93
Challenges Panel discussions Session 1 Moderator: Eneas Hunguana 2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Challenges 1

Stockholm Summary

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentaciones de las conclusiones del Stockholm Challenge del año 2008

Citation preview

Page 1: Stockholm Summary

Challenges

Panel discussions Session 1

Moderator: Eneas Hunguana

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Challenges 1

Page 2: Stockholm Summary

Panel

•  P. Krishna Reddy, Economic Development •  Hugh McGuire, Culture •  Sven Mauléon, Environment •  Joel Selanikio, Health •  Andres Casco, Public Administration •  Frank Starmer, Education

2008-05-21 2 Panel discussions: Challenges

Page 3: Stockholm Summary

Economic Development

P. Krishna Reddy eSagu Project

IIIT, Hyderabad, India

2008-05-21 3 Panel discussions: Challenges

Page 4: Stockholm Summary

Challenges (1)

•  Power –  Availability and Quality

•  Connectivity –  Internet Service Providers –  Mobile Connectivity Problems

•  Sustainability –  Difficult to sustain on single service –  Development of sustainable business with out external support

•  High service cost •  Policy/Government/Micro-Management Issues

–  Non existent policies –  Non-supportive policies

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Challenges 4

Page 5: Stockholm Summary

Challenges (2)

•  Software licenses /IPRs – Software licenses are expensive for small

scale projects

•  Logistics – Tracking of materials

•  Creating wealth •  Getting government/public Support

– Old habits or ideologies

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Challenges 5

Page 6: Stockholm Summary

Culture

Hugh McGuire LibriVox.org

Canada

2008-05-21 6 Panel discussions: Challenges

Page 7: Stockholm Summary

Challenges

•  Creating with technology. •  Building community through creation. •  Successfully building community might

answer many of your challenges.

2008-05-21 7 Panel discussions: Challenges

Page 8: Stockholm Summary

Environment

Sven Mauléon OpenmindProjects

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Challenges 8

Page 9: Stockholm Summary

Challenges

•  Integrated approaches: environment, health, social, economic, education

•  Integrated partnerships •  Motivation and awareness •  Execution

–  encouraging immediate action, go from talk to walk •  Communication

–  overcoming cultural, language, and geographic barriers

2008-05-21 9 Panel discussions: Challenges

Page 10: Stockholm Summary

Challenges

•  Communicating with local communities across language, cultural, and literacy barriers

•  Establishing trust between “us” and local communities

•  Scaling up without losing quality/replication of successful projects

2008-05-21 10 Panel discussions: Challenges

Page 11: Stockholm Summary

Health

Dr. Joel Selanikio EpiSurveyor Project

Washington, D.C. United States

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Challenges 11

Page 12: Stockholm Summary

Identification of a problem

•  Not enough public health information in developing countries

•  Most data comes from surveys •  Surveys done on paper (no computers)

2008-05-21 12 Panel discussions: Challenges

Page 13: Stockholm Summary

First Iteration: use computers

•  Handheld computers (PDAs) best suited to environment

•  Commercial software available

2008-05-21 13 Panel discussions: Challenges

Page 14: Stockholm Summary

Challenges of 1st Iteration

•  Scalability – Cost of hardware (PDAs) – Cost of commercial software – Complexity of commercial software requires

expensive consultants

2008-05-21 14 Panel discussions: Challenges

Page 15: Stockholm Summary

Second and Third Iteration

•  2nd: EpiSurveyor on PDAs – Free, open-source instead of commercial

software – Very easy to use

•  3rd: EpiSurveyor on mobiles – Use mobile phones instead of (or in addition

to) PDAs – Removes hardware cost

2008-05-21 15 Panel discussions: Challenges

Page 16: Stockholm Summary

Current challenges

•  Long-term sustainability – Currently grant-supported – Developing fee- and subscription-based

additional capabilities – Open-source means many groups can add

resources

2008-05-21 16 Panel discussions: Challenges

Page 17: Stockholm Summary

Public Administration

Andres Casco SAE On Line Auctions

Mexico

2008-05-21 17 Panel discussions: Challenges

Page 18: Stockholm Summary

Challenges

•  Social Engagement –  Digital Inclusion for Everyone (economic, social, gender). –  Familiarity with ICT ( training and education ) –  Trust and Confidence –  To use ICT for dialogue between public and the government. Need for feedback systems so that

people can reach governments or NGOs etc •   Citizen-Centric Approach

–  Most of public administration projects lack citizen centric approach. Projects are based on offer/leaders interests not on public demand/interest.

