Upload
carrieriddle
View
165
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
City of Grand Forks
Final Report – Rev. 1 May 2009
Utilities Capital Planning
May 22, 2009 Ms Sasha Bird City of Grand Forks 6350 2nd Street Grand Forks, B.C. V0H 1H0 Dear Ms Bird: RE: UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING Final Report – Rev. 1 Our File 147.126 - 300 We are pleased to submit the enclosed copy of our final report to City council for the above-
captioned project and summarizes all of the work completed on the assignment to date.
Yours truly, KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. Irfan Gehlen, P.Eng. Project Manager IG/ww Encl. O:\0100-0199\147-126\300-Reports\CapitalPlan_Final V2\CoverLETTER v2.doc
City of Grand Forks
Final Report – Rev. 1 May 2009
Utilities Capital Planning
KWL File No. 147.126
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1
MAY 2009
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS
This document has been prepared by Kerr Wood Leidal Associates Ltd. (KWL) for the exclusive use and benefit of the City of Grand Forks for Utilities Capital Planning. No other party is entitled to rely on any of the conclusions, data, opinions, or any other information contained in this document. This document represents KWL’s best professional judgement based on the information available at the time of its completion and as appropriate for the project scope of work. Services performed in developing the content of this document have been conducted in a manner consistent with that level and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the engineering profession currently practising under similar conditions. No warranty, express or implied, is made.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
These materials (text, tables, figures and drawings included herein) are copyright of Kerr Wood Leidal Associates Ltd. (KWL). The City of Grand Forks is permitted to reproduce the materials for archiving and for distribution to third parties only as required to conduct business specifically relating to Utilities Capital Planning. Any other use of these materials without the written permission of KWL is prohibited.
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1
MAY 2009
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................1-1 1.1 BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 PROJECT SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................1-1 1.3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................1-2 1.4 METHODOLOGY...............................................................................................................................1-2 1.5 KWL TECHNICAL REFERENCES .......................................................................................................1-3
2. SANITARY SYSTEM ........................................................................................2-1 2.1 EXISTING SYSTEM ...........................................................................................................................2-1
WASTEWATER COLLECTION .............................................................................................................2-1 WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND EFFLUENT DISPOSAL .......................................................................2-2
2.2 CAPITAL PROJECTS ........................................................................................................................2-3 2.3 UNIT RATES ....................................................................................................................................2-4
3. POTABLE WATER SYSTEM............................................................................3-1 3.1 EXISTING SYSTEM ...........................................................................................................................3-1
WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM .................................................................................................................3-1 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ....................................................................................................................3-2 WATER CONSERVATION...................................................................................................................3-3
3.2 CAPITAL PROJECTS ........................................................................................................................3-3 3.3 UNIT RATES ....................................................................................................................................3-5
4. STORMWATER SYSTEM.................................................................................4-1 4.1 EXISTING SYSTEM ...........................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM ..........................................................................................................4-1 4.3 CAPITAL PROJECTS ........................................................................................................................4-2
5. ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE..............................................................................5-1 5.1 EXISTING ROAD SYSTEM .................................................................................................................5-1 5.2 SIDEWALKS.....................................................................................................................................5-1 5.3 CAPITAL PROJECTS ........................................................................................................................5-1 5.4 UNIT RATES ....................................................................................................................................5-2
6. MULTI-UTILITY UPGRADING STRATEGY......................................................6-1 6.1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES.......................................................................................................................6-1 6.2 UPGRADE PRIORITIES......................................................................................................................6-1 6.3 CAPITAL PROJECTS ........................................................................................................................6-2
7. CAPITAL PLAN ................................................................................................7-1
8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................8-1 8.1 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................8-1 8.2 RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................................................................8-1
9. REPORT SUBMISSION....................................................................................9-1
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1 MAY 2009
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD.
Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
FIGURES Figure 2-1: Existing Sanitary System.....................................................................................................2-5 Figure 2-2: Sanitary CCTV Inspection Results......................................................................................2-6 Figure 3-1: Existing Potable Water System...........................................................................................3-6 Figure 3-2: Fireflow Contours – Existing System (One Reservoir).....................................................3-7 Figure 3-3: Fireflow Contours – Proposed Two Reservoir Concept...................................................3-8 Figure 3-4: Existing Water System Pipe Age ........................................................................................3-9 Figure 3-5: Existing Water System – Pipe Replacement Priorities...................................................3-10 Figure 4-1: Existing Stormwater Management System........................................................................4-4 Figure 5-1: Existing Road Infrastructure Network................................................................................5-3 Figure 5-2: Sidewalk Plan........................................................................................................................5-4 Figure 5-3: Road Upgrade Priorities ......................................................................................................5-5 Figure 6-1: Multi-Utility Upgrading Priorities ........................................................................................6-3 TABLES Table 1-1: List of Past KWL Reports ......................................................................................................1-4 Table 7-1: Capital Plan.............................................................................................................................7-2
Section 1 Introduction
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1
MAY 2009
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. 1-1 Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
The City of Grand Forks has a major investment in municipal infrastructure systems, which include water supply, wastewater management, storm drainage, road and sidewalk systems. In general, components of these systems are old and in need of refurbishment. The City has commissioned this planning initiative in order to establish a multi-year upgrading programme to upgrade these systems. Over recent years the City has not experienced significant community growth and the population has remained relatively stable in the range of 4,200 people. Current economic conditions have created significant challenges for the major employment centres in the City and reduced or eliminated short to medium term community growth prospects. While planning for future growth must not be ignored, it appears that the appropriate focus of any infrastructure capital investment program at this time should be on rehabilitation and upgrading of existing facilities and not expansion of these systems.
1.2 PROJECT SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES
The objective of this assignment was to assess the existing infrastructure, identify upgrading requirements, compile capital cost estimates and develop a prioritized upgrading program. This plan has been prepared on the basis of a 10-year horizon for capital planning. The scope of this plan includes work related to the sanitary system, potable water system, stormwater system, and road transportation network. It is important to note that the upgrades discussed in this report are almost all at the conceptual level and will require detailed design work to be completed prior to proceeding to construction. Copper Field is an area of approximately 200 hectares at the northern end of the city. It currently has rural status where the province is currently responsible for subdivision development approval. The Regional District of Kootenay Boundary is currently responsible for zoning and development permit approvals. In the context of the Grand Forks capital plan, there would likely be a need to extend municipal infrastructure to serve Copper Field if it becomes a part of the City where capital costs would be paid by the developer. This report only considers the infrastructure upgrade needs within existing municipal boundaries, and excludes any discussion on infrastructure needs due to potential boundary extensions. This report is intended to provide the City with the framework for proceeding with necessary utility upgrade work. It is possible that unforeseen factors arising from the
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1 MAY 2009
1-2 KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD.
Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
implementation of the initial capital tasks may affect the timeline and capital budget developed herein.
1.3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
KWL wishes to acknowledge the valuable input provided by the following City staff in preparing this capital plan: Mr. Victor Kumar; Ms. Cecile Arnott; Mr. Wayne Kopan; Ms. Sasha Bird; Mr. Dean Chapman; Mr. Ross Idler; and Mr. Dave Reid.
1.4 METHODOLOGY
This report has been based on the following resources and initiatives: • A two day Planning Workshop attended by City representatives and KWL staff held
on February 11th and 12th 2009.
• A number of technical reports and other submissions prepared by KWL for the City since the mid 1990’s, as detailed in Section 1.5 below. The majority of these documents relate to the water and sewer system only.
• City of Grand Forks Road Rehabilitation Study from October 2000, compiled by EMCON.
The proposed capital plan individually addresses the upgrading requirements of the water, sewer, storm drainage and roads systems within the community. It was also considered expedient to look for geographical synergies between these upgrading initiatives. This approach is necessary in order to ensure that any required underground piping work can be undertaken immediately prior to any necessary road repaving. This planning strategy has generated a fourth category of infrastructure upgrading, referred to as multi-utility upgrading, and this topic is addressed in Chapter 6 of this report. Capital cost estimates have been based on projected costs for construction in 2010 and no allowance has been made for cost inflation beyond this date. The adopted capital plan will therefore need adjustment for inflation in future years. Except for a few instances where detailed design work has already been undertaken, these estimates should be considered as Class D preliminary estimates which will need refinement once more detailed engineering analysis and design have been completed.
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1
MAY 2009
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. 1-3 Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
1.5 KWL TECHNICAL REFERENCES
Table 1-1 summarizes relevant engineering work on the municipal infrastructure system previously complete by KWL. In general terms this Utilities Capital Plan report does not attempt to reproduce any of this technical material and interested parties can consult these documents for more detailed information on the various issues.
