37
Cultural Research on the Internet What Web sites do you trust?

Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Cultural Research on the InternetWhat Web sites do you trust?

Page 2: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

What Are We Looking For?

• Credibility

• Accuracy

• Bias/Objectivity

• Timeliness

• Relevance

Page 3: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

CredibilityDo you trust the source

– Are they qualified?

– Can they be trusted?

– Will they stand behind the information?

O’Halloran, Thomas. Walter Cronkite on Television, 1976.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Walter_Cronkite_on_television_1976.jpg, Creative Commons License.

Page 4: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Credibility

Find out the person or organization that is responsible for the information. In this case – learn more about the US Conference of Catholic Bishops.

Page 5: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Credibility

Look for a Home page or “About Us” option. (Usually at top or bottom of the page.)

Page 6: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Credibility

Learn about the purpose of the organization and the web site. Make a decision – do you trust them, and are they qualified to provide the information that you’re seeking? (Yes – this site would be a trusted source of information on Quinceanera.)

Page 7: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Credibility

This is from a blog. Who is the writer (or writers), what are their qualifications, and can you trust them.

In this case, no information can be found about the owner of the Peppermint Paper blog. It is not considered a credible source.

Page 8: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Credibility

What about this Wikipedia article?…

Check the history of the article to see who wrote it…

Page 9: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Credibility

Recent contributors include Snowolf and FordPrefect42!

How would that look in your Works Cited list?

Purplegothicqueen. "Arctic Wolf". http://www.flickr.com/photos/purplegothicqueen/5273329499/sizes/z/in/photostream/ (Creative commons)

Page 10: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Credibility

Go directly to the source of the information!

But don’t forget to evaluate the quality of that source, too!

Page 11: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Credibility

What type of web site is it?. This is from the Library of Congress.

Government agencies are considered a credible source.

Page 12: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

CredibilityAddress includes:

Example What is it? Credible?

.com or .net www.cnn.comwww.angelfire.com/~joespage

Commercial or personal web sites.

Depends on the web site . Learn about the person/group responsible

.gov www.epa.govwww.loc.gov

Government Agencies

Yes

.edu www.psu.eduwww.si.edu

Educational Institutions

Yes (usually)Beware of student web sites.

.org www.americanheart.orgwww.wikipedia.orgwww.martinlutherking.org

Organizations Learn about the organization, first. Anybody can get a “.org” address.

What does the web site’s address tell you?

Page 13: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Credibility

Use Google’s advanced search to find specific types of web sites. (.org, .gov)

Page 14: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Credibility

In this example, you will only have government web sites in your search results list.

Page 15: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Credibility – What do you think?

http://www.irishcultureandcustoms.com/weddings/weddings.html

Page 16: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Credibility – What do you think?

What we know…

•Address is:

http://www.irishcultureandcustoms.com/weddings/weddings.html

•Who (person or organization) runs the web site?

•Found this at bottom right:

•Could not find out who

Russ Haggerty was.

Page 17: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Credibility – What do you think?

http://dublin.usembassy.gov/service/other-citizen-services/other-citizen-services/marriage-in-ireland.html

Page 18: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Credibility – What do you think?

What we know…

•Address is: http://dublin.usembassy.gov/service/other-citizen-services/other-citizen-services/marriage-in-

ireland.html

•Who (person or organization) runs the web site?

•US Embassy

•Is the US Embassy a credible source?

Page 19: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

CredibilityYou might need to dig for your information:

• Look for an About Us option.

• Go to the web page’s home page.

• Try modifying the address:

– If this is your web address: http://zapatopi.net/kelvin/kelvinmas/

– Take off the last “folder” or file so that it looks like this: http://zapatopi.net/kelvin/

– Repeat until you find information about originator! (http://zapatopi.net)

• Search the Internet for information about the person or organization.

Page 20: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Credibility

Creative commons license: “ Steiner, Peter. “On the internet, nobody knows you’re

a dog.” (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f8/Internet_dog.jpg)

Page 21: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Accuracy

Warning signs of doubtful accuracy:

• Do they provide references?

• Is the information consistent with other sources?

• Shocking (unbelievable) information?

• Professional appearance?

Page 22: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Accuracy

Some web sites provide false information as entertainment.

Page 23: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Accuracy

Some are Hoax web sites. They’re trying to fool you! (Maybe just for fun)

http://www.fvza.org/index.html

Page 24: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Accuracy

Professional appearance:•Easy or hard to read•Subtle use of color & graphics•Personal web pages•Advertisements

http://www.angelfire.com/mac/jelly/custom/trad.html

Page 25: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Bias/Objectivity

• Are all viewpoints covered?

• Fact or opinion?

• Purpose? To…

– Entertain

– Persuade or sell

– Inform

• Is it emotionally charged?

Page 26: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Bias / Objectivity

Two web sites with different opinions on an issue. •Both will probably give true information.•Both will provide opinions.

•Both will promote facts that support their view, and downplay or

not include facts that argue against their view.

http://www.protectmarriage.com/why-marriage-matters and http://www.marriageequality.org/

Page 27: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Bias / Objectivity

Two web sites about tattoos – one is a York Tattoo Parlor, one is a CDC “fact sheet”.What is the purpose of the tattoo parlor web page?What is the purpose of the CDC web page?Who is more likely to be biased?

Page 28: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Timeliness

• How old is the information?

• Can you tell how old it is?

• Could it be out-of date?

Page 29: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Timeliness

http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/tw/tw_5347.html

If changing information is important, then the date of your web site is important, too!

Page 30: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Timeliness

http://www.arthistory.upenn.edu//zoser/zoser.html

If the information most likely has not changed recently, then the date published/written is less important.

Page 31: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Timeliness is important when the information changes rapidly. (The more rapid change – the more important timeliness is!)

• Technology

• Science

• Medicine

• News events

Timeliness

Page 32: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Timeliness – What do you think?

http://www.reviewsonline.com/articles/890244000.HTM

Would you rush out to buy this ultrafast laptop?

Page 33: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Timeliness – What do you think?

You’ve been craving some old-fashioned apple pie – but this recipe is over 15 years old! (Is that a problem?)

Page 34: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Relevance

• Audience – who is the web site intended for?

• Is it too detailed or too vague?

• Coverage – does it cover the correct time period or geographic area?

• Does it make sense to use this web page?

Page 36: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

Relevance

Which is a more relevant source for information on the Bar Mitzvah tradition? The Bar Mitzvah/Bat Mitzvah page at Judaism 101, or Larry’s Flickr photostream of his Bar Mitzvah?

http://www.jewfaq.org/barmitz.htm and

http://www.flickr.com/photos/maidelba/477727941/

Page 37: Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research

What Are We Looking For?

• Credibility

• Accuracy

• Bias/Objectivity

• Timeliness

• Relevance