View
0
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Ground Floor, Bay Suites
1a Humewood Rd,
Humerail
Port Elizabeth, 6001
P O Box 21842
Port Elizabeth 6000
South Africa
T: +27 (0) 41 509 4800
F: +27 (0) 41 509 4850
E: portelizabeth@srk.co.za
www.srk.co.za
15 June 2015 490362 Paterson Waste Water Treatment Works Hydrogeological Investigation
Partners AH Bracken, MJ Braune, JM Brown, CD Dalgliesh, JR Dixon, DM Duthe, BM Engelsman, R Gardiner,
GC Howell, WC Joughin, DA Kilian, PR Labrum, B Liber, DJ Mahlangu, RRW McNeill, HAC Meintjes, JA Middleton,
MJ Morris, GP Nel, VS Reddy, M Ristic, PE Schmidt, PJ Shepherd, MJ Sim, VM Simposya, AA Smithen,
HFJ Theart, KM Uderstadt, AT van Zyl, DJ Venter, ML Wertz, MD Wanless, A Wood
Directors AJ Barrett, JR Dixon, PR Labrum, V Maharaj, DJ Mahlangu, VS Reddy, PE Schmidt, PJ Shepherd
Associate Partners R Armstrong, N Brien, L Coetser, M Hinsch, AH Kirsten, Dr LH Kirsten, S Kisten, JA Lake,
V Maharaj, SA McDonald, RD O’Brien, T Shepherd, JJ Slabbert, D Visser
Consultants AC Burger, BSC(Hons); JAC Cowan, PrSciNat, BSc(Hons); JH de Beer, PrSci Nat, MSc;
T Hart, MA, TTHD; GA Jones, PrEng, PhD; TR Stacey, PrEng, DSc; OKH Steffen, PrEng, PhD;
PJ Terbrugge, PrSciNat, MSc; DW Warwick, PrSciNat, BSc(Hons)
SRK Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd Reg No 1995.012890.07
African Offices:
Cape Town + 27 (0) 21 659 3060
Durban + 27 (0) 31 279 1200
East London + 27 (0) 43 748 6292
Johannesburg + 27 (0) 11 441 1111
Kimberley + 27 (0) 53 861 5798
Pietermaritzburg + 27 (0) 33 347 5069
Port Elizabeth + 27 (0) 41 509 4800
Pretoria + 27 (0) 12 361 9821
Rustenburg + 27 (0) 14 594 1280
Accra + 23 (3) 24 485 0928
Harare + 263 (4) 49 6182
Lubumbashi + 243 (0) 81 999 9775
Group Offices:
Africa
Asia
Australia
Europe
North America
South America
Element Consulting Engineers PO Box 19429 Tecoma 5214
Attention: Quinten Cloete
Hydrogeological Investigation for the Upgrading of the Waste Water Treatment Works at
Paterson, Eastern Cape
1. Introduction
SRK Consulting South Africa (PTY) Ltd (SRK) was appointed by Element Consulting Engineers (ECE, the
Client) to conduct a hydrogeological investigation at the existing Waste Water Treatment Works (WWTW) of
Paterson in the Eastern Cape.
ECE was appointed by Sundays River Valley Municipality for the required services pertaining to the
upgrading of the Paterson Wastewater Treatment Works (PWWTW). The planned area in which the
upgrade is to take place is referred to as the Site (outlined in red in Figure 1 and Figure 2). The existing
PWWTW oxidation pond system will be upgraded to an oxidation ponds system with a screen, de-grit
system, 2 x anaerobic ponds, 6 x facultative ponds, 1 x maturations pond and an irrigation pump station.
The final effluent will be used for irrigation of an open field. Certain specialist investigations, such as this
groundwater investigation, forms a part of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) process to obtain
authorisation from the Eastern Cape Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and
Tourism (DEDEAT) for the development. A groundwater specialist study is required as a part of the process
to investigate the potential of the development to influence the groundwater.