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1
MAY 2009
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
Table 1-1: Summary of Reports and Other Submissions by KWL 1991 to 2008 Project # Report Title Date
147.033 Design Memorandum for Replacement Feedermain from Mill Creek Reservoir 1991 147.033 Contract No. 147.039 for Construction of Replacement Feedermain from Mill Creek Res. 1992 147.038 Overview Report on Water Utility Financing 1992
147.039 Plans for Infrastructure Expansion and Schedule for Development Cost Changes to Meet the Needs of Future Development. Infrastructure Planning Studies 1992
147.040 Work Program for Development of Rate Models 1993 147.039F A Look Beyond the Year 2000: Summary Report on Planning for Future Growth 1994 147.039J A Look Beyond the Year 2000: Presentation to City Council on Planning for Future Growth 1994 147.039A Design Populations for Long-Range System Planning 1994 147.039B Report on Computer Modelling and Waterworks System Performance 1994 147.039C Report on a Long-Term Wastewater Management Strategy 1994 147.039D/E Impact of Subdivision Development on the Drainage System (D) and Roadway System (E) 1994 147.039 Status Rpt. No. 6 on Eng. Work for Infrastructure Expansion & Wastewater Treatment 1994 147.048 Contract No. 147.048 for 1995 Water and Sewer Construction Program 1995 147.049 Presentation to City Council on Infrastructure Expansion and Wastewater Treatment 1995
- Investigation of Molybdenum Sources in the Wastewater System 1995 1027.004 Report on Lagoon System Performance and Sludge Removal 1995 1027.005 Pre-Design Report on a New Wastewater Treatment Facility 1995 147.039F A Look Beyond the Year 2000: Summary Report on Planning for Future Growth 1995 1027.007 Contract 1027.007 for Construction of Grand Forks Wastewater Treatment Facility 1996 147.045 Engineering Work Program for Pump Station Audits and Reliability Assessments 1996 147.045 Study Report Pump Station Audit and Reliability Assessment 1996 147.056 Interim Report on Data Collection and SCADA Planning 1997 147.055 Pre-Design for New Westside Reservoir 1997 147.061 Ruckles Sewer Expansion 1997 147.056 Interim Report on Data Collection and SCADA Planning Part B 1998 147.068 Sewage Pump Station Upgrading Program 1998 147.060 Final Report: Valley Heights Preliminary Assessment of Access Alternatives 1998 147.076 Request for Quotation for Supply and Delivery of Sewage Pumps for Boundary Lift Station 1999 147.076 Upgrade of Boundary Lift Station 1999 147.074 Predesign Report for the Westside Reservoir 1999 147.078 Water and Sewer Servicing Study 1999 147.091 Granby River Water Main Crossing 2001 147.074 Predesign Report for the Westside Reservoir 2002 147.087 Wastewater Treatment Plant Lagoon Upgrading Study 2003 147.099 Infiltration and Inflow Study 2004 147.102 WWTP Plant Optimization 2004 147.107X Proposal for Engineering Services: Amendment to the Development Cost Charges Bylaw 2005 147.105 WWTP Headworks Upgrading 2007 147.109 WWTP Lagoon Land Advice 2007 147.117 Grandby River Dyke Repair 2007 2344.001 City Park Lift Station 2008 Notes: 1. Documents dated 1990 and before are excluded. 2. It is understood that copies of all of the documentation were originally supplied to the City of Grand Forks by KWL.
Section 2 Sanitary System
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1
MAY 2009
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. 2-1 Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
2. SANITARY SYSTEM
2.1 EXISTING SYSTEM
The Grand Forks wastewater collection system consists of three trunk sewers running from the north, east, and west sides of the City which discharge into an interceptor sewer. This sewer conveys sanitary flows via the Park and Industrial pump stations to the municipal wastewater treatment plant. Treated effluent from the wastewater treatment plant is discharged via outfall to the Kettle River. Figure 2-1 shows the layout of the existing sanitary system at Grand Forks.
WASTEWATER COLLECTION
Past studies by KWL identified the need to upgrade several sections of the trunk sewer system to address hydraulic capacity deficiencies. The most recent study on this topic was the Sanitary Sewer Model Update completed in 2008 which reviewed the hydraulic capacity of the sanitary sewer system. Recommendations to upgrade sections of the South Kettle Trunk sewer were made based on computer model results generated as part of the scope of work for the sewer model update. It should be noted that the sewer modeling indicated that this South Kettle sewer will experience some surcharging at times of peak flow. This work should be included as part of the Park Lift Station upgrade. The estimated capital cost in 2007 for upgrade of the South Kettle sewer was approximately $500,000. A Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) inspection of a major portion of the Grand Forks sanitary system has previously been conducted and the results were presented in KWL’s Inflow and Infiltration Study in 2004. Figure 2-2 shows the structural condition of the existing sanitary system classified according to the severity of the structural defects found in each pipe. The objectives of the CCTV inspection were to review the physical condition of the pipe, identifying the areas in which inflow and infiltration (I/I) volumes could be reduced by maintenance and upgrade work, and make recommendations for an I/I reduction and sewer maintenance program, and estimating the collection system rehabilitation and improvement costs. As a result, KWL concluded that, based on the collected information, the City was generally in compliance with the Municipal Sewage Regulation (MSR) with regards to I/I. However, there were areas of concern with respect to the existing sewers that could lead to an increase in I/I over time if the sewers are not adequately maintained and/or refurbished. The highest priority for upgrading the wastewater collection system should be to initiate repairs of all severe structural defects. However, since the 2004 CCTV inspection did not
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1 MAY 2009
2-2 KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD.
Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
cover the entire system, there may be additional severe defects that have not yet been identified. Therefore, the completion of CCTV inspection for the remaining sewers should also be considered as a priority item. The City Park lift station requires upgrading due to its relative age and inadequate hydraulic capacity. KWL completed the detailed design for this upgrade and this project is currently on hold pending the availability of capital funding. The cost of this project and related infrastructure was estimated at approximately $3.7 million. Since the Park lift station is the key facility that conveys over 90% of the City’s sewage to the wastewater treatment plant, this project should be considered as a high priority for upgrading of the wastewater conveyance system.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND EFFLUENT DISPOSAL
Prior to 1996, wastewater treatment consisted of a simple two-cell lagoon system for wastewater treatment but this system had become overloaded by the mid-1990s. A new mechanical-type secondary wastewater treatment facility was built to increase both treatment capacity and effluent quality, and the existing lagoons were upgraded to operate in parallel with the new facility. This new facility uses the extended aeration process, complete with clarifiers for solids separation, aerobic digestion tanks for biosolids management, and chlorine disinfection of the effluent. The design of the mechanical treatment plant provided for a future doubling of the plant capacity by adding a second circular process tankage unit and other smaller plant modifications. It is anticipated that the current wastewater treatment facilities will have adequate capacity to meet community needs for at least the next ten years unless there is growth and a boundary extension. Although the topic has been previously addressed, only limited engineering work has been done to date on developing a long term plan for biosolids management. Biosolids continue to be piped to the secondary treatment lagoon where they continue to accumulate. At some stage this lagoon will need to be desludged, an expensive process, unless an alternative biosolids management is adopted. Due to natural processes, these biosolids are known to contain elevated levels of molybdenum which must not be allowed to enter the food chain. This factor creates a significant constraint in the future development of any new biosolids management strategy. It is recommended that the capital plan include an allowance to desludge these lagoons and/or install a new biosolids handling system. The existing treatment plant continues to use a chlorine based system for effluent disinfection. Due to operator safety and environmental protection considerations, this technology has been overtaken in recent years by ultra-violet (UV) disinfection. At some stage the City will likely be required to either dechlorinate the effluent prior to discharge to the river or replace the existing disinfection equipment with UV technology. The latter strategy would appear to be a better capital investment. In the short term some minor changes to the chlorine contact chamber, in order to increase the height of the walls, is reportedly required.
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1
MAY 2009
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. 2-3 Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
2.2 CAPITAL PROJECTS
The recommended annual budget for sanitary system capital projects will be $1.0 million. The following list outlines the capital projects specific to the sanitary system using an implementation timeline based on a strategy of distributing these capital projects over time to work within this annual budget: 1. Initiate CCTV Inspection in Year 1 on sewer sections not previously
investigated.
CCTV inspection of sewers not covered in the 2004 study is recommended as a high priority item that should be initiated as soon as possible to allow the City to identify any structural defects in these remaining sections of the municipal sewer system. It is important to note that the results of this additional CCTV inspection may require the capital plan to be modified to address presently unidentified problems. The extent of any such changes will depend on the number and severity of structural defects detected.
2. Initiate Repair of Structural Defects in Year 1 and adopt as an annual task.
The highest priority for the sanitary system is to repair the severe structural defects identified in the 2004 Inflow and Infiltration report. The locations of these defects have been identified in Figure 2-2. Repair of these identified defects will have a beneficial effect on reducing the volume of inflow and infiltration entering the sanitary system, and will also increase the hydraulic capacity of these pipes by reducing flow restrictions or blockages. Other high priority areas are also indicated on this figure. It is recommended that this work be initiated as soon as possible.
Structural defects not considered as major have been classified as either moderate or minor structural defects. These medium and low priority upgrades can be initiated as part of an annual program to upgrade the sanitary system.
3. Park Lift Station replacement in Year 1
The City Park lift station replacement should be considered as a high-priority item in the capital plan since it is the key facility that conveys over 90% of the City’s sewage to the wastewater treatment plant. Priority should be given to this project as it is old and hydraulically undersized. Furthermore, it is a “shovel-ready” project where preliminary and detailed engineering design work has already been completed.
