15 Kevin Cody - Measuring intranet engagement - Intranet Now

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Kevin Cody of Smallworlders talks about engagement benchmarking, at Intranet Now, the first and only independent intranet conference in the UK.

Citation preview

MEASURING INTRANET ENGAGEMENT

ANALYSE Engagement analysis &

benchmarking

OPTIMISE Optimising the performance of

the intranet

BUILDBuilding the

intranet

What we do

Who we do it for

We do it well

BACKGROUND

The Completeness Problem

The Overview Problem

The Comparison Problem

Consider a hypothetical fully engaged intranet. How would it look?

100% of userbase

visit the site every day

view 10 pages every day

perform each possible form of interaction once per visit

INTRANET ENGAGEMENT MODEL

100% of userbase

visit the site every day

view 10 pages every day

Interest

(visitor quantity)

(visit frequency)

(visit depth)

perform each possible form of interaction once per visit

Activity

ENGAGEMENT =

Interest x Activity

VISUALISINGENGAGEMENT

ZERO ENGAGEMENT

PARTIALENGAGEMENT

FULLENGAGEMENT

1 search =

1 like = 1 download=

1 comment

=

etc.

VISUALISINGINTEREST

100% of userbase

visit the site every day

view 10 pages every day

Interest

(visitor quantity)

(visit frequency)

(visit depth)

Interest

visitor quantity

visit frequency

visit depth

Partial Interest

50%

50%

50%

( 50% x 50% x 50% )

Interest =

12.5%

VISUALISINGACTIVITY

Activity

perform each possible form of interaction once per visit

100% ACTIVITY

perform each possible form of interaction once per visit

ACTIVITY = 50%

If each visitor performed half the number of possible interactions on each visit.

Interest= 12.5%Activity = 50%ENGAGEMENT =

6.25%

(compared to the total potential of the site)

ENGAGEMENT = 6.25%

Interest

Activity

100% Engagement

TO SUMMARISE

1. External Benchmarking

2: Internal Diagnosis

1. External Benchmarking

2: Internal Diagnosis

SizeXS (1-100), S (101-150), M (501-1000), L (1001-10000), XL (+10000)

Type of siteN (Content/News/Comms), C (Collaborative), T (Transactional), O (Other)

Types of interactions availableNumber of Passive types - Number of Active types - Number of Advocative types(e.g. 3-5-3)

1. External Benchmarking

2: Internal Diagnosis

COMMUNITYGet everyone interacting, sharing ideas and successes, and networking with colleagues across the Group.

INFORMATIONMake sure everyone has access to information that will help them do their job better, including research reports and data on the Group’s customer base and market landscape.

INSPIRATIONGive people a glimpse of future possibilities, through reports on new marketing innovations and emerging trends.

content

Social

The site is social and nothing else

Misconception of the goal of the site

content

Social

Content

Re-launch

August 2013

Oct/Nov 2012

Dec 2012 May 2013 Aug 2013

Jan 2013

Finally

Recommended