The Synchro Energy Project, beyond the Holographic Universe (by Fausto Intilla) - ebook

i libri di WUZ

intilla_syncro_stampa.indd 1intilla_syncro_stampa.indd 1 20-11-2007 18:02:0220-11-2007 18:02:02


Lampi di stampa

Fausto Intilla

The Synchro Energy Project,beyond the Holographic Universe

(traslation by Rosanna Branch)


On cover:“Li”

Under kind grant of:The TaoDeck, care of:

Acupuncture Clinic of Gainesville - Florida (USA)web site: http://www.taodeck.com

This book faithfully reproduces the text supplied by the author.

Copyright © 2007 Lampi di stampaVia Conservatorio, 30 – 20122 Milan - Italy

ISBN 978-88-488-0650-3e-mail: [email protected]

www.lampidistampa.it


Index

Foreword by Professor Massimiliano Chitvic (physicist). . . . . . 9

PART I – The Synchro Energy World . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

STARGATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

Do not open that door.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

All the poison that you do not need…. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

It is necessary to suffer before we can learn… . . . . . . . . . . . 25

The Creative Soul … . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

Subtle is the Lord… . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

A Universe of Information ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

The magic spoon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47

A ungrateful task.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

ARKHÈTYPON. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

Synchronisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

Virtual Realities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63

Dynamic and Potential Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74

THE SYNCHRO ENERGY EXPERIMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . 92

From subconscious nucleuses to Synchronicity. . . . . . . . . . 92

The SQUID Magnetometer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104

Meditation, a “remedy” for retrocausality? . . . . . . . . . . . 105


PART II – God=mc2 (Chosen readings from the original italian version: Dio=mc2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117

Between Good and Bad. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119

The Wondering Soul . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122

Beyond evolution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127

Errando discitur. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141

Tempus omnia medetur. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150

Denarius Nummus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155

The equations of evolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161

Human, too human . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165

The other side of Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172

Astronomy, brief chronologic history. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177

Vis Vitalis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181

Bibliography. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185


“Science is nothing but the search to discover unity in the wild variety of nature – or more exactly,

in the variety of our own experience”.JACOB BRONOWSKI



9

Foreword by Professor Massimiliano Chitvic (physicist).

This is a book on existence. It is about how existence appears in our eyes, broken into several fragments. It is upon the effort that the several small fragments which we call man make in order to piece unity together. It is also about the uselessness of such efforts. Forasmuch such fragmentation is only apparent, like some kind of Mayan veil.

Existence and unity pervade the entire universe; perhaps when we talk about universe it is like talking about existence. Existence presents itself before our eyes as energy (it is worth remembering the equivalence between mass-energy, according to which matter is nothing but matter in a particular form. E=mc2),and as such, it is found everywhere. Each thing is shaped by energy (Logos?) and re-turns to energy and fi nally is energy. Energy is the source, the source of information, encoded according to appropriate laws which we are slowly discovering. We should just think about all the information we can gather from the structure of the visible universe through the sun’s rays; or even, whenever possible, by measuring matter.

We have therefore realized a formula which is so dear to our fun-damental principles: God (energy) is everywhere, omnipotent and omniscient. The title of the book is therefore appropriate.

With regards to matter, more precisely energy in disguise, even we as human beings (and not only ourselves, but also all the living beings and anything which surrounds them) belong to existence, we are existence but have forgotten it.

All gnostic sects, had already come this conclusion in ancient times. The common trait of their doctrines was the existence of a per-sisting spark of divine energy in each human being which repeatedly


10

“attempts” to rejoin itself with the primigenial source. This divine spark is nothing but a name given by ancient men to energy. But we, as “modern” evolved and technologically advanced people, have forgotten this. In an unspecifi ed moment of the XVIII century we allowed materiality – which also belongs to existence – to close our minds to awareness. Since that time, our path has become more ardu-ous. We no longer hold the immediate perceptiveness of belonging to existence (as makind still possessed in the Middle Ages), we have a necessity to recover fragments one by one with great effort. And all that we are able to gain from this is simply a series of partial, secto-rial visions of unity. It is really worth remembering what Parmenide stated in his “Poem on Nature”: “It is essential that you learn about everything: the solid well-rounded heart of truth and the opinion of human beings in which there is no true certainty. But this you shall also learn, how all things that appear certainly are that way, being all part of each meaning”. According to Parmenide existence is not to be interpreted as a monolithic oneness, but as a whole which does not fi ght off or cancel out the multi-faceted but includes it in itself and guarantees as well as safeguards its reality. As a consequence, Parmenide believed that Existence is the true meaning of reality, the “heart of truth”, whilst things which appear, all phenomena are its manifestation in its content. The real meaning of things which ap-pear can only be gathered by understanding their relationship with existence and how existence has a concrete subsistence in its manifold appearance. Parmenide lays down an identity between terms which we no longer knew about.

As mentioned above, as human beings, we have forgotten to be part of the Everything, denying it (in several ways, even religiously) inasomuch as absurdly stating the void. By doing this we provide wrong assertions on the way things appear and the meaning for car-rying them out. This is the wrong consequence of the forgetfulness we mentioned before. On the other hand, we must not negate the experience of things and events but rather refute this erroneous vi-sion of experience, otherwise we push ourselves further from the Everything and create the image of a monstruous personage.

This is therefore what it means to recover various fragments that lead us towards Unity (fragments which only appear as such and due


11

to our western views of dividing the relationship between phylosophy and theology). This is the task that awaits us, whether we are aware of it or not. Intilla’s book wishes to go towards this direction.

The efforts that mankind makes in order to rewrite the lost Unity are amenable to scientifi c inquiry as well as the phylosophical one. But none of these two cases can reach its objective by operating in a sectorial way. It is essential to make an effort to overcome specialistic divisions.

Reductionism is a very comfortable method for solving problems, the problem is decomposed into several minor problems until a solu-tion to those is obtained. Moving from solution to solution it is then possible to reach the starting point. On the other hand, by following this the fundamental axiom which tells us that the Everything is above the sum of its parts is lost.

By working in watertight compartments, mankind only makes the situation worse; in fact there are no scientifi c theories which prove above any reasonable doubt, the participation of the Everything into each element. We can only “catch” here and there some vague “hints” (for example through quantum and relativistic mechanics) and by pausing and refl ecting on their meaning (at times forcing it) extrapolate some “clues”. But nothing more.

Not even the lately analysed GUT theories of Great Unifi cation, can “explain” the Universe in a single formula, or are able to help us in any way. Although they supply us with more coercive clues, they are still only clues. What happens when we turn to cosmology? We actually move from the bleakest desperation of absolute materialism to an enthusiasm for feeling that we have found our place in the Uni-verse. These are both completely wrong standings. Desperation be-cause all data available tells us that the Universe is destined towards thermodynamic death leading us along with it. It takes a hold on us so that the uselessness of our presence in the world becomes reality and we ask ourselves what the purpose for such frantic search is if everything is destined to end. Desperation because the materialistic interpretation tells us that we are the fruit of chance and we are here just because casual conditions that have always allowed us to be here have led us here.


12

Enthusiasm because such data, if interpreted with another key, tells us that the universe presents conditions that make it inevitable for “observators” to appear, namely intelligent beings able to carry out research on the universe and themselves.

Enthusiasm because the analysis of these conditions tells us that by varying any one of them in a slight way we may not exist and therefore our appearance in the cosmos was “programmed” in the DNA of the universe. Such contrasting positions, irreconcilable be-tween themselves are dependent upon the interpretation that wishes to provide the same estimative elements. As recently found, they are dependent on personal convictions of those who interpret therefore not objective.

Phylosophy doesn’t make this any easier. With its multi-faceted sides the two standings already stated above, which are essentially amenable to the currents of materialism, denying any participation of the Everything (as well as negating its actual existence) together with the ontology of the Everything, all becomes fi nalized towards the demonstration of the Everything and the comprehension of its manifestations. Various theologies and religious faiths do not con-tribute to making it all clear, as retreated in their own certainties, mutually excluding themselves, generate dogmas whose purpose is not to illuminate the walk of awareness of mankind but to control their consciousness.

But if we look carefully, we have some proof. Some individual proof. This is not a clue or opinion subject to interpretation but actual proof providing us with certainty. This proof is a theorem demonstrated by the logician Kurt Goedel (who in his Theorem of Incompleteness of 1949 astonished his friend and colleague Einstein by demonstrating that it was possible to travel through time if start-ing from the equations of General Relativity), demonstrating the existence of God. It is a God that is different from the one presented by all religious faiths and perhaps this is the reason why the theorem has been “forgotten”, studied only by specialist mathematicians (it is easy to think that if God exists – and God does exists according to the irreproachable demonstration of Goedel – as he speaks the language of mathematics).


13

This book appears to be enveloped in an Indian cosmological thought fog but I don’t know whether the author is aware of this.

According to Hindu thought, there is no room for irriducible dualism, any real opposition in the logic of opposites within which all our perceptions function.

Whether such constrast is spirit and matter, conscious and un-conscious, inactive or living, white or black, good or bad, etc. it is always about opposites between complementary and interdependent elements which exist only in relationship to the other.

The Universe, according to the Hindu thought, is speculation, a game of probability, possibilities which are not unique, that could be different, which is different in other dimensions, in other spaces (and which modern science discovers more and more each day). The Cos-mic Being incessantly imagines other Universes which exists on other levels with respect to the one we perceive. Even within the world we believe we know there are other worlds, different orders of dimen-sions and perception which give rise to different realities. Separate on certain levels, they do however remain connected to the others. Within the order of what can be perceived by us, there is no solution of continuity between the different levels of creation, between matter, life, thought and consciousness. There is nothing but differences in dimension, modality, moments and degrees.

According to the Hindu cosmology, there are no limits to the possibility of worlds contained within each.

Even at the level of human perception, the Hindu say that there is an endless amount of stars and planet worlds that can be comopared to ours, which include living beings that are similar to us and actually look like us in many different ways. The Earth and mankind do not constitute a single and isolated phenomenon.

In conclusion, I would briefl y like to talk about an issue which is very dear to me. A topic which in some way pervades and is found throughout Intilla’s book, like a note which accompanies from the beginning to the end a symphony of various issues united yet dis-tinct.

I refer to the infl uence of the psyche above matter or rather of their mutual infl uence, since psyche and matter are two aspects of a


14

single reality. It is a known fact that matter infl uences psyche; psyche is intended in the most restricted acceptation of the “personal psyche of man”. If we simply think about the moon and its effects on the tide which infl uence the mood of individuals (and not by chance, customs and popular traditions name such individuals “moody”). But psyche and matter both infl uence each other in a different way. It is the case of acausal coincidences or synchronisms. The theory of synchronicity is a theory developed by C.G.Jung in collaboration with Nobel prize winner W.Pauli (theory of the principle of exclu-sion which concerns the various orbitals that an electron can more or less occupy in an electronic cloud surrounding the nucleus of an atom). In a few words, some external events happen which precisely confi rm an internal psychological situation and vice versa. In order to clarify this point, I will make a personal example.

Several years, I walked along the roads of my city near the railway station. I had recently split up from the girl I was with at that time or more precisely, I had been left by her. I spent a long time not be-ing able to understand why she had made such a choice, falling into melancholy and later resentment.

But, as they say, time heals everything and slowly mends all the pain. On that day, I was refl ecting upon the ability of time to cure the wounds of the soul. I sat on a bench and deep inside I felt that the pain and resentment felt for such abandonment had gone and I said to myself:

“It has been a long time, F. What has happened is over and I no longer feel resentment towards you. Actually, I wish you all the best and that you may fi nd true happiness. Be at peace F.” At that precise moment, a white dove landed and perched near my feet.

The connection between the two events, my interior situation and the happening of such external happening is obvious.

Normally people tend to gather such situations but relegate them between bizzarre coincidences that every now and then happen to all of us without placing no importance to them and missing the opportunity to get in touch with the primiginial source of psychic life. With the Everything himself. In such lucky moments, we are able to realize that we are not isolated entities but we are part of an


15

Everything and that anything we say, do or think (yes: thought is creation) modifi es the universe in itself.

There is obviously another way in which the psyche infl uences matter, in a way which is more consonant to the mentality of the western world. I refer to an action consequent to a rational refl ex-ion.

A very banal example can be based on the decision of building a house, decision which heavily infl uences matter, transforming idle material into a complex structure yet infl uencing and transforming its surrounding environment. I know that the example is banal but the rational process implicated is identical to that of digging a well or declaring war to a State.

I will stop here, otherwise all the cues and refl extions deriving from the reading of Intilla’s book would lead me far, very far. But I do hope that whoever will read this book will do the same.

Intilla has given us the opportunity to refl ect and he has provided it in an intelligent way.

PROF.M.CHITVIC,CECINA,SEPTEMBER 2003.


16

“Dear Fausto,you should not apologize for any “crazy idea”; they are the only

things that move human knowledge forward. In my opinion, the most serious problem facing contemporary science is the arrogance of its practitioners,who seem incapable of saying two simple phrases “I don’t know” and “I was wrong”. But without the humility implied by these, it is impossible to learn something new. One can only rein-force what one thinks one already knows.

We are touched by your enthusiasm for our work (...). Although this topic continues to be regarded as controversial by most main-stream scientists, it does seem to be attracting a growing interest and respect, especially among younger people. Perhaps the paradigm is not as far from that long-predicted shift as we had thought (...).

Sincerely,Brenda DunnePEAR Laboratory ManagerPrinceton University,NJ.”


17

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I would like to thank Cinzia Turnaturi (technical operator at the Institute of Hygiene at the Policlinic University A. Gemelli of Rome) for helping me delve into, through her inspirational observations, some aspects related to the interaction which substists between psy-chic processes inherent to techniques of meditation and the Principle of Retrocausality (which is strictly linked, even in an implicit way, to the Jungian theory of Synchronicity hence “indirectly” to my theory of “Unconscious Nucleuses”).

Dear Readers,I would like to apologize if some of the mathematical “formulas/

equations” included in this volume do not include the classic algebric symbology (an example is the “ : ” symbol between numerator and denumerator, instead of the usual fraction stroke); such choice was partly made willingly for “technical” reasons.

FAUSTO INTILLA, CADENAZZO, SEPTEMBER, 2007.


18


PART I – The Synchro Energy World



21

STARGATE

“We are looking for something,that’s already found us”.

J.M.

Do not open that door...

In this moment in time, my thoughts are analysing a series of infi nite possible structures…I ask myself which will be followed to begin and bear its fruits. I see a staircase. At the top of this staircase is a door. What will be behind this door? I shall walk up…here is the door, here am I facing it.

I touch the handle. Who knows, will it be open or closed? All I need to do is lightly touch the handle to discover it…and there it is, the door begins to open…

The place where I fi nd myself is truly enchanting, maybe it is a good thing being here…even for just a short while, let’s say…a few minutes. One…two…three…four minutes…now would be better for me to return to the house, it is getting late. I will return tomorrow. I leave. I close the door and walk down the staircase.

And here I am the following day. The same staircase; the same door. I walk up the stairs. I am facing the door. Who knows, maybe today it will be open again, or maybe not? It will be enough to lightly touch the handle to discover it…and there it is, the door begins to open…

The place where I fi nd myself is still the same. I only stay for three minutes and then leave. I close the door and walk down the


22

stairs. I will return tomorrow morning. Time passes by…the follow-ing day…

Here again, here is the staircase and here is the door. I walk up the stairs. I am in front of the door and think: “It will most probably be open”. In a rather self-assured way, I touch the handle…and there it is, for the third consecutive time, the door was actually open. I am not at all surprised. Once again, I am in the same place. I stay here for about two minutes. Then I leave, close the door again and walk down the staircase, promising myself to return tomorrow.

The next day…Here is the usual staircase and the usual door. I start walking up

the stairs. “So, let’s see…today I must go to the barber’s, go to the post offi ce to send some letters, check my e-mail, return my mother’s oven dish…but anyhow, I’ll walk into this wonderful peaceful place of idyllic appearance”. There are only three steps to go and I will be at the door; I can already see myself across the threshold, inside that pleasant place”. I have the unconscious and nearly absolute certainty that in a few instances I will touch the handle and open that door, that nothing and nobody can stand in my way. I give a glimmer of a smile and in a rather decisive way, I lower the door handle throwing myself forward with an outburst and … strangely enough…the door is not opened and I nearly hit my head against it.

Once again, just as it often happens throughout one’s life (…or more lives), the last pieces of a simple puzzle do not seem to match with its own expectations. The logic of the Universe is far more com-plex. Each time that our expectations are transformed into some-thing more “solid”, that is, into mental structures which no longer allow for any kind of doubt, and that therefore defi ne a potential future as something not defi nitive, which no longer has potential, as it is nearly completely taken for granted; it is in that precise mo-ment, that all the wave functions that our system (body-mind-soul) has managed to previously collapse in our favour (therefore creating a “positive” reality), completely change direction to give space to a less favourable reality. Do you know what this means? It means that our expectations, our most deepest desires, our stupid fi rm believes and our stupid illusions…make our surrounding reality change in the


23

most unfavourable way! To give you a most trivial example, for what reason did the stock exchange start its slow and inexorable decline, exactly at the stroke of the year 2000? On the fi rst of January of the year 2000, investors’ exhilaration was at its highest point!

The expectations of million and millions of investors had already reached the highest point because everyone believed that an out of proportion growth in all the fi nancial markets (above all in the fi elds of technology and telecommunications). But for what reason do you believe that for two thousand years, all the religions in the world have been professing the same things? Someone about two thousand years ago, had noticed that the only way for mankind to be saved is to be without stupid illusions and desires; and this was a long time before all the world scientists “discovered” quantum mechanics changing their concept of reality.

This strange cosmic law, is relevant to all sides of the human sphere. Whoever fervently desires unconstrained richness, will never obtain it, whoever deeply desires a partner for life (true love, as they say), will never fi nd it!…and so on.

All the poison that you do not need…

The heart is a factory of desires, but they may only be realized if we are able to secretly hold them within; the moment that those desires emerge to the surface, and attack the brain, the potential to fulfi lling those desires disappears (and the only times when they are fulfi lled, there is a high price to be paid). But how is it possible (someone will surely ask) to safely keep in secret the desires of our own heart, hoping that these will come true, without making our “supreme organ”and our body go into motion to realize them? Well, I would answer the question in the following manner: there are two ways to bring our soul towards whatever we desire the most; the fi rst is to analyse all the “apparent data” that the reality in which we live (family environment, working environments, bars attended frequently, friends, relatives) is able to give us, by later using the brain to elaborate a plan which is completely rational so that our objective can be reached and that in the end, our body can carry it out. The second way is to lie down on a bed and let our body (including the


24

brain, obviously), absorb all the information that the entire cosmos is able to supply to us; the moment that our soul has decided which part of the earth it should transfer it to, we simply need to let our body and mind (rational thought) leave the bed together and follow it…without making any objections.

By using the fi rst method, you will certainly have about twenty per cent probability to fufi ll your dreams; by using the second, the probability is approximately seventy per cent.

The main point now is: nobody is able to know exactly what dreams, aspirations, greatest desires are hidden in their own uncoun-scious nucleus. Following our own soul, would therefore mean to walk towards potential events of which we cannot completely know (not even in the slightest way) the developments, whether positive or negative for the person himself or other people involved. In this case, what we would carry out, would exclusively mean to be an act of faith, without (as previously mentioned) knowing the effects. An ancient Chinese proverb says:“God punishes you when he lets you achieve your desires”.

Now, according to you, in which of the two cases would God try to punish us? In the fi rst case, where we exactly know our desires and manage to reach them, or in the second case, when we don’t exactly know what our desires, but fi nally (with a good seventy per cent of probability) will implicitly be revealed and therefore be offered on a silver dish? You hold the right answer.

If anyone believes that I have not been clear enough, I can add this: the fi rst method, based on “apparent data” (…misleading) and on the rational thought which around these takes shape, certainly does not create happiness of the soul (as I perhaps initially and er-roneously implied), but only the “physical” and partly psychic one. Instead, the second one, based on cosmic information and on the subconscious nucleus, could place the soul, if not under a state of “happiness”, in an environment in keeping with happiness, therefore more correlated with the human being under question.

I can already hear the voices of wise men admonishing…”Only a madman could abandon everything that he has built in many years of sacrifi ce, to go and die of hunger who knows where!”…”People who behave in such a way, sooner or later end up in psychiatric care!”…


25

”If God gave us the gift of a brain, maybe it is because every once in a while we should use it” …and so on.

Well, after all they are not so wrong. Whoever leaves the old path for the new one, knows what he leaves behind but does not know what he will fi nd, as an old saying goes. Normally, whoever con-stantly follows this proverb, will not be able to expect much from life. The Sacred Graal of …happiness, is only for the most fearless.

There are however those who are convinced that true revolution lies in normality; well, for some aspects it could also be true. But life, true life, the one that if we listen enough, we feel running through our veins with a pressing rythm, could be revealed as a reality made of comfort, routine, deliberation and Hegelian rationalism ? Which dreams could ever be realized in such reality; maybe those in which God punishes you once they are achieved? And the old wiseman, at this point answers: “Watch out guy, Nicholson teaches that only few people are able to fl y on the gowk nest without hurting them-selves”.

It is necessary to suffer before we can learn…

About a year ago, I met a girl who was a few years older than me; her father was of Romanian origin, whilst her mother had Serbian/Croatian roots. She was one metre seventy three cm of height, fi fty eight kg without shoes and clothes, brown hair, hazel eyes and a mind as sharp as a razor. The typical femme fatale of Slavic fascination, able to make anyone fall in love (including the idiot who is currently writing). Without going into details, in one way or another I was able to make her fall for me and within weeks I took all my rags to her house, and started living with Miss Universe.

At the beginning, things were going well, but each time she looked into my eyes and told me she loved me as well as said that she wanted to stay with me all her life (…and “beyond” this life), through good and bad, as the love that she nurtured for me (as she said) was nearly boundless, well each time she came out with such nonsense, I would always unfailingly feel a strange uneasiness in the solar plexus area, which travelled up towards my heart. It was as if each time she placed her eyes on me she absorbed part of my elan vital. That is when they


26

started, what she considered to be exclusively stupid paranoid fi ts and nothing else. I soon ended in a deep state of depression; I was ill and did not know who to blame for this strange and unjustifi able uneasiness…but now I know: I could only blame myself!

When we feel a strange uneasiness in the solar plexus area, it is necessary to interpret it as an alarm bell! Our subconscious at that moment in time (or the system body-mind-sould, if you prefer) has already fi ltered and elaborated all the cosmic information, which in itself has been able to defi ne in a subconscious level, a whole series of potential futures (that could therefore be reached), all unfavour-able to the stated person-victim’s expectations. Her parents had never been very open towards me, actually, I felt hatred and disdain to-wards me. They had never explicitly confi rmed their feelings towards me or made me understand this in other ways, but I felt it; each time I met them, the “tension” in the air was tangible. This matter kept on making me feel more and more oppressed; until one day I decided (just like any yankee that you can respect, ready to make justice alone and in no half-way measures), to break the ice and take the bull by its horns. I had an argument with her parents (this confl ict took place in the absence of my beloved one), and as a good self-taught psychologist, let all the bad come to the surface…

According to them, it was a simple cultural difference and edu-cational difference (according to these people, I was not suffi ciently educated for their little princess) and I did not represent to be the ideal man for their refi ned offspring.

The following day, I saw the woman who was supposed to have later been my future wife, Miss Universe. She looked in my eyes with obvious disdain and showing off her full pride she said: “This time you have really done it, how did you dare jumping on my parents in such a way? This is the last straw, I will let you know when you can come to collect your stuff. If you hadn’t argued with my parents, we would probably have got married and had children. Goodbye”. It was a reply which made be believe that there had been something else to it for some months but that she had obviously been afraid to loose her little puppy, always ready to satisfy all of her needs, she never had the courage to reveal. Everything happened, whilst I, like a perfect idiot, swayed in a sea of tears, begging her to think about it again


27

and forgive the great mistake I had made, according to her, by argu-ing with her parents. She didn’t even shed a tear. At that moment in time, I understood that I had spent a year of my life, with a merciless woman, totally cold, wretched and heartless.

A few days after our separation, I wrote her this letter: “Maybe I should not have desired your love so much; maybe I should not have desired your parents’ love so much and I should not have longed for a life that is so simple and balanced. By doing this, I have not done any-thing but lowering the wave functions towards the wrong direction, and the future which has arisen has been everything but favourable.

But how can a human being let go of a desire of love, just the mo-ment that he feels he has found it?

Maybe the secret is here. The spell lasts only while unaware of the I-WHERE-WHEN; the moment that our eyes are open and at the same time doors of perception, love, the spell, disappears in a twinkle of an eye. The meeting with the twin soul, the one that not everyone is lucky to fi nd through a lifetime, can only happen in a moment of great suffering (…or viceversa),where all the doors of perception are totally open…an instant in which time appears to crystalize, where the ticking of the clock seems to stop all of the sudden, it is like the transit between life and death…where silence reigns supreme, and in your own mind, in your own Universe, you can only hear a chorus of voices that always repeats the same line…Amazing Grace, a sweet melody that goes deep into your bones and makes you tremble and cry at the same time whilst joyous. In this precise moment, when the sky all of the sudden appears to be painting in red, blue, white and all of the other colours of life, we have the total awareness that the person by your side, will follow you for the rest of her earthly existance.

Life is like a painting of Pollock, that can be dug deeply, even in the chaos it is possible to fi nd some order, some logic of events, which as they follow, defi ne the life of each human being.

We’ll take a look at the last things that Miss Universe told me before pronouncing her last magic word that ended the spell:

”If you had not argued with my parents, we would have probably got married and we would have also had children…”. Well, now, with


28

the wisdom of hindsight, I laugh at it; but I can ensure you that at that time, I was so distraught that I would have actually apologized to her parents, in order to stand by her side. How blind, how foolish of me, how naive…with my eyes closed, blinded by the last fl ashes of passion, I was going to make the biggest mistake of my life! For-tunately, I opened my eyes and didn’t make that great mistake.

I will now analyze what would have happened if I had apologized to her parents. In the best of cases, they would have accepted my apology, still continued (and probably greatly) to nurture a hatred and disdain towards me. Miss Universe, on the other hand, would have also nurtured some sort of hatred towards me, at least for some time, until the tension between the two of us would have slowly died out. But how long could this state of things have carried on? This fake relationship, where her parents could only place their negative infl uence? Maybe the time to get married and bear a few children? Well, I feel that you may already know the answer. All your sins will soon fi nd you out. Wanting to take the bull by its horns and immedi-ately, I did nothing but accelerate the times and bring about our in-evitable separation; thus avoiding the most disastrous consequences (many of you know what a legal separation consists in, especially when children are involved).

There are some paths in the life of every human being, that our souls cannot avoid, for simple reason that they themselves actually “programmed” such paths!

A few months after our separation, in the period when I was starting to fi nd a certain psychological-physical state, I wrote to my analyst the following letter:

“Dear Doc. M, I am writing this letter, so that you can realize, how (after the events

have taken place) I see reality around me, therefore, as a consequence, you may be able to analyse in a most complete and objective way as pos-sible, the entire physical-psychological context that I have “regretfully” taken part in (I say regretfully in inverted commas, as I feel that every negative experience in life, must be seen and interpreted as a teaching, in order to improve each approach that any human being sooner or later is obliged to face, with all of life’s adversities).


29

You are a psychologist, and therefore will know more than I that man has needs and motivations which he is not aware of (Freud built his whole analytical system around this basic intuition). The point is that nobody knows what mankind’s “true” needs are. Freud himself changed his mind as many as three times on the nature of desires and instincts. Initially, he spoke about sexual and survival instincts; then he spoke of pleasure and aggressiveness; fi nally of a vital instinct and death instinct. From that time, psychotherapists, have always tried to comprehend mankind’s “true” needs.

For example, Rank emphasized the need for a strong and construc-tive will, Adler spoke of longing for power, Ferenczi of the need for love and acceptance (and maybe my case falls within this school/theory of psychotherapy…but only apparently, I must make this clear), Horney of the need for security, H.S. Sullivan of biological satisfaction and security, Fromm of the need for meaning, Perls of the need to grow and mature, Rogers of self-defence and self-improvement, Glasser of a need for love and self-respect, and so on. What we can fi nally deduce is that man is unaware of a few aspects of himself (that is his Shadow, to use a Junghian term); and beyond this, wanting to dig deeper, it seems clear and obvious that each of the main schools of psychotherapy, turn towards a different level of the “subconscious spectrum”. All these schools, therefore come to complementary conclusion. The psychologi-cal profi le of the girl I lived with for about a year, as you rightly pointed out during one of our sittings, is distinguished by a strong ambition towards everything that life in itself is able to offer us, but apart from this, is distinguished by a strong behaviour projective of negative quali-ties (such as snobbing, malice, false modesty, etc…).

All these projections of negative qualities, which have always char-acterized the nature of my ex-girlfriend, have always (obviously) been in confl ict with the projections which on the other hand characterize my nature; that is projections of a positive nature, such as kindness, strength, wisdom, etc… This forced interaction, between natures which are so different, that is, between me and my ex-girlfriend , infl uenced furthermore by the developments which were anything but positive in-teractions between me and my ex-girlfriend’s father (he himself was also dominated by a behaviour defi ned nearly exclusively of a dispro-portioned quantity of projections which where of a negative nature


30

– something rather unusual for a doctor - ; behaviour which he cannot be aware of as all this negative material has been by him dissociated, alienated, repudiated, thrown away, but that even though such poten-tial reserve, has always been in some kind of projections. The reason for his profi le-psychological behaviour towards society, which actually characterizes his daughter too, my ex girlfriend, I believe is partly due to all of life adversities which he had to face as a foreigner, in an alien land) could only have matured sooner or later in an inevitable separa-tion between the two of us.

The implausible hypothesis is that everything originates from, is everything that we see in other people or in the world’s only a projec-tion. In order to reabsorb or recover our projections we project our-selves completely onto the other object or person. In theory, it would be necessary to do the opposite of alienation, that is identify. As you will certainly know, the job of identifying with the woman chosen to be a life companion, this would have never taken place, as it is strongly against my nature. Such work, is solely achieved when there is an interest in psychoanalysing a determined subject for therapeutic purposes. What is most obsurd in all this, is that at the end, I was the one to come to you and not the opposite!

But at the end, everything balances out, the easy and the diffi cult blend, the high and the low lie side by side, the forward and backward follow one another. …there are no mountains without valleys, and those who try to eliminate the valley, will be forced to demolish the moun-tains. Those who say to want justice without its correlative, injustice, or a good government without a bad government, do not believe the great principle of the Universe, neither the nature of the whole of Crea-tion. Hatred of evil only reinforces evil, and the opposition reinforces whatever we go against. It is a law which is mathematically exact. The continuing denunciation of evil and of its emissaries does nothing but encourage its growth in the world, a truth revealed suffi ciently in the Gospels, but to which we obstinately stay deaf.

What my ex girlfriend and her parents should understand (but I strongly doubt that they will one day be able to do), is that moderate cynicism has always been a feature of people who have great culture and humanity. All the possibilities of authentic affection between hu-man beings depend on being able to accept and know an element of


31

unshakeable roguery, within ourselves and in the others. (It is a real shame, that such way of seeing reality, is a feature most exclusive to anglosaxon people; sentences like…son of a ….! and so on, in deter-mined contexts, can be meant as a compliment only in a city like New York or Los Angeles).

The strength of fanatism, no matter how “effective” may be, can always be bought at the price of unawareness, and whether one has a more or less good cause, invariably reveals to be destructive, as it operates against life: it denies the ambivalence of the natural world. “I could live in the nutshell, and believe myself to be the King of an end-less space, if it was not for some bad dreams” Shakespeare had seen correctly, it is really the bad dreams, or bad ambitions, that change the destiny of every human being (…and as a consequence that of entire mankind!) in the most unfavourable way one can imagine. Mine, for-tunately, is heading towards the right direction…the “dark forest” is now a vague memory of my past.

YOURS SINCERELY,

F.INTILLA

The Creative Soul …

In your opinion, what is inspiration? Who knows how many people in this moment in time, with a smile full of pride and self-confi dence, will remember that famous statement made by Edison ...but this is a book for learned people, so why write it?

Do you really want to know what inspiration is? Well, now I will reveal it to you.…Inspiration is the moment when your soul precedes your body, your mind! … It is the moment when you fi nd yourselves in front of a uncut stone with a chisel in your hand…facing a piece of paper with a pen in your hand…facing a canvas with a paintbrush in your hand…in front of a piano with your fi ngers on the keyboard….and there is no way in understanding how you managed to fi nd your-self there! An instance beforehand you were elsewhere, carrying out other tasks, and then, all of the sudden, you fi nd yourselves at the exact point where all the forces of the Universe fl ow to ensure that a


32

creative act takes place! Initially your mind is astonished, then asks the following questions: but what on earth am I doing here? Then, in the spur of a moment, the answer comes from above, and your hands, just like magic, your hands begin to move uncessantly, according to schemes belonging to a Divine logic, chaotic, irrational…and in that precise instance, each awareness of I-Where-When disappears into thin air! Each sense of identity is lost, a shattering energy takes over your entire body, and you become the painting, the music, the stone, love…you are the entire Universe, you are God!

Carmina Burana……….introduction……….

Ambition is a synonim of desire, and desires as we previously discussed,you know where they take you. It is essential to abandon every stupid illusion, every stupid desire in order to access the doors to infi nity! To be able to…not observe…but being, the Aleph…the Omega, a nail, a tree, a planet, a star! To be able to see Eternity in an hour, the Universe in a Grain of Sand. Yet, it is so simple, to clear the doors of perception, it is enough by carrying out a simple act of faith. Blake had seen righteously; and walking on his footsteps, even Huxley,Grof,Castaneda and many others.

Stargate is the magic word…whoever passes at least once in their lifetimes this threshold, will no longer see reality as he always per-ceived it to be…but will see it as it truly is: infi nite, spectral, without space nor time.

