58

Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Covariate-dependent modeling of

extreme events by non�stationary

Peaks Over Threshold analysis

A review and a case study in Spain

Santiago Beguerí[email protected]

Estación Experimental de Aula Dei,Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientí�cas (EEAD�CSIC), Zaragoza, España

Liberec, February 17th 2012

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 1 / 52

Page 2: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Motivation, I

We all love the extreme value theory (EVT) applied to the analysis ofclimatic hazard: it's elegant, simple, and provides useful andunderstandable results in terms of magnitude / frequency curves.

The stationarity assumption, though, was an important limitation ofthe EVT.

Relatively recent extensions of the EVT allow for non-stationaryanalysis (Coles, 2001), and an increasing number of authors areexploring their possibilities for the analysis of climatic hazard.

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 2 / 52

Page 3: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Motivation, I

We all love the extreme value theory (EVT) applied to the analysis ofclimatic hazard: it's elegant, simple, and provides useful andunderstandable results in terms of magnitude / frequency curves.

The stationarity assumption, though, was an important limitation ofthe EVT.

Relatively recent extensions of the EVT allow for non-stationaryanalysis (Coles, 2001), and an increasing number of authors areexploring their possibilities for the analysis of climatic hazard.

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 2 / 52

Page 4: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Motivation, I

We all love the extreme value theory (EVT) applied to the analysis ofclimatic hazard: it's elegant, simple, and provides useful andunderstandable results in terms of magnitude / frequency curves.

The stationarity assumption, though, was an important limitation ofthe EVT.

Relatively recent extensions of the EVT allow for non-stationaryanalysis (Coles, 2001), and an increasing number of authors areexploring their possibilities for the analysis of climatic hazard.

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 2 / 52

Page 5: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Motivation, II

Most studies up to now focused on identifying temporal trends in theoccurrence of extreme events, i.e. making time a covariate.

In the last few years other covariates with an expected in�uence onthe occurrence of extreme events are being used, too �> highrelevance for the statistical downscaling of reanalysis or model data,which typically cannot be used for local impact studio.

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 3 / 52

Page 6: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Motivation, II

Most studies up to now focused on identifying temporal trends in theoccurrence of extreme events, i.e. making time a covariate.

In the last few years other covariates with an expected in�uence onthe occurrence of extreme events are being used, too �> highrelevance for the statistical downscaling of reanalysis or model data,which typically cannot be used for local impact studio.

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 3 / 52

Page 7: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Summary

In this talk I will present ongoing research on the relationship betweenextreme precipitation and teleconnection indices in Spain, usingnon-stationary EVT techniques. The talk is organized as follows:

A review of non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Case study: relationship between teleconnection indices and extremerainfall events in Spain

Conclusions and future work

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 4 / 52

Page 8: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Summary

In this talk I will present ongoing research on the relationship betweenextreme precipitation and teleconnection indices in Spain, usingnon-stationary EVT techniques. The talk is organized as follows:

A review of non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Case study: relationship between teleconnection indices and extremerainfall events in Spain

Conclusions and future work

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 4 / 52

Page 9: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Summary

In this talk I will present ongoing research on the relationship betweenextreme precipitation and teleconnection indices in Spain, usingnon-stationary EVT techniques. The talk is organized as follows:

A review of non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Case study: relationship between teleconnection indices and extremerainfall events in Spain

Conclusions and future work

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 4 / 52

Page 10: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Summary

In this talk I will present ongoing research on the relationship betweenextreme precipitation and teleconnection indices in Spain, usingnon-stationary EVT techniques. The talk is organized as follows:

A review of non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Case study: relationship between teleconnection indices and extremerainfall events in Spain

Conclusions and future work

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 4 / 52

Page 11: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Short review of NSPOT analysis, I

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

050

100

150

200

Time (n = 266)

Inte

nsity

(mm

day

-1)

Peaks-over-threshold (POT) sampling: take only exccedances over a threshold, x − x0

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 5 / 52

Page 12: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Short review of NSPOT analysis, II

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

050

100

150

200

Time (n = 266)

Inte

nsity

(mm

day

-1)

Peaks-over-threshold (POT) sampling: take only exccedances over a threshold, x − x0

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 6 / 52

Page 13: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Short review of NSPOT analysis, III

Stationary POT: assuming independent inter-arrival times, the POT datafollows a Generalized-Pareto distribution.

Probability of exceedance:

P (X > x |X > x0) = 1− λ(1+ κ

x − x0α

)−1/κ

(1)

Quantile corresponding to a return period T :

XT = x0 +α

κ

[1−

(1

λT

)κ](2)

(beware of alternative conventions: x0 = u, α = σ, κ = ξ)

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 7 / 52

Page 14: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Short review of NSPOT analysis, IV

Approaches for assessing non-stationarity in POT modeling:

Split-sample approach (Li et al., 2005)

Moving kernel (Hall and Tajvidi, 2000)

Non-stationary POT (NSPOT) modeling

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 8 / 52

Page 15: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Short review of NSPOT analysis, V

1 2 5 10 20 50 100

050

010

0015

0020

0025

00

Return period curves, GPar distribution

return period (years)

daily

EI

NAO−

NAO+

Split-sample approach: independent models for positive and negative phases of NAO (Angulo et al., 2011).

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 9 / 52

Page 16: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Short review of NSPOT analysis, VI2110 S. BEGUERIA et al.

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

1930 1950 1970 1990 2010

X287

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

1930 1950 1970 1990 2010

X164

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

1930 1950 1970 1990 2010

X9198

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

1930 1950 1970 1990 2010

X2234

Figure 6. Model uncertainty: time variation of the 10-year return period event intensity standard error (mm d−1) by a nonparametric NSPOTmodel (dots), a linear NSPOT model (solid line), a high order polynomial NSPOT model (short-dashed line) and a stationary POT model

(long-dashed line) in four stations. Location of the stations is shown in Figure 1.

by more than 50% (e.g. series X164). The time evolutionof q10 depended on the evolution of both α (scale) andκ (shape), although the effect of the latter parameter wasmuch stronger. The amplitude of the confidence bandwas also well correlated to the value of κ , with a negativerelationship. It is noteworthy that, although a linear modelwas used for both parameters, their combined effect canlead to a curvilinear relationship between q10 and time,although the highest/lowest values of q10 always occurredat the beginning/end of the time period.

Comparison of the nonparametric and the parametricapproaches to NSPOT modelling (dots and lines inFigures 4 and 5) shows the main advantages of the latterapproach: (1) to provide estimates of extreme events atthe beginning and the end of the time series, whichare lost in the nonparametric model due to the movingwindow necessary to obtain sub-samples and (2) to offerrobustness against the occurrence of very extreme events,which have a major impact on the nonparametric modeldue to the shorter time span of the sub-samples. Thisis clearly shown by the magnitude of the standard errorof q10, which was much higher for the nonparametricmodel (Figure 6). The standard error of the parametricNSPOT model was, in average, equivalent to that of the(parametric) stationary POT model, illustrating one of theprincipal advantages of the parametric NSPOT approach.

High order polynomial NSPOT models were also fittedto the data (Figure 7). Models of increasing complexitywere tested for significance against the stationary model,

and the most parsimonious (i.e. with the lowest polyno-mial order) was chosen. Following this approach, statis-tical significance was found in 45 (70.3%) models forintensity and 42 (65.5%) for magnitude. The models hadorders between 5 and 9 for both α and κ , which reflectsquite a high complexity. It is evident that high order poly-nomials are more flexible for fitting complex data, butthat comes at the expense of reduced reliability. In fact,the models have the same drawbacks as the nonpara-metric approach: (1) excessive impact of outlier observa-tions resulting in over-fitting and (2) non-reliability at thebeginning and the end of the study period, as shown bythe large increase in the uncertainty bands in many cases(e.g. series X9198 in Figure 7 and short-dashed lines inFigure 6).

