Enterprise2.0 Case Study: Toronto Transit Camp

  • View
    2.048

  • Download
    0

  • Category

    Business

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Applying the Barcamp unconference model to an organizational challenge. Community-driven Cocreation or Focus Group 2.0?

Citation preview

Case Study:Toronto Transit CampCommunity-Driven Open Innovation or Focus Group 2.0?

1

Copyright Remarkk Consulting, 2007. Distributed under a Creative Commons license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ca/

Online communitymeets physical place.

2

3

Timeline:

December, 2006: TTC’s web site RFP

January 1, 2007: Toronto blogs call for help

January 3, 2007: TTC Chair signals openness

January 10, 2007: Web geek brainstorm

February 4, 2007: Transit Camp event

4

Toronto Transit Camp“Not a complaints department,

a solutions playground”Passion and fun meet practice

Diverse communities

Design Slam

Cultural change

Instantiating community

Modelling for replication

5

Results for TTC

Noticeable shift in relationship: from combative to collaborative

A new model for community engagement and communication

New open-source projects: openttc.ca, opentransit.info

TTC received expertise unavailable in-house

New strategies for a web site RFP:

embraces community and peer-production concept

maximizes brand and service impact with limited resources

6

Social WebNew tools and online-enabled communities are

signalling a new paradigm of

knowledge production.

7

8

New Lenses:Communities

Communities of Practice

Communities of Proximity

Communities of Interest

Communities of Values

Open Creative Communities

Open: no artificial barriers to entry; membership comes from creative citizenship, both professional and amateur

Creative: production of ideas and inventions that are personal, original and meaningful

Community: any group of individuals who interact and share some common characteristics

9

Modeling TransitCampDiscovery and play

passion

fun

practice

Intersections of communities

professional and amateur

interest groups and creators

Community leadership

values

self-interest

10

11

Collaboration

Co-Creation RulesYes, and...

Make an offer to do something

What you want me to do, and why?

Give me a platform

Create opportunity

Play

Understand the environment

Work at it

12

Adapted from J. Moore & J. Cherkoff, http://www.changethis.com/29.03.CoCreationRules,

Love the 1%ers

Get vernacular

Make mistakes

Lower barriers

Let the mess show

Share your secrets

Be changed

Show the humanity

Commons-Based Peer-Production

Granular

Modular

Integratable

Self-selected

Fast/efficient communication

Trust construction

Norm creation

13

Transparency

Monitoring

Peer-review

Discipline

Fairness

Institutional sustainability

Benkler, The Wealth of Networks: http://www.benkler.org/wealth_of_networks/index.php/Main_Page

What is compelling to me?

14

Design for Energy

Communities are naturally occurring social systems

Social systems demonstrate emergent biological properties

Starts with passion and human desires

Intentional communities require design of a loose framework of rules/norms

Play is what happens in the space between the rules

Tapping emergence means activating passion and the play instinct

15

What is the Opportunity?

16

Social Computing Behaviour

17

Gen Y (18-26) Gen X (27-40)Late Boomer

(41-50)Early Boomer

(51-61)Seniors (61+)

Creators 30% 19% 12% 7% 5%

Critics 34% 25% 18% 15% 11%

Collectors 18% 16% 15% 16% 11%

Joiners 57% 29% 15% 8% 6%

Spectators 54% 41% 31% 26% 19%

Inactives 21% 42% 54% 61% 70%

Source: Charlene Li, “Social Technographics”; Forrester Research, 2007

Recommended