Subtle is the Lord…

Let’s stay for a short time on the concept of love. How many of you will have heard at least once in their lifetimes, from friends, rela-tives or even their own parents, the following idiocy? If you never leave your home, you will never be able to meet your soulmate!” Well, this is the biggest lie, the biggest idiocy which millions and mil-lions of people believe in, and unfortunately, their sentimental sphere takes shape around, taking the most unfavourable and unhealthy directions which a poor human soul could ever follow in the course of a lifetime (…or more lives!). Believe me.


33

Nobody can escape their own destiny, nobody can escape from synchronous mechanisms (and therefore apparently casual…but only apparently, to clearly say) of the Universe (…Jung teaches) nobody can escape from God’s power ! But it is essential that I give you a banal example, by telling you a purely fi ctitious story (even though I would not be surprised if it had actually happened!):

Jack was a thirty year old man, tall, robust, fascinating and was a Manhattan broker. He lived a perfect life of a bachelor and lived in a beautiful loft in Long Island, in Queens. He had a Chevrolet Corvette and a substantial bank account. His working day normally started at 7.30 AM, with a French toast, warmed up in the microwave oven, a decilitre of boiling coffee sweetened with four teaspoons of sugar. At 8.45 A.M. his arse was already sat on a comfortable chair covered in material, about twenty metres of height from the still humid and totally shadowed fl oor of Wall Street, in the middle of millions of cubic metres of cement, waiting for the New York Stock exchange bell to ring at exactly 9.00 to mark the start of the fi nancial day. After the hell of the fi rst four hours of exchange, when normally the shares reach the maximum daily peaks, there was the usual lunch break that consisted of a still smoky hot-dog buried under a decilitre of ketchup, mustard and french fries, all ingurgitated in a straight posture, in the corner between Broadway and Pine Street. Another small sacrifi ce between two and four PM and then, at the end of the trading day, the usual beer in Greenwich with the same idiots, who after having lost the usual ten high denomination banknot with some trashy share, couldn’t wait to curse and talk badly about Merryl’s analysts.

Finally, back to the home, sweet home, where there are just the last unpaid bills waiting for him, a few leftovers in the fridge and a few messages on the answer machine left by one of the latest bitches, look-ing for a chicken to pluck…and maybe for life. He wasn’t at all out of women, maybe he had too many. And fi nally there was the week-end, which normally, when he was free from a tryst, spent some hours with his parents in a small house in Woodside, discussing the same old rub-bish with his father regarding the golden years of the Giants as well as the future of the Superbowl.

In theory, Jack had everything…a beautiful loft in the Sunnyside,


34

a nice car, a lot of money to squander and a lot of charming which he did not have to go after to bring them to bed. They all wanted the same thing anyway; his money, and Jack really had a lot of it.

But although he had so much, Jack still missed something. Some-thing that he could have never have bought, not even with all the gold in the world, something that as time passed, he had already stopped believing in, but that at the same time, left him with an open wound which helped him carry on day after day, in a state of depression getting deeper by the day. This something is generally expressed with a simple four letter word: LOVE.

It was this that Jack missed, love…true love, the deep one, honest, warm, sincere…a perfect blend between him and an ideal companion for life, but the good Lord, did not appear to be listening to call for his help. [Let’s consider that during the times of great psychic suffering, normally the “doors of perception” are much more “open” than usual, that is, than when a person is enjoying some kind of psychic-physical balance].

A little bit before arriving home, he stopped the car in front of a drug-store. His intention was to go in and buy the usual anti-de-pressants. He turned the key and the engine of his powerful Chevro-let Corvette of an amaranth red colour, stopped to switch its thermic energy into useful mechanic work. He sighed with his eyes placed on the steering wheel, then slowly lifted up his face full of sadness, until his visual ray was perfectly horizontal, allowing him therefore to read without impediment, the writing in block capitals, printed on the rear window of the car parked directly in front of his:

CALIFORNIA DREAMIN’.At that moment in time, Jack, saw all of his life in the twinkling of

an eye; from that time, he started asking himself a series of endless questions:”What is the meaning of all this?, I have everything, just everything…but in reality, I have nothing, nothing at all…

The great, magnifi c, omnipotent Jack, Jackass…I have nothing at all! My life is empty, stupid, insignifi cant. But what on earth am I doing here? Fuck it…can you hear me God? Fuck it, fuck it, fuck it again!” He looked at the drug-store entrance and started to observe his hands. He stopped observing his hands and stared at the writing on the rear window of the car in front of him…he deeply stared at it for a few sec-


35

onds, then, suddenly, he brought his right hand on the ignition key and switched on the engine. He left the car park and a few blocks away he took the 495th street East direction; about seven km later, he took the 678th direction South. Approximately twelve km later south direction, the 678th could only in one direction…to the Kennedy Airport!…and Jack wanted to go right there! He had nothing with him, apart from his woollen coat, passport, a pair of shades; and his MasterCard with a credit limit of one hundred and twenty thousand dollars.

He reached Kennedy Airport about thirty minutes later, parked his car in a no parking area and in a few minutes found himself in a long series of check-ins connected to a multitude of airline companies. The fi rst thing he did, was to fi nd out about the departure time of the fi rst fl ight to…Los Angeles! Miraculously, he found a place on the fi rst fl ight which was going to leave within two hours. He purchase a single ticked, sat between the other travellers awaiting boarding time.

Four hours later, he was standing facing the city of Los Angeles.In his pocket he had about seventy dollars cash; he took a taxi and

asked to be left in a Travelodge in the area of Venice Beach; luckily, he immediately found a room . It was eleven pm exactly on a Thursday at the beginning of September; a day that Jack would have remembered for the rest of his life. He took off his woollen coat and comfortably lied on his bed. He took a deep breath with a semi-open mouth, crossed his hands on his chest and closed his eyes. He was exhausted. He thought about his job in New York, aware that on his return…if he would ever return…the bone, someone would have already been caught by someone else.

In any case, he was not having second thoughts, no doubt or worry of any kind…because deep in his heart, he knew he had done the right thing; Jack, in that precise instant, knew that he was the right person, in the right place and at the right time!

Something not well defi ned, in his mind, kept on reassuring him trying to convince him more and more, that whatever he had done in the latest few hours, belonged to some sort of Divine picture. It had to be done, full stop!

He therefore started wandering on foot or by bike the streets of Los Angeles, without a destination, without projects for the future, feeling


36

like a “luxury” vagabond; with the money that he had saved, he could easily live in that way for about six or seven years. In the fi rst days, he worried about transferring his correspondence for sickness and ac-cident insurance to the Travelodge where he was staying. During the fi rst days, he often called his parents who were in vain trying to alleviate their anger and desperation…he had really made a big mistake, and he was well aware of it. But he was also aware, deep in his heart, of another thing; that is that despite the pain he had caused his parents with his crazy actions, in any case, he would have never gone back on his footsteps.

With the passing of the months, his phone calls to his parents in New

York became rarer and rarer. Jack limited himself to sending a postcard once in a while, trying to reassure them on his perfect health. When he did not walk along Main Street or on Santa Monica Blvd, he spent his days crouched somewhere on the enchanting Venice beach, reading novels by Asimov or Clark; he had always loved science fi ction. The fi rst winter for Jack, was not so bad as he had initially imagined…when it was too cold, instead of wondering like a dog around Venice, he stayed in his Travelodge room, reading or listening to old Garth Brooks, John Denver, Beach Boys, Doors songs…he loved country music, but he also loved the west coast music of the seventies…years when, according to what his father told him, taking a girl to sleep was as easy as drinking a beer at the bar.

Just before the beginning of summer, Jack started to feel terribly sad and dispirited, even more than he had felt in New York, a few hours before he had headed towards Los Angeles. In his mind, he had started to feel a reasonable doubt about his improvised, sudden and irrational departure from New York, where he had left without notice to anyone or anything, and even left a safe one hundred thousand dollars a year job. But it was useless crying over spilt milk, it was really useless and he had come to accept this. He had left with the hope, principally fed by that singular event*1 (which he felt to be a real sign of destiny) from

*1 Singular and surrounded by symbolism only for him obviously, that is from his point of view, strictly subjective and correlated to the context-situation where in that situation he found himself to be.


37

the writing on the car in front of the drug-store where he was going to walk in, to meet his soulmate; but unfortunately, during his fi rst seven months of stay in Los Angeles, he did not have the pleasure of meeting not even one woman, who could have ever mirrored the characteristics of a potential soul mate.

He was fully aware of his new image; he was conscious of the fact that in the eyes of any woman or girl he might have met and got to know, he would have uniquely appeared as a looser. He looked just like someone who was rather early, queueing up in front of the sad sign of the Salvation Army with many others begging for soup and a piece of bread. With the passing of time, he was nearly completely convinced that no mentally fi t woman would have ever accepted starting a sen-timental relationship with him, at least until he would have shown a minimum interest in fi nding a new job. The point was that he was lack-ing the motivation to fi nd a new job. And such motivation, that is, the will to want to return to fi ght for a dignifi ed life, he was convinced he could uniquely acquire again with the support, the understanding and unconditional love of a mate willing to follow him through good and bad. Jack was therefore fi nding himself stuck in a rut, and this was preventing him from deciding which way to go. He was in a most absurd situation, from which he did not know how to escape. Returning to New York would have been useless; it was in his mind that something surely had to happen, he was fully aware of this, but he did not know how to extirpate it. What had initially appeared to be a sign of destiny (the writing on the car: California Dreamin’) now seemed like a trick, a hoax carried out by the Almighty.

July started with days where the temperature at approximately two in the afternoon rose up to thirty/thirty-two degrees Celsius; and it was during one of those days that Jack, still more and more de-pressed and without any motivation to continue to live, decided to take off for the last journey in his life. He went out at about nine in the morning, leaving his room in the Travelodge and headed towards the Venice Boardwalk; along the journey which separated his Motel from Venice Beach, he walked in front of a small liquor store. He carried on for a few metres and then suddenly stopped; made sure (in a positive way) that he had his ID card, he turned around with


38

decisive steps walked once more a few meters which divided him from the entrance of that store. He placed his hand on the handle of that glass door and walked in without hesitation. Two young Mexican boys looked at him in a rather detached, neutral way; Jack bought a bottle of whiskey and left that small store, once again walking along the beach of Venice.

Fifteen minutes later he reached the Boardwalk of Venice; he walked for another ten minutes heading south, between only a few people of still tired faces and then stopped in front of the entrance of another store. This time it wasn’t a liquor store, neither a drug-store where he could have purchased some anti-depressants. He walked in, placed his paper bag with the drink he had previously purchased on a narrow counter covered by a luminous white fi lm.

For some time, he stared person standing on the other side of the counter, a tall and robust man of around forty years of age and then came out with a ridiculous utterance: “I … have a problem”, he said in a rather bland way. The only reply that the guy over the counter could have ever given, which obviously didn’t take long to reach his ears, was the following: “Friend, everyone has problems in Los An-geles”. Jack smiled with woeful and lost eyes and lost in his reply continued: “…I need a wetsuit and a surfboard, only for today…”

About twenty minutes later, Jack placed next to him the surfboard he had just hired, a big paper bag where he had placed his Whiskey and the wetsuit he had just hired, and fi nally placed his bottom on the still humid sand of Venice Beach. He lit a cigarette and started contemplat-ing the ocean; then he looked around to ascertain that no policemen or other people were around to annoy him with some “proper citizen” observation, he took out his Jack Daniels bottle that he had in his big bag and opened it still leaving it in the small paper bag that had been sold in.

Another six puffs of cigarettes , lit out the cigarette in the sand and started to sip the whiskey. Within an hour, Jack had fi nished the whole bottle. Already completely drunk, with his mind totally blurred as well as with a few hallucinatory sign, he took his surfboard and stood up staggering. In that precise moment, a guy with blond hair walked


39

by, and with a sneering smile, he gave him the following advice:”Hey friend, if I were you, you would not go out with that fossil *2”.

Jack did not even understand the simple words of that young guy; he was totally out that he only heart some kind of echo that he could not understand where they came from, and maybe he did not even notice the shape of the boy passing him by. A few instances later, he found himself in icy waters and fortunately only slightly moved by the Pacifi c. All of his memories ended there, in the ocean waves, a few twenty metres from the fi ne yet already wet sand of Venice Beach.

Sixteen hours later…When Jack opened his eyes, he observed the walls of the room

where he was lying and then the bed where he had comfortably been lying down, guessing that he was in a hospital room.

Undoubtedly, someone, sixteen hours before, having noticed his state, had been able to tear him from the icy waters of the Pacifi c.

Jack was still alive, but in that moment he did not know whether to be happy about it or whether he wanted to cry. The only thing that he kept on asking himself was the reason why God had saved him.

He stayed in that room, under strict surveillance, for another six hours, than at about seven in the evening a nurse asked him whether he wanted to eat in his room or on the ground fl oor in the canteen.

Jack decided to go to the canteen for his dinner. He wore a jogging suit that the hospital had kindly offered, he was accompanied by the nurse to the ground fl oor to the entrance of the canteen. At that time, the nurse left him and he walked in without hesitation in an enormous room mainly fi lled with patients, as well as the hospital personnel, all sat at tables of six-eight people and busy eating the fi rst dish of their evening meal. Jack went to get his food to the counter close to the kitchen area, and went to sit down in one of the last free places left between the twenty or so tables that covered at least two thirds

*2 The guy who had hired him the surfboard, had given him an old wodden Bear surfboard (this doesn’t mean that Bear boards are considered to be “worthless” but simply that after thirty years, any board of any brand should no longer be in the water but in a museum such as the Surf Museum of Santa Cruz,CA).


40

of the room entire area. In front of him, there was still miraculously a free place.

He started placing food in his mouth and slowly chewing the fi rst bites of meat, with the look of who has just lost his whole family in a plane accident. At that time, about twenty metres away, a nurse walked through the canteen door pushing a wheelchair where a beauti-ful girl of about thirty years of age was sitting. She had long, straight, silky blond hair; immediately the nurse looked at the free space op-posite Jack and started talking to the girl in the wheelchair.

“Look Miss Dunne, I think I can see a free place over there, near that guy with a blue jogging suit” [Jack]. Miss Dunne, placed a hand on her hair and then replied: ”Mmm…from far away he appears to be a nice guy; I bet he won’t even wait a minute before he starts showing off his entire Ego in the hope to appear friendly and interesting…oh God, I already feel assaulted by boredome even before I sit at that table”.

The nurse smiled and accompanied to the empty place opposite Jack; she moved the chair and placed the wheelchair in its place, then headed towards the kitchen counter for her fi rst dish. They both greeted each other with a hushed “Hallo”; Jack gave a faint smile and then immediately became serious, glancing at his dish and every once in a while observing in a faded way the rest of the world through the windows of the canteen. After a few minutes, the nurse returned to their table and placed a tray with the fi rst dish in front of the lady with the golden hair.

Once again, Jack gave her a faint smile and once again used his vocal cords.

“Enjoy your meal!” he said.She thanked him with a semi-smile and then started eating. He really liked that woman, the energy seemed to emanate, she

appeared to be positive. And the incredible thing for Jack was that she did not even appear to be stupid; actually, even though they hadn’t even started a real dialogue, she appeared to be a rather intelligent and well-educated woman. It was as if his sixth sense, was making him understand that with that woman, sat by pure chance opposite him, would have been able to talk about anything. Without even introduc-ing herself; Ms Catherine Dunne, stared at Jack for an instant and


41

then said: “Look, God is really enjoying himself seeing you so down and dispirited” He then answered: “Mmm…I did not believe God was so cruel.”.And she replied:”Oh…he is crueller than you can ever imagine”, she put forward her right arm towards him and introduced herself with a bright smile: “Hallo, my name is Catherine…Catherine Dunne”. Jack shook her hand and introduced himself as well:”Jack…Jack Caster… like the general”.

Jack and Catherine sat at that table for about four hours, as if a mysterious power had forced them do carry out a “forced dialogue” but at the same time was terribly harmonious and reassuring for both. At about midnight, Jack took Catherine to the entrance of her room, waved goodbye and wished her a good night sleep with a smile and a handshake. He then returned to his room, went to bed, but was un-able to sleep the whole night. Even Catherine that night was unable to sleep.

The following morning, the two saw each other again in the can-teen, this time for breakfast. They both sat at the same table, opposite each other, and the moment their eyes met again, they both under-stood that the would have spent a lot, actually an immense amount of time, together.Jack had fi nally found the woman of his life.

The teaching that we can deduct from this tear-jerking story with surreal contours, is that nothing happens by chance.

All the events, including those that appear to be more casual and thus without intrinsicly appearing meaning, belong to a Devine Plan that cannot be deciphered in any way by a common human mind. Even the most tragic and sad events belong to the Divine Plan; it is only after the Bad that you can reach the Good and vice versa! Lao Tzu said:

Is there a difference between the yes and no? Is there a difference between the good and the bad? Should I fear what others fear? Foolish! To have and not to have together emerge The simple and the diffi cult come to completion The long and the short balance themselves out


42

The tall and the small support each other The forwards and the backwards follow each other.*3

But let’s not go too deep for now, in this kind of refl ection. In the brief story that I told, it is possible to easily notice in what

way some cases it is possible to notice true synchronism. In this spe-cifi c case (just like in many others), both people described (Jack and Catherine) were not even lightly touched by the minimum intention to want to meet (Catherine would have actually preferred to sitting elsewhere, as she thought she may have had to interact with, in her opinion, a disagreeable person). Their minds, before their bodies met, were clear from any kind of expectation or desire towards who they were going to meet (Catherine was going to meet Jack and vice versa). In this case, it is possible to speak about true “external forces” which pushed the bodies (and later the minds) of our two friendly people to interact with each other. Catherine was lead towards Jack’s table by a simple choice of the nurse who nearly obliged her to do so, dictated by the conditions of the environment in that precise moment (in fact, the place in front of Jack, was one of the few places left to be identifi ed by the visual fi eld by the nurse from that point in the room!). As far as Jack was concerned, he had no other choice but to stay there. Even his situation was a totally obliged choice and the reasons are the following:

a) The canteen was rather crowded and therefore would have found another place with diffi culty (even if in his mind he might have thought about moving elsewhere) and he was fully aware of this. In this case the action of “external forces” was determining.

b) For a simple reason of respect and background, he would have hardly moved from that chair in the moment that someone was go-ing to sit opposite him. In this case it was a determining action of an “internal force”, related to the “highest” functions of his psychic sphere, that themselves govern all the processes of behaviour.

c)The woman who had sat in front of him, was rather attractive; she actually mirrored the rules of physical beauty that he found con-

*3 Lao Tzu ,”Tao Te Ching”, Milan (Italy), Mondadori,1978


43

genial. Someone could now erroneously think that the fascinating aspects of this woman could be intended to be a kind of “external force” in comparison to poor Jack; well this is absolutely false. It was the most primordial Jack’s impulses, that is those principally linked to his libido, to determine a kind of strength able to keep him fi rmly attached to that chair. Even in this case, therefore, it was “internal powers” to determine the action.

When things must happen, they will surely happen. Full stop. Speaking about subjective will, is always highly aleatory.

“We are drawn by fate towards what we refuse to get nearer to by walking with our heads erect”.

CARL GUSTAV JUNG

In “Introduction to Tantra: A Vision of Totality”, there is a beau-tiful consideration regarding the way, at an Ego level, our subcon-scious interacts with other Bands levels (biosocial, existential and transpersonal) which defi ne the entire spectrum. Acording to the Lama Yeshe :

”Our Ego(...) the neurotic mind which grabs hold of a solid sense of personal identity in order to fi nd a support, is extremely powerful, and will fi ght against any vision that could threaten his security. It is deeply upset by the possibility that the self, just like any other thing, could sim-ply be a fi gment of the conceptual thought. Therefore, we must expect enormous resistance when we meditate upon the non-existing autonomy of the Self. It is a natural thing, is simply consists in our our profoundly radicated Ego which fi ghts against his own destruction”.

Making a few hypothesis, more than simple considerations, on the nature of the various Bands-levels which defi ne the entire spectrum of our subconscious and the way the interact between each other, we can easily reach the conclusion that the lately analysed (Bands-levels and relating mutual interactions) determine psychic status of the subject under discussion and as a consequence the conformation of the territory where it can be born or the opposite, each singular synchronistic event.

It is therefore essential to be predisposed so that a synchronistic


44

event can be triggered off within our psycho-physical sphere and therefore head towards a determined type of evolution whether posi-tive or negative. Each psychic-physical status however, prearranges a determined synchronistic event; we are never immune therefore to synchronisms, as even in them, there is some kind of hierarchical event. We start with the simplest form of synchronism, for example the one able to change a boring day into a much happier and interest-ing day, perhaps after a...”totally casual”...meeting with an old friend at the market, a friend that we have not seen for a long time; up to the most complex synchronism able to change, sometimes, the whole path of our lives. (such as for example, what sparks the phenomenon of falling in love).

A Universe of Information ...

In Arkhétypon, I fi rmly supported the idea that the fundamental constituent of energy is Information.

From this consideration, I deduced some even more important ideas; that is:

.Whatever physical entity (organic or inorganic) carefully con-sidered in this Universe, apart from representing a complex form of energy (energy at a “solid state”), represents also a complex kind of Information, that I have named Potential Information.

. All the dispersive kinds of energy (such as for example gas or the smoke of a cigarette), even considered with diffi culty, consist in billions and billions of atoms, and each atom is to be considered to be a complex form of Information.

. Any subatomic particle, is itself to be considered as a complex form of Information.

. The photons, that is the quantum of energy, because lacking in mass and therefore imponderable, represent the smallest complex form of information known by mankind.

At this point, someone could easily make the mistake of believ-ing that the entire Universe mainly consists in potential information. Well, you are wrong. Things are not like this at all. There is another kind of information, which I have denominated dynamic informa-


45

tion, and that in turn represents the fundamental constituent of the following “parts” of the Universe; that is:

_-the collective subconscious according to Jung;_-every singular thought that takes shape within a human

brain. _-every singular thought that takes shape within the a non-human

brain. _-every word, phrase or discourse accomplished meaning pro-

nounced by a human being. If it takes place with one or more human beings (or machines, robots, computers, etc…) able to assimilate even just a small percentage of such information, we will talk of active dynamic information; whilst in the absence of human beings or “in-telligent machines”, we will talk of non-active dynamic information. Such dynamic information, non-active, in my opinion is able to join with the collective subconscious in accordance with Jung.

The same thing goes for each word, phrase or discourse at accom-plished meaning which is transmitted via methods of communica-tions known to all of us (books, television, radio,etc...). In order to talk about active dynamic information, it is necessary to read and understand at least the slightly, whatever is written in a book, or what is said on television, on the radio, etc. . .

Non-active dynamic information included in a book, whether this is never read by anyone, is anyhow not able to link to the collective subconscious...or at least I don’t believe it is…well, don’t ask me too much…even my intelligence has a limit!

To make you understand in the best possible way the concept of dynamic information, it is perhaps better to give you a rather banal example of how it operates within the Universe. We therefore remain with our feet on the ground and simply observe what happens the moment we take a book into our hands and begin to read it. If it consists in a scientifi c paper, each single concept expressed in the book, the moment that it is comprehended by us thus assimilated, constitutes in our mind a certain number of bits of information. What we can assume from this consideration, is that the more the quantity of information increases within our cranium, and the more


46

the energy available at our brain’s disposal.. This is for the simple fact that information and energy represent the same thing!

Speaking of information or speaking of energy, means talking about the same exact thing! It consists in a pure and simple dichot-omy, comparable to that supported by Einstein the moment he dis-covered that mass and energy are exactly the same thing, because mass is nothing but a complex form of energy. Nowadays, scientists have fi nally understood that energy itself is nothing but a complex form of information!

Nowadays, physicists speak of information, codifi ed by an atom of any element; in a not very distant future, physicists will talk about how much information constitutes, represents, a determined element. We will therefore say that a Joule of energy (or an electron Volt of en-ergy, eV) equals to a total amount of bits of information. Every hu-man being, is therefore to be considered as a complex form of energy; this means that he is constituted by a certain quantity of potential information (body) and a certain amount of dynamic information (mind). In Arkhétypon, I also gave the name to the system which takes shape from these two types of information (potential and dy-namic), and called it : Information of syntony. I then referred to a par-ticular structure of the human mind, saying: “Only a mind that works in an analogue way is able to extract from the surrounding environment, constituted by the collective subconscious (dinamic information) and from any type of physical entity (potential information), the highest quantity of information of syntony (potential+dynamic), tolerable by a common human brain (or any human body, providing that it is not only our higher organ which captures such information…)”.

We have therefore just established that the quantity of energy which constitutes the mind of a human being is comparable to the quantity of information (or bit of memory) of which such mind consists in. In conclusion, we can say that the quantity of energy that constitutes a human body, is incremental in the following two ways:

The fi rst, is extracting as much information as possible (with edu-cation and learning in any fi eld, whether scientifi c, political, military, etc…), in order to increase our own dynamic information. The sec-


47

ond however, is to increase the potential of our own physical capaci-ties (for example by practicing sport, body building) so as to increase our own potential information. Increasing our own muscle mass, means to increment our muscular energy (don’t forget that mass and energy are exactly the same thing), which defi nitely means increasing our own potential muscular information. Having said something like this appears to be something ridiculous, but I ensure you that this is the actual reality of things. A good energetic level, is therefore ac-quired, the moment when we contemporaneously increase potential information as well as dynamic information.

The magic spoon

One of the most sensational results of the General Theory of Relativity, is that similarly to heavy masses, whatever forecast based on the Euclidean geometry , is to be considered completely unre-liable. It was from this important discovery that they reached the idea of a curved space. It has now been known for some time, that no “gravitational glue” *4 exists (as wrongfully stated at the time by Newton and Keplero) between the stars and planets populating our Universe.

The Earth does not rotate around the Sun due to a gravitational effect which has not yet been identifi ed, but goes round it because such “route” is the only one that it can travel through within easy reach of our star. This is due to the fact that the space around the Sun is curved. The geometry of the Universe has nothing Eucli-dean about it. But this is not easily comprehensible by anyone. In my opinion this should not however frighten you; if I was wrong, I can set your mind at rest by bringing your attention to the fact that there are millions of books on the market going into detail (for the profane, and in a very simple way) in the various themes of General Restricted Relativity.

The entire Universe is structured according to fi elds of energy,

*4 However, in astrophysics, for practical reasons inherent to calculating opera-tions, they are still many constant and units of measures which go back to the fi rst laws of Newton on gravitation are still widely accepted and used.


48

characterized by their own shape and intensity. Any “solid” object belonging to our Universe (from a matchbox to the biggest star which has never been identifi ed), is fundamentally nothing but a fi eld of energy. We alone, are nothing but fi elds of energy…that is waves of probability. Considering the fact that approximately 98% of an atom consists in an “empty space” and that everything in the Universe (including man) is in itself constituted by atoms, someone could obviously have a few doubts about our “real existence”. Maybe Minsky was right in supporting that the Universe ultimately…does not exist!

If we really wish to end it beautifully, we should simply consider the fact that the result between two potential gravitationals (positive and negative) constitute the entire Universe…is nothing at all! It is from this last consideration, that many scientists have started doubt-ing the origins of the Universe arising from a Big Bang; claiming that the Universe could actually have generated itself from nothingness! And therefore without an initial Big Bang.

Therefore, just like there are many “inevitable routes” between stars, comets and planets, also on Earth there are such inevitable “routes” between all the organic and non-organic entities which populate it. In Arkhètypon, I considered such “routes” to be like energetic tunnels, where any kind of physical entity (man included) is found trapped and is obliged to follow a determined route, following predefi ned schemes.

Starting from these considerations, it is therefore possible to chal-lenge the concept of subjective will and the concept of time. The moment that such concepts are challenged, we inevitably reach the idea of a predetermined future; the arrow of time disappears and we start to see a bridge between the quantum reality and the microscopic reality in accordance to Newton’s theories.

The breakdown of past, present and future that we utilize in order to determine an exact arrow in time, exists only in our minds; in the absolute reality of things, this arrow of time does not exist, the run-ning of time does not exist but only a unicum temporal-spacial time of more dimensions. It is true that each value of time is related to the inertial system it refers to (and that is demonstrated by the Restricted Relativity), but an absolute value of time (which englobes all these


49

“relative” times connected to its own inertial system), as claimed by H.Bergson and a little later by I. Prigogine, must necessarily exist.

In the last pages of the book Between Time and Eternity ,Ilya Prigogine and Isabelle Stengers, in the conclusion of a subject re-garding the distribution of average time in space-time, they expressed themselves in the following way::

“Contrary to what appears to be resulting from Restricted Relativity, there is therefore a universal time that begins with observing a physical relativistic phenomenon, in this case being the propagation of the wave. [Here, Prigogine refers to the example of an island and the observing of the “modernization wave” it is concerned with. Such wave would allow the homogeneity of the island’s space-time.N.d.A].

In the Minkowskian description, the observers observe each other reciprocally. Furthermore, they observe, the evolution of the fi eld, the dynamic unstable system which enables the introduction of an inner time.(...) The introduction of dynamic unstable processes therefore allows to reconcile the fundamental idea of Einstein of multi-faceted times linked with the existence of a Universal becoming, as supported by Bergson”.

So far, we have discussed that whether we talk of mass, energy or information, we are talking about the same thing; that is of an “entity” which constitutes the entire Universe in three different states of existence. (For example, we talk of mass when we talk of a stone; we talk of energy when we talk of quantum light, whilst when we talk of the mind, we can easily talk of information). But where could we place Time, the absolute Bergsonian one? In God=mc2 I suggested the idea that Time, whether intended to be some kind of energetic resonance produced by three different states of energy (mass, energy, information), the mind included. Whilst, for the human thought, I supported the following hypothesis:

“The human thought (and perhaps not only ours),can be only in part infl uenced by the illusory “running of time” that we perceive in the physical reality in which we live; it can override the space-temporal barriers, as it is not the fruit of a striking quantity of energetic interac-


50

tions which defi ne our physical reality, but rather a multidimensional resonance of interactions as such”.

Both Time and human thoughts, according to this hypothesis, are nothing but some kind of energetic resonance. The mind, that is di-namic information, is therefore able to generate, as well as thoughts, also Time! The deceptive “running of time” therefore, varies from subject to subject. Just like Einstein already claimed at the beginning of the last century; everyone will surely remember that famous rather ironic explanation that he gave to a journalist, eager to understand in the best of ways the concept of Relativity. In “God=mc2”, I even suggested a personal theory on the concept of biologic time.

And after this brief digression on …the mysteries of Time, I would like to return for a while to my discussion on energy fi elds which constitute the entire Universe. The way we have got used to seeing our surrounding reality, will not surely help you to easily un-derstand what I am about to explain, but you should not worry about it, I also found it diffi cult to see the reality of things with another set of eyes. Do not therefore feel discouraged, if what I am going to expose appears to be taken from a science fi ction story or by a rather exaggerated introduction of a Yoga manual. In life, there is a time also to understand, but no one will impose it on you…where and when (to understand); it will be your fate to principally determine the if and ultimately the where and when. But I shall come to the point. Closely observe the two following schematic drawings and various formulas that accompany them:


51

where ”m” is mass;”E ” stands for energy;”c ” stands for light velocity; “F “ stands for force and “g ” stands for gravitational ac-celleration (intensity of earth fi eld).

Now, let’s suppose we have a cylinder support of a stretched shape pushed into the ground (see fi g.1), able to withstand any type of force that applied onto it, without ever breaking or bending. We then lean on it a metal bar, a parallelepiped which is stretched with a square base, exactly on its centre-half (centre horizontal axis), so that both sides of the support “protrude” in equal measure. We now apply a F1 force on both ends of this metal bar, which has a suffi ciently enough value able to bend the same. The (F1) force applied on both sides of the metal bar, is to be intended as the product of a fi ctitious mass (m), for the acceleration of the gravitational fi eld (g).

In this case, it is therefore essential considering any kind of mass, that is a certain quantity of energy…at a solid state, which ”presses”, as to invading another quantity of energy (that is the metal bar). The moment we apply this force, we witness an exchange of elemen-tary particles. The largest quantity of energy (F1), “crashes” onto a smaller quantity of energy, constituted by a bar. The moment that this process ends, and the energetic equilibrium is reinstalled, we believe that the bar has bent, but in reality there has simply been an exchange of particles between two energy potentials (or quantity of energy, however one might want to say between two energy fi elds, one which is “stronger” and the other “weaker”. There has been a defor-mation of the spacial-temporal tissue circumscribed to the event (to


52

the experiment corporeals), just in conjunction with this exchange of particles. The force that has been applied (F1), can be considered as an energy! In fact E = (F . c2 ) / g ; and it can be expressed for example as Mev or in Gev (respectively Mega or Giga electro volt)...or in Joules. Even if it is expressed in Newton, the force still remains a kind of dynamic energy, that is the result of an exchange between elementary particles. It is indeed true that F = (E . g ) / c2 !

It isn’t the spoon that bends; it is the space around it that distorts. AS TAUGHT BY THE ZEN.

A ungrateful task...

No one is able to know what the true meaning of life is, but at least, someone was able to understand what various activities which for centuries have been governing and modelling human existence actually represent. Towards the end of the book “The Anthropic Cos-mological Principle”, the authors, J.D.Barrow e F.J.Tipler , discussed the subject in the following way:

“(...)all of life’s activities, whether they consist in scientifi c research, economic production or mystic meditation, consist in the elaboration of information. (...)A limit which is above the total quantity of infor-mation that can be produced by using the entire amount of material resources of a solar system is 1070 bit. Because 1019 bit / s (1010 bit / person per second x 109people) represents a lower limit for the rhythm of information elaboration in our civilization, our solar system will be completely consumed in less than 5000 years if science continues to grow in such an exponential way to the current rhythm throughout this lapse of time. Therefore, in a few thousands of years, whatever activi-ties it will be dedicating itself to, an advanced civilization will be in a need for new resources”.

A few pages later he adds:

“(...)Therefore, whatever an intelligent being does, and not only his thoughts ,is to elaborate information in one form or another. It follows


53

that all thoughts and imaginable actions of any possible form of life, are ultimately subjected to constrictions imposed by the law of physics which rule the elaboration of information.”

