Upload
transportforum-vti
View
259
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Informal and formal networks in regional planning in Western Sweden
Merritt Polk TransportForumJanuary 2009
Informal and formal networks in Western Sweden
Informal networks and task groups• HUR 2050 (dec. 2002- on-going)
– K 2020 (2003-2006)– Urban planning (2006- on-going)– Freight 2030 (2008 – on-going)
GR formal project• K 2020 (dec. 2006-2008)
Future Challenges – creating a sustainable region
Collaborating partners: 30 representatives from the following 14 organizations
Regional Agency, Västra Götaland
Göteborg Regional Association
Region Västra Götaland
The Swedish Road administration
The Swedish Rail Administration
The Swedish Sea administration
Göteborgs Harbor
Transit Authority Göteborg
Environmental Agency Göteborg
City Planning Göteborg
Västtrafik
Business Region Göteborg
City Planning Mölndal
The Swedish Air Administration
• To develop a dialogue between stakeholders
• To achieve a common understanding regarding how infrastructure in the region can be planned for long term sustainability
• To create a platform for collaboration between all relevant actors
• To compile high quality data for decision-making in the region
• To develop a strategy for the realization of the agreed upon goals.
The initial objectives of the network
HUR 2050 Structure
Leadership group – 18 supervisors and managers from the 14 organizations
Project, working and task groups – representatives from the 14 organizations focusing of different tasks and issues
Various reference groups – youth group, under 30 representatives from the 14 organizations
The HUR 2050 process
Data collection
• Participation in workshops, leadership, task and working group meetings since 2005.
• Analysis of written material: meeting minutes and network documentation.
• Interviews with network members.Formal (18)Informal meetings (many)Mini workshop (1)
SUSTAINABILITY
TIME
Alternativescenarios
Future visions
”Sustainable”
”Non sustainable”Trends StrategiesPlaningAction
BACKCASTING
Pres
entC
ond
ition
s
1
2
3
4
Backcasting steps1. Present conditions (report)2. Dimensions and conditions for sustainable development
(3 background reports on ecological, social and economic sustainability)
3. The vision (scenario study, fms and Kairos Futures)4. Strategies and plans to meet the vision (Kairos Futures)
2 main methods were applied1. Scenario study with fms (Environmental strategies Unit at the
Royal Institute of Technology) Backcasting, brainstorming2. Workshops with Kairos Futures, a consulting agency,
brainstorming, modified SWOT
Some outcomes of the process thus far
• Consensus surrounding the definition of a sustainable transportation system
• A future vision for the region
• Strategic plans
• Task groups: Urban planning, Freight 2030
• Concrete projects: K 2020,Carbon dioxide strategy
1. Environmental sustainability Frame - emissions, CO2 reduced by approx. 2/3 by 2050
2. Economic sustainability Means- diversify the business community- flexibility, high educational levels within the region
3. Social sustainability Goal - reduce segregation - adequate accessibility and participation for all
Overall consensus on sustainable development in the Göteborg region
Two main framings of sustainable development in HUR 2050
• An alternative framing where the environment is seen as the limit or frame for sustainable development, the economy is the means and social sustainability is the goal. Equal importance is placed on all three dimensions.
• A mainstream/hegemonic framing where economic growth is seen as a prerequisite or means for attaining social and environmental sustainability. Economic growth is the overall goal.
The agreed upon vision, via backcasting - for the year 2050Göteborg region – a strong region in Northern Europe
• Compact cities with green areas.• A living, safe, and quiet city. • An accessible, integrated and diverse region.
• Lifestyles that promote sustainable development.• Reduction of transport. • More effective and attractive public transit and other private
transport.• More effective transport of goods.
• Internationally competitive business community. • Sustainable technology for vehicles and fuels.
Strategic plans
1. Develop attractive, secure, accessible and compact suburban areas
2. Change travel patterns to more sustainable ones3. Carry out collaborative planning of transport,
infrastructure and urban growth4. Create a learning environment for sustainable
development5. Prioritize social functionality and individual physical and
mental health6. Create more effective public and goods transportation7. Promote the development of sustainability via public
bidding, planning and decision-making
New task and project groups
1. K 2020: Sustainable infrastructure
2. Collaborative urban planning
3. Freight 2030
GR project: K 2020
K 2020 is a daughter project of HUR 2050 that deals with planning sustainable infrastructure for the Göteborg region in the year 2020.
K 2020 achieved a political mandate in December 2006,and included 50 people from 6 organizations working fulltime in the project. The main result of the project was a public transport program for the region which is based upon strategic goals and principles for infrastructure planning. K 2020 also produced pilot projects on transit centers, prioritized corridors and commuter parking.
The K 2020 public transport program was presented to the Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities (GR) in September 2008 . It is currently under review by the 13 individual municipal councils until February 2009.
K 2020
Specific research questions for today’s papers
What is the role of informal networks in transport planning for sustainable development?
What characteristics of multi-stakeholder processes increase the capacity of political and administrative institutions and organizations to better incorporate the complexity of sustainable development in transport and urban planning?
Can informal networks promote more adaptive and robust processes for regional planning that can better coordinate multi- level actions and act as platforms for collaboration and consensus?
Theoretical approaches
• Institutional capacity building via– Social capital: building trust via personal
relationships between network members– Intellectual capital: increasing formal and
informal expertise on the complexity surrounding sustainable transport
– Political capital: increasing the legitimacy and influence of the members and network in political processes
Summary of results• Increased individual and professional contacts across a
wide variety of sectors and levels.
• Enhanced intellectual expertise of the members and ability to deal with complex long-term questions.
• Both above, have increased the political legitimacy and influence of the members and network.
• All together have increased the institutional capacity to attain more sustainable solutions for long term transport planning.
Summary of results cont.
• Demonstrated the need for creating a unique niche for the network that does not threaten or intrude upon official processes and organizations. This was the long- term focus on 2050.
• Showed both the strengths and weaknesses of informal processes for long-term transport planning.
Strengths: innovative, enlightening, open forum for brainstorming, dealing with long-term, complex issues and for creating new projects
Weaknesses: unclear focus, threatening, ineffectual, confusing, reduced participation and legitimacy
Recommendations for other regions
1. Find a clearly defined niche for the network that is tailored for the specific planning context.
2. Create a flexible and adaptive organization that can take advantage of the network process and outcomes.
3. Pay special attention to finding a balance between visionary processes, implementation and effectiveness.