4. South Kettle Sewer upgrade in Year 1
The upgrade of the South Kettle trunk sewer is a medium-priority item to eliminate the potential for sewer surcharge and to provide adequate hydraulic capacity for wastewater conveyance upon completion of the Park lift station construction
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1 MAY 2009
2-4 KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD.
Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
(Project #3). This project should be included as part of the Park Lift Station upgrade project.
5. Upgrade the Wastewater Disinfection System in Year 6.
As a medium-priority project, the existing chlorine based wastewater disinfection system should be upgraded with a new UV system to provide adequate disinfection of the wastewater effluent and to eliminate the use of chlorine.
6. Upgrade Sludge Management System in Year 9.
Upgrades to the sewage lagoon currently used as a storage area for residual sludge will ultimately be necessary as the available storage capacity of the lagoon diminishes. This is a lower-priority item that could be addressed in the future, but it is important to note that there may need for engineering work related to evaluating the economic feasibility of re-using the desludged lagoon for future sludge storage versus migrating to a more advanced sludge dewatering and disposal system.
7. Multi-utility Upgrading Initiatives.
To address sanitary system upgrades in locations throughout the City where there are other utilities that could also be beneficially be upgraded at the same time, a reserve amount should be set aside on an annual basis to allow multi-utility upgrade projects to be independently initiated. A more detailed discussion on multi-utility upgrade projects can be found in Section 6 of this report.
8. Miscellaneous Projects and Minor Upgrade Work.
A budget amount of $100,000 to $200,000 per year should be reserved for completing miscellaneous projects and minor upgrades to the sanitary system. These include projects such as smoke and dye testing of sewers, sewer main re-lining program, and miscellaneous upgrade of the WWTP headworks.
2.3 UNIT RATES
The unit rates used to develop the capital budgets for upgrade work on the gravity sewer collection system are as follows: $10,000 per severe structural defect; $5,000 per minor and moderate structural defect; $350 per lineal metre of sanitary sewer required for complete pipe replacement; and $12 per lineal metre of pipe requiring CCTV inspection.
These unit rates have been estimated based on KWL’s recent experience on past projects and is intended for capital planning purposes only.
Project No. Date
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!( !(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(ÏÎ
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!( !(!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
ÏÎ!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !( !(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
ÏÎ
ÏÎ
ÏÎ
ÏÎ
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
K E T T L E R I V E R
K E T T L E R I V E R
G R A N B YR I V E R
ST
ST
WAY
WAY
7TH
6TH
5TH
4TH
3RD
2ND
1ST
AVE
AVE
WAY
WAY
WAY
R/W
R/W
ROAD
ROAD
69TH
68TH
76TH
76TH
FORK
CRES
PARK
ROAD
ROAD
ROADROAD
66TH
65TH
ROAD
ROAD
LANE
CRES
ROAD
ROADROAD
LOGAN
FIFTH
NORTH
BLUFF
FIRST
RIVER DRIVE
RIVER DRIVE
33813
JASPER
AVEN
UE
ANDROS
RANK
ENAV
ENUE
STREETSTREETSTREETSTREETSTREET
STREET
AVENUE
STRE
ET
VALLEY
VALLEY
STREET
SECOND
KONK
EN
AVENUE
AVENUE
KETTLE
KETT
LE
AVENUE
WALNUT
13A S
T
CAMERON
PINE R
D
29TH
ST
13A S
T.
62ND AVE
63RD AVE
REPU
BLIC
G N ROAD
G N
ROAD
72ND AVE
73RD AVE
78TH AVE
71ST AVE
DOWE
DOFF
62ND AVE
60TH AVE
71ST AVE
79th AVE
ALMA AVE
68TH AVE
67TH AVE
MORRISSEY
78TH AVE
ROAD EAST
22ND ST
21ST ST
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
MORRISSEY
LAUREL AVE
SILVE
R AVE
WARD ROAD
CREEK ROAD
INDUSTRIAL
COPP
ER AV
E
RANK
EN AV
E
25TH
ST
20TH ST
17TH ST
CLOSED RD.
27TH
ST
COMO
ST
RIVER ROAD
BEAT
RICE
RD
66TH AVE
65TH AVE
64TH AVE
62ND AVENUE
BARRETT AVE
CYPRESS WAY
25TH STREET
23RD STREET
13TH
STRE
ET
12TH
STRE
ET
11TH STREET
73RD AVE
HUGH
ES RO
AD
DANI
SH RO
AD
24TH
ST
61ST AVE
SPRING CRES
75TH AVENUE
SELKIRK PL.
59TH AVE
GRANBY ROAD
COMO
RO
AD
BIRCH ROAD
72ND AVENUE
WARD
LAKE
RD
REZANSOFF RD
72ND AVE
72ND AVE
VICTORIA WAY
WINNIPEG AVE
66TH AVENUE
65TH AVENUE
VAN NESS WAY
MOUNTAIN PL.
SPRA
GGET
T RD
60TH AVENUE
BRYCEN PLACE
73RD AVE
VINE
STR
EET
PLOT
NIKO
FF RD
KOFTINKOFF RD
19TH ST
19TH ST
HIGHWAY NO 3
2ND STREET
BIRC
H S
TREE
T12TH
ST
REET
PINE V
IEW
CRES
77TH AVE
78TH AVE
67TH AVENUE
68TH AVENUE
HEIGHTS DRIVEHEIGHTS DRIVE
12TH STREET
ALMOND GARDENS
SPRA
GGET
T ROA
D
CENTRAL AVENUE
COOP
ER
ROAD
COMO
ST
REET
KENM
ORE
ROA
D
10TH
ST
REET
66TH AVENUE
23RD STREET22ND STREET
21ST STREET
20TH STREET
19TH STREET 18TH STREET 17TH STREET 16TH STREET
NORT
H FOR
K ROA
D
LONDON ROAD
19TH
ST
REET
18TH
ST
REET
72ND AVENUE
SAND CREEK ROAD
SAND
CRE
EK R
OAD
SAND CREEK
ROAD
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVE
RSID
E DRI
VE
85TH AVENUE
70TH AVENUE
COLUMBIA DRIVE
THIRD ROAD
DONALDSON DRIVE
DONALDSON DRIVE
DONALDSON DRIVE
73RD AVENUE
PERE
VERS
OFF R
OAD
DIVI
SION
ROA
D
8TH STREET
9TH
S
TREE
T
CASCADE BOULEVARD
SIXTH ROAD
76TH AVENUE
CENTRAL AVENUE
COALCHUTE ROAD
18TH
S
TREE
T
17TH
S
TREE
T
SAGAMORE AVENUE
76TH AVENUE
BEVERLEY AVENUE
DARC
Y
RO
AD
21ST STREET
68TH AVENUE
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
82ND AVENUE83RD
AVENUE84TH AVENUE
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
19TH
STRE
ET
McCA
LLUM
VIEW
DRI
VE
McCALLUM VIEW DRIVE
77TH AVE
81ST AVENUE
5TH
STR
EET
78TH AVENUE
80TH A
VENUE
75TH AVENUE
8TH STREET
6TH STREET
5TH STREET
4TH STREET
3RD STREET
2ND STREET
8TH STREET
7TH STREET
6TH STREET
5TH STREET
4TH STREET
3RD STREET
68TH AVENUE
68TH AVENUE
66TH AVENUE
9TH STREET
10TH STREET
27TH STREET
DONALDSON DRIVE
22ND STREET
CORO
NATI
ON
PLA
CE
SAGAMORE AVENUE
BOUN
DARY
DRI
VEBO
UNDA
RY
D
RIVE
75TH
AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
16TH
ST
REET
77TH AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
YALE
MANLY
STREET
AVENUE
GOLDEN
WESTERN CENTRAL
25TH ST
SUNSHINE
SILVE
R AVE
COMO
ST
CREEK ROAD
POPOFF ROAD
13TH STREET
14TH
STRE
ET
65TH AVE
18TH ST
72ND AVENUE
SIXTH ROAD
72ND AVE
HIGHWAY NO 3
JMAYOFF ROAD
GRAN
BY ST
REET
WELLINGTON CR
CENTRAL AVE
LANSDOWNE CRES
11TH STREET
FOURTH ROAD
7TH STREET
CENTRAL AVENUE
COALCHUTE ROAD
KETT
LE RI
VER D
RIVE
79TH AVE
70TH AVENUE
MAPLE STREET
9TH STREET
7TH STREET
2ND STREET
INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
2ND STREET
LAW
RENC
E
STR
EET
10TH STREET
NORT
HFOR
K - F
RANK
LIN R
D
MARKET
AVENUE
81ST AVENUE
6TH STREET
JASPER AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
CENTRAL
AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
SOUTHERN TRANS PROVINCIAL HIGHWAY NO 3
17TH
ST
REET
147-126 May 2009
Existing SanitarySystem
City of Grand ForksUtilities Capital Plan
Legend
300 3000
1:15,000Scale in Metres
Municipal Boundary
Sanitary Main
Sanitary Forcemain
!( Manhole
ÏÎ Pump Station
Val-MarPump Station
BoundaryPump Station
MarlexPump Station
Park Pump Station
Granby Pump Station
Industrial Pump Station
WWTP
Figure 2-1
O:\01
00-01
99\14
7-126
\430-G
IS\M
XD-R
p\147
126F
ig2-1.