SRK followed the methodology described below in their hydrogeological investigation (quoted from the SRK
document “Proposal: Specialist Assessments for the Proposed Expansion of the Paterson Wastewater
Treatment Works, Eastern Cape Province”, dated 16 April 2015):
“Conduct a desktop assessment of the geology and hydrogeology within a radius of approximately 1 km
of the site. This will include an assessment of the geological, hydrogeological and topographical maps;
and the National Groundwater Archives (NGA) – a database of the Department of Water and Sanitation
(DWS);
SRK Consulting Page 2
KRUR/NELG 490362_Paterson WWTW Hydrogeological Investigation_Jun2015 Apr 2015
Undertake a hydrocensus of boreholes within a 1 km radius of the site. The hydrocensus will be limited
to identifying existing boreholes within a 1 km radius of the site, and recording any available information
of this borehole, including its position, depth, water level, water pH and conductivity;
Describe the potential impact of the WWTW on the hydrogeological features in general, particularly
during the operational phase; and
Recommend appropriate mitigatory measures, if available, to reduce the impact of the proposed
development upon the groundwater quality of the area.”
2. Results
The findings of the hydrogeological investigation are summarised in the sections below.
2.1 Desktop Study
2.1.1 Geology
According to the 1:250 000 geological map of Port Elizabeth (3324) by the Council for Geoscience, the Site
is underlain by Quaternary aeolian (windblown) sand. The aeolian sand overlies the Nanaga Formation,
which in turn overlies the Alexandria Formation, both of the Algoa Group. Refer to Figure 1 for a map with
the geology of the Site.
The explanation booklet “The Geology of the Port Elizabeth-Uitenhage Area” by F.G le Roux of the Council
for Geoscience (2000) describes the geological formations (in order from the youngest to the oldest) as
follows:
Quaternary aeolian sand occurs in the vicinity of Paterson, where sand, derived from the Nanaga
Formation to the south, has accumulated at the foot of the Suurberg range.
The Nanaga Formation comprises semi-consolidated to well-consolidated calcareous sandstone and
sandy limestones. Surficial calcrete of up to 3 m thick or a red soil commonly caps this formation. The
thickness of the Nanaga Formation is governed by surface relief and is often up to 150 m thick. The
formation forms smooth, rounded hills within undulating ridges, trending subparallel to the present
shoreline.
The Alexandria Formation comprises alternating layers of calcareous sandstone, conglomerate and
coquinite and is about 10 m thick. A conglomerate is often present at the base. The clasts consist
mainly of Cape Supergroup quartzites and sandstones.
No faults, folding or other structures have been mapped for the area.
2.1.2 Hydrogeology
According to booklet “An Explanation of the 1:500 000 General Hydrogeological Map of Port Elizabeth 3324”
by P.S. Meyer of the Department of Water Affairs (1998), the Algoa Group aquifer (including the Nanaga and
Alexandria formations on which the Site is situated) is a unique intergranular aquifer, where water seeps
rapidly through the highly porous material until it comes into contact with the underlying impervious pre-Algoa
Group rocks. From here it moves towards the sea within the conglomerate (where present) or the sandy
material; and often emerges as springs at the coast. Borehole yield analyses revealed that less than 60% of
boreholes yield less than 0.5 L/s, implying that 40% of boreholes yield more than 0.5 L/s. The groundwater
quality is generally potable, with electrical conductivity (EC, a measure of salinity) measuring < 300 mS/m
(the limit for drinking water according to the SANS241:2014 Standard is 170 mS/m). Sodium, calcium and
chloride often exceed the maximum recommended limits.
The booklet does not specifically describe aeolian sands, but describes coastal sands (aeolian sands
situated at the coast) and alluvium. These are essentially the same as aeolian sands, except for method
deposition and location. According to the booklet, yields may vary between 0.1 and 15 L/s. Groundwater
quality is described as generally potable (EC measuring < 300 mS/m), providing that the boreholes do not
extend through the sand and into underlying formations of poorer water quality. Water may exceed the
maximum recommended limits for sodium, total alkalinity and chloride.
SRK Consulting Page 3
KRUR/NELG 490362_Paterson WWTW Hydrogeological Investigation_Jun2015 Jun 2015
Figure 1: General Geology of the Site
2.1.3 National Groundwater Archive (NGA)
The NGA was queried for the Site and a surrounding 1 km radius. Four boreholes are listed within this area
and their available information is given in Table 1 below.
