1
Soybean Result Demonstrations Phillips County Arkansas - 2007 Robert Goodson – County Extension Agent-Ag, University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service Dr. Scott Akin, Dr. Gus Lorenz, Dr. Scott Munford, Trey Reaper, Dr. Jeremy Ross, Dr. Bob Scott Phillips County Cruiser Insecticide Soybean Seed Demonstration County Extension Agent: Robert Goodson Specialists: Dr. Gus Lorenz Planting Date: April 18, 2007 Variety: USG 7466 20 Foot drill on 7.5 inch p Hvest Date: August 13, 2007 1.28 ounces of Cruiser Insecticide on 100 lbs seed Stand Count (counts taken in 8 places in 10 ft spaces) Demonstration Economics: Cost of Insecticide (plus application) - $7.00 Yield Dollar Advantage (cash price at harvest $8.01 per bushel) - $59.11 per acre Profit: $52.11 per acre May 1, 2007 Plants Per Foot Total Plants Untreated Seed 1.96 146,370 Cruiser Treated Seed 2.2 164,293 Difference 17,923 Treatment Plot Width Length (ft) Harvest wt lbs Yield per Acre Cruiser Seed Treatment Rep 1 10 ft 460 210 33.14 bu Cruiser Seed Treatment Rep 1 10 ft 475 246 37.62 bu Cruiser Seed Treatment Rep 1 10 ft 475 214 32.72 bu Cruiser Seed Treatment Rep 1 10 ft 460 200 31.57 bu Average 33.76 bu No Seed Treatment Rep 1 10 ft 460 148 23.36 bu No Seed Treatment Rep 1 10 ft 475 180 27.52 bu No Seed Treatment Rep 1 10 ft 475 184 28.13 bu No Seed Treatment Rep 1 10 ft 460 168 26.52 bu Average 26.38 bu Differe nce 7.38 bu 2006 & 2007 Phillips County Soybean Fungicide Demonstration County Extension Agent: Robert Goodson Specialist: Dr. Scott Munford Variety: Schillinger 495 RC Application Date: July 18, 2007 R3-R4 Growth Stage Harvest Date: September 19, 2007 Materials applied: 6 oz of Quadris and Headline Fungicide 2006 Phillips County Soybean Fungicide Demonstration Results: No significant difference with any treatment in 2006 or 2007 2006 Demonstration non- replicated Quadris 6 oz 49.37 bu/ac Phillips County Check 53.11 bu/ac Headline 6 oz 59.40 bu/ac Average 4 replications Plot Size Plot Wt Yield per Acre Quadris 6 oz 0.2669 acre 684 42.71 Check 0.2669 acre 755.5 47.18 Headline 6 oz 0.2669 acre 730.5 45.62 2007 Soybean Verification Program County Agent: Robert Goodson Area Agronomist: Trey Reaper Planting Date: March 29, 2007 Harvest Date: August 18, 2007 Variety: Dekalb 4651 Burndown Program: 1 qt Glyphosate 8 oz Dicamba Fertility: 40 units of Potassium applied on 40 acres of field Herbicide Program: 2 applications of Glyhosate over the top 1 Irrigation Yield: 47.75 bushels per acre . Summary: Field planted early on 7 in drill. Some damage from dicamba because of lack of rainfall between burndown and emergence. Initial irrigation in June late due to lack of labor involved in wheat harvest. Field received adequate water during the month of June. Some disease pressure due to wet conditions in lower area of field. No Insecticide needed for the field Direct Cost (all cost based on Extension budgets) Planting: $50.56 (seed, tractor and planter Fertility: $30.00 Irrigation: $8.00 Herbicide: $34.00 (90 boom sprayer - 3 trips) Harvest: $14.00 Rent (20%): 70.50 (9.4 bu at $7.50/bu) Total Direct Cost per acre: 207.06 Income Yield 47.75 bu @ $7.50 per bushel - $358.13 Cost per acre 207.06 Profit: $151.07* *This does not include depreciation and other fixed cost Phillips County Soybean Burndown Demonstration 2007 and 2008 County Extension Agent: Robert Goodson Specialists: Dr. Bob Scott Application Date: March 1, 2007 March 9, 2008, Rating Date: March 30, 2007 March 31, 2008 NP – no weed pressure NA - No Application for that year *Round-up Weather Max 22 oz **Graxomone Inteon applied at 40 oz control numbers in % Product Mayweed Control Henbit Control BlueGra ss Control Primros e Control Maresta il Control 07 08 07 08 07 08 07 08 07 08 Check 2,4-D 2 pt NP 0 70 50 100 40 10 0 NA 65 50 Round-up NP 0 85 50 100 100 10 0 NA 20 20 Round-up* & Sencor 0.33 lb NP NA 100 NA 100 NA 10 0 NA 30 NA Round-Up* & Canopy Xl 6.4 oz NP NA 90 NA 100 NA 10 0 NA 65 NA Round-up*& Clarity 8 oz NP 100 90 80 100 100 10 0 NA 80 80 Round-up*& 2,4-D 2 pt NP 10 100 80 100 100 95 NA 90 80 Round-up*& Synchrony XP 1.5 oz NP 75 60 85 100 100 10 0 NA 50 85 Round-Up* & Valor 2 oz NP 80 100 10 0 100 100 10 0 NA 50 100 Graxomone Inteon** NP 50 65 10 0 75 100 10 0 NA 0 100 Gramoxone Inteon** & Sencor 0.33 lb NP NA 100 NA 40 NA 90 NA 25 NA Graxomone Inteon** & Canopy Xl 6.4 oz NP NA 95 NA 90 NA 90 NA 70 NA Graxomone Inteon** & Clarity 8 oz NP 80 80 10 0 100 100 80 NA 80 100 Graxomone Inteon** & Valor 2 oz NP 80 70 10 0 100 100 95 NA 10 100 Graxomone Inteon** & Synchrony XL 1.5 oz NP 70 100 10 0 100 100 10 0 NA 60 100 Round-Up* & Clarity 8 oz and Valor 2 oz NP NA 90 NA 100 NA 95 NA 80 NA Valor 2 oz NP NA 90 NA 100 NA 60 NA 0 NA Sychrony Xl 1.5 oz NP NA 60 NA 90 NA 90 NA 90 NA 2007 Maturity Group IV Soybean Variety Demonstration County Agent – Robert Goodson Specialist: Dr. Jeremy Ross Planting Date: May 14, 2007 Harvest Date: October 3, 2007 Variety Plot Size Acres Plot Wt Yield Bu/Ac Test Weigh t % Moist $ Value Economic Rank Progeny 4949 RR 0.3329 358 17.92 48.8 12.9 165.0 4 11 USG 7494 RR 0.3329 480 24.03 51.6 10.6 221.8 0 7 Pioneer 94B73 0.3329 410 20.53 51.7 11.7 189.4 9 9 Stein 4782 0.3788 556 24.46 56.9 13 226.2 6 6 Morsoy 4955 RR 0.3788 412 18.13 52.2 13.0 167.5 2 10 DeltaKing 4866 0.395 496 20.93 52.8 11.4 193.3 9 8 Schillinger 485RR 0.395 666 28.10 52.7 13.4 259.6 4 5 DeltaKing 4567 0.395 788 33.25 51.9 12.5 306.9 0 1 Progeny 4906 0.3326 582 29.16 47.5 11.3 268.5 6 4 Morsoy RT 4485N 0.395 698 29.45 53.6 10.5 286.4 7 2 Schilling 7490 105 0.395 698 29.45 53.8 13.3 272.4 1 3 Average 25.18 Soybean Stinkbug Control Phillips County County Agent: Robert Goodson Specialist: Dr. Scott Akin Purpose: To demonstrate the need to control Stinkbugs in late soybeans. Quality data will be gathered as well as the numbers on the insecticide applied. Initial Scouting Date: September 18, 2007 Soybean Growth Stage: Mid R5 GPS Location: 34 26.729 N 90 39,564 W Infestation uniform across field. 4 samples taken with same results. Application: 4.5 oz of Endigo on September 19, 2007. Material applied by air with 3 gallons of water per acre Field is 30 acres. Field treated down middle and 100 ft of west and east side not treated. Initial Insect Infestation. Field scouted with 25 sweeps in 4 distinct places in treatment and each side of non treatment. Quality Information Initial Field Infestation: Check with 25 sweeps 3 Green 3 brown 3 Green Nymphs Infestation 7 days after treatments West Non Treatment Treated Area East Non Treatment Rep 1 5 green, 1 Brown 1 Brown 1 Green, 2 Brown, 4 Nymph Rep 2 1 Green, 5 Brown 1 Brown 1 Green, 2 Brown, 1 Nymph Rep 3 4 Green, 4 Brown 1 Brown 3 Brown Rep 4 2 Green 3 Brown 1 Green, 1 Nymph Total 12 Green, 10 Brown 6 Brown 3 Green, 7 Brown, 5 Nymph Treatment (average of 3 samples) % Moist Test Weight % Damage Quality Deductions per bushel Bushel Value: Market price of $10.03 Insecticide 13.9 53.4 1.43 -0.21 9.82 No Insecticide 15.0 50.8 2.57 0.46 9.57 Soybean Storage Soybean Harvest Planting of Demonstrati on Plot SOYBEAN PRODUCTION SURVEY AND RESULTS Please take a few moments and answer the following questions to improve the Soybean Extension Program in Phillips County. Do you think you have a glyphosate resistant weed issue on your farm? 77% Yes 23% No If yes which weed? Palmer amaranth (pigweed) Marestail 34% Yes 66% No 77% Yes _23% No Do you use a residual herbicide in your weed control program? 