•   Institutional Leadership –  Lack of e-leaders (Political champions) to support the systems. –  Need for integrated Government on ICT

•  Remove duplication of systems that are doing the same tasks from different government agencies. –  Need for creation of awareness on ICT systems –  Need for training on the side of public staff on use of ICT systems.

•   Technology –  Need for technology to support all the languages of a region (e.g India).

•   Legal Framework –  Challenge of Legal framework for providing ICT services 

2008-05-21 18 Panel discussions: Challenges

Page 19: Stockholm Summary

Education

Frank Starmer Multilingual Systems for Literacy

and Education

2008-05-21 19 Panel discussions: Challenges

Page 20: Stockholm Summary

Project Reach

•  Mass –  Opportunity for large impact –  Likelihood of igniting curiosity among many learners

•  Small Groups –  Personalized –  Interacting with “problem” groups

(outside society mainstream) ‏–  Rapid adaptation to changing needs

•  Unreached beneficiaries –  Minimal to no Internet access –  Difficult to attract enablers

2008-05-21 20 Panel discussions: Challenges

Page 21: Stockholm Summary

ICT: Education or Learning?

•  Traditional education focuses on content mastery: a just-in-case paradigm. –  Readily accepted evaluation tools –  Suited to mainstream learners –  Infrequently used content subject to the forgetting

process •  Internet-centric and problem-based learning

–  Problem solving leads to just-in-time learning –  New skill: harvesting Internet accessible resources –  Reduces impact of the forgetting process

2008-05-21 21 Panel discussions: Challenges

Page 22: Stockholm Summary

ICT Arenas

•  Cognitive: shifting learning paradigm –  ICT complements formal instruction –  ICT potential to incorporate family members

into the learning environment – New generation of contributors to national

priorities •  Social:

– Misunderstanding of ICT: Not limited to business –  ICT focus on improving communication and

language skills

2008-05-21 22 Panel discussions: Challenges

Page 23: Stockholm Summary

A delicate balance

•  Establish an engaging environment •  Balancing learning / social gals vs sustainaibility

in a business setting (no free lunch) ‏•  Balance between global priorities vs local priorities •  Sensitive balance between technology and people

issues (sensitive, forgiving, encouraging)

2008-05-21 23 Panel discussions: Challenges

Page 24: Stockholm Summary

Impact

Panel discussions Session 2

Moderator: Jeanna Högberg

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 24

Page 25: Stockholm Summary

Panel

•  Daniel Rickard, Education •  Alan Young, Health •  James Mudie, Environment •  Mayra Juca, Culture •  Ian Retson, Public Administration •  Edwin Zulu, Economic Development

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 25

Page 26: Stockholm Summary

Education

Daniel Rickard Fire and Ice, Elluminate. Calgary, Alberta. Canada.

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 26

Page 27: Stockholm Summary

How to Measure Success in Education?

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 27

Qualita'vevs.Quan'ta've

Page 28: Stockholm Summary

There Must be a Balance of the Two

•  Qualitative: Capture the Emotional Measurements –  Participants Diaries –  End of Event Questioners –  End User Feedback Forms –  Stories that highlight the impact of the program –  Always share these stories –  Example: Matera Online Newspaper, captures the stories!

•  Quantitative: Capture Numbers and Statistics –  There are 1000’s of ways to do this –  Pick the right items to measure –  Highlight how many people are affected by the change, and

prove it!

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 28

Page 29: Stockholm Summary

Be able to defend the impact of your program

•  Appeal to both the emotional impact and the practical impact of your program

•  Hire an outside expert organization to do the impact study for you – WIMPS did this last year

•  Using the document to get additional funding •  The document made them a better organization

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 29

Page 30: Stockholm Summary

Is the project sustainable?

•  Example from Rafi.ki –  The online community project started to

take on a life of it’s own! –  It grows beyond the original vision

•  Example from Wara Bilong Life –  Students are having so much fun, they don’t

know they are learning! They want to keep playing!

