15
www.netfort.com Network Monitoring Trends 2014 The evolving use of network monitoring tools

Network Monitoring Trends 2014

  • Upload
    netfort

  • View
    485

  • Download
    5

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This slide deck takes a look at the results from a recent network monitoring survey carried out by NetFort. The increased use of external SAAS and cloud based services; consolidation of servers into fewer data centres is driving demand for deeper insight into bandwidth consumption, especially on critical links. However, the number of applications in use on networks today and increased use of CDNs (Content Distribution Networks) makes it very difficult to see clearly what is happening and making life very difficult for network managers. NetFort LANGuardian is deep packet inspection software for investigating, monitoring, and reporting on network activity. LANGuardian helps network administrators to: - Classify network traffic by application and by user - Troubleshoot bandwidth issues right across the network - Perform network or user forensics on past events - Investigate activity on Windows file shares, - Keep track of user activity on the Internet.

Citation preview

Page 1: Network Monitoring Trends 2014

www.netfort.com

Network Monitoring Trends 2014

The evolving use of network monitoring tools

Page 2: Network Monitoring Trends 2014

www.netfort.comSlide 2

Survey Highlights• 76% of respondents already use network

monitoring tools.• Most important feature not provided by

existing tools:– Ability to break down traffic by application and user

• Reports most often requested by management:– Information on bandwidth consumption

• 71% respondents think it is a necessity to associate network activity with usernames and not just IP addresses.

Page 3: Network Monitoring Trends 2014

www.netfort.comSlide 3

Size of network

31.37%

25.49%21.57%

13.37%7.84%

<100<500<1000<5000

Almost half of the respondents managed networks of between 100 and 1000 computers.

How many computers are you responsible for in your network?

Page 4: Network Monitoring Trends 2014

www.netfort.comSlide 4

Yes

No

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00%

76.47%

23.53%

Network monitoring tools in placeDo you have any network monitoring tools in place at the moment?

Over three-quarters of the respondents have network monitoring tools in place.

Page 5: Network Monitoring Trends 2014

www.netfort.comSlide 5

26.98%

3.17%

3.17%6.35%

3.17%4.76%3.17%3.17%

46.03%

SolarWinds WhatsUp GoldPRTG CactiMRTG Cisco PrimeSpiceworks ManageEngineOther

Network monitoring tools usedWhich monitoring tools do you use?

Majority of respondents quoted more than one tool.

Page 6: Network Monitoring Trends 2014

www.netfort.comSlide 6

Tools used to monitor NetFlow traffic

SolarWindsCacti

Cisco ToolsPRTG

NetFlowMRTGSNMP

SonicWALLMerakiOther

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20%

20.00%

11.11%

8.89%

8.89%

8.89%

6.67%

6.67%

4.44%

4.44%

20.00%

Do you monitor NetFlow traffic and bandwidth? If Yes, how do you do it?

88% of respondents monitor NetFlow traffic.

Page 7: Network Monitoring Trends 2014

www.netfort.comSlide 7

Desired NetFlow solution improvements

Ease of use

Limiting media streams for a more responsive browsing experience

Easier navigation between menus

Ease of use / more refined GUI

Better organised

Reporting

Automated reports

More robust reports

Simplified reporting access

Additional features

DDoS protection in more places

Computer speed not compromised by number of computers in useNTOP

Combined NetFlow/sFlow solution

Granular control

What improvements would you like to see in NetFlow-based solutions?

Page 8: Network Monitoring Trends 2014

www.netfort.comSlide 8

Features unavailable in current tools

27.45%

17.65%

17.65%

11.76%

11.76%

9.80% 3.92% Breakdown traffic by application and userHave more visibility on bandwidth consumptionMonitor application performanceMonitor internet activityMonitor activity by IP and usernameHave more visibility on user activ-ity and network usageMonitor file share activity

What additional network monitoring features would you like that are unavailable in current tools?

Page 9: Network Monitoring Trends 2014

www.netfort.comSlide 9

Information requested by managers

Bandw

idth c

onsum

ption

Ulilizati

on

Applica

tion p

erform

ance

When is

sues a

rise

User ac

tivity

Up tim

eOthe

r0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

Are you asked to report to your manager on network information on a regular basis? What specifically are you asked to report on?

Page 10: Network Monitoring Trends 2014

www.netfort.comSlide 10

Respondent commentsVirus sources and excessive users

Application use Up time speed

Uptime and malware Users consuming bandwidth

User activity

Network usage Bandwidth utilization Network utilization

Bandwidth consumptionApplication performance End user activity

Report to customers Manager requests reports only when issues arise

Information requested by managersAre you asked to report to your manager on network information on a regular basis? What specifically are you asked to report on?

Page 11: Network Monitoring Trends 2014

www.netfort.comSlide 11

Respondent commentsBandwidth usage by host Browsed sites

Bandwidth and usage monitoring

When issues arise

User and activity consuming bandwidth

Periodic report, general use

Up time

I would like my staff pull reports on a regular basis

Bandwidth usage and slowness

Bandwidth utilization

Utilization and NetFlow stats

Information requested by managersAre you asked to report to your manager on network information on a regular basis? What specifically are you asked to report on?

Page 12: Network Monitoring Trends 2014

www.netfort.comSlide 12

Nice to have

Necessity

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

29%

71%

Importance of usernames in reportsDo you think associating network activity, including bandwidth, traffic, Internet usage with IP address and username is a necessity or just nice to have

Page 13: Network Monitoring Trends 2014

www.netfort.comSlide 13

Respondent commentsWe can better understand true bandwidth needs if we can identify the bandwidth hogs.

Being able to not only simultaneously monitor each computer a student is on but to also be able to monitor everything they did on that computer, I feel would prevent students from going to sites (by hacking) that are not appropriate.

On several occasions I have wished I had a tool which would easily show me all the traffic coming to a particular IP, with source IP and packet contents.

IP addresses change. Associating activity with a user (or a user's system) is most helpful.

Required to verify problems.

Importance of usernames in reportsDo you think associating network activity, including bandwidth, traffic, Internet usage with IP address and username is a necessity or just nice to have

Page 14: Network Monitoring Trends 2014

www.netfort.comSlide 14

30.43%

17.39%

8.69%

43.47%

WiresharkFirewallSo-lar-WindsOther

Use of DPI toolsDo you use any deep packet inspection tools? If yes what do you use?

Most respondents are not using deep packet inspection tools at the moment but plan to in future.

Page 15: Network Monitoring Trends 2014

www.net for t .com