66% Yes 34% No Estimate: Percentage of acres sprayed for fungicide at R3 Growth Stage 26% Estimate: Percentage of acres planted before April 1. 38% Did you spray a fungicide for Asian Soybean Rust in 2007? Yes 12% No 88% Estimate: Did you spray for stink bugs in 2007? 33% 0 times 55% 1 time 11% 2 or more Please rank issues on your farm 1 to 5 (1 most important) 3.4 Insect Control 2.1 Weed Control 2.8 Variety Selection 3.6 Disease Management 2.2 Planting Date SOYBEAN RESULT DEMONSTRATION IN PHILIPS COUNTY ARKANSAS - 2007 Abstract Akin, S [1] , Goodson,* R [2] , Lorenz, G [3] , Monfort, S [4] , Reaper, T [5] , Ross, J [6] , Scott, B [7] 1 Extension Entomologist, Arkansas Cooperative Extension, Monticello, Arkansas, 71656 2 Extension Agent-Ag, Arkansas Cooperative Extension, Phillips County, Arkansas 72342 3 Extension Entomologist, Arkansas Cooperative Extension, Lonoke, Arkansas, 72086 4 Extension Plant Pathologist, Arkansas Cooperative Extension, Stuttgart, Arkansas 72160 5 Extension Agronomist, Arkansas Cooperative Extension, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72203 6 Extension Agronomist, Arkansas Cooperative Extension, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72203 7 Extension Weed Scientist, Arkansas Cooperative Extension, Lonoke, Arkansas, 72086 The soybean result demonstration program consisted of agriculture demonstrations individual producer’s farms in Phillips County Arkansas. All demonstrations were carried to yield with a quality measurement included where possible. Demonstrations in soybeans included: herbicide burndown on no till soybeans, cruiser insecticide treated seed, soybean verification program, replicated fungicide demonstration, stinkbug control, maturity group IV variety, and a production survey. All demonstrations were carried out with producer equipment. Each demonstration was evaluated on its own merit and then combined into a county demonstration booklet. A major aspect of each demonstration was an economical ranking of each activity carried out. The verification program was used to compare Extension recommended production practices on an entire crop. The production survey was carried to insure that demonstration planned was what producers had actual issues with. Result demonstrations are an excellent way to transfer technology from a research base to Extension Clientele. Result demonstrations need to be relevant to the area so that producers will be able to use the information on their farm. To assist with the dissemination of information methods needs to be used to inform all producers of the results,, not only the producer participating in the program. This is done in Phillips County by the use of a printed demonstration book. Efforts must be made to insure quality data is gathered from these demonstrations. This includes measurement of plot size and correct weights of different treatments. Quality data will insure producers are willing to use the information gathered. By having an active result program more producers are willing to conduct activities on their farm. This increase in usage of Extension educational material has been a positive aspect of the program. Soybean Demonstration Program Conclusions:

