39

Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

  • Upload
    sticky

  • View
    597

  • Download
    7

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

In March 2013 EyeTrackShop became Sticky. Sticky was created to address an oversaturated online ad market to do what “viewability” and “in-screen” can’t – show clients if their ads have actually been seen. Sticky offers a dashboard solution measuring Cost-per-View (CPV) defined as the exact number of impressions that are seen per thousand served. Sticky tracks an ad unit across a campaign. Our clients are seeing a 25-40% increase in seen impressions and time spent looking at their brand. 

Campaign tracking for our clients enables them to stop guessing which half of their branding advertising budget is working and which is not. 

Winner of the ARF Great Mind Award for Innovation in March 2013, Sticky is changing the way online branding is being planned, optimized and audited.

Citation preview

Page 1: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013
Page 2: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Frustration in the Digital Wasteland

Jeff BanderPresident, EyeTrackShop /Sticky

Page 3: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Trivia QuestionAdvertising Lore

✦ Can you name the person pictured here?✦ Hints:

– Born in 1838 in Philadelphia– Served as Postmaster General under

Benjamin Harrison– Considered to be the “Father of Modern Advertising”

✦ Answer: John Wanamaker✦ Why does this matter?

– Coined the saying

“Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don't know which half.”

Page 4: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Problems

1. Concerned how to audit their branding campaign

2. Struggled to optimize branding dollars3. Under pressure to use branding dollars wisely

Page 5: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

No Accurate Way to Track Branding OnlineUS Media Spend

$91B(62%)

$55B(38%)

$6B(25%)

$18B (75%)

Total $147B

Online $24B

Branding6% goes Online

Direct Response33% goes Online

Source: http://www.exchangewire.com/blog/2012/09/27/whitepaper-outlook-on-european-display-advertising-trends-by-clipperton-finance/

Page 6: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

ProblemsWhat would lead you to increase

online brand ad spending?

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

68%

56%

38%

DeloitteTMT Predictions 2012

Source: http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_GX/global/industries/technology-media-telecommunications/tmt-predictions-2012/media-2012/97ab068df67a4310VgnVCM1000001a56f00aRCRD.htm

Page 7: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

ProblemsWhat % of All Online Ads Are Seen?

“There are over 4 trillion display ads served per year now. The truth is, however, a huge chunk of them is never seen by any humans.”

The Viewable Impression Sea Change7/25/12

50%$12,000,000,000

Page 8: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Problems – Unsure how to measure branding online

There are no auditing tools for branding today.

✦ CTR levels are rapidly decreasing and have never been a suitable metric to evaluate brand campaigns

✦ Historically, the primary metric used to buy and sell online branding advertising has been the number of delivered impressions (CPM)

Most are in the dark on how to evaluate branding campaigns

Page 9: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Problems

What do you like about this ad?

What percentage of people actually saw

this ad?

75-100%50-75%25-50%

0%

Page 10: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Ineffective ads and ad campaigns get measured and changed, value saved and made

ProblemsBrand campaigns are not trackable

Ad Clicked On

Direct Response

Ads

RecentTransactions:

Ad Served

Results Gathered

Page 11: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

BrandingAds

ProblemsNo Relevant Ways of Measuring Branding Ads

No such system exists for Display Ads today

Ad Served

Results Gathered

Page 12: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

ProblemsDid the Brand Ad Get Seen?

CPVCPM

Cost-per-View

BrandingAds

Ad Served

Results Gathered

AdSeen?

Page 13: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Solving Problems

CPV (Cost-per-View) – More options to optimize your budget

Plan.Optimize.

Evaluate.Audit.

Page 14: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Problems Solved

• Avoid the unknown of not hitting your target market

• Stop guessing how long your ad is seen, or whether it’s seen at at all

• Avoid the pain of knowing half my campaign works, I just don’t know which half

Page 15: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Dashboard SolutionCost-per-View (CPV) is defined as the number of ad impressions that are seen per thousand served.

