22
Upgrading the longest running microfiltration plant in the UK Peter Hillis, Water Treatment Technical Expert, UU Engineering

Trondheim June 2010

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Trondheim June 2010

Upgrading the longest

running microfiltration plant

in the UK

Peter Hillis, Water Treatment Technical Expert, UU

Engineering

Page 2: Trondheim June 2010

1

Outline

Background and History

Drivers for Change

Pilot Trials

Comparison Pilot vs. Full-Scale

Outcome

Page 3: Trondheim June 2010

2

Background and History

Lake District, NW England

59 Ml/d (15 MGD)

Cryptosporidium

Commissioned in late 1999

Longest running MF plant in

UK

This is a single source supply

– no alternatives

Page 4: Trondheim June 2010

3

Current Process Flow Diagram

Contact Tank

59 Ml/d

PACl

Clarifier

Tanker

2% Sludge

2 x 90M10C

Secondary Microfiltration

Primary Microfiltration

17 x 90M10CPre-screen

Page 5: Trondheim June 2010

4

Intake at Ennerdale Lake

Page 6: Trondheim June 2010

5

Ennerdale WTW

Page 7: Trondheim June 2010

6

Ennerdale WTW

Page 8: Trondheim June 2010

7

Primary Membrane Operation

Backwash Interval – 60 minutes

Backwash Duration – 2.5 minutes

Monthly caustic clean (1.25%)

Six monthly Peroxide clean

Sulphuric acid clean as required (pH2)

Zero Discharge Site – no sewer or discharge to the Lake

Page 9: Trondheim June 2010

8

Secondary Membrane Operation

Feed to secondary units is blend of

• primary backwash water (20 mg/l )

• clarifier decant (5 - 25 NTU)

Clarifier is fed from blend of

• secondary backwash water (100 - 200 mg/l)

• neutralized CIP solution

Lake water low in dissolved solids (50 µS/cm)

• coagulation sensitive to neutral CIP waste

Clarifier sludge 2%, 18 m³/day

• most difficult area, problems can shut plant

Page 10: Trondheim June 2010

9

Drivers for Change

Plant has operated successfully for over 10 years

Membrane life of PP >10 Years

Why change from something that works well?

Improved efficiency – power, chemicals, waste

Improved flexibility – operation

Improved waste treatment

Page 11: Trondheim June 2010

10

Historic Performance TMP and Flow

Page 12: Trondheim June 2010

11

Historic Performance Membrane Resistance

Page 13: Trondheim June 2010

12

Feed water quality 2000 to 2009

TOC (mg/l) Turbidity (NTU) Iron (ug/l)Manganese

(ug/l)

Aluminium

(ug/l)

Average 1.09 0.68 26.61 6.67 38.57

Max 4.22 3.99 166 39 245

Min 0.25 0.12 5 2 14.24

Std Dev 0.48 0.48 18.25 5.26 22.89

No 241 171 171 191 171

Page 14: Trondheim June 2010

13

Pilot Trials – Main Plant Comparison

Pilot Plant

PVdF Membrane

Siemens Memcor L10V

23m2 membrane area per module

Flux 73 lmh

Backwash Interval – 60 minutes

Backwash Volume – 17 l/module

Backwash Duration – 2.5 mins

Main Plant

PP Membrane

Siemens Memcor M10C

28m2 membrane area per module

Design Flux 41 lmh

Backwash Interval – 60 minutes

Backwash Volume – 55 l/module

Backwash Duration – 1.5 mins

Page 15: Trondheim June 2010

14

Pilot Plant Results

120565.001.40110244710/9/079

120566.401.5311024435/7/078

60563.351.466027341/6/077

60565.281.2497276627/3/076

60562.651.2158303520/2/075

60733.431.23103343016/1/074

60735.231.2314933396/12/063

60734.921.2513730422/10/062

60735.731.80114303421/9/061

Run

End

Run

Start

Run EndRun Start

BW Interval (Minutes)Flux

( lm-2h-1 )

ResistanceTMP

(kPa)

DaysStart

Date

Run #

Page 16: Trondheim June 2010

15

Pilot Plant Results

Page 17: Trondheim June 2010

16

Pilot Plant Results

Page 18: Trondheim June 2010

17

Comparison with Full-scale

Page 19: Trondheim June 2010

18

Identified Benefits

Reduced energy

Reduced chemical consumption

Simplified CIP – Hypochlorite only

Reduced volumes to thickener – estimated at 25% the volume

with 4 times solids loading improving operation of thickener

Page 20: Trondheim June 2010

19

One Step Beyond?

Page 21: Trondheim June 2010

20

Copy of Presentation

Email [email protected]

Download at LinkedIn.com

Page 22: Trondheim June 2010

21

Thank You