With respect to the time series of q10, differenceswere occasionally found between adjacent observatories,reflecting the influence of single, very localized extremeevents. Maps of q10 were produced to visualize the spatialdistribution of the q10 difference at the beginning and theend of the period of study, and to check the regionalcoherence of the stations for which a linear NSPOTmodel was significant (Figures 8 and 9). Differences inq10 were not very high for both the event intensity andmagnitude at the annual level (ranging between −10 and+30% in most cases), and the spatial distribution of thefew significant series was random, suggesting that notrends exist in the study area.

Copyright 2010 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 31: 2102–2114 (2011)

Moving kernel approach: time variability in the P10 quantile, based on a moving window of the previous 20 years ofdata (Beguería et al., 2011).

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 10 / 52

Page 17: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Short review of NSPOT analysis, VII

Stationary POT:

P (X > x |X > x0) = 1− λ(1+ κ

x − x0α

)−1/κ

Non-stationary POT:

P (X > x |X > x0,C ) = 1− λ(c)(1+ κ(c)

x − x0(c)α(c)

)−1/κ(c)

(3)

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 11 / 52

Page 18: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Short review of NSPOT analysis, VIII

Some examples of NSPOT analysis of climatic variables:

Time dependence of T and P (Smith, 1999)

Nogaj et al. (2006) time trends of T extremes over the NA region

Laurent and Parey (2007), Parey et al. (2007), T extremes in France

Méndez et al. (2006), trends and seasonality of POT wave height

Yiou et al. (2006) trends of POT discharge in the Czech Republic

Abaurrea et al. (2007) trends of POT T in the IP

Acero et al. (2011), Beguería et al. (2011), trends in POT P, IP

Friederichs (2010), Kallache et al. (2011), downscaling of POT P based onreanalysis / GCM data

Tramblay et al. (2012), covariation between POT P extremes and

atmospheric covariates, SE France

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 12 / 52

Page 19: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Teleconnections a�ecting precipitation in IP, I

The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO).

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 13 / 52

Page 20: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Teleconnections a�ecting precipitation in IP, II

The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO).

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 14 / 52

Page 21: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Teleconnections a�ecting precipitation in IP, III

The Mediterranean Oscillation (MO, Palutikof 2003).

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 15 / 52

Page 22: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Teleconnections a�ecting precipitation in IP, IV

The Mediterranean Oscillation (MO, Palutikof 2003).

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 16 / 52

Page 23: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Teleconnections a�ecting precipitation in IP, V

The Western Mediterranean Oscillation (WEMO, Martín-Vide and López-Bustins 2006).

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 17 / 52

Page 24: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Teleconnections a�ecting precipitation in IP, VI

The Western Mediterranean Oscillation (WEMO, Martín-Vide and López-Bustins 2006).

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 18 / 52

Page 25: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Teleconnections a�ecting precipitation in IP, VII

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●●

● ● ●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

−1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

−1.

5−

0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

MOi

NA

Oi

r2=0.21

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

● ●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●● ●

●●

● ● ●

● ●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

−1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

−1.

5−

0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

WEMOi

NA

Oi

r2=0.005

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●●

● ●

● ●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

● ●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●

●●

−1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

−1.

5−

0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

MOi

WE

MO

i

r2=0.047

Correlations between teleconnection indices.

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 19 / 52

Page 26: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Dataset, I

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●● ●●

●●●

●●●●

●●

●●●

●● ●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●●●

●●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

Stations network

106 stations, 58 daily precipitation series reconstructed for the period 1950-2009 (source: AEMET).

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 20 / 52

Page 27: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Dataset, II

Teleconnection indices (Reykjavik, Padova, Lod and Gibraltar). Sources: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk,http://www.ub.es.

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 21 / 52

Page 28: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Dataset, III

0 20 40 60 80

−2

−1

01

NA

Oi

0 20 40 60 80

−2

−1

01

2

WE

MO

i

0 20 40 60 80

05

1015

Time (days since 01/11/2001)

P (

mm

/day

)

Declustering: intensity and magnitude series and associated teleconnection indices.

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 22 / 52

Page 29: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Dataset, IV

0 20 40 60 80

−2

−1

01

NA

Oi

0 20 40 60 80

−2

−1

01

2

WE

MO

i

0 20 40 60 80

05

1020

Time (days since 01/11/2001)

P (

mm

/day

)

Declustering: intensity and magnitude series and associated teleconnection indices.

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 23 / 52

Page 30: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Dataset, V

0 20 40 60 80

−2

−1

01

NA

Oi

0 20 40 60 80

05

1020

Time (days since 01/11/2001)

P (

mm

/day

)

0 20 40 60 80

−2

−1

01

2

WE

MO

i

0 20 40 60 80

05

1020

Time (days since 01/11/2001)

P (

mm

/day

)

Declustering: intensity and magnitude series and associated teleconnection indices.

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 24 / 52

Page 31: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Dataset, VI

0 20 40 60 80

−2

−1

01

NA

Oi

0 20 40 60 80

05

1015

Time (days since 01/11/2001)

P (

mm

/day

)

0 20 40 60 80

−2

−1

01

2

WE

MO

i

0 20 40 60 80

05

1015

Time (days since 01/11/2001)

P (

mm

/day

)

Declustering: intensity and magnitude series and associated teleconnection indices.

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 25 / 52

Page 32: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Analysis, I

M0: P (X > x |X > x0) = 1− λ(1+ κ x−x0

α

)−1/κ

M1: P (X > x |X > x0,C ) = 1− λ(1+ κ x−x0(c)

α(c)

)−1/κ

x0 = β0 + βic (4)

α = γ0γci (5)

κ = δ (6)

λ = ε (7)

Likelihood ratio test:

D = − 2 (`1(M1)− `0(M0)) (8)

distributed according to χ2k(with d.f. k = 4).

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 26 / 52

Page 33: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Analysis, II

R, package ismev (Stuart Coles, ported to R by Alec Stephenson).

...m0 <� gpd.�t(xdat=dat, threshold=u, npy=rate)...uu <� predict(lm(v∼cdat))m1 <� gpd.�t(xdat=dat, threshold=uu, npy=rate, ydat=cdat,sigl=1, siglink=exp)

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 27 / 52

Page 34: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Analysis, III

Histogram of tel$naoi

tel$naoi

Frequency

-2 0 2 4 6

01000

2000

3000

4000

Histogram of pnorm(tel$naoi)

pnorm(tel$naoi)

Frequency

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

0200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Covariates: NAOi and pnorm(NAOi)

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 28 / 52

Page 35: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Example: Valencia, I

0e+00 5e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

Location of station: VALENCIA, X8416

Spatial location

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 29 / 52

Page 36: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Example: Valencia, II

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

2025

3035

4045

50

u

Mea

n E

xces

s

Threshold (u = q0.9 = 23.5, n = 229)

50 100 150 200 250

Intensity (mm day−1)Intensity (mm)Intensity (days)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

Stationary model (AIC=1875)

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

Stationary model: �xed threshold

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 30 / 52

Page 37: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Example: Valencia, III

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

2025

3035

4045

50

u

Mea

n E

xces

s

Threshold (u = q0.9 = 23.5, n = 229)

50 100 150 200 250

Intensity (mm day−1)Intensity (mm)Intensity (days)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

Stationary model (AIC=1875)

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

Stationary model: quantile plot

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 31 / 52

Page 38: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Example: Valencia, IV

●●

●●● ●● ●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●● ●

●● ●●

● ●● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

● ●● ●

● ●

●●●

●●

●●

●● ●

● ●● ●●

●● ●

● ●● ●

●●

● ●● ●● ●

●●

●●●

● ●●

●●

●●

● ● ●●● ●●

●●● ●● ●● ●●●

●●

● ●

●●●●

●● ● ●●

●● ●●

● ●

●●

● ●●

● ●● ● ●●●●●

●● ●●

●● ● ●

● ●●● ●

●●●

●●● ● ●

● ● ●●

● ● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●●

● ●● ●● ●

●●

●● ●●●

● ● ● ● ●

● ●

●●

●● ●● ●

●●● ●

●●

●● ● ●

● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ● ●● ●●

● ● ●●

●●

●● ● ●

● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●● ●●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

