40
ENGLISH LANGUAGE PARLIAMENTARY STYLE DEBATE CLINIC Dr. Sivabala Naidu

Parliamentary style debate

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Parliamentary style debate

ENGLISH LANGUAGE PARLIAMENTARY STYLE

DEBATE CLINIC

Dr. Sivabala Naidu

Page 2: Parliamentary style debate

COMPLETE THIS STATEMENT:

A DEBATE IS ………………………...

Metaphor

Page 3: Parliamentary style debate

What is a debate

Page 4: Parliamentary style debate

A debate is an argument

Page 5: Parliamentary style debate

CONCEPT: THE TOPIC

There must be something to argue about. This is called the TOPIC. They can be about current issues OR about

general ideas.

Page 6: Parliamentary style debate

As in other arguments there are two sides to any topic.

The team that agrees with the topic is called the AFFIRMATIVE (or the `government' )

the team that disagrees with the topic is called the NEGATIVE (or the `opposition' )

Page 7: Parliamentary style debate

CONCEPT: DEFINITION

Deciding and explaining what a topic means is called `defining the topic'.

The job of defining begins with the AFFIRMATIVE.

The first speaker of the affirmative must explain CLEARLY what they believe the topic means.

Page 8: Parliamentary style debate

When you define ask yourselves:

Is this definition reasonable ? Is it something the average person might

expect ? Does it allow for both sides of the debate ?“

Page 9: Parliamentary style debate

DEFINITION

The negative team may agree with or choose to challenge the definition presented.

Challenges may be made if the definition given is unreasonable

Page 10: Parliamentary style debate

DEFINITION

If the negative team chooses to challenge the definition it should be done by the first speaker.

He/She should clearly outline why the negative is challenging and then propose a better definition.

Page 11: Parliamentary style debate

CONCEPT: CASELINE

The case line is the basic statement of "why the topic is true" (for the affirmative) and "why the topic is false" (for the negative).

It should be a short sentence, presented by the first speaker of each team.

Page 12: Parliamentary style debate

ROLES OF THE SPEAKERS

1st Affirmative must:- define the topic.- present the affirmative's team line.- outline briefly what each speaker in their

team will talk about.- present the first half of the affirmative case.

Page 13: Parliamentary style debate

1st negative must:accept or reject the definition. present the negative CASELINE.outline briefly what each of the negative

speakers will say.rebut the points of the first affirmative.present the first point.

Page 14: Parliamentary style debate

2ND SPEAKERS

Rebut the main points presented by the FIRST speakers.

Present the second half of the case.

Page 15: Parliamentary style debate

3rd SPEAKERS

Rebut all the points.Present a summary of the case.Reaffirm Neither third speaker may introduce any new

points.

Page 16: Parliamentary style debate

CONCEPT: REBUTTAL

1. Logic - to say that the other side is wrong is not enough. You have to show why the other side is wrong. This is best done by taking a main point of the other side's argument and showing that it does not make sense. Because a lot of the thinking for this needs to be done quickly this is one of the most challenging and enjoyable aspects of debating.

Page 17: Parliamentary style debate

2. Pick the important points - try to rebut the most important points of the other side's case.

3. `Play the ball' - do not criticise the individual speakers, criticise what they say. To call someone fat, ugly or a nerd does not make what they say wrong and it will also lose you marks.

Page 18: Parliamentary style debate

CONCEPT: MATTER

Matter is what you say, it is the substance of your speech.

You should divide your matter into arguments and examples.

Page 19: Parliamentary style debate

CONCEPT: ARGUMENT

An argument is a statement "The topic is true OR false because of x", where the argument fills in for the x .

For example in the topic “Zoos should be closed" an argument may be: "zoos should be closed because they confine the animals in an unnatural environment".

Page 20: Parliamentary style debate

CONCEPT: EXAMPLES

An example is a fact or piece of evidence which supports an argument

“That in the lion cage at Taronga Park Zoo in Sydney the animals only have about 200 square metres. In the wild they would have 2000 square kilometres to roam in.”

Any examples that you use should be relevant to the topic at hand.

Page 21: Parliamentary style debate

CONCEPT: MATTER

Matter cannot be just a long list of examples. You do not win a debate by creating the biggest pile of facts.

