29
“Standards, Prototypes, and Pilot Projects” Technology and Flexibility in Designing Cultural Heritage Projects in Challenging Contexts Alessandro Califano CDCH 2012 Innsbruck, 4 October, 2012 Satellite Workshop at VL/HCC 2012 – IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human- Centric Computing (30 September – 4 October 2012)

Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This presentation is a slightly enhanced version of the one introducing, on behalf of ICOM Italy, its "Commissione tematica per gli Audiovisivi e le Nuove Tecnologie", and ICOM-AVICOM, CDCH 2012, a Satellite Workshop at VL/HCC 2012 - IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (Innsbruck, Austria, 4 October 2012).

Citation preview

Page 1: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

“Standards, Prototypes, and Pilot Projects”

Technology and Flexibility in Designing Cultural Heritage Projects in

Challenging Contexts

Alessandro Califano

CDCH 2012

Innsbruck, 4 October, 2012

Satellite Workshop at VL/HCC 2012 – IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing

(30 September – 4 October 2012)

Page 2: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Introduction

“This paper, introducing our CDCH workshop at IEEE’s VL/HCC 2012 Symposium, on behalf of ICOM Italy, its Commissione tematica audiovisivi e nuove tecnologie, and ICOM-AVICOM, will try to ask questions – rather than to give answers – related to the issues at stake, focusing on Creative Design for Interdisciplinary Projects in Cultural Heritage.

Let me start this by reading out a brief note describing ‘Fourth Dimension’ (you’ll find the full text at the URL http://www.slideshare.net/califano ), a pilot project developed at the Cultural Heritage Department of Rome, inspired by a museum collection data visualization programme implemented in Rotterdam.”

Page 3: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

“Fourth Dimension”

“…Like city lights, receding”(William Gibson, Neuromancer)

Page 4: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Migrating to a Different Context

“Now, let us imagine to transplant a pilot project like ‘Fourth Dimension’ to a different context, like the one we find in some central Asian regions.

Which would be the results of a SWOT analysis of the project, if set in such a new context?

Let us examine this anti clock-wise, starting by what can help us in achieving the project’s aims, and ending with what can hinder us in doing so.”

Page 5: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

A Different Context…

Page 6: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Fourth Dimension – SWOT Analysis (anti-clockwise)

SWOT analysis diagram in English language, 30 September 2007 (via Xhienne on Wikipedia)

Page 7: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Strengths

• Stable, entertaining, strongly interactive and informing data structure

• Very high data mining and data association potential

Page 8: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Opportunities

• Building a wide knowledge basis

• Building a platform for decision making / resources allocation

• Allowing workflow recognition / fostering work reorganization

Page 9: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Threats

• Significant infrastructural requirements (constant power availability, ITC)

• Uncertain (but probably significant) times / costs for spare parts’ availability

• Direct threat to traditional workflow and work organization

Page 10: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Weaknesses

• Expensive

• Fragile

• Steep learning / training / maintenance curve

Page 11: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Wrapping it up…

We can define this pilot project (like many other hi-tech loaded cultural heritage programmes) as being not very

sustainable, in the new given context.

“In a meeting organized in Bologna (19 May 2011) by ICOM Italy’s Committee for Audiovisual & New Technologies (see next slide), the need was stressed to focus on sustainability and, possibly, on downsizing.

This badly needed trend involves not just architectural solutions, as we will see in a moment, but also requires infrastructures, ITC solutions, and more to be addressed in this context.”

Page 12: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Audiovisual Archives for a “Light” Museum

Notes on a sustainable development model

Alessandro Califano

ICOM Italy - Commissione Tematica Audio-Visivi e Nuove tecnologie

Istituzione Musei del Comune di Bologna

“preserving virtual memories”

Bologna, 19 May 2011

Page 13: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

A Provocative Thought, and 2 Case Studies“We have been building expensive museums, and have to

spend almost as much to try protecting artefacts from light and variations in temperature…”

• The glass-and-concrete art museum in Tashkent – an ineffective fight against summer heat

• The Savitsky Museum (Nukus) and the Archaeological Museum (Termez) – high effectiveness of a vernacular architecture approach

Page 14: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Beyond Architecture - OSACA

OSACA, the Open Source Alliance of Central Asia, was founded at ROSCCA 2011, the first Regional Open Source Conference for Central Asia (Kabul, 15-18 October 2011).