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 30

Page 31: Stockholm Summary

Measure Success Based on a Single Simple Question

If you left, would the project continue without you? People Vote with their feet!

If yes, then we suggest you have attained one level of success

If no, then there may be more work to do

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 31

Page 32: Stockholm Summary

2008-05-21 32

Page 33: Stockholm Summary

Health

Alan Young e-Care Elderly Home Management System

Hong Kong

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 33

Page 34: Stockholm Summary

Three cases

•  EduCare – Providing mobile learning content to train and help patients in using their medical device to better manage their medical condition.

•  Mindyourmind.ca is an international interactive website for youth struggling with mental health issues and provide resources for youth to help themselves and their peers.

•  e-Care Elderly Home Management System is a web-based system serving elderly centers in Hong Kong.

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 34

Page 35: Stockholm Summary

Impact on the patients

•  Improve patients’ accessibility •  Satisfaction •  Safety •  Information accuracy •  Reduce resources (e.g. visit to the

healthcare hence reduce cost)

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 35

Page 36: Stockholm Summary

Impact on Healthcare provider

•  Improve decision making •  Continue professional development •  Improve methodology •  Improve effectiveness and efficiency

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 36

Page 37: Stockholm Summary

Impact on the society

•  Transparency •  Control diseases •  Paradigm Shift •  Promote healthy lifestyle •  Government awareness

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 37

Page 38: Stockholm Summary

Environment

James Mudie Indigenous Peoples Mapping Project

Congo

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 38

Page 39: Stockholm Summary

Impact

•  Awareness •  Replication of successful initiatives - for protection and conservation of the

environment •  Integrated approaches •  Transparency - truth, honesty in public relations.

Open and inclusive solutions

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 39

Page 40: Stockholm Summary

Impact

•  To see parents wanting their children to be educated

•  Too see children motivated to learn •  Selling community products - shea butter (link) •  Mapping of indigenous people’s resources

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 40

Page 41: Stockholm Summary

Culture

Mayra Juca Websites Communidad Segura & Vivba Favela

Brazil

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 41

Page 42: Stockholm Summary

Examples

•  Kokbok à la Blakulla – (cookbook) – making a cookbook builds neighbours &

connections

•  VivaFavela – (youth community media) discovering

citizenship by being correspondents

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 42

Page 43: Stockholm Summary

2008-05-21 43 Panel discussions: Impact

Page 44: Stockholm Summary

2008-05-21 44 Panel discussions: Impact

Page 45: Stockholm Summary

2008-05-21 45 Panel discussions: Impact

Page 46: Stockholm Summary

Public Administration

Ian Retson Leicestershire CareOnLine

Leicestershire, U.K.

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 46

Page 47: Stockholm Summary

Public Administration: Impact

Impact to Citizens/Businesses   Reduced transaction cost   Citizens gain access to information   Improved quality of life   Giving access to people 24x7 at home instead of 9 to 5 office hours   ICT services gives access to minority groups e.g. gender

Impact to Government   Simplification, unification and standardisation to provide services (e.g. in

Singapore charity portal)   Driving change of the government system; but not change for change sake

Impact to ICT Industry   Best technological practise Transfer across borders.

Negative Impact   how to we deal with unemployment that is created by the use of ICT

systems. Measurement

  Measuring the impact from the different dimensions, socially and quantitative

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 47

Page 48: Stockholm Summary

ATouchScreenhelpsBillytousethecomputeronhisown

2008-05-21 48 Panel discussions: Impact

Page 49: Stockholm Summary

MuktaislearningEnglishwiththehelpofthecomputer

2008-05-21 49 Panel discussions: Impact

Page 50: Stockholm Summary

Patriciaimprovesherdexterityandlanguageskillsonthecomputer

2008-05-21 50 Panel discussions: Impact

Page 51: Stockholm Summary

Georgewaslonelyandisolated

2008-05-21 51 Panel discussions: Impact

Page 52: Stockholm Summary

Peteroperateshiscomputerwithjusthisvoice

2008-05-21 52 Panel discussions: Impact

Page 53: Stockholm Summary

Economic Development

Edwin Zulu COMESA SME Toolkit

Zambia

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 53

Page 54: Stockholm Summary

1. Policy Ideas and Creation

•  Creation of new licenses and policies based on positive evaluation and results of project implementation

