53
Learning from German Planning: Goals, Regulations and Ideas for the U.S. CNU XVII June 10, 2009 Faith Cable Smith Partners [email protected]

OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Learning from German Planning: Goals, Regulations and Ideas for the U.S.  This presentation provides an overview of the German system of planning and suggestions for American zoning reform based off of the "B-plan" which is a type of regulating plan used throughout Germany.

Citation preview

Page 1: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Learning from German Planning: Goals, Regulations and Ideas for the U.S.

CNU XVII June 10, 2009

Faith Cable Smith Partners

[email protected]

Page 2: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Overview • Similar Goals and Rating Systems:

LEED­ND & the German Assessment Matrix

• German Planning Regulations National, State & Local

• The German B­plan

• Comparing Regulating Plans – Ideas for the U.S. PUDs Form­Based Codes

Page 3: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Similar Goals and Neighborhood Rating Systems

LEED­ND (U.S.) & the Assessment Matrix (Germany)

Page 4: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Rating System Categories

• Smart Location & Linkage (SLL: 30 points)

• Neighborhood Pattern & Design (NPD: 39 points)

• Green Construction & Technology (GCT: 31 points)

• Innovation & Design Process (IDP: 6 points)

• Mobility/Location/Reachability (30%)

• Emissions (10%) • Microclimate (5%) • Use of Ground & Area (20%) • Nature: Flora & Fauna (15%) • Water (10%) • Energy (5%) • Townscape Scenery (5%)

LEED­ND Assessment Matrix

Page 5: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Comparison Categories

1. Location and Previous Use 2. Transportation and Reachability 3. Walkable Neighborhoods 4. Social Issues 5. Protecting Nature 6. Building Green 7. Minimizing Pollution

Page 6: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

LOCATION

Best: Previously Developed + Infill Site + High Street Centerline Density Worst: Not Previously Developed + Not Adjacent or Infill Site + Low Street Centerline Density

Best: In a neighborhood center Ok: 15­30 minutes by transit or bicycle to a neighborhood center Worst: distant from a neighborhood center (30+ minutes)

LEED­ND Assessment Matrix

Source: Google earth

Page 7: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Credit given for number of total transit rides per weekday within a ¼ mile/400 m. (bus & tram) walk or ½ mile/800 m. (heavy rail) walk: Best: 500+ Rides Worst: 20­59 Rides

Transit graded by comparison with auto travel, considering: ­ type of transit ­ frequency ­ proximity to the station or stop ­ other stops along the line ­ regional connections

LEED­ND Assessment Matrix

TRANSIT

Page 8: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Bicycle network must connect 50% of buildings to 4 diverse uses within 3 miles (4800 meters) + Bicycle parking = 15% of car parking

Best: Smooth ground, safe traffic, connections between neighborhoods, reaches destinations Ok: Moderate accommodation, no hazards Worst: High traffic, no bike lanes, bad connections to destinations

LEED­ND Assessment Matrix

Source: City of Berlin FIS

BICYCLING

Page 9: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Credit given for number of diverse uses that are within a ½ mile (800 meter) walk Best: 10 Diverse Uses (+4) Worst: 2 Diverse Uses (+1)

Supply of daily needed goods: Best: are within walking distance Ok: are reachable by bicycle or transit in 10 minutes Worst: are further away and easier to reach by auto

LEED­ND Assessment Matrix

Groceries

Convenience Store

Post Office

Laundry/Dry Cleaner

Hair Care

Pharmacy

DAILY NEEDED GOODS / DIVERSE USES

Page 10: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Residential Density: Best: 71+ DU/acre (+7) Worst: min. 7 DU/acre (+1)

Non­Residential Density: Best: >3.5 FAR (+7) Worst: 0.75 to 1.0 FAR (+1)

Residential Density: Best: Lot Coverage: 0,6 & FAR: 1,8+ Worst: Lot Coverage: 0,1 & FAR: 0,1­0,2

Mixed­use Density: Best: Lot Coverage: 0,8 and FAR: 2,4+ Worst: Lot Coverage: 0,5 and FAR: 1,5<

LEED­ND Assessment Matrix

+1 / 7

12.5 DU/acre 21.8 DU/acre 35.0 DU/acre

+2 / 7 +3 / 7 (3,0) (2,7) (2,1)

DENSITY

Page 11: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

TRANSPORTATION & REACHABILITY

• Reachability = Mobility + Access (Erreichbarkeit)

• Assessment Matrix Standard – Measurement: time­distance

• Reachable within 15 minutes? – By eco­mobility: transit, bicycling

& walking – & competitive with auto travel!