It focuses on FOSS (Free and Open Source Software), and on its advocacy and dissemination, in order to facilitate cultural, social, and economic development in the area of concern, once served by the historical Silk Roads.

“One of the case studies, presented at ROSCCA 2011 by Sufyan Kakakhel, described the scale of FOSS-related advantages in a Pakistan based project.” (see next slide)

Page 15: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Software: Different Options

Pakistan: Motorway police emergency helplineProprietary software solutions proposed:• $ 60K US / year• $ 400K US up front + annual sw renewal cost

+ additional costs if number of lines would need to be increased

Open Source solution, developed by local engineers from scratch:

• 3 million rupees ($ 33K US) one time cost

Page 16: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Communication as a Complex Issue

“I would like to attract the attention on three different statements, all contained in the Call for Papers to this workshop.

All of them deal with communication, the need to improve it, and the difficulty in doing so while stakeholders – or audiences, as far as a museum would be concerned – are becoming more and more diverse.”

Page 17: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Communication between Communities

• [There is the] “need to enlarge the level of community involvement in creating and enriching cultural knowledge”

• [The stakeholders’] “variety leads to the rise of communication gaps”

• [All of them] “have different cultural backgrounds, play different roles…, and use different …languages”

(CDCH 2012, Call for Papers)

Page 18: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Communication / Interpretation

“In a museum, communication also means that we have to take into account two different facts:

• Artefacts are - by definition – placed out of their original context, a context that has to be recreated in order for an artefact to again become intelligible

• The cultural background of an artefact can’t be taken for granted, so that many more clues have to be given than might have been originally needed to convey its meaning

This, as we’ll see in the next slides – taken from a presentation for a UNESCO workshop in Afghanistan

(May 2009) showing 6 case studies – can become very complex, but it is still to be considered as routine work.”

Page 19: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Audiences and Communities

About Guides, Interpreters, and Contexts

Alessandro Califano

UNESCO Training

"Risks and Opportunities: Difficult Challenges for Museum Professionals"

May 17 – 23, 2009Kabul, Afghanistan

Page 20: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Descriptions and Interpretations: 5 Case Studies…

Page 21: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Interpretations – 5 Case Studies + One In the previous slide:• Head of Bodhisattva, Central Asia (Guimet Museum,

Paris)• Horse rider, 19° century, Nuristan (National Museum of

Afghanistan, Kabul)• Shiva Nataraja, 11° century, Tamil Nadu – India (Guimet

Museum, Paris)• Annunciation, by Simone Martini & Lippo Menni, ca.1333,

Siena (Uffizi Museum, Florence)• Raven and the First Men (Haida creation myth), by Bill

Reid, 1980 (Museum of Anthropology, Vancouver)In the next slide:• Pop culture, movies, and TV icons form the background of

an Adoration of the Magi

Page 22: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Isabel Samaras – “Song of Birth: the 3 Magi”

Page 23: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Planning “Differently”

Way beyond the development of new strategies for differing storytelling needs, radically

different settings call us to deeply rethink our assumptions in planning.

“Standard requirements may well remain the same, but the way to achieve them will vary,

according to the new context:”

Page 24: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Fire Fighting Measures (Murad Khane, Kabul)

Ensuring an effective security systems against fire risks where reliable water / power sources may not – or not always – be readily available.

Page 25: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Energy Saving and Artefacts Protecting Measures

With the substitution of neon and incandescence lights with LEDs we can achieve up to over 90% of energy saving, while both heat and lux affecting the artefacts are very effectively kept under control.

Page 26: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Infrastructures

Could being a latecomer be an advantage,vs. being an early adopter?

Tajikistan:• 400 K phone land lines• 6.5 M cell phones• 2.5 Internet users – most on smart-phones

(via Talat Noumonov and Asomiddin Atoev, conversation in Kabul, 15 Oct. 2011)

Page 27: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

Flexibility as the Paramount Factor

Our technology-charged delivery of cultural heritage programmes in critical contexts will be adequate only

whenFLEXIBILITY

is set as the paramount feature of our planning

Thus, and to conclude, paraphrasing the Poet, we could say…

Page 28: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

“There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,Than are dreamt of in your technology.”

William Shakespeare, Hamlet (Act I, scene V)

Page 29: Standards, prototypes, and pilot projects - technology and flexibility in designing cultural heritage projects in challenging contextsinnsbruck 2012

...Tashakor! Vielen Dank! Thank you.

“A nation stays alive when its culture stays alive” – Kabul, National Museum of Afghanistan