18
LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis Iain Sharp [email protected]

LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

From the LTE World Summit 2014

Citation preview

Page 1: LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

LTE Standards for Public Safety –

an independent analysis

Iain Sharp

[email protected]

Page 2: LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

2

LTE standards

Powerful

Efficient

Cheap

Constantly improving

Choice of vendors/operators

Ubiquitous

Reliable

Secure

Page 3: LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

3

3GPP Release 12

Radio Layer Features

Frequency band support

Power level support

Radio enablers for system features

System Features

Proximity services (ProSE)

Group call on LTE enablers (GCSE)

Page 4: LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

4

The balance was struck

More customization Less customization

More COTS technology reuse

Lower costs

Faster standardization

Less delivery risk

More operating

modes supported

Performance (KPI) improvements

Better support for “difficult”

radio situations

Few changes to system fundamentals –

Lots of value in overlay elements

Page 5: LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

5

• Client ↔ server application layer interface (PC1)

“not specified in this release”

• No User Equipment (UE) to network relay

• No out of coverage discovery

• Direct Mode limited in scope:

• One-to-many only

• Connectionless

• No QoS

Proximity services – Rel 12

Page 6: LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

6

• Client ↔ server application layer interface (GC1)

“not specified in this release”

• Delivery with unicast or broadcast service

• Not with UE to network relay

• GCSE app manages which service to use

• Dynamically!

• Manages continuity between modes

• Manages group call sessions and floor control (non-standard for now)

Group Calling (GCSE)

Page 7: LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

7

Essentials of the architecture

LTE Network

ProSe and GCSE

Applications

3GPP Interface

Alphabet soup!

LTE

Base

Stack

ProSe

GCSE

Application

3GPP

Interface

Application Interface

(Not part of 3GPP Rel 12)

Mobile

Operations

and

Management

GC1/PC1

API

Page 8: LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

8

PS applications are

not easy!

Page 9: LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

9

Inside the applications

Mobile Network

Phone

Client

Application

Service

Manager

Service resource

requirements

Network resource availability Resource

Manager

Policy

Service

Operations

and

Management

Page 10: LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

10

LTE standards – gaps to fill

Charging

Provisioning

3GPP provides base interfaces,

systems are highly operator-specific

Page 11: LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

11

• Standard protects cellular services from

unintentional public safety disruption

• User access to PS features is subscription

checked

• We don’t know the charging model for PS

usage of host networks

• What is integration process between PS

applications and host networks?

• How is (dynamic) resource information

shared?

Hosting PS users on cellular

Page 12: LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

12

• Need pre-established MBMS bearers

• Multicast connection may take 10-20s without

• Joining group may be slower than ideal

• Up to ~500ms vs 300ms target

• Unicast bearer quality

• Guarantee and be inefficient or optimize while

increasing latency?

• Handover between unicast and multicast

modes – lots of questions in practice

Some performance aspects

Page 13: LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

13

3GPP Release 12 Timing

2013 2014 2015

Architecture freeze Signalling &

radio freeze

2013 2014 2015

PLAN (last year)

PLAN (this year)

Finalize radio

performance requirements

and protocol encoding

ACTUAL??? (My Guess)

2013 2014 2015

Test specs?

Page 14: LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

14

• Group Call completion of original Rel. 12 requirements

• ProSe completion of original Rel. 12 requirements ++

• Isolated EUTRAN support for backhaul failure

• Mission Critical Push to Talk Over LTE application

Release 13

2014 2015

Signalling &

radio freeze

PLAN (June 14)

Requirements

freeze

Architecture

freeze

Maybe add 6 months to finalization date for reality

Page 15: LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

15

• Standards availability is a dependency you

can’t control

• Release 12 won’t gain traction in market

• Many will choose to wait for Release 13

• Complex relationship between PS

applications and host network

Risks

Page 16: LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

16

• Wait (if you can)

…sorry, but it’s true…

• Prepare operating modes ahead of standards:

• Billing

• Provisioning

• KPIs

• Integration processes

• Resource management/policy

• Prepare for migration off pre-standard services

Risk mitigation

Page 17: LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

17

First deployments are incredibly painful

BUT you can choose where to take the pain:

in the planning phase, or

in the mopping-up phase

always

Page 18: LTE Standards for Public Safety – an independent analysis

18

Iain Sharp

Director, Netovate

• Consultancy

• Training

• Intellectual property