● ●

●●● ●●

●● ●

●●● ●●●

● ●●

● ●●●●●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●● ●

●●●

● ●● ●●

● ● ●● ●●●●

● ●●

●●●

●●●●

●●●

● ●●●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

● ● ●

●●

● ●●

●●●●● ● ●

●● ●

● ●● ● ● ● ●●●

● ●

●● ●● ● ●●

●●

●●● ●● ●●●

●●

●●● ●● ●● ● ● ●

●●● ●

● ●●● ●●●●

●●●●

●● ●●

●●

●●

● ●●● ●●

●●● ● ●●● ●

● ●●

● ●●

●●●●

●●

●● ●●

●●● ●● ●●

●● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●●●● ●

● ●

●● ●●

●●

●●● ● ●●

● ●● ●●

●● ● ●

●● ●●

●●●●

●●●

●●●

● ● ●

●●

● ●●●● ●

●●●●

●● ●● ●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●●

●● ●● ● ● ●●● ●●

● ● ●● ●●● ●●●● ● ● ● ●● ●

●●

●● ●●

● ●

●●

● ●

● ●●●

●●●

●●●

●● ●●● ●

●●

●●

●●●

●●● ●

●●●

● ●

●●

● ●● ●●

●●

● ●●●● ●

●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●● ● ●●● ●●●●

●●

●●●

●● ● ●●

●●● ●

●●

● ●●

● ●●

● ●

●●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●● ●●

●●

● ● ●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●●

●●

●● ●

●● ●●

●●

●●●

●● ●

●●

● ●● ● ●●

●●

●● ●●●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

● ●● ● ● ●●

●● ● ● ●●● ● ●●●

● ●●●

●●●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●● ●●

●●●

●●● ●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●● ●

●●●

● ●● ●● ●●●

●●

●● ●●

● ●●

●●

● ●●

●● ●● ●●

●●●●

●●

●●

● ●● ●●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●●● ●●● ●● ●●● ●

● ●●

●●● ●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●● ● ●

●●

●● ●●

●● ●

● ●●● ●

●● ● ●

● ●

● ●● ●●●

●●

●●● ●●●

●● ●●●

●● ●●

●● ●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●●●

●● ● ●●

● ●

●●●

●●●●●

●● ● ●

●●

●●

●● ● ●●

● ●

● ● ●● ●● ●●●

● ●● ● ●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●● ●

● ●●

●●

●● ● ●●

● ●● ●

●●

●●

●● ● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●● ● ●●● ●● ●

●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

●●● ●●

●●

●●●● ●

●●

●● ●●

● ●● ● ● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●●●● ●●

●●● ●

●●●

● ●●

● ●

● ●

● ● ●●●

●●● ● ●●● ●●

● ● ●●

●● ●●●

● ●

● ●

●● ●

●●

●● ● ●●●●

●●● ●●

●●● ●●

●●

●●●

● ● ●●●

● ●

●●●

●● ●●●●

●●

●● ●

●●●● ● ●● ● ● ●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●● ●● ● ●● ●

●●●● ●●● ●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●● ●●● ● ●●

●●

●● ●●

●●●

●●

● ● ● ● ●●●

●●●

●● ● ●● ● ●● ●●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●●

●●●

●●

● ●● ●● ●

●●

●●● ●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●●● ● ●●● ●●

●●

●● ●

● ●● ● ●● ●●

● ●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●●●● ●

●●●

●● ●● ●●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●● ●

●●

●● ●●●●

●●

●● ●●●●●

●●

●●● ● ● ●●

●●● ●●● ● ●●● ● ●

● ●●●

●●●● ● ●●

●●● ●●

●●● ●

●●

●● ● ●

● ●●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●●● ●● ●

●●●

●●●●

●●

●● ●

●●●●● ●●

●●

● ●

●●● ●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●● ●

●● ●

●● ●●●

●●●● ●

●●● ●●

● ●● ●●●●

● ●

●●

●● ●●

● ● ●●

●● ●

● ● ●

●● ●●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●● ●

● ●

●● ●

● ● ●●

●●

●●

●● ● ●●

● ●

●●

●●●● ●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●● ●●● ●

●●

● ●●

●●●

●●●

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

050

100

150

200

WEMOi (n = 200)

Inte

nsity

(m

m d

ay−

1)

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

−2 −1 0 1 2

1015

2025

3035

WEMOi (AIC=1569*)

Sca

le p

aram

eter

50 100 150 200 250 300

Intensity (mm day−1)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100 −2−1−0.500.512

−2 −1 0 1 2

WEMOi

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

30 40

50 60

70 80

90 100

110 120 130

140 150 160 170

180 190 200 210

220 Non-stationary model: threshold model

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 32 / 52

Page 39: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Example: Valencia, V

●●

●●● ●● ●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●● ●

●● ●●

● ●● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

● ●● ●

● ●

●●●

●●

●●

●● ●

● ●● ●●

●● ●

● ●● ●

●●

● ●● ●● ●

●●

●●●

● ●●

●●

●●

● ● ●●● ●●

●●● ●● ●● ●●●

●●

● ●

●●●●

●● ● ●●

●● ●●

● ●

●●

● ●●

● ●● ● ●●●●●

●● ●●

●● ● ●

● ●●● ●

●●●

●●● ● ●

● ● ●●

● ● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●●

● ●● ●● ●

●●

●● ●●●

● ● ● ● ●

● ●

●●

●● ●● ●

●●● ●

●●

●● ● ●

● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ● ●● ●●

● ● ●●

●●

●● ● ●

● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●● ●●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

