View
0
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
2015 Gorkha Earthquake, New Constitution and Local Resilience in Nepal
TrilochanPokharelDirector of Studies
Nepal Administrative Staff CollegeNepal
AchalaDahal1
Director of StudiesNepal Administrative Staff College
Nepal
49
IntroductionThisarticle isasummaryreviewofNepal’seffortstowards ‘resiliencesociety.’Whiledoingso,wewillkeepthe2015earthquakeinfocusandnavigatethroughthegeopoliti-calsituation, institutionalarrangements,policyresponsesandtherecentrestructuringofNepalwithnewformofgovernanceanddevolutionofauthoritytolocalgovernments,includingdisasterriskmanagement.Beingpronetomultipletypesofdisasterrisks,thecountryisworkingtowardsbuildingaresilientsocietythroughstrategiesofstrength-enedpreparednesscapacity,both institutionalandsocial,mitigationandpost-disasterrecoveryactivities.Infact,disasterismultidimensionalwithinwhichsocialfactorsareequallyimportanttoaddress(Fordham,Lovekamp,Thomas,&Phillips,2013).Inacon-text,thecountrythatisstrugglingtograduatefromleast-developedcountry(NationalPlanningCommission[NPC],2013),Nepal’s lessonsareworthnotingbyfor individualsandinstitutionsaroundtheworld,particularlythoseworkingtoimproveresiliency.
Thisarticle isorganizedtoprovidemacrooverviewofNepal’sgeophysical,polity,narrativesof2015Aprilearthquake (popularlyknownasGorkhaearthquake), recentpoliticalandadministrativerestructuringofthenationandroleoflocalgovernmentsinachievingthemuchcherishedgoalofresilientsociety.
Ⅰ. Nepal’s Geopolitical SituationAsanemergingnation-stateoftheSouthAsia,Nepalliesinactiveseismicbeltandis
2015 Gorkha Earthquake, New Constitution
and Local Resilience in Nepal
Abstract Buildingaresilientstate isamuch-desiredgoalofanynationalgovernment.Nepalhasenacteda2018policyondisasterriskreductionandmanagement(DRRM)comple-mentingthe2015ConstitutionofNepal,whichprovidedthe legalbasesforthe institu-tionalizedefforts to improvestatecapacityandservethecitizen,particularlyonthisconcern.Thesehavetwo-prongedstrategies: strengtheningnationalcapacityandem-powering citizens throughbothdirect and indirectmeasures onDRRM.The2015Gorkhaearthquakebeingthemostdevastatingofrecent timehas leftmanyscarsonpeople’s lives.Meanwhile, thestatehasanopportunitytoassess itsshortcomingsandimprove itsperformanceso that thepeoplewouldnotbedisastervictimsagain.Anemergingnation-state thatwitnesseddecadesofpolitical turmoil, internalconflictandpoorpublicsectorperformance,Nepalhastoworkhardertobuildresiliency.The2015ConstitutionofNepalhasassignedtheexerciseofstatepoweramongfederal,provincialandlocalgovernments.Thelocalgovernmentshavereceivedanexclusivestatusofau-tonomousgovernmentwithmajorresponsibilitytoprovideuninterruptedservicestothecitizens, includingDRRM.Thepromiseofresilientsocietynowlargelydependsonthefunctioningoflocalgovernmentsandstateeffortstostrengthentheircapacity.
50 Nepal
pronetoseveralotheranthropogenichazards.Thelatestearthquakeof7.6magnitudein25April2015andsubsequentaftershocks, thatclaimedalmost9000 livesandcosthugeeconomic losses isarecentexample.Nepal ispopularlyrecognizedintheworldbythetallestpeak,themesmerizingbeautyknownas ‘MountEverest’.Underneathitaretwocollidingtectonicplates;youngmountains(Khrul,Adhikari,&Dorka,2018);ac-tivefaultline,andthousandsofriversandrivulets(Dhital,2015)thatkeepthiscountryonhazardouszone.
NepalissituatedinmiddleoftheHinduKushHimalayanrange.Ithasdiversegeog-raphy. Inanorth-southstretchofabout200kilometer, threedistinctgeographiesarerecorded (Figure1).Thenorthernpart issparselypopulatedmountainousareawithsnow-coveredpeakshousingeightofthetenworld’stallestpeaks.Themiddlepartisahillyareaandis largelypopulatedandarable.Thehillsserveasmajoreconomiccen-tersandusedtoholdthelargestproportionofpopulationsomedecadesago.Thesouth-ernpart isplain land,holding thehighestproportionofpopulation.Economically, itservesasthefoodbanktoentirecountry.Nepalborderswithtwogiants, intermsofgeography,economyanddemography:ChinainthenorthandIndiaintheeast,southandwest.Thedeepinterconnectionwiththesetwoneighborsineconomy,socialvalues,cultureandpoliticalaffairs,hassomeimpactsonnationalaffairs.
Source:Retrievedfromhttp://creativenepal.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/nepal-map.jpg,accessedon15March2019
Figure 1:GeographicalZonesofNepal
A landmassof147,181squarekilometers,Nepal, isresidenceof26.5millionpeople(Nepal2011census).Withanaverageannualgrowthrateof1.35percent,thepopulationofNepalisprojectedtobe30.4millionby2021andto33.6millionby2031.Thepopula-tionissparselydistributedthroughoutthecountrywithanaverageof180peoplepersquarekilometerinarangeof3to4416(CentralBureauofStatistics[CBS],2014).The
Nepal 51
countryisalsoanexampleofrichsocial-culturalandethnicdiversity,arecordedhomeofover125caste/ethnicgroups.Eachcaste/ethnicgrouprepresentsdifferentsocio-eco-nomicstatus,residentialpattern,choiceofoccupationandawarenessaboutriskprofile.Therecent2015ConstitutionofNepalpavedthewayforbothpoliticalandadministra-tiverestructuringofthecountry,thatimpactsonNepal’sgovernancesystem,includingdisasterriskmanagement.Thiswillbediscussedinthelatersection.
Ⅱ. Disaster Risk ProfileThecountryhasuniquedisasterriskvulnerability,withnumeroushazardspresentthroughoutthecountry.Table1isasummaryofkeyhazardsasidentifiedbytheMin-istryofHomeAffairs,theleadministryindealingwithdisasterriskreductioninNepal.Thehazardsarecombinationofanthropogenic factorsandoperateseparatelyor incombination.Thesocio-economicprofileofparticularareaaddsvulnerabilityindisasterrisk.Excludingthe2015earthquake,Nepalrecordsanaverageofover300deathsandpropertylossofover10milliondollarseachyear(MinistryofHomeAffairs[MoHA]&DiasterPreparednessNetwork-Nepal[DPNet-Nepal],2015).
RecordsshowthatNepalhaswitnessedmajorearthquakewaves incertain inter-vals,claiminglivesofthousandsofpeopleandhugecostinlossofproperties.ThefirstrecordedearthquakeinNepaldatesbackto7June1255withamagnitudeof7.7.Seriesoftremorswereobservedthereafter(NSET,2012).In1934,anearthquakestruckwithamagnitudeof8.1andanepicenterattheEasternpart(sixmilessouthoftheMountEv-erest)ofNepalandatBihar,northernstateofIndia,claiminglivesofmorethan12,000combined(Gunn,2008).Afewmediumsizedearthquakeswererecordedinbetween-6.0Min1966,6.5Min1980and6.6Min1988(Dhakal,2016).The2015Gorkhaearthquakeisthelatestintheseries.
Table 1:RiskProfileofNepal,2017
Typeofhazard Nature Location Reasonsofvulnerability
Landslides Recurrent ThehillydistrictsofNepallo-cated in the Siwalik, Ma-habharat range (east-westlowerhillrange),mid-land,andalso foreandhigherHimala-yas
Bothnaturalandhumanfac-tors such as steep slopes,fragilegeology,highintensityof rainfall, deforestation,un-plannedhumansettlements
Floods Mostcommon RiverbasinlikeKoshi(easternNepal),Narayani(central),Kar-nali (mid-western),Mahakali(far-western) riversperennialrivers
Anthropogenicactivities likeimproper landuse,encroach-ment into vulnerable landslopesandunplanneddevel-opment activities such asconstructionofroadsandirri-gationcanalswithoutproperprotectionmeasures in thevulnerablemountainbeltandclimatechange
52 Nepal
Glacier lakesoutburst floods(GLOFs)
Occasional Highaltitudeareasparticular-lyinthefoothillofmountain
Damminginbymoraines,thelakescontainedhugevolumesofwatermelting of glaciermay lead to outbreak thelakes
Earthquake Occasional Major active faults in east-westalignment, entireNepalwhich lies in active seismiczone
Siwalik, lesserHimalayaandfrontalpartoftheHigherHi-malaya
Fire Recurrent Midhillareas 78% agro-base households,cluster based house moresusceptibletocatchingfire,indryseasonwildorforestfire
Drought Recurrent SomepartsofTerai,mid-landandTrans-HimalayanbeltsofNepal
Mostlycausedbyunevenandirregular lowmonsoon rain-fallandmoreoverthelackofirrigationfacilitiesfurtherex-a ce rba t e s the e f f e c t o fdrought causing enormouslossofcropsproductionlead-ingtotheshortageand inse-curityfood
Avalanche Occasional Highmountainousregionhav-ing the rugged and steepslopestopographically
Slopes, thicknessof snoworhumanactivitywithcumulat-eddebrisinthesnowline.
