23
Print or digital ? Critical reading in the information era Yoram Eshet and Nitza Geri

Eshet & Geri Cnie 2008

  • Upload
    jjleggo

  • View
    370

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

Print or digital? Critical reading in the information era

Yoram Eshet and Nitza Geri

Page 2: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

Critical thinking in the information era: A survival skill for the information consumer

Page 3: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

The manipulative nature of news headlines

International Business Times, May, 19th, 2007

According to Dor (2001), most information in news resources is manipulative or biased.

Page 4: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

Manipulative Headlines

Page 5: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

The Onion: Dedicated to falcification & deception www.onion.com

Page 6: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

The problem: Are we able to consume information critically?

Chalked to death

Tel Aviv:

Air pollution 4 times

than allowed

Tel Aviv: Air pollution 3 times then recommended

Page 7: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

News representation taxonomy (Dor, 2001)

• “Objective” representation• Naïve bias• Wicked bias

Page 8: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

And why is it so important?“In the book 1984, humans are indoctrinated against their

will whereas in the modern era, they are being indoctrinated in a free will"

Slavoj Žižek (2002) Welcome to the Desert of the Real

Page 9: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

People, but especially youth are easily manipulated

(Eshet & Hamburger, 2004)

Page 10: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

Bombarded by information

• A constant increase in the exposure to digital information• Forecast: By 2020, 70% of information will be digital

(Romano, 2000).• Ambiguous findings concerning critical reading in a

digital format

Past and future use of print vs. digital information (after Romano, 2000)

0

10

2030

40

50

6070

80

90

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

Year

%

Digital

Print

Page 11: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

Print versus digital:What do we know?

• Reading: Slower in a digital text• Cognitive load: Higher in a digital text• Ownership: Lower in a digital text• Navigation: Disorientation problems in a digital text• General preferences: Short text : Digital. Long text: Print

Page 12: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

The research: Is there a difference in critical reading between print

and digital format?Participants• 40 high school students (20 males & 20 females)• 40 college students (20 males & 20 females)Print group• 20 high school students (10 males & 10 females)• 20 college students (10 males & 10 females)

Digital group• 20 high school students (10 males & 10 females)• 20 college students (10 males & 10 females)Tasks• Critical analysis of 5 news items (sport, politics, science, art, economy)• Each item appears in both print and digital formats.• Identify all manipulations made in news items• Write a critical reportGrading• Close similarity between the referees’ grades and the grades given by the authors

(Pearson Correlation range 0.809 to 0.997, all significant at the 0.01 level, two-tailed) suggests a high coherence of the evaluation criteria utilized in this research.

Page 13: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

Total (n=80)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Politics Science Economy Sport Art

Print

Digital

Findings: Print vs. digital Total sample

No significant influence of format for total participants group

Page 14: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

Total Females (n=40)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Politics Science Economy Sport Art

Print

Digital

Total Males (n=40)

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Politics Science Economy Sport Art

Print

Digital

Print vs. Digital: Gender influence

No significant influence of format in a gender level

Page 15: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

Print vs. digital: Age influenceTotal High School (n=40)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Politics Science Economy Sport Art

Print

Digital

Total College (n=40)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Politics Science Economy Sport Art

Print

Digital

High school: More critical in a digital format

College: More critical in a print format

Page 16: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

High school vs. college(regardless of format)

Total (n=80)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Politics Science Economy Sport Art

High School

college

Significant differences in critical reading

Page 17: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

Males vs. females(regardless of format)

Total (n=80)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Politics Science Economy Sport Art

Males

Females

Significant differences in critical reading

Page 18: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

The medium and the message (M. McLuhan):

Summary of major findings

Significant influence of age on performance:• High school students performed better in digital compared to print

formats.• College students performed better in print compared to digital

formats.

Significant differences in sub-groups (e.g. PH, PC, DH, DC)

Significant differences regardless of format:• Age• Gender

Page 19: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

Discussion: 3 perspectives of print vs. digital

• The usability perspective

• The cognitive perspective

• The information economics perspective

Page 20: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

The usability perspective

The usability principle: Users perform better in familiar and friendly environments

The generation gap: Youth are more used to digital & adults to print platforms

Page 21: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

The cognitive perspective

Youth perform better than adults in non-linear, branching hypertext environments

Eshet & Hamburger (2004)

Page 22: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

The information economics perspective

• The performance of users reflects the perceived value they assign to of information.

• Format affects the information’s perceived value and user performance.

Page 23: Eshet & Geri   Cnie  2008

We hope this talk has inspired you with some new ideas

THANKS