59
Experimental Real-time Seasonal Hydrologic Forecasting Andrew Wood Dennis Lettenmaier University of Washington Arun Kumar NCEP/EMC/CMB presented: JISAO weekly seminar Seattle, WA Nov 13, 2001

Presentation

  • Upload
    garry54

  • View
    594

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Presentation

Experimental Real-time Seasonal Hydrologic Forecasting

Andrew WoodDennis Lettenmaier

University of Washington

Arun KumarNCEP/EMC/CMB

presented:

JISAO weekly seminarSeattle, WA Nov 13, 2001

Page 2: Presentation

Overview

Research Objective:

To produce monthly to seasonal snowpack, streamflow, runoff & soil moisture forecasts for continental scale river basins

Underlying rationale/motivation:

1.Global numerical weather prediction / climate models (e.g. GSM) take advantage of SST – atmosphere teleconnections

2.Hydrologic models add soil-moisture – streamflow influence (persistence)

Page 3: Presentation

Topics Today

1. Approach2. Columbia River basin (summer 2001) application3. East Coast (summer 2000) application4. Related work5. Comments

Page 4: Presentation

climate model forecastmeteorological outputs

• ~1.9 degree resolution (T62)• monthly total P, avg T

Use 3 step approach: 1) statistical bias correction 2) downscaling3) hydrologic simulation

General Approach

hydrologic model inputs

streamflow, soil moisture,snowpack,runoff• 1/8-1/4 degree resolution

• daily P, Tmin, Tmax

Page 5: Presentation

Models: Global Spectral Model (GSM) ensemble forecasts from NCEP/EMC

• forecast ensembles available near beginning of each month, extend 6 months beginning in following month

• each month:• 210 ensemble members define GSM climatology for

monthly Ptot & Tavg• 20 ensemble members define GSM forecast

Page 6: Presentation

Models: VIC Hydrologic Model

Page 7: Presentation

domain slide

Example Flow Routing Network

Page 8: Presentation

One Way Coupling of GSM and VIC models

a) bias correction: climate model climatology observed climatologyb) spatial interpolation:

GSM (1.8-1.9 deg.) VIC (1/8 deg)c) temporal disaggregation (via resampling of observed patterns):

monthly daily

a. b. c.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 1Probability

Te

mp

era

ture

TGSM

TOBS

Page 9: Presentation

GSM Regional Bias:a spatial example

Bias is removed at the monthly GSM-scale from the meteorological forecasts

(so 3rd column ~= 1st column)

Page 10: Presentation

GSM Regional Bias:

one cell example

For sample cell located over Ohio River basin, biases in monthly Ptot & Tavg are significant!

Page 11: Presentation

GSM Regional Bias:

one cell example

Page 12: Presentation

Bias: Developing a Correction

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

20 member forecast ensemble

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

from 1979 SSTsfrom 1980 SSTs

from 1981 SSTs

from 1999 SSTs

from current SSTs

(21 sets)10 member climatology ensembles

Page 13: Presentation

Bias: Developing a Correction

10

15

20

25

30

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

percentile (wrt 1979-99)

deg

C

GSM

Observed

July Tavg, for 1 GSM cell

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

1979 SSTsetc.

from 1999SSTs

10 member climatology ens.

* for each month, each GSM grid cell and variable

*

Page 14: Presentation

Bias: Applying a Correction

Note: we apply correction to both forecast ensembleand climatology ensemble itself, for later use

Page 15: Presentation

Bias-Correction: Spatial Perspective

shown1 month,

1 variable (T),1 ens-member

raw GSM output

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

bias-corrected

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

Page 16: Presentation

Bias: Spatial Perspectiveexpress as anomaly

-8

-4

0

4

8

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

bias-corrected

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

Page 17: Presentation

Downscaling: step 1 is interpolation(bias corrected) anomaly anomaly at VIC scale

-8

-4

0

4

8

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

-8

-4

0

4

8

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

Page 18: Presentation

Downscaling: step 2 adds spatial VIC-scale variability to smooth anomaly field

mean fields

anomaly

note:month m, m = 1-6ens e, e = 1-20

VIC-scale monthly forecast

Page 19: Presentation

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon1

Mon2

Mon3

Mon4

Mon5

Mon6

de

g C

Lastly, temporal disaggregation…

VIC-scale monthly forecast

Page 20: Presentation

Lastly, temporal disaggregation…

VIC-scale monthly forecast

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon1

Mon2

Mon3

Mon4

Mon5

Mon6

deg

C

Page 21: Presentation

Downscaling Test

1. Start with GSM-scale monthly observed met data for 21 years

2. Downscale into a daily VIC-scale timeseries

3. Force hydrology model to produce streamflow

4. Is observed streamflow reproduced?

Page 22: Presentation

GSM forecast and climatology ensembles

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

20 member forecast ensemble

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

from 1979 SSTsfrom 1980 SSTs

from 1981 SSTs

from 1999 SSTs

from current SSTs

(21 sets)10 member climatology ensembles

Page 23: Presentation

GSM climatology: use #2

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

sample: 21 member climatology ensemble

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

from 1979 SSTsetc.