Soybean Result Demonstrations Phillips County Arkansas - 2007

  • Upload
    nacaa

  • View
    716

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Soybean Result Demonstrations Phillips County Arkansas - 2007

Soybean Result Demonstrations Phillips County Arkansas - 2007 Robert Goodson – County Extension Agent-Ag, University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service

Dr. Scott Akin, Dr. Gus Lorenz, Dr. Scott Munford, Trey Reaper, Dr. Jeremy Ross, Dr. Bob Scott

Phillips County Cruiser Insecticide Soybean Seed Demonstration

County Extension Agent: Robert Goodson Specialists: Dr. Gus LorenzPlanting Date: April 18, 2007 Variety: USG 7466 20 Foot drill on 7.5 inch pHvest Date: August 13, 2007 1.28 ounces of Cruiser Insecticide on 100 lbs seedStand Count (counts taken in 8 places in 10 ft spaces)

Demonstration Economics:Cost of Insecticide (plus application) - $7.00Yield Dollar Advantage (cash price at harvest $8.01 per bushel) - $59.11 per acreProfit: $52.11 per acre

May 1, 2007 Plants Per Foot Total Plants

Untreated Seed 1.96 146,370

Cruiser Treated Seed 2.2 164,293

Difference 17,923

Treatment Plot Width

Length (ft)

Harvest wt lbs

Yield per Acre

Cruiser Seed Treatment Rep 1 10 ft 460 210 33.14 bu

Cruiser Seed Treatment Rep 1 10 ft 475 246 37.62 bu

Cruiser Seed Treatment Rep 1 10 ft 475 214 32.72 bu

Cruiser Seed Treatment Rep 1 10 ft 460 200 31.57 bu

Average 33.76 bu

No Seed Treatment Rep 1 10 ft 460 148 23.36 bu

No Seed Treatment Rep 1 10 ft 475 180 27.52 bu

No Seed Treatment Rep 1 10 ft 475 184 28.13 bu

No Seed Treatment Rep 1 10 ft 460 168 26.52 bu

Average 26.38 bu

Difference 7.38 bu

2006 & 2007 Phillips County Soybean Fungicide DemonstrationCounty Extension Agent: Robert Goodson Specialist: Dr. Scott MunfordVariety: Schillinger 495 RCApplication Date: July 18, 2007 R3-R4 Growth StageHarvest Date: September 19, 2007Materials applied: 6 oz of Quadris and Headline Fungicide

2006 Phillips County Soybean Fungicide Demonstration

Results: No significant difference with any treatment in 2006 or 2007

2006 Demonstration non-replicated Quadris 6 oz 49.37 bu/ac

Phillips County Check 53.11 bu/ac

Headline 6 oz 59.40 bu/ac

Average 4 replications Plot Size Plot Wt Yield per Acre

Quadris 6 oz 0.2669 acre 684 42.71

Check 0.2669 acre 755.5 47.18

Headline 6 oz 0.2669 acre 730.5 45.62

2007 Soybean Verification ProgramCounty Agent: Robert Goodson Area Agronomist: Trey ReaperPlanting Date: March 29, 2007 Harvest Date: August 18, 2007Variety: Dekalb 4651

Burndown Program:1 qt Glyphosate 8 oz DicambaFertility: 40 units of Potassium applied on 40 acres of fieldHerbicide Program: 2 applications of Glyhosate over the top1 Irrigation

Yield: 47.75 bushels per acre.

Summary: Field planted early on 7 in drill. Some damage from dicamba because of lack of rainfall between burndown and emergence. Initial irrigation in June late due to lack of labor involved in wheat harvest. Field received adequate water during the month of June. Some disease pressure due to wet conditions in lower area of field. No Insecticide needed for the field

Direct Cost (all cost based on Extension budgets) Planting: $50.56 (seed, tractor and planter Fertility: $30.00 Irrigation: $8.00Herbicide: $34.00 (90 boom sprayer - 3 trips) Harvest: $14.00Rent (20%): 70.50 (9.4 bu at $7.50/bu)Total Direct Cost per acre: 207.06

IncomeYield 47.75 bu @ $7.50 per bushel - $358.13Cost per acre 207.06 Profit: $151.07**This does not include depreciation and other fixed cost

Phillips County Soybean Burndown Demonstration2007 and 2008

County Extension Agent: Robert Goodson Specialists: Dr. Bob ScottApplication Date: March 1, 2007 March 9, 2008,Rating Date: March 30, 2007 March 31, 2008

