1 What Will Determine Our Economic Future? Michael J. Boskin Tully M. Friedman Professor of...

1

What Will Determine Our Economic Future?

Michael J. Boskin

Tully M. Friedman Professor of EconomicsSenior Fellow, Hoover Institution

Senior Fellow, SIEPRStanford University

Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research

Associates Meeting

Stanford University

June 4, 2015

Seven Big Questions On America’s Economic Future

1. Short-run outlook: cyclical or structural weakness? • The Yellen FED, fiscal policy: risk in the exit from extreme measures?

2. Are productivity-enhancing technology gains weakening?• Will the effects of technology and globalization on labor markets abate?

3. Will demography overwhelm our fiscal, economic, and global position?• Will debt and taxes lead to Japanese or European-style stagnation?

4. Will our future labor force be well-enough educated?• Will we have enough workers?

5. Will we reconcile energy needs, environmental concerns and economic growth, given

North America energy revolution?

6. What will the future of international trade, finance and institutions, especially Europe,

the BRICs, and Mideast look like? Plus war, terrorism, global instability

7. Are democracy and robust capitalism ultimately compatible?

(N.B. Stanford scholars doing important work on all of these issues)

2

3

post WWII (1947-present) average = 3.2%

4

U.S. GDP Growth Projections

5

6

7

8

9

Future Demographic Pressures

Old-Age Dependency Ratio

[Persons Aged 65+ / Persons Aged 18-64]

0.19 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.210.24

0.280.32

0.36 0.37 0.37 0.36 0.36

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4[Persons Aged 65+ / Persons Aged 18-64]

0.19 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.210.24

0.280.32

0.36 0.37 0.37 0.36 0.36

0.19 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.210.24

0.280.32

0.36 0.37 0.37 0.36 0.36

0.19 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.210.24

0.280.32

0.36 0.37 0.37 0.36 0.36

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

Projected Growth in Population by Age Group

[Percent, 1980-2030]

11

61

130

176

258

0

50

100

150

200

250

Under 55 55 to 64 65 to 74 75 to 84 85 and Up

Projected Growth in Population by Age Group

[Percent, 1980-2030]

11

61

130

176

258

0

50

100

150

200

250

Under 55 55 to 64 65 to 74 75 to 84 85 and Up

Projected Growth in Population by Age Group

[Percent, 1980-2030]

Projected Growth in Population by Age Group

[Percent, 1980-2030]

11

61

130

176

258

0

50

100

150

200

250

0

50

100

150

200

250

Under 55 55 to 64 65 to 74 75 to 84 85 and UpUnder 55 55 to 64 65 to 74 75 to 84 85 and Up

10

Will Demography Overwhelm Our Fiscal, Economic, and Global Position?

11

Defense Spending as a Percent of GDP

12

How High Would Tax Rates Go?

To finance projected spending on entitlement growth, marginal tax rates

would reach 60-70% for many, higher still at the top

13

Will Our Future Labor Force Be Well-Enough Educated?

14

Source: OECD Program for International Student Assessment, 2012. Tests are given to 15 year-olds across 65 countries.

15

16

N.B. U.S. also now the leading producer of natural gas

17

18

19

20

21

World GINI Index

sources: Xavier Sala-i-Martin, OECD, World Bank

22

Agenda for Prosperity (1)

Roll back the excesses of the welfare state, restore better balance between individual responsibility and incentives and social responsibility BEFORE it’s too late:

• Additional medium-run fiscal consolidation, enacted soon, and difficult to reverse, but phasing in gradually as economy recovers

• Long-run entitlement and tax reform: maintain strong incentives while reducing subsidies to the well off; broaden tax base to more economic activity and more people

• Social Security: indexing, retirement age

• Medicare: age, competition, premium support a la Ryan-Rivlin, Wyden-Ryan

• Tax: transition to broad based consumed income tax with lowest rates possible to raise necessary revenue; corporate tax: broad base, lower rate, territorial system (ideally integrated with personal tax)

23

Agenda for Prosperity (2)

• Budget reform: making programs more effective by eliminating,

consolidating and modernizing; process reform; fiscal constraints;

governance

• Make fiscal and monetary policy much more predictable and

permanent, eliminate endless use of temporary features

• Human capital policy (education, training, and immigration)

• Trade policy: TPP, TTIP, Doha; NAFTA 2.0 and beyond

• Regulation policy, including more sensible financial regulation;

regulatory budget

=> A more efficient, effective, predictable growth-oriented government

strategy that uses policy interventions as a last, not first, resort

24

My Cautious Optimism (1)

• Previous “crises”

• Tendency to overstate the durability of the boom or bust

• 1960s: automation

• 1970-80s: stagflation, OPEC, competition from Japan

• Recently, oil, China, fragile financial system

• But American economy adapted and policies corrected: Reagan, Bush

‘41, Clinton

25

My Cautious Optimism (2)

• Great American advantages:• Best higher education system in the world• Highly productive work force• Deepest most liquid capital market (dollar global reserve currency)• Most innovative companies, from IT to oil and gas• Diverse population supportive of earned success, despite demagoguery• North American energy revolution• Less severe demographic pressure, and less bloated welfare state than

other major economies• But not immutable, e.g. K-12 anti-competitive forces and poor policy

• Test political capability to make serious, even existential, long-run decisions• Churchill on America

26