mxd
04/05
/2009
@ 2:
40:58
PM
Project No. Date
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!( !(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(ÏÎ
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!( !(!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
ÏÎ!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !( !(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
ÏÎ
ÏÎ
ÏÎ
ÏÎ
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
K E T T L E R I V E R
K E T T L E R I V E R
G R A N B YR I V E R
ST
ST
WAY
WAY
7TH
6TH
5TH
4TH
3RD
2ND
1ST
AVE
AVE
WAY
WAY
WAY
R/W
R/W
ROAD
ROAD
69TH
68TH
76TH
76TH
FORK
CRES
PARK
ROAD
ROAD
ROADROAD
66TH
65TH
ROAD
ROAD
LANE
CRES
ROAD
ROADROAD
LOGAN
FIFTH
NORTH
BLUFF
FIRST
RIVER DRIVE
RIVER DRIVE
33813
JASPER
AVEN
UE
ANDROS
RANK
ENAV
ENUE
STREETSTREETSTREETSTREETSTREET
STREET
AVENUE
STRE
ET
VALLEY
VALLEY
STREET
SECOND
KONK
EN
AVENUE
AVENUE
KETTLE
KETT
LE
AVENUE
WALNUT
13A S
T
CAMERON
PINE R
D
29TH
ST
13A S
T.
62ND AVE
63RD AVE
REPU
BLIC
G N ROAD
G N
ROAD
72ND AVE
73RD AVE
78TH AVE
71ST AVE
DOWE
DOFF
62ND AVE
60TH AVE
71ST AVE
79th AVE
ALMA AVE
68TH AVE
67TH AVE
MORRISSEY
78TH AVE
ROAD EAST
22ND ST
21ST ST
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
MORRISSEY
LAUREL AVE
SILVE
R AVE
WARD ROAD
CREEK ROAD
INDUSTRIAL
COPP
ER AV
E
RANK
EN AV
E
25TH
ST
20TH ST
17TH ST
CLOSED RD.
27TH
ST
COMO
ST
RIVER ROAD
BEAT
RICE
RD
66TH AVE
65TH AVE
64TH AVE
62ND AVENUE
BARRETT AVE
CYPRESS WAY
25TH STREET
23RD STREET
13TH
STRE
ET
12TH
STRE
ET
11TH STREET
73RD AVE
HUGH
ES RO
AD
DANI
SH RO
AD
24TH
ST
61ST AVE
SPRING CRES
75TH AVENUE
SELKIRK PL.
59TH AVE
GRANBY ROAD
COMO
RO
AD
BIRCH ROAD
72ND AVENUE
WARD
LAKE
RD
REZANSOFF RD
72ND AVE
72ND AVE
VICTORIA WAY
WINNIPEG AVE
66TH AVENUE
65TH AVENUE
VAN NESS WAY
MOUNTAIN PL.
SPRA
GGET
T RD
60TH AVENUE
BRYCEN PLACE
73RD AVE
VINE
STR
EET
PLOT
NIKO
FF RD
KOFTINKOFF RD
19TH ST
19TH ST
HIGHWAY NO 3
2ND STREET
BIRC
H S
TREE
T12TH
ST
REET
PINE V
IEW
CRES
77TH AVE
78TH AVE
67TH AVENUE
68TH AVENUE
HEIGHTS DRIVEHEIGHTS DRIVE
12TH STREET
ALMOND GARDENS
SPRA
GGET
T ROA
D
CENTRAL AVENUE
COOP
ER
ROAD
COMO
ST
REET
KENM
ORE
ROA
D
10TH
ST
REET
66TH AVENUE
23RD STREET22ND STREET
21ST STREET
20TH STREET
19TH STREET 18TH STREET 17TH STREET 16TH STREET
NORT
H FOR
K ROA
D
LONDON ROAD
19TH
ST
REET
18TH
ST
REET
72ND AVENUE
SAND CREEK ROAD
SAND
CRE
EK R
OAD
SAND CREEK
ROAD
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVE
RSID
E DRI
VE
85TH AVENUE
70TH AVENUE
COLUMBIA DRIVE
THIRD ROAD
DONALDSON DRIVE
DONALDSON DRIVE
DONALDSON DRIVE
73RD AVENUE
PERE
VERS
OFF R
OAD
DIVI
SION
ROA
D
8TH STREET
9TH
S
TREE
T
CASCADE BOULEVARD
SIXTH ROAD
76TH AVENUE
CENTRAL AVENUE
COALCHUTE ROAD
18TH
S
TREE
T
17TH
S
TREE
T
SAGAMORE AVENUE
76TH AVENUE
BEVERLEY AVENUE
DARC
Y
RO
AD
21ST STREET
68TH AVENUE
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
82ND AVENUE83RD
AVENUE84TH AVENUE
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
19TH
STRE
ET
McCA
LLUM
VIEW
DRI
VE
McCALLUM VIEW DRIVE
77TH AVE
81ST AVENUE
5TH
STR
EET
78TH AVENUE
80TH A
VENUE
75TH AVENUE
8TH STREET
6TH STREET
5TH STREET
4TH STREET
3RD STREET
2ND STREET
8TH STREET
7TH STREET
6TH STREET
5TH STREET
4TH STREET
3RD STREET
68TH AVENUE
68TH AVENUE
66TH AVENUE
9TH STREET
10TH STREET
27TH STREET
DONALDSON DRIVE
22ND STREET
CORO
NATI
ON
PLA
CE
SAGAMORE AVENUE
BOUN
DARY
DRI
VEBO
UNDA
RY
D
RIVE
75TH
AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
16TH
ST
REET
77TH AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
YALE
MANLY
STREET
AVENUE
GOLDEN
WESTERN CENTRAL
25TH ST
SUNSHINE
SILVE
R AVE
COMO
ST
CREEK ROAD
POPOFF ROAD
13TH STREET
14TH
STRE
ET
65TH AVE
18TH ST
72ND AVENUE
SIXTH ROAD
72ND AVE
HIGHWAY NO 3
JMAYOFF ROAD
GRAN
BY ST
REET
WELLINGTON CR
CENTRAL AVE
LANSDOWNE CRES
11TH STREET
FOURTH ROAD
7TH STREET
CENTRAL AVENUE
COALCHUTE ROAD
KETT
LE RI
VER D
RIVE
79TH AVE
70TH AVENUE
MAPLE STREET
9TH STREET
7TH STREET
2ND STREET
INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
2ND STREET
LAW
RENC
E
STR
EET
10TH STREET
NORT
HFOR
K - F
RANK
LIN R
D
MARKET
AVENUE
81ST AVENUE
6TH STREET
JASPER AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
CENTRAL
AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
SOUTHERN TRANS PROVINCIAL HIGHWAY NO 3
17TH
ST
REET
147-126 May 2009
SanitaryCCTV Inspection
Results
City of Grand ForksUtilities Capital Plan
Legend
300 3000
1:15,000Scale in Metres
Municipal Boundary
!( Manhole
ÏÎ Pump Station
Existing Sanitary Main
High Priority for Upgrade
Val-MarPump Station
BoundaryPump Station
MarlexPump Station
Park Pump Station
Granby Pump Station
Industrial Pump Station
WWTP
Notes:Data compiled by KWL from CCTV based reportsproduced by Panaview Pipe Inspection Servicesbetween 1998-2000.Problems rectified since CCTV inspection completed(ie. section of 77th Ave.) not shown.
Figure 2-2
O:\01
00-01
99\14
7-126
\430-G
IS\M
XD-R
p\147
126F
ig2-2.
mxd
04/05
/2009
@ 2:
42:50
PM
Section 3 Potable Water System
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1
MAY 2009
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. 3-1 Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
3. POTABLE WATER SYSTEM
3.1 EXISTING SYSTEM
The Grand Forks potable water system consists of five groundwater wells located on the west side of the City. Water extracted from the wells is pumped to the East Zone reservoir for storage. This reservoir feeds virtually the entire City. A smaller high-zone reservoir is located nearby at a higher elevation to service the Valley Heights subdivision. Figure 3-1 shows the layout of the Grand Forks water system.
WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
Grand Forks has historically relied on groundwater to meet the City’s water demands. This has generally worked well for the community, although there are some concerns about the potential for future nitrate contamination of some of these wells. Recent engineering analysis has indicated that the City’s current wells could be at risk if the identified nitrate plume should migrate southwards towards the river. A proposal to undertake further analysis of this nitrate concentration and assess associated risks to the existing well field is waiting for funding. The estimated cost of this work in 2007 was $29,200. Recently, a drilling investigation to assess the potential for a new well located near the high school playing field was proposed. The objective of this initiative was to identify locations in which a new well could be constructed to provide additional water supplies for boundary extension or excessive use and also to enhance water quality security, using a new well location away from the known nitrate concentrations located further to the west. The estimated cost for this work was $35,100-$45,100 in 2007. In addition to the above, the need to balance water storage and meet present and future water demands required the City to consider a new reservoir on the west side of the City. The primary benefit of the new reservoir would be to increase fireflow pressures on the west side of the community and improve overall water system security. The current situation, where only one major reservoir serves almost the entire community, makes effective reservoir maintenance challenging and leaves residents somewhat vulnerable to a major pipe system failure. Figure 3-2 and Figure 3-3 illustrate the fireflow contours based on a single reservoir concept (existing scenario) and a two-reservoir concept. This analysis indicates that projected fire flows on the western side of the community are inadequate when fed only from the current reservoir located on the east side of the City. This effect is attributable to elevated friction losses in the long runs of pipe that traverse the City when a major fire occurs.