● ●

●●● ●●

●● ●

●●● ●●●

● ●●

● ●●●●●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●● ●

●●●

● ●● ●●

● ● ●● ●●●●

● ●●

●●●

●●●●

●●●

● ●●●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

● ● ●

●●

● ●●

●●●●● ● ●

●● ●

● ●● ● ● ● ●●●

● ●

●● ●● ● ●●

●●

●●● ●● ●●●

●●

●●● ●● ●● ● ● ●

●●● ●

● ●●● ●●●●

●●●●

●● ●●

●●

●●

● ●●● ●●

●●● ● ●●● ●

● ●●

● ●●

●●●●

●●

●● ●●

●●● ●● ●●

●● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●●●● ●

● ●

●● ●●

●●

●●● ● ●●

● ●● ●●

●● ● ●

●● ●●

●●●●

●●●

●●●

● ● ●

●●

● ●●●● ●

●●●●

●● ●● ●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●●

●● ●● ● ● ●●● ●●

● ● ●● ●●● ●●●● ● ● ● ●● ●

●●

●● ●●

● ●

●●

● ●

● ●●●

●●●

●●●

●● ●●● ●

●●

●●

●●●

●●● ●

●●●

● ●

●●

● ●● ●●

●●

● ●●●● ●

●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●● ● ●●● ●●●●

●●

●●●

●● ● ●●

●●● ●

●●

● ●●

● ●●

● ●

●●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●● ●●

●●

● ● ●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●●

●●

●● ●

●● ●●

●●

●●●

●● ●

●●

● ●● ● ●●

●●

●● ●●●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

● ●● ● ● ●●

●● ● ● ●●● ● ●●●

● ●●●

●●●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●● ●●

●●●

●●● ●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●● ●

●●●

● ●● ●● ●●●

●●

●● ●●

● ●●

●●

● ●●

●● ●● ●●

●●●●

●●

●●

● ●● ●●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●●● ●●● ●● ●●● ●

● ●●

●●● ●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●● ● ●

●●

●● ●●

●● ●

● ●●● ●

●● ● ●

● ●

● ●● ●●●

●●

●●● ●●●

●● ●●●

●● ●●

●● ●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●●●

●● ● ●●

● ●

●●●

●●●●●

●● ● ●

●●

●●

●● ● ●●

● ●

● ● ●● ●● ●●●

● ●● ● ●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●● ●

● ●●

●●

●● ● ●●

● ●● ●

●●

●●

●● ● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●● ● ●●● ●● ●

●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

●●● ●●

●●

●●●● ●

●●

●● ●●

● ●● ● ● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●●●● ●●

●●● ●

●●●

● ●●

● ●

● ●

● ● ●●●

●●● ● ●●● ●●

● ● ●●

●● ●●●

● ●

● ●

●● ●

●●

●● ● ●●●●

●●● ●●

●●● ●●

●●

●●●

● ● ●●●

● ●

●●●

●● ●●●●

●●

●● ●

●●●● ● ●● ● ● ●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●● ●● ● ●● ●

●●●● ●●● ●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●● ●●● ● ●●

●●

●● ●●

●●●

●●

● ● ● ● ●●●

●●●

●● ● ●● ● ●● ●●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●●

●●●

●●

● ●● ●● ●

●●

●●● ●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●●● ● ●●● ●●

●●

●● ●

● ●● ● ●● ●●

● ●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●●●● ●

●●●

●● ●● ●●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●● ●

●●

●● ●●●●

●●

●● ●●●●●

●●

●●● ● ● ●●

●●● ●●● ● ●●● ● ●

● ●●●

●●●● ● ●●

●●● ●●

●●● ●

●●

●● ● ●

● ●●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●●● ●● ●

●●●

●●●●

●●

●● ●

●●●●● ●●

●●

● ●

●●● ●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●● ●

●● ●

●● ●●●

●●●● ●

●●● ●●

● ●● ●●●●

● ●

●●

●● ●●

● ● ●●

●● ●

● ● ●

●● ●●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●● ●

● ●

●● ●

● ● ●●

●●

●●

●● ● ●●

● ●

●●

●●●● ●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●● ●●● ●

●●

● ●●

●●●

●●●

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

050

100

150

200

WEMOi (n = 200)

Inte

nsity

(m

m d

ay−

1)

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

−2 −1 0 1 2

1015

2025

3035

WEMOi (AIC=1569*)

Sca

le p

aram

eter

50 100 150 200 250 300

Intensity (mm day−1)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100 −2−1−0.500.512

−2 −1 0 1 2

WEMOi

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

30 40

50 60

70 80

90 100

110 120 130

140 150 160 170

180 190 200 210

220 Non-stationary model: scale parameter model

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 33 / 52

Page 40: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Example: Valencia, VI

●●

●●● ●● ●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●● ●

●● ●●

● ●● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

● ●● ●

● ●

●●●

●●

●●

●● ●

● ●● ●●

●● ●

● ●● ●

●●

● ●● ●● ●

●●

●●●

● ●●

●●

●●

● ● ●●● ●●

●●● ●● ●● ●●●

●●

● ●

●●●●

●● ● ●●

●● ●●

● ●

●●

● ●●

● ●● ● ●●●●●

●● ●●

●● ● ●

● ●●● ●

●●●

●●● ● ●

● ● ●●

● ● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●●

● ●● ●● ●

●●

●● ●●●

● ● ● ● ●

● ●

●●

●● ●● ●

●●● ●

●●

●● ● ●

● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ● ●● ●●

● ● ●●

●●

●● ● ●

● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●● ●●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

● ●

●●● ●●

●● ●

●●● ●●●

● ●●

● ●●●●●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●● ●

●●●

● ●● ●●

● ● ●● ●●●●

● ●●

●●●

●●●●

●●●

● ●●●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

● ● ●

●●

● ●●

●●●●● ● ●

●● ●

● ●● ● ● ● ●●●

● ●

●● ●● ● ●●

●●

●●● ●● ●●●

●●

●●● ●● ●● ● ● ●

●●● ●

● ●●● ●●●●

●●●●

●● ●●

●●

●●

● ●●● ●●

●●● ● ●●● ●

● ●●

● ●●

●●●●

●●

●● ●●

●●● ●● ●●

●● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●●●● ●

● ●

●● ●●

●●

●●● ● ●●

● ●● ●●

●● ● ●

●● ●●

●●●●

●●●

●●●

● ● ●

●●

● ●●●● ●

●●●●

●● ●● ●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●●

●● ●● ● ● ●●● ●●

● ● ●● ●●● ●●●● ● ● ● ●● ●

●●

●● ●●

● ●

●●

● ●

● ●●●

●●●

●●●

●● ●●● ●

●●

●●

●●●

●●● ●

●●●

● ●

●●

● ●● ●●

●●

● ●●●● ●

●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●● ● ●●● ●●●●

●●

●●●

●● ● ●●

●●● ●

●●

● ●●

● ●●

● ●

●●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●● ●●

●●

● ● ●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●●

●●

●● ●

●● ●●

●●

●●●

●● ●

●●

● ●● ● ●●

●●

●● ●●●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

● ●● ● ● ●●

●● ● ● ●●● ● ●●●

● ●●●

●●●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●● ●●

●●●

●●● ●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●● ●

●●●

● ●● ●● ●●●

●●

●● ●●

● ●●

●●

● ●●

●● ●● ●●

●●●●

●●

●●

● ●● ●●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●●● ●●● ●● ●●● ●

● ●●

●●● ●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●● ● ●

●●

●● ●●

●● ●

● ●●● ●

●● ● ●

● ●

● ●● ●●●

●●

●●● ●●●

●● ●●●

●● ●●

●● ●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●●●

●● ● ●●

● ●

●●●

●●●●●

●● ● ●

●●

●●

●● ● ●●

● ●

● ● ●● ●● ●●●

● ●● ● ●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●● ●

● ●●

●●

●● ● ●●

● ●● ●

●●

●●

●● ● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●● ● ●●● ●● ●

●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

●●● ●●

●●

●●●● ●

●●

●● ●●

● ●● ● ● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●●●● ●●

●●● ●

●●●

● ●●

● ●

● ●

● ● ●●●

●●● ● ●●● ●●

● ● ●●

●● ●●●

● ●

● ●

●● ●

●●

●● ● ●●●●

●●● ●●

●●● ●●

●●

●●●

● ● ●●●

● ●

●●●

●● ●●●●

●●

●● ●

●●●● ● ●● ● ● ●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●● ●● ● ●● ●

●●●● ●●● ●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●● ●●● ● ●●

●●

●● ●●

●●●

●●

● ● ● ● ●●●

●●●

●● ● ●● ● ●● ●●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●●

●●●

●●

● ●● ●● ●

●●

●●● ●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●●● ● ●●● ●●

●●

●● ●

● ●● ● ●● ●●

● ●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●●●● ●

●●●

●● ●● ●●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●● ●

●●

●● ●●●●

●●

●● ●●●●●

●●

●●● ● ● ●●

●●● ●●● ● ●●● ● ●

● ●●●

●●●● ● ●●

●●● ●●

●●● ●

●●

●● ● ●

● ●●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●●● ●● ●

●●●

●●●●

●●

●● ●

●●●●● ●●

●●

● ●

●●● ●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●● ●

●● ●

●● ●●●

●●●● ●

●●● ●●

● ●● ●●●●

● ●

●●

●● ●●

● ● ●●

●● ●

● ● ●

●● ●●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●● ●

● ●

●● ●

● ● ●●

●●

●●

●● ● ●●

● ●

●●

●●●● ●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●● ●●● ●

●●

● ●●

●●●

●●●

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

050

100

150

200

WEMOi (n = 200)

Inte

nsity

(m

m d

ay−

1)

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

−2 −1 0 1 2

1015

2025

3035

WEMOi (AIC=1569*)

Sca

le p

aram

eter

50 100 150 200 250 300

Intensity (mm day−1)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100 −2−1−0.500.512

−2 −1 0 1 2

WEMOi

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

30 40

50 60

70 80

90 100

110 120 130

140 150 160 170

180 190 200 210

220

Non-stationary model: quantile plot

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 34 / 52

Page 41: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Example: Valencia, VII