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 54

Page 55: Stockholm Summary

2. Value Chain Enhancement

•  Research and Development •  Design of Products, Services, or Processes •  Production •  Marketing & Sales •  Distribution •  Customer Service

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 55

Page 56: Stockholm Summary

3. Scaling / Replication

•  Increased interaction capability with ICT •  With scaling, we are able to either

present a formidable front that can push to modify existing structures

•  With scaling, it is easy to work around existing oppressive policies

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 56

Page 57: Stockholm Summary

4. Market Transparency

•  Have been able to achieve online transparency as a result of out ICT involvements

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 57

Page 58: Stockholm Summary

5. Challenge to Old Habits

•  We have been able to present our projects as complementary rather than competitive, and that has helped overcome old ideologies

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 58

Page 59: Stockholm Summary

6. Local Specific Knowledge Bank/Availability

•  We have been able to provide comprehensive documentation and information for online sharing

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 59

Page 60: Stockholm Summary

7. Productivity/Efficiency

•  Our projects have increased production, reduced cost, increased process efficiency in service delivery and increased profitability

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Impact 60

Page 61: Stockholm Summary

Partnerships

Panel discussions Session 3

Moderator: Houssam Toufaili

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Partnerships 61

Page 62: Stockholm Summary

Panel

•  Matthew Blumberg, Culture •  Antoine Geissbuhler, Health •  Janine Selendy, Environment •  Sunil Jacob Mathew, Economic Dev. •  Adrian Goh, Public Administration •  Ekaterina Fedotova, Education

2008-05-21 62 Panel discussions: Partnerships

Page 63: Stockholm Summary

Culture

Matthew Blumberg GridRepublic.org

New York City, United States

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Partnerships 63

Page 64: Stockholm Summary

What is Partnership?

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Partnerships 64

Page 65: Stockholm Summary

What is Partnership?

2008-05-21 65 Panel discussions: Partnerships

Page 66: Stockholm Summary

What is Partnership?

2008-05-21 66 Panel discussions: Partnerships

Page 67: Stockholm Summary

Your Most Important Partners

•  Yourself •  Your community of users/volunteers

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Partnerships 67

Page 68: Stockholm Summary

Health

Prof. Antoine Geissbuhler, MD RAFT project Switzerland

2008-05-21 68 Panel discussions: Partnerships

Page 69: Stockholm Summary

Partnerships

•  Monika Krengel, Katriina Lahtinen, Jackson Mukonzo & Antoine Geissbuhler

•  RAFT: supporting care professionals in remote hospitals in 15 countries in Africa –  continuing education, need for appropriate knowledge –  telemedicine, clinical and logistical support

•  A solution to several key challenges –  Sustainability –  Quality of service –  Relevant knowledge –  Scaling up

2008-05-21 69 Panel discussions: Partnerships

Page 70: Stockholm Summary

Sustainability

•  Organizing local partnerships – Focal point, medical coordinator, technical

coordinator

•  In Mali, 2001: a bottom-up approach – « if you go there, you rot there » – difficulty to get institutional anchoring

•  In Mauritania, 2002: a top-down approach –  immediate government support –  limited physician buy-in

2008-05-21 70 Panel discussions: Partnerships

Page 71: Stockholm Summary

Quality of service

•  Developing operational partnerships – to get timely responses – and quality-controlled services

•  Reference center in Bamako, Mali – staffed with junior on-call physicians – supporting virtual communities of experts

2008-05-21 71 Panel discussions: Partnerships

Page 72: Stockholm Summary

Relevant knowledge

•  Understanding the real needs: – nurses are prescribing in a district hospital

•  Knowledge partners: – universities, university hospitals – contents producers (WHO) – end-users – expertise in user-centered design

2008-05-21 72 Panel discussions: Partnerships

Page 73: Stockholm Summary

Scaling up

•  Partnering to maximize synergies •  IT infrastructure

–  international partners with critical mass –  local companies with local presence

•  Software –  using and sharing Open Source Software

•  Communication –  to the public –  the policy makers –  the funding organizations