Page 12: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

­ building entries on the street ­ minimum 1:3 building­height­ to­street­width ratio ­ continuous sidewalks ­ traffic speed: 20­ 25 mph

­ building setback 0­25 feet ­ ground floor retail ­ frequent building entries ­ no blank walls ­ ground level windows ­ on­street parking ­ street trees ­ shaded sidewalks

LEED­ND

WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN

Page 13: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

German Planning Regulations & Process

National State/Regional Municipal

Page 14: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

At the National (Bund) Level • Federal Ministry of Transport, Building

and Urban Affairs – National Spatial Planning Law outlines framework, goals, principles and procedures

– Baugesetzbuch or “BauGB” establishes national regulations for local land use planning and development • Building/Land Use Regulations • Plan Drawing Requirements • Regulation on Determination of Value • Spatial Planning Laws

Page 15: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

At the State (Land) Level • The State Spatial Planning Acts

specifics spatial development goals and sets boarders between densely populated areas and open space.

• The Regional Plan coordinates development with the provision of transportation and other public infrastructure.

Page 16: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

At the Municipality (Stadt) Level • Flächennutzungsplan (F­plan): A Comprehensive/Zoning

Land Use Plan for a municipality over 10­15 years that is approved by the regional government. – It is binding for public agencies

– No basis for private compensation claims

Page 17: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Land Use Plan (F­plan), Freiburg, Germany

Page 18: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

At the Municipality (Stadt) Level • Bebauungsplan (B­Plan): A Regulating Plan or “legally

binding land­use plan” provides the basis for the detailed and legally binding control of building development. – Derived from the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (F­Plan). – Can be prepared by a municipality in advance of development or from a developer’s plan

– Serves as a plat map.

Page 19: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

The German B­Plan

Page 20: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Hamburg: Hafen City

+

Page 21: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Hamburg: Hafen City

Page 22: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Hamburg: Hafen City

Page 23: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Freiburg: Rieselfeld

Page 24: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Freiburg: Rieselfeld

Page 25: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Zoning Process – American Comparisons

1. Zoning Map ­ Commercial* ­ Residential* ­ Industrial* ­ PUD

2. PUD Master Plan (or site plan)

American Standard Form­Based

1. Regulating plan ­ Transects* ­ Use Zones* ­ Frontage type ­ Street type

1. B­plan 1.1 Use Zones

(Mixed­Use, Residential)

1.2 Height 1.3 FAR /

# of Units 1.4 Setback 1.5 (other bulk

criteria….)

German

*Regulating criteria for height & bulk listed by use­based category

Page 26: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

B­plan Requirements Requirements for a Qualified B­Plan

1. Local traffic areas 2. Type of building use 3. Degree of building use and

amount of land to be built on 4. Text requirements

Page 27: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

B­plan Requirements: (1) Streets

1. Local Traffic Areas. This may include sidewalks, bicycle lanes and other parts of the public right of way.

Page 28: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

B­plan Requirements: (2) Use

2. The Type of Building Use: this regulates the type of building uses that are in the land use plan, such as general residential or mixed­ use area.

1. Small­scale residential (WS) 2. Exclusively residential (WR) 3. General Residential (WA) 4. Special Residential (WB) 5. Village Area (MD) 6. Mixed­Use Area (MI) 7. Town or city (MK) 8. Commercial Area (GE) 9. Industrial Area (GI) 10. Other Special (SO)

Page 29: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

1. R1 Single­family District 2. R1A Single­family District 3. R2 Two­family District 4. R2B Two­family District 5. R3 Multiple­family District 6. R4 Multiple­family District 7. R5 Multiple­family District 8. R6 Multiple­family District 9. OR1 Neighborhood Office

Residence 10. OR2 High Density Office

Residence 11. OR3 Institutional Office Residence 12. C1 Neighborhood Commercial 13. C2 Neighborhood Corridor

Commercial 14. C3A Community Activity Center 15. C3S Community Shopping Center 16. C4 General Commercial 17. B4 Downtown Business 18. B4S Downtown Service 19. B4C Downtown Commercial 20. I1 Light Industrial 21. I2 Medium Industrial 22. I3 General Industrial