●●

●●● ●● ●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●● ●

●● ●●

● ●● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

● ●● ●

● ●

●●●

●●

●●

●● ●

● ●● ●●

●● ●

● ●● ●

●●

● ●● ●● ●

●●

●●●

● ●●

●●

●●

● ● ●●● ●●

●●● ●● ●● ●●●

●●

● ●

●●●●

●● ● ●●

●● ●●

● ●

●●

● ●●

● ●● ● ●●●●●

●● ●●

●● ● ●

● ●●● ●

●●●

●●● ● ●

● ● ●●

● ● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●●

● ●● ●● ●

●●

●● ●●●

● ● ● ● ●

● ●

●●

●● ●● ●

●●● ●

●●

●● ● ●

● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ● ●● ●●

● ● ●●

●●

●● ● ●

● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●● ●●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

● ●

●●● ●●

●● ●

●●● ●●●

● ●●

● ●●●●●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●● ●

●●●

● ●● ●●

● ● ●● ●●●●

● ●●

●●●

●●●●

●●●

● ●●●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

● ● ●

●●

● ●●

●●●●● ● ●

●● ●

● ●● ● ● ● ●●●

● ●

●● ●● ● ●●

●●

●●● ●● ●●●

●●

●●● ●● ●● ● ● ●

●●● ●

● ●●● ●●●●

●●●●

●● ●●

●●

●●

● ●●● ●●

●●● ● ●●● ●

● ●●

● ●●

●●●●

●●

●● ●●

●●● ●● ●●

●● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●●●● ●

● ●

●● ●●

●●

●●● ● ●●

● ●● ●●

●● ● ●

●● ●●

●●●●

●●●

●●●

● ● ●

●●

● ●●●● ●

●●●●

●● ●● ●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●●

●● ●● ● ● ●●● ●●

● ● ●● ●●● ●●●● ● ● ● ●● ●

●●

●● ●●

● ●

●●

● ●

● ●●●

●●●

●●●

●● ●●● ●

●●

●●

●●●

●●● ●

●●●

● ●

●●

● ●● ●●

●●

● ●●●● ●

●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●● ● ●●● ●●●●

●●

●●●

●● ● ●●

●●● ●

●●

● ●●

● ●●

● ●

●●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●● ●●

●●

● ● ●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●●

●●

●● ●

●● ●●

●●

●●●

●● ●

●●

● ●● ● ●●

●●

●● ●●●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

● ●● ● ● ●●

●● ● ● ●●● ● ●●●

● ●●●

●●●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●● ●●

●●●

●●● ●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●● ●

●●●

● ●● ●● ●●●

●●

●● ●●

● ●●

●●

● ●●

●● ●● ●●

●●●●

●●

●●

● ●● ●●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●●● ●●● ●● ●●● ●

● ●●

●●● ●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●● ● ●

●●

●● ●●

●● ●

● ●●● ●

●● ● ●

● ●

● ●● ●●●

●●

●●● ●●●

●● ●●●

●● ●●

●● ●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●●●

●● ● ●●

● ●

●●●

●●●●●

●● ● ●

●●

●●

●● ● ●●

● ●

● ● ●● ●● ●●●

● ●● ● ●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●● ●

● ●●

●●

●● ● ●●

● ●● ●

●●

●●

●● ● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●● ● ●●● ●● ●

●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

●●● ●●

●●

●●●● ●

●●

●● ●●

● ●● ● ● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●●●● ●●

●●● ●

●●●

● ●●

● ●

● ●

● ● ●●●

●●● ● ●●● ●●

● ● ●●

●● ●●●

● ●

● ●

●● ●

●●

●● ● ●●●●

●●● ●●

●●● ●●

●●

●●●

● ● ●●●

● ●

●●●

●● ●●●●

●●

●● ●

●●●● ● ●● ● ● ●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●● ●● ● ●● ●

●●●● ●●● ●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●● ●●● ● ●●

●●

●● ●●

●●●

●●

● ● ● ● ●●●

●●●

●● ● ●● ● ●● ●●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●●

●●●

●●

● ●● ●● ●

●●

●●● ●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●●● ● ●●● ●●

●●

●● ●

● ●● ● ●● ●●

● ●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●●●● ●

●●●

●● ●● ●●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●● ●

●●

●● ●●●●

●●

●● ●●●●●

●●

●●● ● ● ●●

●●● ●●● ● ●●● ● ●

● ●●●

●●●● ● ●●

●●● ●●

●●● ●

●●

●● ● ●

● ●●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●●● ●● ●

●●●

●●●●

●●

●● ●

●●●●● ●●

●●

● ●

●●● ●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●● ●

●● ●

●● ●●●

●●●● ●

●●● ●●

● ●● ●●●●

● ●

●●

●● ●●

● ● ●●

●● ●

● ● ●

●● ●●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●● ●

● ●

●● ●

● ● ●●

●●

●●

●● ● ●●

● ●

●●

●●●● ●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●● ●●● ●

●●

● ●●

●●●

●●●

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

050

100

150

200

WEMOi (n = 200)

Inte

nsity

(m

m d

ay−

1)

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

−2 −1 0 1 2

1015

2025

3035

WEMOi (AIC=1569*)

Sca

le p

aram

eter

50 100 150 200 250 300

Intensity (mm day−1)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100 −2−1−0.500.512

−2 −1 0 1 2

WEMOi

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

30 40

50 60

70 80

90 100

110 120 130

140 150 160 170

180 190 200 210

220

Non-stationary model: quantile plot

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 35 / 52

Page 42: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Example: Valencia, VIII

●●

●●● ● ●●

●● ●

●● ●

●●

●●●

●●

●● ●●

●● ●●

● ●● ●

●●

●● ●●

●●● ● ●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●

●●●

●● ● ●●

●● ●

● ● ●●

●●

●●● ● ●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●

●● ●●●● ●

●● ●●● ● ● ●● ●

●●

● ●

●●●●

●● ●●●

● ●●●

● ●

● ●

● ●●

● ●● ●●●● ●●

●● ● ●

●●● ●

● ●●● ●

● ●●

●●● ● ●

●● ●●

●● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●●

● ● ●● ●●

● ●

●● ●● ●

●● ● ● ●

●●

●●

● ●●● ●

● ●●●

●●

●●● ●

● ● ●●●

● ●

●●●

●●

●●

●●● ● ●● ●

●● ●●

●●

● ● ●●

● ● ●●●

●●

●●

●●● ●● ●●

●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

● ●

● ●●●●

●● ●

● ● ●● ●●

● ●●

●● ●● ●●●

●●

● ●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●●

● ●●

●●●

●● ●● ●

● ●●●● ●● ●

● ●●

●● ●●●

●●

● ●●

● ●●● ● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●●

●●

● ●●

●●●● ●● ●

●●●

● ●● ●●●●●●

●●

● ● ●● ●● ●

●●

●●● ●●● ●●

●●

● ●●●●● ●● ●●

●● ●●

●●● ●● ●●●

●● ● ●

●●●●

● ●

●●

●● ●● ●●

●●● ● ●● ●●

●●●

● ●●

●●●●

●●

●● ●●

● ● ●●● ●●

●●●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●● ●●● ●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●