NP – no weed pressure NA - No Application for that year*Round-up Weather Max 22 oz **Graxomone Inteon applied at 40 oz control numbers in %

Product MayweedControl

Henbit Control

BlueGrass Control

Primrose Control

Marestail Control

07 08 07 08 07 08 07 08 07 08

Check

2,4-D 2 pt NP 0 70 50 100 40 100 NA 65 50

Round-up NP 0 85 50 100 100 100 NA 20 20

Round-up* & Sencor 0.33 lb NP NA 100 NA 100 NA 100 NA 30 NA

Round-Up* & Canopy Xl 6.4 oz NP NA 90 NA 100 NA 100 NA 65 NA

Round-up*& Clarity 8 oz NP 100 90 80 100 100 100 NA 80 80

Round-up*& 2,4-D 2 pt NP 10 100 80 100 100 95 NA 90 80

Round-up*& Synchrony XP 1.5 oz

NP 75 60 85 100 100 100 NA 50 85

Round-Up* & Valor 2 oz NP 80 100 100 100 100 100 NA 50 100

Graxomone Inteon** NP 50 65 100 75 100 100 NA 0 100

Gramoxone Inteon** & Sencor 0.33 lb

NP NA 100 NA 40 NA 90 NA 25 NA

Graxomone Inteon** & Canopy Xl 6.4 oz

NP NA 95 NA 90 NA 90 NA 70 NA

Graxomone Inteon** & Clarity 8 oz

NP 80 80 100 100 100 80 NA 80 100

Graxomone Inteon** & Valor 2 oz

NP 80 70 100 100 100 95 NA 10 100

Graxomone Inteon** & Synchrony XL 1.5 oz

NP 70 100 100 100 100 100 NA 60 100

Round-Up* & Clarity 8 oz and Valor 2 oz

NP NA 90 NA 100 NA 95 NA 80 NA

Valor 2 oz NP NA 90 NA 100 NA 60 NA 0 NA

Sychrony Xl 1.5 oz NP NA 60 NA 90 NA 90 NA 90 NA

2007 Maturity Group IV Soybean Variety DemonstrationCounty Agent – Robert Goodson Specialist: Dr. Jeremy RossPlanting Date: May 14, 2007 Harvest Date: October 3, 2007

Variety Plot Size Acres

Plot Wt

Yield Bu/Ac

Test Weight

% Moist

$ Value Economic Rank

Progeny 4949 RR 0.3329 358 17.92 48.8 12.9 165.04 11

USG 7494 RR 0.3329 480 24.03 51.6 10.6 221.80 7Pioneer 94B73 0.3329 410 20.53 51.7 11.7 189.49 9

Stein 4782 0.3788 556 24.46 56.9 13 226.26 6

Morsoy 4955 RR 0.3788 412 18.13 52.2 13.0 167.52 10

DeltaKing 4866 0.395 496 20.93 52.8 11.4 193.39 8

Schillinger 485RR 0.395 666 28.10 52.7 13.4 259.64 5

DeltaKing 4567 0.395 788 33.25 51.9 12.5 306.90 1

Progeny 4906 0.3326 582 29.16 47.5 11.3 268.56 4

Morsoy RT 4485N 0.395 698 29.45 53.6 10.5 286.47 2

Schilling 7490 105 0.395 698 29.45 53.8 13.3 272.41 3

Average 25.18

Soybean Stinkbug Control Phillips County

County Agent: Robert Goodson Specialist: Dr. Scott Akin

Purpose: To demonstrate the need to control Stinkbugs in late soybeans. Quality data will be gathered as well as the numbers on the insecticide applied.

Initial Scouting Date: September 18, 2007Soybean Growth Stage: Mid R5GPS Location: 34 26.729 N 90 39,564 W

Infestation uniform across field. 4 samples taken with same results.Application: 4.5 oz of Endigo on September 19, 2007. Material applied by air with 3 gallons of water per acreField is 30 acres. Field treated down middle and 100 ft of west and east side not treated.

Initial Insect Infestation. Field scouted with 25 sweeps in 4 distinct places in treatment and each side of non treatment.