Source:MoHA(2017)
Exceptforearthquakes,thereisseasonalcalendarofhazardsinNepal.Thefloods,thunderboltsandlandslidesareprevalentduringthemonsoonseason;whilecoldwavesandavalanchestakeplacemoreofteninwinter;firesandheatwavestaketollsinsum-mer.Healthhazardsaremoreprevalentincommunitieswithpooraccesstohealthfa-cilitiesandbackwardsocio-economicstatus.Nevertheless,theentirecountryexperienc-esat leastsomeformsofdisasterthroughouttheyear.TheMoHA(2017)recordsfor2015and2016include2,940disastereventswithatollof9698deaths,281missingand23,317 injuredpersons.The former includesdeaths from2015Gorkhaearthquake.Thesedisastersalsohaveincalculableeconomicandsocialloss,adverselyaffectingthelivesofpeople.
Ⅲ. The 2015 Gorkha EarthquakeIn2015,Nepalwitnessedtwomajorevents–theGorkhaearthquakeandthenewCon-stitution.Thesetwoevents,althoughnotcorrelatedinanyway,havefarreachingim-pactsinNepal’sdisastergovernancesystem.The2015GorkhaearthquakecameatthetimeNepalwasintheprocessofpromulgatinganewConstitutionthroughpeopleelect-edConstituentAssembly.TheConstituentAssemblywasanoutcomeoflongbattlebe-tweenthestateandtherebels ina ‘war’ thattook livesofalmost17000people.Theconflicthadpushedthecountryintoafragile,unstableandeconomicallyweakcountry.
Nepal 53
Nepal’simageintheworldpoliticalandsocialmapwasacountrywithveryhighpoliti-calvulnerabilitycompoundedwithhighdisastervulnerability.
The2015earthquakeprovidestwomajor frameworkstoevaluateNepal’sdisastergovernance.First, thisprovidesanassessmentof thecountry’sreadiness toconfrontsuchhugeshocks,e.g.,capacity assessment.Thisalsoaddsvaluetoexistingknowledgebybringingperspectivesonthecountrysurvivedsuchlarge-scaledisaster.Second,inusingthelessonslearnedfromthiscostlyexperience,Nepalmaybeabletostrengthen its system.Will this learning fit intoNepal’spolicyprocessanddisastergovernance?The2015aftermathalsogaveopportunityforreengineeringNepal’ssettlementpattern,understandingaboutsocialdynamicsandencouragingcitizento livesafer lives inawaythatisinharmonywiththeircultureandgeography.
In thisarticle,wewillassess thenarrativesaroundthe2015Gorkhaearthquake,providesummaryofdamagesandofkeyaspectsofreconstructiondone,withtheendinviewofdrawingsomelessonsinbuildingresiliency.Thepaperwillalsodiscusstheprocessofpromulgatingthe2015Constitutionanditsrelationtopost-disasterrecoverypolicies,aswellastheinstitutionalarrangementsandrolesoflocalgovernmentsinim-provingdisastergovernanceinNepal.
At least forthecurrentgeneration,mid-dayofSaturday25April2015remainsasoneof thekeyeventsthat theyhaveadded intheir timeline.Thecountrytrembledwithaforceof7.6magnitudes,puttingeveryoneintochaos,uncertaintyandbewilderedterror.Perhaps, for theNepalisociety, thatdaycouldbeknownastheexceptionallymostterrifyingdayinthepasthalfofthecentury.Increasingaccesstopublicinforma-tionandgovernmentandotherorganization’seffortstoincreaseawarenessofcitizensondisasterrisk,havemadetheNepalisocietymoreawareofpotentialdisasterrisks.Amidst fear,partialknowledgeandgovernment’sminimaleffortsto improvedisasterpreparedness,on25April2015apowerfulearthquakeof7.6magnitudewithepicenteratBarpak,Gorkhadistrict,76kilometersnorthwestofKathmanduandamajorafter-shockof6.8magnitudeson12May2015withitsepicenteratDolakhadistrict,85kilo-metersnortheastofKathmanduoccurred.TheincidentsdestabilizedsociallivesleavinglongstandingquestionsforNepalistateandsociety,onthestate’sabilitytobuildresil-ientsociety.
Table2summarizesthedamageofthe2015Gorkhaearthquake.Theaftermathtookalmost9000 livesand leftaround22,000people injured.At leastone-thirdofthetotalpopulationwasaffectedinsomeway.Itfullyorpartiallydamagednearlyamillionpri-vatehousesfrom31of77districts.TheGovernmentdeclared14severelyaffectedand17partiallyaffecteddistricts.ThePostDisasterNeedsAssessment(PDNA)conductedbyNationalPlanningCommission following theaftermathestimated the impactoneightmillionpeople.ThePDNAfurtherassertedalossof$7.065billionin18sub-sectorsoutof foursectors-social,productive, infrastructureandcrosscutting.Of them,socialsector includingprivatehousing,humansettlement,healthandeducation infrastruc-
54 Nepal
turesandculturalheritagealoneaccounted58percentofthetotalloss(NationalPlan-ningCommission[NPC],2015).
Table 2:EconomicLossbySectors
S.N. Sectors % of total % within sector
A Social Sectors 57.84 100.00
1 HousingandhumanSettle-ments 49.62 85.79
2 Health 1.07 1.85
3 Education 4.43 7.66
4 Culturalheritage 2.72 4.70
B Productive Sectors 25.21 100.00
5 Agriculture 4.02 15.93
6 Irrigation 0.05 0.22
7 Commerce 2.40 9.52
8 Industry 2.73 10.82
9 Tourism 11.50 45.61
10 Finance 4.52 17.91
C Infrastructure Sectors 9.45 100.00
11 Electricity 3.01 31.81
12 Communications 1.23 13.02
13 CommunityInfrastructure 0.47 5.01
14 Transport 3.13 33.12
15 WaterandSanitation 1.61 17.04
D Cross-Cutting Issues 7.49 100.00
16 Governance 2.66 35.44
17 Disasterriskreduction 0.02 0.29
18 EnvironmentandForestry 4.82 64.27
Total 100.00 100.00
Total(NPRmillion) 706,461
Total(US$million) $7,065
Source:NationalPlanningCommission[NPC](2015)
Theseestimateswereusedinpreparingpost-disasterrecoveryplansandsourcingsupportfromtheinternationalcommunityto‘buildbackbetter’theNepalisociety.ThePDNAreportsrecognizesocialaspects’vulnerabilitybutcouldnotdomuchtoaccount
Nepal 55
forlosses.Thereportsstate‘thedisasteralsohighlightedaspectsofinequitiesinNepalisocietyspanninggeography,incomeandgender.Poorerruralareashavebeenmoread-verselyaffectedthantownsandcitiesduetothe inferiorqualityof theirhouses (Na-tionalPlanningCommission[NPC],2015)’.Factoringinsocialaspectsindamagewouldgiveadifferentscenario,although it ismathematicallydifficult toestimate.Neverthe-less, theresilientcharacteristicsof theNepalisocietywere fullyappreciatedandad-mired,leadingtothesuccessfulcompletionofearlyrescueandrelief,despitesomemi-norweaknesses.
Ⅳ. Political Perils around 2015 Gorkha EarthquakeAsNepalweretofullyfocusonreducingthedamageandnegativeeffectsofthe2015earthquake,thepoliticalnegotiationstodraftthenewconstitutionwererife(Pokharel,etal.,2018).Thepoliticalpartiesweredividedinunderstandingandadvocatingpropos-als tobe included intheConstitution.Thesystemof thecoalitiongovernmentwasa‘newnormal’andthepoliticalprocesswasbasicallyconfinedtonegotiationsonpowersharingandholdingportfolios.Thedemiseofthefirstconstituentassemblyin2012,af-terfouryearsofdismalexistenceandwithoutdeliveringanyoutput,e.g.,anewconsti-tution,hadfurtherheightenedthepoliticalturmoil.Peoplewereskepticalonthecapaci-tyandintentofthegovernmenttoputagovernancesystemontrackanddealwiththemassivedestruction.Frequentchangesofgovernmentsinthepasttwodecades(beforethequake),havedestabilizedthestatemachineriesandingrainedacultureofdistrustontheireffectivefunctioning(Bhandari,2014).
Theelectionoftheconstituentassemblywasaresultof2006ComprehensivePeaceAccord(CPA)betweenthestateandrebelswhofoughtforstatetransformationforal-mostadecade.FollowingtheCPA,thecountrystartedmovingtowardsinstitutionaliz-ingthepeaceprocessanddraftnewconstitutionthroughconstituentassembly.Thepo-liticalpartiespaidmoreattention inechoing theirpolitical interests thanbringingimprovementsinthedeliverycapacityofthestate.