Minneapolis Overlay Districts 1. PO Pedestrian Oriented 2. LH Linden Hills 3. IL Industrial Living 4. TP Transitional Parking 5. SH Shoreland 6. FP Floodplain 7. MR Mississippi River Critical

Area 8. DP Downtown Parking 9. B4H Downtown Housing 10. DH Downtown Height 11. NM Nicollet Mall 12. HA Harmon Area 13. NP North Phillips

1. Small­scale residential (WS) 2. Exclusively residential (WR) 3. General Residential (WA) 4. Special Residential (WB) 5. Village Area (MD) 6. Mixed­Use Area (MI) 7. Town or city (MK) 8. Commercial Area (GE) 9. Industrial Area (GI) 10. Other Special (SO)

German Cities

Page 30: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

1. Single­Family Residential R­1 2. Single­Family Residential R­1A 3. Large Lot Single­Family RS­1 4. Multiple­Family Residential R­4 5. Multiple­Family Residential RM­12 6. Multiple­Family Residential RM­24 7. Multiple­Family Residential RM­50 8. Neighborhood Office B­1 9. General Commercial B­2 10. General Business B­3 11. Neighborhood Commercial Center B­4 12. Central Business CB 13. Freeway Office and Service C­1 14. Freeway Commercial C­2 15. Freeway Commercial Center C­3 16. Freeway Office C­4 17. Freeway Mixed Use C­5 18. Regional Commercial CR­1 19. Industrial Park I­1 20. Limited Industry I­2 21. General Industry I­3 22. Industrial Park IP 23. Mixed Use CX­2 24. High Intensity Mixed Use HX­2 25. High Intensity Mixed Use With

Residential HX­R

Bloomington, MN 26. Commercial Service CS­0.5 27. Commercial Service CS­1 28. Commercial Office CO­0.5 29. Commercial Office CO­1 30. Commercial Office/Mixed Use

CO­2 31. Residential Office RO­24 32. Residential Office RO­50 33. Conservation SC District 34. Freeway Development FD­1 35. Freeway Development FD­2

Overlay Districts. 1. Planned Development PD

Overlay 2. Flood Hazard FH Overlay 3. Bluff Protection BP­1 Overlay 4. Bluff Development BP­2

Overlay 5. Airport Runway (AR­17)

Overlay 6. Airport Runway (AR­22)

Overlay

1. Small­scale residential (WS) 2. Exclusively residential (WR) 3. General Residential (WA) 4. Special Residential (WB) 5. Village Area (MD) 6. Mixed­Use Area (MI) 7. Town or city (MK) 8. Commercial Area (GE) 9. Industrial Area (GI) 10. Other Special (SO)

German Cities

Page 31: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

B­plan Requirements: (2) Use 2. The Type of Building

Use: this regulates the type of building uses that are in the land use plan, such as general residential or mixed­ use area.

1. Small­scale residential (WS) 2. Exclusively residential (WR) 3. General Residential (WA) 4. Special Residential (WB) 5. Village Area (MD) 6. Mixed­Use Area (MI) 7. Town or city (MK) 8. Commercial Area (GE) 9. Industrial Area (GI) 10. Other Special (SO)

Page 32: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

B­plan Requirements: (2) Use Restricted Residential (Reine Wohngebiete)

By Right: residential buildings

Conditional: retail & restaurants that serve the daily needs of residents; workshops; small hotels; religious, cultural, health, sports facilities

Page 33: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

B­plan Requirements: (2) Use General Residential (Allgemeine Wohngebiete)

By Right: residential buildings; retail & restaurants that serve the daily needs of residents; workshops; small hotels; religious, cultural, health, sports facilities

Conditional: hotels, non­ disturbing industry, gas stations, office buildings

Page 34: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

B­plan Requirements: (2) Use Mixed Use (Mischgebiet)

By Right: residential buildings; office buildings, retail, restaurants and hotels; workshops and non disturbing industry; religious, cultural, health, sports facilities

Conditional: n/a

* A mix of uses is required

Page 35: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

B­plan Requirements: (3) Form 3. The Degree (Extent/Amount) of Building Use and

Amount of Land to Be Built On

Height/Bulk: – Number of stories (roman #) – Lot coverage ratio (“GRZ”) – Floor area ratio (“GFZ”) or the maximum number of units per building (2 “WO”)

