17
THE FUTURE OF GEOCODED ADDRESSING IN AUSTRALIA Maurits van der Vlugt Mercury Project Solutions With: Mark Watt, Business Aspect Kylie Armstrong, CRC-SI

The Future of Geocoded Addressing in Australia

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Future of Geocoded Addressing in Australia

THE FUTURE OF

GEOCODED ADDRESSING

IN AUSTRALIA

Maurits van der Vlugt

Mercury Project Solutions

With:

Mark Watt, Business Aspect

Kylie Armstrong, CRC-SI

Page 2: The Future of Geocoded Addressing in Australia

Meet Fred & Gabrielle

Page 3: The Future of Geocoded Addressing in Australia

Street Addressing – is it good enough?

Evolved over 40

years

Property-based

Culminating in G-

NAF, does an ‘OK’

job

Page 4: The Future of Geocoded Addressing in Australia

Evolving Requirements

Enable Point-to-Point navigation, including indoor & 3D

Greater resolution & coverage than property addresses

Trusted

Easily Communicated

Timely Updates

Ubiquitously Available (underpinning the Digital Economy)

Page 5: The Future of Geocoded Addressing in Australia

1-20/99-115 Flinders

St.

Post & Frontage for

lots 1-20

99 Flinders St.

Post & Frontage

for lot 21

115 Flinders St.

Post & Frontage

for lot 23

1-3/18 Hutchinson St.

Post & Frontage lots 22 &

24

Goods delivery for lots 1-

20

Hutchinson

Place (no

number)

Car Park access

for Lots 1-23

99-115

Flinders St,

SP 48654

https://www.facebook

.com/suzieqcoffee

(lot 24)

‘Traditional’ (G-NAF) vs. reality

Page 6: The Future of Geocoded Addressing in Australia

G-NAF: How we

think it works

Source: Business Aspect (2014)

Page 7: The Future of Geocoded Addressing in Australia

How the public think it works

Page 8: The Future of Geocoded Addressing in Australia

How it really

works

Source: Business Aspect (2014)

Page 9: The Future of Geocoded Addressing in Australia

Systemic Issues with G-NAF

Cost-inefficient

Duplication of effort, inconsistencies, and

ambiguities

Doesn’t support emerging requirements and

use-cases

Structurally unable to provide required currency levels

Non property-based locations

Impossible or cumbersome for citizen updates

Page 10: The Future of Geocoded Addressing in Australia

“Location” or

“Address”?

3/18 Hutchinson

Street

https://www.face

book.com/suzieq

coffee

-33.884891,

151.217647

http://w3w.co/h

andy.keys.edit

Page 11: The Future of Geocoded Addressing in Australia

By the year 2020…

Communicating Location, not just Addresses

Using descriptive labels of a place in 3D Space & Time

Captured, Maintained and Shared by the Community

Confidence in the data comes from transparency and

provenance.

Government’s role is that of a facilitator, not a creator

Page 12: The Future of Geocoded Addressing in Australia
Page 13: The Future of Geocoded Addressing in Australia

Disruptive Approach….

Technology

Standards-based & vendor

agnostic

Federated

Open Web Service APIs

Role of Government

Facilitate and Enable

Minimal Required

Infrastructure

Intervene where there is

Market Failure

People

Crowd-sourced content and

updates

Data

Transparent

High-Resolution

Beyond Properties only

Page 14: The Future of Geocoded Addressing in Australia

A Series of (Collaborative) Experiments

Page 15: The Future of Geocoded Addressing in Australia

Blue Sky?

Page 16: The Future of Geocoded Addressing in Australia

Summary

G-NAF is a great achievement!

Struggles to meet 21st century requirements

Timeliness

Resolution

Citizen updates

Systemic Issues require disruptive approach

Build on G-NAF

Crowd Source content

Leverage emerging innovations (e.g. AddEx, What3Words, Geepers, ….)

Page 17: The Future of Geocoded Addressing in Australia

Thank you

Based on CRC-SI Research Project 3.10 “Geocoded Addressing

Optimisation”

In collaboration with:

Department of Communications

Business Aspect

1Spatial

More information

[email protected]

http://bit.do/GeocodedAddressing