For longNepalwasportrayedasacountryof instability,conflictandpoorgover-nance (Kaufman,Kraay,&Mastruzzi,2009).Thecountrywasprogressingamidst lowperformingpublicinstitutions,governmentinstitutionsconfinedwithincitycentersandsomeminimallyaccessibletotheruralareas.Forpeoplelivinginfar-flungareas,accesstogovernmentwasanightmare.Localgovernment institutionswerealmostdysfunc-tionalinabsenceofelectedrepresentativesofpeople,foralmosttwodecades(Pokharel,etal.,2018).Thiscreatedanobstacleinechoingcitizenvoicesinpublicgovernance.
TheformationofthesecondConstituentAssembly (CA) in2013gavehopetociti-zensthattheCAwoulddeliveraconstitutionand leadthecountrytowardsstability.ThecoalitiongovernmentformedinFebruary2014fromtwomajorpoliticalpartieshadamajormandatetoformulateaconstitutionadheringtothecitizen’sdemandfor‘ajustandinclusivestate’.However,thefragilecoalitionwasrepletewithtensions,differencesanddiverseadvocaciestoproposeintheconstitution.Fullyoccupiedwithpoliticaldis-
56 Nepal
courses,thegovernmentwasnotadequatelypreparedforothertypesofdisastersuchasnaturaldisastersandearthquakes.Assuch,acomprehensivepre-plantodealwithmegacatastropheswasnotinplace.Atendencytopoliticizeanyeventandseekoppor-tunity forpoliticalcalculationwasverticallydistributedacrossthecountry (TheAsiaFoundation,2011).Thepoliticalmaneuveringresultedina‘cheaplyconstituted’NationalReconstructionAuthority (NRA),amuchhypedand ‘minimumcondition institutionofdonorcommunity’todealwiththeentireprocessofpost-earthquakereconstruction.
Thepoliticalnegotiationwasso intensethat theNRAwasconstitutedtwice.Thegovernmentmadethe firstattempt inAugust2015throughanordinancewhichwasdissolvedshortlyafterthegovernmentfailedtoforwardsuchordinancetotheparlia-ment,owingtolackofpoliticalconsensus.Followingtheformationofthenewgovern-ment,thegovernmentformedtheNRAon25December2015,eightmonthsafterthedevastatingearthquake.The turnoverof fourChiefExecutiveOfficers in less thanthreeyearsofNRA’s formation indicatesthattheproblemofdisastermitigationandmanagementhasbecomeapoliticalplaygroundandminefield.
Nevertheless,thedisasterplayedasacatalysttobringalldisgruntlingpoliticalpar-tiestogethertocomprise.Amidstpublicpressureandpoliticaltension,theConstituentAssemblypromulgatedtheConstitutionofNepalwrittenbytherepresentativeofciti-zenson20September2015.Thiswassupposedtoendaneraofinstabilityanduncer-tainty.However,ittooktimeforestablishinginstitutionsasprovisionedintheconstitu-tion.Thestate thenconcentrated itsstrengthon implementationofconstitutionandformationofnewinstitutionsthroughelections furtherunderminedthe functioningofNRA.
Ⅴ. Pre 2015 Gorkha Earthquake Institutional ArrangementClassically,disasterswereconsideredastheresultofdivinepowerandwereaddressedinsameapproach.Thedisastermanagementwasmainlydrivenbycharityapproach.Thestateemphasizedonrescueandreliefactivitiesandlessemphasizedonprepared-nessandmitigation. Inshort, therewasabsenceofholisticapproachofdisasterriskmanagement.Althoughnotveryeffective,Nepalhasmadeseverallegalandinstitution-alframeworkstodealwithdisasters(Table3).Thissectionbrieflysummarizeskeyle-galandpolicyinstrumentsandinstitutionalarrangementthatNepalhadadoptedbefore2015Gorkhaearthquake.Thepost-disasterinstitutionalframeworkisdiscussedinsub-sequentsection.
Natural Calamity (Relief) Act 1982TheNaturalCalamity (Relief)Act1982wasthe first formal legal instrumentenactedwithanobectiveto‘makearrangementfortheoperationofreliefworkandthemainte-nanceofpeopleconveniencewithaviewtoprotectthelifeandpropertyofthepeopleingeneral andpublicproperty’ (NepalLawCommission, 1982).With the focusonpost-disasterreliefmanagement,theActhasprovisioneda25-memberCentralDisasterReliefCommitteeundertheleadershipoftheMinisterforHomeAffairsanddescribes
Nepal 57
thedetailfunctionsofthecommitteeinrelationtonaturaldisaster.Itallowedthegov-ernmenttoconstitutedisasterreliefcommitteeatregional,district,andlocallevel.TheActprovidedauthoritytosetupnaturaldisasterrelief fundsatthecentral,regional,district,andlocallevelsbyauthorizingtherespectivecommitteestousesuchfundsinreliefoperations.ThisActwastheonlylegalinstrumenttodealwithdisastersuntilre-placedbyDisasterRiskandManagementAct2017.AsthisActwasenactedto im-proverescueandrelief, thepreparednessandotheraspectsofdisasterriskmanage-mentwerenotadequatelyaddressed.
National Action Plan for Disaster Management (1996)InlightoftheInternationalDecadeforNaturalDisasterReduction(IDNDR,1990-1999)andtheYokohamaStrategy(1994)andtheneedtotranslatethecommitmentsintoac-tion,anationalplanfordisastermanagementwasdevelopedin1996.Thisactionplanmappedthedisasterriskmanagmenetcapacityofthecountryandmainstreameddisas-terriskmanagementparticularlyintheeducationsector.Italsodefinedtherolesandresponsibilitiesofkeyactorsinriskmanagmeentandprioritisedactivitiesdesignedtoincreasetheresilienceofcommunitiesanddecreasetherisks.
Table 3:MajorPolicyFrameworksinPre-2015Earthquake
Year Policy/Strategy/Guideline
1982 NaturalCalamity(Relief)Act
1992 Inter-AgencyStandingCommittee
1996 NationalActionPlanforDisasterManagement
1998 LocalSelf-GovernanceAct
2002-2007 Tenthfive-yeardevelopmentplan
2003 DisInventardatabasesystem
2005 Water-InducedDisasterManagementPolicy
2005 DisasterRescueandReliefStandard
2005 PrimeMinister’sNaturalDisasterReliefFund
2007 DisasterManagementAct(proposed)
2008/10, 2011/13,2014/16 Three-YearPeriodicPlans
2009 NationalStrategyforDisasterRiskManagement
2009 NationalPlatformonDisasterRiskReduction
2009 Multi-SectoralInitialRapidAssessment
2010 NationalEarlyWarningStrategy
2010 DRRandCRMfocalpoints
2010 DistrictDisasterManagementPlan
58 Nepal
2010 NationalAdaptationProgrammeofAction
2011 NepalRiskReductionConsortium
2011 DisasterPreparednessandResponsePlan
2011 LocalDisasterRiskManagementPlanningGuidelines
2011 ClimateChangePolicy
2011 EmergencyOperationCentre
2012 NationalLandUsePolicy
2013 NationalDisasterResponseFramework
2013 EnvironmentallyFriendlyLocalGovernanceFramework
2013 NationalMonitoringandEvaluationGuidelines
2013 DisasterRecoveryFramework
2013 NationalAdaptationProgramme
2013 DeadBodyManagementGuideline
Local Self Governance Act, 1999TheActdecentralizedriskmanagmenet issuesbydelegatingmoreauthorityandre-sponsibility to localbodies for thedesignand implementationof local-levelplansandprograms.Itemphaziedonthedevelopmentactivities,includinginfrastructuredevelop-ment,whichcouldmanagenaturalcalamitiesandlessenrelatedlossoflifeandproper-ty,but its focuswasnotreallyonthedisasterriskmanagement.Asprovided intheAct,around600disastermanagementcommitteeswereformedatthelcoallevels.Dias-terriskmanagmenetwere linkedwithdistrictdisasterreliefcommittees (DDRCs) topromotetheeffectivenessoftechnical,financialandotheraspectsofcoordination.
Periodic PlansNepalstartedplanneddevelopmentfrom1956withthedisclosureoffirstfiveyearplan.Thedisaserriskmanagementgotexclusiveattentiononlyin2002.Thetenthfiveyearplan(2002-2007)managedtoallocateaseparatechaptertodisastermanagement.Theplanacknowledgedthatdisasterriskmanagmenetiskeytoensuringsustainabledevel-opment,publicsafety,andtheeffectivemanagementofnaturalresourcesandhuman-in-duceddisasters.Theplancalled forprogrammessuchaspilotingGISmapsandhaz-ard-and-vulnerabilityassessmentsandforformulatingasectorplanondisasters.Italsorecognizesthelinkbetweendisasterreductionandtheenvironment.
Thetwothreeyearplans2007/08-2009/10and2009/10-2012/13continuedtogivedueconsiderationtodisasterriskmanagement.Theplansemphasizedonpolicyformu-lation,strengtheninginstitutionalmechanism,introduceearlywarningsysteminmajorriversacrossthecountry; fostercoordinatedapproachfordisasterriskreductionandlinkingdisastermanagementwithclimatechange,amongothers.
