View
215
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
EUROCONTROL
Annex II - ACC
Annual NetworkOperations Report 2014
EUROCONTROL
Network Managernominated by the European Commission
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 1
1. INTRODUCTION The following annex provides a detailed analysis of ATC capacity evolution in 2014 for ACCs within the ECAC States for which data is available. The source of statistics is the NMOC unless otherwise indicated. The analysis covers:
• Traffic & Delay The chart and data table provide comprehensive information concerning the evolution of traffic and delay from 2010 to 2014 (where data is available). It includes the following values:
• Peak day traffic is the number of flight entries to the ACC on the peak day of each year. • Summer & Yearly Traffic is the daily average number of flight entries during the summer season (May to October inclusive) and
over the whole year (January to December). • Summer & Yearly En-route Delay is the average en-route delay per flight (including weather and special events e.g. industrial
action), attributed to the ACC during the summer season (May to October inclusive) and over the whole year (January to December).
• 2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan • Traffic Evolution gives the percentage difference between the total traffic (number of flight entries) in 2014 compared to 2013,
for the summer and the full year. • En-route Delay gives the number of minutes per flight of en-route delay attributed to all causes and also excluding delays
attributed to weather and special events. Values are provided for the summer and the full year. • ACC Reference value per ACC is the delay breakdown to achieve the European delay target of 0.5 min/flight for the full year, and
0.7 min/flight in the Summer season, as published in the NOP 2014-2018/19. • ACC Capacity Baseline – Offered: • ACCESS or Reverse CASA was used to measure the capacity actually offered by the ACC during the reference periods (2-15 June
2014, 7-20 July 2014). This is calculated from actual delay (Reverse CASA) or from projected delay (ACCESS). Projected delay is obtained by increasing the traffic and creating a regulation scheme for the studied ACC using traffic volume capacities and configuration data (sector opening schemes) provided by ANSPs.
• Capacity Plan (increase for Summer 2014) is the percentage value provided by ANSPs in the Network Operations Plan 2014-2018/19. This figure represents the ANSP commitment to increasing ACC capacity for Summer 2014, when compared to Summer 2013.
• Capacity enhancement: planned enablers • This information was taken from the local capacity plan in the Network Operations Plan 2014-2018/19. An indication is given as to
whether each measure was implemented as planned. • Summer 2014 Performance Assessment • This provides an analysis of the observed performance and of the achievement of the planned capacity increase. ACC
performance has been assessed by analysing traffic and delay statistics for each ACC and the evolution of the capacity baseline. Where relevant, other significant factors were also taken into account, such as industrial action or planned major events that resulted in a temporary reduction in capacity.
• Allocation of and reasons for En-route delay • The table lists the reference locations (sectors) causing most of the ACC delay, the number of minutes of en-route delay
attributed to each location and the percentage of the total ACC en-route delay. The graph shows the total ATFM en-route delay generated by each ACC, broken down into the 5 most significant reasons given for the delay in 2014 compared to 2013.
Note: The scale on all graphs varies from ACC to ACC - graphs should not be directly compared.
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 2
ALBANIA TIRANA ACC 1.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan 5% Achieved Comments ATS route network improvements No No requirements
Availability of new ATCOs (14 OJT in 2014) Yes Major part have finished successfully OJT
Standby and flexible shifts No No due to lack of staff. Planned 2015
Longer periods with 4 sectors open (3 + 1) if needed Yes But no requirements
Maximum configuration: 3/4 ENR + 1 APP sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated at 65, the same level as last year. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 55 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 49.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 831 880 926 984 959Summer Traffic 617 671 666 704 692Yearly Traffic 497 541 533 550 543Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Enr
oute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LAAAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Tirana LAAA ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes Shortest Routes
Year H: 1.8% B: 0.7 % L: -0.6%
-19% -1.2% 0.00 0.20
Summer -1.7% 0.00 0.27 No 65 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 3
ARMENIA YEREVAN ACC 2.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight remained at zero in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan: Sufficient Capacity to meet demand Comments
Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated with CAPAN at 40. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 12 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 9.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Summer Traffic 150 162 156 143 140Yearly Traffic 145 157 153 143 139Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
125
130
135
140
145
150
155
160
165
Enr
oute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
UDDDACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Yerevan UDDD ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 12.0% B: 9.4% L: 7.9%
No significant impact
-3.3% 0.00 0.06
Summer -2.5% 0.00 0.09 No 40 (+60%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 4
AUSTRIA VIENNA ACC 3.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.3 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan 7 % Achieved Comments Enhanced sectorization according to the FAB CE Airspace Plan Yes
Improved operational procedures including FMP/AMC Yes
Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM Yes
6 additional controllers Yes
Re-assessment of sector capacities according to CAPAN study Yes
Additional sectors as required, depending on traffic demand levels Yes
Stepped improved sectorisation according to on-going projects Yes
Improved procedures with EDDM APP Yes DCTs H24/7 345+ in parallel ops with ATS routes Yes
Maximum configuration: 13 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 189, 6% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 178 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 165.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 2598 2782 2788 2733 3060Summer Traffic 2293 2347 2303 2275 2481Yearly Traffic 1969 2015 1961 1916 2057Summer enroute delay (all causes) 2.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0
0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.02.22.4
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Enr
oute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LOVVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LOVVSOU 13 24.9%2014 LOVVELUH 12 21.6%2014 LOVVSHT 8 14.4%2014 LOVVEAL1 4 7.1%2014 LOVVWB5T 3 5.9%2014 LOVVNCR 3 5.4%
0
50
100
150
200
250
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Vienna ACC en-route delays in 2014
Vienna LOVV ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 2.0% B: 0.3% L: -1.3%
+16% +7.3% 0.03 0.23
Summer +9.1% 0.04 0.24 No 189 (+6%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 5
AZERBAIJAN BAKU ACC 4.
Traffic & Delay
Data Source: STATFOR
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight remained at zero in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan: Sufficient Capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments ATS route network optimisation - an on-going process in co-operation with neighboring States Yes
Building of new Baku ATC Center. Installation of new ATC system Final Phase Yes
Operations from new ATCC have been launched since March 01, 2014
Resectorisation of airspace structure Implementation Yes
Resectorisation has been implemented since March 06, 2014
Maximum configuration: 5 + 3APP Yes
New configuration has been implemented since March 06, 2014
Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated at 65. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 32 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 18.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Summer Traffic 337 354 367 354 353Yearly Traffic 329 339 356 352 348Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
310
320
330
340
350
360
370
Enr
oute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
UBBAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Baku UBBA ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes Shortest Routes
Year H: 5.6% B: 3.8% L: 1.5%
No significant impact
-1.2% 0.00 0.23 Summer -0.2% 0.00 0.21 No 65 (+63%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 6
BELGIUM BRUSSELS ACC 5.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.13 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.03 minutes per flight in 2014.
Capacity Plan 0% Achieved Comments Dynamic use of sector configurations Yes
Enhancement of ATFCM procedures Yes
Improved use of the route network as a result of FUA enhancement No
Maximum configuration: 7 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 125 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 111.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 1906 1997 1926 1916 1964Summer Traffic 1615 1673 1644 1634 1691Yearly Traffic 1471 1547 1503 1483 1525Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
EBBUACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 EBBUEEC 10 35.7%2014 EBBUNWC 6 21.0%2014 EBBUALL 5 17.9%2014 EBBUESC 3 10.9%2014 EBBUHLC 2 7.7%2014 EBBRTA 1 3.5%
0
20
40
60
80
100
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Brussels ACC en-route delays in 2014
Brussels EBBU ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes Shortest Routes
Year H: 1.1% B: 0.8% L: -0.8%
-6% +2.9% 0.02 0.21
Summer +3.5% 0.03 0.29 No 131 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 7
BULGARIA SOFIA ACC 6.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Sofia LBSR ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes Shortest Routes
Year H: 5.4% B: 3.5% L: 1.5%
-4% +24.8% 0.00 0.12
Summer +25.9% 0.00 0.18 No 172 (+15%)
The en-route delay per flight remained at zero during Summer 2014.