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1 MAY 2009
3-2 KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD.
Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
KWL proposed in the 2002 Westside Reservoir Predesign Report that a second reservoir be constructed on the west side of the City with a watermain connection to the existing distribution system near 76th Avenue and 23rd Street. If boundary extension occurs toward Copper Field, this location will not be suitable. This would allow the City’s water system to become more balanced in terms of distribution pressure and fireflows, since the west side of the City is farther away from the existing Valley Heights reservoir. KWL completed the pre-design for this new reservoir in 2002. This second reservoir would also provide additional system security should any problem occur with the existing reservoir, as well as enhanced operational flexibility. Funding is required to finance the Westside reservoir either through development charges or from existing ratepayers. The capital cost estimate in 2002 for construction of the Westside reservoir was $2,532,000. It is important to note, however, that water consumption in Grand Forks greatly exceeds typical levels found in similar communities. There is the potential to reduce water consumption via universal metering. This option has not been included as a component of this capital plan but could be considered by the City as an alternative to costly infrastructure upgrades.
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
In general, the backbone of the water distribution system is adequately sized to transmit fireflows under normal operating conditions. However, there are numerous local sections of pipe that are less than 150 mm diameter which could cause flow restrictions under certain conditions. Current industry practice is to install pipes with a minimum diameter of at least 150 mm. Consideration should also be given to looping watermains where possible to eliminate dead ends that can create water quality problems and to improve system security. In terms of pipe materials, there are numerous sections of small diameter galvanized pipe which are generally in poor condition. These sections of pipe have caused problems and thus the priority should be placed on replacing galvanized pipe on a City-wide basis. Figure 3-4 illustrates the locations where the watermain pipe diameter is less than 150 mm or where the pipe material is galvanized. Recent water distribution system upgrades include: design and construction of the Granby River watermain in order to twin the existing
river crossing for enhanced system security (construction completed in 2004); and design and construction of the water chlorination systems to enhance water quality
and thus protect consumer health (construction completed in 2007).
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1
MAY 2009
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. 3-3 Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
WATER CONSERVATION
Implementing water conservation through the adoption of universal metering is a promising option for delaying costly infrastructure capital projects. Other communities that have adopted universal metering programs have experienced reductions in water consumption ranging from 15-30 % of unmetered usage. Since the current water consumption in Grand Forks is relatively high compared to other local communities, it is possible that greater water savings could be achieved. The Grand Forks gross water consumption is estimated to be 1,688 L/cap/day (Source: 2005 City of Grand Forks Drought Management and Conservation Plan), which is significantly higher than the national average of 638 L/cap/day. The capital cost for the implementation of a universal metering program is approximately $1,600,000 (excluding GST).
3.2 CAPITAL PROJECTS
The estimated annual budget for potable water system capital projects is $1.0 million. The following list outlines the capital projects specific to the water system with implementation timeline based on distributing capital projects over time to work within the estimated annual budget: 1. Groundwater Contamination Investigation in Year 1.
As previously indicated, there is significant concern that a groundwater nitrate plume may be migrating towards the existing well field. Should elevated nitrates in the groundwater be detected in any of these wells it would significantly compromise water quality. Assessment of this risk and the identification of potential mitigation measures should be a top priority for the municipality. The projected cost of the initial investigation, based on the March 1st 2007 proposal is $29,200.
2. Groundwater Source Well Investigation in Year 1, with construction of new well
in Years 2-3. It is recommended that the municipality proceed with the investigation of a new well site at the earliest opportunity. A new well would add additional water supply capacity and provide additional system security. The security factor is of particular importance in the light of the nitrate concerns identified above. The estimated cost for this test drilling work was $35,100-$45,100 in 2007. The proposed capital plan provides for test drilling to be undertaken in the first year of the plan with construction to follow in the second year.
3. Replacement of Old Watermains, multi-year programme
It is proposed that the City institute a multi-year programme to replace watermains that are either old, undersized or made of corrosion prone galvanized iron pipe. Since galvanized pipes were typically used only in smaller diameters and have not been installed in recent years, many of these pipes will trigger replacement under all three
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1 MAY 2009
3-4 KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD.
Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
criteria. A phased replacement programme is proposed using the location of these pipes as the primary determinant of the replacement sequence as set out below. A. Replace Old Watermains - pipe age greater than 40 years within downtown core area or adjacent to major institutional facilities.
The highest upgrade priority for the City’s potable water distribution system is to replace all galvanized pipe and watermains less than 150 mm diameter. The locations of these pipes are illustrated in Figure 3-5. In discussions with the City it was noted that galvanized watermain pipes were generally in poor condition and in need of replacement. In terms of small diameter watermain less than 150 mm diameter, the pipes need to be upgraded to provide better fireflows in accordance with the guidelines produced by the Fire Underwriters Society (FUS). It is recommended that the highest priority should be to replace all such mains that serve either commercial or institutional facilities.
B. Replace Old Watermains - pipe age greater than 40 years outside of downtown core area and not serving any major institutional facilities.
This is the next highest priority item for watermain replacement that would follow from Project #3A. C. Replace Old Watermains - pipe age between 20 to 40 years within downtown core area or adjacent to major institutional facilities. This is the next highest priority item for watermain replacement that would follow from Project #3B. D. Replace Old Watermains - pipe age between 20 to 40 years outside of downtown core area and not serving any major institutional facilities. This is the next highest priority item for watermain replacement that would follow from Project #3C.
4. Westside Reservoir Construction
It is proposed that this project should have a slightly lower priority than projects 1 and 2 above. Work should start with implementation of detailed design to be followed by the construction phase. The capital cost estimate in 2002 for construction of the Westside reservoir was $2,532,000.
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1
MAY 2009
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. 3-5 Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
5. Multi-utility upgrading initiatives.
To address water system upgrades in which there are other utilities that can be upgraded at the same time, a reserve amount should be set aside on an annual basis to allow multi-utility upgrade projects to be independently initiated. A more detailed discussion on multi-utility upgrade projects can be found in Section 6 of this report.
6. Miscellaneous projects and minor upgrade work.
A budget amount of $100,000 to $200,000 per year should be reserved for completing miscellaneous projects and minor upgrades to the water system. These include projects such as a unidirectional flushing program, well rehabilitation program, and for preparing water conservation and groundwater well/aquifer protection plans.
3.3 UNIT RATES
The unit rates used to develop the capital budgets for upgrade work are as follows: $300 per lineal metre to replace watermain pipe with 150 mm diameter PVC pipe;
These unit rates have been estimated based on KWL’s recent experience on past projects and is intended for capital planning purposes only.
Project No. Date
ÏÎ
ÏÎÏÎ
ÏÎ
ÏÎ
]
e
]
e
K E T T L E R I V E R
K E T T L E R I V E R
G R A N B YR I V E R
ST
ST
WAY
WAY
7TH
6TH
5TH
4TH
3RD
2ND
1ST
AVE
AVE
WAY
WAY
WAY
R/WR/W
ROAD
ROAD
69TH
68TH
76TH
FORK
CRES
ROAD
ROAD
ROADROAD
66TH
65TH
ROAD
ROAD
LANE
CRES
ROAD
ROADROADLOGAN
FIFTH
BLUFF
FIRST
RIVER DRIVE
RIVER DRIVE
33813
JASPER
AVEN
UE
ANDROS
RANK
ENAV
ENUE
STREET
STREET
STREET
STREET
STREETSTREET
AVENUE
STRE
ET
VALLEY
VALLEY
STREET
SECOND
KONK
EN
AVENUE
AVENUE
KETTLE
KETT
LE
AVENUE
WALNUT
13A
ST
CAMERON
PINE
RD
29TH
ST
13A
ST.
62ND AVE
63RD AVE
REPU
BLIC
G N ROAD
G N
ROAD
72ND AVE
73RD AVE
78TH AVE
71ST AVE
62ND AVE
60TH AVE
79th AVE
ALMA AVE
68TH AVE
MORRISSEY
ROAD EAST
22ND ST
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
MORRISSEY
LAUREL AVE
SILVE
R AVE
WARD ROAD
CREEK ROAD
INDUSTRIAL
COPP
ER AV
E
RANK
EN AV
E
25TH
ST
20TH ST
17TH ST
CLOSED RD.
27TH
ST
COMO
ST
RIVER ROADBEAT
RICE
RD
66TH AVE
65TH AVE
64TH AVE
BARRETT AVE
CYPRESS WAY
25TH STREET
23RD STREET
13TH
STRE
ET
12TH
STRE
ET
11TH STREET
HUGH
ES R
OAD
DANI
SH R
OAD
24TH
ST
61ST AVE
SPRING CRES
75TH AVENUE
SELKIRK PL.