Table 1: NGA Borehole Information
Borehole ID Latitude Longitude Water Level
(m bgl) Discharge Rate (L/s)
Depth (m bgl)
Surface Geology
3325BD00060 -33.44128 25.97676 39.6 0.42 155.5 Aeolian sand
EC/P10/147 -33.43577 25.98469 5.2 N/A N/A Aeolian sand
EC/P10/148 -33.43577 25.98469 N/A N/A N/A Aeolian sand
EC/P10/146 -33.43577 25.98477 4.9 N/A N/A Aeolian sand
N/A: Not Available
SRK Consulting Page 4
KRUR/NELG 490362_Paterson WWTW Hydrogeological Investigation_Jun2015 Jun 2015
Figure 2: NGA and Hydrocensus Boreholes
2.1.4 Site Drainage and Shallow Groundwater Movement
Envisaged drainage directions were drawn on a contour map of the Site and surrounding area (Figure 3) to
indicate the direction in which surface water and shallow groundwater would flow. From the Site, water will
move in an east southeastern direction towards the Boesmans River.
SRK Consulting Page 5
KRUR/NELG 490362_Paterson WWTW Hydrogeological Investigation_Jun2015 Jun 2015
Figure 3: Drainage Directions Around the Site
2.2 Hydrocensus and Site Visit
A hydrocensus was conducted within a radius of approximately 1 km of the Site. Two boreholes were
located within a 1 km radius, and one was located just west of the 1 km radius, at Afgri Animal Feeds. The
borehole located closest to the Site is situated approximately 150 m to the northwest of the northern
boundary of the Site. According to a municipal official, these are the abandoned municipal production
boreholes. The municipality reportedly receives its water from boreholes that are situated approximately
8 km from the town. The municipal official also stated that there are a number of people in the town itself
that uses borehole water for personal use. According to a town resident, who had been involved during the
drilling of a borehole, one would intersect groundwater “anywhere” in the area immediately around the town.
This would be true for the sandy aquifer of the Quaternary aeolian sands of the area. He also reported that
they drilled through sand and clay layers, and that no bedrock was intersected in their borehole up to a depth
SRK Consulting Page 6
KRUR/NELG 490362_Paterson WWTW Hydrogeological Investigation_Jun2015 Jun 2015
of 25 m bgl. The farms to the east of the Site could not be accessed during the hydrocensus, due to the
gates being locked.
Refer to Table 3 and Figure 2 for information on the hydrocensus.
The Site is situated in a catchment area and by looking at the available contour information; surface water
will drain from the west, northwest and southwest towards the Site. Currently the liners of the ponds at the
Site have lifted, most likely due to the flow of water under the liners. The ponds appear to overflow and leak,
forming various wetlands around the Site.
Photographs are given in Table 2 below. No rock outcropping was visible on the Site and surrounding area.
A landfill is situated immediately to the west of the WWTW.
Table 2: Photographs of Boreholes
Afgri Borehole Old Municipal Borehole 1
Old Municipal Borehole 2
Lifting liners in pond
SRK Consulting Page 7
KRUR/NELG 490362_Paterson WWTW Hydrogeological Investigation_Jun2015 Jun 2015
Table 3: Hydrocensus Information
Borehole Other ID Latitude Longitude Depth (m bgl)
Water level (m bgl)
EC (mS/m)
pH Comment
Afgri Borehole
None -33.43600 25.97263 25 N/A 82 7.3
Borehole was in use during visit. Owner reported their pump can deliver ~840 L/h. Water used for boiler, showers etc. Water reported to be high in metals, is purified with reverse osmosis.
Old Municipal Borehole 1
EC/P10/146 or EC/P10147
-33.43578 25.98472 N/A 3.02 N/A N/A Borehole open and abandoned. Depth measuring device detected an obstacle in borehole at ~12 m bgl.
Old Municipal Borehole 2
EC/P10/148 -33.43578 25.98470 N/A N/A N/A N/A Borehole collapsed at ~3 m bgl.
