BTPsessions Conversations Framework

  • View
    2.105

  • Download
    0

  • Category

    Business

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

the framework + some fat cases to introduce the third BTPsession on Conversations on 28/05/08

Citation preview

5/28/09Slide 2

Promise

5/28/09Slide 3

Beyond the Promise

5/28/09Slide 4

26/05 - Experience27/05 - Media

28/05 - Conversations

5/28/09Slide 5

Why conversations are so dear to us.

5/28/09Slide 6

Because we’re more interested in whatpeople “do”, than in what they “think”.

5/28/09Slide 7

Most traditionalcommunication KPI’swere developed to

measure “what peoplethink”.

5/28/09Slide 8

Conversations provide a metaphor :

- to quantify what people “do”.- to grasp the “active consumer”.

5/28/09Slide 9

Active consumers : when c onsumers do morethan consuming.

5/28/09Slide 10

Active consumers : when people decide tobecome a medium.

5/28/09Slide 11

360° campaign

Media

Creative idea

Brand

Marketing context

Product

Business

Active consumers : when peoplego "beneath the surface”.

5/28/09Slide 12

Active consumers : when brands decide tobecome facilitators.

5/28/09Slide 13

But how to make conversations tangible?

5/28/09Slide 14

Three important KPI’s

Search VolumeSocial IntensityNet Promotor Score

5/28/09Slide 15

http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/zeitgeist2008/

Search volume = active awareness

5/28/09Slide 16

Search volume = active awareness

5/28/09Slide 17

Search volume = active awareness

5/28/09Slide 18

Social Intensity

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/02/02/sports/20090202_superbowl_twitter.html

Social intensity represents the rate at which social actionsoccur such as rating, sharing, blogging, recommending,commenting, etc. Some brands have nearly zero social

intensity -- no one blogs about them, no one sharesinformation, etc. While other brands -- like Apple -- enjoy

continuous, relatively high social intensity.

5/28/09Slide 19

Social Intensity - example 1

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/02/02/sports/20090202_superbowl_twitter.html

5/28/09Slide 20

Social Intensity - example 2

http://www.slideshare.net/VirtualEyeSee/social-media-marketing-whopper-sacrifice

5/28/09Slide 21

Social Intensity - example 2

http://www.slideshare.net/VirtualEyeSee/social-media-marketing-whopper-sacrifice

5/28/09Slide 22

Social Intensity - example 2

http://www.slideshare.net/VirtualEyeSee/social-media-marketing-whopper-sacrifice

5/28/09Slide 23

Social Intensity - measurement Free buzz-tracking

http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/26-free-tools-for-buzz-monitoring.html

Online conversation monitoring http://www.rmmlondon.com/archive/a-survey-of-ten-leading-online-conversation-

monitoring-companies/

Conversation Tracker Insites/Boondoggle

5/28/09Slide 24

Net Promotor Score

5/28/09Slide 25

Net Promotor Score

5/28/09Slide 26

Conversation take-outs

We’re interested in what people “do”, less in what they “think”. Traditional measurement is very much “think”-focussed :

reach/impact. “We need a new metaphor to quantify “do”, which is “conversations”. Search volume, social intensity & net promotor score are three KPI’s

to measure conversations.

5/28/09Slide 27

A case centered aroundconversations as a KPI

5/28/09Slide 28

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgHHX9R4Qtk

5/28/09Slide 29

5/28/09Slide 30

Millions of people watched the video. Hundreds of thousands downloaded the talking points. More than 30,000 received email from their friends through

JewsVote.org. Tens of thousands more have seen our ads in key swing states like

Michigan, Missouri, and Florida. There were (and still are) dozens of articles and news reports about

The Great Schlep, putting the message of Jewish support for Obamain front on tens of millions.

Exit polls of the Jewish Vote in the 2008 election: Obama - 78%ハMcCain 22%

Florida vote in the 2008 election: Obama 51% McCain 49%

Recommended