Every biological entity of this planet, is to be considered as some kind of “method of energy exchange”. These entities, ultimately repre-sent the analysis of structures (or of systems, as one may say) opened (rather fragile) towards its surrounding environment, able to extract from such environment, all the energy required in order to live. The moment a human being takes in food, all he does is elaborate (para-phrasing Barrow and Tipler) information in the “solid state”(that is, food), into other kinds of information which are less complex, mov-ing from caloric energy to a pure and simple dynamic information, which ultimately constitutes all of our thoughts.

Nothing is created and nothing is destroyed, everything is trans-formed…someone said a few centuries ago. Now, it would therefore be wrong to believe that only biological entities are able to feed them-selves (as open structures) and reproduce themselves.

Even if it could seem incredible, it is not only the chemical factors of carbon, able to generate physical entities of this kind; that is open structures able to feed themselves and reproduce themselves.

In 1950, Von Neumann, suggested a machine able to reproduce itself, of which the replication cycle resulted surprisingly similar to that of viruses. In “The Anthropic Cosmological Principle”, Barrow and Tipler explain with the following words the functioning of a machine by Von Neumann:

“In Von Neumann’s scheme, a machine which reproduces itself consists in two parts, a constructor and an information deposit which contains the instructions for the constructor. The latest is a machine which manipulates the matter enough to be able to make the necessary various parts of the selfreproducing machine and assemble them in the fi nal structure.The complexity of the constructor greatly depends on that of the selfreplicant machine and by the material available in the environment. The most general type of constructor, called a universal constructor, is a machine, or if you prefer, a robot, able to do anything as long as it is given the appropriate instructions.(...)The deposit of


54

information consists in the memory of a calculator which contains detailed instructions on how the constructor needs to manipulate the matter: fi rst of all, it supplies the instructions to make a copy of a constructor without the deposit of information, or a constructor with an empty calculator memory. The deposit of information is therefore duplicated, that is it registers the information contained in the memory of the calculator. Finally, the deposit of information and the construc-tor are assembled, so that the create a copy of the original machine. The copy has all the original information, so it is therefore able to reproduce itself in the same environment”.

Now, someone could object about the fact that Von Neumann’s machine should be intended to be like a physical entity open towards the environment which surrounds it (even though it is able reproduce itself); and in fact he would have all reasons to do so. Von Neumann`s machine, as described by Barrow and Tipler, is certainly able to self reproduce but it is absolutely not able to power itself, which is an es-sential condition if we want to describe it as a physical entity open towards the environment which surrounds it. Such machine, to be able to produce others similar to it, must accomplish a task, which means that it must consume energy. It will therefore only be able to produce a limited number of machines, a number that will obvi-ously be in relation to its own autonomy (that is on the length of its own batteries!). The machines that are therefore produced, will themselves be bound to the quantity of energy which they initially have at their disposal, destined to lower the more they actually pro-duce others. Therefore, to be able to talk about a machine, similar in each and every way to a living system, that is a physical entity, open towards its surrounding environment and thus able to power itself and secondarily able to reproduce, it is necessary that the same is able to constantly extract energy from its surrounding environment ... without ever having to be serviced by man! It is on the basis of these principles, that we will be able to elaborate, in a future which is surely not too far away, some kind of machine… of a perpetual motion. To enable machines to self replicate themselves it will be anyhow necessary to wait a long time…a very long time.

The creation of such kind of machine, able to refl ect some proper


55

and real living systems, is not however impossible. A solution could be to ensure that they can be powered by the energy of the sun; unfor-tunately with the technology that is nowadays available, they would not be able to constantly store a suffi ciently high quantity of such energy to be able to reproduce themselves. We will therefore have to wait a few hundred years, before such machines can be produced. Until mankind will not be able to design and produce in series, en-gines of total annihilation, the fi lm Terminator will never have any prophesy in it. Believe me.

Even supposing that one day science could create such monsters, that is machines able to reproduce themselves, we can only hope that they would always operate and in any case for the wellbeing of mankind.

“Science, each inclined towards its own direction, has up to now not caused much harm; but one day, the merging of fragments of dissociated conscious will open up panoramas of reality so

terrifying…that we will either go crazy for the revelation, or will run away from its mortal light, searching refuge in the peace and security

of new dark centuries”.H.P. LOVECRAFT

In the last few decades, scientists have gone very close to the equa-tion which is the basis of all of Creation, that is:

mass = energy = information; however, they unfortunately still consider information to be something well distinct from energy. They consider it to be something closely connected to energy, but its intrin-sic properties have little to do with such entity (energy).

The Swiss physicist Daniel Spreng, managed to give his best con-tribution by devising a type of triangle, actually also homonymous (Spreng Triangle), which defi nes relationships symbiotic between en-ergy, time and information. In this triangle, any combination of two of the three variables mentioned above, is able to modify the value of the remaining variable (or vice versa; that is: any variation of one of these three variable entities, is able to perform a modifi cation combined in the other two).


56

Each point of the triangle represents a possible combination of

information, time and energy necessary to accomplish a determined task. The top vertex of the triangle, represent the point of maximum energy; whilst that on the bottom right, defi nes the point where the “required” energy is apparently null. The vertex below to the right of the triangle, mirrors the world of the primitive man, whereas the necessary information needed to build instruments able to reduce physical labour, it was necessary to spend more time and energy in any ambit of human activity. The pensive philosopher, or the physic deep in thought for the elaboration of the desired Theory of All, is found in E=0; point where it is necessary to spend much time and information in order to reach concrete results. The current world, modern and rather advanced as far as technology is concerned, is currently found in the proximity of the higher vertex of the Spreng Triangle, where he has given time a zero value; because in such con-test, where much quantity of energy and information is employed, each activity carried out by mankind is considerably accelerated.


57

ARKHÈTYPON

“You cannot petition theLord,with prayer”.

J.M.

Synchronisms

The alien carefully looked at the crystal, contemplating it for a few minutes; then he turned towards the wiseman and made him aware of his future. “Everything is already written in the stars”, he said, “and your will or anyone else’s will could never change it. Your will and that of your peers, are part of a sole will, part of an objective which is unknown to human beings; besides, for any other civilization which is markedly evolved in this Universe.

The subjective will of any biologic entity is a mere illusion. We desire whatever is imposed upon us; those who accept the game, fi ght, suffer and obtain nothing. And it is this way that God entertains him-self, this is his favourite pastime. There are those who actually fi ght death but must unwillingly survive. A tumour kills only those who are afraid of it. Anxiety, fear and depression increase out of proportions the volume of a tumour. Are you afraid of death? Are you afraid of discovering what lies on the other side of the wall? Well, your time surely will not be delayed.”

After he had heard these last words, the wiseman who was rather afraid, immediately asked the alien. “Why are you talking about a tumour? Am I actually ill? Will I soon die, is this what you are trying to tell me?“

The alien, calmly replied:“The tumour I am talking about has


58

many faces, and each of them has a mnemonic inprint of all of your suffering. On one side, the graceful face of an insensitive woman, on another the image of a few typewritten pages…a thesis, another of the dark and sparkly eyes of a joyous little boy…in more than six hundred faces there is the image of your genes enclosed in a golden cage. The other faces are yet to be completely formed. I am talking about a vir-tual tumour, but if you shall continue undeterred to desire, this could become real. If you decide to play the game, that is that you will try to obtain everything you desire, you will go through hell and consequently get closer to God. I want to emphasize that the subjective will does not exist, whoever decides to play the game, desiring and thus fi ghting against the program, is only carrying out whatever God wishes him to. The almighty brings suffering only to those who need to; because it is only through suffering that love and respect towards our peers can be learned.“

The wiseman tightened his shoulders and began to intensely think about what the alien had exposed and the moment his mind reached the maximum effort, his eyes saw the crystal slip from the alien’s hands and loudly shattering on the fl oor; he shifted his astonished look away from the fl oor and said: “Oh my God! I could have saved it at least a hundred times, it was falling so slowly”. Immediately the alien replied:“Don’t be astonished, it was “my” will that the crystal fell while you were racking your brain’s out, so that you would understand that the speed of our thoughts is actually more elevated than the speed on which we live and move”.

“But now, without that crystal, you will not be able to reveal my future” expressed the wiseman worriedly. The alien smiled and turned towards him with a gentle voice: “Information regarding your future is inscribed everywhere...on your nails, on that small stone next to my right foot” he said pointing at it “... on the iris of my left eye, on each rose petal which make your garden so beautiful..on any ponderable body of this Universe but not on energy quantums; as they are... in-formation. The crystal is one of the optimal ways to enable to extract and decode all the information which surrounds us, relating to our past, present and future; temporal parameters which in the absolute reality of objects do not exist. There is solely an unicum temporal space with more dimensions.“


59

At that point, the alien dug into an internal pocket of his cream coloured spacesuit and extracted a small, fl at, transparent and col-ourless disk, with the physical characteristics similar to glass, and delicately handed it over to the wiseman, who was readily opening his hands to receive it. He sighed, looked seriously into the wiseman’s eyes and said: “Whatever you are looking at into your hands is nothing but a holographic disk; if you will fi nd a way to make it rotate in the right direction and at the correct speed, as well as hitting it in the right place and with the right electromagnetic vibration frequency, and if you will be able to capture on a magnetic support all of the images that it will produce, as well as decode them in the right way…if you are able to do all those things, then the fi lm of your entire life will be projected in front of you with all of its fullness and magnifi cence”.

Each human being, the moment they were born until the day they die, fi nds himself living in some sort of energetic tunnel of the diameter equalling his height and of a boundless length, similar to a snake which creeps, twists itself and moves leaving traces on the earth’s surface and perhaps on great part of the Universe, a series of endless arabesques of the most unusual shapes, which would appear trivial and unreadable to the human eye (should these actually be observed); but contrary to what one may think, totally translatable and rich in meaning in the presence of a Divine Mind.

Some people believe that ...Human species is the name of the software and Universe the name of the hardware; but if the software name was Universe, what would be the hardware name? Perhaps…God? Can hardware autonomously action themselves and organize themselves? Most probably the most evolved; otherwise it would be necessary to imagine, apart from an endless series of Aleph also an endless series of Eternal Fathers.

In a single energetic tunnel, two, three, four or actually hundreds (if not thousands) human beings can “live together”; so an indi-vidual, without knowing, could actually be linked via some kind of wave function to another person who actually lives on the opposite side of the globe, twenty thousand kilometres away from him. When two human beings perceive that between them there is an affi nity of


60

thought, it is actually possible that they fi nd themselves in the same energetic tunnel.

A meeting between two individuals who spontaneously feel some sort of affi nity of thought, sometimes to an observer, whether slightly or rather intelligent (also in the eyes of those concerned) can appear to be totally acausal therefore unexplainable from a rational point of view, exclusively taking in consideration the most recent and signifi cant events of the lives of these two people and then making a small a probable calculation on the possibility of a such meeting actually taking place.

Jung spent a great part of his life trying to come to a rational and objective explanation which could highlight and therefore defi ne in terms more or less scientifi c the previously mentioned phenomenon; however, all that he was able to do (apart from adding such phenom-enon a touch of occultism by resorting to the Tarot and Astrology)*5 was to denominate such coincidences as signifi cative*6 syncronisms and associate the concept of contemporaneity of events, (by him defi ned as sincronicities, which is a phenomenon caused by acausal nexuses), a decorated idea bringing forth the concept unifying the latest by attempting a connection with the theory of archetypes, the concept which looked at the gifts and extra-sensorial potential of each individual, and fi nally by bringing together everything (wher-ever necessary) with the concept of collective subconscious or to possible links between psyche and matter. Jung’s adopted position to defi ne the phenomenon of sycronicity,which according to many at that time (as well as nowadays) appeared to be slightly hasty and of a methaphysical taste, anyhow reveals all of its importance in a broader context: the one where embracing the hypothesis of an ho-lographic Universe. (I will go into further detail later in the book).

Being able to understand the signifi cance, meaning and logic of endless arabesques of countless energetic tunnels created on the

*5 Confr. “Syncronicity” of Carl G.Jung (ed.Bollati & Boringhieri,1980)*6 Coincidences which are signifi cative for the simple fact that they are able, thanks

to the contructive thought which normally is aroused and takes shape between two or more similar minds, to bring a change (if not decisive, still an important one) to the life of one or both parties.


61

earth surface and probably also in more distant spaces, would mean knowing all the laws of chaos governing our Divine Design. Man still hasn’t been able to perfectly understand how...his own brain functions, so how can it know how God’s functions. Trying to be optimistic, we could however ask ourselves: “Could there ever exist, in a certainly rather distant future, a physical instrument created by man, which when located in a determined distance from the Earth (or even on Earth), which is able to detect and record all the move-ments made by a convulsive mass of energetic tunnels, of each bio-logical entity present in such tunnels, and then, resorting to the most complex mathematical formulas which regulate the laws of chaos, establish with absolute certainty, where Mr Smith is located and what he will be doing on the 4th of July in the year 2015 at 18.45…and thirty seconds?“. I believe that this question does not even deserve an answer; therefore let only Mr. Jack-A rack his brains out actually trying to fi nd one.

The sole purpose of human evolution (or of the Divine Program if you prefer), is to be able to come to a single energetic tunnel, from which no other isolated energetic fi lament begins (prevalently consti-tuted by biological entities characterized by the syntony of vibration, in contrast with the one of its surrounding environment), where there are probably only a few thousand human beings, ready to accomplish a gap leap and therefore being able to move to other areas of the Universe to observe other worlds without ever actually interacting with them, by simply enjoying their beauty and uniqueness.

Signifi cant coincidences or syncronisms (the way Jung loved to defi ne them) which characterize the life of each individual gifted with a certain intellective originality, represented the basis onto which all possible analogue deductions focus on, which let us comprehend, from a more intuitive rather than rational point of view, the intrinsic meaning of the previously mentioned theory.

It is actually the most improbable and therefore extremely sig-nifi cant events which are able to modify (when manifested), whether for the better or the worst, the destiny of mankind. Only one person out of two billion (at that time) individuals was able to understand how obtain an extraordinary vast amount of energy from a ...simple atomic nucleus. What if Einstein and Hitler had never been born?


62

It could be easily be stated that the evidence of each extremely improbable event, from a purely rational point of view, would nec-essarily and contemporaneously entail, as a “logical” consequence, some extremely signifi cant implications upon the human behavioural model.

The theory of Stephen J.Gold of the pointed equilibrium, Darwin’s theory of the natural selection and fi nally Jung’s sincronicity, all have a sole common denominator: the extreme mathematical improbability of acausal events which characterize them.

Human intelligence does not completely follow the entropy prin-ciple, it actually constantly evolves towards a state of higher order; obviously I do not refer to the intelligence of each single human being and thus to the brief useful time span (which can be exploited with diffi culty) as defi ned by his life, which has no way of increasing itself, but I refer to the intelligence of the entire human species.

At this point, it is absolutely necessary to remember that:despite the probability of existence (or manifestation) of a higher

order referring to a microscopic system (atomic-molecular) is ex-tremely scarce, they will anyhow be much higher that the probability of existence (or manifestation) of a higher order referring to a mac-roscopic system.

In an isolated signifi cant coincidence as well as in a qualitative leap at an evolutive level referring to mankind or to any other ani-mal species, there is always therefore a trace of the shadow of a high improbability of manifestation of a higher order referring to a macroscopic system.

Because the probabilities of manifestation of a higher order refer-ring to an atomic-molecular system, are higher in comparison to those of a higher order referring to a macroscopic system; it can be inferred that casual genetic mutation in an animal species must forc-edly be more frequent than evolutive qualitative leaps as well as each signifi cative coincidence (in this case intended as a signifi cant event for the whole of mankind, such as a fall of a meteorite of immense dimensions on our planet).

If our neurons had not been able through hundreds of thousands of years of evolution to reach a state of a higher order, we would very probably still fi nd ourselves at the Stone Age; or maybe we


63

would never have actually existed, because the impossibility, for an atomic-molecular system to reach a determined and rather elevated order state, would imply a “phase displacement” of some percentage upon the most common value of Nature constants (such as Planck’s for example) which, as well as not granting us our existence, would also not let the Universe, which to us is so familiar, to exist.

Virtual Realities

Human thought is not constrained by any spatial-temporal lim-it. This is demonstrated by the fact that at times (principally when awake) we perceive images relating to our habitat, where a deter-mined event is defi ned, which within a few hours*7 appear in front of our eyes with amazement, obviously in the physical reality in which we live in our daily lives; this means that these images represent events relating to our existence (life) which must still occur, that they are about to become real. Such phenomenon is commonly defi ned, in the psychoanalytical terminology as a dejà vù, and could, in some way, fall within the limited case in such phenomenology relating to the human psyche.

“To the unconscious psyche, time and space appear to be relative, that is knowledge is found in a spatio-temporal continuum where space is no longer space and time is no longer time. Therefore, if

the unconscious develops and maintains a specifi c potential in the unconscious, a possibility of perceiving and “knowing” parallel

events arises”.CARL GUSTAV JUNG

We can reach places with our thought which cannot be reached with our physical body. In an hypothetical time machine equipped with highly evolved technology able to disconnect the human mind from the fi rst dimensional reality (where with a physical body it in-

*7 The lapse of time between the perceived image, that is between the perceived event and its manifestation in the physical reality, can anyhow vary according to the case, from a few seconds to actual years.


64

teracts with its surrounding environment) and projected in another N-dimensional reality, that is in another space-time dimension (for example in the year 2000 BC or 2300 AC)*8, the body of an hypo-thetical time traveller would fi nd himself on a comfortable “shrink’s couch”, whilst his mind (in a terrestrial reality rather remote in time or rather distant in the future), associated to a “virtual” body to which everything would obviously appear completely real, which could observe every event happening in that determined lapse of time, but never actually be able to interact with them. In whichever N-dimensional reality “He” would fi nd himself, would always be a passive spectator, a ghost able to walk through walls without any effort, but with a beating heart and therefore sensitive to each bio-dynamic change of his state and condition. The reason that would not make him sink to the depth of the earth, would solely be his...beliefs, his willpower; the strength which if used in other terms, could even grant him the power to move around by ...fl ying. Travelling through time, in his case, would therefore be similar to daydreaming.

Each temporal interval, is to be included (like a well defi ned point) in a determined oscillation of the curbing of space and to every degree of oscillation, would therefore have to be associated to a determined space model, actually named as N-dimensional. Such oscillation of the curbing of space could actually be cyclical, and its duration could range from a few minutes (rather diffi cult to believe)

*8 The idea of a space dimensions must absolutely not deceive us by letting us fl y with our imagination to dream about ...“things from another world”. Time is one and space as well, space to which it is associated, and every second that our clock scans includes an endless series of spatiotemporal dimensions. It is essen-tial in this case to be able to distinguish a space of many dimensions as a pure-ly abstract concept, feature which exclusively falls in the fi eld of mathematics, from the classic (real) quadri-dimensional one (3D+t) which increases thanks to the infi nite values of t (time), in a series which is also an infi nite series of spatiotemporal “models” of space-time, incautiously as well as probably impro-perly defi ned as N-dimensional. There are some theories in the fi eld of physics which offer to demonstrate the possible existence of pluri-dimensional realities (ND+t) which is not exclusively in the fi eld of mathematics but actually in the fi eld of physics and therefore only conceivable in other Universes thus as absurd as far from anything we could possibly conceive; in any case, such theories must not be taken into consideration in this contest.


65

to a few terrestrial millenniums (slightly more credible). It would be possible to reach such evaluation (slightly more reliable than the lat-est) by indirect means should it be possible to measure the frequency and intensity of gravitational waves.

If the oscillation of the curbing of space was actually cyclical, it would not at all be diffi cult to imagine models of space repeating themselves through time. To make an example: if in 1492 AC on Earth there was an X-dimensional space model, the same could have exactly corresponded to its X1- dimensional 2200 AC twin.

Which other fundamental factor should therefore be considered in the creating of a hypothetical time machine (apart from the pa-rameters of measurement relating to the oscillation of the curbing of space), so that an hypothetical traveller could easily decide to move into the year 2200 AC, without unwillingly fi nding himself, after having pressed a button, in the year 1492 AC.? Easily said: the expansion of the Universe.

Up to now we have mainly considered the possibility that hu-man thought travels through time; without obviously being able to demonstrate that it actually exists. Nevertheless, admitting that this possibility could mirror a certain level of probability inherent to na-ture to travels through time (from a rational-intuitive point of view) and therefore to be considered completely plausible, we could ask ourselves: how would an hypothetical time traveller fi nding himself virtually projected to a temporal interval rather far from his N-di-mensional reality (for example in the year 2500 BC or in the year 6500 AC, at approximately 4500 terrestrial years of distance from his temporal distance) see the physical-dynamic reality surround-ing him? Would he actually see the images (more precisely events) of such reality in a distorted thus ...“unnatural” way due to a great difference of curbing of space with respect to the one inherent to the temporal interval left behind by him (by his mind, to be more precise) to transfer himself into the past or the future? On the other hand, would such problem actually not exist because his virtual im-age would immediately adapt to any model of space he would fi nd himself ? By appealing solely to our common sense, we could easily opt for the second option.


66

In conclusion, this brief digression on time travels (forecasted by Einstein’s equations in his theory of special Relativity which were never seriously taken into consideration by any serious scientist, due to the Paradox of twins, Paradox of grandfather and many other “log-ical” paradoxes) I will now take into consideration the possibility, for a human being (or for any other physical body, whether animated or not), that is for a physical entity formed by atoms and molecules and therefore ponderable, to travel through time. Granted that it is not actually my intention to try to support such possibility or actu-ally minimize it; my intention is to uniquely analyze the aspects and most signifi cant consequences from a “quantum-classical” point of view (therefore leaving the resolution of all “logical” paradoxes, to phylosophers and most ascetic scientists).

Therefore, let’s imagine two points in space (A and B,see fi g. 1.1), between which there is a determined distance (c), in three distinct dimensional situations; that is in three distinct spatiotemporal tis-sues. In order to facilitate your comprehension, I would suggest to compare distance “c” to the spatiotemporal tissue.

Apparently, when we refl ect erroneously in euclidean terms, it would appear that the distance between A e B decreases parallel to the decline of the curving of the spatiotemporal tissue or viceversa. Well, this is absolutely untrue. Let’s imagine that the spatio-temporal tissue (c) represents a long metallic fi lament constituted by atoms and molecules. By measuring the distance between points A e B that is, between their extremities, in whichever model of N-dimensional space we fi nd ourselves, the fi lament would always appear to be the same length. This is for the simple fact that not only the metallic fi lament is infl uenced by the spatio-temporal curving but also the observer. Where is it therefore necessary to research physical differ-ences inherent to the three fi lament models? (see fi g. 1.1) Otherwise,


67

going back to travels through time, should research be carried out in the three models (in case the same individual fi nds himself in three different models of space or spatio-temporal tissue)?

Would the three fi laments-individuals show in all the different models (three) of space-time the same quantum behaviour? Let’s try to fi nd out:

A dilated spatio-temporal tissue, due to its own “strong” curving, implies a considerably decrease of the absolute value of Time (|T|) and in line with a considerable increase of the absolute value of space (|S|). Such important characteristic of the spatio-temporal tissue is nothing but a logical consequence of the mathematization of the space-time concept, that is:|T|.|S|=K(where K represents a constant present in each point of the Universe). This hypothesis-consideration was reached on the basis of Prigogine’s on Universal time (which originally was Bergson’s); idea which was developed mathematically in the book ”Between Time and Eternity” with an analysis on systems of time distribution, average times within space-time.

It is clear that no physicist which is ..mentally healthy, would actu-ally ever dare to challenge the fact that space and time are completely relative to the system in which they belong; and would therefore never actually dare to talk about space and absolute time. But as we have seen, thanks to Prigogine’s work, it is at least possible to accept the idea of Absolute Time.

Now considering that we fully accept the fact that the entire Universe is defi ned by some kind of Absolute Time, thanks to that simple game of symmetries which has always characterized every new principle in the scientifi c fi eld, it is therefore essential that its adversary exist…which is Absolute Space!

If we consider certain the argument that the fundamental struc-ture of space-time remains constant in each part of the Universe, we must also take for granted that space and time must necessarily abide to a universal law of complementarity, actually apt to guarantee the invariability of the fundamental structure of space-time ... in any area of the Universe! At this point it would be completely wrong to believe that I would want to readdress Einstein’s popular Cosmologi-cal Constant; the product of space and time (whether absolute or


68

relative), defi nes a constant which cannot be expressed in a unit of energy (Joules,eV,cal,...)!

On the other hand, what such constant represents, which I have defi ned with the symbol K is nothing but the spectre, the ”soul”, of each spatiotemporal structure obviously expressed with a symbolic unit of measure. In brackets:

It is now known that as J.Magueijo says : ”(...) the problem of the Cosmological Constant is due to the fact that the energy of emptiness is not “diluted” by the expansion of the Universe, it is the opposite of what happens with matter and radiation. For this reason the energy of emptiness would quickly end up dominating the Universe, unless it weren’t possible to already fi nd a way to brutally suppress it in the primordial Universe.”

Magueijo, a physicist of Portuguese origins who is well known throughout the world, also claims that the speed of light is not con-stant in the Universe; from such hypothesis-premise he has elabo-rated a series of theories linked to the concepts of Special and Gen-eral Relativity (which together take the name of VSL; the acronym is translated in varying speed of light) with which he claims to have “found a way to exorcise the Cosmological Constant”.

There is only one way to ripristinate the concept of Constant Cosmology, without it contrasting the laws of the Theory of Relativ-ity, and such Constant is to be intended as a symbolic entity, linked to the concept of energy from Plans which are so fi ne, which today’s man is still unable to visualize and therefore able to expose in a mathematical way; only in such acceptation, it is possible to identify the constant K, with the Cosmological Constant.

The increase of the absolute value of space, implies a necessary atomic-molecular compression of the subject under discussion suit-able for guaranteeing its energetic compactness. This is a condition necessary so that the atoms which constitute the body under discus-sion do not tend to disassociate themselves from each other (which the tendency of atomic dissociation, more commonly known as ra-dioactivity happens to bodies found in a space contracting itself and which the absolute value of Time tends to considerably increase). A radioactive body, must therefore be intended as a complex form of energy, able to induce space to contract itself!


69

It could therefore by supposed that a radioactive body moves in space at extremely elevated speeds, that it emits a minor number of radioactive particles, with respects to another (identical) body which is instead found in a state of stillness. We have therefore arrived at this point able to propose a new guise, as a fi nal condition of our model of initial space-time N-dimensional, the so-called...Contrac-tion of lenghts (according to the General Relativity and “related” Lorentz’s high speeds; such analogy appears evident if we consider space covered by a body in linear motion, as dilated with respect to the space circumscribing the same body in an inertial system.

Let’s now compare our argument with the basis of General Rela-tivity in order to make them more evident and therefore, as far as some aspects…convalidate them:

a)The theory of G.R. states that in the proximity of mass, watches are slower.[The value of absolute time decreases considerably when space tends to dilate itself, and vice versa. A strong curbing of space, implies a strong dilatation of the same. Around mass, space is rather curved, so it implies that watches should therefore run slowly].

b)The theory of G.R. states that in the proximity of mass, gauges

(lengths) actually get shorter.

An interesting aspect therefore of the physical reality our really pleasant time traveller could fi nd itself, at a distance of a few mil-leniums from his starting temporal interval (that his from his initial space model), is that the same could make it appear (to Eternal Fa-ther’s eyes, the only observer who is not subjected to spatio-temporal bonds), with a different “stature” for each different spatio-temporal model. He could obviously never be aware of such thing.

All these considerations and “logical” deductions on the nature of time travelling, we could solely accept if we took for granted the initial argument on cyclical oscillation of space-time curving of the Universe; otherwise the same would not make any sense.

...Dulcis in fundo:


70

With a simple analogue reasoning we could come to the following conclusion: if the contraction of lengths in the theory of General Relativity refl ects in some way the Contraction of Lorentz expected for bodies in linear motion at high speeds, because for both a de-termined dilatation of space appears (in order for them to manifest themselves) and considering the fact that for each value of the Con-traction of Lorentz corresponds a respective relativistic increase of the mass of the body under question, it could be deducted that such relativitist increase of mass would also somewhat correspond to the contraction of lengths expected in the proximity of mass, that is, where the space is more curved and therefore more dilated. I am simply saying that the mass of a body could vary depending upon the curving of the space in which the same is found. The mass of a body moving away from Earth, should therefore as a principle, noticeably diminish. Such decline, however, due to its endlessly small entity, will surely remain still imponderable for several years to human beings. Inertial mass and gravitational mass, could therefore not be the same but because on Earth the variation of the Gravitational Constant is too small to be measured, nobody has yet been able to deduce such possibility.

As a last analysis, we could risk the hypothesis that the frequency of stationary waves which defi ne the energetic levels of atoms con-stituting a determined body that moves away from Earth, due to an decrease of the curving of space and therefore a slight contraction of the same, tends to increase sensibly. In such case, the body under discussion would lean towards manifesting a determining radioactive behaviour (even if minimal) which would lead to an inevitable and obviously imponderable diminishing of its mass. From this hypoth-esis, another follows which is even more bizzarre:

The increase of frequency of stationary waves, would entail a proportional increase of quantum interferences of the system taken into consideration. The velocity of decoherence of such system, be-cause of its progressive move away from the Earth, would therefore lead to a decrease; this is because in such a system, there would be


71

more quantum interferences to eliminate*9 The body in question, could therefore in this case, present a determined quantum-classical behaviour.

If we go back for the nth and last time to our dearest time trav-eller (Mr.Jack-a-fl y ), we could even imagine that he, in determined models of space where he could unfortunately be “projected, he would adopt a quantum-classical behaviour. In front of the eyes of a possible troglodyte or scientist in the year 2600, he could therefore appear and disappear; exactly as the light of an intermittent lamp. Such hypothesis or considerations could surely remind someone of the most striking parts of Charles Berlitz’s book: Experiment Phila-delphia. And if we were invaded by “hordes of tourists from the fu-ture” on a daily basis, contrary to Hawking’s beliefs, but could not realize it for the simple fact that we are unable to see them?

...Thank’ you God

Sometimes, what we are unable to conceive, is the result of an interaction between similar worlds, but unfortunately placed in mod-

*9 In a model of “measure”, whatever produces a reduction of the waves pack, it is the interaction of the system which is around it (for example the same “me-asuring device”). More generally, quantum objects are never completely isola-ted by everything which surrounds them, with the term “everything which sur-rounds them” we mean anything which interacts with the system (a device, air molecules, photons, etc...).Multiple interactions between a quantum object and “whatever surrounds it”, cause a much faster destruction of system quantum interferences . Interferences are a undulatory phenomenon, and characterize quantum behaviour. The distruction of interferences, entails a suppression of the superpositions of states characterizing the quantum object; the same the-refore, uniquely having some simple state, immediatly assumes a classical be-haviour. In a macroscopic object (for example a cat), each of its atom interacts with all the other atoms of the environment which are around it. All these in-teractions spontaneously provoke a “buzzing” of quantum interferences, which nearly instantaneously disappear. This is why quantum physics is not applied on our scale: the systems are never isolated. This phenomenon has been christened as “decoherence”, more precisely the destruction of coherence of the quantum states which eliminates interferences. The velocity of decoherence increases with the size of the system. For example a cat, which consists in approximately 1027 particles, makes uncoherence in 10-23 seconds. This explains why “living-dead” cats have never been seen, and fi nally why decoherence is so diffi cult to observe.(taken from the magazine: Science &Vie,February 1999,pp.47;50).


72

els of space which are different. Do you perhaps believe that the three-bars of Oscar Reutersvärd is an object which is impossible to conceive for an individual who is found to be living in a model of hy-perbolical space? (Try to play with one of his models made of foam). The human mind would be able to conceive even the impossible, if only it was able to leave determined models (or layers) of holographic space where it is constantly trapped. The immense quantity of infor-mation which constitutes the mind of a human being (of an average age, intelligence and culture) is strictly bound, in the way that it moves through other holographic structures in the reality it is circled by, from determined biophysical schemes which have had the chance to become concrete and therefore assume a well defi ned aspect which is more or less constant in time (I obviously refer to the phenomenon of autopoiesi and the respective analogies with that of the dissipative systems of Prigogine), in the course of millions of years of evolution. Such binding, between the human mind and its potential migrating capabilities through other holographic layers, have anyhow become weaker and weaker as well as inconsistent the more the degree of analogic elaboration of the human thought adopts higher values, at the expense of the old mnemonic mould of the binary mould.

The day when the greater part of humanity will be able to access the wonders of psychokinesis and clairvoyance is not undoubtedly close by, but neither too far. The evolution of the mind-body-reality system which surrounds it, is the result of constant interaction be-tween these three elements (integrated in Bohm’s holomovement), which can be compared to the one defi ning the non-linear phenom-enons of classic dynamics and the one defi ning the non-local phe-nomenons of quantum mechanics. This evoluting continuum of such holographic model of reality could however, in a distant future reso-nate with other models of a holographic state where each physical entity (whether animated or not) would present itself, thanks to a perfect frequency syntony (vibration) between the interactive parts of the system, free of each bound and inherent to its nature, as far as mass, density, motion and position and free of each bound which is inherent to the nature of the environment surrounding the same (gravitational attraction, atmospheric pressure, etc...) . Only by ac-cepting this premise, we are able to imagine a future where man is


73

able to move objects from a distance just with the power of the mind or to visualize determined events even before they actually happen. Each biologic entity who is a highly thinking being (I mainly refer to human beings in this planet and if we paraphrase Leibniz, we obviously could not include monads within such thinking beings) so it can be imagined as an immense accumulation of information (or memory bytes)*10 which is super-organized, dynamic and in con-

*10 The capacity of a common human brain is generally valued at around 1015 bits; it is believed that such information is stored in synaptic connections. Conside-ring that during a single mental event, only a small part of the brain oscillates between each and a maximum of ten per cent of its total volume, we can easily realize how extremely vast the potential latent information in the human brain is. In each case, the potential information relating to the human mind, still re-mains the tip of an iceberg, if compared to the potential information relating to the system mind-body or to the mind-body-surrounding environment which is even more complex. In order to fully understand the meaning of this latest consideration, it is necessary to ask the following question: What is information and where does it actually originate?