2.3 Shallow Soils
During the Site visit, a number of shallow auger holes were made (up to 1 m bgl) to study the shallow soils
surrounding the Site. The soil mainly consisted of sand, with occasional horizons of clayey sand (refer to
Table 4. Shallow groundwater was intersected in all augered holes from approximately 0.5 m bgl.
Table 4: Soils Encountered
Grey brown sand in the auger
Clayey sand rolled into a sausage shape
2.4 Potential Risks & Mitigation
2.4.1 Potential Risks
Considering the “source - pathway – receptor” concept, the following can be concluded for the planned
development of the WWTW:
Potential sources of contamination / potential impacts:
Irrigation water in the form of treated effluent; and
Spillage or leakage of insufficiently treated / contained effluent.
Pathways:
Soil and groundwater
Receptors:
Groundwater as a natural resource and groundwater users (current and future). The Boesmans
River is situated approximately 5 km down gradient to the east of the Site. Currently there are no
known groundwater users within a 1 km radius of the Site. The two boreholes located to the north of
the Site are not in use.
SRK Consulting Page 8
KRUR/NELG 490362_Paterson WWTW Hydrogeological Investigation_Jun2015 Jun 2015
Risk is considered to be present when a complete link between the source, pathway and receptor is formed.
Potential sources of contamination are expected to occur mostly under upset conditions where the designed
water treatment / containment systems do not function as planned.
The summary version of the document “A Protocol to Manage the Potential of Groundwater Contamination
from on Site Sanitation” (Mar 2003) (referred to as the Groundwater Protocol) by the former Department of
Water Affairs and Forestry (now known as the Department of Water and Sanitation), is used as a guideline
document to evaluate the scenario at the Site. According to the Groundwater Protocol, risk levels are based
on the following three factors:
the vulnerability of the underground water resources (aquifers);
the contamination load from the particular sanitation system; and
the current and/or future water use from the aquifer.
Although the planned ponds do not fall under sanitation, the same risk factors apply.
2.4.2 Assessment of Risks
Vulnerability of the Aquifer
The Site is situated on unconsolidated aeolian sand of unknown thickness. The sands create an unconfined
aquifer1 where water can freely move through the pore spaces between sand grains. The groundwater level
2
within these sands will be equal to the water table within the sandy aquifer, since it is unconfined.
The vulnerability of the aquifer is related to the distance that the contaminant must flow to reach the water
table3; the degree of natural degradation of the pollutants and also how easily it can flow through the soil and
rock layers above the water table (unsaturated zone4). The depth of the water table (and water level)
surrounding the Site is considered to be shallow, since it was measured at 3.02 m bgl in one of the boreholes
(approximately 150 m northwest of the Site). However, immediately under the Site in the wetland area,
groundwater was intersected at approximately 0.5 m bgl in the augered holes. Therefore it seems that
currently the water leaking from the WWTW and the water table under the Site is interconnected. According
to the Groundwater Protocol, an aquifer is classified as having a high vulnerability when the potential
pollution source has to move between 2 and 5 m to get to the water table. The potential pollution sources
(the WWTW and the irrigation water) will be situated anywhere between surface level and approximately 3 m
bgl. The definition of an aquifer with a high vulnerability is that it is vulnerable to many pollutants except
those highly absorbed, filtered and/or readily transformed.
Below the aeolian sand aquifer, is the Algoa Group intergranular aquifer, which is seen as a unique aquifer
where water seeps rapidly through the highly porous material until it comes into contact with the underlying
impervious pre-Algoa Group rocks.
Assessment of Contaminant Load from Pollution Sources; and the Ability of the Soils to Reduce the
Contaminant Load in the Unsaturated Zone
According to the Groundwater Protocol, the aeolian sands and clayey sands encountered at the Site have
the ability to be a good to very good barrier to contaminants (like bacteria and viruses), and the rate of flow
through it can vary from very slow (<10 mm/day) in clays to medium (0.1 – 10 m/day) in fine sands.