Planned capacity increase: sufficient capacity Achieved Comments ATS route network development and increase of maximum sector configurations available Yes
Maximum configuration: 12 sectors Yes Maximum configuration: 10 sectors was sufficient
Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS and was assessed to be at 172. During the period June/July, the average peak 1 hour demand was 163 flights and the average peak 3 hour demand was 150 flights.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 2150 2337 2253 2316 2875Summer Traffic 1677 1802 1807 1871 2355Yearly Traffic 1322 1418 1422 1460 1822Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Enr
oute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LBSRACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 8
CROATIA ZAGREB ACC 7.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.14 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.49 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 43% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 39% for weather, 10% for ATC Equipment and 7% for ATC Staffing. Capacity plan: 1% Achieved Comments
10 additional ATCOs Yes
Optimization of manpower planning Yes
Enhanced ATFM techniques through cooperative traffic management Yes
Implementation of Mode S – DAP functionality (COOPANS) No Postponed to February 2015
Modernisation of ATM system with enhanced functionalities (SESAR compliant) Yes
Improved sector opening times Yes
Enhanced sectorisation according to the FAB CE Airspace Plan Yes
Further cross-border FRA evolutions, optimisation of ATS route network Yes
Maximum configuration: 10/11 sectors Yes Maximum configuration: 10 sectors
Summer 2014 performance assessment
The capacity baseline was measured using ACCESS at 143. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 143, and the average peak 3 hour demand was 129.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 1974 2247 2407 2410 2498Summer Traffic 1500 1626 1635 1666 1775Yearly Traffic 1177 1287 1286 1281 1355Summer enroute delay (all causes) 1.7 0.9 0.4 0.1 0.5Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 1.1 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.3
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LDZOACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LDZOULW 111 25.0%2014 LDZON 78 17.4%2014 LDZOTHW 58 13.1%2014 LDZOULA 48 10.7%2014 LDZOTHS 33 7.5%2014 LDZOTHN 29 6.6%
0
50
100
150
200
250
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Zagreb ACC en-route delays in 2014
Zagreb LDZO ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes Shortest Routes
Year H: 2.6% B: 0.8% L: -0.8%
+6% +5.8% 0.33 0.21
Summer +6.5% 0.49 0.27 Yes 143 (+1%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 9
CYPRUS NICOSIA ACC 8.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight decreased from 2.7 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 1.38 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 44% of delays were due to ATC capacity, 43% due to airspace management, and 9% due to ATC staffing. Capacity Plan: 1% Achieved Comments Continuous improvement of ATS route network Yes Through Blue Med & Ten-T FRA project
Implementation of TOPSKY (Sept 2013) Yes Finalised in February 2014
New ATC tools and new safety nets Yes TOP SKY C Tools
Improved ATFCM, including more flexibility in sector configuration openings Yes New sector configurations introduced and applied
Reduction of 4 sector opening hours due to reduction of overtime budget No Up to 5 sectors were opened
Improve Civil-Military cooperation in the South-East part of the FIR Yes Due to short notice given for activation/deactivation of D-areas, pre-tactical or tactical planning was not optimised. This was primarily due to the Israel-Gaza situation and the operation of RAF-LCRA
OLDI with Athens and Egypt No Done with Athens, November 2014
Benefits from CPR exchange with NM No Partly FSA completed. CPR is planned for early 2015 due to delay by NM (SITA)
Revision of sector capacities Yes Revised on 8 October 2014
Maximum configuration: 4 sectors Yes Up to 5 sectors were opened
Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 55, 15% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 59 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 52.
Allocation of and Reasons for Enroute Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 1085 1170 1049 1095 1176Summer Traffic 849 855 819 844 944Yearly Traffic 776 770 736 760 834Summer enroute delay (all causes) 3.9 1.7 1.6 2.7 1.4Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 3.6 1.6 1.6 2.2 1.9
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Enr
oute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LCCCACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Nicosia LCCC ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) Enroute Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes Shortest Routes
Year H: 11.1% B: 9.7% L: 7.5%
No significant impact
+9.8% 1.91 0.30 Summer +11.8% 1.38 0.29 Yes 55 (+15%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 10
CZECH REPUBLIC PRAGUE ACC 9.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.07 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.02 minutes per flight in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan: 1% Achieved Comments
Improved flow and capacity management techniques, including STAM Yes
Adaptation of sector opening times depending on available staff Yes
Improved ATS route network – Stepped implementation of FRA Yes
Additional controllers No
Enhanced sectorisation according to the FAB CE Airspace Plan Yes
Minor improvements of system functionalities Yes
New sectorisation (Autumn 2013) Yes Implemented in Oct 2013, adjusted in Spring 2014
Datalink No
Maximum configuration: 9/10 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS and was assessed to be at 162. The peak 1 hour demand was 159 flights and the peak 3 hour demand was 146 flights.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 2306 2386 2338 2358 2416Summer Traffic 2032 2078 2017 2063 2120Yearly Traffic 1771 1841 1793 1804 1849Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Enr
oute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LKAAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LKAAM 8 35.7%2014 LKAANM 3 16.5%2014 LKAAL 3 12.4%2014 LKAANSHT 2 9.8%2014 LKAASM 1 5.4%2014 LKAAWM 1 4.4%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Prague ACC en-route delays in 2014
Prague LKAA ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 1.4% B: 0.0% L: -2.0%
-13% +2.5% 0.01 0.15
Summer +2.8% 0.02 0.25 No 162 (+1%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 11
DENMARK COPENHAGEN ACC 10.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan 1 % Achieved Comments Continuous improvements on the ATS route network Yes
Optimizing the use of FRA when military areas are active Yes
Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand Yes
Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 8 sectors Yes
Minor updates of COOPANS Yes
Maximum configuration: 4/5 (E) + 3 (W) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 117 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 108.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 1793 1769 1688 1781 1765Summer Traffic 1519 1562 1485 1580 1571Yearly Traffic 1403 1476 1409 1459 1464Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Enr
oute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
EKDKACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Copenhagen EKDK ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 2.0% B: 0.4% L: -1.3%
+3% +0.3% 0.00 0.07
Summer -0.6% 0.00 0.12 No 125 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 12
ESTONIA TALLINN ACC 11.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight remained at almost zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014
Capacity Plan: Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments New routes Yes
Adaptation of sector opening times Yes
Additional OLDI functions Yes
Maximum configuration: 2 (+1 FEEDER) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline of 63 was measured with ACCESS, indicating the capacity actually offered. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 53 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 47.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 522 597 632 621 651Summer Traffic 449 517 544 537 567Yearly Traffic 410 468 493 485 508Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
EETTACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 EETTFED 9 56.7%2014 EETTEST 5 28.7%2014 EETTWES 1 7.6%2014 EETTALL 1 6.5%2014 EETNTA 0 0.5% 0
5
10
15
20
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Tallinn ACC en-route delays in 2014
Tallinn EETT ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 1.7% B: 0.1% L: -1.2%
No significant impact
+4.7% 0.03 0.22 Summer +5.6% 0.05 0.30 No 63 (+2%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 13
EUROCONTROL MAASTRICHT ACC 12.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.07 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.25 minutes per flight in 2014. 51% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 30% for Weather, and 19% for Other. Capacity Plan 2% Achieved Comments Stepped implementation of MARS2 (including Dynamic Sectorisation) No Stopped
Traffic Management System (TMS) Level 2 No Renamed iFMP – planned for 2015
CPDLC monitoring concept & reduction in verbal coordination No
Improved ATFCM including STAM Yes
LUX High Implementation Yes
VDFL DECO Sectors Yes Maximum configuration: 20 sectors (Possible if required according to traffic levels) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 329. During the same period, the peak 3 hour demand was 335 and the peak 1 hour was 317.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 5113 5348 5244 5349 5530Summer Traffic 4627 4788 4793 4941 5043Yearly Traffic 4174 4407 4389 4474 4581Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
EDYYUAC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 EDYYB3EH 211 27.5%2014 EDYYB3WH 141 18.3%2014 EDYYBOLN 74 9.6%2014 EDYYD4WH 61 8.0%2014 EDYYB3WL 44 5.7%2014 EDYYB3LL 39 5.0%
0
100
200
300
400
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Maastricht UAC en-route delays in 2014
Maastricht EDYY UAC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 1.0% B: -0.1% L: -1.5%
+5% +2.4% 0.17 0.22
Summer +2.1% 0.25 0.24 No 329 (-2%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 14
FINLAND TAMPERE ACC 13.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan: Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments Maintain number of controllers Yes
Maximum configuration: 6 + 3 feeders Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline was estimated at the same level as last year. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 40 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 33.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 645 711 620 592 594Summer Traffic 472 537 480 451 465Yearly Traffic 459 533 485 451 459Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2
0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.01.1
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Enr
oute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
EFINCTA - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 EFINABCDEF 34 44.6%2014 EFINEFG 8 10.9%2014 EFINALL 8 10.3%2014 EFINGKLMN 7 0.0932014 EFINABCD 5 0.0672014 EFIN7AG 4 0.059
0
20
40
60
80
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Tampere ACC en-route delays in 2014
Tampere EFIN CTA
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 0.9% B: -0.6% L: -2.2%
No significant impact
+1.8% 0.16 0.16 Summer +3.0% 0.00 0.12 No 58 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 15
FRANCE BORDEAUX ACC 14.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.5 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.3 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 34% of the delays were due to the reason Special Event, 24% due to ATC Capacity, 24% due to Industrial Action (ATC), 8% due to Equipment (ATC) and 9% due to Weather. Capacity Plan 0 % Achieved Comments Improved Airspace Management / FUA Yes
Staff deployment / Flexible rostering Yes
Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Yes
ESSO project study No Re-alignment with the projects related to the French-Spanish interface
Improvement of profiles for LFPO arrivals from the south-west (IBBP) – Dualisation of UN859 Yes
FABEC FRA Step 1 : WE DCTs No
Maximum configuration: 21 UCESO Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 196 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 185.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 2837 2945 2978 3066 3183Summer Traffic 2434 2557 2575 2615 2668Yearly Traffic 2114 2238 2222 2238 2282Summer enroute delay (all causes) 1.5 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.3Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 1.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LFBBALL - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LFBBP123 92 17.6%2014 LFBBRL12 77 14.6%2014 LFBBR4 56 10.7%2014 LFBBX4 46 8.7%2014 LFBBUSUD 39 7.4%2014 LFBBRL 29 5.4%