Sticky delivers CPV per ad unit and campaign

nCPV TG - net cost per view target group per ad unit and campaign

Impact is average time spent on the ad across an entire campaign.

Page 16: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Why

Prevents publishers from squandering market share by allowing them to get ahead of technology.Attract, increase and keep

Prevents agencies from delivering black box results on branding campaigns. Help clients

Prevents advertisers from wasting money on unseen ads, allowing them to optimize for greater ROI

Page 17: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

* * *

Ad Campaign DetailsAdvertiser: xxCampaign period: xxTracking period: xx

# sites: 4# placements: 5Target group: F 18-45

xx 245x70 xx 500x350 xx 980x200 xx 980x120 xx 980x300 $-

$1.00

$2.00

$3.00

$4.00

$5.00

$6.00

$7.00

$0.21 $0.21

$2.14

$4.69

$2.86

$0.54 $0.27

$4.46

$6.01 $5.41

nCPM nCPV TGAvg nCPM Avg nCPV TG

Viewed Impression

s

Target Group Net CPM

Net Cost per View

Net Cost per View - Target

Time viewing

ad

Ad Campaign Tracking

BRIXIES
Can you change the figures in the y axis so that "," is replaced with a decimal point ... 160,0 should read 160.0 and so on. I can't get at these figures. I changed the figures in the diagram
Page 18: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Pantene Campaign Data

• Facebook Standard Ad

• Amelia (980x240)

• Facebook Page Post Ad

• Devote Wallpaper• Bloggfamiljen

(980x300)

KEEP AWAYHigh price – Low

impact

TARGET GOALS Potential value based

on goals

STICKY ADThe sweet spot

Low cost- High Impact

?

CPV

IMPACTLow Medium High

High

Medium

Low

• Elle (980x180)• MSN (989x120)

Ad Campaign InformationAdvertiser: PanteneCampaign period: n/aTracking period: n/a# sites: 6# placements: 7Target group: F 25-49Benchmark filter: Within

campaign

Page 19: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Pantene Campaign Data Pre-Sticky OptimizationCP

V

IMPACTLow Medium High

High

Medium

Low

KEEP AWAYHigh price – Low impact

TARGET GOALS

STICKY ADThe sweet spot

Low cost- High Impact

?

10%

38% 47%

3% 2%

Potential value based on goals

Page 20: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

CPV

IMPACTLow Medium High

High

Medium

Low

Campaign Post-Sticky Optimization

10%

38% 47%

3 % 2 %4%4%

42% 50%

# Verified Impressions

Impact

Same BudgetPerformance Gains 26-32%

+ 32%+ 26%

BeforeAfter

Page 21: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Testimonial

Krister KarjalainenHead of Digital, Procter & Gamble Nordics

"As we spend more money on online I think it is really important that we find new tools that can help us measure and improve our ROI in our media investments and we believe in this partnership with EyeTrackShop (Sticky) will actually help us increase our ROI for our online investments."

Page 22: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Thank You!

Jeff BanderPresident,EyeTrackShop/Sticky

Skype: ephraim.bander613Phone: +917-523-0007

Page 23: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Definitions

VI%: Percentage verified impressions, i.e., the percentage of impressions that are seen

TG%: Reach in target group

CPV: Cost-per-View, the true cost of reaching a 1,000 consumers by verifying the percentage of impressions that are actually seen

gCPV: Gross CPV

nCPV: Net CPV

nCPVTG%: Net CPV in target group

Impact: The average time the ad is seen. Studies show that the longer an ad is seen the stronger the correlation to recall and action

Verified impressions: Calculates the aggregated number of delivered impressions in the campaign that reached a consumers in the target audience

Verified Time with Audience: Calculates the aggregated time “seen” that the brand has accumulated during the campaign period

