23
Webinar Hosts Earl “Poquito Grande” Follis Guy “Brutal Brutus” Ludden Daniel “Ginga Ninja” Flotten December 8, 2015 SERVER SMACKDOWN: RACKS VS. BLADES VS. HYPERCONVERGED Which Technology Will Exit The Octagon Victorious?

Server Smackdown: Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

  • Upload
    amd

  • View
    1.886

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

Webinar HostsEarl “Poquito Grande” FollisGuy “Brutal Brutus” LuddenDaniel “Ginga Ninja” Flotten

December 8, 2015

SERVER SMACKDOWN: RACKS VS. BLADES VS. HYPERCONVERGED

Which Technology Will Exit The Octagon Victorious?

Page 2: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

2| SERVER SMACKDOWN | DECEMBER 8, 2015

RACKS VS. BLADES VS. HYPERCONVERGED

Three competing physical server architectures

Blade servers

Rack servers

Hyperconverged servers

Page 3: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

3| SERVER SMACKDOWN | DECEMBER 8, 2015

RACK 'EM AND STACK 'EM: RACK SERVERS

Rack servers were the first attempts to increase DC server density Commonly found in many SMB server rooms and enterprise DCs Allow for easy hardware upgrades and reconfiguration Offer widest variety of server hardware configs

Page 4: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

4| SERVER SMACKDOWN | DECEMBER 8, 2015

DOUBLE-EDGED SWORDS: HIGH-DENSITY BLADE SERVERS

Provide maximum physical server density Ideal for physical server clustering

Common architecture in cloud computing and enterprises Can max out DC resources (cooling, power, network)

Page 5: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

5| SERVER SMACKDOWN | DECEMBER 8, 2015

HYPERCONVERGED: PUTTING THE HYPE IN HYPERCONVERGED

Combine compute, network and storage in same chassis Tight integration means easier to deploy and manage, higher

performance Ideal for remote or smaller offices

Integrated management console

Page 6: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

6| SERVER SMACKDOWN | DECEMBER 8, 2015

MORE ON HYPERCONVERGED SERVERS

Hype or not, hyperconverged has advantages Can lose a large % of useable storage to redundancy

Use various schemes to pool and cluster services Hyperconverged servers may not integrate with

legacy servers

Page 7: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

7| SERVER SMACKDOWN | DECEMBER 8, 2015

EVALUATING SERVER TECHNOLOGIES

Where each architecture shines (or doesn’t)

Matching architecture to workloads

Performance metrics and comparisons

Physical vs. virtual servers

Page 8: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

8| SERVER SMACKDOWN | DECEMBER 8, 2015

REDUNDANCY AND RESILIENCY IN THE RACK AND BLADE WORLD

Most rack and blade servers use OS-based redundancy schemes

Cluster/load balance your critical servers and storage Some offer proprietary resiliency Be sure to include networking redundancy

Page 9: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

9| SERVER SMACKDOWN | DECEMBER 8, 2015

Most hyperconverged servers offer clustering

Distributed storage can be harder to manage

Specific backup/restore planning may be required

Keep spare chassis onsite for redundancy

REDUNDANCY AND RESILIENCY IN A HYPERCONVERGED WORLD

Page 10: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

10| SERVER SMACKDOWN | DECEMBER 8, 2015

EVALUATING STORAGE CAPACITY IN HYPERCONVERGED SERVERS

Quoted capacity is not practical capacity with resiliency

Erasure coding vs. RAID Test and understand failover and failback capabilities

Distributed storage can complicate backup/restore

Page 11: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

11| SERVER SMACKDOWN | DECEMBER 8, 2015

BEST PRACTICES FOR IMPLEMENTING RACK SERVERS

Plan your physical and logical implementation Rack servers can be ordered preconfigured Use traditional clustering and failover technology Be mindful of physical installation requirements Keep spare chassis on hand when possible

Page 12: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

12| SERVER SMACKDOWN | DECEMBER 8, 2015

BEST PRACTICES FOR IMPLEMENTING BLADE SERVERS

Examine your DC resources carefully Track your blade server configs and workloads Hot spares are usually an option Keep cold spare blades in stock regardless

Page 13: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

13| SERVER SMACKDOWN | DECEMBER 8, 2015

BEST PRACTICES FOR IMPLEMENTING HYPERCONVERGED SERVERS

Plan carefully as hyperconverged servers are not as flexible Spare chassis may be useful to support physical redundancy Distributed storage may have specific backup requirements Hyperconverged servers may support WAN replication

Page 14: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

14| SERVER SMACKDOWN | DECEMBER 8, 2015

AND THE WINNER IS…

Best technological fit Best bang for your budget bucks Best hi-density computing fit Easiest to implement and manage

Page 15: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

And now for a word from our sponsor…

Page 16: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

16| SERVER SMACKDOWN | DECEMBER 8, 2015

BL465 8

DL385p G8

HP PROLIANT DL385P & BL465C GEN8 SERVER BLADE

Page 17: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

17| SERVER SMACKDOWN | DECEMBER 8, 2015

HP PROLIANT DL RACK SERVERS

Page 20: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

20| SERVER SMACKDOWN | DECEMBER 8, 2015

Final thoughts…

And now for the 13th Round!

Page 21: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

It’s Q&A Time!Any questions?

Page 22: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

For more information on AMD, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Servers, and PC Connection

Find out more at:http://www.pcconnection.com/brand/amd/servers

Or contact PC Connection directly at: 1-800-800-0014

Page 23: Server Smackdown:  Racks vs. Blades vs. Hyperconverged

THANK YOU!