Upload
josep-fabrega
View
595
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
These are the slides presented during the talk with same title, at NOC 2009 conference.There we proposed and demonstrated a DPSK homodyne receiver architecture based on a simple phase-diversity set-up with analog processing. Due to its spectral properties, it remarkably increases the phase noise tolerance of more conventional homodyne receivers. Also it can achieve high sensitivity and is integrable.
Citation preview
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
-- --G
CO
GC
OG
CO
GC
O
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)Dept. of Signal Theory and Communications (TSC)
Optical Communications Group (GCO)www.tsc.upc.edu/gco
Univ
ers
itat
Politè
cnic
ade C
ata
lunya
Low Cost Homodyne Transceiver Low Cost Homodyne Transceiver
for Ultrafor Ultra--Dense WDM Access Dense WDM Access
NetworksNetworks
Josep MJosep MJosep MJosep Mªªªª FFFFààààbregabregabregabrega and Josep Pratand Josep Pratand Josep Pratand Josep [email protected]
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
OutlineOutlineOutlineOutline
� Introduction
� Receiver Performances
∙ Phase Noise
∙ Channel spacing
� Case study: WDM tree PON
� Conclusions
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
IntroductionIntroductionIntroductionIntroduction
� Migration from TDM/WDM to pure WDM
� Ultra-dense WDM PONs
∙ Multiple low capacity channels
� E.g. 1 Gbps
λ
More than 1500 ch. at C band
...........................
3 GHz
[1] C.-H. Lee, et al., J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 4568-4583, Dec. 2006.
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
IntroductionIntroductionIntroductionIntroduction
∙ IM-DD systems limited
� Sensitivity
�Optical filters selectivity
∙ Coherent systems
�Heterodyne
– Image frequency problems
�Homodyne
– Phase locking problems LocalLaser
+
-
+
-OpticalInput Ip(t)
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
IntroductionIntroductionIntroductionIntroduction
Locallaser
+
-
Data and Phase
recovery
PM
Data
DataReceiver
TransceiverPSK Downstream
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
OutlineOutlineOutlineOutline
� Introduction
� ReceiverReceiverReceiverReceiver PerformancesPerformancesPerformancesPerformances
∙ Phase Noise
∙ Channel spacing
� Case study: WDM tree PON
� Conclusions
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
TimeTimeTimeTime----SwitchingSwitchingSwitchingSwitching PhasePhasePhasePhase DiversityDiversityDiversityDiversity ReceiverReceiverReceiverReceiver
Laser
CLKRecovery
+
-
PhaseScrambler
Tb
Tb
Tb/2
Data out
OpticalInput
I’
Q’
Vout
+
I’
Q’
outV
[2] J. Prat and J. M. Fabrega, ECOC 2005, Glasgow, Scotland, sept. 2005, paper We.P.104
0º
90º
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
Time Time Time Time SwitchingSwitchingSwitchingSwitching PhasePhasePhasePhase DiversityDiversityDiversityDiversity ReceiverReceiverReceiverReceiver
� Diversity achieved by switching local laser phase [1]
� Achieved high tolerance to laser linewidth with simple architecture [2] and narrow channel spacing [3]
� 3 dB penalty with respect to an ideal homodynesystem due to the phase switching
� Similar structure has been integrated on a chip [4]
I Q
t0 t0+T/2 t0+Tt
I Q
t0+3T/2 t0+2T
[2] J. Prat and J. M. Fabrega, ECOC 2005, Glasgow, Scotland, sept. 2005, paper We.P.104 [3] J. M. Fabrega and J. Prat, OSA Optics Letters, vol. 32, no. 5, March 2007[4] J. M. Fabrega and J. Prat, OSA Optics Letters, vol. 34, no. 4, February 2009[5] J. Klamkin, et al., in Proceedings LEOS 2007, pp. 40-41
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
TimeTimeTimeTime----SwitchingSwitchingSwitchingSwitching PhasePhasePhasePhase DiversityDiversityDiversityDiversity ReceiverReceiverReceiverReceiver
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
-1 -0,5 0 0,5 1-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
-1 -0,5 0 0,5 1
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
2 2 2 2 31 2
2 1 31 2 1 2 1 3
1 2
( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ' ( ) ' 1 sin sin
2 2
( ) ( )1cos 2 ( ) 2cos ( ) ( ) sin sin ( ) ( ) sin ( ) ( )
2 2
1sin 2 ( ) 2sin ( ) ( ) sin
2
out b
e
e
t tt tV C d t d t T
t tt t t t t t t
t t t
φ φφ φ
φ φφ φ φ φ φ φ φ
φ φ φ
∆ + ∆ ∆ + ∆ = − − − +
∆ + ∆ + ∆ + ∆ + ∆ + ∆ ∆ + ∆ +
+ ∆ + ∆ ( ) ( )2 1 31 2 1 3
( ) ( )cos ( ) ( ) sin ( ) ( )
2
t tt t t t
φ φ φ φ φ φ ∆ + ∆ − ∆ + ∆ ∆ + ∆
1( ) ( )
2b
e e
Tt t tφ φ φ ∆ = − −
( )2 ( )
2b
e e b
Tt t t Tφ φ φ ∆ = − − −
( )3
3( )
2b
e b e
Tt t T tφ φ φ ∆ = − − −
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
TimeTimeTimeTime----SwitchingSwitchingSwitchingSwitching PhasePhasePhasePhase DiversityDiversityDiversityDiversity ReceiverReceiverReceiverReceiver
Laser
CLKRecovery
+