Nepal 59
National Strategy for Disaster Risk Management (NSDRM) 2009TheNSDRMunderscoredthatunlessdisasterriskmanagement ismainstreamedintodevelopmentactivities,thepeopleandstatewillcontinueexperienceoflossofphysicalproperty,humanlives,andbasicinfrastructures.Theframeworkproposedtostrength-enMoHA’sroleas the focalagency fordisasterriskmanagement. If furtherrecom-mendedestablishinganationaldisasterpreparednessagency,settingupanationwideearlywarningsystem,andinvestinginweatherforecastingcapacities,buttheprogresswasfarbelowthetargetssetintheactionplan.
TheframeworkhadadoptedthreemajorstrategicobjectivesandfiveprioritiesofactionassetbyHyogoframeworkofaction.Theframeworkoutlined29strategicactiv-itiesunder fiveprioritiesofaction.Thestrategies includedwereagricultureandfoodsecurity,health,education,shelter,infrastructureandphysicalplanning,livelihoodpro-tection,waterandsanitation, information,communication,coordinationand logistics,search and rescue, anddamageandneeds assessment (Ministry ofHomeAffairs[MoHA],2009).
Disaster Preparedness and Response Plans (DPRP), 2011ThegovernmentformulatedDPRPsinall75districtstoboostriskmanagementanden-hanceemergencyresponseandrelief for local-levelresilience,milestones initiatives.Basedontheseplansthe localbodieswerealsoencouragedtoprepare localdisasterriskmanagementtoaddresstheirownlocalneeds.TheMoHAhadconductedannualpre-monsoonworkshopsatthenational,regionalanddistrictlevelsfrom2011tomakestakeholdersawareofdisasterpreparednessandresponseandfacilitatethemtoimple-mentDPRPs.Inabsenceofstrongvigilanceandmonitoring,theactualoutputtheplanscouldnotbeaccountedwhether,itmadeasignificantmovetowardsbuildingresiliency.
National Disaster Response Framework (NDRF), 2013TheMoHApreparedNDRFoutliningtherolesandmandatesofallgovernmentandnon-governmentstakeholderstorespondtodisaster.TheNDRFconnectedallrelevantstakeholders inaplatformtocompliment inallphasesofdisastermanagementcycle.Becauseitwasakindofstandardoperatingprocedures(SOP)mechanism,iteasedtheprocessofcoordinatinghumanitarianagenciesduringemergencyresponse incaseofmegadisaster.Thisefforthadawakenedanintegratedplatformagainstdisastereventsand forrapidresponseandrecovery.TheNDRFstrengthened institutionalcapacityandputinplacecollectiveandcoherenteffortstosystematizethedisasterresponse.
Ⅵ. Institutional MechanismMinistry of Home AffairsMinistryofHomeAffairs(MoHA)actsasnationalfocalagencyondisastermanagementand leadagencyresponsible for implementationof theNaturalCalamity (Relief)Act,1982.TheMoHAisalsoresponsibleforrescueandreliefwork,datacollectionanddis-semination,aswellascollectionanddistributionoffundsandresources.Theassignedtaskhasbeenimplementedthroughdisastermanagementdivisionwithintheministry
60 Nepal
andnationalemergencyoperationcenteranditsdistrictleveloffices.
Central Disaster Relief Committee (CDRC)AccordingtoNaturalCalamity (Relief)Act,1982, thegovernmenthasconstitutedtheCentralDisasterReliefCommitteeundertheleadershipoftheministerforhomeaffairs.Thecommitteeisresponsibletoformulateandimplementthepoliciesandprogramsre-latingtothenaturaldisasterreliefworkandtoundertakeothernecessarymeasuresthereof.Moreover,theCentralCommitteepreparesspecificnormsofreliefassistancetothedisastervictims.
Regional Disaster Relief Committee (RDRC)2
Regionalcommitteesusedtoworkassubsidiaryarmofcentralcommittee. Itwasre-sponsible for formulationof regional levelpolicyonnaturaldisasterreliefworkandpreparationof theprogress,coordinateorcause tocoordinatebetweensub-regionalcommitteesonreliefworkandforwardinformationtothecentralcommittee.
District Disaster Relief Committee (DDRC)Intheerstwhilesystem,theDDRCwasthemostfunctionalunitfordisasterriskman-agementatsub-national level.Thesecommitteeshave functionsandduties tocoordi-nateorcausetocoordinatebetweenlocalcommitteesinreliefwork,formulatedistrictlevelplans,monitorreliefworkoflocalcommitteesandsupporttheon-goingwork,for-ward informationandwork inaccordancewiththedirectivesofhigher levelcommit-tees.TheChiefDistrictOfficerwasmaderesponsibleforoverseeingactivitiesrelatedtodisaster,basicallythepost-disasterrescueandreliefactivities.
Local Disaster Relief Committee (LDRC)Atmunicipallevel,theLDRCshadfunctionsanddutiestopreparedetaileddescriptionoftheloss,organizevolunteer’steams,makenecessaryarrangementstoprovidemedi-calaccess,makearrangements for theevacuationof thevictims,distributethereliefpackages,conductawarenessprogrammesasaprecautionforthepreventionandcon-trolofthepossibleeventsofthenaturaldisaster.However,becauseoflimitedcapacityandabsenceof technicalknowledge the functioningof thesecommitteesarealwaysquestioned.
Disaster Units in Security ForcesThethreesecurityforces―NepalArmy,ArmedPoliceForceandNepalPolicehaddi-sasterunitsandsquadswithintheirstructure.Theseunitsusedtofunctionincoordina-tionwithcommitteesatvariouslevels.Forrescueandreliefactivities,theseunitscomeintoforefrontandtakelead.
Inaddition, thegovernmentagreedonclusterapproachand identified11clustersbytheNDRF2013andassignedclustersleadandco-lead.Thegovernmenttookinallclusterswhilethehumanitarianagenciessecondedasco-lead.Thisapproachprovedtobeinstrumentaltocoordinateamongtheinstitutionsworkingindisasterriskmanage-
Nepal 61
ment.Frequentbutsmall-scaledisastershavecontinuouslyencouragedthegovernmentandotherpartnerstoprepareforresilientsocietyandconcentrateitseffortsinimprov-inginstitutionaldisastergovernance.Inabsenceofintensivesimulationandcontinuousengagement, lapseswerenoticedindisastergovernance.TheGorkhaearthquakepro-videdanopportunitytoassessNepal’sinstitutionalcapacitytodealwithdisasterrisks.
Ⅶ. The Grokha Earthquake and RecoveryThe National Reconstruction Authority (NRA) and reconstructionDespite tediousmulling, theNRAwasconstitutedon25December2015,aftereightmonthsofthedevastation.Atthetime,thepublicinstitutionswerelargelycriticizedfornotperformingandaloofofpublicinterest,therewasgreatskepticismonperformanceoftheNRA.TheNRAwasconstitutedwithaimto‘promptlycompletetheconstructionworkofstructuresdamagedinasustainable,resilientandplannedmanner,andtopro-motenationalinterestsandprovidesocialjusticebymakingresettlementandtransloca-tionof thepersonsand familiesdisplacedbytheearthquake’ (GovernmentofNepal,2015).TheNRAthenpreparedavisionofwell-plannedresilientsettlementandapros-peroussociety.
TheNRAwasanewpracticeinNepal.Consideringthescaleofdamageandworkofreconstructiontobeundertaken,anunderstandingbetweenthegovernmentandde-velopmentpartnerspavedwayforformationofdedicatedinstitutiontooverseeentireprocessofreconstruction.Astherescueandreliefwasmostlycompletedbefore, theNRAwasrequiredtofullyconcentrateonreconstructionofpublicandprivateproper-tiesandbriningcitizensbacktonormalcybutinsaferlivingarrangements.TheNRAsufferedtheimpactofpre-disasterpoliticaleconomyand‘influencednotonlybytheac-tionsofrelevantstakeholdersbutalsobybias,(in)justiceand(dis)advantagethatpre-vailedinpre-disastersetting(Pokharel,etal.,2018).
Therewasabighopeamongcitizensthatthereconstructionwouldexpeditealongwiththe formationof theNRA,but itremainedentangledwith institutionalarrange-ment,preparingstandardoperatingproceduresandengagingotherstakeholdersinthereconstructionprocess(Lord&Moktan,2017).Moreimportantwastoidentifyvictims,communicatethemthereconstructionprocessandbuildtheirconfidence.Thistooklon-gerperiodandwentthroughseveralcomplexitieslikeidentifyingactualnumberofvic-tims,theirsocio-economicdifficultiesandtheperspectivestheyhaveinreconstruction.Thegovernmentalsotooktimetogetclarityandconsensusontheprocessofdisburse-mentof funds,establishing fieldoffices,educatingstaffandmobilizationofengineers,amongothers.TheNRAitselfwasparalyzedforseveralmonthsinabsenceofsufficientworkingstaffandthesupportfromotherinstitutionswithwhomtheNRAhastoworktogether.