59TH AVE
GRANBY ROAD
BIRCH ROAD
72ND AVENUE
WARD
LAK
E RD
REZANSOFF RD
72ND AVE
VICTORIA WAY
WINNIPEG AVE
66TH AVENUE
65TH AVENUE
VAN NESS WAY
MOUNTAIN PL.
SPRA
GGET
T RD
60TH AVENUE
BRYCEN PLACE
73RD AVE
VINE
STR
EET
PLOT
NIKO
FF R
D
KOFTINKOFF RD
19TH ST
19TH ST
HIGHWAY NO 3
2ND STREET
BIRC
H S
TREE
T
12TH
ST
REET
PINE V
IEW
CRE
S
77TH AVE
78TH AVE
67TH AVENUE
68TH AVENUE
HEIGHTS DRIVE
HEIGHTS DRIVE
12TH STREET
ALMOND GARDENS
SPRA
GGET
T ROA
D
CENTRAL AVENUE
COOP
ER
ROAD
COMO
ST
REET
10TH
ST
REET
66TH AVENUE
23RD STREET22ND STREET
21ST STREET20TH STREET 19TH STREET
18TH STREET
17TH STREET
16TH STREET
NORT
H FOR
K ROA
D
LONDON ROAD
19TH
ST
REET
18TH
ST
REET
72ND AVENUE
SAND CREEK ROAD
SAND CREE
K ROAD
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVE
RSID
E DRI
VE
85TH AVENUE
70TH AVENUE
COLUMBIA DRIVE
THIRD ROAD
DONALDSON DRIVE
DONALDSON DRIVE
DONALDSON DRIVE
73RD AVENUE
PERE
VERS
OFF R
OAD
DIVI
SION
ROA
D
9TH
S
TREE
T
CASCADE BOULEVARD
SIXTH ROAD
76TH AVENUE
CENTRAL AVENUE
COALCHUTE ROAD
SAGAMORE AVENUE
76TH AVENUE
BEVERLEY AVENUE
DARC
Y
RO
AD
68TH AVENUE
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
82ND AVENUE
83RD AVENUE
84TH AVENUE
19TH
STRE
ET
McCA
LLUM
VIE
W D
RIVE
McCALLUM VIEW DRIVE
81ST AVENUE
5TH
STR
EET
80TH A
VENUE
75TH AVENUE
4TH STREET3RD STREET
2ND STREET
8TH STREET7TH STREET
6TH STREET
4TH STREET3RD STREET
68TH AVENUE
68TH AVENUE
66TH AVENUE
9TH STREET
10TH STREET
22ND STREET
CORO
NATI
ON
PLA
CE
SAGAMORE AVENUE
BOUN
DARY
DRI
VEBO
UNDA
RY
D
RIVE
75TH
AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
16TH
ST
REET
77TH AVENUE
76TH
PARK
YALE
MANLY
NORTH
STREET
AVENUE
GOLDEN
WESTERN CENTRAL
25TH ST
DOW
EDOF
F
SUNSHINE
71ST AVE
67TH AVE
78TH AVE
21ST ST
SILVE
R AVE
COMO
ST
CREEK ROAD
62ND AVENUE
POPOFF ROAD
13TH STREET
14TH
STRE
ET
73RD AVE
65TH AVE
18TH ST
72ND AVENUE
COMO
RO
AD
SIXTH ROAD
72ND AVE
72ND AVE
HIGHWAY NO 3
JMAYOFF ROAD
GRAN
BY ST
REET
WELLINGTON CR
CENTRAL AVE
LANSDOWNE CRES
11TH STREET
FOURTH ROAD
KENM
ORE
ROA
D
SAND
CRE
EK R
OAD
8TH STREET7TH STREET
CENTRAL AVENUE
18TH
S
TREE
T
17TH
S
TREE
T
COALCHUTE ROAD
21ST STREET
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
KETT
LE R
IVER
DRI
VE
77TH AVE
79TH AVE
78TH AVENUE
70TH AVENUE
MAPLE STREET
9TH STREET8TH STREET
7TH STREET6TH STREET
5TH STREET
5TH STREET
2ND STREET
INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
2ND STREET
LAW
RENC
E
STR
EET
10TH STREET
27TH STREET
NORT
HFOR
K - F
RANK
LIN
RD
MARKET
AVENUE
81ST AVENUE
DONALDSON DRIVE
6TH STREET
JASPER AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
CENTRAL
AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
SOUTHERN TRANS PROVINCIAL HIGHWAY NO 3
17TH
ST
REET
75TH
AVENUE
147-126 May 2009
Existing PotableWater System
City of Grand ForksUtilities Capital Plan
Legend
300 3000
1:15,000Scale in Metres
Municipal Boundary
]
e Reservoir
ÏÎ Well
Watermain
Well No. 2
Well No. 3
Well No. 3A Well No. 4
Well No. 5
East SideReservoir
Valley HeightsReservoir
Figure 3-1
Map D
ocum
ent: (
O:\01
00-01
99\14
7-126
\430-G
IS\MX
D-Rp
\1471
26Fig
3-1.m
xd)
24/04
/2009
-- 6:4
5:17 A
M
Project No. Date
ÏÎ
ÏÎ
ÏÎÏÎ
ÏÎ
ÏÎ
"
e
"
e
"
e
"
e
"
e
"
e
"
e
6
7
8
9
2
34
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2
66TH
68 TH
76
75TH
68TH
70TH
72TH
24 TH
25 TH
23 RD
22 ND
21
20 TH
75TH
77TH
78TH
19
72
18 TH
17
16
66
67TH
29TH
19
78 TH
81ST
17TH
16
77 TH
62 ND
61ST
60
19 18
12
59TH
61
66
65
64 TH
10 TH
63 RD
62 ND
65TH
66
67 TH
71
14TH
72 ND
73 RD
13
72ND
75TH
73RD
76TH
NDRD
TH
10
11
12
69 TH
68
ND
RD
65 TH
PL
ND
85
84TH
83
82
81
TH
79
78 TH
77 TH
76TH
78
18
ST.
ST.
WAY
ST.
ST.
ROAD
ROAD
VIEW
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
PARK
AVE.
VINE
ROAD
ROAD
NO.3
SAND
ROAD
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
ROAD
ROAD
AVE.
DRIVE
RIVER DRIVE
RIVER DRIVE
DRIVE
CRES.
DRIVE
DRIVE
RIVE
RDR
IVE
DRIVE
DRIVE
CRES
.CR
ES.
UNION
BIRCH
CREEK
BLUFF
DRIVE
DRIV
E
PLAC
E
ALMOND
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
STREET
STREET
STREET
STREET
STREET
STREET
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUEAVENUE
STREET
AVENUE
STREET
STREET
STREET
AVENUE
KETTLE
KETTLE
AVENUE
STRE
ET AVENUE
STRE
ET STRE
ET
AVENUE
AVENUE
STRE
ET
STRE
ET
AVENUE
AVENUEAVENUE
JASPER AVENUE
AVENUE
STREET
STREETST
REET
KETTLE
STRE
ET
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
STREET
STREET
STREET
STREET
STREETSTREETSTREET
STREETSTREET
AVENUE
AVENUE
STREETSTREETSTREETSTREETSTREETSTREETSTREET
AVENUE
AVENUE
MARIO
N
AVENUE
STRE
ET
STREET
GRANBYSTREET
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
G.N RD
STRE
ET
GARDENS
CENTRAL
CENTRAL
CENTRAL
BEVERLY
CENTRAL
CASCADE
KENM
ORE
CAMERON
HIGHWAY
McCALLUM
COLUMBIA
COMO
ST.
COMO
ST.
SAGAMORE
LAW
RENC
E
BOUNDARY
DONALDSON
DONALDSON
COALSHUTE
PINE V
IEW
LOGAN ST.
DONALDSON
RIVERSIDE
BOULEVARD
CROWSNEST
RIVE
RSID
E
WARD ROAD
SIXTH RD.
FIFTH RD.
THIRD RD.
FIRST RD.
GARM
AN ST
.
INDUSTRIAL
GOLDEN WAY
ANDRES RD.
FOURTH RD.
SECOND RD.
CORO
NATI
ON
DANI
SH RO
AD
NESB
ITT S
T.LA
NGHA
M ST
.
OSBORNE ST.
STUART AVE.BARRET AVE.
BRIDGE AVE.
LONDON ROAD
MAPLE STREET
VICTORIA WAY
CENTRAL CES.
WINNIPEG AVE.
KOFTINOFF RD.
WELLINGTON CR.
PERE
VERS
OFF R
OAD
LANDSDOWNE CRES.