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Bordeaux ACC en-route delays in 2014
Bordeaux LFBB ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 1.9% B: 0.7% L: -0.3%
+4% +2.0% 0.23 0.13
Summer +2.0% 0.34 0.20 No 201 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 16
FRANCE BREST ACC 15.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay increased from 0.5 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.6 minutes per flight over the same period in 2014. 52% of the delays were due to the reason Industrial Action (ATC), and 42% due to ATC Capacity. Capacity Plan 2 % Achieved Comments Improved airspace management / FUA Yes
Staff redeployment / flexible rostering Yes
Improvement of ATFCM procedures and STAM Yes
DFL change in V, W and K sectors Yes
Change to G and A sectors limits Yes Improvement of profiles for LFPO arrivals from the south-west (IBBP) – Dualisation of UN859 Yes
IBP project - New interface between France & UK No
FABEC FRA Step 1 : WE DCTs No
Maximum configuration: 18 UCESO No Maximum configuration: 17 UCESO Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 209, 1% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 221 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 207.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 3165 3347 3294 3345 3550Summer Traffic 2560 2800 2752 2850 2980Yearly Traffic 2229 2440 2398 2457 2559Summer enroute delay (all causes) 3.5 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.6Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 2.3 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LFRRACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LFRREST 159 11.7%2014 LFRRMZU 136 10.0%2014 LFRRMZS 95 7.0%2014 LFRRN 93 6.9%2014 LFRRNU 81 5.9%2014 LFRRNGA 79 5.8%
0
200
400
600
800
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Brest ACC en-route delays in 2014
Brest LFRR ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 3.4% B: 2.2% L: 0.9%
No sig. impact
+4.2% 0.53 0.08 Summer +4.6% 0.63 0.11 Yes 209 (+1%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 17
FRANCE MARSEILLE ACC 16.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay increased from 0.7 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.9 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 48% of the delays were due to the reason Industrial Action (ATC), 32% due to ATC Capacity, 8% due to Equipment (ATC), 6% due to Weather and 4% due to ATC Staffing. Capacity Plan 3% Achieved Comments Improved airspace management / FUA Yes Staff redeployment / flexible rostering Yes Improved ATFM procedures and STAM Yes
Reorganisation of interface with LECB (LUMAS) Phase 2 Partially
Improved airspace availability around D54 during 15 June – 15 Sept period Re-alignment with the projects related to the French-Spanish interface
Reorganisation of lower airspace and delegation of ATS to APP units below FL145 No New upper level of sectors ML, LO and LS Partially Done for ML Creation of 4th layer Yes Done for the West FABEC FRA Step 1 : WE DCTs No Maximum configuration: 28 UCESO Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 252 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 233.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 3898 3928 3929 3999 4032Summer Traffic 3162 3257 3268 3271 3269Yearly Traffic 2732 2806 2763 2746 2730Summer enroute delay (all causes) 4.4 0.8 0.5 0.7 0.9Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 3.0 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.6
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LFMMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LFMMWM 205 13.2%2014 LFMMFDZ 178 11.5%2014 LFMMMALY 156 10.0%2014 LFMMB3 128 8.2%2014 LFMMRAEE 114 7.3%2014 LFMMGY 94 6.0%
0
200
400
600
800
1000
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Marseille ACC en-route delays in 2014
Marseille LFMM ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 0.4% B: -0.8% L: -1.7%
No sig. impact
-0.6% 0.57 0.10 Summer -0.1% 0.86 0.17 Yes 238 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 18
FRANCE PARIS ACC 17.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay remained at 0.2 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 39% of the delays were due to the reason Weather, 38% due to ATC Capacity, 13% due to Industrial Action (ATC), and 5% due to Airspace Management. Capacity Plan 3% Achieved Comments Improved airspace management / FUA Yes Staff redeployment / flexible rostering Yes Improved ATFCM procedures and STAM / GF project* Yes Reorganisation of lower airspace and delegation of ATS to APP units below FL145 (for relevant airspace) Yes Improvement of profiles for LFPO arrivals from the south-west (IBBP) Yes IBP project - New interface between France & UK Yes Phase 1 completed Point Merge NW Yes FABEC FRA Step 1 : WE DCTs No Maximum configuration: 22 UCESO No Maximum configuration:21 sectors Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 254 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 231.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 3823 4017 4000 3863 3904Summer Traffic 3334 3462 3429 3309 3353Yearly Traffic 3122 3284 3227 3107 3125Summer enroute delay (all causes) 1.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2
0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.01.11.2
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LFFFALL - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LFFFTE 148 27.4%2014 LFFFUJ 106 19.7%2014 LFFFLMH 100 18.5%2014 LFFFTNTB 14 2.5%2014 LFFFMHPT 13 2.5%2014 LFFFUKUZ 12 2.2%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Paris ACC en-route delays in 2014
Paris LFFF ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 1.7% B: 1.0% L: -0.1%
No sig. impact
+0.6% 0.17 0.20 Summer +1.3% 0.20 0.20 No 268 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 19
FRANCE REIMS ACC 18.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay increased from 0.5 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.6 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 80% of the delays were due to ATC Capacity, and 14% due to Weather. Capacity Plan 3% Achieved Comments Improved airspace management / FUA Yes Staff redeployment / flexible rostering Yes Improved ATFCM procedures and STAM Yes Reorganisation of lower airspace ELLX interface No Upgraded ops room Yes FABEC FRA Step 1: WE DCTs No Maximum configuration: 18 UCESO No Maximum configuration: 16 UCESO Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 186. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 199 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 186.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 2743 2795 2903 3030 3193Summer Traffic 2372 2537 2587 2719 2832Yearly Traffic 2142 2311 2334 2430 2522Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LFEEACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LFEEHYR 266 25.0%2014 LFEEUXR 113 10.7%2014 LFEE4E 90 8.4%2014 LFEEKR 76 7.1%2014 LFEEKD 68 6.4%2014 LFEEXR 63 5.9%
0
200
400
600
800
1000
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Reims ACC en-route delays in 2014
Reims LFEE ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 1.3% B: 0.4% L: -0.8%
+11% +3.8% 0.42 0.14
Summer +4.2% 0.60 0.21 Yes 186 (-3%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 20
FYROM SKOPJE ACC 19.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The delays remained at zero during Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan 10% Achieved Comments Controller ratings Yes
New sector configurations and revised DFL Yes
Dynamic changing of DFL is needed – current system capabilities are limited, full dynamic DFL is expected with the new system in 2017
Revised sector capacities Yes Maximum configuration: 3 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the measured period the average peak 1 hour was 45 and the average peak 1 hour was 40.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 635 696 642 661 834Summer Traffic 467 465 418 424 566Yearly Traffic 340 340 306 301 389Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LWSSACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Skopje LWSS ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 6.4% B: 5.3% L: 4.3%
+61% +29.5% 0.00 0.14
Summer +33.4% 0.00 0.19 No 59 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 21
GERMANY BREMEN ACC 20.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Summer 2014 performance assessment
The summer traffic increased by 3.4%. The Average ATFM Delay En-route per Movement was stable at 0.1 min/flight in Summer 2014. The delays were mainly due to ATC Staffing (16%), ATC Capacity (32%) and Weather (45%).
It is assessed that the offered capacity was the same as 2013. The ADM Summer is nearly by the EU reference value. There no capacity deficit was observed.
A maximum configuration of 17+4 consists of 14 en-route sectors and 3 en-route/APP- sectors (Hamburg, Hannover) and 4 APP/TMA- sectors (Berlin). The offered configuration of 14+4 with 11 en-route sectors was opened during the whole
year. The ALLER LOW sector was combined, the sectors EIDER EAST and MÜRITZ LOW were only open for military exercises.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 2251 2228 2239 2136 2192Summer Traffic 1836 1830 1826 1777 1839Yearly Traffic 1661 1709 1674 1628 1683Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Enr
oute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
EDWWACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 EDWWHAMC 35 23.8%2014 EDWWHEIC 30 21.0%2014 EDWWDBAS 28 19.6%2014 EDWWDBAN 25 17.5%2014 EDWWHEI 11 7.8%2014 EDWWFLG 11 7.7%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Bremen ACC en-route delays in 2014
Bremen EDWW ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons
ACC Reference Value
Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 0.2% B: -0.9% L: -2.7%
No significant impact
+3.4% 0.09 0.10 Summer
+3.4% 0.11 0.10 No 151 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 22
GERMANY KARLSRUHE ACC 21.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Planned Measures Achieved Comments
SENEKA Phase I Dual ATS routes (09.01.2014) The realisation was completed successfully on 09.01.2014
FRAMaK Free Route Airspace Karlsruhe/Maastricht Phase 4 The realisation was completed
successfully on 01.05.2014
Reduction of staffing problems
FABEC South East SWAP postponed
Testing extension ED R307 (EUFI) Prolonged until the end of 2016
Summer 2014 performance assessment
The summer traffic growth reaches 3.1% and is significantly higher than expected. The Average ATFM Delay en-route per Movement increased slightly to 0.3 min./flight compare to the previous summer period. The delays were mainly due to
ATC Staffing (15%), ATC Capacity (17%) and Weather (56%). The high summer delay was generated primarily by Weather. No capacity deficit was observed
The offered capacity increased continuously in 2014. A maximum configuration of 40 en-route sectors was available; the OSTSEE sector was mostly combined (offered configuration of 39 sectors).
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 4703 4795 4748 5600 5746Summer Traffic 4233 4305 4345 5088 5245Yearly Traffic 3743 3871 3905 4501 4631Summer enroute delay (all causes) 1.7 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.3Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 1.4 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
EDUUUAC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 EDUUNTM33 127 13.5%2014 EDUUALP13 86 9.2%2014 EDUUCHI1K 56 5.9%2014 EDUUWUR34 49 5.2%2014 EDUUTGO2C 47 5.0%2014 EDUUSPE1P 41 4.4%
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Karlsruhe UAC en-route delays in 2014
Karlsruhe EDUU ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons
ACC Reference Value
Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 0.6% B: -0.7% L: -2.2%
+5% +2.9% 0.20 0.20
Summer +3.1% 0.34 0.22 No 347 (+4%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 23
GERMANY LANGEN ACC 22.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Planned Measures Achieved Comments
Upgrade of P1/ATCAS system (PSS) EBG03/04 The realisation was completed successfully on 13.04.2014
Upgrade of P1/ATCAS system (PSS) EBG05/06 The realisation was completed successfully on Sep./Dec.2014
Reduction of staffing problems The share of delay caused by ATC Staffing decreased from 30% in 2013 to 20% in 2014
Summer 2014 performance assessment
The summer traffic increased in 2014 compared to 2013 by 0.1%. The Average ATFM Delay en-route per Movement was increased slightly to 0.35 min/flight in Summer 2014 compared to the last year. The delays were mainly due to ATC Staffing (20%), ATC Capacity (22%) and
Weather (35%). The offered capacity was also stable in 2014. The ADM in summer is higher than the reference value. No capacity deficit was observed.