Withthetenureoffiveyearsandpossibilityofextensionofoneyear,theNRAen-gageditselfininitialpreparationandcreatingbaseforreconstructionforalmostayear.Atthesametime,thecountrygotinvolvedintheconsecutiveelectionsoffederal,pro-
62 Nepal
vincialandlocallevelsstartingfromMay2017toDecember2017.Ithadsevereimpedi-mentsintheprocessofreconstructionfrombothgovernmentandcitizens.
Absenceoflocalelectedrepresentativeswasanotherhurdletoestablishreciprocalrelationshipwithcitizeninpost-earthquakesituation.Giventheabsenceoflegitimatelo-calinstitutions,thereconstructionfollowedcentralizedmodel,withlittlespaceforciti-zentoexpresstheirinterests.Almostalldesignsofprivatebuildingwereuniformpro-totype irrespectiveofpersonalneedsofcitizen.Theprocesswaseither inflexibleorcommunicatedasinflexible.Itcouldnotattractthevictimsimmediatelytoparticipateinreconstruction.
Theelectionoflocalgovernmentsin2017,afterabreakofalmosttwodecadespro-ducedanewpowerdynamicsandgavelegitimateoptionsforvictimstoechotheircon-cerns.Thelocalgovernments,sincetheirformation,showedconcernedoverreconstruc-tionprocessandventilatedgrievancesreportingofvictimsonreconstruction. In lateJanuary2019, theNRAhandedover theentireprocessof reconstructionofprivatehouseholdstolocalgovernments.Wewilldiscusstheroleoflocalgovernmentindisas-terriskmanagementinlatersection.
Ⅷ. Statistics of ReconstructionAsofApril2019,thereconstructionisanongoingbusiness.Thereconstructionismov-ingatdifferentspeedondifferentsectors.Thereconstructionprocesscompletesinfivestages–survey,identificationofbeneficiariesandvalidation,enrolmentandagreement,reconstructionanddisbursementoffundsandcompletion.TheFigure2showsthedif-ferentialprogressonreconstruction.
Reconstructionofprivatesettlementconstitutesmajorportionofwork.The latestrecordshowsthattherecoveryismovingforwardbutatslowpaceatearlystageandspikeinthethirdyearandexpectedtoslowdownthereafter.Ofthosewhohadagree-mentforreconstruction,bytheendofFebruary2020,82percenthaveeitherstartedorcompletedthereconstructionofprivatehouses.However,therearecriticsthatthere-constructionhasbeen instrumental todisburseandreceivegovernment’s fundratherthanaddressingcitizen’sinterestasitconvertedthetraditionalhousesintosingleroomhouses(TheKathmanduPost,2018).Comparedtoprivatesettlements,schoolbuildingsandpublicoffices, reconstructionofdrinkingwater infrastructures, securityagencybuildings,culturalheritagesandpublichealthbuildingsisrelativelyslow.
Ⅸ. Lessons and Perils of Gorkha EarthquakeTheGorkhaearthquakedidnotonlyleavescarsinNepalisocietybutalsotaughtsever-allessonsthatNepalistatehastoponderforbuildingaresilientsociety.ForemergingcountrylikeNepal,investingondisasterriskmanagementdoesnotgetpriorityforsev-eralreasonslikeresourcecrunch,poorinstitutionalcapacityandlimitedchoicesforciti-zens.Asaresult,therescueandreliefactivitiesremainuppermostagendaindisasterriskmanagementinNepal.Asabarometerofmeasuringinstitutional,social,economic
Nepal 63
andpoliticalstrengths,theGorkhaearthquakedisclosedseveralshortfallsofNepal’sdi-sastergovernance.Nepal’shasseveralgoodlessonstocherishforthewaysitmanagedcomparedtosimilar typeofcatastrophe inHaiti in2010 (Auerbach,2015),at least inrescuesandrelief.Thissectionsummarizeskeyshortcomingsthatcanbeaddressedinfutureriskreductionplan.
The lessonscanbeorganized intotwobroaderdomains-structuralandnon-struc-turallessons.Thestructural lessonssupportforimprovingperformanceofgovernmentbystrengtheninginstitutionalarrangement.Theinstitutionsandlegalinstrumentsthatwere inplace forreducingvulnerabilityandsafeguardingcitizen,wereeither incom-pleteornotfullyfunctioning.Theorganizationsworkingindisasterriskmanagementwereshortfallofequipment,knowledgeandresources.Thelawsandpolicyguidelineswereinadequatelycommunicatedandamasterplanofreducingvulnerabilityandim-provingresiliencywasnot inplace.Despitean increasingattention,thestructuralre-formwasslow.Forexample, it tookadecadetopreparedisasterriskreductionandmanagementact.Thefirstdraftwaspreparedin2007andaftermuchhic-upsandde-liberations,theactwasapprovedbytheparliamentonlyinSeptember2017.Thedetailsofactarediscussedinnextsection.
Lapsesinmechanismstostrengthencoordinationamonginstitutionswereapparent(MinistryofHomeAffairs[MoHA],2017).Theinfluxofinternationalhumanitarianagen-ciesandlocalorganized/unorganizedgroupswithreliefmaterialshadunequaldistribu-tion,astherecouldnotbechannelforthereliefdistributioninamanagedway(Sthapit,
T=TargetNote: a)Forprivatehouseholds,onlynewconstructionisincluded.Thetargetisreducedthanearlierreport
byremovingsomedefaultbeneficiaries. b)Noupdateisavailableindrinkingwaterinfrastructures. c)Forotherfacilities,retrofittingprojectsarealsoincluded.
Source:NationalReconstructionAuthority,2020,retrieved fromhttp://nra.gov.np/mapdistrict/datavisualiza-tion,accessedon1March2020.
Figure 2:PercentageofCompletedorUnderConstructionAgainstTargetasofMarch2020
64 Nepal
2015;Sharma,KC,Subedi,&Pokharel,2018) .Victimsofconvenientplacesgotmorebenefitswhilethoseatdistancestruggledforminimumentitlements.
Lowenforcementof lawsandguidelinesrelatedtoriskreductionheightenedthevulnerability.Thebuildingcodes,forexample,wereintroducedinmajorcitiesbutwerepoorly followedandgoverned (Pokharel&Goldsworthy,2017),Nosuchcodeswerepracticedinruralareas,wherethemostcasualtieshappened.Similarly,themonitoringofcomplianceofsafetyprovisionsandremovingvulnerableinfrastructuresalsogotlowpriorities.
Thenon-structurallessonsarerelatedtothelevelofknowledgeandbehaviorofciti-zenstowardsresiliency. It isalsoabouttheknowledgeandskillsofofficebearersre-sponsiblefordisasterriskreduction.Theinvestmentofstatetoencouragecitizensforsafersettlementsandincreasingawarenessondifferentformsofdisasterwasrelativelyinadequate.Educatingcitizensontheirexposuretovulnerabilityandinducingtoprac-ticeriskreductionmeasureseitherbyrelocationofsettlementorapplyingmitigationmeasureswasnotinhighpriority.Applyingbuildingcodeswasconsideredasatechni-calbutrequiredtopromoteassocialissue(NationalSocietyforEarthquakeTechnolo-gy-Nepal[NSET],2017),thatchangescitizens’behaviortowardsresiliency.
Engagingcitizensindesigningsolutionsforpost-earthquakereconstructionwasun-dermined.Considerationofvictim’ssocio-culturalaspectsand involvingthemforde-signingreconstructionspecifications iscritical forsustainablerecovery (Basnet,2015;Sharma,KC,Subedi,&Pokharel,2018).Asaresult,victimswerereluctanttoparticipateinreconstructionatearlystage(NepalDevelopmentResearchInstitute,2017).Thepos-sibilityofusingtechnologythat isculturally friendlyandbasedon indigenousknowl-edgewouldattractcitizen’sparticipationinsuchrecoveryprocess.
TheMoHAhas identified33reformareas fromthe2015aftermath,mostof themarestructuralreform.Somemajorlessonsarepolicyreformsincludingnewactondi-sastermanagement; institutionalreforms includingextensionofdisastermanagementunittolocallevel,equippingthem;preparingaframeworkformobilizingalliedagenciesandhumanresources;humanitarianstagingarea,amongothers. Ithasalso identifiedvulnerabilityassessment,increasingcivicawarenessandpromotingcommunityinvolve-mentincycleofdisasterriskmanagement(MinistryofHomeAffairs[MoHA],2016).
Despiteshortcomings,theGorkhaearthquakealsohassomegoodlessonsthatNepalhasto translate into longer-termstrategiesofbuildingresilientsociety.Forexample,thesocialcapitalwherethepeoplespontaneouslystoodtogethertoextendsupporttoaffectedpeopleandcontributedlargelyinrecoveryactivities.Ithasalsoprovedthatifthegovernment iscommitted, itcouldmobilize itsmachineryveryeffectivelyat thetimeofcatastrophe.The increasingsensitizationofbuildingresilient societyamonggovernmentsagencies, thealliedagenciesandcitizens tobeconsideredasassetandneedtoimprovefurther.