-
PhaseScrambler
Tb
Data out
ES(t)
Tb/2ELO(t)
IP(t) I f(t)
Post-Processing
Vout
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
OutlineOutlineOutlineOutline
� Introduction
� Receiver Performances
∙ PhasePhasePhasePhase NoiseNoiseNoiseNoise
∙ Channel spacing
� Case study: WDM tree PON
� Conclusions
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
PhasePhasePhasePhase NoiseNoiseNoiseNoise: Experimental : Experimental : Experimental : Experimental SetupSetupSetupSetup
PRBS
CW Laser 1
-
Balancedreceiver
PM
CLK
fiberMZM
0º-180º
0º-90º
ElectricalprocessingOSC
ESA
CW Laser 2
TX
LO
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000
Frequency (MHz)
Pow
er (
dBm
)
Bit rate fixed at 1 Gbps
Data DPSK modulated
CW Laser 1: External Cavity laser @ 100 kHz Linewidth
CW Laser 2: Standard DFB Laser @ 1-30 MHz Linewidth
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
PhasePhasePhasePhase NoiseNoiseNoiseNoise: : : : ResultsResultsResultsResults
� High sensitivity:
∙ -38 dBm sensitivity @ BER 10-9
� High phase noise tolerance:
∙ 18 MHz Linewidth tolerance @ BER 10-3
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Total laser linewidth (MHz)
log(
BE
R)
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-46 -45 -44 -43 -42 -41 -40 -39 -38
Input power (dBm)
log(
BE
R)
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
OutlineOutlineOutlineOutline
� Introduction
� Receiver Performances
∙ Phase Noise
∙ ChannelChannelChannelChannel spacingspacingspacingspacing
� Case study: WDM tree PON
� Conclusions
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
ChannelChannelChannelChannel SpacingSpacingSpacingSpacing: Experimental : Experimental : Experimental : Experimental SetupSetupSetupSetup
PRBS
CW Laser 1
--
Balancedreceiver
PM
CLK
27 kmfiber
0º-180º
0º-90º
Electricalprocessing
OSC
ESA
CW Laser 2
INT
LO
PM
MZM0º-180º
PRBS
CW Laser 3
TX
Bit rate fixed at 1 Gbps
Data DPSK modulated
CW Laser 1-3: External Cavity laser @ 100 kHz Linewidth
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
ChannelChannelChannelChannel SpacingSpacingSpacingSpacing: : : : ResultsResultsResultsResults
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Channel spacing (GHz)
Pen
alty
(dB
)
Numericalmodel
Ideal system
� 1 dB penalty @ 3 GHz channel spacing
� 3 dB penalty @ <2 GHz channel spacing
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
OutlineOutlineOutlineOutline
� Introduction
� Receiver Performances
∙ Phase Noise
∙ Channel spacing
� CaseCaseCaseCase studystudystudystudy: WDM : WDM : WDM : WDM treetreetreetree PONPONPONPON
� Conclusions
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
CaseCaseCaseCase studystudystudystudy: WDM : WDM : WDM : WDM treetreetreetree PONPONPONPON
Laser
CLKRecovery
PhaseModulator
Tb
Data out
Tb/2MZM
Data in
0º-180º
Optical
Output
Optical
Input
D-WDM MUX
(RN 1)
CO
power splitter(RN 2)
λ1 .. λN D-WDM bands
Nx PONs
λ1 D-WDM band
λN D-W
DM band
K UD-WDM channels
D-WDM band
CPE
CPE
CPE
CPE
CPE
CPE
K users
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
WDM WDM WDM WDM treetreetreetree PON experimentsPON experimentsPON experimentsPON experiments
� Transmission experiments at 1 Gbps
� DPSK modulation format
� 40x32 = 1280 users � > 1 Tbps
� Outside plant losses
∙ AWG 1x40 IL = 6.47dB
∙ 1:32 power splitter IL = 16dB
∙ 25km SMF span IL = 5.2dB
� –38.7 dBm sensitivity @ BER 10-10
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
WDM WDM WDM WDM treetreetreetree PON experimentsPON experimentsPON experimentsPON experiments
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-48 -46 -44 -42 -40 -38 -36
Input power (dBm)
log(
BE
R)
Downstream
Upstream
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
OutlineOutlineOutlineOutline
� Introduction
� Receiver Performances
∙ Phase Noise
∙ Channel spacing
� Case study: WDM tree PON
� ConclusionsConclusionsConclusionsConclusions
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
ConclusionsConclusionsConclusionsConclusions
� A new homodyne receiver was discussed and demonstrated.
� Ideal for a λTTU environment
� Sensitivity of -38 dBm for a BER 10-9, at 1 Gbps
� Linewidth tolerance of 18 MHz linewidth. ∙ FEC codes must be used
� Minimum channel spacing of 3 GHz @ 1 Gbps
� Pure WDM-Tree PON results reported∙ -38.7 dBm sensitivity @ 1 Gbps
� The architecture proposed is fully integrable
� Homodyne reception is a feasible way to enable UD-WDM PONs in a near future.
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
-- --G
CO
GC
OG
CO
GC
O
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)Dept. of Signal Theory and Communications (TSC)
Optical Communications Group (GCO)www.tsc.upc.edu/gco
Univ
ers
itat
Politè
cnic
ade C
ata
lunya
ThanksThanks!!!!
Josep MJosep MJosep MJosep Mªªªª FFFFàààà[email protected]