A maximum configuration of 23+13 consists of 23 en-route sectors (including 3 sectors with predominantly military traffic) and 2 en-route /APP- sectors (Stuttgart) and 11 APP/TMA- sectors (Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Cologne/Bonn – 2 sectors always combined). The offered configuration is
23+12 sectors.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 4271 4138 4190 4073 4122Summer Traffic 3699 3654 3688 3640 3642Yearly Traffic 3382 3434 3377 3319 3317Summer enroute delay (all causes) 1.2 1.4 0.9 0.3 0.3Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
Enr
oute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
EDGGACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 EDGGSITA 105 12.9%2014 EDGGKNG 83 10.3%2014 EDGGPAD 69 8.6%2014 EDGG1 66 8.2%2014 EDGG7 61 7.6%2014 EDGGDLA 57 7.0%
0
100
200
300
400
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Langen ACC en-route delays in 2014
Langen EDGG ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: -0.1% B: -1.5% L: -2.8%
No significant impact
+0.0% 0.24 0.17 Summer
+0.1% 0.34 0.20 No 254 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 24
GERMANY MUNICH ACC 23.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Planned Measures Achieved Comments
Re-structure airspace – FÜSSEN, ZUGSPITZE and STARNBERG sector (2013) The realisation was completed successfully on
31.12.2013
Testing extension ED R207 (EUFI) The realisation was completed successfully on 10.12.2014
Summer 2014 performance assessment
The summer traffic decreased by 0.9%. The Average ATFM Delay En-route per Movement is nearly 0.0 minutes/flight, as in the previous summer period. The delays were mainly due to Weather (95%), ATC Capacity and ATC Staffing (3%). The ADM summer 2014 was below the
reference value. The maximum configuration of 18+4 sectors consists of 15 en-route sectors and 3 en-route /APP- sectors (Nuremberg, Dresden and Leipzig)
and 4 APP/TMA- sectors (Munich). The offered configuration has 15+4 sectors – three en-route sectors (FRANKEN Upper/High, NÖRDLINGEN/WALDA and SACHSEN Low/ High) are mostly combined.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 4912 5012 4798 3593 3543Summer Traffic 4468 4504 4390 3126 3099Yearly Traffic 3979 4080 3911 2876 2846Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Enr
oute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
EDMMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 EDMMFRKHU 21 31.6%2014 EDMMCN2 12 18.5%2014 EDMMFUE 5 7.3%2014 EDMMSAS 5 6.9%2014 EDMMZUS 4 6.5%2014 EDMMTEG 4 5.7%
0
50
100
150
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Munich ACC en-route delays in 2014
Munich EDMM ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 0.2% B: -1.2% L: -2.5%
-10% -1.1% 0.02 0.21
Summer -0.9% 0.04 0.24 No 246 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 25
GREECE ATHENS ACC 24.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.11 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.67 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 55% of delays were due to the reason ATC staffing and 43% due ATC capacity. Capacity Plan 1% Achieved Comments Improved ATS route network and airspace management Yes Improved civil/military coordination Yes ATFCM actions (traffic volume monitoring, traffic management scenarios etc…) Yes 4 additional OLDI messages for silent radar transfers No OLDI with Nicosia (Athens ready) No Implemented November 2014 FDPS upgrade including FPL 2012 No Maximum configuration: 5/6 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 118, 4% lower than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 120 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 111.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 2117 2211 2197 2306 2421Summer Traffic 1513 1555 1521 1561 1720Yearly Traffic 1212 1230 1195 1195 1291Summer enroute delay (all causes) 1.8 5.2 0.3 0.1 0.7Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 1.1 3.3 0.2 0.1 0.4
0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.5
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LGGGACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LGGGKFPL 137 23.7%2014 LGGGMIL 129 22.2%2014 LGGGRDS 106 18.2%2014 LGGGMILL 103 17.8%2014 LGGGRDSL 65 11.2%2014 LGGGW 15 2.6%
0
100
200
300
400
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Athens ACC en-route delays in 2014
Athens LGGG ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 3.1% B: 2.1% L: 0.4%
No significant impact
+8.0% 0.45 0.20 Summer
+10.2% 0.67 0.27 Yes 118 (-4%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 26
GREECE MAKEDONIA ACC 25.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay increased to 0.24 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 43% of delays were due to the reason ATC staffing, 43% due ATC capacity and 11% due to Equipment (ATC). Capacity Plan 1% Achieved Comments Improved ATS route network and airspace management Yes Improved civil/military coordination Yes ATFCM actions (traffic volume monitoring, traffic management scenarios etc…) Yes 4 additional OLDI messages for silent radar transfers No Resectorisation resulting from the opening of KFOR sector Yes FDPS upgrade including FPL 2012 No Maximum configuration: 4/5 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 100, 2% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 99 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 90.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 1623 1729 1708 1721 1942Summer Traffic 1264 1258 1268 1264 1413Yearly Traffic 982 976 961 939 1032Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.6 1.9 0.1 0.0 0.2Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.4 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Enr
oute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LGMDACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LGMDW 86 49.1%2014 LGMDKVL 31 17.5%2014 LGMDEL 18 10.6%2014 LGMDELM 18 10.1%2014 LGMDEUM 15 8.6%2014 LGMDKVLU 2 1.1%
0
20
40
60
80
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Makedonia ACC en-route delays in 2014
Makedonia LGMD ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 5.3% B: 3.7% L: 2.3%
+3% +9.8% 0.17 0.21
Summer +11.8% 0.24 0.28 No 100 (+2%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 27
HUNGARY BUDAPEST ACC 26.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan +2.5% Achieved Comments Optimization of airspace structure Yes FRA (H24, all levels) from 2015.02.05.
Recruitment and training of controllers Yes 6 ACC trainees licenced in 2014, 6 will start OJT in early 2015
Maximum configuration: 10 sectors Yes Max 8 sector configuration was required in 2014
Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 177, 7% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 165 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 147.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 2338 2434 2316 2353 2808Summer Traffic 1947 1913 1847 1904 2147Yearly Traffic 1612 1594 1526 1566 1754Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LHCCACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Budapest LHCC ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 4.1% B: 2.5% L: 0.5%
-11% +12.0% 0.00 0.07
Summer +12.7% 0.00 0.11 No 177 (+7%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 28
IRELAND DUBLIN ACC 27.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014 as in 2013.
Capacity Plan: 0% Achieved Comments Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes On-going recruitment to maintain staff levels Yes Cross rating training Yes UK / Ireland FAB initiatives Yes Maximum configuration: 4 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline was estimated at the same level as last year. The peak 1 hour demand was 48 and the peak 3 hour demand was 40.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 619 623 624 634 659Summer Traffic 537 529 544 568 595Yearly Traffic 481 489 491 509 537Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
EIDWACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Dublin EIDW ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 0.0% B: 0.7% L: 0.0%
No significant impact
+5.4% 0.00 0.23 Summer
+4.8% 0.00 0.31 No 59 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 29
IRELAND SHANNON ACC 28.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014 as in 2013.
Capacity Plan: 2% Achieved Comments Extra sectors as required – Dynamic sectorisation available Yes FAB dynamic sectorisation - Trials Yes Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes CPDLC Yes On-going recruitment to maintain staff levels Yes UK / Ireland FAB initiatives Yes Developing Queue Management programme Yes Maximum configuration: 12 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACCESS measured baseline of 124 indicates the capacity available during the measured period. The peak 1 hour demand was 106 and the peak 3 hour demand was 97.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 1501 1470 1381 1467 1578Summer Traffic 1184 1199 1189 1199 1250Yearly Traffic 1072 1089 1075 1074 1086Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
EISNACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Shannon EISN ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 1.9% B: 1.0% L: 0.5%
No significant impact
+1.1% 0.00 0.08 Summer
+4.3% 0.00 0.15 No 124 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 30
ITALY BRINDISI ACC 29.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero, the same as during Summer 2013. Note: The area of responsibility of Brindisi ACC changed in April 2014. Capacity: 71 Achieved Comments Flexible opening scheme according to traffic demand and system enablers implementation Yes
Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes Airspace management and ATS route assessment and/or improvements according to network needs, Airspace Users expectations, ENAV’s Flight Efficiency Plan and BLUEMED FAB implementation
Yes
Free-route implementation program Yes Mode S implementation Yes Airspace and configuration re-organization Yes Maximum configuration: 4 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 82. During the measured period (June and July), the average peak 1 hour demand was 69 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 62.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 1434 1459 1349 1377 1273Summer Traffic 1035 1054 978 961 884Yearly Traffic 863 872 808 786 730Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LIBBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Brindisi LIBB ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast
Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 4.0% (-14%) B: 2.3% (-14%) L: 0.1% (-14%)
+3%
-7.1% 0.01 0.03 Summer
-8.0% 0.01 0.05 No 82 (-30%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 31
ITALY MILAN ACC 30.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero, the same as during Summer 2013. Note: the area of responsibility of Milano ACC changed in May 2014. Capacity: 185 Achieved Comments Flexible opening scheme according to traffic demand and system enablers implementation Yes
Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes Airspace management and ATS route assessment and/or improvements according to network needs, Airspace Users, ENAV’s Flight Efficiency Plan and/or BLUEMED FAB implementation Yes Mode S implementation (Dec 2013) Yes Free-route implementation program Yes Airspace and configuration re-organization Yes Implementation of CDO in LIML according to ENV01 Yes PBN Program Yes Maximum configuration: 19 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 188. During the measured period (June and July), the average peak 1 hour demand was 183 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 171.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 2153 2198 2165 2020 2893Summer Traffic 1888 1893 1853 1754 2441Yearly Traffic 1701 1719 1659 1567 1973Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Enr
oute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LIMMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LIMME 27 45.1%2014 LIMMWC 23 37.8%2014 LIMMALL 10 17.0%
0
20
40
60
80
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Milano ACC en-route delays in 2014
Milan LIMM ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast
Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 1.3% (+32%) B: -0.2% (+32%) L: -1.7% (+32%)
No sig. impact
+25.9% 0.03 0.09 Summer
+39.2% 0.00 0.16 No 188 (+15%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 32
ITALY PADOVA ACC 31.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero, the same as during Summer 2013.
Capacity Plan: 2% Achieved Comments Flexible opening scheme according to traffic demand and system enablers implementation Yes
Airspace management and ATS route assessment and/or improvements according to network needs, Airspace Users expectations, ENAV’s Flight Efficiency Plan and/or BLUEMED FAB implementation
Yes
Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes Implementation of CDO in LIPZ according to ENV01 Yes Mode S implementation Yes Free-route implementation program Yes PBN Program Yes Maximum configuration: 12 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 193, showing a 3% growth compared to Summer 2013. During the measured period (June and July) the average peak 1 hour demand was 182 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 169.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 2696 2755 2826 2869 2904Summer Traffic 2156 2210 2220 2207 2264Yearly Traffic 1792 1865 1844 1821 1854Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LIPPACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LIPPCTA 10 100.0%
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Padova ACC en-route delays in 2014
Padova LIPP ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 1.8% B: 0.2% L: -1.6%
No significant impact
+1.8% 0.01 0.10 Summer
+2.6% 0.01 0.16 No 193 (+3%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 33
ITALY ROME ACC 32.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero, the same as during Summer 2013. Note: the area of responsibility of Rome ACC changed in May 2014. Capacity Plan: Capacity: 184 Achieved Comments Flexible opening scheme according to traffic demand and system enablers implementation Yes
Airspace management and ATS route assessment and/or improvements according to network needs, Airspace Users expectations, ENAV’s Flight Efficiency Plan and/or BLUEMED FAB implementation
Yes
Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes Implementation of CDO in LIRF according to ENV01 Yes Free-route implementation program Yes Airspace and configuration re-organization Yes PBN Program Yes Maximum configuration: 19/21 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed measured at 198. During the measured period (June and July), the average peak 1 hour demand was 188 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 173.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 3725 3744 3798 3799 3060Summer Traffic 3109 3081 3068 3054 2477Yearly Traffic 2684 2662 2583 2565 2239Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Enr
oute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LIRRACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Rome LIRR ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast
Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 0.8% (-19%) B: -0.5% (-19%) L: -2.2% (-19%)
No sig. impact
-12.7% 0.00 0.06 Summer
-18.9% 0.00 0.10 No 198 (-19%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 34
LATVIA RIGA ACC 33.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments Various ATM system improvements Yes Maximum configuration: 3 + 2 APP Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline was estimated at the same level as in 2012. The average peak 1 hour demand was 68 and the peak 3 hour demand was 61 flights during the measured period, indicating that the ACC offered sufficient capacity to meet the demand.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 620 819 833 831 841Summer Traffic 516 716 704 714 738Yearly Traffic 477 639 634 642 659Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
EVRRACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Riga EVRR ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 2.4% B: 0.4% L: -1.5%
No significant impact
+2.6% 0.00 0.05 Summer
+3.3% 0.00 0.05 No 85 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 35
LITHUANIA VILNIUS ACC 34.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments Maximum configuration: 3 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. The peak 1 hour demand was 55 and the peak 3 hour demand was 51 during the measured period.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 681 691 685 738 804Summer Traffic 555 591 602 633 672Yearly Traffic 513 534 545 566 598Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
EYVCACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Vilnius EYVC ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 5.1% B: 3.0% L: 1.2%
No significant impact
+5.7% 0.00 0.06 Summer
+6.1% 0.00 0.09 No 77 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 36
MALTA MALTA ACC 35.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments 1 new Mode S radar Yes Maximum configuration: 2 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS. During June and July, the average peak 1 hour demand was 25 flights and the peak 3 hour demand was 21 flights per hour.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 385 366 389 415 392Summer Traffic 290 231 305 331 297Yearly Traffic 260 222 264 298 277Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LMMMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Malta LMMM ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 5.2% B: 4.4% L: -0.4%
-4% -7.1% 0.00 0.05
Summer -10.4% 0.00 0.06 No 39 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 37
MOLDOVA CHISINAU ACC 36.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero, as in Summer 2013.
Capacity Plan: Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments
Maximum configuration: 3 sectors Yes Maximum configuration: 2 sectors Sufficient to meet the traffic demand
Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated at 40. The peak 1 hour demand was 18 flights and the peak 3 hour demand was 15.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 241 256 284 330 279Summer Traffic 173 187 202 241 165Yearly Traffic 147 162 171 198 149Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LUUUACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Chisinau LUUU ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 3.5% B: 2.1% L: 0.3%
No significant impact
-24.8% 0.00 0.00 Summer
-31.7% 0.00 0.00 No 40 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 38
THE NETHERLANDS AMSTERDAM ACC 37.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight slightly increased from 0.15 minutes per flight during Summer 2013 to 0.17 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 68% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, and 28% for reason Weather. Capacity Plan 0% Achieved Comments Maximum configuration: 5 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 137, representing the delivered capacity. This was sufficient to accommodate the traffic demand, with an average peak 1 hour of 120 during the measured period and an average peak 3 hour of 108.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 1607 1673 1645 1657 1698Summer Traffic 1457 1532 1509 1534 1565Yearly Traffic 1330 1416 1393 1408 1441Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
EHAAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 EHAACBAS 187 97.6%2014 EHAASECT2 5 2.4%
0
50
100
150
200
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Amsterdam ACC en-route delays in 2014
Amsterdam EHAA ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 0.5% B: -0.1% L: -0.4%
No significant impact
+2.3% 0.13 0.18 Summer
+2.0% 0.17 0.20 No 137 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 39
NORWAY BODO ACC 38.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route delay per flight remained at 0.0 min/flight in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan: Sufficient capacity to meet expected demand Achieved Comments Flexible rostering of ATC staff Yes Recruitment and training to maintain number of air traffic controllers Yes
New ATM system in Bodo Oceanic No The system failed before implementation, still work in progress.
Maximum configuration: 6 + 1 oceanic Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the measured period, the average peak hour demand was 47 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 43.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 721 719 729 753 753Summer Traffic 557 558 572 588 609Yearly Traffic 534 544 555 565 589Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
ENBDACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 ENBDS 6 46.2%2014 ENBDALL 3 27.9%2014 ENBDNLE 2 13.8%2014 ENBDCHETA 1 10.2%2014 ENOBOA80 0 2.0% 0
5
10
15
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Bodo ACC en-route delays in 2014
Bodo ENBD ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 1.9% B: 1.4% L: 0.9%
No significant impact
+4.1% 0.02 0.02 Summer
+3.6% 0.04 0.00 No 57 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 40
NORWAY OSLO ACC 39.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.
Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments Additional controllers No New rostering, better efficiency. Flexible rostering of ATC staff Yes Enhanced sector configurations No Re-assessment of sector capacities following CAPAN study Yes Work in progress.
Maximum configuration: 5 (Summer), 7 (Winter) No Traffic during summer is equivalent or greater than winter, should be 7 for both.
Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity offered was measured with ACCESS at a level of 91, for an average peak demand of 82 (peak 1 hour) and 76 (peak 3 hour).
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 1154 1135 1135 1200 1224Summer Traffic 962 911 947 1018 1025Yearly Traffic 891 884 898 949 961Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
ENOSACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 ENOS1267 4 45.8%2014 ENOSFAR 3 38.4%2014 ENOS345 1 8.2%2014 ENOS67 1 7.6%2014 ENOS3458 0 0.0% 0
2
4
6
8
10
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Oslo ACC en-route delays in 2014
Oslo ENOS ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 4.5% B: 3.2% L: 2.1%
No significant impact
+1.2% 0.01 0.01 Summer
+0.7% 0.01 0.01 No 91 (+6%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 41
NORWAY STAVANGER ACC 40.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route delay per flight remained at 0.1 minutes per flight in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan 0% Achieved Comments Flexible rostering of ATC staff Yes Recruitment and training to maintain number of air traffic controllers Yes ADSB offshore Yes First to implement world wide New Voice Com System March 14 Yes Maximum configuration: 3 + 2 helicopter Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline of 63 was measured with ACCESS, indicating the capacity actually offered. During the measured period, the average peak demand was 57 (peak 1 hour) and 52 (peak 3 hour).