2008-05-21 73 Panel discussions: Partnerships

Page 74: Stockholm Summary

Environment

Janine Selendy Horizon Solutions Site

United States

2008-05-21 74 Panel discussions: Partnerships

Page 75: Stockholm Summary

Partnerships (1)

•  The most successful organizations have accomplished their goals and objectives thanks to partnerships

•  Examples of partnership – similar organizations – Non-government and government, academic,

local, regional, nation, and international – corporate social responsibility (CSR)

2008-05-21 75 Panel discussions: Partnerships

Page 76: Stockholm Summary

Partnerships (2)

•  Working with volunteers and interns of all ages and backgrounds.

•  Participating in the Stockholm Challenge

Svalbard Global Seed Vault in the Arctic Opens Doors for 100 Million Seeds from 100 Countries

The action we fail to take today might help save the planet for the future

2008-05-21 76 Panel discussions: Partnerships

Page 77: Stockholm Summary

Economic Development

Sunil Jacob Mathew All Blind Orchestra Project

India

2008-05-21 77 Panel discussions: Partnerships

Page 78: Stockholm Summary

Resource pool

•  Sharing: –  Financial –  Ideas –  Human resources

•  Planning strategies •  Information providers •  Looking at models complementing each other •  Technical cooperation •  Sustainable business model •  Using synergies to build model

2008-05-21 78 Panel discussions: Partnerships

Page 79: Stockholm Summary

Public Administration

Adrian Goh CitizenConnect Programme

Singapore

2008-05-21 79 Panel discussions: Partnerships

Page 80: Stockholm Summary

Partnerships

•  E.g. of Partnerships in e-Government –  Technology Providers (Auctions using eBay/Mexico) –  Local Community (Feedback forums/UK) –  Academia (Training for Police/Italy) –  ICT Industry (Industry Engagement/S’pore)

•  Key Drivers for Success –  Buy-in and Ownership of Stakeholders –  Win-win outcomes

•  Structuring the Contractual Relationship –  From transaction based to outcome based (e.g. S’pore)

2008-05-21 80 Panel discussions: Partnerships

Page 81: Stockholm Summary

Public Administration : Partnerships

Examples of Partnerships   Technology Providers (eBay/Mexico)   Local Community (UK)   Academia (Italy)   ICT Industry / Whole of Govt (S’pore)

Page 82: Stockholm Summary

SAE Online Auctions (Mexico)

Page 83: Stockholm Summary

Leicestershire CareOnLine (UK)

Page 84: Stockholm Summary
Page 85: Stockholm Summary

My CPF (Singapore)

Page 86: Stockholm Summary

Public Administration : Partnerships

Key Drivers for Successful Partnerships   Buy-in and Ownership of Stakeholders  Win-win outcomes

Structuring the Contractual Relationship   From transaction based to outcome based

(e.g. NS Portal S’pore)

Page 87: Stockholm Summary

National Servicemen Portal (Singapore)

Page 88: Stockholm Summary

Education

Ekaterina Fedotova Information Dissemination and Equal Access

(IDEA) Project Russia

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Partnerships 88

Page 89: Stockholm Summary

Why partnership?

•  Create scale •  Focus on core competencies •  Bridging resource gaps

- financial - technical - strategic - knowledge - HR

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Partnerships 89

Page 90: Stockholm Summary

Planning

•  Decide type of partner coverage – Global /Local – Multistakeholders – Cross-sectoral collaboration

•  Target the partner – Where to find them – How to create win/win – Ensure common goals

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Partnerships 90

Page 91: Stockholm Summary

Execution

•  Phased implementation – Pilot project / dating –  long-term agreement /marriage

•  Leadership •  Maintaining your organization/project

identity •  Continuous feedback and flexibility

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Partnerships 91

Page 92: Stockholm Summary

Sustainability

•  Creating value / benefits for long-term participation

•  Transparency, accountability, good governance

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Partnerships 92

Page 93: Stockholm Summary

Multistakeholder Partnerships

57 IDEA Centers in Russia 30 of them - partners for over 9 years Why is this partnership successful? - new contacts and

technologies - loyal stakeholders

who deliver professional programs

2008-05-21 Panel discussions: Partnerships 93