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
McCA
LLUM
VIEW
DRI
VE
GRAND FORKS AIRPORT
MORRISSEY CREEK ROAD
VALLEY HEIGHTS DRIVE
VALLEY HEIGHTS DRIVE
CROWSNEST HIGHWAY NO.3
CROWSNEST HIGHWAY NO.3
SOUTHERN TRANS-PROVINCIAL HIGHWAY
45
6075
90
105
30
120135
150165
180
195
210
225
240
15
30
30
90
15
105
75
45
45
30
90105
60
30195
45
30
45
45
150
90
225
15
60
60
60
180
75
120
30
30
120
210
105
120
75
30
75
180
75
15
165 150
15
75
45
135
105
60
15
240
90
45
15
90
105
45
75
45
60
45
105
60
607590
30
165
75
75
30
90
105
60
15
Fireflow ContoursExisting SystemOne Reservoir
Eastside Reservoir
Well No.3
Well No.2
ProposedWell No.6
Well No.5
Well No.4
"
e Supply SourceÏÎ Pump Station
Water MainFireflow Contours (L/s)
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240
Note:Contours show maximum fireflow contours at a minimum of 20 psi with no negative zone pressures.
Well No.3a
147-126 May 2009
300 3000
1:15,000Scale in Metres
City of Grand ForksUtilities Capital Plan
Figure 3-2
Legend
O:\01
00-01
99\14
7-126
\430-G
IS\M
XD-R
p\147
126F
ig3-2.
mxd
04/05
/2009
@ 2:
48:39
PM
6
7
8
9
2
34
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2
66TH
68 TH
76
75TH
68TH
70TH
72TH
24 TH
25 TH
23 RD
22 ND
21
20 TH
75TH
77TH
78TH
19
72
18 TH
17
16
66
67 TH
29TH
19
78 TH
81ST
17TH
16
77 TH
62 ND
61ST
60
19 18
12
59TH
61
66
65
64 TH
10 TH63 RD
62 ND
65TH
66
67 TH
71
14TH
72 ND
73 RD
13
72ND
75TH
73RD
76TH
NDRD
TH
10
11
12
69 TH
68
ND
RD
65 TH
PL
ND
85
84TH
83
82
81
TH
79
78 TH
77 TH
76TH
78
18
ST.
ST.
WAY
ST.
ST.
ROAD
ROAD
VIEW
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
PARK
AVE.
VINE
ROAD
ROAD
NO.3
SAND
ROAD
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
ROAD
ROAD
AVE.
DRIVE
RIVER DRIVE
RIVER DRIVE
DRIVE
CRES.
DRIVE
DRIVE
RIVE
RDR
IVE
DRIVE
DRIVE
CRES
.CR
ES.
UNION
BIRCH
CREEK
BLUFF
DRIVE
DRIV
E
PLAC
E
ALMOND
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
STREET
STREET
STREET
STREET
STREET
STREET
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUEAVENUE
STREET
AVENUE
STREET
STREET
STREET
AVENUE
KETTLE
KETTLE
AVENUE
STRE
ET AVENUE
STRE
ET STRE
ET
AVENUE
AVENUE
STRE
ET
STRE
ET
AVENUE
AVENUEAVENUE
JASPER AVENUE
AVENUE
STREET
STREETST
REET
KETTLE
STRE
ET
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
STREET
STREET
STREET
STREET
STREETSTREETSTREET
STREETSTREET
AVENUE
AVENUE
STREETSTREETSTREETSTREETSTREETSTREETSTREET
AVENUE
AVENUE
MARIO
N
AVENUE
STRE
ET
STREET
GRANBYSTREET
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
G.N RD
STRE
ET
GARDENS
CENTRAL
CENTRAL
CENTRAL
BEVERLY
CENTRAL
CASCADE
KENM
ORE
CAMERON
HIGHWAY
McCALLUMCOLUMBIA
COMO
ST.
COMO
ST.
SAGAMORE
LAW
RENC
E
BOUNDARY
DONALDSON
DONALDSON
COALSHUTE
PINE V
IEW
LOGAN ST.
DONALDSON
RIVERSIDE
BOULEVARD
CROWSNEST
RIVE
RSID
E
WARD ROAD
SIXTH RD.
FIFTH RD.
THIRD RD.
FIRST RD.
GARM
AN ST
.
INDUSTRIAL
GOLDEN WAY
ANDRES RD.
FOURTH RD.
SECOND RD.
CORO
NATI
ON
DANI
SH RO
AD
NESB
ITT S
T.LA
NGHA
M ST
.
OSBORNE ST.
STUART AVE.BARRET AVE.
BRIDGE AVE.
LONDON ROAD
MAPLE STREET
VICTORIA WAY
CENTRAL CES.
WINNIPEG AVE.
KOFTINOFF RD.
WELLINGTON CR.
PERE
VERS
OFF R
OAD
LANDSDOWNE CRES.
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
McCA
LLUM
VIEW
DRI
VE
GRAND FORKS AIRPORT
MORRISSEY CREEK ROAD
VALLEY HEIGHTS DRIVE
VALLEY HEIGHTS DRIVE
CROWSNEST HIGHWAY NO.3
CROWSNEST HIGHWAY NO.3SOUTHERN TRANS-PROVINCIAL HIGHWAY
90
75105
195
180
225
240
135
45
165
150
120
30
60
210
15
150
165
30180
15015
30
30
90
120
120
75
225
135
60
90
45
60
180
45
30
75
15
240
15
45
120
45
135
210
75
45
195
30
195
150
60
225
75
120
105
150
30
90
45
240
225
120
60
135
30
15
90
210
90
150
105
150
135
90
90
165
45
180165
120
75
150
105 120
15
165
15
90
30
210 240
120
60
240
210
60
180
105
60
225
135
105
45
30
135
135
60 75
75
195
240
45
45
105
165
225
13575
30
210
Project No. Date147-126 May 2009
Fireflow ContoursProposed Two
Reservoir Concept
City of Grand ForksUtilities Capital Plan
Eastside Reservoir
Well No.3
Well No.2
ProposedWell No.6
Well No.5
Well No.4
WestsideReservoir
Supply SourcePump StationWater Main
Fireflow Contours (L/s)0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240
Well No.3a
300 3000
1:15,000Scale in Metres
Legend
Figure 3-3
Note:Contours show maximum fireflow contours at a minimum of 20 psi with no negative zone pressures.Westside Reservoir location as shown in this figure only valid if the boundary extension to include Copper Ridge does not occur.
*
**
**
*
Map D
ocum
ent: (
O:\01
00-01
99\14
7-126
\430-G
IS\MX
D-Rp
\1471
26Fig
3-3.m
xd)
15/05
/2009
-- 9:5
0:23 A
M
Project No. Date
ÏÎ
ÏÎÏÎ
ÏÎ
ÏÎ
]
e
]
e
K E T T L E R I V E R
K E T T L E R I V E R
G R A N B YR I V E R
ST
ST
WAY
WAY
7TH
6TH
5TH
4TH
3RD
2ND
1ST
AVE
AVE
WAY
WAY
WAY
R/W
R/W
ROAD
ROAD
69TH
68TH
76TH
76TH
FORK
CRES
PARK
ROAD
ROAD
ROADROAD
66TH
65TH
ROAD
ROAD
LANE
CRES
ROAD
ROADROAD
LOGAN
FIFTH
NORTH
BLUFF
FIRST
RIVER DRIVE
RIVER DRIVE
33813
JASPER
AVEN
UE
ANDROS
RANK
ENAV
ENUE
STREETSTREETSTREETSTREETSTREET
STREET
AVENUE
STRE
ET
VALLEY
VALLEY
STREET
SECOND
KONK
EN
AVENUE
AVENUE
KETTLE
KETT
LE
AVENUE
WALNUT
13A S
T
CAMERON
PINE R
D
29TH
ST
13A S
T.
62ND AVE
63RD AVE
REPU
BLIC
G N ROAD
G N
ROAD
72ND AVE
73RD AVE
78TH AVE
71ST AVE
DOWE
DOFF
62ND AVE
60TH AVE
71ST AVE
79th AVE
ALMA AVE
68TH AVE
67TH AVE
MORRISSEY
78TH AVE
ROAD EAST
22ND ST
21ST ST
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
MORRISSEY
LAUREL AVE
SILVE
R AVE
WARD ROAD
CREEK ROAD
INDUSTRIAL
COPP
ER AV
E
RANK
EN AV
E
25TH
ST
20TH ST
17TH ST
CLOSED RD.
27TH
ST
COMO
ST
RIVER ROAD
BEAT
RICE
RD
66TH AVE
65TH AVE
64TH AVE
62ND AVENUE
BARRETT AVE
CYPRESS WAY
25TH STREET
23RD STREET
13TH
STRE
ET
12TH
STRE
ET
11TH STREET
73RD AVE
HUGH
ES RO
AD
DANI
SH RO
AD
24TH
ST
61ST AVE
SPRING CRES
75TH AVENUE
SELKIRK PL.
59TH AVE
GRANBY ROAD
COMO
RO
AD
BIRCH ROAD
72ND AVENUE
WARD
LAKE
RD
REZANSOFF RD
72ND AVE
72ND AVE
VICTORIA WAY
WINNIPEG AVE
66TH AVENUE
65TH AVENUE
VAN NESS WAY
MOUNTAIN PL.