Quality Information

Initial Field Infestation: Check with 25 sweeps 3 Green 3 brown 3 Green Nymphs

Infestation 7 days after treatments West Non Treatment Treated Area East Non Treatment

Rep 1 5 green, 1 Brown 1 Brown 1 Green, 2 Brown, 4 Nymph

Rep 2 1 Green, 5 Brown 1 Brown 1 Green, 2 Brown, 1 Nymph

Rep 3 4 Green, 4 Brown 1 Brown 3 Brown

Rep 4 2 Green 3 Brown 1 Green, 1 Nymph

Total 12 Green, 10 Brown 6 Brown 3 Green, 7 Brown, 5 Nymph

Treatment(average of 3 samples)

% Moist Test Weight % Damage Quality Deductions per bushel

Bushel Value: Market price of $10.03

Insecticide 13.9 53.4 1.43 -0.21 9.82

No Insecticide 15.0 50.8 2.57 0.46 9.57

Soybean Storage

Soybean Harvest

Planting of Demonstration

Plot

SOYBEAN PRODUCTION SURVEY AND RESULTSPlease take a few moments and answer the following questions to improve the

Soybean Extension Program in Phillips County.

Do you think you have a glyphosate resistant weed issue on your farm? 77% Yes 23% NoIf yes which weed? Palmer amaranth (pigweed) Marestail 34% Yes 66% No 77% Yes _23% No

Do you use a residual herbicide in your weed control program? 66% Yes 34% No

Estimate: Percentage of acres sprayed for fungicide at R3 Growth Stage 26%

Estimate: Percentage of acres planted before April 1. 38%

Did you spray a fungicide for Asian Soybean Rust in 2007? Yes 12% No 88%

Estimate: Did you spray for stink bugs in 2007? 33% 0 times 55% 1 time 11% 2 or more

Please rank issues on your farm 1 to 5 (1 most important) 3.4 Insect Control 2.1 Weed Control

2.8 Variety Selection 3.6 Disease Management 2.2 Planting Date

SOYBEAN RESULT DEMONSTRATION IN PHILIPS COUNTY ARKANSAS - 2007

AbstractAkin, S[1], Goodson,* R[2], Lorenz, G[3], Monfort, S[4], Reaper, T[5], Ross, J[6], Scott, B[7]

1 Extension Entomologist, Arkansas Cooperative Extension, Monticello, Arkansas, 716562 Extension Agent-Ag, Arkansas Cooperative Extension, Phillips County, Arkansas 72342

3 Extension Entomologist, Arkansas Cooperative Extension, Lonoke, Arkansas, 720864 Extension Plant Pathologist, Arkansas Cooperative Extension, Stuttgart, Arkansas 721605 Extension Agronomist, Arkansas Cooperative Extension, Little Rock, Arkansas, 722036 Extension Agronomist, Arkansas Cooperative Extension, Little Rock, Arkansas, 722037 Extension Weed Scientist, Arkansas Cooperative Extension, Lonoke, Arkansas, 72086

The soybean result demonstration program consisted of agriculture demonstrations individual producer’s farms in Phillips County Arkansas. All demonstrations were carried to yield with a

quality measurement included where possible. Demonstrations in soybeans included: herbicide burndown on no till soybeans, cruiser insecticide treated seed, soybean verification program,

replicated fungicide demonstration, stinkbug control, maturity group IV variety, and a production survey. All demonstrations were carried out with producer equipment. Each demonstration was

evaluated on its own merit and then combined into a county demonstration booklet. A major aspect of each demonstration was an economical ranking of each activity carried out. The

verification program was used to compare Extension recommended production practices on an entire crop. The production survey was carried to insure that demonstration planned was what

producers had actual issues with.

Result demonstrations are an excellent way to transfer technology from a research base to Extension Clientele. Result demonstrations need to be relevant to the area so that producers will be able to use the information on their farm. To assist with the dissemination of information methods needs to be used to inform all producers of the results,, not only the producer participating in the program. This is done in Phillips County by the use of a printed demonstration book. Efforts must be made to insure quality data is gathered from these demonstrations. This includes measurement of plot size and correct weights of different treatments. Quality data will insure producers are willing to use the information gathered. By having an active result program more producers are willing to conduct activities on their farm. This increase in usage of Extension educational material has been a positive aspect of the program.

Soybean Demonstration Program Conclusions: