18/05/06P. Nedelec - 4th Air Fluorescence Workshop Measurements of FLY with MACFLY

18/05/06 P. Nedelec - 4th Air Fluorescence Workshop

Measurements of FLY with MACFLY

2

Measurement of Air Cerenkov and Fluorescence Light Yield

http://wwwlapp.in2p3.fr/MACFLY/

LAPP (France): Pierre COLIN, Patrick NEDELEC;LIP (Portugal): Antonio ONOFRE;JINR (Russia): Leonid TKATCHEV, Artem CHUKANOV, Basar SABIROV, Yuri NEFEDOV, Sergei POROKHOVOI, Dmitry NAUMOV.

Collaboration:

3

Original Goals

To Measure Air FLY variations as a function of atmospheric conditions:

Reproduce and study in laboratory the light emitted

by an “extensive air shower” (EAS)

15 km

2 km

EAS

Temperature Pressure Humidity

- 60°C

10°C

100 hPa

800 hPa

0 %

1 %

Alt

itu

de

(km

)

4MACFLY project = 2 devices

Vacuum pump

N2 Air

Ar

O3

Beam:- β Source- CERN- JINR

PMT

Preshower

Gauge : P,T,H2O

H2O

shower

Gas system

MACFLY 1(for beam)

MACFLY 2(for shower)

5

MF1: a reference device

• Single track events device– Light, compact, movable (plane?),…

• Used both– @ Lab (quiet) – on Test Beam (noisy)

• Measure:– Air/N2FLY– Cherenkov contribution

• Used for comparison with– Other experiments– MF2

6Macfly 1 @ LaboratoryPompe à

vide

90Sr β Source

PMT1

PMT2Electrons

beam

Scintillator

PM Trigger

Radioactive source

Sr90

Optic fibres

Pressure sensor

Main tankTemperature

sensor

Input/ouput of gas

PMT

Vacuum pump

Trigger PMT

7

MF1 cut view

EMI

9820

QA

EMI9820QA

PMT EMI 9820QAQuartz Window

Filters Quartz Lens

Mirror : ~98%(multi-layers)

Light Guide

Electron beam

15 cm

Macfly 1 optical system

EMI9820QA

5 cm

Filter

Filters Transmittance (Schott BG3 and GG385)

8

MF2: looking for real showers

• A “From single track to showers” device– Heavy, Big, Fix ,…

• Used:– Only on Test Beam Line

• Measure:

– Air/N2 FLY induced by a e- shower (10-50 GeV)

– From 0 to Xmax radiation length

• Used to:– Perform original measurements– for comparison with Monte Carlo prg (G4,…)

9

Macfly 2 (MF2)Ø

96 cm

146 cm

Volume : ~1m3Input/Output of gas system

CERN Beam

PMT

Sensors (P,T)

Cooper target(Preshower)

10

MF2 working process

EM

I

EMI

Black surface

Ø10 cm

Light guide

Filters

Preshower

Electromagnetic Shower

Preshower system:

PMT EMI 9820QAQuartz Window

Electron beam

Stack of copper disks (Thickness :1cm)

Lead shield

11

Measurement campaigns

> At JINR ? : (MF1)– Microtron(12 MeV) and Phasotron (170 MeV) – Pressure and temperature dependencies

> In Lab : (MF1)– Radioactive source (1.5 MeV electron)– Pressure dependence

> At CERN : (MF1+MF2)– SPS test Beam (5-100 GeV e-, μ-, π-)– Pressure dependence: ; Temp., H2O: – Shower age dependence (MF2)

Too noisy! Then a Fire !!!

