View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
3.5.12, Keynote I, Main Hall, Chair: The Internet, Science, and Transformations of Knowledge (Ralph Schroeder) #CeDEM12
Citation preview
TITLE
The Internet, Science, and Transformations of Knowledge
Ralph Schroeder Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford
May 3, 2012
Overview
• Definition of e-Research• The sociology of advancing (online) knowledge • Examples and Cases• Implications
Research computing
The Grid
Supercomputing
Clouds
Big Data
Web 2.0
e-Research
Defined as distributed and collaborative digital tools and data for knowledge production
,
Digital transformations of research
Computational Manipulability +
Research Technologies(Mathematization)
Socio-Technical Organization
(Computerization movements)
Research Front(For different fields)
A Model of Transformations
Computational manipulability+ Research technologies+ Socio-technical organization= Transformations of research front
Computational Manipulability?
• ‘the distinctiveness of the network of mathematical practitioners is that they focus their attention on the pure, contentless form of human communicative operations: on the gestures of marking items as equivalent and of ordering them in series, and on the higher-order operations which reflexively investigate the combinations of such operations’
• ‘mathematical rapid-discovery science…the lineage of techniques for manipulating formal symbols representing classes of communicative operations’
Research Technologies and Driving Forces
• Off-the-shelf and special purpose, but ‘all-purpose’ (passport-like) machines across contexts
• A hard core around which researchers can focus attention on a common research front
• Movements (SIMs, Frickel and Gross) to computerize (mathematize?) research (Kling)
• Core (research technologies) plus organization and movements - driving science (and research)
The sociology of advancing (online) knowledge production
• Research instruments plus mathematics -> high-consensus rapid-discovery science
• Orientation to a community of researchers at the research front
• Focus of attention limited by law of small numbers (Collins)
• The extension of computation into research • The limits of understanding and explaining
research-in-the-making……versus a movement that applies across research
Varieties of Research
• Humanities: patterns in words, numbers, images, sounds…
• Social Sciences: statistics, image analysis, mapping…• Sciences: Hacking’s ‘styles’• Mathematization, now Cloudified• All knowledge is digitally manipublable in e-
Research…• …but relation of the object to the (physical) world or
to the research front varies
Examples and Cases
– GAIN = statistical data pooling– Galaxyzoo = taxonomic crowdsourcing– Integrative Biology = modelling– EGEE/LHC = observation and measurement– SPLASH = taxonomic– Swedish National Data Service = statistical, combined data– SwissBioGrid = statistical/modelling– VOSON = statistical, network analysis– PynchonWiki = interpretive crowdsourcing – Cultural genomics with Google Books = statistical/interpretive– Moretti = distance reading via network analysis
...what type of transformation?
GAIN:
Genetic Association
Information Network
IB:
Integrative Biology
Source: CERN, CERN-EX-0712023, http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1203203
Particle Physics and EGEE: The world’s largest e-Science collaboration
SPLASH: Structure of Populations, Levels of Abundance, and Status of Humpbacks
Meyer, E.T. (2009). Moving from small science to big science: Social and organizational impediments to large scale data sharing. In Jankowski, N. (Ed.), E-Research: Transformation in Scholarly Practice (Routledge Advances in Research Methods series). New York: Routledge.
e-Research in Sweden• Sweden has a major e-Research initiative• ’Universal’ personal identification• Uniquely powerful datasets (e.g. twin registry)• Significance: If Swedes can’t do it, no one can? • Use of population data in a ’transparent’ society with high trust between
people, authorities and researchers…• …but, implementation of secure distributed access and ’incidents’ creating
public concerns
• Swedish National Data Service
VOSON (NodeXL version)Ackland, R. (2010), "WWW Hyperlink Networks," Chapter 12 in D. Hansen, B. Shneiderman and M. Smith (eds), Analyzing Social
Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Morgan-Kaufmann.
Fig. 1 Culturomic analyses study millions of books at once.
J Michel et al. Science 2011;331:176-182
Published by AAAS
Source: Moretti, F. (2011). Network Theory, Plot Analysis. New Left Review 68, p. 81
Source: Meyer, E.T., Schroeder, R. (2009). Untangling the Web of e-Research: Towards a Sociology of Online Knowledge. Journal of Informetrics 3(3):246-260
Source: Meyer & Schroeder (2009). The World Wide Web of Research and Access to Knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management Research and Practice 7 (3):218-233.
iTunes UGoogle CitationsMicrosoft Academic SearchTwitterYouTube…
What difference does it make?
– A physical core network of digital tools and data (computational manipulability)
– A research community focuses its efforts– The expandable (‘clouds’) capacity of research
instruments + new organizational modes = ongoing diffusion of e-Research across domains
– Limits of this spread = limits of attention on new fronts towards which there are orientations: ‘advances’ versus existing directions
Changing Research Practices• Communication: searchability/findability, and
(pressure for) increased reflexivity• Role of Knowledge in society: boundaries vis-a-vis
public and between research communities becomes more porous
• Knowledge: driven towards computational manipulability and aggregatability
• The confluence of these three: Research becomes an increasingly autonomized apparatus in society and a complexified socio-technical one
Implications• Implications for Science Communication:
– Reflexivity changes practices, and the role of knowledge vis-à-vis public
• Implications for STS, information science and other fields: – synthesis beyond existing (sub) disciplinary boundaries is
needed• Implications for policy and practice:
– awareness of positive and negative aspects of autonomization (or intermediation and disintermediation of knowledge)
– changing boundaries within knowledge, and between knowledge and society
Oxford e-Social Science Project
OxfordInternetInstitute
Oxforde-Research
Centre
Institute for Science, Innovation
and Society at
Saïd Business School
http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/microsites/oess/