However, the unsaturated zone at the Site is currently very narrow to non-existing due to the leaking /
overflowing ponds. Should the problem with overflowing ponds be solved during the upgrade, the water
1 Unconfined aquifer: A groundwater aquifer is said to be unconfined when its upper surface (water table) is open to the atmosphere
through permeable material. As opposed to a confined aquifer, the water table in an unconfined aquifer system has no overlying impervious rock layer to separate it from the atmosphere. 2 Groundwater level: The depth to groundwater, as water measured in a borehole. This is likely not the water table, since there is often
a pressure component for groundwater boreholes which raises the water level above the bottom of the casing. This level may or may not reflect the water table. 3 Water table: The surface below which fissures and pores in the strata are saturated with water.
4 Unsaturated zone: The area extending from the top of the soil to the water table.
SRK Consulting Page 9
KRUR/NELG 490362_Paterson WWTW Hydrogeological Investigation_Jun2015 Jun 2015
level may still be high, since the Site is situated in a drainage / catchment area and it was measured at about
3 m bgl in the nearby borehole. The water level in the unconfined san aquifer will also be influenced by
rainfall, and will be higher during periods of higher rainfall and lower during periods of lower rainfall.
The contamination load from the ponds is expected to be high initially as it enters the anaerobic ponds, but
will reduce as the effluent is treated and moves towards the maturation ponds. Once the final effluent leaves
the maturation ponds to be discharged, it should comply with the Standards mentioned in the National Water
Act (Section 39), irrigation with wastewater.
Current and Future Use of the Aquifer
Currently there are no registered groundwater users within a 1 km radius of the Site. The sandy aquifer is
currently being used by residents and businesses of the town, proving that it is exploitable. The sandy
aquifer as well as the underlying Algoa Group aquifer is seen as a groundwater carrier that could be used for
water supply in the future.
Conceptual Hydrogeological Model
In order to gain a better understanding of the underground setting, a hydrogeological conceptual model was
created (Figure 4:). The water level (which will be equal to the water table in this unconfined sand aquifer) is
shown under normal conditions, where the WWTW is not leaking or overflowing onto the aeolian sand (blue
dashed line). The water level is also shown (green dotted line) as it is currently perceived to be, with the
overflowing WWTW elevating the water table to surface level. It is important to note that the water table will
be higher (closer to the surface) during periods of higher rainfall; and will be lower during periods of drought.
Figure 4: Conceptual Hydrogeological Model
2.4.3 Mitigation of Potential Risks
The aeolian sand aquifer and the underlying Algoa Group aquifer are seen as exploitable aquifers from a
groundwater perspective; and its groundwater is currently being used. However, there are currently no
known or registered groundwater users within a 1 km radius of the WWTW. Water levels are considered
high (shallower than 5 m bgl) and the sand aquifer is unconfined. The aquifer may be further exploited in the
future.
Risk 1 – Pollution from WWTW
Potential pollutants from the ponds include bacteria (e.g. E.coli), nitrogen and ammonia. There should be no
seepage from the ponds into the underlying sands. It is recommended that a lining system must be installed
in order to prevent seepage into the sands.
SRK Consulting Page 10
KRUR/NELG 490362_Paterson WWTW Hydrogeological Investigation_Jun2015 Jun 2015
Risk 2 Elevation of Water Table and Pollution from Irrigated Water
Wastewater is to be treated and reclaimed, and used for irrigation nearby the WTWW. The wastewater must
adhere to the requirements from the DWS and must not impact the natural groundwater quality negatively.
Currently the groundwater is believed to be potable and could be used in the future. The potential impacts on
the groundwater are as follows:
DWS standard for irrigation with wastewater does not take into account that discharge will take place
almost directly into the groundwater, since the water table is high and will become higher with irrigation.
If the irrigated water is not treated to drinking standards, the potential impact thereof on the existing
groundwater quality should be scientifically determined; as well as the effectiveness of attenuation of
bacteria over time and distance.
The water table will be raised where irrigation occurs. The natural groundwater level is therefore
changed.
It is recommended that irrigation should take place in the areas to the south of the Site, which is up-gradient
of the existing water logged soils. In this area the unsaturated zone should be “thicker”; and the movement
of the irrigated water through the unsaturated zone will allow for the attenuation of bacteria.