Nepal 65
Ⅹ. Post Gorkha Earthquake Institutional ArrangementPost Disaster Recovery Framework (PDRF), 2016TakingtheGorkhaaftermathasalearninglabfordealingwithlarge-scalecatastrophe,thegovernment introducedsomepolicyand legalreformsto improve institutionalca-pacity.TheNRA introducedPostDisasterRecoveryFramework (PDRF)2016-2020withavisionto‘well-planned,resilientsettlementsandprosperoussociety’,hasdefinedfivestrategic interventionareas―safestructures,socialcohesion,access toservices,livelihoodsupportandcapacitybuilding (NationalReconstructionAuthority [NRA],2016).ThePDRFservesasa frameworktorespond languishingandwoefulrecoveryactivitiesinamoreplannedandsustainablemannertoattainresilience(Anhorn,2018;SAWTEE,2018).
TheFrameworkischerishedasablueprintbytheorganizationsworkinginrecov-ery.Basedontheframework,theNRAmadesubsequentpolicyrevisionsandrecoveryguidelinestofacilitatethereconstruction.ThePDRFprosedfouractivitiestostrength-en local capacity in recovery- a) settingup resource centers inpartnershipwithnon-governmentalorganizationsforstandardizationofapproachesandidentifyinggoodpractices,b)supportingcommunitylevelanddistrictlevelprojectimplementationunits,c)hiringspecializedskillsforreconstructionofheritagethatrequirespecialskills,andd)developing training strategies to supply trainedconstructionworkers.ThePDRFshouldnotbetakenonlyasaninterimdocumenttocompletepost-earthquakerecoverybuttotakeasbenchmarkingframeworkforbuildingresiliencybymobilizingbroadernetworkandstrengtheningcapacityofsub-nationalinstitutions.
Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act (DRRMA), 2017 Aftermuchoweddeliberationandcontroversiesaround,NepalendorsedDisasterRiskReductionandManagementAct(DRRMA)on24September2017,replacingNatu-ralCalamityReliefAct1982.TheActenvisions to ‘coordinateandeffectivemanage-mentofactivitiesrelatedtonaturalandnon-naturaldisasters;toprotectlifeofcitizensandpublic,privateand individualproperties, toprotectnaturalandculturalheritageandphysical infrastructure’ (NepalLawCommission,2017).TheAct isconsideredasprogressiveandcomprehensive (MinistryofHomeAffairs [MoHA],2017)comparedtopast legalarrangements.TheActhasbeenpromulgatedatthetimeNepalhas intro-ducednewConstitutionthathasfederalizedthegovernancesystemwithdelineationofrolesandresponsibilitiesofpublicaffairsamong federal,provincialand localgovern-ments.KeyfeaturesoftheActinclude:
・ Recognizeddisasterasmulti-dimensionalissueandadoresdisastercycle–pre-vention,mitigation,emergencypreparedness,responseandrecoveryplan
• Buildingresiliencesocietyascoreobjective・ Dedicated ‘NationalDisasterRiskReductionandManagementAuthority’ to
overseedisasterriskmanagementactivitiesonaregularbasis・ Devolutionofdisasterriskmanagementactivitiestoprovinceandlocalgovern-
66 Nepal
mentsandstrengthentheircapacity・ Buildingallianceswithorganizationsworkinginriskmanagement
Figure 3:InstitutionalStructureforDisasterGovernanceProposedinNDRRMAct2017
TheActhasmadeprovisiontoset-upNationalCouncilforDisasterRiskReductionandManagement(NCDRRM)underthechairmanshipofthePrimeMinisterasanapexbody.Inordertoimplementpoliciesandplansformulatedbythecouncil,therewillbeanExecutiveCommitteeundertheHomeMinisterandExpertTeamcomprisingex-pertsfromgeology,environment,infrastructureandothers.NationalDisasterReductionandManagementAuthority (NDRMA)willbeset-upunder theHomeMinistry.AtProvincelevel,therewillbeProvincialDisasterManagementCommittee(PDMC)underthechairmanshipof theChiefMinister.At local level, therewillbeDistrictDisasterManagementCommittee(DDMC)andLocalDisasterManagementCommittee(LDMC).Themajorrights,responsibilitiesanddutiesarealsoprovisionedasinstitutionalset-upbydisastertypes, levelofgovernanceanddisastermanagementcyclesthatmaketheactmoreprogressive.
Sendai Framework of Action (2015-2030)NepaladoptedtheSendaiFrameworkofActionwithvisiontostandtogetherininter-nationalcommunities forbuildingnationalcapacity indisasterresilience.The frame-workassertsto‘setthegoaltopreventthecreationofnewrisk,reducingexistingriskandstrengthenresilience’(Pal&Ghosh,2017).Thecountriesandinternationalcommu-nitiesstoodtogetherwithapromisetoprotectpeople’srighttoliveinasaferenviron-mentandbuildingnationalstrengthenstoreducetheriskofdisaster.TheGovernmentofNepal localized the frameworkandtranslated intonationaldisasterriskreductionpolicyandstrategicactionplanwith18priorityareasasmentionedinsectionbelow.
Nepal 67
ThefourprioritiesofSendaiframeworkPriorities 1:UnderstandingdisasterriskPriorities 2:Strengtheningdisasterriskgovernancetomanagedisasterrisk.Priorities 3:InvestingindisasterriskmanagementforresiliencePriorities 4:Enhancingdisasterpreparednessforeffectiveresponseandto‘BuildBackBetter’
inrecovery,rehabilitationandreconstruction.
Source:UnitedNations,(2015)
National Disaster Risk Reduction Policy (NDRRP) 2018Inordertofacilitateandinstitutionalizeriskreductioninitiatives,theNDRRPemphasiz-esonthebuildingresilientsociety.ThePolicyenvisions to ‘buildresilientnation’ forcontributinginsustainabledevelopment(MinistryofHomeAffairs[MoHA],2018).Basedonthispolicy,anationaldisasterriskreductionstrategicactionplanwasadoptedfortheperiodof2018to2030,whichcorroborateswiththesustainabledevelopmentgoalsandSendaiframeworkofaction.Thesedocumentsofferwiderangesofpolicyandstra-tegicoptionstostrengthendisastergovernanceandimprovethecapacityofstateandthesocietyforbuildingresiliency.Foundedonthelessonsandexperiencesfromimple-mentationofNSDRM2009andtheGorkhaearthquake2015,therecentpolicyandstra-tegicplanendorsedfollowingpriorityareasandactionsforbuildingNepalasaferandresilientcountry.
Priority Area 1: Understanding disaster riskPriorityAction1:Hazard-wiseassessmentofriskPriorityAction2:Inter-agencycoordinationformulti-hazardriskassessmentPriorityAction3:Developmentofeffectivedisastermanagement informationsys-
temandinformationdisseminationPriorityAction4:Capacitybuildingforunderstandingdisasterrisk
Priority Area 2: Strengthening disaster risk governance at federal, provincial and local level
PriorityAction5:EstablishingandstrengtheningorganizationalstructuresPriorityAction6:DevelopinglegalandregulatoryframeworksPriorityAction7:Capacitybuilding,collaborationandpartnershipfordisasterrisk
governancePriorityAction8:Ensuringinclusivenessindisasterriskreduction
Priority Area 3: Promoting comprehensive risk-informed private and public investments in disaster risk reduction for resilience
PriorityAction 9:PromotinginvestmentforbuildingresiliencePriorityAction10:PromotingpublicinvestmentindisasterriskreductionPriorityAction11:PromotingprivateinvestmentindisasterriskreductionPriorityAction12:Increasingdisasterresilience throughrisk transfer, insurance
andsocialsecurity
68 Nepal
Priority Area 4: Enhancing disaster preparedness for effective response and to ‘build back better’ in recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction
PriorityAction13:Strengtheningdisasterpreparedness foreffectivedisasterre-sponse
PriorityAction14:Developmentofmulti-hazardearlywarningsystemfordisasterpreparedness
PriorityAction15:Promotingcommunity-baseddisasterriskreductionPriorityAction16:Strengtheningcommunicationanddisseminationsystemfordi-
sasterpreparednessPriorityAction17:CapacitybuildingforsearchandrescuePriorityAction18:Promoting ‘buildbackbetter’approach inrecovery,rehabilita-
tionandreconstruction
Eachpriorityisclearlymentionedwithactivities,expectedoutcomes,timeframe,re-sponsibleagenciesandsupportingagencies,whichmakestheroleoftheentiredisasterstakeholderclearer.Thismakescollaborationamongthethreetiersofgovernmenteasi-erinbuildingaresilientNepal.Promulgationofnewacttoaddressnewsocio-economicandpoliticaldynamicsand lessons learnt fromrecentmassivedisaster isawelcomework.The15thfive-yearplanfor2019-2024hasalsoenvisionedmakingNepala‘disastersafeandresilientnation’(NationalPlanningCommission[NPC],2019),forwhichnumberofpolicyinterventionsandstrategiesareidentified.However,theprovisionsareyettofunction fullyandtheresultsarenotyetrealized.The importantaspect ishowthestrengthsofdisastergovernancecascadestocommunitythroughlocalinstitutions.