12

MACFLY set up overview at CERN

Macfly 2

Delay chamber

MF2

Trigger TriggerMF1

Thermal Box

Small Trigger

MF1 in its thermal box

Pumping system

Large Trigger

Delay chamber

13

Macfly Data

Event by event acquisition

PMT signal read by a QADC (Gate=100ns)

Very Low signal: mean=0.01photoelectron

Expected FLY ~ 4 ph/m

~106 triggers/run (1/2 data+1/2 Bgd)

14

Delay chamber

MF2

Trigger TriggerMF1

Thermal Box

Macfly Data selection

Centered events

15

MacFly: Fluo. Signal extraction

DL = FLY x εMF + CDL + Bgd

PMT Detected Light (fit method)

Cherenkov Detected Light

(Geant4 simulation)

Background (Vacuum

measurement)

Fluorescence Light Yield (in photons)

Detector efficiency

(Calibration)

FLY/E = FLY / EdepDeposed Energy(Geant4 Simulation)

16

Macfly Data

Detected Light: PMT spectrum fit Method

Pedestal : (~99% of events)

Single photoelectron(~1% of event)

2 photoelectrons

DL = FLY x εMF + CDL + Bgd

17

MacFly: Geant4 Simulation

Geometrical Acceptance(Optical Properties of surfaces were previously measured)

εMF = Accgeo x QEPMT

DL = FLY x εMF + CDL + Bgd

18

MacFly: Geant4 Simulation

DL = FLY x εMF + CDL + Bgd

Cherenkov Light: compare simulation with data

LensesCerenkovcatcher

e-

Cherenkov light in MF1

19

MacFly: data

Background:

DL = FLY x εMF + CDL + Bgd

• Well measured events– Random triggers (@lab)– Off-spill triggers (@beam)– Vacuum On-spill triggers (@beam)

20

MacFly: Geant4 Simulation

Radiation length (#X0) 0 disc

1 disc

3 disc

5 disc

7 disc10 disc

Pre-Shower

Deposed Energy in MF2

Deposed Energy:

FLY/E = FLY / Edep

21

Detected Light Composition

DL(Macfly data)

CDL(Simulation)

Bgd(Measurement)

FDLFluorescence detected light

MF1 : 50 GeV e- in airMF1 : 50 GeV e- in air MF1 : 50 GeV e- in N2MF1 : 50 GeV e- in N2

MF1 : 1.5 MeV e- in airMF1 : 1.5 MeV e- in air MF2 : 50GeV Shower in airMF2 : 50GeV Shower in air

22Systematic errors of MF1

Error Sources

MF1 (Dry Air)

CERN Lab.

QE of PMT 10% 10%

Geo. Acc. 8.2% 7.5%

DL Recon. 3.5% 4%

CDL Simu. 2% 0%

Bgd Meas. 2% 1%

FLY : 13.7% 13.2%Edep 1% 1%

FLY/E : 13.7% 13.2%

23

MF1 result: Pressure dependence

We create a model of air FLY proportional to deposed energy which fit all Macfly data.

(Dry air and pure Nitrogen)

24

MF1 result: Energy dependence

Reference point : Dry air at 1atm. & 23ºC: FLY/E = 18 ph/MeVReference point : Dry air at 1atm. & 23ºC: FLY/E = 18 ph/MeV

dEdX: Berger-Seltzer formula All experiments are coherent

25

Absolute measurement

Reference point : Dry air at 1atm. & 23ºC : FLY/E = 18 ph/MeVReference point : Dry air at 1atm. & 23ºC : FLY/E = 18 ph/MeV

dEdX: Berger-Seltzer formula All experiments are coherent

Error< 10% ?

26

MF2 result: Shower age dependence

500 hPa data

100 hPa data

PDG model of shower development

Air FLY follows the shower development !Air FLY follows the shower development !

27

MF2: Air FLY deposed Energy

FLY/Edep and pressure variations independent of the excitation source

FLY/Edep and pressure variations independent of the excitation source

28

Conclusion

Measurements done: P. Colin thesis Dry air and pure Nitrogen fluorescence 1.5 MeV, 20 GeV and 50 GeV incident electron Lab. measurement of air Shower FLY Pressure and Shower age dependencies

Fluorescence model: Air FLY Edep Fitted on Macfly data Compatible with previous exp. (<10%)

Back to the future: PMT calibration Temperature dependence Papers in preparation

Systematic down to: ~10%