Facts are like bricks in a wall, if you don't use them, cement them together properly then they are useless.

Page 22: Parliamentary style debate

CONCEPT: MATTER

Many debates are on currently important issues so it is good for any debater keep yourselves informed of what is happening in the world around you and what are the issues involved.

Page 23: Parliamentary style debate

CONCEPT: METHOD

Method is how you organise what you say.

Page 24: Parliamentary style debate

METHOD: TEAM

1. Good team method involves unity and logic. Unity is created by all members being aware of the definition, what the other speakers have said and what the case line is.

Each member of the team needs to reinforce the case line and be consistent with what has already been said and what will be said by the other members of their team.

Page 25: Parliamentary style debate

METHOD: INDIVIDUAL

You must structure your speech well. The first step is to have a clear idea of your own arguments and which examples you will be using to support those arguments.

Make a clear division between arguments and let the audience know when you are moving from one argument to the next, this is called sign posting and is a very important debating tool.

Page 26: Parliamentary style debate

Although you know exactly what you are saying the audience has never heard it before and will only hear it once so you have to be very clear about it.

When you are presenting one particular argument make sure that the argument is logical and that you make clear links between your case line and the argument, and between the argument and the examples.

Page 27: Parliamentary style debate

METHOD: REBUTTAL

Attack each argument that the opposition presents in turn. Spend a little while on each and then move on to the next. That way the other team's case is completely demolished.

Also organise your speech well in terms of time. Don’t spend too long on one point and then have to rush through all your other points and rebuttals.

Page 28: Parliamentary style debate

CONCEPT: MANNER

Manner is how you present what you say.There are various aspects of manner that you

need to be aware of. The best advice you can get is to develop a

manner style that is natural to you.

Page 29: Parliamentary style debate

CUE CARDS

Do not write out your speech on cue cards. There is even a current, and indeed

deplorable, trend towards computer generated cue cards.

Page 30: Parliamentary style debate

EYE CONTACT

Very closely related to cue cards.If you look at the audience you will hold their

attention. If you spend your time reading from cue

cards or looking at a point just above the audience's head they will lose concentration very quickly.

Page 31: Parliamentary style debate

VOICE

There are many things you can do with your voice to make it effective.

Use volume, pitch and speed to emphasise important points in your speech.

A sudden loud burst will grab your audience's attention while quiet speaking can make your audience listen carefully.

Page 32: Parliamentary style debate

BODY

Your body is a tool for you to use. Make hand gestures deliberately and with

confidence.Stand with confidence.

Page 33: Parliamentary style debate

NERVOUS HABITS

Playing with your cue cards, pulling on a stray strand of hair, fiddling with your watch, bouncing up and down on the balls of your feet, etc.

Use ready-made fillers such as Madam speaker or Ladies and Gentlemen.

Page 34: Parliamentary style debate

STRATEGIES FOR EFFECTIVE DEBATING

NEEDS-PLANS-BENEFITS (AFFIRMATIVE)Begin by highlighting a problem with the

current situation.Then, propose a plan (the topic) that can deal

with the situation.Finally state the benefits.

Page 35: Parliamentary style debate

COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE CASERevise current situation To improve results

Page 36: Parliamentary style debate

THE GOALS CASEDefine the goals of the current systemExplain why the current system cannot

achieve the goalsOffer a new plan to meet the goalsSay why it is better able to meet the goals

Page 37: Parliamentary style debate

OPPOSITION STRATEGY

The best strategy is oppose everything.Argue:1.That the status quo is acceptable.2.The affirmative is misdiagnosing the problem3.The proposed solution is flawed or

unworkable4.The proposed benefits won’t materialise5.Provide a counter-plan

Page 38: Parliamentary style debate

CONCEPT: REFUTATION

Contradict evidence Discredit plan by questioning viability, cost

and possible harmsDemonstrate shortcomings in logic

Page 39: Parliamentary style debate

SOME POINTERS

When presenting a point use three-steps1.State the point2.Explain the statement3.Provide evidence

Page 40: Parliamentary style debate

LAST WORDS

Check the PA systemCheck where the judges/time keepers are

sittingAddress the speaker