs
TARGETS OFADVOCACY
NATIONAL Strengthen Civil Society Capacity on IFIAccountability Issues
Provide Outreach to Parliament to StrengthenOversight of the IFIs
Strengthen Government Position in its Relationswith the IFIs
National Parliaments(Brazil, Ghana, India)
Sub-nationalParliaments (India)
REGIONAL Strengthen Regional Civil Society Network on IFIAccountability IssuesProvide Outreach to Regional ParliamentaryNetwork
Target Governments Advocacy toward RegionalDevelopment Banks
Asian DevelopmentBank (ADB)
Inter-AmericanDevelopment Bank (IDB)
Committee ofParliaments of theAmericas (COPA)
GLOBAL Strengthen Global Civil Society Network on IFIAccountability
Provide Outreach to Global ParliamentaryNetworks
Target Governments Advocacy toward the IFIs
IMF
World Bank
Parliamentary Networkon the World Bank(PNoWB)
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
13/21
The Role of Parliamentary Oversight
What oversight roleshould parliamentarians play inensuring effective democratic governance of the IFIs?
The Basis for Representation: What role should members ofparliament play in enhancing the voice and vote of developingcountries in the governance of IFIs?
Legitimate Decision-Making Processes: How should membersof parliament be engaged in the process for review and finalapproval of IFI loans and projects, both those directly affectingtheir respective countries and those that impinge on globalstandards or public goods?
Accountability Mechanisms: What forms of accountability are
appropriate for parliamentarians to hold Executive Directors(EDs) for decisions taken at Board meetings?
Standards for Transparency: How can parliamentarians andthe public acquire relevant information regarding Boarddiscussions and decisions?
13
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
14/21
DGPO Project: Main Research Activities (1)
1. Case Studies of 3-4 Key Countries:Each civil society country partner will share what theyhave learned about what works, what does not, and
what is still needed to expand civil society collaborationwith national parliaments.
The initial civil society country partners include: Rede Brasil in Brazil; ISODEC in Ghana; Intercultural Resources in India; and
INFID in Indonesia (pending approval).
14
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
15/21
DGPO Project: Main Research Activities (1)
Country partners will explore:
(a) How to expand and to enhance outreach totheir own national parliaments?(e.g., literacytraining and materials; budget monitoring); and
(b) How to reinvigorate national civic processesthat enhance parliamentary oversight of theIFIs?This means identifying a range of relevantactivities, such as strategic planning, capacity-
building, public education and training, outreachto parliaments and other key actors (e.g., media,political parties, trade unions, etc.).
15
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
16/21
DGPO Project: Main Research Activities (2)
2. Conduct a Global Inventory of Relevant Initiatives:
Develop a broad catalogue of civil society initiatives to
hold the IFIs accountable and engage with their nationalparliaments on a range of policy issues.
The project will catalogue the civil society groups that
are engaged in some aspect of IFI democracy, includingdeveloping a matrix of key governance objectives andspecific actions planned. This also means conductingan inventory (i.e., both of initiatives and groups) of what
is currently happening to enhance parliamentaryoversight of the IFIs.
16
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
17/21
DGPO Project: Main Research Activities (3)
3. Develop a Data Base of Members of Parliament
and Groups of Parliamentarians: The project iscoordinating the development of a database andforming a network of elected officials and groups ofparliamentarians interested in two levels of action:
National: Increasing oversight and accountabilityfor IFI projects within their respective countries; &
Global: Increasing oversight and accountability forthe actions and decisions of Executive Directors(EDs) representing their countries.
17
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
18/21
DGPO Project: Main Research Activities (4)
18
4. Design and Disseminate Educational andPolicy Tools to Elected Officials:
A range of materials (e.g., primer/handbook,policy briefs, etc.) will be developed for membersof parliament (MPs) to:
a) Enhance economic and political literacy of IFIissues; and
b) Share effective policy strategies, processesand practices for enhancing the democraticaccountability of IFIs and their operations at the
national, regional, and global levels.
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
19/21
A Shared Agenda for Advocacy
1. Enact and implement legislation requiring
that the national parliaments of developingcountries are engaged in the formalparticipation, review, public debate and
ratification process over the economic policyprescriptions and loan agreements of theinternational financial institutions (IFIs) and
regional development banks.(i.e., International Parliamentary Petition)
19
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
20/21
A Shared Agenda for Advocacy
2. Enhance national parliamentariansoversight of the economic priorities,policies and lending practices of theinternational financial institutions (i.e.,
IMF, World Bank) and regionaldevelopment banks.
(e.g., Parliamentary Network on the World Bank
PNoWB; Committee of Parliaments of theAmericas COPA; Inter-American Federation ofParliamentarians - FIPA)
20
8/14/2019 DGPO-INFIDRountable-Enhancing Democratic Accountability & Parliamentary Oversight of the IFIs
21/21
A Shared Agenda for Advocacy3. Reform the IFIs by making them more
accountable to broader publics.
Some strategies include: Opening these institutions to civil societyrepresentatives and parliamentarians;
Ensuring access to essential information; Fostering broader representation of developing
countries and non-state actors; and
Altering the power distribution of these institutionsby strengthening the voting rights of developingcountries.
21
Recommended