● ●●●● ● ● ●

●●●● ●

●● ● ●

●● ●●

●●●

● ●●

●● ●

●●

●●●● ● ●

● ●●●

● ● ● ●●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●● ●

●● ●●●●● ● ●● ●

●● ● ●● ●●●● ● ●● ● ●● ●●

●●

● ●●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●● ●

●●●

●● ●

●● ● ●● ●

●●

●●

●●●

●● ● ●

●●●

●●

●●

● ●●●●

●●

●● ● ●●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

● ●

● ●● ●● ●● ●●●●

●●

●●●

●● ● ●●

●●● ●

●●

● ●●

●●●

●●

● ●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●● ●

●●

● ● ●

●●●●

●●

● ●●

●●●

●●

● ●● ●● ●

●●

●● ●●●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●●

●● ●

●●

● ●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

● ●● ● ●●●●●● ●● ●●● ●● ●

●● ●●

●● ●

●●● ●●

●●

●●● ● ●●

●●●

● ● ●●

●●●●●

●●

●●●

●● ●

●●●

●●●

●● ● ●●●● ●

●●

● ●●●

●●●

● ●

●●●

●● ● ●●●

●● ● ●

●●

● ●

●●● ●●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●●●●● ●●●● ●● ●●

●●●

●●● ●

●●

● ●●●

●●

● ●●● ●

●●

● ●●●

●●●

●● ●●●

●●● ●

●●

●● ●● ●●

●●

● ●● ●●●

● ● ●● ●

●● ●●

●● ●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●●●

● ● ● ● ●

● ●

● ●●

●● ●●●●●● ●

●●

●●

●● ● ●●

●●

● ● ●● ● ● ●●●

● ●● ●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●●●

● ●●

●●●

●●

●● ● ●●

●●●●

●●

●●●

● ● ●●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●● ●● ●●●

●●

● ●

● ●●

● ●

● ●●● ●

●●

●● ●●●

●●

●● ●●

● ●● ● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●● ● ●● ● ●

●●● ●

●●●

●● ●

● ●

● ●

●● ●● ●

●● ●●●● ● ●●

● ●●●

● ● ●●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

● ● ●●● ● ●

● ●● ●●

●● ● ● ●

●●

●● ●

● ●● ●●

● ●

●●●

●● ●● ● ●

●●

● ●●

● ●● ●● ●● ●●●

●●

●●

●● ● ●

●●● ●●●● ●

●●●● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●●

●● ●● ● ●●●

●●

●●●●

●●●

●●

● ●●● ● ● ●

●●●

● ●● ●● ● ●●●●

●● ● ●●

●●

●● ●●

●● ●

●●

●●●●●●

●●

●● ●● ●

●●●●

●●

●●

●● ● ●● ●● ●●●

●●

●●●

●●●● ● ●●●

● ●

● ●● ●●

●●

●●●

● ●●

●●● ●●

●●●

●● ●● ●●● ● ●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●● ●

● ●

● ●●●●●

● ●

●● ●●●● ●

●●

●●●● ●● ●

●● ●●●●● ● ●● ●●

●● ●●

●● ●●● ●●

● ● ●●●

●● ●●●

● ●●●

● ●●

●●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●● ●● ●● ●

●●●

●● ●●

●●

●● ●

● ● ●● ● ●●

●●

●●

● ●●● ●

●●

● ●●

● ●

●●●

● ●

●● ● ●

●● ●

●● ●●●

● ●● ● ●

●●●● ●

● ●●●●

● ●

● ●

●●

●● ● ●

●● ● ●

●● ●

● ●●

●● ● ● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●●● ●

●●

● ●●

● ●● ●

●●

●●

●● ● ●●

● ●

●●

●● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

● ● ●●

●●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●● ●●● ●

●●

●●●

●● ●

●●●

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

050

100

150

200

NAOi (n = 221)

Inte

nsity

(m

m d

ay−

1)

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●●

● ●

●●

●●●

●●●●

●●

●● ●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●● ●

−2 −1 0 1 2

1416

1820

NAOi (AIC=1817*)

Sca

le p

aram

eter

50 100 150 200 250 300

Intensity (mm day−1)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100 −2 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 2

−2 −1 0 1 2

NAOi

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120 130

140

150 160

170 180 190

200

●●

●●● ● ●●

●●●

●● ●

●●

●● ●

● ●

●●● ●

●●●●

● ● ●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●● ● ●

● ●

●●●

●●

●●

●● ●

● ●● ●●

●● ●

● ●● ●

●●

● ● ●● ●●

●●

●●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●●●●●

●● ● ●● ●● ●●●

●●

● ●

● ●●●

●● ● ●●

●● ●●

●●

● ●

●●●

● ●●● ●● ● ●●

●● ●●

●●● ●

● ●●● ●

● ●●

●●●● ●

● ● ●●

● ●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●●

● ●● ● ●●

●●

●● ●● ●

●● ● ● ●

●●

●●

●● ●● ●

● ●● ●

●●

●●● ●

● ● ●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●● ●●

●●●●

●●

●● ●●

● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●●●● ●●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●● ●●

●● ●

●●● ● ●●

● ●●

●● ●●●●●

●●

● ●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●●

●● ●

●●●

● ●● ●●

● ●● ●●●● ●

● ●●

●●●●●

●●

● ●●

●●●● ● ●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●● ●

● ●●

●●

● ●●

●● ●● ●● ●

●●●

● ●●● ●● ●●●

● ●

●● ● ●● ●●

● ●

●●● ●●● ●●

●●

● ●● ●●●● ●● ●

●●● ●

●●● ● ●●●●

●● ●●

●●●●

● ●

●●

● ●●●●●

●●● ●● ●● ●

● ●●

● ●●

●● ●●

●●

●● ●●

● ●●● ● ●●

●●●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

● ● ●

●●●●● ●

● ●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●● ●●● ●●●

●● ●● ●

●● ● ●

●● ●●

●●●

●●●

●● ●

●●

● ● ●●● ●

●●● ●

●● ● ●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●●● ● ●● ●● ●●

● ●●● ●● ●●● ● ●●● ● ● ●●

●●

● ●●●

● ●

●●

● ●

● ● ● ●

●●●

●●●

●●● ●● ●

●●

●●

●●●

●●● ●

●●●

● ●

●●

● ●● ●●

●●

●● ●●●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●● ● ●● ●●● ●●●

●●

●●●

●●● ●●

●●● ●

●●

● ●●

●●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

● ● ●

●●

● ●● ●

●●

● ●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●●

●●

●● ●

●●●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●●

● ●● ●●●

● ●

●● ●● ●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●●

●● ●

●●

● ●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

● ●● ● ● ●●

●● ● ●●●● ● ●● ●

●●●●

●● ●

●●● ●●

● ●

● ●● ●●●

● ●●

●●● ●

● ●● ●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●●●●

●●●

● ●● ●● ●● ●

●●

● ● ●●

●●●

●●

● ●●

●●● ●●●

●● ● ●

●●

● ●

●●● ● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ● ●● ●● ●● ●● ●● ● ●

● ●●

●●● ●

●●

● ● ●●

● ●

● ●●●●

●●

●● ●●

●●●

●● ●● ●

●● ●●

● ●

● ● ●●●●

●●

● ●● ● ●●

●● ●● ●

●●●●

●● ●●

●●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●●●

●● ●● ●

●●

● ●●

●●● ●●

● ●●●

●●

●●

●●●●●

● ●

●● ●● ●● ●●●

● ●● ● ●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●●●

●●●

● ●●

●●

● ●● ● ●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

● ●● ●●● ●●●

●●

● ●

● ●●●

●●

● ●● ● ●

●●

●● ●●●

●●

● ● ●●

● ●● ● ● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

● ● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ● ●● ●●● ● ●

●●● ●

●●●

● ●●

● ●

● ●

●● ● ●●

●● ● ●●●● ● ●

● ● ●●

● ● ● ●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●● ●● ●●

●●● ●●

●● ●● ●

●●

●●●

● ● ●● ●

●●

●●●

●● ●● ● ●

●●

●●●

● ●● ● ●● ●● ● ●

●●

●●

●● ●●

●● ●●● ●● ●

●●●● ●● ●●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●● ●● ● ●●●

●●

●●● ●

●●●

●●

● ● ● ● ●● ●

●●●

●●● ●● ● ●● ●●

●● ● ●●

●●

●●●●

●●●●

●●●●●●

●●

●●●● ●●

●● ●

● ●

●●

●● ●●● ●● ●●●

●●

●●●

●●●● ●●●●

●●

● ●●●●●●

●●●

●●●

●●●● ●

●●●

●● ●● ●● ●● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●

● ●

● ● ●●●●

● ●

●● ●●●●●

●●

● ●●● ●● ●

●●● ●●●● ●● ● ●●

●●●●

● ●● ● ●●●

● ● ●●●

●● ● ●

●●

● ● ●●

●●●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●● ●● ●● ●

●●●

●● ●●

●●

●●●

●● ●●● ●●

●●

●●

● ●● ●●

●●

● ● ●

● ●

●●●

● ●

●●● ●

●● ●

●● ●●●

● ●● ● ●

● ●●● ●

●●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●●

●● ●●

●● ●

● ●●

●● ●●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●●● ●

●●

●● ●

● ● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●●●

● ●

●●

●● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●● ●●●

●●

● ●●

●● ●

●●●

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

050

100

150

200

MOi (n = 223)