Page 24: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Dashboard

Page 25: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Dashboard

Page 26: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Dashboard

Page 27: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Dashboard

Page 28: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Dashboard

Page 29: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Dashboard

Page 30: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Dashboard

Page 31: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Dashboard

Page 32: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Dashboard

Page 33: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Dashboard

Page 34: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

• Based in Stockholm, Sticky is the first media technology company providing a platform for ensuring that display ads get seen, developed in partnership with Tobii Technology

• Award-winning concept:

• ARF Great Mind Awards 2013• Next Gen Market Research Innovation Award 2012

• Blue-chip clients: Google, P&G, AOL, IKEA, McDonalds, and Group M

• Offices in New York, San Francisco, Stockholm, London and Shanghai

• Founded in 2009

Company

Page 35: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013
Page 36: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

ConclusionsPerformance Gains & Savings✦ BIGGER BANG: Reallocate resources to better performing ads. Gain more

impressions with higher impact without increasing your budget.✦ CUT COSTS: Cut underperforming ads and reduce costs.✦ OPTIMIZE: Allocate money to the best performing formats, placements,

and sites.✦ MATCH MEDIA PLAN TO MARKETING GOALS: Tailor a media plan that fits

your marketing goals. Create a strong impact in the beginning of your campaign with higher nCPVTG to plant your message, then buy sites with lower nCPVTG to repeat your message.

✦ RIGHT CREATIVE IN THE RIGHT MEDIA: Compare campaigns and identify which creative works best in which formats, placements, and sites for each brand.

Page 37: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Sticky Optimization

Study Data: $160,000 (12.4% of budget) were invested in “keep away ads”

Page 38: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Sticky Optimization

Client Results: +16.9% Verified Impressions, +25.5% Impact

Page 39: Sticky branding optimizing - Ogilvy Great Minds Award winner 2013

Optus AU

Optus AU

Yahoo

Ninemsn

Aust

Yahoo

Yahoo

Snak

kmed

ia

Gizmodo

CBS Inter

active

CBS Inter

active

$- $50

$100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450

$4 $4 $4 $10 $12 $17 $17 $25

$180

$270

$5 $6 $6 $13 $18 $26 $38 $49

$277

$397

nCPV

nCPM

avg. nCPV

avg. nCPV

Ad Campaign DetailsAdvertiser: telecommunication equipmentCampaign period: Jan-Feb 2013Tracking period: Jan-Feb 2013

# sites: 6# placements: 10Target group: xx

Brand Site Placement Dimensions Budget nCPM nCPV Impact VI VTx Yahoo Homepage double side kickOTP 45 000.00$ 17$ 26$ 1 1747059 485x Yahoo Homepage Gutters 160x750 13 500.00$ 4$ 11$ 2 2092500 1163x Yahoo BT>Technology>Mobile Phone - Medium Rectangle300x250 6 300.00$ 12$ 18$ 0.5 346500 48x Ninemsn Aust Skype homepage Masthead spon650x170 7 920.00$ 10$ 13$ 3 594000 495x Gizmodo Site takeover - integrated display with homepage takeoverFireplace, 728x90, 300x600, 300x25012 620.00$ 25$ 49$ 1.5 257448 107x CBS Interactive CNET AU – HPTO – Skin, 2 x MrecCustom, 300x250 20 000.00$ 180$ 277$ 1.5 72222 30x CBS Interactive CNET AU - Phones Front Door Takeover - Skin, 2 x MrecCustom, 300x250 20 000.00$ 270$ 397$ 2 50370 28x Optus AU Optus Zoo.com - Homepage Burst 1 1x1, 300x250 9 000.00$ 4$ 5$ 3.5 1755000 1706x Optus AU Optus Zoo.com - Homepage Burst 2 1x1, 300x250 9 000.00$ 4$ 6$ 2.5 1485000 1031x Snakkmedia Audience Profile Targeting - MOBILE SWITCHERS 320 x 50 18 000.00$ 17$ 38$ 0.5 476471 66Average 16 134.00$ 54.30$ 84.02$ 1.8 887657 516