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 806 805 831 880 900Summer Traffic 575 619 653 696 708Yearly Traffic 541 588 625 663 677Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
ENSVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 ENSVSSX 28 88.6%2014 ENSV3 2 5.3%2014 ENZVTA 1 3.2%2014 ENSVE 0 1.4%2014 ENSV4 0 1.4%2014 ENSVN 0 0.1%
0
10
20
30
40
50
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Stavanger ACC en-route delays in 2014
Stavanger ENSV ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 3.8% B: 3.0% L: 2.2%
No significant impact
+2.0% 0.05 0.09 Summer
+1.6% 0.08 0.11 No 63 (+9%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 42
POLAND WARSAW ACC 41.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.51 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 1.14 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 63% of delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 13% for ATC Staffing, 10% for Weather and 9% for Special Event. Capacity Plan 0% Achieved Comments Mode S Yes
Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM Yes Flexible sector’s RATE and occupancy management. Successful usage of MCP
New ATM system in operation (Nov 2013) Yes Reached full flat performance in May 2014
4 ATCOs less Yes Improved sector configurations and management of configurations Yes
Increased number of available and useful configurations
Re-evaluation of sector capacities Yes
Maximum configuration: 9 sectors Yes 9 sector configuration used on demand up to 90 min. of duration
Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 135, 4% lower than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 150 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 141.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 2089 2222 2395 2414 2456Summer Traffic 1801 1954 2017 2063 2107Yearly Traffic 1594 1748 1806 1829 1851Summer enroute delay (all causes) 1.4 0.9 0.8 0.5 1.1Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.8
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
EPWWACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 EPWWJ 345 23.0%2014 EPWWG 319 21.3%2014 EPWWR 164 10.9%2014 EPWWD 147 9.8%2014 EPWWTC 138 9.2%2014 EPWWBD 106 7.1%
0
200
400
600
800
1000
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Warsaw ACC en-route delays in 2014
Warsaw EPWW ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 2.3% B: 0.2% L: -1.7%
No significant impact
+1.2% 0.81 0.26 Summer
+2.1% 1.14 0.28 Yes 135 (-4%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 43
PORTUGAL LISBON ACC 42.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.2 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.29 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 63% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, and 33% for ATC Staffing. Capacity Plan 8 % Achieved Comments Flexible rostering and sector opening schemes Yes Enhanced ATFCM procedures Yes Free route extension to LECM FIR Yes Reduction of separation minima from 8 to 5 NM No Postponed to Winter 2014/15 Update traffic volume definition to take new traffic pattern into account in line with the free route extension to LECM FIR Yes Vertical Split of West sector Yes Increase capacity in MAD sector Yes Area Proximity warning (APW) No Postponed to Winter 2014/15 Maximum configuration: 9 (7 ENR+2 TMA) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 94, 7% higher than in 2013. During the measured period (June and July AIRAC cycles), the average peak 1 hour demand was 94 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 85.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 1473 1484 1516 1448 1669Summer Traffic 1160 1217 1178 1213 1312Yearly Traffic 1097 1153 1121 1150 1229Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.1 0.8 0.2 0.3Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.3 0.5
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LPPCACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LPPCNORTH 151 23.0%2014 LPPCWEST 117 17.8%2014 LPPCNXUPP 116 17.7%2014 LPPCCEU 62 9.5%2014 LPPCSOUTH 51 7.8%2014 LPPCCEN 38 5.9%
0
100
200
300
400
500
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Lisbon ACC en-route delays in 2014
Lisbon LPPC ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 6.8% B: 5.1% L: 3.7%
No significant impact
+6.9% 0.53 0.16 Summer
+8.2% 0.29 0.21 Yes 94 (+7%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 44
ROMANIA BUCHAREST ACC 43.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route ATFM delay per flight remained at zero in Summer 2014, the same as in Summer 2013.
Capacity Plan 0% Achieved Comments ATS route network and sectorisation improvements Yes Maximum configuration: 20 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. It was calculated with NEVAC, giving the potential capacity of the ACC. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 144 flights and the peak 3 hour demand was 133.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 1874 1945 1982 2057 2362Summer Traffic 1520 1588 1566 1676 1975Yearly Traffic 1284 1333 1308 1383 1617Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LRBBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Bucharest LRBB ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 4.4% B: 2.7% L: 0.6%
No significant impact
+16.9% 0.00 0.00 Summer
+17.9% 0.00 0.00 No 183 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 45
SERBIA & MONTENEGRO BELGRADE ACC 44.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
En-route delay remained at zero in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan 0% Achieved Comments New sectorisation Yes FUA No Full regulatory framework still missing Maximum configuration: 10 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 165. The peak 1 hour demand was 145 and the peak 3 hour demand was 131 during the measurement period.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 2251 2464 2435 2441 2610Summer Traffic 1832 1870 1803 1792 1930Yearly Traffic 1459 1502 1435 1393 1491Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LYBAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Belgrade LYBA ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 4.3% B: 2.7% L: 1.2%
No significant impact
+7.0% 0.00 0.13 Summer
+7.7% 0.00 0.20 No 165 (+1%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 46
SLOVAK REPUBLIC BRATISLAVA ACC 45.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight increased to 0.2 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 63% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 15% for ATC Staffing, 10% for Airspace Management, 7% for Weather and 5% for Equipment (ATC). Capacity Plan 2% Achieved Comments Continuous improvements of the route network and sectorisation Yes
Optimisation of sector opening times Yes Improved flow and capacity management techniques Yes Continuous recruitment to increase staff level Yes Enhanced sectorisation according to the FABCE airspace plan Yes Mode S in Backup ATM System No Planned for Winter 2014 Maximum configuration: 5 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 119, 8% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 118 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 102.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 1461 1504 1553 1563 1924Summer Traffic 1183 1213 1217 1276 1419Yearly Traffic 974 1006 1004 1055 1161Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LZBBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Bratislava LZBB ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 3.9% B: 2.5% L: 0.5%
-16% +10.0% 0.14 0.19
Summer +11.2% 0.23 0.29 No 119 (+8%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 47
SLOVENIA LJUBLJANA ACC 46.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight remained zero in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan 5% Achieved Comments
New sector configurations and revised DFL Yes New DFLs were added and 5th sector implemented
Enhanced ATFCM techniques, including STAM Yes OTMVs defined, occupancy used Additional ATCOs will be recruited as necessary Yes Training for mixed licenses is ongoing. ATS route network and traffic organisation changes Yes DCTs H24 implemented in March 2014 Enhanced sectorization according to the FAB CE Airspace Plan, including FRA Yes Flexible sector configurations Yes
Mode S Ongoing New RDR being implemented, declaration of ModeS airspace expected by 2016.
System upgrades as necessary Yes Maximum configuration: 4/5 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS, representing the delivered capacity (87). The peak 1 hour demand was 78 and the peak 3 hour demand was 70 during the measurement period.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 1035 1189 1262 1254 1351Summer Traffic 830 912 909 890 962Yearly Traffic 673 741 735 703 743Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Enr
oute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LJLAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Ljubljana LJLA ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 0.8% B: -0.8% L: -2.4%
+25% +5.7% 0.00 0.22
Summer +8.0% 0.00 0.28 No 87 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 48
SPAIN BARCELONA ACC 47.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.67 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.55 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 71% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity and 28% for Weather. Capacity Plan: 2% Achieved Comments Minor ATC system upgrades Yes Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes Optimised sector configurations Yes Additional staff from TWR liberalization process Yes
SWFAB/FABEC Marseille interface, including LUMAS Partially
Improved airspace availability around D54 during 15 June – 15 Sept period Re-alignment with the projects related to the French-Spanish interface
SWFAB/FABEC Bordeaux interface Partially Re-alignment with the projects related to the French-Spanish interface
Safety nets On-going Maximum configuration: 11 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 144. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 144 and the peak 3 hour demand was 136.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 3071 3204 3138 3187 3333Summer Traffic 2475 2599 2523 2533 2599Yearly Traffic 2054 2138 2013 2007 2042Summer enroute delay (all causes) 2.7 1.9 0.8 0.7 0.6Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 1.8 1.3 0.6 0.5 0.4
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LECBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LECBP1U 134 17.5%2014 LECBCCC 115 15.1%2014 LEBLT1E 91 12.0%2014 LEBLF07 76 10.0%2014 LECBBAS 69 9.1%2014 LEBLXAL 61 7.9%
0
200
400
600
800
1000
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Barcelona ACC en-route delays in 2014
Barcelona LECB ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 1.9% B: 0.7% L: -4.9%
No significant impact
+1.8% 0.37 0.13 Summer
+2.6% 0.55 0.20 Yes 144 (+4%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 49
SPAIN CANARIAS ACC 48.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.14 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.39 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 77% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, and 19% for Weather. Capacity Plan: 0% Achieved Comments Optimised sector configurations Yes Improved ATFCM Yes Additional staff from TWR liberalization process Yes Minor ATC system upgrades Yes Safety nets On-going Maximum configuration: 9 (5 APP/3+1ENR) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 68. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 63 and the peak 3 hour demand was 56.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 1082 1145 1141 1066 1196Summer Traffic 739 792 715 688 746Yearly Traffic 753 814 749 724 774Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.7 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.4Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 1.2 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.4
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
GCCCACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 GCCCAAC 145 44.8%2014 GCCCRNE 52 16.0%2014 GCCCINB 50 15.6%2014 GCCCRC2 45 13.8%2014 GCCCRU6 11 3.3%2014 GCCCRE2 9 2.7%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Canarias ACC en-route delays in 2014
Canarias GCCC ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 13.2% B: 10.8% L: 8.7%
No significant impact
+6.9% 0.42 0.28 Summer
+8.5% 0.39 0.26 Yes 68 (+5%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 50