Inte

nsity

(m

m d

ay−

1)

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●●

●●●

●●

●● ●●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●●

●● ●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●● ●

● ●

●●●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●● ●

−2 −1 0 1 2

1416

1820

MOi (AIC=1831*)

Sca

le p

aram

eter

50 100 150 200 250 300 350

Intensity (mm day−1)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100 −2−1−0.500.512

−2 −1 0 1 2

MOi

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

30

40

50

60

70

80 90

100

110

120

130

140 150 160

170 180 190

200 210

●●

●●● ●● ●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●● ●

●● ●●

● ●● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

● ●● ●

● ●

●●●

●●

●●

●● ●

● ●● ●●

●● ●

● ●● ●

●●

● ●● ●● ●

●●

●●●

● ●●

●●

●●

● ● ●●● ●●

●●● ●● ●● ●●●

●●

● ●

●●●●

●● ● ●●

●● ●●

● ●

●●

● ●●

● ●● ● ●●●●●

●● ●●

●● ● ●

● ●●● ●

●●●

●●● ● ●

● ● ●●

● ● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●●

● ●● ●● ●

●●

●● ●●●

● ● ● ● ●

● ●

●●

●● ●● ●

●●● ●

●●

●● ● ●

● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ● ●● ●●

● ● ●●

●●

●● ● ●

● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●● ●●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

● ●

●●● ●●

●● ●

●●● ●●●

● ●●

● ●●●●●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●● ●

●●●

● ●● ●●

● ● ●● ●●●●

● ●●

●●●

●●●●

●●●

● ●●●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

● ● ●

●●

● ●●

●●●●● ● ●

●● ●

● ●● ● ● ● ●●●

● ●

●● ●● ● ●●

●●

●●● ●● ●●●

●●

●●● ●● ●● ● ● ●

●●● ●

● ●●● ●●●●

●●●●

●● ●●

●●

●●

● ●●● ●●

●●● ● ●●● ●

● ●●

● ●●

●●●●

●●

●● ●●

●●● ●● ●●

●● ●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●●●● ●

● ●

●● ●●

●●

●●● ● ●●

● ●● ●●

●● ● ●

●● ●●

●●●●

●●●

●●●

● ● ●

●●

● ●●●● ●

●●●●

●● ●● ●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●●

●● ●● ● ● ●●● ●●

● ● ●● ●●● ●●●● ● ● ● ●● ●

●●

●● ●●

● ●

●●

● ●

● ●●●

●●●

●●●

●● ●●● ●

●●

●●

●●●

●●● ●

●●●

● ●

●●

● ●● ●●

●●

● ●●●● ●

●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●● ● ●●● ●●●●

●●

●●●

●● ● ●●

●●● ●

●●

● ●●

● ●●

● ●

●●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●● ●●

●●

● ● ●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●●

●●

●● ●

●● ●●

●●

●●●

●● ●

●●

● ●● ● ●●

●●

●● ●●●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

● ●● ● ● ●●

●● ● ● ●●● ● ●●●

● ●●●

●●●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●● ●●

●●●

●●● ●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●● ●

●●●

● ●● ●● ●●●

●●

●● ●●

● ●●

●●

● ●●

●● ●● ●●

●●●●

●●

●●

● ●● ●●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●●● ●●● ●● ●●● ●

● ●●

●●● ●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●● ● ●

●●

●● ●●

●● ●

● ●●● ●

●● ● ●

● ●

● ●● ●●●

●●

●●● ●●●

●● ●●●

●● ●●

●● ●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●●●

●● ● ●●

● ●

●●●

●●●●●

●● ● ●

●●

●●

●● ● ●●

● ●

● ● ●● ●● ●●●

● ●● ● ●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●● ●

● ●●

●●

●● ● ●●

● ●● ●

●●

●●

●● ● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●● ● ●●● ●● ●

●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

●●● ●●

●●

●●●● ●

●●

●● ●●

● ●● ● ● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●●●●● ●●

●●● ●

●●●

● ●●

● ●

● ●

● ● ●●●

●●● ● ●●● ●●

● ● ●●

●● ●●●

● ●

● ●

●● ●

●●

●● ● ●●●●

●●● ●●

●●● ●●

●●

●●●

● ● ●●●

● ●

●●●

●● ●●●●

●●

●● ●

●●●● ● ●● ● ● ●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●● ●● ● ●● ●

●●●● ●●● ●

●●

●●

● ●●●

●● ●●● ● ●●

●●

●● ●●

●●●

●●

● ● ● ● ●●●

●●●

●● ● ●● ● ●● ●●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●●

●●●

●●

● ●● ●● ●

●●

●●● ●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●●● ● ●●● ●●

●●

●● ●

● ●● ● ●● ●●

● ●

● ●●●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●●●● ●

●●●

●● ●● ●●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●● ●

●●

●● ●●●●

●●

●● ●●●●●

●●

●●● ● ● ●●

●●● ●●● ● ●●● ● ●

● ●●●

●●●● ● ●●

●●● ●●

●●● ●

●●

●● ● ●

● ●●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●●● ●● ●

●●●

●●●●

●●

●● ●

●●●●● ●●

●●

● ●

●●● ●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●● ●

●● ●

●● ●●●

●●●● ●

●●● ●●

● ●● ●●●●

● ●

●●

●● ●●

● ● ●●

●● ●

● ● ●

●● ●●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●● ●

● ●

●● ●

● ● ●●

●●

●●

●● ● ●●

● ●

●●

●●●● ●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●● ●●● ●

●●

● ●●

●●●

●●●

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

050

100

150

200

WEMOi (n = 200)

Inte

nsity

(m

m d

ay−

1)

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

−2 −1 0 1 2

1015

2025

3035

WEMOi (AIC=1569*)

Sca

le p

aram

eter

50 100 150 200 250 300

Intensity (mm day−1)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100 −2−1−0.500.512

−2 −1 0 1 2

WEMOi

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

30 40

50 60

70 80

90 100

110 120 130

140 150 160 170

180 190 200 210

220

Non-stationary model: NAO (left), MO (center), WEMO (right)

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 36 / 52

Page 43: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Results: event's magnitude, I

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

NAO effect on q100

x times

1.25234

E�ect of NAO on the 100-years return period event:

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 37 / 52

Page 44: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Results: event's magnitude, II

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

MO effect on q100

x times

1.25234

E�ect of MO on the 100-years return period event

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 38 / 52

Page 45: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Results: event's magnitude, III

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

WEMO effect on q100

x times

1.25234

E�ect of WEMO on the 100-years return period event

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 39 / 52

Page 46: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Results: event's intensity

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

NAO effect on q100

x times

1.25234

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

MO effect on q100

x times

1.25234

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

WEMO effect on q100

x times

1.25234

E�ect of NAO, MO and WEMO on the 100-years return period event

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 40 / 52

Page 47: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Results: event's magnitude, winter

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

NAO effect on q100

x times

1.25234

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

MO effect on q100

x times

1.25234

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

WEMO effect on q100

x times

1.25234

E�ect of NAO, MO and WEMO on the 100-years return period event

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 41 / 52

Page 48: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Results: event's magnitude, spring

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

NAO effect on q100

x times

1.25234

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

MO effect on q100

x times

1.25234

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

WEMO effect on q100

x times

1.25234

E�ect of NAO, MO and WEMO on the 100-years return period event

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 42 / 52

Page 49: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Results: event's magnitude, autumn

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

NAO effect on q100

x times

1.25234

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

MO effect on q100

x times

1.25234

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

WEMO effect on q100

x times

1.25234

E�ect of NAO, MO and WEMO on the 100-years return period event

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 43 / 52

Page 50: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Results: threshold independence, I

