OECD Scoreboard 2013 Istanbul Launch

Science, Technology, Industry Scoreboard 2013

INNOVATION FOR GROWTH

Istanbul at the Global Forum on the Knowledge

Economy (GFKE)

Paris at the Committee for Industry, Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Simultaneous Release date23 October 2013

www.oecd.org/sti/scoreboard

http://www.oecd.org/sti/scoreboard

Wide-ranging resource book of indicator To inform policy making Broad scope – includes BRIICS New, experimental indicators Web book: StatLinks and additional data Visualisation online

Cc

The value of the STI Scoreboard

StatLinks and More data

StatLinks and More data

Knowledge economies – trends and features

Building knowledge

Connecting to knowledge

Targeting new growth areas

Unleashing innovation in firms

Competing in the knowledge economy

Participating in the global economy

STI Scoreboard 2013

The pace of recovery after the crisis is rather uneven across the OECD

Decomposition of growth in GDP per capita, 2007-09 and 2009-12

Total economy, annual percentage change

Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.

-10.0

-8.0

-6.0

-4.0

-2.0

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

%2007-09 2009-12

-10.0

-8.0

-6.0

-4.0

-2.0

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

%2007-09 2009-12

… and unemployment remains the most pressing challenge today

Where people lost their jobs, 2008-11


Relative contribution to change in total employment by major sectors of economic activity

Unite

d Sta

tes

Japa

nIta

ly

Franc

e

Unite

d Kin

gdom

Canad

a

Germ

any

OECDEU27

-100

-75

-50

-25

0

25

50

75

100%

Manufacturing

Construction

Job losses in Europe 2011-12


Relative contribution to change in total employment by major sectors of economic activity

Gre

ece

Portu

gal

Spain

Irelan

d

Denm

ark

EU27

United

King

dom

Sweden

Austri

a

Norway

Ger

man

y-100-75-50-25

0255075

100%

Manufacturing

Construction

Public services

…the challenge affects all

Demand in one country sustains jobs

in anotherJobs in the business sector sustained by foreign final demand, 1995 and 2008

As a percentage of total business sector employment


0

10

20

30

40

%2008 1995

and European demand is critical to European jobs

Jobs sustained by foreign final demand, by region of demand, 2008As a percentage of total jobs embodied in foreign final demand


Young, dynamic firms create more jobs than destroy, even during crisis periods …

Net job growth, younger versus older firms, 2001-11

Average over 15 countries


2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

Young firms (5 years old or less) Old firms (6 years old or more) Total%

2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6


2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6


Young firms, 5 years old or younger, generated on average nearly half of all new jobs over the past decade, despite accounting for only about 20% of total business sector jobs, excluding finance.

Net job growth, younger versus older firms, 2001-

11Average over 15 countries


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Small young Small old Medium young Medium old Large young Large old

% Employment Job destruction Job creation

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45



0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45



Patenting activity of young firms by sector, 2009-11

Share of young patenting firms and share of patents filed by young patenting firms


1 2 2 1 1 2 7 5 3 3 2 2 5 2 3 18

0

10

20

30

40

50%

High and medium-high-technology manufactures Business-sector services, excluding real estateLow and medium-low-technology manufactures Other sectorsShare of patents filed by young firms

Average number of patents filed by firms under 5 years old, 2009-11

Researchers on the move: Brain circulation results in higher scientific impact.

The 9 largest bilateral flows involve the US

International flows of scientific authors, 1996-2011Selected bilateral flows, by first and last affiliation


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

%

Total bilateral flows(x + y)

Pairs, ordered by net flow direction

Bilateral flows

05101520253035404550

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

%

Total bilateral flows(x + y)

Pairs, ordered by net flow direction

Bilateral flows

For DEU↔CHE, the lozenge show s tha t CHE ga ins 31% of to ta l b i l a tera l f low s.

Mobility patterns vary across economies

International mobility of scientific authors, 1996-2011 As a percentage of authors with two or more publications, by last reported affiliation


40

50

60

70

80

90

100%

Stayers Returnees New inflows

0040

50

60

70

80

90

100%


0040

50

60

70

80

90

100%


00

What is the impact of mobility?

Impact of scientific authors, by category of mobility, 1996-2011Based on the median source-normalized impact per paper (SNIP)


0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4Impact factor

Stayers Returnees New inflows Outflows

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4Impact factor


0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4Impact factor


0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4Impact factor


The impact of scientific production and the extent of international

scientific collaboration


Whole counts of internationally co-authored documents,2003-2011

Business R&D remains an important driver of innovation andeconomic growth.

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

% Direct government funding of BERD Indirect government support through R&D tax incentives Data on tax incentive support not available

Direct funding of business R&D and R&D tax incentives,

2010

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

% Direct government funding of BERD Indirect government support through R&D tax incentives Data on tax incentive support not available


As a percentage of GDP, 2011

Tax incentive share of government funds for R&D, 2006 and 2011


As a percentage of total support

0

20

40

60

80

100

% 2011 2006

R&D tax incentives abolished

Business R&D intensity and government support to business

R&D


Dedicated Web Page www.oecd.org/sti/rd-tax-stats.htm .

http://www.oecd.org/sti/rd-tax-stats.htm

But innovation today is more than R&D …

Product innovation, 2008-10


By R&D status

0

25

50

75

100

% Non R&D-active product innovators R&D-active product innovators

… involves investments and policies beyond R&D …

Barriers to entrepreneurship, 2008


Scale from 0 to 6 from least to most restrictive

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

IndexAdministrative burdens on start-ups Regulatory and administrative opacityBarriers to competition Barriers to entrepreneurship in 1998

Investment in physical and knowledge-based capital, 2010

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

%

Non-residential physical assets Software and databases

R&D and other intellectual property products Brand equity, firm-specific human capital, organisational capital

As a percentage of value added of the business sector


… better policies for better lives.

Public perception of the impact of science and technology on personal well-being, 2010

0

20

40

60

80

100

Strongly agree Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree Strongly disagree Don’t know

As a percentage of respondents


"Science and technology are making our lives healthier, easier and more comfortable"

Science, Technology, Industry Scoreboard 2013

INNOVATION FOR GROWTH

Send us feedbacks, THANK YOU!

Help us disseminate: www.oecd.org/sti/scoreboard

Launch @ countries

[email protected]@oecd.org

http://www.oecd.org/sti/scoreboard

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]