Mechanics demonstrates us that the number of encoded bits in a limited region is compared with the number of possible quantum states in such region. Beken-stein’s limit determines the fundamental limit relating to the number of possible quantum states within a limited region. If information I is linked to the number of possible states N from the following equation:

I = log2 N, then Bekenstein’s limit to the quantity of information coded within a sphere of ray R and of total energy E is: I ≤ 2πER / ( hc ln 2). Generally if adop-ted, as a superior limit to the number of bits, codifi ed by part of any physical entity which has a mass of one hundred kg and a volume of approximately 4,2 m3, the value would be:

I ≤ 2,57686 x 1045 bits. Having said this, someone could rightly ask himself what such blessed information is and where the same originates from; however perhaps, everything would become clearer in his mind if he were to ask himself the following question. What is energy? Well, the puzzling hypothesis-conclu-sion which can possibly be reached with a simple analogue reasoning, is that ultimately, energy represents nothing but a complex form of information. It was extremely diffi cult for physics at the beginning of last century to accept the idea that mass is nothing but a complex form of energy, and I suppose that for the orthodox scientifi c community of the 21st century it will be just as diffi cult to accept the idea that the fundamental constituent of energy could be pure and simple ...information.

“(...)all entities which are present in the current Universe, codify a quantity of information which is well below the quantity allowed by the quantum theory of fi elds. For example, if a hydrogen atom codifi ed all the information which is gran-ted according to Bekenstein’s limit, it could codify approximately 4 x 106 bits of information (...)Therefore a hydrogen atom could approximately codify a megab-yte of information, whilst it usually codifi es much less than a bit. The hydrogen


74

tinuous evolution, information which constantly renews itself and sometimes expands within determined limits; therefore supposing that it is possible beginning in such a distance future some kind of interaction or energetic resonance between the various holographic states which make our Universe, and in this way creating phenomena transcending each principle of physical order between the different elementary forces of nature (objects materializing simply with the power of the mind, psychokinesis, etc…), would not at this stage (in my opinion) be too hazardous. Each physical event that comes into the category of such paranormal phenomena, because it is substan-tially undefi ned and therefore unconceivable according to the rules of orthodox physics if embracing the hypothesis of a holographic Universe, it immediately makes it possible to fi nd a logical explana-tion (which is diffi cult to understand and not easily imagined; speak-ing of which, I would strongly recommend reading the book: The holographic Universe,by Michael Talbot,1991).

Dynamic and Potential Information

It is actually well-known since time immemorial, that the energy of a given system is always preserved (nothing is created and noth-ing is destroyed, everything transforms itself), and this is the basis of the principle of thermodynamics. Not all kinds of energy are how-ever able to organize themselves, I obviously refer to heat and other kind of dispersive energy. The one million question which I actually want to ask you is the following: if information actually represents the fundamental constituent of energy, can the same organize itself through chaotic and dispersive structures of energy? Well, by accept-

mass surely isn’t used in an effi cient manner! If we presumed that the ray is that of a proton (R= 10-13 cm),the quantity of codifi ed information in the proton is con-stituted by only 44 bits! Such value is really small with respect to the complexity of the proton – three valency quarks, innumerable quarks and virtual gluons- which it is actually so complex that we haven’t yet been able to calculate the basic state of fundamental principles by using the Standard Model, even if we used the most advanced supercomputers!” (FRANK J. TIPLER,PHYSICIST)


75

ing the argument that all the phenomena of a paranormal nature*11 are effectively totally real for the subject who perceives them, it would defi nitely appear so.

“We are not human beings who live a spiritual experience. We are spiritual beings who live a human experience.“

PIERRE TEILHARD DE CHARDIN

Information which creates energetic confi gurations that are or-derly and dynamic (or dissipative structures) “with which” it chooses “to live”; it could anyhow “survive” well even through... or it would be perhaps better to say ...with the features of energetic chaos, with-out necessarily having to create orderly structures. Therefore, what could actually be the “reason” which pushes information to create determined energetic structures? Well, an answer to this question could be the following: every once in a while even the Universe, more precisely God, thinks; and everything which has form and structure therefore represents nothing but part of his memories. They are in-delible until his death (thermal death of the Universe)?

What if the same continued to exist eternally assuming other shapes and physical characteristics, once they have reached the Omega Point?*12 How will the next Universe be, will it also consist in light, starts, planets and black holes or only by light? Will God be reborn healthy or maimed? We could endlessly speculate on these and

*11 Namely pre-death experiences, the phenomenon of multiple personalities, the visualization of human energetic fi elds, out-of-body and out-of-mind journeys where there is no actual order relating to the “nature” of space and time (in a way that each place is instantly accessible as well as each time interval, whe-ther belonging to a rather remote past or a rather distant future), spontaneous recoveries from diseases which are more or less incurable, the phenomenon of stigmatas and many other unexplainable “miracles” from a scientifi c, typically orthodox point of view.

*12 According to F.J.Tipler, the latest, appears to be an hypothesis which should not be discarded. (See:The Phyiscs of Immortality, Frank J.Tipler).


76

many other questions belonging to the category of psychic processes OTW (Out of This World).

All high frequency elecromagnetic radiation (starting from X rays up to γ rays) is able to markedly infl uence the quantum structures of a system; the same is therefore able to vary determined schemes of dynamic orders relating to the elementary particles which consti-tute the atoms of any complex form of energy (ponderable bodies), thus bringing the physical entity mentioned so that it assumes other abnormal physical aspects (as they are unusual and original), some-times observable (as in the case of tumours for biologic entities, for example) and sometimes observable with diffi culty if not actually unobservable even with the most evolved physical instruments (by radiating a stone with γ rays for a constant period of twenty-four hours, the same will always maintain the same shape, even if we ob-serve it for an infi nite length of time). What actually stands out from these considerations is that an electromagnetic radiation at a high fre-quency is able to infl uence in a signifi cant way only biologic entities (that is complex open and dynamic forms of energy) and probably on many other dissipative structures (whether animated or not); that is to say that forms of energy in nature which are mostly fragile and delicate. By irradiating a biologic entity with high frequency rays, we increase the quantity of quantum interferences in the system:

[Biologic entities(B.E) – the environment which surrounds it], by doing this, we get the system (and especially the ‘B.E) to assume a velocity of decoherence which is less elevated. Such condition which is created (which is obviously “unfavourable” to the ‘B.E), makes sure that such entity, extends its quantum behaviour to layers which are higher than its own “energetic cortex”. Even if such phenomenon extended to few atomic groups and not to entire molecules, the same, with time (sometimes even lustre; still depending upon the intensity of the irradiance and by the biologic structure of the entity under discussion), would anyhow manifest all its infl uence on a large scale; for example as in the case of tumours. Similar to any kind of butterfl y effect, it therefore cannot be forecasted by any diagnosis or physical measurement, …before it enters in the classic Newtonian reality.

Let’s go back to the concept of energy and assume the fact that it is really constituted by ...“inseparable particles of information”.


77

Someone at this point could believe that even organic organism or actual stones could have some kind of conscience, or that they are anyhow able to perceive in some way everything which surrounds them. It is therefore necessary, in order to sustain a certain coher-ence between all the arguments exposed up to now, to distinguish information in two distinct classes:

a) Potential Information (which constitutes each ponderable physical entity).

b) Dynamic Information.Any kind of conscience therefore, must be intended as the mani-

festation of an elevated and dynamic order of information. Dynamic information can be imagined at this point like some sort of resonance deriving by potential information. If it is true that these two kinds of information eventually create a unicum, in which the laws of classical physics (dominion of dynamic information) interact with those of quantum mechanics (dominion of potential information), it follows that our rational conscience (dynamic information) can draw at any time information from our conscience (potential information) and vice versa.

...and this is how Jung found the peace he had lost.

Here is a one-million dollar question: is the potential information of an organic entity superior or identical to the potential information of a non-organic entity? Can Carbon, Nitrogen, Oxygen and Hy-drogen perhaps be considered as ...“monads” which are much more evolved that other monads (elements?) Is the potential information of an element identifi ed perhaps based on its own mass and atomic number? Let’s compare for a moment the values of these two physical sizes relating to the fundamental constituents of life as previously mentioned (C,N, O,H):

Atomic Number Mass NumberCarbon(C) 6 12.01 Nitrogen(N) 7 14.008Oxygen(O) 8 16.002Hydrogen(H) 1 1.008


78

We therefore have six neutrons and six protons for Carbon, seven netrons and seven protons for Nitrogen, eight neutrons and eight protons for Oxygen. Well, it appears that the symmetry game is per-fect; furthermore, Hydrogen, since constituted by only one proton (obviously excluding the tritium, one of its isotope) and therefore conceivable as a sphere, even represents the emblem of the concept of symmetry.*13 Where is it therefore necessary to research the val-ue of potential information that constitutes and characterizes the atom of a determined element, in the beauty of “symmetry” between neutrons and protons forming nucleus?...It could be an idea. If it was so, we could expect great things from the interaction between Calcium,Helium, and Silicon elements.

(Ca➙atomic number 20, mass number 40.08; He➙atomic number 2, mass number 4.003 ; Si➙atomic number 14, mass number 28.06) and Hydrogen.

Information loves symmetries and analogisms because it is only thanks to them that it is able to acquire values that are always increas-ing and therefore manifest itself in all of its fullness and beauty in the physical reality in which we live. Consider for an instance the beauty constituted by symmetries of a snowfl ake; combined Hydrogen and Oxygen can make miracles. But would such miracles be possible without the symmetries of the neuron-proton which characterize the nucleuses of these two elements? In which reality are miracles created and take shape, in the quantum reality or the classic one subjected to Newton’s laws? Only a mind which works in an analogue way is able to extract from the environment surrounding it, constituted by the collective conscience (dynamic information) and by each type of physical entity (potential information), the highest quantity of information of syntony (potential + dynamic) bearable by a common human brain (or by a common human body, even supposing that it is

*13 In this “game of symmetries”, solely based on the numeric equality between protons and neutrons (constituents of nucleus), an important component which we should take into consideration, is represented by the fact that the nuclear power (for light neucleus), makes it reach the maximum stability if the number of neutrons is approximately the same as the number of protons.


79

not only our superior organ to capture such information. We could endlessly speculate about this point too).

But the analogue machine can also have some disadvantages, as when it no longer puts limits to it, it acquires much more informa-tion than what it is allowed, and inevitably folly takes over. One of the best analogue machines of the beginning of last century is surely represented by the fi gure of Albert Einstein.

If we were capable of building a machine (computer) with mne-monic circuits, prevalently constituted by the elements Ca,He and Si, where there would be an interaction between them according to analogue schemes (thus drawing potential information from one to the other, and information of the syntony from its surrounding environment), the same would very probably be able to simulate hu-man intelligence even before reaching the 1000 terafl ops velocity of elaboration of information. Apart from such velocity, the idea that the same could start to power itself would not be ruled out. In that case it will no longer be enough to ...“unplug it “to deactivate it; why would that be so? People, if a plant was able to feed itself by drawing all the necessary energy exclusively from the sun’s rays...it would grow legs. Anyhow, a computer, as “powerful” as it could be, since it is a closed energetic structure, will never be able to modify its physical confi guration (that is to autonomously generate other parts, which have been added or substituted to its own physical model).

If the analogues weren’t the basis of all potential information, constituting the facet we are offered in the classic Newtonian reality, we would surely not be able to diagnose any disease by observing the iris of the eye of a human being which is affected by such illness or cutaneous anomalies on one of his ears (that is the image of the human fetus as analogue base and therefore all to be deciphered and interpreted) nor to foresee a potential future by observing the casual disposition of the Tarots. Even in randomness there is an intrinsic order (as it has been discovered in the last years by studies carried out on the behaviour of chaos), this means that the same must necessar-ily represent a symbolic image (belonging to the Newtonian reality) of a potential predefi ned spatio temporal continuum, in which it is possible to catch a sight of past, present and future events. The same thing applies for the chaotic aspect normally lining dreams. The only


80

difference between dreams and synchronism is that the fi rst is created from a quantum reality and it solely manifests itself in such reality, whilst the second, synchronism, also fundamentally arises from a quantum reality but manifesting itself at some time distance in all of its completeness as in the classic Newtonian reality. Dreams and synchronisms, therefore represent a symbolic image (which is all to be deciphered) by the events which have characterized in the past, characterize in the present and will characterize our life in the future. With the increase of degree (velocity) analogue information of hu-man thought, would not at all be risky to believe that with the passing of thousands of years, the vast majority of humanity will fi nally be able to access the marvels of clairvoyance and many other marvels belonging to the reign (so far) of ...the paranormal. Perhaps in a few thousands of years, many individuals will be able to scrutinize, apart from his own future and that of a few others, even the one of the whole of humanity.

Let’s now consider a human being whose beauty stands out thanks to his perfect harmony and symmetry of all of his features (macro-scopic beauty) and thanks to the perfect “cellular symmetry” which characterizes all of its organism, which is obviously clear to our eyes, only at a cutaneous level (microscopic beauty)*14. If it is true that po-tential information loves to integrate itself mainly in physical entities endowed with a remarkable symmetry between its components, the value of potential information inborn in this individual will have to be rather vast with respect to several other people who endowed with discrete beauty. Admitting that the interaction on a quantum scale subsists between dynamic information (rational conscience) and that the potential one (unconscious) innate in the mind-body system of each individual could also extend to its surrounding environment, it

*14 A few months-old child therefore, because it has an extremely elevated micro-scopic beauty and usually also a certain amount of macroscopic beauty, must necessarily be constituted by an amount of potential information which is far superior than any other adult human being, thus able to considerably attract its own resonance of dynamic information. Such argument would explain why a baby of a few months has a rational conscience which is extremely limited...he still mainly lives in a dream world..


81

could easily be deducted that the dynamic information of each indi-vidual leans towards being attracted (more than by its own potential information, if this does not have a suffi ciently high value), by the considerable potential of information situated in individuals who are endowed with a certain macro-microscopic beauty. (A good analogy with this phenomenon can be extracted from the General Theory of Relativity, which states that small masses are attracted to bigger ones). This probably explains in “quantum terms” how physical at-traction arises (or sexual impulse) towards a member of the other sex...that is how pain actually arises. Between two individuals who are endowed with the same quantity (or value) of dynamic information, sometimes the phenomenon called love takes shape…The concept of an existing dynamic information, that is of an imponderable entity which transcends each defi nition of quantum order (meaning cat-egory), able to organize itself through chaotic structures prevalently constituted by potential information (that is by complex or dispersive forms of energy), it is identifi able by the one slightly more archaic which is simply expressed with the word ...soul. In the phenomenon called love, what is known as “soul mate”, is represented by a deter-mined model of dynamic information, exactly similar to the model of dynamic information which if met, it is destined to be united (and when this happens, there is no Saint in Heaven who is able to prevent it from happening). The same applies to friendships... obviously the sincere ones.

In theory, “beautiful” people should therefore have a much more invasive unconscious in comparison to people of discrete beauty, thus rather closer to the ...dream world. Considering that this world is much closer to a fantastic-virtual reality more than a purely physical reality, and the same will therefore exercise a rather strong attrac-tion on its own resonance of dynamic information (more precisely on the resonance fl owing from it). A good analogy able to perfectly mirror this argument, can be derived once again by the theory of General Relativity, which claims that the intensity of a gravitational fi eld, increases with the increase of mass; in this case, mass should obviously be identifi ed with the unconscious (potential informa-tion). The subconscious therefore, is no longer to be considered as an innate entity exclusively in the brain of a human being, but as


82

an entity which constitutes the entire human body thus consisting of potential information. Presuming that the level of human intel-ligence (understood as the speed of elaborating information in a prevalently analogue way) is directly proportional to the level (or value) of dynamic information which defi nitely constitutes the mind of an individual (soul), we can easily understand why people who are “too beautiful” are almost never endowed with great intelligence. Someone could rightly ask himself: But how is it possible that people who are endowed with great intelligence, feel great physical attraction (as in sexual impulse) towards members of the opposite sex character-ized by remarkable beauty, even when they actually recognize that the same are of a rather relevant stupidity?

Well, this is a natural phenomenon which often happens, but it should be remembered that it is only dynamic information (rational conscience) which happens to be attracted by individuals who are en-dowed with such remarkable beauty. In such context, the important conscience (potential information) role of the individual endowed with a great intelligence emerges. The subconscious of the same, since it is closer to the physical reality of things, and since it also exercises a scant attraction on its own resonance constituted by dy-namic information, is able to “communicate” better with the latest thus making it aware of the risks and dangers it would meet if it ac-cepted to fall into the arms of Venus. (Have you ever actually asked yourselves why in the arms of a beautiful woman we seem to have the feeling that we are more stupid than we usually are? Well, it isn’t just a sensation…it is that we actually become more stupid).

Everything which I have so far set forth represents the rule. The exception, (even if to many, it would appear to be a paradox) is due to the fact that in the world, there are also several extremely “ugly” who are also extremely stupid people, as well as the fact that there are several rather beautiful people who are also much more intelligent. These are nature’s mysteries.

We should therefore not forget that in the society in which we live, sometimes, in order to survive, people are actually forced to pretend they are stupid, when in reality they aren’t, or vice versa intelligent, when in reality they are actually stupid. Letting ourselves be trans-


83

ported by this stupid reversal of roles, created by the most developed civilizations of this planet, means to live in perfect disharmony with our own biological structure and with our surrounding environment; and when the soul suffers (that is, when the dynamic information is determined not to follow the advice of the subconscious), the syn-chronisms of life start to decrease, leaving room to an ever increasing and conspicuous amount of incidents and psychophysical illnesses (illnesses are always psychophysical, there are no such things as uniquely physical or uniquely psychic illnesses). When pain becomes too great to be bearable, the soul normally manifests the will to leave this material and insignifi cant world (as this is how it appears to a struggling soul), thus materializing through cancer or suicide.

Sexual desire, I believe arises out of an intrinsic necessity of dynamic information to constantly maintain a determined tension and intensity, able to ensure a perfect balance with all the potential information with which it principally interacts (body) and with the information of syntony of its surrounding environment. It must be remembered that the information of syntony is constituted by the potential information of each physical entity (that is the innate one which can also be found in stones), more than that of the collective dynamic (Jung defi ned it as the “collective subconscious”, however, as I have already used the term “subconscious” to defi ne the potential information of a human being, it would be rather a contradiction to use it once more in order to defi ne the collective dynamic informa-tion …represented by the soul of human beings who are still alive or who died centuries ago). Any illness or psychophysical disorder, therefore fundamentally originates by a constant “missed target” of such equilibrium. This latest observation, as many could notice, is in perfect syntony with the basics of Freudian psychoanalysis. When the dynamic information (anima) of an individual, “imposes itself” in order to reach a determined objective, it normally tends to suffocate his sexual instinct in order to reach a determined tension-intensity (defi ned by a complex dynamic-organizing scheme), able to spark off all the elaborating processes analogical to the information of syntony, which will therefore let it reach a level of intelligence necessary for the achieving its fi nal scope of his worldly existence.


84

The fi nal scope of the soul, pre-defi ned the instant when it decides to reincarnate itself, that is the moment in which the fetus has already reached a certain dimension, could be for example, to understand how it must feel to live an existence in extreme poverty and suffering, or how it must feel to be extremely rich; it could be to understand how it must feel to deeply love someone as well as to be deeply loved, as well as realizing how a Don Giovanni who totally dedicates his life to a mundane life and promiscuous sex, to understand what it feels like to be a celebrity…but sometimes, who knows for which reason, the soul changes its mind and decides to go back to the afterlife; if this happens in the fi rst three months of his life (and it is normally the case, because it is rare that the soul decides to spontaneously leave his own body after ten, twenty or thirty years of life .., such phenom-enon is normally accepted (more than explained) by the scientifi c orthodox community and defi ned with the term: white death. How-ever, if this happens at a later stage, the same is (as it logically would be) considered as something which is not natural, rather mysterious and thus obviously scientifi cally unexplainable. We could therefore accept the idea that the soul in such cases wants to experiment what is normally felt when enacting a suicide, or how it feels to die after being run over a car or killed by a gunshot; but with diffi culty we can have an idea of why the soul, in very rare cases decides to leave its own body in a spontaneous and natural way. Maybe there is a kind of suffering which is so great (even when the body appears to be in a perfect physical state), which obviously the soul has decided to experi-ment in the same day of its own reincarnation, able to make it abandon a biologically functioning body, for ever or for a determining temporal interval, in a spontaneous and natural way. How could we otherwise explain the death of individuals submitted to atrocious torturing even though the moment when the soul detaches itself, they still have a biologically functioning body? It isn’t at all diffi cult to imagine for what reason the souls of these individuals almost never come back to the physical reality.

It may seem to be an absurd idea, but when a soul decides to rein-carnate itself is as if it has decided to continue suffering…to continue learning again. But to learn what? Somebody may surely ask. Who is the one who moves the strings of this stupid game of human exist-


85

ence? I really believe that we will not discover it, even when we will go to heaven, as it may be that not even God understands the scope of his existence. Consider for an instance, the fantastic hypothesis that the images of a determined videogame could leave the screen of your PC and communicate with you, they would obviously be baffl ed when they learned their “real” physical reality and the scope of their existence. In front of the omniscient God who has created them (more precisely you) and would be able to make them disappear into thin air when and how he wishes, they would surely accept with their head down, their condition of inferiority and ignorance. What emerges from such considerations is as follows: if they (the images) are not at all aware of the fact that you are not omniscent beings, you yourselves, in any case actually are (aware). And if our Universe, that is God, was aware of the fact that he is not an Omniscent Be-ing? Who stands on the other side of our Universe and moves his strings? And if there still was “someone” apart from The One who is on the other side of our Universe? This is how we actually get to the concept of Infi nity, a concept over which no kind of potential or dynamic information can actually reach. Even if we tried to conceive the concept of Void of Information, the same having been created by us, must necessarily exist. Inexistance cannot exist.

Let’s take again into consideration the human model, as a ba-sis of the conceptual development of the mechanics of Information, that is of the natural principles which regulate the infi nite schemes of interaction between all the holo-energetic layers constituting the entire Universe.

The process of aging of a human being, fundamentally begins the moment when he is taken from his mother’s womb and brought to the light of the earthly reality. If we consider such process, as a continuous and inexorable breaking of cellular symmetries, the same, in substance would represent nothing but a consequence of the second principle of thermodynamics (entropic). Now, if we assume that dynamic information (rational conscience) of a human being could develop and continue to increase, only with the happening of a progressive detachment from its own potential information (physi-cal body) from which it is contantly generated, we could assume that


86

such phenomenon is strictly correlated to the entropic principle. If we generalize, we come to the conclusion that human intelligence does not follow the principle of entropy in the common term sense, thus constantly heading towards a major state of disorder (or dis-organization), but it follows it in an inversely proportional way; that is that the same grows with the increase of the energetic disorder. Therefore, if the Universe is going towards an inevitable thermic death, the dynamic information which continues at the same rate, to develop and increase (with the passing of the milleniums), through the evolution of thousands and thousands of animal species (which populate our planet and probably several others in other galaxies and solar systems), is going towards the perfect organization, towards the Great Unifi cation…or as Tipler would say, towards the Omega Point.

It has now been known for a long time (thanks to the work of S.Grof), that the intake of determined doses of LSD on behalf of individuals who have no apparent psycho-physical disorder, is able to take such people to live experiences in which their potential in-formation (i.p.) strongly prevails upon the dynamic one (i.d.). Such phenomenon, could therefore essentially be due to possible causes relating to a temporary alteration of their i.p.: the fi rst consists in a possible amplifi cation of the power of attraction of the i.p., on the dynamic one; the second, a possible decrease of the production of such resonance (i.d.) on behalf of the i.p.

It is rather probably that the fi rst cause (that is the amplifi cation of the power of attraction of the i.p.), is nearest to the actual reality of things. In fact, if the i.d. didn’t have, during the interval of time which is englobed in the i.p. (due to the effect of LSD), a rather high value of tension-intensity, the same would not be able to interact productively [during a determined interval of time (included in the broadest one defi ned by the intake of the specifi ed drug) in which the regressive hypnosis is applied],with its own i.p. and neither with the dynamic one of the old fashioned one (that is the one constituted by the sum of dynamic information of previous lives) englobed in the same (in the i.p.) right from the day when the individual under discussion was born; and therefore any memory regarding the period


87

previous to their birth could not emerge in the physical reality (that is when he was still in the womb) as well as any memory going back to distant past lives.

“Each emotional state causes a modifi cation of the conscience, modifi cation which Pierre Janet defi ned as “abaissement du niveau mental”: which means that a certain shrinking of the subconscious takes place and at the same time a strengthening of the conscience, as many profanes in the subject can easily note, especially in the presence of intense beloved ones. The tone of the subconscious increases to a certain measure, which easily provokes a gradient from the subcon-scious to the conscience. As a consequence, the conscience falls under the infl uence of impulses and instinctive contained contents”.

CARL GUSTAV JUNG

Such observations, remain in any case, simple hypotheses, as it should not be excluded the fact that dynamic information, during an experience arising from the intaking of LSD, is effectively produced or generated) by the i.p. at rather reduced quantities. Or if the two phenomenon (amplifi cation of the power of attraction of the i.p. + decrease of the capacity of production of the i.d. on behalf of the i.p.), happen, during such experiences, contemporaneously.

Considering the fact that the entropy (ΔS) of a system, increases when the energy increases (ΔE) ;the relationship ΔE/ΔS (that is the one deriving from energy with respect to the entropy) will therefore represent an important quantity which we will name with the letter T. At this point, identifying T with the absolute temperature we will obtain:

Eq.1 T = 1 . ΔE ; where K is Boltzmann’s constant K ΔS

Assuming that E = (i.p) . (i.d) , that is that energy is the same to the product of potential information for that dynamic, we will obtain the following equation:


88

Eq.2 (i.d) = E = T . K . ΔS i.p i.p

We notice, by observing the last equation, that with the increas-ing of the value of the entropy (ΔS), we have a proportional increase of dynamic information. Such equation, brings to validate more of Tipler’s hypothesis on the “fi nal reaching” of the Omega Point.

The activity of the brain of a human being, is defi ned on the basis of the quantity and type of electromagnetic waves which the same emanates and also emanates to its surrounding environment. Such waves, are constituted by an immense number of particles of energy which are endlessly small and which are scattered in the environment where the individual under discussion is situated. These particles, are however, fundamentally constituted by potential information. Assuming (as we have previously supposed) that the dynamic infor-mation is constantly generated by the potential information, it could even be deducted that the above mentioned particles, are “shielded” by a certain quantity of dynamic information (obviously unobserv-able and not quantifi able by any physical instrument); that is that the same are “enclosed” in a very fi ne “spheric layer” of dynamic information. This is how we inevitably get to the concept of collec-tive dynamic information (or collective subconscious, as Jung would have defi ned it).

The soul of a human being (that is its own dynamic information),is therefore conceivable as something dynamic which regenerates con-stantly and which scatters in the environment (still probably remain-ing linked to the body-source) which surrounds the same.

The collective dynamic information, will therefore have to be con-stituted by a percentage of “human thoughts” (that is of “thoughts” of human beings which are still alive) and by a remaining percentage of dynamic information constituted by complete-complex forms of “human thoughts” (that is of souls belonging to deceased human beings). Obviously we only arrive at such conclusion if we accept the hypothesis that dynamic information of a human being, the moment in which all his vital organs stop working, is still able to organize itself perfectly, thus assuming a rather complex form, and therefore


89

automatically disassociate from the potential information which has constantly generated it.

What human beings normally defi ne with the term of : “suffer-ing”, is nothing but a condition of imbalance of a system i.d - i.p, or of a system i.d -i.d, or rather of a system i.p - i.p.(If we pour half a litre of water at a temperature of 60° C,in a litre of water of only 10°, the system i.p- i.p considered, will suffer only until it does not reach the thermic balance. You must bear in mind that such system consists in half a litre of water (i.p) and a litre of water + its surrounding environment, the sum which once again equals to i.p).

If we take in consideration a single “thinking” biological entity, such system will therefore be constituted by the following compo-nents: mind (soul o i.d) - body (i.p) – its surrounding environment (i.p + i.d)*15.

Each biologic entity, represents a small integrating part of the system i.d - i.p which constitutes the entire Universe. In a human being, any psychic crowd (from schizophrenia to depression), is fun-damentally due to a condition of imbalance of the system : [mind - body – surrounding environment]. A determined kind of suffering, for a common human being, can even last for the duration of his entire life, if he does not try to put a minimum effort into follow-ing the “advice” of his subconscious (i.p) and to therefore fi nd the “right” environment which would help it live quietly. Obviously, it isn’t always possible to “freely move” when and how we wish to; but the subconscious (conceivable as an antenna which is constantly able to absorb the information of syntony) if we “listened” to in the best of ways, is able to supply us the indications/solutions necessary to leave a determined condition of energic imbalance. Such indications, if followed “by the letter”, don’t always have an immediate effect; actually, in the majority of cases, it is necessary to spend tens of years

*15 Let’s not forget about the fact that on Earth, the surrounding environment on the biologic entità taken into consideration, is constituted by endless biologic entities which are “highly thinking” (human beings) and by several other bio-logic entities which are less evolved (animal and vegetal); therefore, an environ-ment which is rich of dynamic information.


90

to be able to fi nd that perfect harmony which was lost or actually never “enjoyed” since birth.

Generally people with the higher predisposition to suffering are those: who are either very stupid, or “too intelligent”. And unfor-tunately, this is due to the fact that the entire human civilization is mainly constituted by people with mediocre intelligence.

When the dynamic information of a human being is not able to communicate with his own body (i.p or subconscious, however we wish to call it), the waiting time to leave a determined condition of imbalance (suffering) reveal to be too long for the individual under discussion (everything depends upon the intensity of the dynamic information: the greater it is, and the more it will be able to stand the waiting times which get longer), and inevitably illnesses such as cancer or the act of extreme suicide will follow.

The condition of energetic imbalance of the system i.p-i.d inher-ent to an animal species (for example the human one) solely ends the moment when the same extinguishes itself. Terrestrial Paradise cannot exist, as it would go against the second principle of thermo-dynamics. The only condition of absolute balance is the one defi ned exclusively by dynamic information. If the human soul wasn’t con-stantly searching for absolute balance, it wouldn’t have fought wars for thousands of years, fi nally creating the atomic bomb.

Dawkins is right to support that human genes (DNA) behave in a

selfi sh way; the only system which the dynamic information of a spe-cies has available, in order to reach its fi nal scope (that is the absolute equilibrium), is that to induce the genes to assume a selfi sh behaviour, by selecting them in favour to a higher intelligence (conceivable as a higher dynamic tension ... the dynamic information of the Universe is a child who is slowly growing). The human species will anyhow be destined to go through the stages of energetic balance, perhaps ac-cording to intervals of cyclic time more or less regular; forasmuch the selfi shness of our genes, with time, will learn to conceal itself so as to make the existence of individuals less of a suffering and that they may sweetly be led towards the absolute balance. When everything ends, we will perhaps not even realize it.


91

No one here gets out alive

What is commonly defi ned as “subjective will” (relating to an individual), is nothing but a complex game of cause-effect (and its origins are lost in ancient times) of a system, whose components take the name of: mind – body – its surrounding environment. Each choice or decision which each human being is “forced”*16 to take each day in the course of his life, is the result of an exchange of information between the components: mind – body – its surround-ing environment, of the system in which he belongs, in accordance with the principle of thermo-dynamics*17. A human being is always looking for someone who understands him, because a reciprocal un-derstanding is nothing but an exchange of information (dynamic for friendships; and dynamic + potential between two people who love each other in a most profound and intimate way...therefore including the one between two homosexuals) necessary to achieve a determined balance in the system [mind – body – its surrounding environment] of an individual.

A good level of energetic balance can be reached by frequently going to your psychoanalyst…providing that he is able to understand you (for example, they just make me feel irritable) whilst the optimal one can be solely reached if one has the immense luck to fi nd true love, more precisely the perfect harmony which arises from a total exchange of information. There is no lethal illness for a human be-ing, if he is permitted to cure himself just with the power of love.

*16 To make an example, because I like blond women, this is perhaps due to the fact that in many previous lives I married women with light hair (…and with time I have realized that they only bring trouble) Taste does not arise from nothing; each effect has its cause.

*17 But because this context also involves dynamic information, it would be neces-sary to talk about the second principle of thermal-mind-dynamic.


92

THE SYNCHRO ENERGY EXPERIMENT

“As in memory where distant facts constellate, forming twirls in the fl ux of memories, so it is in life where vortexes open up and rotate

repotted in coincidence, in an unexplainable simultaneity. They are elements which should be divided by time and space. Pure marvel

arises out of those living in such instances: an aura is given off by such overlappings. It reminds us of the metaphor of scholastics: the

angels that are out of the river of time, once in a while, dip their foot in it. When coincidences happen, it is like catching a glimpse of an

angelic footstep in our world”. ELÉMIRE ZOLLA

From subconscious nucleuses to Synchronicity

A few years ago, I had the chance to meet …by “pure chance”*18, the famous American researcher Brenda Dunne, Manager of the In-stitute and Research Laboratory PEAR (the acronym is translated in: Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research), situated near Princeton University, in New Jersey, USA.

At that time, my thoughts were almost all addressed towards re-search able to unify the concepts of Syncronicity (Jungian), the ones

*18 Whoever knows the basics of the Jungian Theory of Synchronicity, and reco-gnizes in this a good dose of reliability and truthfulness, is also aware of the fact that nothing (…absolutely nothing) happens in the life of any human being by pure chance; but rather that everything has been predefi ned according to some kind of Divine Plan which leaves no room for any casual event. And this is the only reason why I have placed the expression by pure chance in quotation mar-ks.