SPAIN MADRID ACC 49.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.25 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.09 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 48% of the delays were for the reason Other, 31% for ATC Capacity, and 16% for Equipment. Capacity Plan: 1% Achieved Comments Optimised sector configurations Yes Improved ATFCM Yes Minor ATC system upgrades Yes Additional staff from TWR liberalization process Yes Safety nets On-going Free route in SAN and ASI sectors (FRASAI) Yes Maximum configuration: 17 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 199. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 188 and the peak 3 hour demand was 175.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 3195 3139 2877 2794 2951Summer Traffic 2829 2887 2677 2578 2720Yearly Traffic 2651 2728 2500 2395 2514Summer enroute delay (all causes) 1.7 1.6 0.2 0.2 0.1Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 1.4 1.2 0.2 0.2 0.1
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LECMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 BEGAS 46 26.6%2014 LECMBLI 19 11.1%2014 LECMSAN 18 10.3%2014 LECMCTA 14 7.8%2014 LECMTLU 11 6.3%2014 LECMPAU 9 5.2%
0
100
200
300
400
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Madrid ACC en-route delays in 2014
Madrid LECM ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 3.7% B: 2.4% L: 1.0%
No significant impact
+5.0% 0.07 0.22 Summer
+5.5% 0.09 0.19 No 199 (+9%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 51
SPAIN PALMA ACC 50.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route delay per flight slightly decreased from 0.17 minutes in Summer 2013 to 0.15 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 98% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity. Capacity Plan: 1% Achieved Comments Optimised sector configurations Yes Improved ATFCM Yes Minor ATC system upgrades Yes Additional staff from TWR liberalization process Yes Safety nets On-going Maximum configuration: 7/8 (3/4 APP + 4 ENR) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/REVERSE CASA at 92. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 91, the peak 3 hour demand was 81.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 1513 1572 1527 1573 1651Summer Traffic 964 1035 1011 1009 1058Yearly Traffic 685 717 682 674 695Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LECPACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LECPMXX 62 79.2%2014 LECPIRX 7 8.3%2014 LECPIXX 5 5.8%2014 LECP12O 3 3.2%2014 LECPIAX 1 1.4%2014 LECPGMX 1 1.4%
0
20
40
60
80
100
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Palma ACC en-route delays in 2014
Palma LECP ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 0.5% B: -0.4% L: -1.5%
No significant impact
+3.1% 0.11 0.14 Summer
+4.8% 0.15 0.19 No 92 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 52
SPAIN SEVILLA ACC 51.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route delay decreased from 0.1 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan: 0% Achieved Comments Optimised sector configurations Yes Improved ATFCM Yes Potential additional staff from TWR liberalization process No Minor ATC system upgrades Yes Safety nets On-going Maximum configuration: 7 (5 ACC+2 APP) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 89. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 79 and the peak 3 hour demand was 69.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 1291 1301 1195 1190 1164Summer Traffic 1056 1087 984 986 998Yearly Traffic 978 1002 894 879 901Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LECSACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LECSSEV 10 44.8%2014 LECSNCS 4 16.8%2014 LECSCES 3 12.9%2014 LECSNOR 2 7.7%2014 LECSNO1 2 6.8%2014 LECSMA4 1 6.1%
0
10
20
30
40
50
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Seville ACC en-route delays in 2014
Sevilla LECS ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 5.8% B: 3.3% L: 2.3%
No sig. impact
+2.5% 0.03 0.29 Summer +1.2% 0.02 0.32 No 89 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 53
SWEDEN MALMO ACC 52.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan 1 % Achieved Comments Continuous improvements on the ATS route network Yes Optimizing the use of FRA when military areas are active Yes Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand Yes Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 11 sectors Yes Minor updates of COOPANS Yes Maximum configuration: 4/5 (E) + 3/4 (W) +2 (L) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be at the same level as in Summer 2014. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 120 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 109.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 1658 1732 1698 1713 1729Summer Traffic 1408 1498 1451 1488 1505Yearly Traffic 1296 1391 1359 1377 1386Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
ESMMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 ESMM2 5 51.8%2014 ESMM2W 2 21.2%2014 ESMM89 1 11.4%2014 ESMM67Y 1 5.6%2014 ESMMKL 0 3.3%2014 ESMM67 0 3.2%
0
1
2
3
4
5
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Malmo ACC en-route delays in 2014
Malmo ESMM ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 3.2% B: 1.1% L: -0.6%
+4% +0.6% 0.01 0.07
Summer +1.1% 0.01 0.10 No 124 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 54
SWEDEN STOCKHOLM ACC 53.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight slightly increased to 0.09 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 58% of the delays were for the reason Equipment (ATC) and 33% for Weather. Capacity Plan 1 % Achieved Comments Continuous improvements on the ATS route network Yes Optimizing the use of FRA when military areas are active Yes Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand Yes Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 11 sectors Yes Minor updates of COOPANS Yes Maximum configuration: 3 (M) + 4 (N) + 4 (S) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 82 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 75.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 1444 1485 1428 1451 1426Summer Traffic 1069 1133 1090 1113 1119Yearly Traffic 1021 1094 1062 1069 1078Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
ESOSACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 ESSATMA 18 31.8%2014 ESSAE 18 31.2%2014 ESSAW 12 21.7%2014 ESOS2 5 8.0%2014 ESSAS 2 2.8%2014 NILUG 1 2.4%
0
10
20
30
40
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Stockholm ACC en-route delays in 2014
Stockholm ESOS ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 2.9% B: 1.2% L: -0.2%
+4% +0.8% 0.05 0.00
Summer +0.6% 0.09 0.00 No 112 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 55
SWITZERLAND GENEVA ACC 54.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight remained at the same level as in 2013. 35% of delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 33% for ATC Staffing, 26% for Weather reasons and 6% due to ATC Equipment. Capacity Plan 2% Achieved Comments Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Yes Crystal – Traffic and complexity prediction tool Yes Stripless INI step 2 Yes Cross qualification of ATCOs (Upper/Lower) Yes Flight Plan adherence Yes Enhanced Mode S Yes Maximum configuration: 8/9 sectors (5/6 + 3) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline was measured using ACCESS at 151, which represents the capacity delivered during the Summer season in the ACC. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 144, and the peak 3 hour demand was 135.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 2086 2104 2072 2050 2145Summer Traffic 1832 1873 1848 1837 1876Yearly Traffic 1648 1704 1654 1627 1654Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LSAGACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LSAGSE 32 18.9%2014 LSAGL4 27 16.1%2014 LSAGL12 22 13.2%2014 LSAGL5 18 11.0%2014 LSAGN 18 10.7%2014 LSAGL34 15 9.0%
0
20
40
60
80
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Geveva ACC en-route delays in 2014
Geneva LSAG ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 0.8% B: -1.0% L: -1.9%
+4% +1.7% 0.10 0.13
Summer +2.1% 0.15 0.18 No 151 (+2%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 56
SWITZERLAND ZURICH ACC 55.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The average en-route delay per flight slightly decreased from 0.21 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.11 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 71% of delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 20% for Weather, 7% for ATC Equipment and 2% for ATC Staffing. Capacity Plan 1% Achieved Comments Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Yes Crystal – Traffic and complexity prediction tool Yes Stripless step 2 Yes Flight Plan adherence Yes Revised sector capacities following CAPAN study No CAPAN confirmed the existing capacities Enhanced Mode S Yes
Maximum configuration: 10 sectors No Maximum configuration: 9 sectors 10 sector configuration was not required
Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline was measured using ACCESS at 174. During the period June/July, the peak 1 hour demand was 165, and the peak 3 hour demand was 155.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 2543 2502 2504 2485 2499Summer Traffic 2262 2273 2249 2211 2241Yearly Traffic 2031 2078 2031 1975 1984Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LSAZACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LSAZM4 48 29.9%2014 LSAZM5 32 19.8%2014 LSAZM123 20 12.4%2014 LSZBTA 17 10.7%2014 LSZBAOR 16 10.2%2014 LSZHTMA 10 6.2%
0
50
100
150
200
250
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Zurich ACC en-route delays in 2014
Zurich LSAZ ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: -0.6% B: -2.0% L: -3.2%
+4% +0.5% 0.08 0.10
Summer +1.4% 0.11 0.16 No 174 (+2%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 57
TURKEY ANKARA /ISTANBUL ACC 56.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route delay per flight in Ankara ACC remained at 0.1 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 60% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity and 40% for the reason Other. Capacity Plan Achieved Comments Improved civil/military coordination Yes ATS route structure development Yes Additional controllers (45 per year for en-route) Yes
New Ankara ACC (Max 25 physical sectors + 5 optional) - Implementation of SMART system Ongoing
Provisional Site Acceptance Tests completed – Preparation for transition on-going
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 2336 2685 2445 2587 2995Summer Traffic 1981 2186 2193 2312 2626Yearly Traffic 1760 1914 1928 2037 2302Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LTAAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 2623 2865 2821 3000 3476Summer Traffic 2169 2375 2418 2613 2922Yearly Traffic 1842 2003 2050 2216 2477Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LTBBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Ankara LTAA ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons
ACC Reference Value
Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year
H: 8.2% B: 6.7% L: 4.8%
No sig. impact
Ankara: 13.0% Istanbul: 11.7%
Ankara: 0.12% Istanbul: 0.00% 0.13
Summer Ankara: +13.6% Istanbul: +11.8%
Ankara: 0.11% Istanbul: 0.00% 0.19 No Ankara: 227 (+51%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 58
Mode S Yes To be operational with SMART Maximum configuration: 20 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment Ankara: The capacity baseline of 161 was calculated with ACCESS, representing the capacity offered during the measured period. During the same period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 156 and the peak 3 hour demand was 141. A maximum configuration of 11 sectors was opened. Istanbul: The capacity baseline of 154 was calculated with ACCESS, representing the capacity offered during the measured period. During the same period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 147 and the peak 3 hour demand was 139. A maximum configuration of 3 sectors was opened. Izmir: The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the same period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 60 and the peak 3 hour demand was 53. A maximum configuration of 6 sectors was opened, including APP sectors.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 LTAASET 127 45.7%2014 NINVA 58 20.9%2014 LTAANOU 51 18.5%2014 LTAANOC 22 7.9%2014 LTAANOZ 13 4.7%2014 LTAAWEY 3 1.0%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Ankara ACC en-route delays in 2014
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 59
UKRAINE DNIPROPRETROVSK ACC 57.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route ATFM delay remained at zero, as in Summer 2013.
Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments
Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 objectives No
Implementation of FCM01 is partially implemented; the implementation of CPRs was temporally postponed (since April 2014) and then it was resumed. The related ATM system adjustments are in progress. Full implementation of FCM03 is conditioned by the terms of implementation of AMHS (ESSIP COM10)
ATFCM training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL No Training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL was suspended by UkSATSE since April 2014
Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development Yes
Maximum configuration: 4 sectors No
The area of responsibility of Dnipropetrovsk ACC was changed which lead to change of maximum configuration (6 sectors)
Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 54, 10% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 28 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 24.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 527 577 703 645 476Summer Traffic 443 488 522 540 200Yearly Traffic 382 422 446 467 233Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
UKDVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Dnipro-petrovsk UKDV ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 8.3% B: 6.4% L: 4.5%
No significant impact
-50.1% 0.00 0.19 Summer
-63.0% 0.00 0.29 No 54 (+10%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 60
UKRAINE KYIV ACC 58.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route ATFM delay remained at zero, as in Summer 2013.
Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development Yes
Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 objectives Yes
Full implementation of FCM03 is conditioned by the terms of implementation of AMHS (ESSIP COM10)
ATFCM training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL No
Training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL was suspended by UkSATSE since April 2014
Maximum configuration: 7 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 73, 1% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 58 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 50.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 789 876 1099 1004 945Summer Traffic 630 713 754 783 604Yearly Traffic 549 626 650 666 544Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
UKBVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Kyiv UKBV ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 7.6% B: 5.5% L: 4.0%
No significant impact
-18.2% 0.00 0.08 Summer
-22.8% 0.00 0.12 No 73 (+1%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 61
UKRAINE L’VIV ACC 59.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route ATFM delay remained at zero, as in Summer 2013.
Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development Yes
ATFCM training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL No
Training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL was suspended by UkSATSE since April 2014
Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 objectives
No
Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 (operational FSAs and CPRs) will be possible after the commencement of operations from the new ATM system. Full implementation of FCM03 is conditioned by the terms of implementation of AMHS (ESSIP COM10)
Installation of new ATM system (training and transition periods – from August to November 2014) No
The commencement of operations from the new ATM system was shifted to March 2015
Maximum configuration: 4 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. The peak 1 hour demand was 45 flights, and the peak 3 hour demand was 40 flights.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 644 721 757 796 697Summer Traffic 514 546 554 574 379Yearly Traffic 451 486 488 503 364Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
UKLVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
L’viv UKLV ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 5.0% B: 3.6% L: 2.1%
No significant impact
-27.7% 0.00 0.00 Summer
-34.0% 0.00 0.00 No 72 (0%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 62
UKRAINE ODESA ACC 60.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route ATFM delay remained at zero, as in Summer 2013.
Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development Yes
Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 objectives
No
Implementation of FCM01 is partially implemented; the implementation of CPRs was temporally postponed (since April 2014) and then it was resumed. Full implementation of FCM03 is conditioned by the terms of implementation of AMHS (ESSIP COM10)
ATFCM training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL No
Training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL was suspended by UkSATSE since April 2014
Maximum configuration: 3 sectors No
The area of responsibility of Odesa ACC was changed which lead to change of maximum configuration (5 sectors)
Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 61 in Summer 2014. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 33 flights and the the peak 3 hour demand was 28 flights.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 416 450 480 543 556Summer Traffic 307 324 332 387 361Yearly Traffic 250 266 272 302 287Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
UKOVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
Odesa UKOV ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013)
En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons
ACC Reference Value
Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 6.2% B: 3.7% L: 2.1%
+3%
-4.9% 0.00 0.00 Summer
-6.9% 0.00 0.00 No 61 (+3%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 63
UNITED KINGDOM LONDON ACC 61.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.12 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.07 minutes per flight in Summer 2014 (May to October inclusive). Capacity Plan: 4% Achieved Comments Traffic Management Improvements Yes Adaptation of sector configurations to demand Yes Flexible use of existing staff (including cross-sector training) more closely related to sector demand Yes Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes Complexity reduction and improved traffic presentation between sectors / ANSPs Yes Further benefits from the implementation of iFACTS (Nov 2011) Yes FAB dynamic sectorisation Trials Yes CPDLC Yes UK / Ireland FAB initiatives Yes Developing Queue Management programme Yes On-going recruitment to maintain agreed business service levels Yes Maximum configuration: 23 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity of 410 was calculated with ACCESS. During the period June/July, the peak hour demand was 410, the peak 3 hour demand was 371.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 6014 6180 6028 6040 6206Summer Traffic 5408 5499 5426 5534 5655Yearly Traffic 4800 4971 4894 4927 5033Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
EGTTACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 EGTT17LYD 73 28.1%2014 EGTT02LUE 28 10.6%2014 EGTTDVR 21 8.1%2014 EGTT01LUW 18 6.8%2014 EGTTNOR 10 4.0%2014 EGTTBCB 10 3.9%
0
100
200
300
400
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
London ACC en-route delays in 2014
London EGTT ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons
ACC Reference Value
Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 1.3% B: 0.4% L: -0.9%
No significant impact
+2.2% 0.05 0.14 Summer
+2.2% 0.07 0.24 No 410 (+3%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 64
UNITED KINGDOM LONDON TC 62.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan: 1% Achieved Comments Traffic Management Improvements Yes Adaptation of sector configurations to demand Yes Flexible use of existing staff Yes Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes Complexity reduction and improved traffic presentation between sectors / ANSPs Yes Developing Queue Management programme Yes Collaborative TMA developments No TC sector improvements No On-going recruitment to maintain agreed business service levels Yes Maximum configuration: 22 (14 ENR + 8 APP) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCES at 285, 3% higher that Summer 2013. During the period June/July, the peak hour demand was 282, the peak 3 hour demand was 254.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 4015 4133 4059 4071 4198Summer Traffic 3635 3680 3663 3714 3819Yearly Traffic 3318 3420 3386 3408 3512Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
EGTTTC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 EGTTLOR 17 35.1%2014 EGTTTMS 14 27.8%2014 LAM 10 21.1%2014 EGTTWEL 6 12.3%2014 EGTTOCKC 2 3.7% 0
10
20
30
40
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
London TMA TC en-route delays in 2014
London EGTT TC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 1.9% B: 1.3% L: -0.1%
No significant impact
+3.0% 0.01 0.11 Summer
+2.8% 0.02 0.14 No 285 (+3%)
Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 65
UNITED KINGDOM PRESTWICK ACC 63.
Traffic & Delay
2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan
The delay per flight remained at zero in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan: 1% Achieved Comments Traffic Management Improvements Yes Adaptation of sector configurations to demand Yes Flexible use of existing staff Yes Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes Complexity reduction and improved traffic presentation between sectors / ANSPs Yes FAB dynamic sectorisation Trials Yes CPDLC Yes UK / Ireland FAB initiatives Yes On-going recruitment to maintain agreed business service levels Yes
Maximum configuration: 26 sectors No
Maximum configuration: 25 sectors is sufficient for traffic demand following resectorisation
Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline of 225 was measured with ACCESS. During the period June/July, the peak 1 hour demand was 204, the peak 3 hour demand was 186.
Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 3267 3190 3080 3205 3079Summer Traffic 2694 2704 2621 2682 2657Yearly Traffic 2410 2452 2381 2398 2401Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Enro
ute
Del
ay (m
inut
es p
er fl
ight
)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
EGPXALL - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
YearReference Location
Avg Daily ER Delays
% of Total ACC ER Delay
2014 EGCCEE 24 57.0%2014 EGPXHUM 11 25.0%2014 EGPXCEN 6 13.3%2014 EGPXMOC 1 2.9%2014 EGCCIOM 1 1.6%2014 EGPXMOH 0 0.3%
0
10
20
30
40
CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg
daily
del
ay (m
in)
Scottish ACC en-route delays in 2014
Prestwick EGPX ACC
Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)
Capacity gap?
ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)
Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference
Value Current Routes
Shortest Routes
Year H: 0.1% B: -1.0% L: -2.1%
No significant impact
+0.2% 0.02 0.20 Summer
-0.9% 0.03 0.26 No 225 (0%)
NM Annual Network Operations Report 2014 Page 1
If you any questions on the content of this report or require further information on network performance reporting of the European ATM network, please contact us at: Operational Analysis & Reporting, Performance, Forecasts and Relations (PFR) Unit, Network Manager Directorate (NMD), EUROCONTROL, 96 Rue de la Fusée, B - 1130 Brussels Telephone: +32 (0)2 729 1155 Fax: +32 (0)2 729 9189 mailto:nm.ops.perf@eurocontrol.int http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/network-operations-monitoring-and-reporting
EUROCONTROL
June 2015 - © European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL)
This document is published by EUROCONTROL for information purposes. It may be copied in
whole or in part, provided that EUROCONTROL is mentioned as the source and it is not used for
commercial purposes (i.e. for financial gain). The information in this document may not be modified
without prior written permission from EUROCONTROL.
www.eurocontrol.int
Recommended