It is also recommended that the reclaimed effluent should be regularly tested (quarterly, or as specified by
the DWS or Department of Environmental Affairs) before it is irrigated to ensure that it complies with the
standards for irrigation with wastewater as per the National Water Act, Section 39, of up to 2000 m3/day. It is
also recommended that monitoring boreholes should be installed up-gradient and down-gradient of the Site
in order to detect potential pollutants entering the groundwater from the WWTW or irrigation water. The
monitoring boreholes should be drilled in such a way that the section of the aquifer that will most likely be
polluted first is adequately penetrated. This is the aeolian sand aquifer. However, it is recommended that
the Nanaga and Alexandria formations should also be drilled through, if they are intersected within the first
50 m of the borehole. If not, then the boreholes can be stopped at 50 m bgl. Approximate positions for
boreholes for a monitoring network is given in Figure 5 below.
Figure 5: Approximate Positions for Monitoring Boreholes
SRK Consulting Page 11
KRUR/NELG 490362_Paterson WWTW Hydrogeological Investigation_Jun2015 Jun 2015
3. Conclusions and Recommendations
The Site and surrounding area is underlain by Quaternary aeolian sand, which overlies the Nanaga
Formation and the Alexandria Formation of the Algoa Group. The aeolian sand (immediately underlying the
Site, unknown thickness) is an unconfined aquifer where the water table and water level (in boreholes) is
expected to be equal. This type of aquifer can produce varying yields, ranging between 0.1 and 15 L/s and
is generally potable from an aesthetic perspective (taste etc.). The National Groundwater Archive revealed
information on four existing boreholes, of which two could be located during the hydrocensus. These were
found unused and abandoned. Access could not be gained to the farming properties during the
hydrocensus, therefore it is possible that all existing boreholes have not been recorded within a 1 km radius
of the Site. It was established during the hydrocensus that the sandy aeolian aquifer is being exploited by
the town residents and businesses.
The surface water and shallow groundwater drainage from the Site is in an east southeastern direction
towards the Boesmans River, situated approximately 5 km east of the Site. The Site is situated in a
catchment area to where surface water and shallow groundwater will drain from the north, west and south of
the Site.
A number of auger holes were dug, and it revealed the presence of sand and clayey sand. The clayey sand
does not seem to be laterally persistent, and may be linked to the wetlands only.
The water level / water table in the aeolian sand aquifer is high in this area, measured at approximately
3 m bgl in a borehole; and at approximately 0.5 m bgl in augered holes around the Site in the wetland areas.
The water table will vary with recharge, being higher during periods of high rainfall and lower during periods
of drought.
Potential risks are leakages or spillages from the WWTW as well as irrigation with reclaimed effluent.
Because of the high water table, potential pollutants can enter the groundwater relatively easily. Although
sand does have the property to attenuate bacteria and viruses over time and distance, there is insufficient
thickness of the unsaturated zone for the attenuation processes underneath the Site and in the immediate
vicinity. The following mitigation measures are recommended:
It is recommended that a lining system must be installed in order to prevent seepage into the sands.
There should be no seepage from the ponds into the underlying sands.
The quality of irrigated wastewater should comply with the National Water Act’s standards for irrigation
with wastewater and water quality monitoring should occur.
Because of the high water, irrigation with wastewater is not considered ideal. It is recommended that
irrigation should take place in the areas to the south of the Site, which is up-gradient of the existing water
logged soils. In this area the unsaturated zone should be “thicker”; and the movement of the irrigated
water through the unsaturated zone will allow for the attenuation of bacteria. A groundwater monitoring
system could be implemented to reveal the impact on groundwater quality and groundwater table.
It is recommended that monitoring boreholes should be installed up-gradient and down-gradient of the
Site in order to detect potential changes in the groundwater quality and to act accordingly. .
Yours faithfully,
Riona Kruger (Pr. Sci. Nat.) Gert Nel (Pr. Sci. Nat.)
Senior Geologist Principal Hydrogeologist
SRK Consulting
Recommended