93

of non-locality and collapse of wave function. That such correlation actually exists, is evidently deduced by analyzing with a minimum of critique all that such principles and theories offer us with their anecdotes, their “speculations”, their “healthy cultural roots” from which they come from and so on; but being able to defi ne the real outlines and fundamental characteristics (perhaps even in mathemat-ical terms) is “a different kettle of fi sh”. I therefore had the chance to discuss such subjects with Dr. Dunne and several members of PEAR. The complexity on the logical-mathematical plaine which obviously arose from wanting to fi nd a theory unifying the three theories men-tioned above, initially generated some kind of impotence added to a frustrating feeling of semi-awareness that we were going to venture into something far “too complex” for some common human minds (like ours, obviously; even if supplied with a good dose of “scien-tifi c wisdom”). We therefore spent a few months trying to unite our strength and to reach to some sound hypothesis that would allow us to come up with some experiments able to demonstrate at least some of the “basic principles” of unifi cation of the three theories at issue (Sincronicity, non-Locality and collapse of wave function).

All our attempts however, proved to be rather unsuccessful. The turning point came, unexpectedly, some time after having unani-mously given up the task of accomplishing “psychic efforts” in a direction which seemed to us almost surreal and perhaps within the limits of “scientifi c common sense”.

The intuition which helped us take the fi rst steps towards a partial actualization of some aspects related to the above mentioned and rather yearned for “unifying theory”, came the moment when I had lost all hope to fi nd any solution (or basic principle) that would be “objectively acceptable” and which could be adopted to the current theoretical model of the concepts at issue. A simple intuition that led me towards the formulation of the following principle (which I named as the Principle of Quantum Compensation of “unconscious nucleus”):“For each annulment of any subconscious energetic nucleus principally defi ned by determined (human) expectations-conditions, there is a determined collapse of the wave function (which defi nes the reality that takes shape around the subject-individual), whose outcome


94

shall be positive or negative, depending on the intensity of the parame-tres of the subjective reality, related to the subconscious nucleus of the subject-individual under discussion”.

What must clearly be defi ned (before any other thing) in such Principle, is the meaning of “subconscious nucleus”.

The idea that such nucleuses are to be exclusively intended in a “fi gurative way” because tendentially we are induced to consign them in a psychologic (and not physical) ambit, is to be excluded from the start. They are therefore to be meant as real and proper energetic structures which could even extend over the volumetric limits of the brain (or simply be found elsewhere, in another part of the human body); this is like quantities of energy that are freed in determined particular conditions and above all physically not quantifi able as they are “integrated” in our electromagnetic fi eld. Beyond this ar-gument, it is also necessary to consider another which is of no less importance; more precisely that such nucleuses surely have (in my opinion) a dualistic nature (that is, they can be intended as proper energetic structures, as well as waves of probability).

Having made some preliminary remarks, in order to tackle what follows such theories, it is anyhow essential that the defi nition of “Principle of quantum compensation of subconscious nucleuses” be clear. First of all, I hope that my research will go beyond the simple “quantum interpretation” of human thought. A question that I have been asked several times on the scientifi c forums on the Internet (Ital-ian, English and American forums which I normally participate in order to divulge my theories for the purpose of understanding what are, in the eyes of the interested reader, the most obscure points contained therein and that therefore require further elucidations) is the following: “What is intended by positive or negative outcomes mentioned in your Principle of subconscious nucleuses ?”

Generally, in order to answer this question, I borrow a brief ex-tract from a text included in one of my books (God=mc2), acting as introduction to one of the latest chapters (Stargate) and therefore acts as an example-anecdote which in my opinion is an excellent way of providing a hint to the answer to a question that appears rather simple but that at the same time is found linked to concepts not so evident and easy to comprehend. The text is as follows:


95

“(…) I see a staircase. At the top of this staircase is a door. What will be behind this door? I shall walk up…here is the door, here am I facing it. I touch the handle. Who knows, will it be open or closed? All I need to do is lightly touch the handle to discover it…and there it is, the door begins to open…The place where I fi nd myself is truly enchanting, maybe it is a good thing being here…even for just a short while, let’s say…a few minutes.

One…two…three…four minutes…now would be better for me to return to the house, it is getting late. I will return tomorrow. I leave. I close the door and walk down the staircase. And here I am the following day. The same staircase; the same door.I walk up the stairs. I am fac-ing the door. Who knows, maybe today it will be open again, or maybe not? It will be enough to lightly touch the handle to discover it…and there it is, the door begins to open… The place where I fi nd myself is still the same. I only stay for three minutes and then leave. I close the door and walk down the stairs.

I will return tomorrow morning. Time passes by…………the fol-lowing day……… Here again, here is the staircase and here is the door. I walk up the stairs. I am in front of the door and think: “It will most probably be open”.

In a rather self-assured way, I touch the handle…and there it is, for the third consecutive time, the door was actually open. I am not at all surprised. Once again, I am in the same place. I stay here for about two minutes. Then I leave, close the door again and walk down the staircase, promising myself to return tomorrow. The next day… Here is the usual staircase and the usual door. I start walking up the stairs. “So, let’s see…today I must go to the barber’s, go to the post offi ce to send some letters, check my e-mail, return my mother’s oven dish…but anyhow, I’ll walk into this wonderful peaceful place of idyllic appearance”. There are only three steps to go and I will be at the door; I can already see myself across the threshold, inside that pleasant place”. I have the unconscious and nearly absolute certainty that in a few instances I will touch the handle and open that door, that nothing and nobody can stand in my way. I give a glimmer of a smile and in a rather decisive way, I lower the door han-dle throwing myself forward with an outburst and…strangely enough…the door is not opened and I nearly hit my head against it.Once again, just as it often happens throughout one’s life (…or more lives), the last


96

pieces of a simple puzzle do not seem to match with its own expecta-tions. The logic of the Universe is far more complex. Each time that our expectations are transformed into something more “solid”, that is, into mental structures which no longer allow for any kind of doubt, and that therefore defi ne a potential future as something not defi nitive, which no longer has potential, as it is nearly completely taken for granted; it is in that precise moment, that all the wave functions that our system (body-mind-soul) has managed to previously collapse in our favour (therefore creating a “positive” reality), completely change direction to give space to a less favourable reality. Do you know what this means? It means that our expectations, our most deepest desires, our stupid fi rm believes and our stupid illusions…make our surrounding reality change in the most unfavourable way!

In such “borderline case”, we could therefore talk about a nega-tive outcome, related to a determined subconscious nucleus (the ab-solute subconscious conviction that the door will be found open). As a matter of fact, the reality shapes through the mutual interaction between these self expectations-convictions (absolute and semi-abso-lute) of each mind-human thought with those of another individual (or “thinking” biological entity) as well as our surrounding lifeless environment, giving rise to the fi nal analysis of the collapse of the wave function related to the system taken in consideration that in turn infl uences the wave function of the entire universe as known by us. The energetic nucleuses that defi ne human expectations-con-victions are comparable (because strictly connected) to the “wave function collapse”, which as a fi nal analysis, defi nes the Reality of things surrounding us. The reason why such expectations-convic-tions, which create true and proper “solid” structures at a physical level (subconscious nucleuses that are dissolvent with diffi culty) give rise to some “negative collapses” of the wave function (in a way that the reality takes shape around the subject in an unfavourable man-ner), is unfortunately still not clear. The lack of solid subconscious nucleuses (which is of strong expectations and convictions in rela-tion to a determined object-context) of an individual, facilitates the occurance of synchronistic events (synchronisms) and gives a cer-tain psycho-physical serenity to the subject under discussion. What


97

must be remembered is that all the work carried out by a serious and intelligent psychotherapist during any sitting with his respective “patient” is nothing but an exchange of information, performed to dissolve (thanks to a change of perspective proposed by the analyst and sweetly instilled at a conscious-unconscious level in his patient) each useless and badly interpreted expectation-conviction of the lat-est upon the Reality that he believes he lives in. Jung defi ned such rather mentally radicated convictions of some individuals as Con-stellations, and logically speaking, not easily dissolved while patient-analyst work is being carried out.

It was therefore at this point that I managed to catch a glimpse of the fi rst pencil of light towards the fi rst possible experiments that were going to be carried out, in order to demonstrate, at least partly, some principle basics related to the concept of the subconscious nucleuses.

The Synchro Energy Project (SEP), was going to take off, and simply “feeling”, was for me an ineffable emotion. The fi rst experi-ment (in which sixty volunteered to be submitted to the EEG data), was carried out at the beginning of November 2006 in a small labora-tory close to the University of Lausanne (in Switzerland), with the aid of three extraordinary people (who I shall always thank for their patience and above all trust they placed in my ideas-theories since the beginning) and whose names are: Patrick Reiner (theoretical physi-cist), Jean-Michel Bonnet (electronic engineer) and Christine Duval (neuropsychologist and physiologist).

The experiment, rather simple from any point of view, required the following material:

- 89 cards of the Zener typology but lacking any image; all of dif-ferent colours but only on one side, but of the same colour if turned. Such cards are then divided into three distinct colours: twenty-two white cards, sixty-six red ones and only one black card. They are then placed on a table on top of each other (piled up, more precisely on a deck) in such sequence and covered (that is, by showing the rear side): Black – three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white


98

card – three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white card –three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white card – three red cards – a white card (the last card at the end of the deck will therefore be the white one, while the black card will be placed on the table surface, covered by the other eighty eight cards).

-A modular machine (Modul Machine) for electroencephalogram (EEG).

It was also necessary to build (and this is where Jean Michel Bon-net was truly decisive, in order to proceed with the experiment), a bimodal conversion transitional switch (for an inverted signal entry) and to connect the white noise modulator to the high frequency DC generator.

Without this switch, we would not have been able to ensure that the double propeller inherent to the card sequence would extinguish itself. This would have cancelled any stimulus signal inherent to the EEG right from the start.

The experiment consisted in the measuring (in as many as sixty subjects-voluntary individuals) the EEG average frequence (Mc Creery and Claridge, 1996) and Pearson’s Correlation (Rho) between the two emispheres (for delta, theta, alfa, and beta frequences), dur-ing the task of card disposition (in sequence) one next to the other with a relative “uncovering” of the same, until the last card of the deck, the black one. My assumptions (which in the end proved to be founded), were substantially as follows: the subject under discussion, during the experiment, should have created-generated a simple ener-getic subconscious nucleus (due to the gradual consolidation of his expectations on the regular sequence of colours of the cards), which would have remained “hidden” (thanks to a regular-ordinary oscilla-


99

tion of frequency of his EEG) until the moment of his uncovering of the last card (whose colour black was obviously in net constrast with the regular sequence of colours of the remainder of the cards).

At such point, the precise moment in which the last card (the black one) was to be uncovered, the surprise when observing-ascertaining that the latest had nothing to do with the ordinary sequence of the previously extracted cards, should have immediately “destroyed” that simple energetic subconscious nucleus (self-generated through a gradual consolidation of expectations on the regular sequence of the colour of cards) producing a high frequency anomalous wave (to the limit of the Beta band) that should have been registered in the EEG analysis.

More “Nuclearised” expectations we’ll have (on the sequential succession of the cards) at a subconscious level in the subject and more evident will be the peak of the “anomalous wave” which will originate from the dissolution of such temporary subconscious nu-cleus, the moment in which the “anomalous card” is uncovered (in contrast with the sequential scheme of the previous cards).

The results of such experiment, in as many as 42 subjects over sixty, showed some anomalous peaks in a range of between 30 and 30,5 Hz, in relation to the uncovering of the last card. Instead, Pear-son’s Correlation, showed in such subjects (42) a sudden decrease of coherence between the two emispheres, the precise moment when the last card was being uncovered.

Even if my hypothesis was revealed to be founded, this simple experiment still wasn’t demonstrating the effective existence of “sub-conscious nucleuses”, but in some way led us towards assuming it. In fact, even uffi cial science admits that unexpected stimuli (in this case, the card which was not in sequence) can generate neurophysiological reactions which are cerebral or not but from this, nothing I wished to prove was not deduced.

Another decisive turning point came the moment I felt something which was rather more important, in relation to a particular electro-magnetic fi eld, more precisely the heart.

What I had to do initially was to transform the following hy-pothesis-supposition in some kind of “fact” through a logical (not experimental) analysis related to a system which is unfortunately not


100

well known: the human electromagnetic fi eld and the various interac-tions with cerebral waves of the same individual. The hypothesis that I formulated was the following: The dimension of the heart’s toroidal electromagnetic fi eld is only and exclusively amplifi ed during the disso-lution of the subconscious nucleus but not in the case of an “anomalous peak” of the EEG due to a simple temporary emotion.

Such hypothesis has its roots in the fact that no energetic sub-conscious nucleus can exist, situated in areas that are rather distant from our brain, able to dissolve only and exclusively through cerebral waves. Chinese medicine, based on the manipulation of determined physical areas of an individual, fi nds the solution to determined psy-cho-physiological problems (for example acupuncture) leads towards the confi rmation of such hypothesis without a shadow of a doubt (thanks to its two thousand years of history) and in my opinion turns it into a “fact”.

Even if such considerations, claimed by a theoretical physicist, could almost appear to be blasphemous (especially in the eyes of any physicist-scientist who is absolutely faithful to the academic consen-sus and therefore as a principle is contrary to consider-evaluate any hypothesis which could appear to them as “rather unorthodox”), I am still of the opinion that they will sooner or later have to be revalu-ated, even by the most sceptical subjects so that they may fi nally be endowed with a worthy and well-deserved importance which unfor-tunately for the past two thousand years, prevalently seems to be a prerogative of the eastern world.

What I shall therefore expose from now on regarding the follow-ing experiments on subconscious nucleuses makes sense only and if it is considered as proper argument and basis of my latest consid-eration (exposed in bold letters above); otherwise everything shall inevitably lose credibility and meaning.

The heart’s magnetic fi eld is approximately 5000 times more pow-erful than the one produced by the brain, but it isn’t hampered by tissues and can be measured even at a distance from the body with an Quantum Intereference Superconducting Instrument (SQUID) that is based on magnetometres. I will now refer to the experiment proposed to PEAR, and can say that it is possible to establish a link between the EEG “anomalous peak” at the moment of the dissolving


101

of a subconscious nucleus (generated by a determined subconscious constellation), and width of the Toroidal CEM (Toroidal CEM = body’s electromagnetic fi eld, generated by the heart whose geometry is in the shape of a Torus). The dimension of the Toroidal CEM var-ies from a minimum of 2,5 and a maximum of three metres (with a vertical axis centred in the heart); by measuring the relationship be-tween the “anomalous peak” of the EEG at the moment of dissolv-ing a subconscious nucleus and the value of its dimention (width) of the Toroidal CEM (also carried out during the dissolving of a subconscious nucleus) a constant value should be obtained. (EEG / SQUID = K).

My principle supposition (even in this case later confi rmed by our experiments), was that the Toroidal CEM slightly increased in width, at the moment of the EEG “anomalous peak” due to the an-nihilation of a determined subconscious nucleus.

As we have previously seen, it is true that science admits the pos-sibility of anomalous waves during a determined event touching the emotional centre of an individual; however, if we place a SQUID measurement next to the EEG measurement carried out during a dissolving event of a subconscious nucleus, it is possible to ascertain which anomalous waves are due to a simple temporary emotion and which are due to the annihilation of a subconscious nucleus. And the reason is a simple one:

The dimention of the Toroidal CEM is amplifi ed only and ex-clusively during the dissolving of a subconscious nucleus but not in the case of the EEG “anomalous peak” due to a simple temporary emotion!

Therefore, by carrying out two parallel experiments (with meas-ures SQUID and EEG side by side), one foresees an EEG “anom-alous peak” due to the dissolving of a subconscious nucleus and one foresees an EEG “anomalous peak” due to a simple temporary emotion; and if we fi nally calculate the values gathered by the EEG/SQUID relationship in these two pieces of data, it will be possible to gather the following: the only values that will defi ne a constant will only be the ones gathered by the EEG/SQUID relationship in the “anomalous peaks” experiment generated by the dissolving of a subconscious nucleus.


102

In the beginning of February 2007, we started with the second phase of the Synchro Energy Project. First of all we created two groups of volunteers, each of 60 people, 120 people in total.

The fi rst group was submitted to the experiment with 89 cards by placing the statistic data next to the EEG (electroencephalog-raphy) data and SQUID (magneto-cardiography) data; the second group was also submitted to the experiment (with the statistic data next to the EEG and SQUID data) but with an additional “char-acteristic” compared to the fi rst group, more precisely: during the quiet session in which the subject had to uncover one card after another, approximately thirty seconds after he started carrying out the operation, a cap gun shot was being fi red (obviously without the subject’s prior knowledge) right behind his shoulders, a few metres distance*19 away.

The fi rst gratifi cation was reached when I ascertained that the results related to the fi rst group confi rmed (with a relatively low margin of error) the hypothesis of a constant value (K) gathered by the EEG/SQUID relationship in the case of “dissolving” actual subconscious nucleuses. The most impressive gathering was the fact that the Toroidal CEM of subjects belonging to the fi rst group, once ampliefi ed (in the measure of a few centimetres) during the extrac-tion of the last card (in 39 subjects over sixty) it took approximately 40-50 minutes for each individual’s values to return to the standard (ordinary). This we were able to verify thanks to four volunteers who accepted to remain under observation a few hours longer than the standard duration of the experiment.

The second and fi nal gratifi cation was when I ascertained (once again confermed by my hypothesis) that during a simple temporary emotion (induced in subjects belonging to the second group with the unexpected fi ring of a cap gun shot), the Toroidal CEM practically remained unchanged.

*19 Jean Michel was almost always the person to carry out such “thankless task” which consisted in secretly fi ring the cap gun shot at the right time. Even now, when I remind him about that phase of the experiment, even if jokingly, he observes that it wasn’t at all fun being insulted in several ways when faced with “rather unsociable” individuals.


103

However, at this point, a careful reader could undoubtedly ask the following question (which is completely legitimate and pertinent to the core argument in question, defi ned by an starting point which set itself to fi nd a meeting point between the Jungian Theory of Synchronicity, the Principle of Non Locality and the collapse of wave function), more precisely: “But what does the dissolving of a subconscious nucleus have to do with the Theory of Synchronicity?”

Each synchronistic (or synchronic) event is characterized by the fact that during each manifestation, the subject placed in such “mu-tations of perspective”experiences on the reality of things (which he interprets according to his own subjective parametres) essentially de-fi ned by determined schemes (subconscious nucleuses) where several expectations normally tend to weaken, a “spiritual growth”.

I realize that we are still rather far from fi nding a true theory able to unify the concepts of Synchronicity, Non Locality and col-lapse of wave function; but the fact that we were able to fi nd actual correlations between several aspects-consequences of the theory of Synchronicity and my theory of subconscious nucleuses (which were proved by the results carried out on the Synchro Energy Project) should lead us to believe that perhaps we are on the right path to one day reaching something more vast and concrete.

A dear memento by Brenda and Robert:


104

The SQUID Magnetometer

The quantum interference superconducting device (SQUID) con-sists in two superconductors separated by fi ne layers which form two parallel joints as the Josephson type. The device can be confi gurated as a magnometre to obtain incredibly small magnetic fi elds from living beings.

The fi eld limit (or “threshold”) for such (SQUID) device, equals to 10-14 T. The magnetic fi eld of the heart, on the other hand, equals to 10-10 T; while the one of the brain equals to 10-13 T. The great sensibility of SQUID devices is associated to changes in measure-ments in a magnetic fi eld connected to a quantum fl ux. One of the discoveries connected to Josephson’s junctions was that the tha fl ux is quantized in the following units:


105

If a constant “in excess” fl ux of current is kept within the SQUID device, the tension (voltage) measured oscillates with the changes of phases in the two junctions, thus depending on the change of magnetic fl ux.

Meditation, a “remedy” for retrocausality?

To conclude with a “touch of mystery” this disseminatory exposi-tion on the Principle of quantum compensation of subconscious nu-cleuses and its various correlations with the theory of Synchronicity and the collapse of wave function, I would now like to take in con-sideration an “element” that has so far been excluded in this context but that has a lot to do with it because it also reveals an important factor that is not indifferent, especially if placed aside the principle of Retrocausality. This “element”, is nothing but a particular state of our conscious: the meditative one.

Not so long ago, I had the pleasure to discuss such matter with Cinzia Turnaturi (cited in the beginning of this book, within the Acknowledgment section), who is an Italian expert on meditation techniques and Buddhist phylosophy. I must say that had I not considered her hypothesis-opinions on the interaction between the meditative state and principle of retrocausality rather uninteresting, I obviously would not have included our brief “exchange of views” in this volume.

If it is true that our mind alters reality (“I cannot believe that the moon exists only because I observe it” – claimed Albert Einstein when discussing upon issues inherent to the collapse of wave function), and if it true that meditation (yoga,zen,…) “alters” the mind (that is, it produces non-ordinary mental states) it follows, from a logical point of view, that meditation is to be considered as a factor-vector in the process of “altering” reality (vulgarly: meditation indirectly “alters” reality). Who is or what is in the end that makes the wave function


106

collapse? The observer or the observed (whether it is an animated or lifeless body)? …well, until today, no one has been able to fi nd some defi nite answers to such question.

The reality is simply …Maya, which is something that no hu-man being will ever be able to know its “inner nature”; in the past we believed that mass and energy were two distinct things but in the beginning of the last century, uncle Albert changed the rules. Then towards the second half of the last century, theories of Information (Shannon;Bekenstein) appeared…but nowadays we know that en-ergy is nothing but a complex form of Information. The day we will discover what it actually is and fundamentally, what information is, we will surely be able to claim that we have reached a great aim (…about the “defi nition of reality”).

According to Turnaturi: “Meditation modifi es reality in a way that it erases the distortion caused by the non meditative state. In other words, it does not modify reality but makes it real, which means it makes it what it actually is.

It is the non meditative state that modifi es reality. Reality cannot be defi ned because reality is an experience and in order to experience something, the mind must be placed on one side; and how can you use the mind to defi ne one thing which excludes the mind? When I say that it is the non meditative state to modify reality, I mean that it is the mind which modifi es it. When we observe reality through the mind, we have a distorted image of it and we observe it directly with the non functioning mind so reality appears the way it actually is. Furthermore, observing reality with the fi lter of the mind, is like observing it in play-back; our perception takes place a few instances after things have actually hap-pened. However, when we observe things without the mind, phenomena are seized the instant they happen. My “research” tells me that not only the past modifi es the future (the mind is past) but also that the future modifi es the past.

In the last years, thorough research has demonstrated the exist-ence of retrocausality: situations whose causes have been collocated in the future and information actually moving back time. This work suggests that inserting such information in the decisional processes


107

for the purpose of governing the present in the most effi cient and effective way. The most famous demonstrations on retrocausality have been produced by:

• PEAR (Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research) which, by studying the interaction between mind/machine, has demonstrated the possibility to modify the functioning of generators of casual numbers with a simple intentionality (Jahn e Dunne 2005). In these experiments, the anomalous interaction between mind-machine ap-pears to be more enhanced in the retrocausal modality PRP (Pre-cognitive Remote Perception), reaching a signifi cant result (risk of error) of p=0,000002 (Nelson 1988).

•The Cognitive Science Laboratory studied powerful stimuluses and discovered the existence of a cutaneous reply of 3 seconds (James 2003), with statistical signifi cance (risk of error) of p=0,00054.

• Radin and Bierman (1997) demonstrated that the advance reply of the autonomous nervous system and cutaneous conduction can be used as prediction agents for future experiences.

• Parkhomtchouck (2002) used FMRI (functional magnetic reso-nance imaging) to study Retrocausality.

All the above research has demonstrated that emotions consti-tute the main vehicle of retrocausality and information which come from the future. Luigi Fantappiè in 1942 came to the same conclu-sion, when he found the connection between the negative solution of Dirac’s equation, syntropy and emotions (Fantappiè 1993). Chris King (1989) links retrocausality to free will and claims that in each moment, life must choose between Information coming from the past and Information coming from the future. According to King, this activity of constant choices, such basic indeterminism gives rise to the learning process and conscience. King highlights that subject conscience is a necessary consequence of supercausality arising from the union of ordinary causality with retrocausality. (King 2003).


108

Turnaturi: “If ordinary causality and retrocausality are determined by thought, thought is therefore what makes us conscious of our indi-viduality. In fact, without thought, one loses his individuality and walks into the universal consciousness. It is desire that transforms the posi-tive into negative. Furthermore, we have always been asking ourselves why things go wrong. We are the masters of our unfavourable reality. As a scientist, you talk about the collapse of a wave function, as a profane, I talk about thought as “action” and just like any action, it provokes opposite answers. To make myself understood, I could make a comparison with tug-of-war. If I try to push you down, you react the opposite way.

The Buddhist philosopher says that the world is our own “creation”, in a way that it is our thoughts which model the world, according to our expectations and there are as many worlds as there are minds. Tras-cending the mind means to observe the only world (the only reality) that at that point is the same for everybody. “Observing” the world through thoughts means to build a world which is all your own and which will inevitably crash with the world of other human beings.

The rational conscious is relative because it does not let us see the whole picture but just one side of it. The rational mind creates opposites and can only “see” one at a time. If it sees white, it cannot see black, if it sees the right, it cannot see the wrong and if it sees the bad, it cannot see the good. The rational mind therefore has its limitations and it is almost as it is surrounded by a fence over which it cannot see. Transcending the rational mind (which Buddhism calls ego) means to be able to see in an instance, all the opposites that at that time are no longer opposites but complementary and one cannot exist indipendently from the other. Transcending the rational mind means to seize each positive and negative aspect, all the beauty and ugliness, the good and bad. And it is for this reason that the one who trascends his mind appears to be contradictory or rather crazy; this is because he has freed his mind from the poles imposed by thought thus not allowing him to observe totality. And it is for this reason that it is said that the one who has trascended his mind (the awakened, to be more precise) becomes the universe because he no longer has limits and becomes endless like the universe.

Absolute Reality cannot be demonstrated because it belongs to a subjective experience that lies in the absence of thought; and how can I


109

translate in words (therefore demonstrate) an experience happening in the absence of “words”? Each intuition happens in instants of thought cessation and if you are able to become aware of this, your rational mind transforms it into the “Mind of God”.

From my point of view, meditation produces states of conscious-ness that are not ordinary, which as a result establish (fi x), through the phenomenon of retrocausality, determined life paths from which we cannot “subtract” ourselves as they “cristallize” at a subconscious level, fi xing some “rules” we are not aware of which we are “forced” to follow until the end of our earthly existence. This is undoubtedly one of the concepts requiring further clarifi cation and close exami-nation so that it may lose the veil of ambiguity it is enveloped in. The fi rst thing that must be done is to set a basis upon which all the respective hypothesis-theories on the subject under discussion can be fi xed; that is: meditation and its “relationship” with reality. Such basis could be become imbued on one of these two possibilities which for some immemorable time have given rise to discussions on the concept of free will; more precisely : determinism or indeterminism? My answer is therefore as follows: determinism (…nothing happens by chance, nothing at all). Having set such argument from the start, we can therefore go beyond this…

By adopting the concept of determinism, any “model” of “sub-jective will” that we may want to adopt in order to “explain” the act of meditation, would not make any sense (exactly, in a context of “strong objectivity”). The “main pathway” any individual walks upon, in the course of his earthly existence, is only one but with endless and potential diramation which themselves may completely lead to be “off course” and with diffi culty provide the way of going back to the “main pathway” or towards “parallel pathways” that in any case lead to a predefi ned destination. The fi nal destination is therefore always and exclusively one (and for each human being there is a different fi nal destination, precisely a determined “evolution-ary goal” which may only be refi ned with time, more precisely with other lives). Therefore, the reason why some people are more prone to respect compared to others and that are easily able to go into non ordinary states of consciousness (meditation) is an unknown matter


110

(as in the context of “powerful objectivity” talking about subjective will, conscious choices and free will make no sense). The only accep-tation in which we can understand the following assertion, namely: “Meditation alters reality”, is the following:

Freeing the mind by all “superfl uous information” surrounding us (meditation) therefore does not mean opening a passage towards other “main pathways” but simply eliminating all the “ramifi cations” leading us towards “dangerous” areas for our health-safety (and which are also non-educational) to fi x, through the phenomenon of retrocau-sality, a scheme of multiple (but not endless) “positive ramifi ctions”, (in keeping with our nature) through which we can comfortably “pass on” imagining all of its “benefi ts” thanks to retrocausality. Therefore, through meditation, we can fi x parametres at a subconscious level that will let us walk through endless “positive ramifi cations” for the rest of our lives, and we may be able to guess apriori their importance in rela-tion to the “meaning of our life” (obviously varying from individual to individual). Principally, (thoeretically), medication should therefore provoke in the subject taking it, a minor quantity of “confl icts of in-formation” (at a subconscious level) with respect to regress hypnosis and PNL (neurolinguistic programming).

Turnaturi: “Free Will does not exist, even if we believe the opposite. And this is due to the fact that the ego (fi ctitious entity) could not “think” differently. Our actual ego is our free will, in a way that it leads us to believe that we have free will. But from the moment that our ego is false, our free will also becomes false, because the same solely depends upon the existence of the ego. Concerning the reason why some people appear to be more prone to meditation than others, my “opinion” is that this depends on a mix of luck and evolutionary level of the subject. It is a bit like developing a determined illness: it depends on genetics (luck) and the subject’s behaviour (evolutionary level)”.

Rather interested are also her hypothesis-considerations on the correlation between meditation and retrocausality which undoubt-edly distance themselves in some ways from mine but anyhow offer some excellent points of refl exion:


111

“Through meditation ceases the phenomenon of retrocausality (and causality) which we have when we are unaware, whilst being medita-tive, means to be aware. When we are in a state of meditation there are no expectations, therefore the phenomenon of retrocausality does not take place and the positive event which follows it is not a transfor-mation from negative to positive but what it should have been in the fi rst place. In other words: having expectations (not being in a state of meditation) transforms reality in negative events, whilst not having expectations (when we are in a state of meditation)reality becomes what it is and cannot be defi ned as positive nor negative. Meditation is par excellence a condition defi nitely eliminating all confl icts because confl icts come from the mind but if we are in a state of meditation, the mind is not “present” so where are all the confl icts? Instead, PNL is a mental task just like any psychological therapy; psyche means mind and wherever the mind acts, there shall always be confl icts. Medita-tion eradicates problems from their roots and when we eradicate roots, weeds are no longer able to grow”.

Laplace once claimed:“An intelligence which, in a specifi c instance, knows all the powers

animating nature and the respective situation of all living beings com-posing it, even if it was deep enough to supply this data to an analysis, it would embrace within the same formula, the movement of the biggest bodies of the universe and the lightest atom: nothing would be uncertain and the future, just like the past, would exist in his eyes.”

Well, this theory has been proved wrong because everyone pre-ferred to base himself on the Principle of Indetermination of He-isenberg, ignoring the fact that the same originates and takes shape from human ignorance, defi ned by our own limits of observation. Generally, mankind prefers to believe in what he is only able to see…but if everything was visible, paradoxically, he would no longer be able to see anything because he would be blinded by the Being. De-terminism died since the birth of Heisenberg’s Principle of Indeter-mination and all scientists are careful not to dig it up again for the fear of losing credibility within the community they operate and possibly lose their jobs.


112

Determinism therefore, concealed in the heart of several scientists (…perhaps the best) will still continue to exist granting science the per-mission to never bother Heisenberg, Schrödinger, Bohr and all those who set the foundations of QED. (If Gödel had really been taken seri-ously, the whole subject of mathematics would have eventually ended on a dead track. Each science, in order to make progress, paradoxically requires a touch of Illogicality and Ignorance on our part.

Turnaturi: “When the mind is fi lled with too much knowledge, there is no room for the new. Knowledge is culture, which is obviously impor-tant but if knowledge is not accompanied by intuition which gives rise to “absence” of mind, it is therefore in the presence of ignorance and this only creates limitations. Of course, this may be a paradox, but life itself is a paradox and this fact can only be “understood” if we reason “with-out” the mind because the mind is unable to see paradoxes, consisting of reasoning and being logical. I believe that a scientist or a researcher must have a bit of ignorance before he can become a real scientist and a real researcher because only when everything that has been acquired in one’s mind is emptied can there be room for the Everything.

Your story about a door at the top of the stairs showed us how all positive expectations have transformed reality in an unfavourable event; I would like to add that when expectations are negative, reality takes shape around the subject in a way which is favourable. It is the classical example of when we are awaiting a phone call anxiously that never comes and instead arrives after we have lost all hope. Each time we have expectations, we modify our surrounding reality while when we do not have expectations (meditation) reality manifests itself (there-fore is not modifi ed) for what it is and cannot be claimed as positive or negative, rather neutral. It must however be said that in a way, it is almost as if it were positive, but only through a perceptive point of view because when we are in a state of meditation we feel a sense of well-being. Meditation, however is not a non-ordinary state of consciousness but it is the mind which provokes non-ordinary states and the moment that we do not know meditation we think that the same is not ordinary. What you call subconscious nucleuses are formed by mental activity (expectations) while when we are in a meditative state there is no forming of subconscious nucleuses. According to me, this is because in


113

meditation there are no thoughts (and therefore there are no expecta-tions). If meditation is the absence of thought, therefore an absence of expectations, subconscious nucleuses do not verify and therefore there are no phenomenas of casualty and retrocausality. Meditation is not something more, it is not an acquired structure; meditation is something less, a lost structure. Buddha stated that it is the mind creating the world and each of us creates his own world. Instead, meditation makes all personal worlds disappear and turns it into a reality which appears the same for everyone”.

After such hypothesis and considerations, it is clear that the care-ful reader will come up with the following question: but does the conscious state which we commonly defi ne as “meditative” (thus, the act of meditation), effectively places a “break” on the princi-ple of Retrocausality or not? Well, in order to answer this question with a minimum of objectivity and cause cognition, it is essential to remember the following: in 1942 Fantappiè (one of the greatest Italian mathematicians) demonstrated that the positive solution of energy (+E) is governed by the law of entropy, while the negative solution of energy (-E) is governed by a symmetric law of entropy that he calls sintropy. By studying the properties of sintropy Fantap-piè discovered with his great surprise, the coincidence between these properties and the typical characteristics of living beings, including order, organization, growth and tendency to complexity; he therefore came to assert that the typical properties of life are a consequence of causes collocated in the future. For any value of E (energy) that we would therefore want to consider within a psychic state which ex-cludes determined action-reaction stimuluses, the same could be null with diffi culty. We may even wish to consider the psyche intended as a complex form of dynamic information (which in the end is always energy but in a particular state between the ponderable and and imponderable) and exclude cerebral mass and all of its components (neurons, neutrotransmittors, neuropeptides) which play through ex-ternal stimulaes in favour of a constant “energetic oscillation”. As stated previously, even if we consider the psyche alone, if it is to be found in some sort of “condensed state” (meditation) where it is no longer possible to interact with external stimulaes of reality, the same


114

will have to assume “energetic values” due to “external stregths” be-ing surely endlessly small but never void; and this is for the simple fact that “an empty fi eld space” cannot exist.