Ⅺ. The Constitution and Local Government in Disaster Risk Management
The Constitution of Nepal, 2015Afteralongpoliticalnegotiation,battleandturmoil,NepaladoptednewConstitutionon20September2015.TheConstitutionischerishedthananyearlierversiononfollowingaspects:
・ TheConstitutionhasended longcentralized formofgovernanceand ithasconstitutionallyrecognizedthreelevelsofgovernment–federal,provincialandlocal.
・ Thestatepowerisconstitutionallyassignedamongthreelevelsofgovernment.・ Aconsiderableamountofstateauthorityandresponsibilitiesisassignedtothe
localgovernments.・ TheLocalgovernmentsareconsideredas thenearestpublicentity todeal
withthecitizens’basic issuesincludingriskmanagement.Therefore,uninter-ruptedpresenceoflocalgovernmentisensuredandthepoliticaldifferencesinfunctioningareundermined.
TheConstitutionrequiresstateto‘makeadvancewarning,preparedness,rescue,re-liefandrehabilitationinordertomitigateriskfromnaturaldisasters’(MinistryofLaw,JusticeandParliamentaryAffairs,2017).TheConstitutionfurtherunderscoresdisasterriskmanagementisconcertedeffortofallthreespheresofthegovernmentsandhence
Nepal 69
theyshouldworkintandem.Theresponsibilityofmanagingdisasterissharedrespon-sibilityamongfederal,provincialand localgovernments,while the localgovernmentsalsohave‘disastermanagement’astheirexclusiveresponsibility,makingthemaccount-ableforrespondingdisasters(MinistryofHomeAffairs[MoHA],2017).Thisunderscorestheunabatedrolesofthelocalgovernmentstodealwithdisasterasimmediaterespond-erclosertothecitizens.TheConstitutionhasalsoprovisionedforstablelocalgovern-mentthatwillfunctioninprincipleofcivicengagement,ratherthanacoercivegovern-ment.
Local Government Operation Act (LGOA), 2017Oneofthemajorinstrumentstoorganizeandfacilitatetheexerciseofauthorityatlocallevel,theLGOAispreparedbasedontheconstitutionalassignmentofrolestothelocalgovernment.TheLGOAelaboratestheroleoflocalgovernmentsindisasterriskman-agementinthefollowing12areas(NepalLawCommission,2017):
・ Formulation,implementation,monitoring,evaluationandregulationoflocalpol-icies,laws,standardsandplansrelatedtodisastermanagement,
・ Local leveldisasterpreparednessandresponseplan,earlywarningsystem,searchandrescue,bufferstock,distributionandcoordinationofreliefmateri-als,
・ Localriverembankment,landslidecontrolandmanagementandregulationofrivers,
・ Mappingofdisasterriskareas,andidentificationandrelocationofsettlements,・ Support,coordinationandcooperationwith federal,provincialand localcom-
munities,organizationsandprivatesectorfordisastermanagement,・ Establishmentandoperationofdisastermanagementfundandresourcemobi-
lization,・ Formulation, implementation,monitoringandregulationof local levelprojects
relatedtodisasterriskreduction,・ Locallevelrehabilitationandreconstructionafterdisaster,・ Datamanagementandresearchstudiesrelatedtolocalleveldisasters,・ Localemergencyworkoperationsystem,・ Operationofcommunitybaseddisastermanagementprograms,and・ Otherworksrelatedtodisastermanagement.
Besides,severalother instrumentsmake localgovernmentsresponsible fordealingwithdisaster.However,consideringthatdisasterisnotonlythenaturalphenomenabutalso largelysocial (Perry,2018),requiresamultitudecombinationofapproach,efforts,interventionand investments.The localgovernmentsareconsideredasthe foremostshieldtobuildaresilientsocietybutrequireafurtherinvestmenttostrengthentheircapacity (Ministry ofHomeAffairs [MoHA], 2017;Nepal,Khanal,&Sharma, 2018;Pokharel,etal.,2018).
Conclusion: Towards ResiliencyNepal,beingathighriskofexposure todifferent formsofdisasters, isstruggling to
70 Nepal
overcome its social, economicandpolitical factors thataggravate thevulnerability.Learningfrompastlessonsandkeepingtheonusofmakingthesocietyresilientispri-mafacieagendaof thegovernment.Foranydisaster, thevictimsthemselvesarethefirstrespondersandtherecomesthecommunitylater.Inacountrywithpronetomul-tipleformsofdisaster,citizen’sawarenessis instrumentalassettoimplementtheriskreduction initiatives.Arecent ‘NepalNationalGovernanceSurvey2017/18’conductedbyNepalAdministrativeStaffCollegeamongcitizensof18yearsandabovefindsdif-ferential levelofawarenessaboutrisksofdifferent formsofdisaster in their locality(Figure4).Beinginactiveseismiczoneandpronetootherformsofdisasters,slightlyoverone-fifthpeopleonlyconsidertheyhavehighriskofearthquake,whilethosecon-sideringhighriskof flooding is three-tenth.Lessthanone-fifthconsider landslidehashighriskforthem,whilethree-tenthconsiderhighriskofstorm.
Source:NepalAdministrativeStaffCollege[NASC],(2018)
Figure 4:PerceivedRiskofDisasters,2017/18,Nepal(N=12872)
Afurtherassessmentbythesamesurvey,onpeople’sawarenessaboutriskman-agementinitiativesintheirlocality,callsformoreconcertedinvestmentsincreatingre-silientenvironment.Lessthan40percentofcitizensareonlyawareaboutany initia-tivesinthelocality,thehighest(36%)forcommitteesorgroupondisastermanagementandlowest(19%)forlocaldisasterriskmanagementplan.Thesuccessofanyinitiativelargelydependsontowhatextentthecitizensareeducatedandtakenonboardduringimplementation.
Nepal 71
Source:NepalAdministrativeStaffCollege[NASC],(2018)
Figure 5:AwarenessAboutRiskManagementInitiatives,2017/18,Nepal(N=12872)
Thesetwofiguresshowadisparitybetweenintopolicyprovisionsandthelevelofcitizen’sengagementinriskreductionactivities.Theappreciatedsuccessofthe ‘resil-ientsociety’largelydependsonhoweffectivelythegovernmentandalliedorganizationsimprovetheircapacityandreachout topeople. Improvedawarenessamongcitizenswouldsufficethegovernmenteffortsandawarecitizenswouldholdgovernmentandotherorganizationsaccountablefortheirresponsibilities.Lowknowledgeandparticipa-tionofpeopleinriskreductioninitiativesshouldhavedueconsiderationasapotentialdrawbackinthepathofresiliency.
Nepal’sdeservesapplaudsinthewayitmanagedseveralbigcatastrophesinrecentpast,particularlyonimmediaterescueandrelief.Itcouldhappenbecauseofcollectiveeffortsof thegovernment,humanitarianagenciesandsociety.However, therecoveryphasesuffersseveralimpedimentsmainlybecauseofinsufficientpreparationandweakinstitutionalcapacitytodeliverthepolicydecisions(MinistryofHomeAffairs[MoHA],2017).Toachievethegoalof ‘resilientstate’,Nepalhastoworkmore indisasterpre-parednessratherthanwaitingdisastertooccurandhavereactiveapproachestoad-dressthem.
Beingacountrywith lowpercapita income, thesocialand individualcapacity todealwithdisasterriskreductionusingsophisticatedtechnology iscostly,whichmaydiscouragepeopletofollowguidelines.Usingindigenousknowledgeandtechnologyisagoodoption,whichmakes resiliency locally adaptedandculturally informed.Asayounganddynamiccountry,Nepalwillcontinuetogrow.Formeetingpeople’saspira-tionofadevelopedandprosperouscountry,Nepalisunderpressurefordemandsofin-vestment indevelopmentactivities.Thiswouldto leadtogrowth inconstructionof,largeorsmall,infrastructuresthatrequirecontributinginbuildingdisasterresiliency.
Notes 1 BothareDirectorofStudies,NepalAdministrativeStaffCollege.
72 Nepal
2 Inearlierpoliticaladministrationsystem,Nepalwassub-dividedintofiveadministrativere-gions-Eastern,Central,Western,Mid-westernandFar-westerndevelopmentregion.EachregionwasgovernedbyaRegionalAdministrator,who isacareerbureaucratFollowingthenewConstitutionin2015,thisstructureisdissolved.
ReferencesAnhorn,J.(2018).NepalandtheUrbanResilienceUtopia.InA.Fekete,&F.Fiedrich(Eds.),Ur-
ban Disaster Resilience and Security(pp.13-26).Cham,Switzerland:Springer.Auerbach,P. (2015).PreparednessExplainsSomeDifferencesbetweenHaitiandNepal’sRe-
sponse toEarthquake.BMJ: British Medical Journal, 350.Retrieved fromhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26520874
Basnet,G. (2015,December17).EquitableReconstruction.The Himalayan Times.RetrievedApril20,2019,fromhttps://thehimalayantimes.com/opinion/equitable-reconstruction/
Bhandari,S. (2014).Self-determination and Constitution Making in Nepal: Constituent Assembly, Inclusion and Ethnic Federalism.London:Springer.