from 1999SSTs

10 member climatology ens. (21 sets)

Page 24: Presentation

GSM climatology: use #2

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

sample: 21 member climatology ensemble

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

from 1979 SSTsetc.

from 1999SSTs

10 member climatology ens. (21 sets)

-5

5

15

25

35

Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6

deg

C

20 member forecast ens.

Page 25: Presentation

Simulations

Forecast Productsstreamflow soil moisture

runoffsnowpack

VIC model spin-upVIC forecast ensemble

climate forecast

information (from GSM)

VIC climatology ensemble

1-2 years back start of month 0 end of month 6

NCDC met. station obs. up to

2-4 months from

current

LDAS/other met.

forcings for remaining

spin-up

data sources

A B C

Page 26: Presentation

Columbia River Application

Page 27: Presentation

CRB

Initial Conditions

late-May SWE &water balance

Page 28: Presentation

CRB

Initial Conditions

(percentiles)

Page 29: Presentation

CRB: May forecastobservedforecast

forecastmedians

Page 30: Presentation

CRB: May forecast

hindcast“observed”

forecast

forecast medians

Page 31: Presentation

CRB May forecasthindcast “observed”forecast

forecastmedians

Page 32: Presentation

CRB May forecast

basin avg. soil moisture

Page 33: Presentation

CRB May Forecast

Streamflow

Page 34: Presentation

Forecasts of Columbia River Flow @ The Dalles, 2001

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

450000

500000

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

cfs

Mar fcast

Mar clim

Apr fcast

Apr clim

May fcast

May clim

Hindcast

CRB: sequential streamflow forecasts

hindcast

climatologies

forecasts

ensemble medians

Page 35: Presentation

CRBMay Forecast

cumulative flow averages

forecastmedians

Page 36: Presentation

East Coast Application

Page 37: Presentation

Model forecasting domain

Page 38: Presentation

East Coast spin-up period

Page 39: Presentation

East Coast spin-up period

Page 40: Presentation

East Coast spin-up period

Page 41: Presentation

East Coast spin-up period

Page 42: Presentation

East Coast hindcast

Page 43: Presentation

East Coast hindcast

Page 44: Presentation

East Coast hindcast

Page 45: Presentation

East Coast hindcast

Page 46: Presentation

East Coast

Apr ’00 forecast for May-Jun-Jul

forecast median shown as percentile of climatology ensemble

Page 47: Presentation

East Coast

May ’00 forecast for Jun-Jul-Aug

Page 48: Presentation

East Coast

Jun ’00 forecast for Jul-Aug-Sep

Page 49: Presentation
Page 50: Presentation

ENSO extreme pseudo-forecast evaluation

perfect-SST forecasts from Nov. 97

Page 51: Presentation

Related Applications

Page 52: Presentation

Related: Yakima R. Mesocale Model Downscaling (RCM @ ½ to VIC @ 1/8)

Page 53: Presentation

Related:

PCM-based climate change scenarios

Page 54: Presentation

Related:

PCM-based climate change scenarios

Page 55: Presentation

Related:

PCM-based climate change scenarios

Page 56: Presentation

Related:PCM-based climate change scenarios

Page 57: Presentation

Summary Comments climate-hydrology forecast model system has potential

can also try other ensemble forecast models/methods can also try other bias-correction/downscaling approaches

critical needs access to quality met data during spinup period ability to demonstrate / assess skill quantitatively

perfect-SST (“AMIP-type”) hindcast ensembles a start, but really need a long term retrospective forecast set

Page 58: Presentation

Summary Comments climate-hydrology forecast model system has potential

can also try other ensemble forecast models/methods can also try other bias-correction/downscaling approaches

critical needs access to quality met data during spinup period ability to demonstrate / assess skill quantitatively

perfect-SST (“AMIP-type”) hindcast ensembles a start, but really need a long term retrospective forecast set

2 of me: one for research one for “operations”

Page 59: Presentation

END