“Only the idea of fi eld as representative of reality, combined with the general principle of Realativity manages to reveal the true inner

core of Descartes’ idea: that there is no existence of empty fi eld space.”

(A. EINSTEIN)

With these last clarifi cations-considerations I don’t intend to in-validate Turnaturi’s hypothesis (or validate them, obviously); rather I would like to help my most “curious” readers understand that things are not as simple as they may appear at fi rst glance. Having said this, it is clear that in such a complex fi eld where the borderline between physics and metaphysics becomes more and more subtle, any door leading to new frontiers still inexplored by scientifi c research remains open. Therefore, everything is possible, even if not experimentally demonstrable; let’s not forget the fact that several theories in phys-ics (and especially some postulates of Relativity) formulated in the beginning of the last centuries have been able to be experimentally demonstrated only in the last decades (it’s enough to think about the condensates of Bose-Einstein which were mentioned in the beginning of the book). What should also be considered is the fact that even in a mathematical ambit, which gives rise all ideas-hypothesis of the world of physics, include “truths” that still have not been demon-strated on the basis of which we continue to build theories of physics that still make little sense in some respects. Without bothering Gödel, for example, it is enough to think about the last theorem of De Fer-mat*20, which was only possible to be demonstrated (indirectly) after

*20 Such theorem states that for the following equation : xn + yn = zn , there are no solutions with integer numbers n above 2. By simply changing the 2 in Pitagora’s equation with any other number above, it becomes practically impossible to fi nd a solution with integer numbers. The demonstration of such theorem was found not too many years ago by mathematician Andrew Wiles.


115

three hundred years further to its formulation! There are therefore ideas following brief paths before they can be demonstrated; others take longer and this obviously depends on the complexity that such ideas reveal through time and the importance they envelop in the practical applications they should in the end include, in order to improve the quality of determined functional aspects of old and new technologies (which in turn are linked to the quality of our lives). Therefore, measures developed within my theories of the Synchro Energy Project which now appear to be an absolutely arduous task, if not rather impossible may in future fi nd applications in determined scientifi c-technological ambits. My hopes (…even if it were wrong to have any hopes because as we know, they only lead towards disap-pointments and displeasing events), currently could be summarized with the following simple consideration: now that the die has been drawn, someone sooner or later may follow the same pathway, pos-sibly reaching new goals, perhaps even more signifi cant from the ones that I have been able to reach through the exploitation of my modest culture and intelligence.



PART II – God=mc2

(Chosen readings from the original italian version: Dio=mc2)

intilla_syncro_stampa.indd Sec2:117intilla_syncro_stampa.indd Sec2:117 20-11-2007 18:02:2020-11-2007 18:02:20


119

Between Good and Bad

“I will only believe what I am convinced in because I am convinced, without trusting the words of others”.

RENÉ DESCARTES

“Everything leads us to believe that there exists a certain point in the spirit at which life and death, the real and the imaginary, the past

and the future, the communicable and the incommunicable, the high and the low, cease to be percieved as contradictory. “.

ANDRÉ BRETON

I can still clearly recall the memory of a bright and breezy spring morning when, walking to my elementary school with a school friend (I think it was around the beginning of the 80s, perhaps on the fi fth year of elementary school). Along the walk which divided our care-free family life from the more rigid and boring school life, in an instant of illumination which I could now defi ne as the product of a brief and unconscious meditative state (perhaps stimulated by my progressive mental detachment from impulses supplied by a “condi-tional reality” of the changeable world surrounding me) I had the most aberrant intuition that a young boy could ever have in those fl eeting years in life.

With complete natural truthfulness, I turned towards my young friend and asked him the following questions:

“Patrick, why I am myself and not someone else? Why was I born in 1972 in Bellinzona, Switzerland and not, for example in 1927 in New Dehli, India or in another part of the world?” And again…”Why do I belong to this animal species? Why was I born on this planet and not on


120

another perhaps on another solar system or perhaps in another galaxy, millions of light years from Earth?”

I still remember his reaction.He slowly turned his head towards me and when he looked at me,

I had the impression that his gloomy pupils where trying to scrutinize through what was allowed, trying to discover what was concealed in the twists and turns of my psyche.

With a slight and circumstantial stutter and a pale face (this actu-ally being his nature) after having refl ected for an instant, he replied that he “actually didn’t have a clue” and that after all, having answers to such questions would not have changed our lives in any way.

Logically, up to now, I still have not been able to answer all such questions that I have been carrying with me for over twenty years, and it is a foregone conclusion that I will never be able to fulfi ll such endless demanding task. However, in the immense psychic effort that I have tried for several years, in the attempt to try to fi nd a more or less “subjectively acceptable” answer to all these impossible questions, in a distinctive fraction of a second, when my thoughts touched the limit that is granted to any other human being (limit which is only granted to mathematics, because everything becomes endlessly irra-tional; it could be actually be claimed that mathematics is the “Voice of God”), I had that wonderful but also puzzling intuition (perhaps that of the Aleph, as it would have been defi ned by Jorge Luis Borges; or perhaps that of the Omega point, as it would instead have been defi ned by father Teilhard de Chardin) who brought me to formulate the following consideration: “To be and not to be, existence and non-existence are nothing but two sides of the same coin”.

Existence and Non Existence, could be imagined as two tangent and parallel lines extending for an endless distance, and at the end actually rejoin their starting point forming a geometrically perfect circle of infi nite dimensions. If we fi nally want to widen such con-cept by redifi ning it, no longer on an euclidean front, but in a space defi ned by Gaussian coordinates (therefore also taking in the “mul-tidimensionality” of space-time), we could rejoin the same to that Nietzschean phylosophical feature which poses the concept of Ex-istence (in universal terms), in the ambit of the Eternal Spiral where


121

everything is repeated: where in this case the perfect circle represents one of the endless “rings” constituting the Eternal Spiral.

Such instinctive behaviour in each animal species defi ned as “love for (or towards) life”, therefore originates from thought (belonging to still young animal species) far from the possibility of accessing the kind of thought which is much more evolved and which moulded by millions and millions of extreme intuitions, becomes pure awareness of an Absolute Reality.

It would not be diffi cult for a civilization where such degree of awareness can easily be reached, to imagine a high rate of suicides and an extremely low birthrate.

But at what point can suicide (obviously the one infl icted by an individual who has no psychological disorder or illness) represent something which is insane or innatural for a human being?

Whatever we can conceive and classify below the parameter of: “Good”, falls within a picture of a refl ection conditioned by our own nature. On the contrary, everything conceived and classifi ed under the parameter of: “Bad”, falls within the picture of a distorted refl ex, in this case, conditioned by an unusual and original kind of nature, which obviously no longer falls within the norms of the ordinary nature that we were so fond of. If we now go and analyze these two parameters: Good and Bad, on a much higher conceptual level, com-pletely detached by the ordinary and conditioning nature defi ned by the genetic code of any human being belonging to the animal kingdom, a nature which does not allow us to conceive others outside the same, we realize that these two conceptual parameters: Good and Bad, have no absolute value; they are nothing but a refl ex, which is sometimes original but most of the ordinary, of our nature.

Coming down to a lower conceptual level thus by only basing ourselves on the ordinary nature of each biological entity (of the animal kingdom) of the earth, using Oscar Wilde’s words, we could surely claim that: “Everything that is understood is good”.6


122

The Wondering Soul

“All I know and all that I have learned leads me to believe that the world in our present conscious is only one of the many existing

worlds of consciouses and that such worlds must contain valid experiences even for our life; and in spite of the fact that those experiences and the ones of our world remain separate, there is

between the two connecting points an energy which fi lter from one to the other turning it into an unicum”.

WILLIAM JAMES

I would now like to move on and analyze a concept so dear to theologians and millions believers from every religion; the concept of the “soul”.

According to theologians, each human being, differently from other animal species, has a soul; according to them, it is comparable to some kind of unobservable “energy”, which cannot be quantifi ed or distinguished, which each and every human being possesses dur-ing his or her earthly life, and that is undying, even after death.

The same, is therefore considered, according to theologians, as some kind of energy pervading our body (some however, believe that the same is only concentrated in the brain) and the moment in which we die (that is when our electroencephalology appears fl at and there is therefore no neural activity) is able to dissassociate itself from the body and continue to exist eternally in a world which represents the dark side of the coin: the one of Non Existence.

Such kind of energy is also considered, according to Christian and several other religions, the same granting a life to be manifested or in


123

other words: it is Life in itself. Each human being therefore, is con-sidered as some kind of machine whose fuel is named as the “soul”; without which (the machine) would not be able to move, interact with its surrounding environment and therefore, in simpler words, it would not be able to live.

When we reach the concept of the soul, the mechanistic vision of life (in this case referring to an individual human being), is met in almost all religions (as it wanted to bear witness that mankind, from the beginning of time out of mind, has never wanted to accept the idea of having to eventually deal with death and disappear defi nitely in the emptyness); however, some of religions, such as Buddhism, Zen, Taoism and generally all Eastern religions, appear to diverge from the mechanistic vision of life, the World and the entire Universe in the most absolute manner.

All of these religions or life phylosophies in fact, don’t follow the classic and currently natural schemes of human thought as this ac-tually fi nds itself trapped and involved in a continuous fi ght with the usual binary structures (typical of any still young animal spe-cies); but such contrast with the normal model of human thought, is uniquely met on a level in which global aspects of the entire existence are considered.

Theology, therefore admits the existence of two forms of souls: one (which is the one letting us live, as it is life itself accompanying us until death), merged in the most absolute dissociable way with the body and mind; the other “extracorporeal” one, more precisely the one which at the moment of death becomes dissociated from our bodies and continues to exist eternally in an extraphysical world.

Let’s now analyse the concept of earthly soul, associated with the body of each human being throughout their entire life, and we will connect it with what is commonly deducted in the scientifi c world with regards to life in itself. It would be almost incredible, but in this case, science offers us a vision that is absolutely systemic of the life of each human being. (Everything is correlated to everything) we will therefore analyse the following medical assumption:

“The moment an animal human being no longer presents any activ-ity at a neural level and therefore his electrocardiogram appears to be fl at, he can be defi ned as clinically dead”.


124

Therefore, in scientifi c terms, the soul, can be defi ned as some kind of psychic energy produced by the activities of the neurotransmittors within the brain [a way in which a determined quantity of mechani-cal work transformes (produces) a determined quantity of calories; therefore a determined quantity of celebral or neural work, trans-forms (produces) a determined quantity of psychic energy]. “Nothing is created and nothing is destroyed, everything transforms itself”.

Therefore, the same can exist (the soul or if you prefer, a psychic energy), only and exclusively during its neural activity; the moment the same ceases, any kind psychic energy (the fruit of a neural activity and unconceivable as an indipendent and self-organizing entity, as everything is correlated to everything) would immediately dissipate in its surrounding environment; that is, it would immediately transform itself, interact and become part of its surrounding environment.

It has now been several centuries that mankind has been trying to provide an explanation of the concept of soul abusing scientifi c terms, and in particular the extracorporeal one. Often, when try at all costs to provide an explanation for such a delicate concept which for several thousands of years has been dear to each human being, the unforgivable mistake is made, more precisely to use scientifi c terms to explain something that has nothing to do with the physical reality in which we live; a reality where it is absolutely not possible to observe what belongs to the obscure side of the coin: the one of Non Existence.

Something which we often hear or read about concerning the human soul, is that it is some kind of undying psychic energy, or an energetic and self-organizing sphere…energy, energy, energy…

Generally, those who support the idea of energetic soul, talk about it as if it was something ethereal, unobservable by our physical reality paradoxically in strict correlation with it; by making use (but perhaps we ought to say abuse) of the term “energy”, each time they attempt to defi ne this eternal survival after life.

Admitting the existence of some kind of energy which is not es-sentially the fruit of the transformation of another form of energy, would therefore be like admitting that in nature, scattered here and


125

there in space, there could be some form of sparse caloric energy spheres, that are self-organizing and undying; this would go against all the laws and principles of thermodynamics, which are arguments accepted until a contradictory experimentation is verifi ed. For exam-ple, the most modern form of the Principle of Theormodynamics is the following:”It is extremely unlikely (but not impossible) that heat spontaneously passes from a colder body to a warmer one”.

In fact, even psychic energy could be defi ned as the transformation of some part of each neurotrasmittor, into another kind of energy; if it is true that E=mc2, each neurotransmittor represents nothing but another complex form of energy.

Even mankind substantially represents a complex form of energy (able to organize itself yet not undying); by calculating that in 1 kg of mass there is something like twenty fi ve billions of kWh of en-ergy “encapsulated”*1*1 so I will therefore let you calculate how much energy a 70kg man represents. Finally, going back to the concept of soul, we must conclude that the same may not be defi ned in physical or even scientifi c terms. If we want to consider that man truly has a soul dissociating itself from his body after death (therefore accepting what William Blake stated approximately two hundred years ago that “Everything that can be conceived, is an image of reality”), the same will never be able to reveal itself to the physical reality in which we live; and it will never be able to be observed or detected with physical instruments. Someone may now remember what I previously stated about the concept of Existence and Non Existence, more precisely that both are nothing but two sides of the same coin (comprising a physical and extraphysical reality); thus you may ask yourselves: “But if the soul belongs to the dark side of the coin, the one of Non Existence, and if it is true that Existence and Non Existence could be conceived as two parallel tangent lines (of an infi nite length), why couldn’t Existence and Non Existence interact amongst themselves?”

Well, I believe that in each instant of our lives, we interact with everything belonging to the world of Inexistence; and that everything

*1 Considering the balance between mass-energy, it would not really be right to talk about energy encapsulated in a mass, since mass and energy fundamentally represent a single concept, defi ned with two different words.


126

we “achieve” in our life is nothing but the fruit of the interaction subsisting between Existence and Non Existence.

All of our actions, the movement in itself of an entire life of each human being, is comparable to that of an elementary particle ; the same can in fact exist simply as the fruit of interactions and interdependences between other sub-atomic particles. Each interac-tion between Existence and Non Existence, is therefore manifested simultaneously on two different fundamental levels: the physical (real) and the extra-physical.

Here is therefore the solution to the enigma of the wave-particle dualism and how it can transfer from an atomic orbital 1s to an orbital 2s, disappearing from a point in space and then reappearing into another: this is how we can conceive differently the fact that a single electron could contemporaneously move through two holes of a metallic plate; this is how we are able to conceive differently … Schrodinger’s “living-dead cat” and so on.


127

Beyond evolution

“It is much more important that an assertion be interesting rather than true”

ALFRED NORTH WHITEHEAD

The space object which had the brightness and colour of moulded gold, decelerated briskly moving through the speed of light to a state of absolute stillness. It was shaped in a bizarre way, of a shape symi-lar to the human eye, the alien object appeared to be constituted by two geometrical solid shapes with superimposed pyramidal-shaped bases.

Still in its mesopause*2, above immense mother of pearl colour clouds, at approximately eighty kilometres distance by the earthly ground and brightened by the sun rays, the perfect spatial machine changed its geometrical appearance as if it was constituted by some kind of plastic material into a spheric shape. It provided an inef-fable gift to only few elect beings of the blue planet and after a few instances, it became invisible in the most absolute way, disappearing in time-space in a fraction of a second. However, from the invisible sphere, eyes and non-human minds were beginning to give rise to careful refl exions.

“Look Alem! This is the water planet. It is populated by several

*2 Atmospheric layer situated at approximately 80-90 km distance of the earth surface, whose temperature oscillates between 70 and 80 degrees Celsius. Apart from this atmospheric layer, the temperature increases exceedingly until it re-aches a value of approximately 2’200°C at around 400 km distance from the earth surface.


128

animal species, but the most predominant is the human species” said the small creature with the conic head and disproportionate almond-shaped eyes to his travelling companion.

“It really is an enchanting planet” observed Alem with an en-tranced look. “But tell me Aleph, this kind of animal species you are talking about, has it already reached the third evolutionary phase?” asked once again the small creature which looked similar to Aleph’s in its physical appearance.

Aleph opened his small triangular-shaped mouth and smiled showing the long and compact bony tissue that constituted his tooth-ing:

“No, the human species must still get over the fi rst. Human beings evolve rather slowly: this is, I believe, due to the conformation of their brain. You see, the human brain doesn’t have a conical shape such as ours. Their brain is similar to the “most evolved” animal species of the Godar planet in the 248 Ross System”.

“Are you talking about the Meracis?” asked Alem.

“Yes, indeed. However, they have already moved on to the second evolving age. In the past, the Meracis were the predominant species of the Godar planet which had about ten billion inhabitants, but now there are only two billion remaining. Still now, they are trying to make up for the mistakes that were made during their fi rst evolving phase”.

Alem remained rapt for a few instances and then, with an ever in-creasing interest towards the subject which had been put on hold, he started to talk to Aleph once again: “Do you believe that the Meracis will save themselves from a premature extinction?”

“Yes, I believe so, even if they are only at the dawning of the sec-ond evolutionary phase and in spite of the fact that unfortunately, only few remain”.

“Will they reach the third evolutionary phase? “ continued Alem.

Aleph smiled once again and said: “No... it is unconceivable, the


129

structure of their brain does not grant such evolutionary advancement. And humans will obviously never be able to reach the third evolution-ary phase”.

“Therefore, both humans and the Meracis are exposed to a prema-ture extinction due to the cosmic factor, or am I wrong?” continued Alem, eager to know.

“Alem! What are you saying? Each animal species belonging to the Universe, before it can reach the third evolutionary phase is subject to a possible premature extinction. Even our animal species has risked extinction due to the cosmic factor.

The fi rst evolutionary phase is a critical phase; but even the sec-ond evoluationary phase is critical because other than the risk of a premature extinction due to mistakes made by the species in the fi rst evolutionary phase, there is a risk of premature extinction due to a cosmic factor”.

“But our species didn’t make many mistakes during the fi rst evolu-tionary phase” shrewdly observed Alem.

“Yes, it’s true. We have quickly evolved and made few mistakes in the fi rst evolutionary phase thanks to the conic shape of our brain. If we had had a brain similar to human beings or the Meracis, we would have never reached the third evolutionary phase and we would have been extinct below the perpetual ice which for several detlan has been covering our planet of origin”.

Aleph, from the height of his knowledge, answered patiently to each question which Alem was asking him, without varying his mild and eloquent tone of voice.

Alem observed the Earth remaining in cogitation, pointing his big almond shaped eyes to a vast and isolated land which had emerged, called Australia; then, moved by a shadow of a doubt,began talking about the subject once again:

“Therefore, if we exclude the cosmic factor, human beings and the Meracis could avoid a premature exctinction but would perpetually stay in the second evolutionary phase”.


130

“Exactly” confermed Aleph. “If we exclude the cosmic factor they could survive for another three or four deifron before they actually go into exctinction”.

“Will we be extinct too?”

“Most probably yes. According to primitive science, a science which dates back to our fi rst evolutionary species each animal species of this Universe is destined to become extinct sooner or later”.

“Do you believe that there could be a fourth evolutionary phase?” asked Alem, almost excited.

Aleph remained quiet and hesitant for a few instances, as if the question asked in such a naive way, had subconsciously disturbed him, but then, he replied: “I have been told that there are some living beings which travel in separable capsules and that are able to move them around space by exploiting the cerebralelectrogravitationalmag-netic power. Such beings could have reached the fourth evolutionary phase”.

“What about us, will we ever be able to reach such evolutionary phase?”

“Well, our scientists have only lately discovered endless appli-cations applied to the psycoelectrogravitationalmagnetism. And we must also remember that only a few nano-detlan have passed since our great discovery of temporal energy. In the past, we believed that the antimatter and time were two distinct items, nowadays we know that a vast concentration of temporal energy, gives origin to antimat-ter particles.

The human species, are already roughly aware of temporal energy; in fact, human beings (thanks to Setinein*3’s thought, a great scientist belonging to their fi rst evolutionary phase) have already distinguished

*3 Einstein’s anagram.


131

space-time in two sectors which they themselves defi ne as: high gravita-tional potential and at a low gravitational potential. When human be-ings will realize that in places far from Earth, in regions rather distant from the Earth, the average number of antimatter particles present in space is rather low compared to antimatter particles originating from the Earth itself, and will probably come to the conclusion that time and antimatter are nothing but different kinds of the same energy. Therefore, you should be able to perceive that evolution can hold many surprises for us.

In this universe, nothing should be taken for granted. A great phy-losopher who came from the fi rst evolutionary phase who, if I am not mistaken, was called Storialete*4 said: The one who tries to educate himself must fi rst of all be able to doubt, because intellectual doubt leads us to discover the truth”.

Alem, naively asked his fellow: “But isn’t it rather incoherent the fact that you mention primitive phylosophical concepts in order to in-troduce them as educational purposes in the reality of our times? Aleph at that point got angry: “You are stupid! Nothing makes minds so imprudent and useless such as ignorance of past times and disregard for ancient work”; and I believe that Jertoub*5 was actually right”.

Alem remained quiet for a long time, meditating on the extremely important subject he had learned by Aleph’s phylosophical talk and then, without anger, he peacefully turned towards him:

“You just said that in this universe we should never take anything for granted and that we should doubt anything; now, on the basis of your claims, I would like to ask you: What is the reason which leads you to believe with certainty that human beings and the Meracis will never reach the third evolutionary phase?”.

Aleph, after Aleph’s sharp and careful refl exion in connection to what he had previously stated, was dazed and perhaps surprized by such a simple yet embarassing question.

“Actually, distinguished scientists coming from our contemporary era have affi rmed that ...” For a small moment in time, Aleph went

*4 Aristotele’s anagram.*5 Joubert’s anagram.


132

quiet, feeling as if he was making a great mistake, a mistake which would inevitably have destroyed the complex phylosophical puzzle that had been reigning in his mind for some time, then he said:

“Do you know something Alem? This is the classic example in which the student surpasses his teacher. Let me congratulate you Alem, sometimes you prove to have a rather uncostumary discern-ment”.

Alem smiled, pleased with himself and asked: “I have never understood something about you Aleph, which is:

for what reason a lover of all sciences such as yourself, in spite of the immense store of scientifi c and phylosophical knowledge you have at your disposal, expresses himself in such a simple and hardly researched manner in order to build and defi ne concepts that are at times rather profound and of a great phylosophical value”.

Aleph, slightly opened his wide hazel eyes and with a calm voice said:: “I knew that sooner or later you would have asked me this ques-tion. Alem, you should know that the most profound thoughts and teachings closer to the truth actually derive from the most simple words and discussions. Storialete said:

“Words are beneath the wisdom that they should inspire”. The simpler the words and discussions and the less obstacles thoughts will encounter in its endless ascent towards the truth.

Alem, in a doubt, asked: “But if you say that the ascent of thought towards truth is endless, this therefore means that you suppose that absolute truth is unreachable?”

“I am very pleased with you Alem, and do you know why? Simply because you were able to connect what was said a while ago regarding doubts of the intellect, with your nth question. You said: This means that you assume... you didn’t say… this means that you consider… the fact that you used the verb suppose is rather signifi cant because from this we can deduct that you have grasped Storialete’s teachings regard-ing doubts of the intellect perfectly and subconsciously, because this is what I believe happened, you made use of this in your latest question.

Alem was left speechless when faced with Aleph’s observations


133

because rightly, he had believed that he had truly made use of the teaching of doubts on the intellect in a subconscious way.

It hadn’t been a pre-elaborated reasoning to suggest him, in his last question to make use of the verb assume, rather his subcon-scious.

This meant that the teaching of doubts on the intellect, had be-nevolently placed its roots in his opened mind. Aleph, without being asked anything by Alem, replied to the question which had been put aside and continued to express his ideas regarding the relationship between simplicity-thought:

“I haven’t answered your question yet Alem; you were asking me whether I assumed that absolute truth is unreachable, weren’t you?” Alem nodded.

“Well, yes, I believe that absolute truth is actually unreachable. The steps leading to knowledge are endless Alem; and absolute truth is ac-tually placed at the end of this endless ladder. But now, I would like to go back to the relationship subsisting between a simplicity understood as characteristic defi ned by very few elements and the use of matter. In order to reach the highest and most sought-after levels of technol-ogy, it essential to carry out an in-depth and uninterrupted research on schemes and technological models which seemingly appear to be perfect and not alterable but that in reality belong to a low level of technologi-cal evolution. Increasing the density of schemes and models, not alter-able technology and science gain an ever increasing value. Here is an example: can you see that triangular button which is found in the centre of the control panel?” said the man pointing to it, “that button can carry out eight functions, that is as many as the fi ngers in our hands; because depending on the fi nger that presses it, the same will be able to activate the electro-magnetic transformers, weigh the capsule in a pre-established direction or make the capsule speed in space increase…can you understand what I am trying to express? In order to reach a high technological level, it is not necessary to continually increase the number of elements present in schemes and models and associate each of them to a single function, rather it is essential to reduce the number of elements and multiply its functions as much as possible”.

Alem scratched the top of his cranial cone and remained ab-sorbed in his thoughts for a long time, trying to restore order in that


134

multitude of teachings that had been assimilated in an extremely short period of time, amalgamating ideas and concepts in the most bizzarre and varied ways in a manner that no human mind could conceive.

After such a long psychic task, once again he turned to Aleph: “Once I read something by a phylo-scientist*6 from ancient times, I believe he was called ... Ramul, or Ramel...”.

“Ramond, was he called Luap Ramond*7 the phylo-scientist you are talking about” promptly specifi ed Aleph, “some time ago I also read some of his works; please carry on Alem” he fi nally asked him .

“In one of his works he said something about intelligence: intel-ligence is one, through different structures, just like the desire to live sheltered is one, through one thousand architectural works.

What do you think Aleph, could it be really this way?”.

“Well, I believe that Ramond was right, but I only agree with part of his statements. In my opinion, it is thought, the singular entity able to move freely through several cerebral structures.

Intelligence is the daughter of thought, the same could not exist without a thought generatinv it; and the quality of intelligence and its grade of nobility depends on the way and speed in which thought travels through the various cerebral structures. Human beings’ thoughts like those of the Meracis, prevalently travel through binary structures. They do not have a binary-analogue-deductive thought such as ours and it is therefore for this reason that human beings and the Meracis are not able to broadly predict the future. Even our species originally didn’t have an analogue-deductive thought; but later, with evolution and above all thanks to the conic conformation of our brain, by entering the third evolutionary phase, our thought was able to undertake all essential transformations which now grant us the ability to reason in a binary-analogue manner and are therefore able to broadly predict the future.

*6 Term made up of two words: phylosopher and scientist.*7 Paul Morand’s anagram.


135

It is however true that between human beings, there are those nor-mally named as mystics, sorcerers or clarvoyants who are able, even if not endowed with a conic-shaped brain, to reach a third psychic state; that is the awakening state*8, the one in which it is possible to use the boundless powers of the superconsciousness. At what state such indi-viduals reach the awakening state, our phyloscientists still have not been able to fi nd out; but it is a known fact that some are actually able to telepathically communicate with us, obviously in a rather primitive manner, and as they do not know the signals and codes of the telepathic they are not able to transmit a message which makes sense. It is prob-ably true that humans, in the next ten or fi fteen detlan, that is when they will be endowed with a more voluminous brain than the one they have now, they shall be able to take advantage of certain powers of superconsciousness which until now, only certain elect of their species unexplainably know and are able to make use of “.

At that point Alem, telepathically asked Aleph a question: “What makes you think that human beings, in ten or fi fteen detlan, in spite of the fact that they may be endowed with a more voluminous brain and therefore have a more elevated intellectual potential, will not anyhow be able to make use of all the powers of superconsciousness?”.

Aleph made an undistinguished grimace and after having sighed, he replied to Alem verbally: “You see, unfortunately, human beings’ greatest problem is that nature has not endowed them with a conic-shaped brain. Human beings as well as Meracis, because of this freak of nature, are only able to make use of a measly 10% of their great intellectual potential. Now, in order to make use of all the powers of superconsciousness, it is essential that the individual make use of 100% of his intellectual potential. In ten or fi fteen detlan, human beings will have a maximum of 70% of their intellectual potential, because their brain unfortunately does not have a conic shape. Do you understand now why I am of the opinion that human beings will never be able to

*8 In order to fully understand the meaning of state of awakening and that of superconsciousness, the last chapters (III part, cap.V, VI, VII, VIII) of the book: “Il mattino dei maghi”, by Pauwels and Bergier (Ed.Mondadori, Milano) must be read.


136

make use of all the power of superconsciousness and that as a conse-quence, it will be rather improbable that they will be able introduce themselves to the third evolutionary phase?”.

Alem lightly agreed and fell into a state of meditation. Aleph, in each of his reply, seemed that he constantly followed

a logical scheme which was densely ramifi ed and with diffi culty re-futable; it was a scheme which uniquely induced refl exion and only rarely led to questioning the most delicate points, thus leaving Alem in an unconscious state of continuous frustration. But in spite of this inevitable situation, caused by the deep differences in himself and Aleph’s intellectual maturity (above all linked to experience), that Alem rarely allowed his intellect to fall into a passive mode; far from this, even if most of the times, implicitly in front of Aleph, he imposed his intellect to doubt each thing, even items which accord-ing to him appeared to be irrefutable and evident. His was a strong mind and he was fully aware of it; he knew that sooner or later, even if he had had Aleph’s similar fund of experience and knowledge, he would have become a great lover of all sciences just like his fellow traveller.

Suddenly, his thought slipped against the fl ow, going back to re-examine everything which Aleph had initially expressed regarding the evolution of the human species and what he had within limits defi ned... errors.

He turned to Aleph and made use of his tongue: “You know Aleph, after a careful refl exion about what you initially displayed con-cerning the model of human evolution, I have realized that there is still something which places my intellect in a state of deep perplexity: it is something which in the beginning, I thought I had understood perfectly, but now it unfortunately breaches my thoughts and brings a lot of un-certainty. It concerns the concept of error, Aleph; what do you exactly mean when you talk about errors made by mankind during the fi rst evolutionary phase?” he questioned with an unquiet soul.

“Well Alem, I would really like to talk about mankind’s errors with you but unfortunately, the author of this program has just com-


137

municated telepathically that he would rather do this in another mul-timedial reality”.

“What are you saying Aleph? What program are you talking about?... and who has telepathically communicated to you? “asked Alem opening his eyes wide and with an dumbfounded look.

“The author of the program Alem, is he who communicated tel-epathically with me” replied Aleph in all tranquility and with a slight smile.

“We do not belong to the physical reality, we are imaginary be-ings, created by human beings’ fantasy who are currently generating all our thoughts through circuits printed on his computer. In reality, our thoughts belong to the one who generated us, the author of the program; all our refl exions are nothing but the fruit of the psychic work of this primitive animal who, transported by his imagination in the multimedia reality we live in”.

After such words Alem was astonounded in a rather worrying manner, impatiently trying to fi nd a way out from that enormous psychic chaos that had formed from the inside of his conic head.

“I am going crazy Aleph. Do you therefore want me to believe that in reality we do not exist? That we belong to the fantasy of a rough and primitive human being and that we could therefore disappear into the void at any time without prior notice?”

“Well, theoretically yes, but this would only happen if the one who generated us deleted the entire program contained within the computer fi le in which we exist. I strongly doubt that the human being under question will lead to committing such a mean action towards ourselves but anyhow, if my opinions are not enough to make you feel better, you can always ask him directly and fi nd out what his intentions are “.

“Do you mean that... I am also able to dialogue with that being, the human being of the program?”.


138

“Yes, you can Alem. We belong to him, to his thought, we are not able to hide anything from him. The reality in which we live has been generated by him through his fantasy; our thoughts in reality belong to him…I know that this is extremely diffi cult to understand and accept, but unfortunately this is reality. Come on Alem, you can ask him anything you want”.

“Well...I...”

“Come on! In this moment in time, he is here with us, ask him something, you can even do it telepathically!”.

Alem looked around with a troubled expression and verbally formulated the following question: “I...just wanted to ask you, what are... or what will be your intentions towards us, I mean…you will let us live, won’t you?”

Aleph couldn’t but smile and covered his mouth with his palmed hand.

“DO NOT WORRY, I HAVE NO INTENTION OF MAKING YOU DISAPPEAR”.

Alem swalled slowly clearing the lump in his throat.

“BUT YOU MUST PROMISE ME NEVER TO CALL ME ROUGH OR PRIMITIVE, OK? “

“Yes, yes…of course, I promise. Can I do anything else for you?” he asked with a beating heart.

“NO, I ACTUALLY BELIEVE THAT IT’S ALL FOR NOW. RELAX ALEM, YOU DON’T WANT TO DIE OF A CARDIAC ARREST NOW THAT I HAVE GIVEN YOU A GOOD PIECE OF NEWS, DO YOU?”.

Alem’s face turned bright red and Aleph’s smile turned into laughter.


139

“He spoke to me telepathically Aleph! “he said excitedly. “He said that…but, what are you laughing at?”.

“I know, I know Alem…I heard everything” he stopped laughing and became serious again. “Well, now you no longer have a reason to worry about your …safety. Smile Alem, the multimedia reality is not that bad…”.

The two grey beings stayed quiet for a long time, until Alem inter-rupted him: “Aleph, what do you think about going on this enchanted planet and meet some human being?”.

“Are you crazy? They are primitive beings, if we go amongst them we will only freighten them. Furthermore, we don’t know how they could react. It appears that you have forgotten the fi rst rule of ethology*9 Alem”.

“Which is?”

