Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ElectrifiedSustainable energy supply for Ga-Khosanye local municipality
MSc candidates
Prepared By:Michael PougnetMubeen GaibieSoul DanisebMegan Crawcour(Group 4, Project 2)
∗ Non-migratory (used to be semi-nomadic)∗ Education for the children (electricity)∗ Minimise western world impact
∗ Most feasible options were wind & solar and thus a combination of the two was selected
∗ Hydro was rejected (very location specific)
Project Reason & Choice
Project ChoiceSustainable option Sub options Main Disadvantage
Wind Wind farmWind mill at each site
Visual impactHigh upkeep costs
Photovoltaic (PV) PV farmPV roof panels
Visual impactVisual impact *
Hydro power (none) Location Specific
Anaerobic digestion Large unitSmall units (4)
High waste quantityHigh technology
*Visual impact can be mitigated by advising architect of village dwellings (Project EU2011-00589)
Given Wind Data and Sunny Days∗ Most feasible options were wind & solar and
thus a combination of the two was selected∗ Both have slight disadvantages in Winter
months but both will have battery backup
Project Choice
Work Breakdown StructureSustainable Electrification
Stakeholder Management
Sustainable Energy Options
Funding Methods
Infrastructure Operations
BeneficiariesUCT
FundersConsumer
Location
Technologies: WindSolar
Hydro AD
Combo(others)
EUDEATOthers
Transmission & Distribution
NetworksTransformers
Storage
TrainingOn-going support
Level 2
Level 3
Level 1
Work Breakdown StructureSustainable Electrification
Stakeholder Management
Sustainable Energy Options
Funding Methods
Infrastructure Operations
BeneficiariesUCT
FundersConsumer
Location
Technologies: WindSolar
Hydro AD
Combo(others)
EUDEATOthers
Transmission & Distribution
NetworksTransformers
Storage
TrainingOn-going support
Level 2Gantt chart to followLevel 3
Level 1
Gantt Chart (Programme)
Earned Value Analysis
BAC
EAC
SVCV
• CPI = 0.82 < 1• SPI = 1.11 > 1• EAC = R12 268 954• BAC = R10 111 200• ETC = R6 011 787
Earned Value Analysis
• CPI = 0.82 < 1• SPI = 1.11 > 1• ETC = R6 011 787• SV= BCWP-BCWS=-4.66• CV=BCWP-ACWP=1.49
R 0
R 2
R 4
R 6
R 8
R 10
R 12
R 14
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Time in Months of 2011
Co
st
in M
illi
on
s
TimeNowBCWSACWPBCWPBACEAC
Earned Value Analysis (Zoomed in)
• CPI = 0.82 < 1• SPI = 1.11 > 1• ETC = R6 011 787• SV= BCWP-BCWS=-4.66• CV=BCWP-ACWP=1.49
R 2
R 4
R 6
Jan Feb Mar Apr
Time in Months of 2011
Cos
t in
Mill
ions
TimeNowBCWSACWPBCWPBACEAC
List of Activities for QCP
Checklist (Sample)Standard/
Spec Responsibility Record
Verified
Site Research GIS 1002 Chief GeologistDocuments and
Surveys
Equipment ReceivingASTM
9000Project
Contractor Certificate
Solar Panels Installation ISO 4200Electrical
Engineers Certificate
Solar Panels Installed ISO 9001Electrical
Engineers Certificate
Solar Capacitors & Transformer Installation ISO 4200
Electrical Engineers Certificate
Solar Capacitors Installed ISO 9001Electrical
Engineers Certificate
Community PreparationOperational
Spec Social Scientist Certificate
∗ Tendering Specs:∗ Standard Tender Plan, R200.00 for tender documents∗ CIDB Certified Grade 4∗ Broad based black economic empowerment (BBBEE)
Level 4∗ Tender Plan
Procurement & Tenderingof the Solar Panels
Identified RisksRisk Likelihood Impact Loss of Funding Low Detrimental to the project
Quality of tendered items
Low High cost to replace
Revisions of software Medium PM office experienced delays
Community Acceptance
Medium Delay the start date
Incident on site High Delaying end date of project
Technology Failure Extreme High cost to repair
Stakeholders & Org. Chart(Execution Phase)
∗ Risk
∗ Success
Summary