CentralBureauofStatistics[CBS]. (2014).Population Monograph of Nepal Volume I: Population Dynamics.Kathmandu:CentralBureauofStatistics.
Dhakal,R.K.(2016).LessonsLearntfromthe2015GorkhaEarthquakeinNepalontheEngineer-ingGeologicalPerspectives. InS.P.Singh,S.C.Khanal,&M.Joshi,Lessons from Nepal’s Earthquakes for Indian Himalayas and the Gangatic Plains(pp.15-29).Nainital,India:Cen-tralHimalayanEnvironmentAssociation(CHEA).
Dhital,M.R.(2015).Geology of the Nepal Himalaya: Regional Perspective of the Classic Collided Oregen.NewYork:Springer.
Fordham,M.,Lovekamp,W.E.,Thomas,D.S.,&Phillips,B.D.(2013).UnderstandingSocialVul-nerability.InD.S.Thomas,B.D.Phillips,W.E.Lovekamp,&A.Fothergill(Eds.),Social Vul-nerability to Disasters(pp.1-32).NewYork:CRCPress.
GovernmentofNepal.(2015).Act Relating to Reconstruction of the Earthquake Affected Structures 2015.Kathmandu:GovernmentofNepal.RetrievedFebruary12,2019, fromhttp://www.nra.gov.np/np/resources/details/wat8GjmUXk_Yixi2KoVYeZAyT1q0sXKjnmS_eARKDAI
Gunn,A.M.(2008).Encyclopedia of Diasters: Environmental Catastrophes and Human Tragedies Vol I.London:GreenwoodPress.
Kaufman,D.,Kraay,A.,&Mastruzzi,M.(2009).Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate and Individ-ual Governance Indicators, 1996-2008. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4978.WashingtonDC:WorldBank.RetrievedFebruary19,2019, fromKaufmann,DanielandKraay,AartandMastruzzi,Massimo,GovernanceMattersVIII:AggregateandIndivid-ualGovernanceIndicators,1996-2008(June29,20https://ssrn.com/abstract=14
Khrul,J.H.,Adhikari,R.,&Dorka,U.E.(2018).EarthquakesasEventsofInter-andIntra-disci-plinaryCharacteristics-WithSpecialReferencetoGorkha2015EarthquakeinNepal.InJ.H.Khrul,R.Adhikari,&U.E.Dorka,Living Under the Threat of Earthquakes: Short and Long-term Management of Earthquake Risks and Damage Prevention in Nepal(pp.1-26).London:Springer.
Lord,A.,&Moktan,S.(2017).UncertainAftermath.Accord,128-132.RetrievedMarch20,2019,fromhttps://www.c-r.org/downloads/Accord-26-Nepal-WEB_0.pdf
MinistryofHomeAffairs[MoHA]&DiasterPreparednessNetwork-Nepal[DPNet-Nepal].(2015).Nepal Disaster Report 2015.Kathmandu:MoHA.
MinistryofHomeAffairs[MoHA].(2009).National Strategy for Disaster Risk Management 2009.Kathmandu:GovernmentofNepal.
Ministry ofHomeAffairs [MoHA]. (2016).Gorkha Earthquake 2015-Experience and Lesson [Gorkha Bhukampa 2072: Anubhav Ra Sikai, in Nepali].Kathmandu:MoHA.
Nepal 73
MinistryofHomeAffairs [MoHA]. (2017).Nepal Disaster Report 2017: The Road to Sendai .Kathmandu:GovernmentofNepal.
MinistryofHomeAffairs[MoHA].(2018).National Disaster Risk Reduction Policy 2018 [In Ne-pali].Kathmandu:GovernmentofNepal.
MinistryofLaw,JusticeandParliamentaryAffairs.(2017).The Constitution of Nepal.Kathmadu:GovernmentofNepal.
NationalPlanningCommission[NPC].(2013).13th Three Year Plan.Kathmandu:GovernmentofNepal.
NationalPlanningCommission[NPC].(2015).Nepal Earthquake 2015: Post Disaster Needs Assess-ment Vol A.Kathmandu:NationalPlanningCommission[NPC].
NationalPlanningCommission[NPC].(2015).Nepal Earthquake 2015: Post Disaster Needs Assess-ment Vol A.Kathmandu:NPC.
NationalPlanningCommission[NPC].(2019).15th Plan 2019-2024: Approach Paper [in Nepali].Kathmandu:GovernmentofNepal.
NationalReconstructionAuthority[NRA].(2016).Nepal Earthquake 2015: Post Disaster Recovery Framework 2016-2020.Kathmandu:NRA.
NationalSociety forEarthquakeTechnology-Nepal [NSET]. (2017).Safer Society: NSET Report 2017.Kathmandu:NSET.RetrievedApril20,2019,fromhttps://www.nset.org.np/nset2012/images/publicationfile/Safer%20Society_Annual%20Report_FINAL_Small_1.pdf
NepalAdministrativeStaffCollege[NASC].(2018).Nepal National Governance Survey 2017/18.Lalitpur:NepalAdministrativeStaffCollege.
NepalDevelopmentResearchInstitute. (2017).Detailed Study of Poverty and Vulnerability in Four Earthquake-Affected Districts in Nepal: Gorkha, Dhading, Nuwakot and Rasuwa.Kath-mandu:NepalDevelopmentResearchInstitute.RetrievedApril10,2019,fromhttp://www.ndri.org.np/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Report_DFID_UNOPS-Volume-A-Final_.pdf
NepalLawCommission.(1982).Natual Calamity (Relief) Act 1982.Kathmandu:NepalLawCom-mission.
NepalLawCommission.(2017).Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act.Kathmandu:Gov-ernmentofNepal.RetrievedApril 18, 2019, fromhttp://drrportal.gov.np/uploads/docu-ment/1509.pdf
NepalLawCommission.(2017).Local Government Operation Act [in Nepali].Kathmandu:Govern-mentofNepal.
Nepal,P.,Khanal,N.R.,&Sharma,B.P.(2018).PoliciesandInstitutionsforDisasterRiskMan-agement:AReview.The Geographical Journal of Nepal, 11,1-24.
NSET.(2012,July).Hazards in Nepal: Earthquakes.RetrievedMarch15,2019,fromNSET:http://www.nset.org.np/nset2012/index.php/menus/subsubmenudetail/menuid-58/submenuid-137/subsubmenuid-48
Pal,I.,&Ghosh,T.(2017).Natural Hazards Management in Asia.NewDelhi:SAGEIndiaPublica-tion.
Perry,R.W.(2018).DefiningDisaster:AnEovolvingConcept.InH.Rodríguez,J.E.Trainor,&W.Donner(Eds.),Handbook of Disaster Research(pp.3-22).Switzerland:SpringerInternationalPublishingAG.
Pokharel,T.,&Goldsworthy,H.M.(2017).LessonslearnedfromtheNepalearthquake2015.Aus-tralian Journal of Structural Engineering, 18(1),11-23.
Pokharel,T.,Manandhar,M.,Dahal,A.,Chalise,B.,Kharel,T.,&Bhandari,R. (2018).Political Economy Analysis of Post-earthquake Reconstruction in Nepal: An Assessment of Emerging Role of Local Governments.Lalitpur:NepalAdministrativeStaffCollegeandTheAsiaFoundation.
SAWTEE.(2018).Nepal Post-disaster Reconstruction: Current Status and Lesson Learnt.Kathma-
74 Nepal
du:SAWTEE.RetrievedApril 18, 2019, fromhttp://www.sawtee.org/publications/Poli-cy-Brief-36.pdf
Sharma,K.,KC,A.,Subedi,M.,&Pokharel,B.(2018).ChallengesforReconstructionafterMw7.8GorkhaEarthquake:AStudyonaDevastatedAreaofNepal.Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 9(1),760-790.doi:10.1080/19475705.2018.1480535
Sthapit,C.W. (2015).Gendered Impactsof theEarthquakeandResponses inNepal.Feminist Studies, 41(3),682-688.doi:10.15767/feministstudies.41.3.682
TheAsiaFoundation. (2011).Political Economy Analysis of Local Governance in Nepal.Kath-mandu:TheAsiaFoundation.RetrievedMarch13,2019,fromhttps://asiafoundation.org/re-sources/pdfs/analysislocalgovernancenepal.pdf
TheKathmanduPost. (2018,April 24).Quakerecoveryhitsnewhurdle:Survivorsbuilding1-roomhomes.The Kathmandu Post.RetrievedMarch10,2019, fromhttps://kathmandu-post.ekantipur.com/news/2018-04-24/quake-recovery-hits-new-hurdle-survivors-building-1-room-homes.html
UnitedNations.(2015).Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030.Geneva:TheUnitedNationsOfficeforDisasterRiskReduction.RetrievedMarch10,2019,fromhttps://www.unisdr.org/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf
Recommended