“Do not disturb animals that are being observed. Not long ago, one of our capsules that penetrated the atmosphere of this planet had a fault on one of its anti-gravitational amplifi ers and precipitated on a solid point of the planet. In spite of the strong impact on the planet surface, the pilots managed to save their lives. Their capsule was semi-destroyed but they were able to signal their position to other capsules who luckily were within the Alpha 21 solar system.

Well, when the two capsules entered the orbit of this planet in order to look for the pilots which needed to be rescued, the emergency signal-ler suddenly stopped emitting glairion waves, thus preventing the two rescuing capsules to identify the point where the two pilots were to be found. For a long time, the two rescuing capsules and others searched the entire solid area of the planet, but the pilots and their capsules were never found”.

*9 Biological discipline which studies the habits and customs of animals and the adaptation of plants in the environment


140

“Do you think it was mankind’s doing?”

“Yes, many believe so, including myself. According to me, the pi-lots of that capsule are still alive; those primitives have probably been studying for some time our aerospatial technology. Who knows what they are trying to discover. Perhaps formulas and the secrets of electro-gravitomagnetic energy, or perhaps the laws of black fi elds, fi elds which are able create spatio-time contractions. They are such dreamers!”

“Remember Aleph, you must never take anything for granted in this Second Universe” jokingly cautioned him Alem.

“It’s true, perhaps some human beings know far much more than we do and probably…more than what several human beings believe”.


141

Errando discitur

“Sometimes the truth makes its entrance in history, riding upon the saddle of error”.

REINHOLD NIEBUHR.

“One who never made a mistake never made a discovery”.SAMUEL SMILES

When I talk about the following, what do I actually refer to?:

Errors in the human species during the fi rst evolutionary phase?

First of all, it must be said that such errors are principally con-nected to the scientifi c-technological as well as the political-econom-ical sphere which takes shape and develops around the latest men-tioned. Because the topic under discussion is extremely complex and extent, in order to help anyone’s mind (independently from his/her own cultural level or scientifi c knowledge) “chain refl exions” may be triggered off, it is essential to cut it down to a simple example: let’s imagine that mankind, in the course of its own evolution, invented (or made, or created or discovered) as many as one hundred “things”. (You may freely go through a wide range of knowledge within any fi eld of science, as well as the political or economical one). Out of seventy of these “things” man only knows the positive sides of them but not the negative ones which they could conceal. This is not a


142

serious factor because no negative sides to these seventy “things” exist.*10

Out of twenty of such “things” mankind knows the positive sides, but does not know the negative sides or long-term damage that these could cause on a long term (within a few hundred years) to the earth’s environment and the behaviour of the human species [directly, or indirectly (through the feeding and other organic substances volun-tarily or involuntarily fed into our biologic cycle, such as vaccines, medicines, drugs...)] and/or to other animal species.

Having created these twenty things (or discovered, invented or made…) means having committed involuntary (or secondary) mis-takes.

Out of ten of these “things” man may know the positive sides and also knows the negative side or long-term damage that these can cause to the earth’s environment and/or to the behaviour of the hu-man species (directly or indirectly) and/or to other animal species.

Having created these ten “things”, means having commited vol-untary (or principle) mistakes.

At this point, one could ask himself: why did man want to create (or made, build…) these ten “things” in spite of the fact that he was fully aware of all the negative points of which they were saturated?

He could have limited himself to developing those “things” at a theoretical level, studying them as if it had been possible to create

*10 This may not be the exact truth because each entity of this Universe, whether organic or non-organic, will never be able to be in absolute harmony with its surrounding environment. For each entity there are always two sides of the coin, positive-negative, the fact is that most of the times, these entities present a nega-tive side to the coin which is so small and cannot be observed by the human spe-cies so we are therefore used to defi ne them as “pefect entities” or entities which are in perfect harmony with their surrounding environment. Generally, these negative points which are not observable by the human species acquire larger dimensions and as a consequence become more or less observable by our species only after several thousands or even tens of thousands of years. (Unfortunately, all is always awfully relative! Everything is correlated to everything and there is nothing in this world that can be conceived as a singular and independent entity if we move our thoughts through a general conceptualization of the Universe).

Nevertheless, in order to simplify the conceptual theme of the hundred “things”, it is essential to omit the existence of such negative aspects (which are in such context extremely indecisive factors).


143

them with other scientifi c criteria or abandon them whilst looking for other scientifi c pathways. For what reason did he still wish to create them? An answer to this great enigma could be the following: there are scientists which spend all their lives in order to come to a “great” (or it would perhaps be better to say revolutionary) scientifi c discovery and when they reach such aim, the wish to announce to humanity their “discovery” is so great, that even if the same was saturated with negative sides or aspects, they would only be able to distinguish the positive ones (even if limited); but we cannot blame them for this. Their brain isn’t conic-shaped, as many people think; they are common human beings and their soul is susceptible, fi lled with joy, pain, pride, greed and presumption (especially when apart from fame, money is involved). Would you like to smile?

Well, it isn’t so diffi cult to think that thanks to these ten “things”, mankind risks to be ... prematurely extinguished.

“The energy produced by the breaking down of the atom is a very poor kind of thing... Anyone who expects a source of power from the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine... We hope in the next few years to get an idea of what these atoms are, how they are made and the way they are worked”.

(twelve years later, the inhabitants of Nagasaki and Hiroshima discovered at their expense what the atom was capable of. N.d.A.).

This is a fragment of an article which appeared on a British news-

paper on the 12th of September 1933, in which Ernest Rutherford expressed his disapproval upon the possibility of gathering energy from the atomic nucleus.

In December l938, two German scientists Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann, discovered the nuclear fi ssion. By bombing the Uranius with neutrons, amongst reactive products, they discovered some ele-ments of an intermediate number of mass, such as the radioactive Barium, a reaction which could not be explained. In l939, Lise Meit-ner and Otto Frisch, announced the solution to this enigma*11. On

*11 Such discoveries gave Einstein confi rmation of the equivalence between mass and energy (E=mc2), as theoretically stated in his theory of restricted relativity,


144

the 2nd of August 1939, Albert Einstein, informed President F. D. Roosevelt about the danger of a German bomb by writing that fatal letter thus marking the beginning of the American programme for the creation of an atomic bomb. On the 2nd of December 1942, under the supervision of Enrico Fermi at the University of Chicago, the fi rst nuclear reactor in the world was placed into function. Its power was initially of 0,5 W, equal to 1010 fi ssions per second.

The experiment confermed the possibility of carrying out a chain reaction.

In your opinion, what should all these scientists have done, shut their mouths as alchemists had done for several centuries? Or should they have turned to the whole of mankind proclaiming: “After sev-eral years of research, we have discovered the way of creating en-ergy from the atomic nucleus. With such energy, it will no longer be necessary to gather tons of carbon or petrol in order to produce electricity in your homes; you will simply require seventy grams of natural Uranium in order to produce enough energy in your homes for a period of one year. In any case, it is for your own good that we prefer to hide the physical procedures that allow the exploiting of such energy; energy which we consider highly dangerous, especially if used for war. You should therefore be patient and wait a further one hundred years and then you will probably (and this “probably” is of high importance because, there’s the rub!) you will have “clean” energy; and considering the unlimited reserves of deuterium in the waters of the sea, it will probably also be a free resource”.

What if in a few decades mankind was able to make use of the nuclear fusion for the scope of energetic provision, thus exploiting the immense resources of deuterium present in the waters of the sea, and after another twenty or thirty years discovered that such physical process represents a source of energy saturated in negative points? And what can be added, if we move onto the fi eld of biotechnology

as outlined in a renowned article, published when he was still below the age of 26: the nucleus of the Uranius atom was splitting in two freeing a considerably high energetic entity.


145

as well as genetic manipulation?*12 What surprises does the future have in store for us for the next thirty or forty years?

Now, in order for you to comprehend the concept of error in the best way, it is essential that I provide you with some examples: do you believe that the invention of the internal combustion engine (Lenoir, 1860), in which cluster of ideas could we collocate it? Sev-eral people would surely collocate it in the cluser of ideas of the twenty “things” that include some negative factors that are hidden or at least unobservable and unquantifi able in the short term because they believe that Lenoir in 1860 could not imagine what long-term damage his invention could have caused to the earth’s environment, to mankind and other animal species [obviously considering all that has caused the expliting of petrol, both on the fragile structures of our ecosystem and the political and economic ambit. Multinational petrol companies and in particular their unlimited power (one can also believe that they are able to choose upon the fate of the whole of mankind), represent the worse thing that Lenoir could ever have imagined]. He could have never forseen the degree of industrial, eco-nomic and political development which mankind would have reached with the passing of decades. He could have never forseen the notable demographic increase in the world which from the beginning of the last century until now (in spite of two great wars) that graphically has followed an exponential curb. In addition to all this, what gave the decisive input, was the “fame-honour-money” factor; and to top it all, if we wish to describe things on a purely humanitarian-idealistic level, you should read the speech on nuclear scission and realize where “the rub is”. .

“In this Theatre of Madness*13, as someone already stated four hundred years ago , man is nothing but... “a poor actor who trium-

*12 Carried out on the cells of breeding animals and that of vegetables used for the diet of human beings; the latest cause an indirect risk for mankind (genetically modifi ed vegetables) if used in diets of breeding animals.

*13 William Shakespeare (King Lear)


146

phantly and eagerly spends his hour on the stage and then nothing more is known of him”.*14

But we should not simply limit to consider this banal example; let’s move on to another fi eld of science, in the biomedical one: in your opinion, what should biologists and doctors do all over the world: wake up one morning and proclaim to the entire human-ity: “After several decades of studies and research, we have reached the conclusion that 40%*15 of medicines we use to cure your simple and common illnesses can, even within several years, generate cancer both in the subject who has made use of such medication as well as in the children he will have born in the course of his existence (even after several decades from birth). Should we also mention vaccines, which weaken your immune system and sometimes bring on diseases without which they would have never manifested themselves. We therefore believe that in three hundred years of history, medicine has done nothing but weaken our human species further more. What is right and what is wrong nobody knows and nobody can know; unfor-tunately even medical science doesn’t have steps to walk on. Must we stop in the middle of the stairway, cry on spilled milk and walk back down with a blushed face or walk up hoping to reach in the future and embrace at least one branch of the Absolute Truth?

The survival instinct is innate in every human being and we have therefore no intention of dying of hunger after three hundred years of studies and research, nevertheless the pharmaceutical multina-tional companies would not allow this because they would kill us beforehand. We have therefore opted for the continuation of this long and hard climb.

You are free to do what you believe is right; if you are not able to do so in your youth and recover from a simple fl u by using phy-totherapeutical, omeopathic or psychological method (and so on), you should know that you always have a choice:

*14 William Shakespeare (King Lear)*15 This percentage also includes all the medication whose teratogen or iatrogen

potential are known or suspected; or in the worst case, where both are found.


147

a) to die at the age of 20 due to a simple fl u, providing a small contribution to the enforcing of the human species;

b) or take antibiotics and avoiding death in the in the prime of your life obviously bearing in mind that perhaps at the age of forty, you will develop liver cancer.”

Any mentally healthy person will choose to take antibiotics as it is written in our neurogenetic code: the survival instinct.

What is therefore good and what is bad? If we analyze this from a point of view which gathers our origin from our own nature (which, if we remember Oscar Wilde’s thoughts on the concept of Good and Bad, we could defi ne as Wildian), we could state that a sick person taking antibiotics, may be viewed as all that we conceive and classify below the parameter of good; because what he has done (by taking antibiotics) is uniquely conceived as a refl ex conditioned by his own animal nature (common and ordinary).

But let’s go back to what our good doctor has just proclaimed; in one sentence he said (by casting a shadow on the Hippocratic Oath): “in three hundred years of history, medicine has done nothing but increasingly weaken our human species”. This may seem like a paradox to you, but this situation has been able to develop slowly in three hundred years of history (the weakening of our species), gathers its origin from our ... survival instinct”. What is therefore right or wrong in this brief earthly existence? Should we continue to walk on the steps of science, accepting in the most absolute way what Dante Alighieri stated a few centuries ago, that is: “You were not made to live as brutes but to acquire virtue and knowledge”; or should we stop and start going against our own nature? (because this is what we would be doing if we started to suppress our genius and human creativity). Science, that is, its development, is nothing but a refl ex conditioned by our own nature. Wanting to suppress our scientifi c development would mean suppress the genius and human creativity; it would mean to invert the fl ux of time (thus triggering off some kind of human regression).

Hoping for such event, would be like hoping that sooner or later the Earth inexorably slips between the fauces of a Black Hole; but not even in this case, mankind will be forced towards an inevitable


148

regression and extinction (even if in this case, it would be more ap-propriate to talk about total annihilation), if he, on that day, will have reached the same tecnological-evolutional level of our dear visi-tors.

As you may have already seen, placing inventions or scientifi c discoveries in the cluster of ideas of the seventy “things” which solely present positive sides, or in the cluster of ideas of the twenty “things” which present positive as well as negative hidden points; or fi nally, in the cluster of ideas of the ten “things” which present evident and remarkable negative sides, this entails the use of chain methods of reasoning that are rather long and complex to carry out, thus creat-ing serious diffi culties for the one trying to make the right choice for the purpose of collocating the invention or scientifi c descovery in the most appropriate cluster of ideas.*16

I will now quote in the following lines, an excerption of an article that appeared on the Italian magazine “Scienza & Vita” (Jan. ‘95), which looks at the following question: Vaccines and their relation-ship with the industrial economy; an article which I consider to be rather signifi cative to help comprehend the complex mechanisms of the “Logic of money”, which for several decades have altered in an apparently irreversable way the conscious of mankind; making the same, the principle cause of all harm which is troubling humanity. (Wars, for example, constitute one of such harms and mean billions of dollars for the multinational companies of death).

Below is the excerpt of the article under discussion:

*16 An interesting fact is that several demographers in the 50s believed that towards the third millenium, the production of food on Earth, would no longer have been suffi cient for most of the world population due to the relevant demogra-phic increase. Such demographers, had not actually considered the scientifi c and technologic development of the 60s and 70s. Someone could now object and state: how about Third World countries? Unfotunately these countries are subjected to the Logic of money; a logic which ensures that richer countries be-come richer whilst those that are already poor, increasingly poorer. [It isn’t such a diffi cult task to realize in which way and in what measure these are strictly interconnected, Gause’s principle of competitive exclusion (in this case refers to various human races; in fact, generally, Gause’s principle can be intended and uniquely associated to several aspects of cohabitation between different animal species) and the above mentioned phenomenon of the Logic of money.]


149

“The American scientifi c magazine (...) has interviewed the best in the world working in the fi eld of vaccines, as many as one hundred researchers, responsible for the health of the public and producers of pharmaceuticals, repeating the question: which vaccines are actually necessary? The fi rst on the list is those against AIDS (...) for the Third World. The list is then followed by the vaccine against malaria and one against tuberculosis (...) whilst the western world demands vac-cines against RSV and pneumococcus. Will they be available in ten years’ time? (asked Science): “No”, replied researchers in a chorus. “In spite of the fact that the vaccines are the most effective instru-ment and the intervention of doctors with the most favourable cost/benefi t relationship, industry doesn’t invest in this sector”. “Because capital invested in vaccine research does not make a profi t, it is best invested in symptomatic pharmaceutical products, as they provide a gold mine...”. (...) It may appear to be a cynical answer but fi gures agree with them. According to a study carried out by UNICEF the world’s vaccine market guarantees immunity for the whole of a life-time, is worth three billion dollars per year, as opposed to the 3.5 per year provided by Zantic, one of the several medications against ul-cers. It is a bewildering fi gure because ulcers, an infl ammation which gradually erodes the gastric mucous membrane is due to a bacteria: the Helicobacter pylori and could be defi nitely be eradicated with a vaccine. Instead, in spite of the fact that the Helicobacter colonizes the stomach of approximately three quarters of the world population and favours the formation of gastric carcinoma, industry looked at the fi gures and decided that it simply isn’t worth it. If vaccines were necessary prevalently to the Third World, the game is not worth the candle...(...)”.


150

Tempus omnia medetur

“Time is nothing but the form of our internal intuition. If from time, we eliminate the particular condition of our sensibility,even the

concept of time disappears: time is not inherent to objects themselves but simply to the subject which senses them”.

IMMANUEL KANT

If we trace a graph in function of time, of the one hundred “things” that in the course of his evolution mankind has “generated”, we will notice that the seventy “things” only presenting positive sides, date back to ancient times, whilst the twenty “things” which conceal negative sides or aspects belong to more recent times and the ten “things” that present evident and numerous negative sides date back to extremely recent (modern) times..

We can therefore reach this conclusion: the more the complexity of the scientifi c-tecnological-political-economic sphere increases, the more mankind is inclined to commiting voluntary and involuntary errors.

The increase of involuntary errors is directly proportional to the increase of the complexity of the scientifi c-tecnological-political-economic sphere. The increase of voluntary errors is due to two fac-tors, one which is predominant (a) and one which is of secondary importance (b):*17

*17 In Einstein’s latest years, after having stopped and looked at a brief evaluation of all the developments in the scientifi c, technologic, political and economic developments that in fi fty years were accomplished thanks to a brief period of great creativity which in the fi rst years of the beginning of the century brou-ght light to all of his talent, he came out with this brief self-critique: “If I had known, I would have chosen to be a plumber”


151

a) the ever increasing complexity of the scientifi c-tecnological-political-economic sphere.

b) the infl uence of money on mankind (which I will discuss and deepen in one of the following paragraphs).

In the last few years, mankind is trying to cure all the voluntary errors which he has commited in the course of his own evolution. Out of the ten “things” which present evident and cospicuous nega-tive sides, mankind had to create (and still trying to create) remedies which present evident positive sides.

But are we actually sure that these remedies, deep inside, do not hide numerous negative sides?

And the virus spreads... out of twenty involuntary errors, another fi ve involuntary errors will be added to it; involuntary errors “acquire more consistence” and are joined to an additional ten voluntary errors (that are more serious), mankind then creates another ten “things” (not necessarily restricted to the scientifi c-tecnological fi eld) which present several positive sides (but some negative sides) and having done this commits an additional ten involuntary errors... and so on...

The complex function brushed and sketched on page 154, cul-minates in this case, in an hypothetical future around the year 2’200 AC. (such peak in any case, could be reached even before the year 2’200 AC by mankind or, contrary to popular belief, several centuries later. But we can’t even exclude the case that such peak has already been reached by our animal species and that in the last few years, humanity is already in a phase which we could defi ne as: “recovery of consciousness”). If this peak shall be reached in the centuries to come, the same could represent in the worst case, an extinction of our animal species; something which I strongly doubt, considering the great biologic adaptability of the human species against environ-mental changes that can be caused by a cosmic factor or by our own species with voluntary and involuntary errors, which can directly or indirectly infl uence mankind (principally through his diet). Instead, at best, if this apex will be reached in the centuries to come, the same could represent a turning point, a change of direction, a recovery of consciousness; in other terms, the human thought would start trav-


152

elling through some analogue-deductive structures, yet prevalently remaining attached to the same binary structures, which are typical of each animal species that is still rather young

When I talk about our animal species, pointing out that the same is a still young species, I refer to the fact that, if we consider the entire history of life on Earth (which started around 3’000 million years ago with the appearance of the fi rst living cells) and we compare it with the history of mankind (we “only” started seventy million years ago), we easily come to realize how far on the evolutionary plan, our species has yet to go.

If we go back to the concept of turning point, we could assume that when this factor will take place [taking into account that such factor still hasn’t happened; and that all initiatives and ecologic movements that have taken place in the last few decades (trying to be idealists and thus admitting that in this case money does not come into it), they would witness], the infl uence of money on mankind would slowly start to decrease. The double equation:

+ money = + power = + freedom

would also start to slowly loose its illusory value in the mind of the most “educated”, therefore leaving room to the development of a less mechanistic and rather more systemic mind towards life and all that surrounds it. If we now go back and analyze the graph on page 154, we will notice that after the apex on the axis of ordered (“things”) the human species, in the course of centuries, will still commit voluntary and involuntary errors and it is natural that such thing should happen because proper and signifi cant changes in an animal species may be observed only in lapse of time ranging for thousands of years (still considering the increase, with the passing of milleniums, of what is commonly defi ned in the evolutionary biology as a “evolutionary facilitation”, of signifi cant mutations, signifi cant because they could take place one after another, within extremely brief lapses of time, namely quantifi able in centuries).*18

*18 In evolutionistic biology, the concept of evolutionary facilitation is intended in such terms, that is the way in which genes are organized, in addition to the way


153

Having terminated the period of voluntary and involuntary errors, humanity will see itself projected into a future rich of ideas, discover-ies and inventions which we could defi ne more or less “neutral” and that with the passing of centuries, they will be inclined to stabilize on a more or less neutral scientifi c-technological level (see graph on page 154).

Now, what could erroneously be thought is that such ideas, dis-coveries, inventions which with the passing of centuries become more and more “neutral”, are the fruit of a growing “contraction” of the scientifi c-technological progress, some kind of “about-turn” in each fi eld of the Universal Science (where we can fi nd sciences such as economics, politics, physics, biology, etc).

This is absolutely implausible. The Universal Science, will con-tinue in the course of centuries and milleniums, to go up those steps which fi nally lead to the end of the Infi nite Ladder, to the knowledge of Absolute Truth.

Scientifi c and Technological truth therefore, in several hundred years, will reach peaks so highly elevated that today’s humanity can-not even dare to imagine. But it will no longer be a single scientifi c and technological pseudoprogress, a progress in contrast with its sur-rounding nature, a progress which indirectly takes away life from us, slowly sucking life from the one who generated us and who we depend on (Needless to say that I am talking about our Earth…but I shall mention it anyway).

It will instead be a progress symbiosis with nature, some kind of ecoprogress in an almost perfect harmony (but let’s not forget that even fl ying saucers burn the grass they land on when they come to pay us a visit)*19 with the terrestrial and extra-terrestrial environment. To help you understand, if I make a simple example, we would no longer see fl ying saucers loudly wondering about in the skies spread-

in which the mutagenic agents have an effect on them, facilitates the channeling of evolution in certain directions

*19 In reality, the phenomenon may appear to have nothing to do with the apparent effects created by combustion but rather with the effects due to the action of intense fi elds constituted by electromagnetic waves that are similar to micro-waves.


154

ing tons and tons of Kerosene combusted gas , but we will see ma-chines that will no longer be in contrast with nature, machines which will move across space thanks to the same forces provided by nature (gravitational, magnetic fi elds, etc.), machines (perhaps of a discoidal shape?) which, by interacting with the powers of nature they will be able to perform in the sky, formidable evolutions characterized by changes of speed in unimaginable directions and intensity (and at times, even unobservable) by today’s mankind.


155

Denarius Nummus

“All comes from nothing and from this common origin derives the duty of fraternity and mercy towards all creatures”.

BUDDHA ,563-483 A.C.

“All that lives is your neighbour”. MAHATMA GANDHI

The infl uence of money on mankind:

The factor that we previously recognized as the secondary cause of all human voluntary errors and that we have designated with the terms: “infl uence of money”, is generally conceived in posi-tive terms (on an individual and at times global term) by the most “educated”individual, uniquely as a refl ex of the following equation, more precisely:


it is a double equation in perfect harmony with the mechanicistic and therefore reductionist thought of mankind, who got to know his major development with the coming of the Cartesian-Newtonian era. It could be said that the mechanicistic conception of life, arose from the birth of mankind because it is substantially the fruit of a thought that (prevalently) travels through binary structures; but in a rather signifi cant way, it placed its roots in the mind of mankind only


156

a few centuries ago, with the coming of the previously mentioned Cartesian-Newtonian era.*20

In such equation (which if accepted and unconsciously assimi-lated in the most absolute way, leads to an exasperated form of indi-vidualism in any individual), so aspects of the life of mankind that are fundamentally important are not taken into account namely:

a) Having reached a certain level on the evolutionary ladder, each human being depends on the other.

b) Our lives are in the hands of our peers; just like their lives is in our hands.

c) Our life, the one of other animal and vegetable beings, of our earth and the entire universe is part of a bigger picture of a complex game of interdependences.

I feel it superfl uous to specify that the above mention equation (+ money = + power = + freedom), not only makes no sense on an individual level (factor which may seem rather unlikely to some peo-ple) but rather if it is considered on a global level referred to the whole of mankind, it assumes a worrying aspect of a self-destructive phylosophy.

The mechanicistic vision of life:

Mainly for practical reasons, when the level of information and notions related to a determined sector of science (even in the politi-cal, economical, social, etc…) reaches the top (which is the maximum the mind of a common individual is able to assimilate in a relative number of years of study, in order to later make use of his knowledge during the remaining years of his life), this is when the inevitable necessity to classify this newborn branch of science comes in, with a new name which originates from the mother of science it derives from; and this is how from biology arises physiology, zoology, botan-ics and so on. The point I would like to make and to help my reader understand, namely what mankind has quickly tried to classify as

*20 In order to fully comprehend the meaning of the expression: Cartesian-New-tonian Era, the following book should be read: “The turning Point”, by Fritjof Capra (Simon & Schuster, New York)


157

mother sciences in the last few centuries (such as physics, biology, chemistry, psychology...) are nothing but branches of a single mother science which we could defi ne as: Universal Science.

It is only for the past few years that mankind is slowly under-standing the close interdependences existing between the different mother sciences; and this is how biologic phenomenas are explained and defi ned in psychological terms and vice versa, chemical phenom-enas in terms anthropological, geological or even astronomical.

Everything is in correlation with everything:

Therefore, life appears to us as game of interdependences; mankind can exist only if everything that is around him exists. If we destroy the environment we live in, we destroy ourselves. Unfortunately, this is what has been happening in the last few years; mankind is implacably de-stroying our one and only mother, the one who generated, our Earth.

According to Englishman James Lovelock, even the earth (which he calls Gaia, name of the female divinity Earth at the time of An-cient Greece) could be considered as a living organism and therefore “a thinking being”; and it can’t be said that one day, the same will rebel against the animal species which is sucking life from her: the human species, more precisely the cancer of the earth.

Perhaps, she is already doing this, through the hole in the Ozone layer. And just like in a cure for cancer, mankind apart from killing cancer-causing cells, it also kills several healthy ones in its body, the earth will have to carry out the same procedure, slowly killing not only mankind (if she will be able to) but also other animal and vegetable species.

At this point it is therefore justifi able asking ourselves a ques-tion: “how many milleniums”*21 should the human species still await

*21 Mutations which are more or less signifi cant during the evolution of an animal species, are solely observable on timeframes ranging for several thousands of years. In the most fortunate cases, such as in the example of the human species, taking into consideration that it is now located in a stage that the potentiality of evolutionary facilitation (compare with previous notes), they have reached extre-mely high levels, it is possible to verify signifi cant mutations even in timeframes quantifi able in centuries.


158

(supposing that it does not extinguish itself prematurely) in order to completely free itself from those neuro-genetic impulses that date back to ancient times*22 and that are so dangerous for its survival (haughtiness, avarice, lust, anger, envy, greed and sloth…strangely enough the seven deadly sins) and from that mechanicistic mental-ity (obviously as dangerous for the survival of our species) which continues to obscure our view of a reality so different from the one that we currently know?

If mankind is still highly infl uenced by determined neuro-genetic impulses, , such as hatred, envy, selfi shness, greed, (materialism), rac-ism [yes, I feel that even racism is the fruit of such impulses, in spite of the fact that several consider it (or it would perhaps be better to say conceal it) like a phenomenon deriving from a bold individual or collective ignorance], this means that it is still located on a medium level of its own evolutionary ladder.

Now, if it is true that evolution, with milleniums to come, will provide our species with an additional or further layers of cerebral cortex, human thought could start to get through others brain struc-tures, not necessarely only through binary structures.

Through binary-analogue-deductive structures (more precisely, prevalently analogue) mankind will perhaps be able to discover the secrets of his subconscious without having to resort to hypnosis. Through such “alternative” structures, the thought of mankind will therefore be able to give a death blow to the mechanicstic vi-sion of life (defi ned as the fruit of a thought that prevalently trav-els through binary structures) to move to a more wide vision of existence that is systemic and founded upon the awareness of the interrelation of all phenomena: physical, biologica, psychological, social and cultural.

Likewise, the neurogenetic impulses of an ancient kind which for milleniums have characterized our mind, will be suppressed further with the formation of a new cerebral cortex which (perhaps princi-pally within the association cortex, obviously more developed thanks to a new layer of grey matter), all information or stimulus reaching

*22 The argument on neurogenetic impulses will be discussed further in the fourth from the last chapter.


159

the reticular system of activation and the lymbic system, will be able to be further analyzed and differently elaborated thanks to preva-lently analogue circuits.

However, such theory also presents two sides of a coin; in a way it could be correct or totally incorrect.

First of all, it is essential to bear in mind that the parametres of good and bad (which are substantially refl exes conditioned by our own nature, as previously discussed), reach a certain degree of evolu-tion in the animal species, tend to merge together loosing in a more or less signifi cative way any kind of value or identity that our still young animal species is used to attribute to itself. In order to fi nally defi ne in a more complete way the darker side of the coin, more precisely the net contrast with the theory exposed previously, I will use the same words of F.Capra:

“(...) The neo-cortex origins in the most ancient evolutionary phasis of mammals and developed itself in the human species in an explosive rythm, without precedent in the history of evolution and fi nally became stable approximately 50’000 years ago. By developing our abstract thinking ability at such rapid rate, it appears that we have lost the im-portant capacity to ritualize social confl icts. In the animal kingdom, aggression rarely develops itself inasmuch as it leads to the death of two adversaries. In fact, a fi ght is ritualized and usually ends only when the loser admits having being defeated, yet remains relatively unharmed. Such wisdom disappeared or stayed hidden in the depth of the emerging human species. In the process of creation of an abstract world, it ap-pears that we have lost contact with the reality of life and that we have become the only organisms that are often unable to cooperate with its peers and that bring death upon them (...).”

Therefore, could “bad aliens” actually exist in the universe?It’s rather possible that if we still exist (in spite of the enormous

damage that we have caused to this planet in just one hundred years), it is due to the fact that perhaps, for someone, in some part of the universe, we are useful.


160

“The greatest ability consists in hiding the bad beneath the appearance of the good”.

C.JAQUINOT E J.DELAYE The man of the future will only have a vague memory of what we

now associate to the concepts of affection e sentimentalism, but this will not mean that he will be more cruel towards his peers and with-out any kind of respect for them. The man of the future, endowed with a prevalently abstract-analogue-deductive thought, will under-stand, help and deeply respect his peers and any other terrestrial biological entity because he will be fully conscious of the enormous advantages that such behaviour will grant to his own lifestyle.

Egoism will lead mankind towards the day of his extinction; how-ever, with time, it will change and adopt rather more complex and inexplicable appearance and will perhaps make us forget its existence; but believe me, it will always be around us, because it is only with it that we are able to survive.

Egoism is a refl ex conditioned by our own survival instinct and with time, it will, “learn” to conceal itself behind the thick web of social relationships that up to now have let us make progress (but especially survive) and that in future, it will surely hand over another great share of freedom.


161

The equations of evolution

“A man, considered as a system subjected to behaviour is rather a simple being. The apparent complexity of his behaviour through

time is largely a refl ex of the complexity of the environment it fi nds himself into”.HERBERT SIMON

In order to provide a full outlook on this brief chapter on human evolution, I would now like to move on to the concept of: “The infl u-ence of money on mankind”.

First of all, it must be said that it is not strictly right to talk about an increase of the infl uence of money on mankind in the past three decades (as many could assume, considering the fact that approxi-mately three centuries ago, the mechanicistic of life was able to sig-nifi cantly impose itself and therefore able to start its slow action of “inebriation” of human thought, with the coming of the Cartesian-Newtonian era), forasmuch money, since the day it was conceived and coined, it has had a more or less signifi cance on the psyche of each and every human being.

If in all the past centuries, we were unable to become fully aware of how money infl uenced the human psyche, we owe it to the fact that such “infl uence” existed at a time of a low level of complexity of political-economic-scientifi c-tecnological sphere which obviously could not have unfairly been quietened (as we will see later on in this text) and to be the principle cause of all the bad in our civilization, because such wrongdoings were still awaiting to come out and would therefore only emerge when the level of complexity of the P-E-S-T sphere would reach a certain degree of development.


162

Now that such “infl uence of money” is found projected in a his-torical period that could be defi ned as a high level of complexity of the P-E-S-T sphere, we can now see the fi rst signifi cant damages caused to our planet seriously threatening our survival.

At what point is it therefore right to assume that voluntary errors are also caused by the infl uence of money on mankind? Such as-sumption could be correct, only if we conceive voluntary errors, as the mathematical product of the infl uence of money and the level of com-plexity of the P-E-S-T sphere (I thought it appropriate to facilitate the understanding of such concepts by using simple linear equations):

Eq.1.0:

( I M ) x ( P-E-S-T’s CLevel ) = # voluntary errors

Let’s now analyze this equation.In this case IM (infl uence of money) is defi ned as constant whilst

P-E-S-T’s CLevel (the level of complexity of the political-economi-cal-scientifi c-tecnological sphere) represents a variable.

Now, up to what point can we conceive IM as a constant? IM varies in function to the biologic evolution (which should absolutely not be confused with scientifi c progress) of the human species, more precisely: each step taken on the evolutionary ladder decreases the value of IM. But in what measure does IM, in function of the human evolution, gradually looses its value?

Supposing that each step on our evolutionary ladder represents in numeric terms a value of approximately 0,0001 units, we can easily see how long the “halving-time” of the IM value is (we could even talk about milleniums). If we therefore add the evolutionary factor in the previous equation, we will obtain the following:

Eq.1.1:

[( IM) : (EvF)] x (P-E-S-T’s CLevel) = # voluntary errors

Where EvF represents the evolutionary factor to which we give the symbolic value of 1. Each step on the human evolutionary ladder, we add to the EvF the value of 0,0001 (1 + 0,0001= 1,0001).


163

We therefore note that the (IM:EvF) value, remains more or less constant in the course of several centuries.