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

2030

4050

60

u

Mea

n E

xces

s

Threshold (u = q0.85 = 16.945, n = 345)

50 100 150 200 250 300

Intensity (mm day−1)Intensity (mm)Intensity (days)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

Stationary model (AIC=2766)

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

2025

3035

4045

50

u

Mea

n E

xces

s

Threshold (u = q0.9 = 23.5, n = 229)

50 100 150 200 250

Intensity (mm day−1)Intensity (mm)Intensity (days)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

Stationary model (AIC=1875)

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

2030

4050

60

u

Mea

n E

xces

s

Threshold (u = q0.95 = 36.1, n = 113)

50 100 150 200 250

Intensity (mm day−1)Intensity (mm)Intensity (days)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

Stationary model (AIC=994)

●●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

Quantile plots for rainfall intensity in Valencia, thresholds at u=q85, u=q90 and u=q95

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 44 / 52

Page 51: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Results: threshold independence, II

−2 −1 0 1 2

NAOi (AIC=2695*)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

20

30

40

50 60

70 80

90 100

110 120

130

140 150

160 170

180

−2 −1 0 1 2

WEMOi (AIC=2476*)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

Intensity, non−stationary model

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90 100 110

120 130

140 150

160 170 180 190

200 210

−2 −1 0 1 2

MOi (AIC=2609*)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

20

30

40

50 60

70 80

90 100

110 120

130

140

150

160

170 180

−2 −1 0 1 2

NAOi (AIC=1817*)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

30

40

50

60 70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150 160

170 180 190

200

−2 −1 0 1 2

WEMOi (AIC=1569*)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

Intensity, non−stationary model

30 40

50

60 70

80 90 100

110 120

130

140 150

160 170

180 190

200 210

−2 −1 0 1 2

MOi (AIC=1831*)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

30

40

50 60

70

80 90

100

110 120

130 140

150 160 170 180

190 200

−2 −1 0 1 2

NAOi (AIC=1033)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

40

50

60 70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170 180

190 200

210 220

230 240 250

−2 −1 0 1 2

WEMOi (AIC=953*)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

Intensity, non−stationary model

40

60

80

100

120

140

160 180

200 220 240

260 280

300

−2 −1 0 1 2

MOi (AIC=1046)

Ret

urn

perio

d (y

ears

)

12

510

2550

100

40

50

60 70

80

90

100

110 120

130

140 150

160

170 180

190 200 210

220 230 240

Quantile plots for rainfall intensity in Valencia, thresholds at u=q85, u=q90 and u=q95

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 45 / 52

Page 52: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Results: threshold independence, III

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

NAO effect on q100

x times

1.25234

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

MO effect on q100

x times

1.25234

0e+00 2e+05 4e+05 6e+05 8e+05 1e+06

4000

000

4200

000

4400

000

4600

000

4800

000

WEMO effect on q100

x times

1.25234

E�ect of WEMO in rainfall magnitude, thresholds at u=q85, u=q90 and u=q95

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 46 / 52

Page 53: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Projected evolution of NAOi, MOi and WEMOi

NA

Oi

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

−0.

20.

00.

10.

2

NA

Oi

2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100−

0.4

0.0

0.2

0.4

MO

i1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

−0.

3−

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.3

MO

i

2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100

−0.

20.

00.

20.

4

WE

MO

i

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

−0.

3−

0.1

0.1

0.2

WE

MO

i

2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100

−0.

4−

0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

Time variation of NAOi, MOi and WEMOi in the 21th Century, INMCM3.0 model output, 48-months convolution

(envelope of SRES A1b, A2 and B1 scenarios)

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 47 / 52

Page 54: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Conclusions and future work I

NSPOT analysis is good at capturing the relationship betweenextreme precipitation processes and atmospheric circulation indices.

The results are promising for a variety of applications, includingshort-term warning systems and the statistical downscaling ofGCM/RCM outputs.

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 48 / 52

Page 55: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Conclusions and future work II

Clustering methods based on the series of covariates (and not on P).

Other covariates: synoptic scale air�ow parameters (direction,strength, vorticity), speci�c humidity, etc.

Multi-covariate analysis.

Spatial model: take advantage of spatial dependence to reduceuncertainty.

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 49 / 52

Page 56: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

References I

Smith RL. Extreme value analysis of environmental time series: an application to trend detection inground-level ozone. Statistical Science 4: 367�393 (1989).

Katz RW. Extreme value theory for precipitation: sensitivity analysis for climate change. Adv. Water Resour.23: 133�139 (1999).

Smith RL. Trends in rainfall extremes. Unpublished paper, available at http://www.stat.unc.edu/ (1999).

Hall P, Tajvidi N. Non-parametric analysis of temporal trend when �tting parametric models toextreme-value data. Stat. Science 15: 153�167 (2000).

Coles S. An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values. Springer-Verlag: London (2001).

Palutikof J.P. Analysis of Mediterranean climate data: measured and modelled. In: Bolle H.J. (ed):Mediterranean climate: Variability and trends. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2003)

Li Y, Cai W, Campbell EP. Statistical modeling of extreme rainfall in southwest Western Australia. J. Clim.18: 852�863 (2005).

Martín-Vide J., López-Bustins J.-A. The Western Mediterranean Oscillation and rainfall in the IberianPeninsula. Int. J. Climatol. 26: 1455�1475 (2006).

Nogaj M, Yioui P, Parey S, Malek F, Naveau P. Amplitude and frequency of temperature extremes over theNorth Atlantic region. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33: L10801 (2006).

Laurent C, Parey S. Estimation of 100-year return-period temperatures in France in a non-stationary climate:results from observations and IPCC scenarios. Global and Planetary Change 57: 177�188 (2007).

Parey S, Malek F, Laurent C, Dacunha-Castelle D. Trends and climate evolution: statistical approach forvery high temperatures in France. Climatic Change 81: 331�352 (2007).

Méndez FJ, Menéndez M, Luceño A, Losada IJ. Estimation of the long-term variability of extreme signi�cantwave height using a time-dependent Peak Over Threshold (POT) model. Journal of Geophysical Research C:Oceans 111: C07024 (2006).

Yiou P, Ribereau P, Naveau P, Nogaj M, Brazdil R. Statistical analysis of �oods in Bohemia (CzechRepublic) since 1825. Hydrological Sciences Journal 51: 930�945 (2006).

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 50 / 52

Page 57: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

References II

Abaurrea J, Asín J, Cebrián AC, Centelles A. Modeling and forecasting extreme hot events in the centralEbro valley, a continental-Mediterranean area. Global and Planetary Change 57: 43�58 (2007).

Angulo et al. (2011)

Beguería S, Angulo-Martínez M, Vicente-Serrano S, López-Moreno JI, El-Kenawy A. Assessing trends inextreme precipitation events intensity and magnitude using non-stationary peaks-over-threshold analysis: acase study in northeast Spain from 1930 to 2006. International Journal of Climatology 31: 2102�2114(2011).

Acero FJ, García JA, Gallego MC. Peaks-over-Threshold Study of Trends in Extreme Rainfall over theIberian Peninsula. Journal of Climate 24: 1089�1105 (2011).

Friederichs P. Statistical downscaling of extreme precipitation events using extreme value theory. Extremes13: 109�132 (2010).

Kallache M, Vrac M, Naveau P, Michelangeli P-A. Non-stationary probabilistic downscaling of extremeprecipitation. Journal of Geophysical Research 116, D05113 (2011).

Tramblay Y, Neppel L, Carreau J, Sánchez-Gómez E. Extreme value modelling of daily areal rainfall overMediterranean catchments in a changing climate. Hydrological Processes, DOI: 10.1002/hyp.8417 (2012).

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 51 / 52

Page 58: Santiágo Beguería: Covariate-dependent modeling of extreme events by non-stationary Peaks Over Threshold analysis

Thank you!

[email protected]

([email protected]) NSPOT with covariates Liberec, 17/02/2012 52 / 52