FINDINGS:NETBACKUP IS 3X FASTER THAN COMPETITOR “C”WHEN PERFORMING A GRANULAR RECOVERY BACKUP.

RESULTS FOR: GRANULAR RECOVERY

14

:00

15

:00

7:0

0

8:0

0

9:0

0

10

:00

11

:00

12

:00

13

:00

6:0

0

5:0

0

4:0

0

3:0

0

2:0

0

1:0

0

0:0

0

1X 2X 3XNetBackup enables granular recovery through a single-pass backup.Competitor “C” requires additional coordination between admins to enable granular recovery.

4:46

15:24

SPEED TEST

00

:30

00

:15

00

:00

01

:15

01

:00

00

:45

02

:15

02

:00

01

:45

01

:30

1,000VMs

00:08

1X 5X 10X 15X

02:15

RESULTS FOR: ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS

02:00

02:15

01:45

01:30

01:15

01:00

00:45

00:30

00:15

00:00

00:0500:16

00:32

01:12

02:15

00:05 00:06 00:08

100 VMs 200 VMs 500 VMs 1,000 VMs

Snapshots can be used to create quicker Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and more aggressive Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs). When testing crash consistent backups, NetBackup’s snapshot technology backed up 1,000 virtual machines in less than 9 minutes while Competitor “C” required over 2 hours.

NetBackup

Competitor “C”

FINDINGS:NETBACKUP REQUIRES LESS THAN 9 MINUTES TOBACK UP 1,000 VMS USING ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS.

COMPETITOR “C” REQUIRES OVER 2 HOURS TO COMPLETE THE SAME ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOT.

TOTA

L TI

ME

TO

CO

MPL

ETE

bac

kup

(Hou

rs:M

inut

es)

FOR ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTSSPEED TEST

(Hou

rs:M

inut

es)

00:08

SPEED

RESULTS FOR:HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP

9:00

11:00

13:00

15:00

7:00

5:00

3:00

1:00 0:25

2:52

0:43 1:112:51

6:16

14:32NetBackupCompetitor “C”

8:00

100 VMs 200 VMs 400 VMs 1,000 VMs

Zoom & Rotate

Lower times are better when it comes to backup windows. NetBackup saves you hours, especially in large-scale environments. As the environment scaled from 100 to 200, 400 and then 1,000 virtual machines, there were dramatic increases in the time required by Competitor "C" to perform the backups.

TOTA

L TI

ME

TO

CO

MPL

ETE

BA

CKU

P (H

ours

:Min

utes

)

15

:00

11

:00

13

:00

9:0

0

7:0

0

5:0

0

3:0

0

1:0

0

1,000VMs

1X 2X 3X 4X 5X

2:51

14:32

FOR HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP SPEED TEST

FINDINGS:NETBACKUP IS 11 HOURS FASTER THANCOMPETITOR “C” WHEN BACKING UP 1,000 VMS

(Hou

rs:M

inut

es)

Principled Technologies’ benchmark resultsshow that in a growing enterprise datacenter using VMware, NetBackup will scalesignificantly better than Competitor “C”.

NetBackup Competitor “C”RESULTS

HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP & RECOVERY

ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS

GRANULAR RECOVERY

BACKUP & RECOVERYSCALABILITY BENCHMARK

SCALE IN A VIRTUAL WORLD

“NetBackup IS THE MOSTSCALABLE BACKUP &

RECOVERY SOLUTION”

NetBackup

FASTER

0

24

6

810

1416

18

2022

12

4:46

15:24

3X

0

1

2

4

5

3

2:15

NetBackup

FASTER15X

0

2 4

6

810

1416

18

2022

12

2:51

1 4:32

NetBackup

FASTER3X

Want More Details on How Competitor C Fared Against NetBackup?

RESULTS

VMware Virtual Machines

Competitor “C”NetBackup

T E S T S P E R F O R M E D B YAn industry leader and expert in technology benchmark testingALL TESTS BASED ON:• Enterprise Backup and Recovery Solutions• Scaling from 100 to 1,000 VMware VMs• Real-world Situations and Workloads

WHAT IS THE MOSTSCALABLE SOLUTION?

NetBackup COMPETITOR “C”

Principled®Technologies

VIRTUAL MACHINE GROWTHDATA GROWTH

=X

LARGESCALEPROBLEM

Part# 21352225

© 2015 Veritas Technologies Corporation. All rights reserved. Veritas and the Veritas Logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Veritas Technologies Corporation or its affiliates in the U.S. And other countries. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

Updated 06/15

Download the Full Report Now

go.veritas.com/nbu-vs-c