Upload
institut-lean-france
View
3.139
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A Con-Way case study presented by Mark Lear and Mike Orzen at the European Lean IT Summit 2012
Citation preview
22 & 23 November, 2012 Paris, France
Copyright © Institut Lean France 2012
Applying Value Streams
in a DevOps Environment
~~~
A Case Study
Mark Lear, Process Owner Project & Enhancement Value Stream (PEVS)
Mike Orzen, Lean IT Coach, Adjunct Professor
22 & 23 November, 2012 Paris, France
2
Agenda
• Who are Con-way and
Menlo?
• Lean background at Menlo
• Core Problems?
• Experimental
Countermeasures
• Expected Improvements
• Implementation Approach
• Results
• Lessons Learned
• Ongoing Challenges
• Q&A
Applying Value Streams in a DevOps Environment – Lear / Orzen
Con-way Inc.: $5 billion transportation & logistics company
•$3.1 billion revenue
•9,100 Tractors
•26,300 Trailers
•Nearly 300 service centers
•$1.5 billion gross revenue
•145 worldwide warehouse locations
•4,300 employees
Less-than-Truckload (LTL) Third-Party Logistics (3PL) Truckload (TL)
•$0.6 billion revenue
•2,600 Tractors
•8,100 Trailers
Integrity Safety Excellence Commitment Collaboration
3 Applying Value Streams in a DevOps Environment – Lear / Orzen
22 & 23 November, 2012 Paris, France
4
Background on Lean at Menlo
• Getting started
• A person with a vision
• A key ingredient
• Check-Adjust
• The glass ceiling
Applying Value Streams in a DevOps Environment – Lear / Orzen
22 & 23 November, 2012 Paris, France
5
Core Problems
External VOC Feedback:
• Cost and Delivery
• Quality
Applying Value Streams in a DevOps Environment – Lear / Orzen
22 & 23 November, 2012 Paris, France
6
Core Problems (continued)
Internal VOC:
• Organizational Structure
• Project and Resource
Management
• Work-Life Balance
Applying Value Streams in a DevOps Environment – Lear / Orzen
22 & 23 November, 2012 Paris, France
7
Experimental Countermeasures
Implementation of Value
Streams to address
standardization and flow:
• A “focused factory” concept
separating repetitive
production / operations
support work from project /
development work
Applying Value Streams in a DevOps Environment – Lear / Orzen
22 & 23 November, 2012 Paris, France
8
Expected Improvements
External VOC:
• Reduce cycle time
• Allow better cost isolation
• Improve quality of
systems / processes
Internal VOC:
• Increase team focus on flow/
standardization
• Simplify scheduling
• Improve work-life balance
Applying Value Streams in a DevOps Environment – Lear / Orzen
22 & 23 November, 2012 Paris, France
9
Implementation Approach
• Sold to IT managers first
• Documented value stream owner role
• Defined structure, boundaries and size of Value
Streams
• Socialized with team members and listened to
concerns
Applying Value Streams in a DevOps Environment – Lear / Orzen
22 & 23 November, 2012 Paris, France
10
Implementation Approach (continued)
• Held Town Hall to address concern areas:
– Co-location
– Production support seen as low-value work
– Team member rotation
– Suitability for smaller teams
– Sensitivity to “factory” reference
Applying Value Streams in a DevOps Environment – Lear / Orzen
22 & 23 November, 2012 Paris, France
11 Applying Value Streams in a DevOps Environment – Lear / Orzen
Pre-Sales Support
Project Mgmt
Customer Delivery
Technical Support
Integration TMS WMS Quality Testing
Business Intelligence
Integration TMS WMS Quality Testing
Business Intelligence
Customer Delivery
• Technical tools
• Job rotations
• Training
• Production turnover
Projects & Enhancements
Production Support
Sales to
Startu
p
Sustain
ed
O
pe
ration
s
Sust
ain
ed
O
pe
rati
on
s
Results – New Value Stream Organization
22 & 23 November, 2012 Paris, France
12
Results – IT Production Support
Applying Value Streams in a DevOps Environment – Lear / Orzen
0
5
10
15
no
v.-0
9
févr
.-1
0
mai
-10
aoû
t-1
0
no
v.-1
0
févr
.-1
1
mai
-11
aoû
t-1
1
no
v.-1
1
févr
.-1
2
mai
-12
aoû
t-1
2
Application Occurrences
0,00
5,00
10,00
15,00
20,00
25,00
30,00
no
v.-0
9
févr
.-1
0
mai
-10
aoû
t-1
0
no
v.-1
0
févr
.-1
1
mai
-11
aoû
t-1
1
no
v.-1
1
févr
.-1
2
mai
-12
aoû
t-1
2
Application Duration (hrs)
SMART Target 2011 2012 YTD
Critical Incidents resolved within 2 hours 28% 43%
High Incidents resolved within 4 hours 47% 54%
Expedited Service Requests resolved within 1 day 62% 75%
Overall incidents resolved within defined SLOs 86% 88%
Problem Resolution Tickets Opened / Resolved 34 / 23 58 / 51
Savings from Problem Resolution Team Kaizens $99.164 $170,758
22 & 23 November, 2012 Paris, France
13
Results – IT Projects and Enhancements
Applying Value Streams in a DevOps Environment – Lear / Orzen
SMART Target 2011 2012 YTD
Startups budget variance (+/- 10% budget) 58% 63%
Customer enhancement & R&D project budget variance (+/- 10% budget)
74% 72%
Post Go-Live Defect Tracking NA 52%
Enhancement Cycle Time 22-34 Weeks 16-28 Weeks
2012 Initiatives:
• Post go-live defect tracking
• Design Oversight Committee
• Iterative Development Approach
• Improved Forecasting and Demand /
Resource Planning
• Warehouse Management
Enhancement Value Stream Pilot
22 & 23 November, 2012 Paris, France
14
Lessons Learned
• Key Role: Process Owner
• Transition duration
• Reliance on key resources
• “Big Picture” understanding
• Employee engagement
• Change management /
Current-to-future state
• Metrics and measurements
Applying Value Streams in a DevOps Environment – Lear / Orzen
22 & 23 November, 2012 Paris, France
15
On-going Challenges
• Perception of Administrative
excess
• Low-hanging fruit is gone
• Keeping Lean fresh
• Manager engagement and
follow-up
• Metrics and measurements
Applying Value Streams in a DevOps Environment – Lear / Orzen
22 & 23 November, 2012 Paris, France
16
What’s Next?
• Both Value Streams
• Projects &
Enhancements
• Production Support
Applying Value Streams in a DevOps Environment – Lear / Orzen
22 & 23 November, 2012 Paris, France
17
Thank You!!
Mark Lear: [email protected]
Mike Orzen: [email protected]
Applying Value Streams in a DevOps Environment – Lear / Orzen
22 & 23 November, 2012 Paris, France
18
More Lean IT presentations and videos on
www.lean-it-summit.com