– Construction: open or closed (“o”/ “g” ) – Roof specifications (pitch)

Open

Closed

Page 36: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

B­plan Requirements: (3) Form 3. The Degree (Extent/Amount) of Building Use and

Amount of Land to Be Built On Lines: – Build­within lines (blue) – Build­to lines (red) – Property lines – Traffic lines

Other: – Wall height (“WH” 5,20 m) – Set back areas – Rules for parking and development

– Character of the nearby environment

– Window placement

Page 37: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

B­plans: How do you read one? 1. Build­within line (blue) 2. Build­to line (red) 3. Property line 4. Plot number 5. Type of building use 6. Number of full stories 7. Lot coverage ratio 8. Floor area ratio 9. Construction 10. Roof pitch 11. Border of the B­plan

Page 38: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Adding Up the B­plans

City of Munich B­plans

Page 39: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Berlin: The B­Plan: in GIS!

Page 40: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

The B­Plan Link

Page 41: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

The B­Plan

Page 42: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Comparing Regulating Plans – Ideas for the U.S.

Page 43: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Lessons from the German B­plan

• PUDs → Fixing Administrative Challenges

• Form Based Codes → Design First, Codify Second → Decouple Use & Form

Page 44: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

The PUD District: Regulation by Master Development Plan

Purpose of a PUD: • FLEXIBILITY • Mixed­use • Affordable housing • Environmental preservation • Cluster development • Quality design

Page 45: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

PUD Submittal Requirements for a Master Development Plan

1. Building location, height, bulk and square footage; 2. Type and square footage of specific land uses; 3. Number of dwelling units; 4. Detailed street and utility locations and sizes; 5. Drainage plan, including pipes and water storage areas; 6. Grading plan; 7. Generalized landscape plan; 8. Generalized plan for uniform signs and lighting; 9. Plan for timing and phasing of the development; 10. Covenants or other restrictions; 11. Renderings or elevations of the entrance side of buildings to be

constructed in the first phase of the development.

Source: City of Minnetonka

Page 46: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Improving PUD Administration • The B­plan: all regulations on

one plan! Easy to integrate into GIS

• Clear Graphic Standards • More flexibility for better

administration: Easier to adjust building size and bulk on a parcel level than to create a new district or recalculate a PUD

Page 47: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Similarities to Form­based Codes: Design First, Codify Second

FBCs Commonly Include: • Regulating Plan • Public Space Standards • Building Form Standards

The Village at Hendrix Collage

Page 48: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Design First, Codify Second • German B­plan

– Drawn by city planning staff; sometimes based on a developer’s plan

• Form­Based Code Regulating Plan – Usually drawn by a consultant to a city (sometimes to a

developer); – Uses a “kit of pieces”

Design Limitations in the U.S. • City planning staff typically aren’t urban designers • Codifying better design is more easily explained

by graphic standards

Page 49: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Decoupling Use and Form The Prepackaged District vs. the Assemble Yourself District

Euclidean Zoning

PUDs

Form­Based Codes SmartCode

Austin’s TOD districts

B­plan

Prepackaged

Assemble Yourself

Page 50: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Decoupling Use and Form Regulating Plan for the Lamar/Justin

TOD Station Area Plan, City of Austin (98 pages)

• Land Use & Building Density – TOD Medium Density Residential Subdistrict – TOD High Density Residential Subdistrict – TOD Live / Work Flex Subdistrict – TOD Mixed­Use Subdistrict – TOD Corridor Mixed­Use Subdistrict

• Circulation, Connectivity & Streetscape • Site Development Standards • Building Design Standards

Page 51: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Decoupling Use & Form

Land Use & Building Density

Height Circulation & Building Setbacks

Regulating Plan for the Lamar/Justin TOD Station Area Plan, City of Austin

Page 52: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

The German B­plan

Page 53: OSLO-DENVER INITIATIVE ON URBAN DESIGN AND CLIMATE CHANGE-CABLE-CNU17

Regulation for Sustainable Living • A “fine grained mix of uses”

– regulation at a pedestrian scale

• Retail serving residents’ daily needs is permitted by right

• Fixing PUDs – another generation of form­based codes?

My street in Berlin My grocery store