Application of multicriteria system MKA-2 for multicriteria choice of the most preferred...

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Application of multicriteria system MKA-2 for multicriteria choice of the most preferred insurance "Motor Third Party Liability (MTPL)" Elica Vandeva and Mariana Vassileva IIT-BAS. M ulticriteria analysis problems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

1

2

Multicriteria analysis problems

Multicriteria analysis problem may be described by a decision matrix A(nxk), which can be defined in two ways, where: Ai denotes an alternative with an index i, i=1,…,n; Kj denotes a criterion with an index j, j=1,…,k..

3

Main groups of multicriteria analysis problems

1) The discrete multicriteria choice problems,

2) The ranking problems,

3) The sorting problems.

4

Methods of multicriteria analysis

1. AHP method (S a a t y) – weighting method.

2. PROMETHEE II method (B r a n s and M a r e s c h a l) – outranking methods.

3. CBIM method (N a r u l a et al.) – interactive method.

5

Operation with multicriteria system MKA-2

The criteria to be evaluated are:1. Cost of MTPL insurance;2. Cost of First installment;3. Cost of Next installments;4. Total cost of Payment5. Bonus in Casco in the same insurance company.

The alternatives are as follows:1. Bulgarian Property;2. Victoria Insurance;3. Bul Ins.

Choose the best of MTPL insurance. Consider a car with engine capacity 1581 cubic centimetres, region of use is Sofia and 30 years of driving.

6

The objective of the task: Choosing the best MTPL insurance.

7

Cost of MTPL insurance – quantitative criterion,Cost ot First installment – quantitative criterion.

Criterion type:

8

Cost of Next installments – arranging criterion.Total cost of Payment – qualitative criterion.

Criterion type:

9

Bonus in Casco – weight criterion.

Criterion type:

10

Methods:

11

Analytic Hierarchy Process

12

Analytic Hierarchy Process

13

Analytic Hierarchy Process

14

Prometee II Method

15

Prometee II Method

16

Classification-Based Interactive Method

17

Classification-Based Interactive Method

18

Classification-Based Interactive Method

19

Classification-Based Interactive Method

20

21

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This work was supported by the European Social Fund and the Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science under the Operation programme “Human Resources Development”, Grant scheme BG051PO001/07/3.3-02 „Support for the Develop ment of PhD Students, Post-doctoral Students, Post-graduate Students and Young Scientists”, Grand# BG051PO001/07/3.3-02/7.

22

Recommended