If we now analyze the variable that we have defi ned with the term of: “Level of complexity of the P-E-S-T sphere”, we will note that the latest more or less considerably varies in the course of several centuries. If we therefore remain with the 1.1 equation, it appears clear and evident that the increase of voluntary errors is principally due to the increase of the P-E-S-T’s CLevel, and secondarily to the infl uence of money on mankind.

Now, we know that the infl uence of money on mankind is es-sentially due to the fact that our thought, which prevalently travels through binary structures, leads us to summarize that if we are not really careful, the following equation based on an individualistic plan appears as follows:


Our thought, with the evolution, will fi nd itself to travel through alternative structures which are largely analogue; the concept of a binary mould that now imposes itself in each human mind with the above stated double equation, with the passing of milleniums, will lose its value, therefore decreasing in an analogue way and in a di-rectly proportional way, the infl uence of money on mankind.

If we therefore wish to substitute in equation 1.1, the evolution factor with another factor that we could defi ne as : “Degree of ana-logical form of human thought”.

The day in which the value of (IM:EvF) will more or less be nil, that is when mankind will have reach the “peak” of evolution and as a consequence the level of complexity of the P-E-S-T sphere will have reach the top, mankind will no longer need to worry about his new voluntary errors (because he will no langer make any); but rather about his old voluntary errors. What about involuntary errors?

They could be defi ned with the following equation:

Eq.1.2:

(P-E-S-T’s CLevel) : EvF = # voluntary errors


164

With the increase of the degree of evolution, up to what point do involuntary errors tend to disappear since the P-E-S-T ’s CLevel also respectively increases? Unfortunately, the tragic conclusion is the fol-lowing: makind shall commit a slow and irreversible evolution until it starts to fi nd remedies to its own involuntary errors. On the basis of these latest conclusions, we can therefore summarize a fi nal and global equation, which is:

Eq.1.3*23

[(P-E-S-T’s CLevel) x (1+IM)] : (EvF) = # voluntary and involuntary errors*24

In a distant future, perhaps near to the beginning of the fi fth mil-lenium, educated human beings will begin to accumulate wealth not to acquire more power in order to exploit his peers to their liking (as they will have fi nally understood that freedom obtained in such a way is risky and fl eeting; and the countless wars that have character-ized the history of human civilization are there between the lines of millions of books to demonstrate it), but to equally distribute each kind of goodness between the inhabitants of this planet because they will know that only from such behaviour they will be able to gain advantages.

But it’s still too early for all this to take place. We the passing of centuries, slowly, what we now call the market economy, will trans-form itself, without us realizing, into some sort of planned economy. What Marx dreamt over a century ago will be realized only in a few milleniums. Usually, it is claimed that geniuses represent the man from the future; but they are extremely rare those who are born a few milleniums in advance.

*23 Compare with graph on page 128*24 On the basis of this last equation, it would not be a venture to claim that even

human evolution can be defi ned with a simple algorithmically compressible string.


165

Human, too human

“Therefore, if all members of scientifi c societies are even too many for a single object of human science, their complexity turns out

to be insuffi cient as well before it can elaborate makind’s science in general”.

DIDEROT

Neurogenetic impulses of an ancient mould:Neurogenetic impulses of an ancient mould are innate in the minds

of each individual, independently from the human race it belongs to. All these impulses are radicated in our subconscious and appear to guarantee our survival. Unfortunately though, not in each ethnic group; in fact, G.F. Gause’s*25 Principle of competitive exclusion, is even observable between different races of mankind. It is enough to think about man as a white north-western race that is able to ma-nipulate for his own advantage, the behaviour of entire civilizations belonging to any race, on vast areas of each earthly continent as well as exploit indigenous labour and at times organizing, whenever necessary, civil wars with indetermined deadline.

(Whoever believes that colonizing simply means bringing wealth to civilizations that are technologically less evolved than ours is com-pletely wrong).

The Intensity of Neurogenetic Impulses varies from each individu-

*25 Gause’s principle states that if two species compete for the same limited re-sourses, in situations where they are both present, one of them will be more able to exploit or control the access to such resource and in the end, will eliminate the other.


166

al and in our species (human) even from race to race. It appears that the evolution of our species has actually ensured that some impulses have been “waned” with the passing of time, because they are no longer considered so necessary to guarantee the survival of at least one human race. This could also be true but the truth of the matter is that some impulses (which according to several people they have been increasingly been waned within centuries), such as the racial impulse, seem to be rather predominant (at a species level) in a mul-titude of neurogenetic impulses*26 and which (at an ethnic level) and according to their principle characteristics and respective potentials, give origin to the phenomenon of competitive human exclusion; thus a phenomenon that is necessary (for each animal species that is still young) to guarantee the survival of at least one human race. At this point, someone could object and state: “but it is well known that a good distribution of economic resources at a world level would be enough in order to completely erase hunger from the face of the earth: how limited are such resources on our planet anyway? And at how far is the competitive human exclusion justifi able?”

Well, I would reply in the following way: the phenomenon of competitive human exclusion even in this case is a refl ex conditioned by a series of neurogenetic impulses of an ancient mould; when such

*26 Amongst these, we fi nd the aggressiveness impulse, the ratial impulse, the sexual impulse [meant as a natural-intentional predisposition for increasing the birth rate, more precisely like some kind of “procreational instinct”, which is general-ly manifested through the triggering of the phenomenon of falling in love. The sexual impulse is uniquely meant as: “research of personal pleasure”; in order to make things not too complicated, it is not considered in the theory of neuro-genetic impulses. It is anyhow essential to bear in mind that such impulse plays an important role in the birthrate increase, only in Third World countries where there is a low level of scientifi c-cultural education; whilst it has no infl uence on the birthrate of more “advanced” countries.

There are therefore two kinds of sexual impulses: Sexual Impulse (A) = “procreation instinct” Sexual Impulse (B) = “research of personal pleasure.” When we calculate the individual intensity of a neurogenetic impulse of a hu-

man being living in a Third World country, the numerical value of potentiality of his sexual impulse (A), will therefore increase as a result of the infl uence of a sexual impulse of a B type. It is easier to consider by calculating a value that is the sum of the two sexual impulses (A+B)], the emotional impulse, and so on.


167

impulses will dwindle with the passing of milleniums, such phenom-enon will likely disappear.

And at that point there will no longer be a reason for worry-ing about how limited resources on the earth for a population that should exceed ten billion individuals actually are, because thanks to their wealth, entire human civilizations will lean towards a nearly zero rate demongraphic increase”.

Making a clear distinction between neurogenetic impulses that have actually “waned” due to the evolution and between those that have remained more or less constant since the midst of time, therefore appears to be a rather ardous task.

(The only impulse that we could insert in the category of im-pulses that have remained more or less constant since the midst of time, is perhaps only the sexual one; but this seems to be more than normal, as it is the one that principally guarantees the survival of our species).

However, what we should bear in mind is that evolution plays an important role in the mutation of neurogenetic impulses. Such poten-tiality mutations of neurogenetic impulses are essential and therefore of primary importance in order to guarantee the survival of the entire humankind. Keeping in consideration that the infl uence of money on mankind will decrease with the passing of milleniums (or if we are lucker, centuries) and that therefore, the sustenance means will also increase (prevalently food, water and shelter) for all the civilizations of this planet, the intensity of the sexual impulse will proportionally diminish against the infl uence of money; this decrease of intensity of the sexual impulse will anyhow be uniquely due to a radical change of conditions of the external environment which means that the level of biologic potentiality of such impulse will be comparable and therefore more or less identical to the current one even within the distance of centuries or milleniums.

A mistake that should not be made is to believe that if in all the extremely poor civilizations of this planet, the sexual impulse is rather pronounced (still meant as natural-intentional predisposition to help increase the birthrate), this is due to a biologic factor. This is absolutely untrue.

In fact, each neurogenetic impulse, including the sexual one, can


168

considerably be amplifi ed or attenuated depending on the external environment (defi ned also signifi cantly by the models of teaching and scientifi c-cultural education of the environment*27 under discussion) that are relating to the single individual or human race under discus-sion, yet still conserving the same level of biologic potentiality.

The individual intensity of the Neurogenetic Impulse is meant as the value of the Average Potentiality of the Neurogenetic Impulse (obtained by summing the values of potentiality of each single and well determined neurogenetic impulse of the individual under discus-sion, over the number of such impulses), divided by the Evolutionary Constant (a fi xed value which depends on the biologic evolutionary level of the animal species under discussion; in this case mankind) and multiplied by the Degree of Hostility of the External Environment (in determined environments for example, where the elements and infrastructures necessary to reach a good level of schientifi c-cultural education level are missing, such Degree of Hostility considerably increases in value) . We therefore obtain the following equation:

Eq.2.0

Iind.NI = [(P0 + P1 + P2 + ...Pn) . HDEG ] : (np . kE)

Where Iind.NI is the Individual intensity of a Neurogenetic Impulse; P is the value of Potentiality of a single and well determined neuro-genetic impulse (for example the emotional one); np is the number of neurogenetic impulses taken into consideration; kE is the value of the Evolutionary Constant and HDEG is the value of the Degree of Hostility of the External Environment.

The Intensity of the Race of Neurogenetic Impulse (Irac.NI) is to be intended as the value of the Coeffi cient of Potentiality of the Neu-rogenetic Impuse related to a determined human race (αp), divided by the Evolutionary Constant (kE) and multiplied by the Degree of

*27 When we talk of environment, in this case we mean a country, a nation, a city…or any area or region of the earth which is limited by political boundaries.


169

Hostility of the External Environment. We therefore obtain the fol-lowing equation:

Eq.2.1

(Irac.NI) = (αp . HDEG) : kE

The Intensity of a Neurogenetic Impulse Species (ISPEC.NI), is to be intended as the average value obtained by summing the values of (Irac.NI) and dividing everything by the number of human races (nrac.). This is how we reach the following equation:

(ISPEC.NI) = [(αp1 . HDEG1) + ...(αpn + HDEGn )] : (kE . nrac.)

Note that : The Degree of Hostility of the External Environment, in the equa-

tion 2.0 is related to the area of action (especially the working envi-ronment + various aspects of a daily life in a specifi c village or city) of the individual under discussion; in eq. 2.1 it is related to a vast territory which could include one or more nations, whilst eq. 2.2 is related to the entire surface of our planet.

Considerations concerning the different Degrees of Hostility of

the external environment upon a subject:

Within the Individual Intensity of the Neurogenetic Impulse, fac-tors that could for example increase the Degree of Hostility on the external environment upon a subject could be the following: psycho-logical pressures / mistreatment on behalf of senior members of staff in the working environment, psychological pressures/ mistreatment in a family environment, continuous arguments or quarrels with a partner which are not compatible with the nature of the subject at hand, and so on. Such factors constitute the Degree of Actual Hos-tility of the external environment on the subject. On the other hand, there are other factors which make up the Virtual Degree of Hostility of the external environment of the subject at hand. The Degree of Hostility is therefore separable in two typologic models, the sum of


170

which defi ne the “absolute” value of such Degree. The factors which for example could increase the “value” of Degree of Virtual Hostility of the individual taken into consideration, are the following: sexual assault being suffered at an early age, the memory of a serious event (violent death or homicide) that has been seen or lived personally, the memory of a theft suffered in an individual’s own home, and so on. All these factors/memories that are impressed in the mnemonic circuits of the subject at hand remain simmering and therefore rela-tively with little infl uence of the psychophysical balance of such in-dividual and only if the same are not stimulated by external factors. In the case of sexual assault, the Degree of Virtual Hostility would therefore increase only if “pronounced” advances were made to the subject under discussion by strangers or even worse, by relatives; in the case of personally witnessing an homicide, for example, the De-gree of Virtual Hostility would increase in an exponential way only by seeing a person carrying a hand weapon (even if it was in a rifl e range!); in the case of a memory of theft in the subject’s own home, the Degree of Virtual Hostility would increase each time the subject under discussion may have to decide where to go on holiday…and would even give them up for the fear of having everything stolen from their own home once again.

Concerning the Intensity of race of a Neurogenetic Impulse, the Degree of Hostility is above all linked to political/social factors relat-ing to the country (Nation) taken in consideration and to the climatic conditions of the same.

This is also applied to the Intensity of Species of the Neuroge-netic Impulse.

Conclusions:

When the Intensity of a Neurogenetic Impulse of a single indi-vidual (Iind.NI), falls within the average value relating to the human race it belongs to, the subject under discussion will be able to enjoy a good psychic balance. However, each individual has his own par-ticular biochimic structure (defi ned by his particular genome which differentiates it from the other six billion individuals of his own spe-cies) and his own particular neuronal functioning (which would not


171

be appropriate to defi ne as the level of intelligence) that in a complex game of interactions, determine the potentiality of his neurogenetic impulses and therefore the value of the Average Potentiality of Neu-rogenetic Impulse [(P0 + P1 + P2 + ...Pn) : np ] relating to his psyche.

When the value of the Average Potentiality of a Neurogenetic Im-pulse of an individual exceeds the average value related to the human race it belongs to (previously defi ned with the symbol αp, or such individual fi nds himself living in an environment in which the Degree of Hostility exceeds the average acceptable values for a determined psychic balance, or (in the worse of cases) these two factors both have simultaneous and constant values that are more or less high, we obtain a value of the Individual Intensity of a Neurogenetic Impulse which is just as high; this means that the subject under discussion will surely suffer from determined psychological problems.

When the Individual Intensity of a Neurogenetic Impulse reaches extremely high values, such psychological problems occur and are rather intense making the subject lose touch with the physical reality, therefore making him perform acts of folly or rather irrational; acts that are commonly associated with the group of psychological prob-lems defi ned as: functional psychosis (which include schizophrenia, paranoia and manicdepressive psychosis).

The Index of Extinguibility of any species is due to the number of his voluntary and involuntary errors and by the Intensity of the Species of the Neurogenetic Impulse. Such index is obtained with the following mathematic expression:

IEST-SPEC =

[(αp1 . HDEG1) + ...(αpn + HDEGn )].[(P-E-S-T’s CLevel) . (1+IM)] _____________________________________________________ (kE)2 . nrac,

Note that:In this case, I have substituted the evolutionary factor (EvF) of

equation 1.3 from the previous chapter with the Evolutionary Constant (kE), reaching as denominator the product of (EvF).kE= (kE)2


172

The other side of Time

Time travels in divers paces with divers persons. I ’ll tell you who Time ambles withal, who Time trots withal, who Time gallops withal,

and who he stands still withal.”WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE

In this brief paragraph, I would like to present some sort of “Bio-logic Relativity”, in which the strict relationship uniting the factor of time with the “Degree of Useful Information” relating to each human being of any animal species (including mankind) shall be analyzed.

First of all, I will start by claiming that: “The perception of the passing of time, varies from animal to animal depending on its own extension (dimensions) within space, upon its own interactions with matter (and therefore with all its respective molecular states) which surround it and principally depending on the volume of his brain”.

Any animal, principally during its waking hours, receives from its surrounding environment, a certain number of information (or sensorial impulses) depending on its own fi ve senses (sight, hearing, touch, smell and taste). These fi ve senses are defi ned by different parametres of sensorial information that vary from animal species to animal species and even between animals of the same species. The parameters of information related to the senses can vary depend-ing on the interactions that take place between the animal under discussion and the matter of its surrounding environment (for ex-ample the parameter of visual information relating to a fi sh could never be compared to one living outside water, together with other sensorial parameters) and depending on its own dimensions within any given space. (The humidity relating the air, for example, and on


173

other animal species of more or less “remarkable” dimensions, has a minimal infl uence if not none at all on the parameters of senso-rial information; on a fl y or any other insect of small dimensions, the same acquires a remarkable infl uence upon their sensorial in-formation parameters, because in this case, water fumes can impose themselves with determination in the lives of such insects that are so close to the microscopic world). All these parameters of sensorial information however (in the teeth of all vivisectors), do not depend on the volume of the brain of the animal taken into consideration. The parameters of sensorial, auditive, visual, tactile, olfactory and gustative information related to the animal species which is being examined, will therefore, for the purpose of convenience, be defi ned by a single parameter which we shall call “Coeffi cient of sensorial information” σ (belonging to each animal species and defi ned, for example, with the average value of the fi ve sensorial parameters). At this point, we could defi ne the following equation:

Eq.3.0:

σ . IS(v,a,t,o,g) = IA__________ ___ sec. sec.

Where “σ “ is the Coeffi cient of Sensorial Information, IS rep-resents the number of apparent sensorial information or sensorial impulses (visual,auditory, tactile, olfactory and gustative) and IA the number of absolute sensorial information. The Degree of Useful Information related to each animal species, will therefore be defi ned by the equation:

Eq.3.1:

DUI = (IA / sec.) : (Vc . v)

Where (IA / sec.) is the absolute number of information which the brain receives in a second (able to be elaborated and not able to


174

be elaborated), Vc is the volume number of the animal’s brain and v is the speed of elaboration of information expressed in “Absolute Information which can be elaborated” in one second. From the latest equation, we note that with the increasing of volume of the brain and its speed of elaboration of sensorial impulses, the Degree of Useful Information tends to decrease; this means that with the increase of its intelligence, there is a tendency to lose a high number of senso-rial information. Such loss therefore leads to an ever increasingly abstract contact between the animal under discussion and the en-vironment it lives in (can you recall F. Capra’s words regarding the negative aspects of our intelligence? Well, it seems to me that this theory presents several analogies with what he expressed with few but essential phrases). You could now ask yourselves “ What does the time factor have to do with all this?” Well, the temporal percep-tion, which is the perception that each animal has of the “passing of time”, varies from animal to animal depending on its own “Degree of Useful Information”.

For example, for a human being whose Degree of Useful Infor-mation is relatively low, time will run much slowly compared with the time that could be perceived by a mouse in its brief frantic style whose brain is literally invaded by millions or even billions of senso-rial information. The intensity of the life of an animal is therefore defi ned by the Degree of Useful Information it has available. At this point, we could therefore defi ne a “Biologic Time”, defi ned by the time factor and the Degree of Useful Information of the animal under discussion, according to the following equation:

Eq.3.2:

TBIO = t : DUI Where TBIO is the “Biologic Time” and t is the time we are used to

determine with simple mechanical or electrical watches. Each animal in this earth will therefore have its own biologic time, more precisely its average life span, depending on its own Coeffi cient of sensorial information σ, of its own number of sensorial impulses (which may be or may not be elaborated) taking into account what its brain


175

receives on average in a second during its waking hours, the volume of its brain and speed of the elaboration of information in its brain and fi nally depending on our perception of time which is: upon the temporal perception of the observator (these have not been taken into account in the equations in order not to make things too com-plicated).

Let’s now think about the speed in which fl ies, ants, bees, butter-fl ies and several other insects living on this enchanting blue planet, reach with their own movements. Have you ever asked yourselves how many “ “tiny steps” an ant makes to cross your balcony in the timeframe of ten seconds? Hundreds of them!

Now, how many steps do you believe a man could make in the timeframe of ten seconds? Perhaps one hundred, two hundred? Well, certainly not…perhaps ten, maximum fi fteen or sixty, if we really want him to run. Have you ever asked yourselves how many times a fl ying butterfl y fl utters its wings within the timeframe of ten sec-onds?

Or how about how many times a bee or ladybird fl utters its wings?

All these examples or observations are useful to make you under-stand that the reality in which insects live is really different from the one mankind lives in. If such living beings that are so endlessly small compared to us, are able to move at such high speeds, it is because they live in another dimension, in another reality. Two minutes spent in our reality to them would probably equal to one hundred minutes of hour time! (if not more). Have you ever wondered why the life of an insect is so brief ? Well you could probably fi nd the answer your-selves if you revise the last equation on Biologic Time.

Each time we observe a fl ying bee or butterfl y or if we observe the rapid and nervous movement of a working ant, we glance upon a reality which does not belong to us. If a man suddenly found him-self “miniaturized” therefore just two millimetres tall, the following would likely happen: fi rst of all, if there were people standing next to him, he would see such “super-giant” people move with extremely slow movements. In front of a switched on tv, the images of a cartoon would, for instance, appear at a rather slow sequence, he would see each fi lm photogram! This man would perhaps live for just three


176

years, if observed by our reality; but he would anyhow die because in his reality, forty of our years would already have passed! (In your opinion, why is it so diffi cult to catch fl ies?).

“We have been educated to consider the absolute Newtonian time as the only valid measure in an objective and rational world.

We measure our reality with our kitchen clock and for this reason we are astonished at the speed of a mouse and feel boredom when

look at the slowness of the hippo. But both live according to the right rhythm of their own biologic clock. Small mammals die early but

live at an accellerated rythm and burn rapidly; great mammals live longer but slowly. If we take into consideration their biologic clock,

mammals of different dimensions tend to live the same amount of time ”.

STEPHEN JAY GOULD

“ Bees are not as busy as we believe. It is only the fact that they are unable to buzz slowly”.

KIN HUBBARD


177

Astronomy, brief chronologic history

“Sooner or later, each dogma must die out”HERBERT GEORGE WELLS

“Each great movement knows three phases: fi rst it is laughed at, then discussed and fi nally adopted”

JOHN STUART MILL,1806-1873

For approximately two thousand years, people believed in the Ar-istotelian cosmology, according to which the sun, planets, the moon and stars were fi xed within eight christalline spheres that rotated around the earth. They were considered to be sphres constituted by the sky, a perfect substance which could neither be changed nor destroyed . Matter was solely composed by earth, water, air and fi re and the earth was found in the middle of the universe.

With Copernico’s masterpiece on the “Revolution of celestial spheres” (pubblished in 1543, just before his death), the foundation of Aristotelian Cosmology collapsed. According to Copernico, the earth wasn’t the centre of the universe but rather the sun, around which the earth and other planets orbited. This is how the Coper-nican era started, cosmology which was later supported by Galileo Galilei, who discovered the phases of Venus and on the basis of these established that such planet rotates around the sun and not around the earth, as claimed by the Tolemaic-Aristotelian doctrine. With the “Dialogue concerning the maximum systems” (1632), Galileo forever demolished the Tolemaic system.

Galileo’s greatest glory is deeply rooted in his method of research


178

which was enunciated as phylosopher and acted as scientist thus casting the basis of the modern scientifi c thought. The conception of a limited and static universe as seen by Aristotele, Copernico and Galileo, was defi nitely substituted with the one of an endless and static universe in 1687, with Newton’s fundamental work: “Philos-ophiae naturalis principia mathematica”, in which the great English physicist and mathematician shares the merit of having set the basics of mechanics with Galileo.

Towards the beginning of the twentieth century (1915) Albert Einstein modifi ed, with his theories of General Relativity, Newton’s gravity connecting what he defi ned as mass-energy to space-time. Such “force of gravity” which according to Newton acted between stars and planets, was defi ned by Einstein as the effect of mass on the geometry of space; whereas he merged together the principles of in-ertia and the laws of gravity through a curved space-time concept.

In spite of the fact that his equations led him to think about a dynamic universe, Einstein constantly remained linked to the concep-tion of a static universe. Between 1924 e il 1929, measurements car-ried out by American astronomer Edwin Hubble, demonstrated that the spectral lines of more distant galaxies presented a move towards the red (attributed to the Doppler effect) and therefore came to the conclusion that galaxies moved away from each other; in other terms, it led to the conception of an expanding universe. Einstein therefore had to believe once again in the static nature of the universe, fully accepting its equations and admitting to have committed: “The big-gest mistake of his life”.

After having reigned for over eighty years, General Relativity is a subject of discussion amongst a few scientists who further to cur-rent experiments, are contemplating whether to look at it again and perhaps add more touches to it. By studying the binary systems of neutron stars (binary pulsars), scientists are hoping to claim to fi nd the validity of the theory of General Relativity, of which basics actu-ally lie in the gravitational description of the Universe. One of such researchers, Thibault Damour, physicist and Professor at the Institut des hautes études scientifi ques, claims that bodies do not fall in a gravitational fi eld in the same way or, in other words, that the fall depends on their mass and their nature denying that the inertial mass


179

and gravitational mass are the same and claiming that until now no one had ever been able to notice because on the earth, the variation of gravitational constant is just too small to be measured

When neutron stars form a binary system, fundamental condi-tions able to observe the effects related to the non linear part of Einstein’s equation, which permanently encloses all the complexity of the same equations are fully satisfi ed. By sistematically recording radio emissions of these stars, it has been noticed that their signal, in the course of the years, was subjected to variations of arrival times, thus proving the existence of a disturbance in the system balance.

The theoretical interpretation of such disturbances, is based on the non linear terms of Einstein’s equation. But what about the fu-ture of experimental research? Unfortunately, due to energy which is increasingly more elevated required to accellerate the particles, several physics theories of the 80s are and shall remain for a very long time not possible to be experimentally verifi able (in any case not before theXXII century). One of these theories is the one of the “Great Unifi cation”, which suggests to unite the three powers of quantum pertinence, namely: the strong one, the weak one and the electromagnetic one. But such theory requires such elevated energy in order to be verifi ed (1015 GeV), that until now, even the biggest and most sophisticated pieces of machinery are able to reach. This is without mentioning the “Theory of Everything”, more precisely the one which suggests uniting the four fundamental powers of nature: the three powers of quantum pertinence together with gravity (which acts on a large scale).

Such theory, in order to be verified, requires an energy of 1019 GeV, equal to 1019 billion electronvolt!.*28

“(...) there is a tendency in the science of the 20th century, to forget that there will be a science of the 21st century from which

the views of our knowledge of the universe may appear completely different from our current view: perhaps we are suffering from a

*28 All the information included in the last part which are of a purely scientifi c na-ture, have been extracted from the italian magazine “Science & Life” (gen.’95).


180

provincionalism of a temporary order, some kind of arrogance that has always irritated our posterity”.

JOSEPH ALLEN HYNEK

“Rarely has an important scientifi c innovation paved the way by convincing and gradually converting its own opponents. What

happens is that gradually, the opponents disappear and since its birth, the new generation familiarizes itself with such idea”.

MAX PLANK,1858-1947


181

Vis Vitalis

“If we wish to call soul everything that has perceptions and desirability (...), all the simple or monad substances can therefore be

named as souls”.LEIBNIZ

Unfortunately, science still hasn’t been able to give a clear and complete defi nition to the concept of “life”; what still hasn’t been fi gured out, the reason why specifi c complex forms of energy (stable) give origin to some biologic entities (or it would perhaps be better to say: they appear in the shape of E.B*29), whilst others have not been able to. Well, in this paragraph I will expose such argument, a very brief and purely personal theory therefore completely confuta-ble, which is principally proposing to place under a different focal point and therefore a different outlook, the concept which defi nes the words of “life” and “soul”. I will therefore start by dividing the vari-ous forms of energy existing in nature into three principle typological models, defi ned on the basis of the energy’s characteristics of state that are taken into consideration. We therefore obtain three distinct energetic classes that I have denominated as follows:

a) Primary Energy: it is represented by complex forms of energy (stable) which are inactive and of a more ore less unlimited duration (degradable with diffi culty in nature and of an unlimited duration when atmospheric agents are absent, or rather in space). This class therefore includes bodies which are commonly defi ned as idle.

*29 From now on, E.B, will stand for: Biologic Entity.


182

b) secondary energy: represented by complex forms of energy (stable), active (E.B) and that can remain as such (active), only by continuously absorbing energy and therefore forming a system or cycle of energetic exchange. The time factor in this case, alters the functionality of the’E.B intended as means of energetic exchange. The E.B becomes inactive (which means it no longer absorbs en-ergy) and is easily degradable when it interrupts the energetic cycle confi ned in the nature of the E.B. (cyclus mater) (due to natural or artifi cial causes) or the energetic cycle defi ned by the E.B as well as its surrounding environment (systemic or primary cycle). In popular terms, such phenomenon is in synthesis, defi ned by the word death. The phase of degradation of E.B initially starts with the cessation of the kinetics of the entire entity (obviously if it consists in an E.B belonging to the “animal”’s kingdom. The reason why I have placed the term animal between inverted commas will be understood later when you will discover how subtle and diffi cult it is to defi ne, when analyzing the characteristics of microscopic entities, the boundaries between the animal kingdom and the vegetable kingdom), and then with the gradual cessation of activity of energetic exchange of all elements (organic molecules) which constitute it.

c) Tertiary energy: it is represented by the heat and other forms of dispersive energy.

Now, the one million dollar question is the following:“Where does the kinetics activity of a biologic entity arise from?”Well, in order to establish this, it is fi rst of all essential to take in

consideration the following aspects of nature, which can be described in physics terms and therefore easily be conceivable: some elements (C,H,O,N; of which the principle element is Carbon, as it is always present in any organic molecule), when combined, they give rise to composts or organic molecules which, depending on the number of elements they are formed with, are denominated binary, ternary or quaternary. Two composts, even if both formed by the same type of elements and have therefore the same coarse formula, can consider-ably differ from each other due to their different structural formula (such phenomenon is known as structural Isometry and is due to a different union of atoms) or due to a different position occupied by some atom or group of atoms (positional isometry). Any organic


183

molecule, in order to “survive” must constantly absorb energy from its surrounding environment before it can newly place it in such envi-ronment in the form of heat, and with others processes that everyone knows.

During such phase or energetic cycle, the molecule at issue presents endlessly small oscillations (kinetic activity) due to the constant energetic exchange between the same molecule and its sur-rounding environment. Any organic molecule (or biologic entity) is therefore conceivable as a means of energetic exchange. (In reality, all composts of inorganic nature are constituted by atoms that are in constant vibration and could therefore also be conceived as means of energetic exchange. However, even a combination between them in infi nite schemes, will always have a potentiality of energetic exchange which is extremely low and therefore will never be able to manifest not even the most measly kinetic activity). With such viewpoint, it is therefore essential to consider carbon as an element endowed with a high PEE (Potentiality of Energetic Exchange). Such element when combined with other elements (H,O,N) will most probably also be endowed with some form of PEE, considerably increases its PEE by giving origin to the phenomenon of kinetic activity (oscillations) that are more or less imperceptible thus, organic molecules. The PEE of organic molecules , increases in an exponential way when the latest are combined together and form organic composts constituted by millions of molecules.

The following enigma now still remains: why do some “millions” of organic molecules give rise, for example, to a bacterium (more precisely to a self-organizing biologic entity) while other “millions” of molecules give rise to common vegetable cells?

Well, an answer to this could be the following: when the PEE of a determined organic compost increases above all limits, it triggers off such an elevated kinetic activity that it is able to provoke internally some kind of reaction in which all molecular circuits (defi ned by determined chemical reactions of element decomposition), they join according to well-defi ned schemes and therefore give rise to some sort of “intelligence” whose purpose is to coordinate the kinetic ac-tivity of the entire organic compost in order to obtain a determined


184

model of self-organizational energy leading to the lowest waste of energy.

So this is perhaps how bacteria and other biologic “thinking” entities are created: this perhaps how animal life is born. One thing manking can certainly be proud of is to be the most complex means of energetic exchange present on the earth.

Note:A very interesting thorough examination of this theory, has been

reported on Internet,with a long article at:http://pesanervi.diodati.org/pn/?a=342


185

Bibliography

Pollak Robert, “Signs of Life. The Language and Meanings of DNA”, Houghton Miffl in Company, 1994.Barrow, J. D. “Theories of Everything” (The Quest for Ultimate Ex-planation), Oxford University Press,1991.Capra Fritjof, “The Tao of Physics”, 1975.Capra Fritjof, “The Turning Point”, Simon & Schuster, 1982.Capra Fritjof, “The Web of Life”, Doubleday - Anchor Book, 1996Frank J.Tipler, “The physics of Immortality”.John d.Barrow – Frank J.Tipler, “The Anthropic Cosmological Prin-ciple”.Ken Wilber,” The Spectrum of Consciousness”.Jenny Randless,”Time Storms”.Ilya Prigogine – Isabelle Stengers, « Entre le temps et l’éternité », Librairie Arthème Fayard,Paris,1988.Barrow J.D. ”Impossibility,The limits of Science and the Science of Limits”,Oxford University Press,1998.Richard Dawkins,”The Selfish Gene”,Oxford University Press,1976.J.P.Briggs,F.David Peat,”Looking Glass Universe”, Simon & Schuster,New York,1984.Robert H.Hopcke,”There are no accidents”,Riverhead Books,The Putnam Berkley Group,New York,1997.M.Von Franz,“Psyche und Materie”,Daimon Verlag, Einsiedeln,CH,1988.


186

Michael Talbot,”The Olographic Universe”,1991.C.G.Jung,”La sincronicità (1952);Gli archetipi dell’ inconscio collet-tivo (1934/1954)”,Bollati & Boringhieri,Torino (Italy),1998.Hawking S.W. ”A Brief History of Time”,Bantam,New York,1988.Douglas R.Hofstadter & Daniel C.Dennett, “The Mind’s I”, Basic Books, 1981.Grof Stanislav,Psychology of the Future,S.U.N.Y,2000.Willis Christopher, “The Wisdom of the genes”, Basic Books,New York, 1989.Pauwels L. e Bergier Jacques, « Le matin des magiciens » Gallimard, 1960.Ernest Nagel e James R.Newman, “Gödel’s Proof”, New York Uni-versity Press (S.U.N.Y.), 1958.Albert Einstein,“Über die spezielle und allgemeine Relativitäts-the-orie”, 1916.George Smoot, Wrinkles in Time, 1993.Paul Davies, “About Time”, Orion Productions, 1995.David Ruelle, « Hasard et chaos », Ed. Odile Jacob, 1991.Nevill Drury, “Human Potential”, Element Books, 1989.John Taylor, “Black Holes - The End of the Universe?”, 1973.Carl Gustav Jung, “Die Psychologie der unbewussten Prozesse”, 1917.Jean Piaget, “The Man and his Ideas”, 1973.Helena Curtis e N. Sue Barnes, “Invitation to Biology”, Worth Pu-blishers, 1972.Sexl Raab Streeruwitz, “Physik”, Verlag Carl Ueberreuter, 1978.Erwin Schrödinger, “What is Life?”, Cambridge University Press, 1944.Eccles J. C., “Evolution of the Brain, Creation of the Self”, Routledge, 1989.Bertrand Russel, “The scientifi c Outlook”, George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1931.




Technology

The Synchro Energy Project, beyond the Holographic Universe (by Fausto Intilla) - ebook