SPRA
GGET
T RD
60TH AVENUE
BRYCEN PLACE
73RD AVE
VINE
STR
EET
PLOT
NIKO
FF RD
KOFTINKOFF RD
19TH ST
19TH ST
HIGHWAY NO 3
2ND STREET
BIRC
H S
TREE
T12TH
ST
REET
PINE V
IEW
CRES
77TH AVE
78TH AVE
67TH AVENUE
68TH AVENUE
HEIGHTS DRIVEHEIGHTS DRIVE
12TH STREET
ALMOND GARDENS
SPRA
GGET
T ROA
D
CENTRAL AVENUE
COOP
ER
ROAD
COMO
ST
REET
KENM
ORE
ROA
D
10TH
ST
REET
66TH AVENUE
23RD STREET22ND STREET
21ST STREET
20TH STREET
19TH STREET 18TH STREET 17TH STREET 16TH STREET
NORT
H FOR
K ROA
D
LONDON ROAD
19TH
ST
REET
18TH
ST
REET
72ND AVENUE
SAND CREEK ROAD
SAND
CRE
EK R
OAD
SAND CREEK
ROAD
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVE
RSID
E DRI
VE
85TH AVENUE
70TH AVENUE
COLUMBIA DRIVE
THIRD ROAD
DONALDSON DRIVE
DONALDSON DRIVE
DONALDSON DRIVE
73RD AVENUE
PERE
VERS
OFF R
OAD
DIVI
SION
ROA
D
8TH STREET
9TH
S
TREE
T
CASCADE BOULEVARD
SIXTH ROAD
76TH AVENUE
CENTRAL AVENUE
COALCHUTE ROAD
18TH
S
TREE
T
17TH
S
TREE
T
SAGAMORE AVENUE
76TH AVENUE
BEVERLEY AVENUE
DARC
Y
RO
AD
21ST STREET
68TH AVENUE
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
82ND AVENUE83RD
AVENUE84TH AVENUE
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
19TH
STRE
ET
McCA
LLUM
VIEW
DRI
VE
McCALLUM VIEW DRIVE
77TH AVE
81ST AVENUE
5TH
STR
EET
78TH AVENUE
80TH A
VENUE
75TH AVENUE
8TH STREET
6TH STREET
5TH STREET
4TH STREET
3RD STREET
2ND STREET
8TH STREET
7TH STREET
6TH STREET
5TH STREET
4TH STREET
3RD STREET
68TH AVENUE
68TH AVENUE
66TH AVENUE
9TH STREET
10TH STREET
27TH STREET
DONALDSON DRIVE
22ND STREET
CORO
NATI
ON
PLA
CE
SAGAMORE AVENUE
BOUN
DARY
DRI
VEBO
UNDA
RY
D
RIVE
75TH
AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
16TH
ST
REET
77TH AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
YALE
MANLY
STREET
AVENUE
GOLDEN
WESTERN CENTRAL
25TH ST
SUNSHINE
SILVE
R AVE
COMO
ST
CREEK ROAD
POPOFF ROAD
13TH STREET
14TH
STRE
ET
65TH AVE
18TH ST
72ND AVENUE
SIXTH ROAD
72ND AVE
HIGHWAY NO 3
JMAYOFF ROAD
GRAN
BY ST
REET
WELLINGTON CR
CENTRAL AVE
LANSDOWNE CRES
11TH STREET
FOURTH ROAD
7TH STREET
CENTRAL AVENUE
COALCHUTE ROAD
KETT
LE RI
VER D
RIVE
79TH AVE
70TH AVENUE
MAPLE STREET
9TH STREET
7TH STREET
2ND STREET
INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
2ND STREET
LAW
RENC
E
STR
EET
10TH STREET
NORT
HFOR
K - F
RANK
LIN R
D
MARKET
AVENUE
81ST AVENUE
6TH STREET
JASPER AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
CENTRAL
AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
SOUTHERN TRANS PROVINCIAL HIGHWAY NO 3
17TH
ST
REET
147-126 May 2009
ExistingWater SystemPipe Age
City of Grand ForksUtilities Capital Plan
Legend
300 3000
1:15,000Scale in Metres
Municipal Boundary
]
e
Reservoir
ÏÎ WellPipe Age
0 - 20 Years
20 - 40 Years
> 40 Years
Unknown
Galvanized Pipe
Well No. 2
Well No. 3
Well No. 3A Well No. 4
Well No. 5
East SideReservoir
Valley HeightsReservoir
Figure 3-4
O:\01
00-01
99\14
7-126
\430-G
IS\M
XD-R
p\147
126F
ig3-4.
mxd
04/05
/2009
@ 2:
56:56
PM
Project No. Date
]
e
]
e
K E T T L E R I V E R
K E T T L E R I V E R
G R A N B YR I V E R
101
65
21
154
164
5867
28
229
216
54
231
105
308
111
146148
235
162
309
202
194
203
253
307
97
163
165
102
153
217
84
85
215
386
180
443
64
53
87
107
305
277
152
201
199
312
198
178
218
161
245
169
179
382
200
383
362
207
159
364
399
211
172 363
385
250
158
166
422
88
18
368
19
429
437
206
175
420
390384
176
381
283
100
210
273
288
290
421
426
177
359
20
254
61
173
90
331
441
436
62
282
151
ST
ST
WAY
WAY
7TH
6TH
5TH
3RD
1ST
AVE
AVE
WAY
WAY
WAY
R/W
R/W
ROAD
ROAD
69TH
68TH
76TH
76TH
FORK
CRES
ROAD
ROAD
ROADROAD
66TH
65TH
ROAD
LANE
CRES
ROAD
ROADROAD
LOGAN
FIFTH
NORTH
BLUFF
FIRST
RIVER
RIVER DRIVE
33813
JASPER
AVEN
UE
ANDROS
RANK
ENAV
ENUE
STREETSTREETSTREETSTREETSTREET
STREET
STRE
ET
VALLEY
VALLEY
STREET
SECOND
KONK
EN
AVENUE
AVENUE
KETTLE
KETT
LE
AVENUE
WALNUT
CAMERON
PINE R
D
29TH
ST
25TH ST
13A S
T.
62ND AVE
REPU
BLIC
G N ROAD
G N
ROAD
72ND AVE
78TH AVE
71ST AVE
DOWE
DOFF
62ND AVE
60TH AVE
71ST AVE
79th AVE
ALMA AVE
MORRISSEY
78TH AVE
ROAD EAST
22ND ST
21ST ST
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
MORRISSEY
LAUREL AVE
SILVE
R AVE
WARD ROAD
CREEK ROAD
INDUSTRIAL
COPP
ER AV
E
RANK
EN AV
E
25TH
ST
CLOSED RD.
27TH
ST
COMO
ST
COMO
ST
RIVER ROAD
BEAT
RICE
RD
66TH AVE
65TH AVE
64TH AVE
BARRETT AVE
CYPRESS WAY
13TH STREET
25TH STREET
23RD STREET
14TH
STRE
ET
13TH
STRE
ET
12TH
STRE
ET
11TH STREET
HUGH
ES RO
AD
DANI
SH RO
AD
24TH
ST
18TH ST
61ST AVE
SPRING CRES
75TH AVENUE
SELKIRK PL.
59TH AVE
GRANBY ROAD
COMO
RO
AD
BIRCH ROAD
WARD
LAKE
RD
REZANSOFF RD
72ND AVE
VICTORIA WAY
WINNIPEG AVE
65TH AVENUE
VAN NESS WAY
MOUNTAIN PL.
SPRA
GGET
T RD
60TH AVENUE
VINE
STR
EET
PLOT
NIKO
FF RD
KOFTINKOFF RD
19TH ST
HIGHWAY NO 3
2ND STREET
BIRC
H S
TREE
T12TH
ST
REET
PINE V
IEW
CRES
77TH AVE
78TH AVE
68TH AVENUE
HEIGHTS DRIVEHEIGHTS DRIVE
12TH STREET
ALMOND GARDENS
SPRA
GGET
T ROA
D
CENTRAL AVENUE
COOP
ER
ROAD
KENM
ORE
ROA
D
10TH
ST
REET
66TH AVENUE
22ND STREET
20TH STREET
16TH STREET
NORT
H FOR
K ROA
D
LONDON ROAD
19TH
ST
REET
18TH
ST
REET
72ND AVENUE
SAND CREEK ROAD
SAND
CRE
EK R
OAD
SAND CREEK
ROAD
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVE
RSID
E DRI
VE
85TH AVENUE
70TH AVENUE
COLUMBIA DRIVE
THIRD ROAD
DONALDSON DRIVE
DONALDSON DRIVE
73RD AVENUE
PERE
VERS
OFF R
OAD
DIVI
SION
ROA
D
8TH STREET
9TH
S
TREE
T
CASCADE BOULEVARD
SIXTH ROAD
CENTRAL AVENUE
COALCHUTE ROAD
18TH
S
TREE
T
17TH
S
TREE
T
SAGAMORE AVENUE
76TH AVENUE
BEVERLEY AVENUE
DARC
Y
RO
AD
68TH AVENUE
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
19TH
STRE
ET
McCA
LLUM
VIEW
DRI
VE
77TH AVE
5TH
STR
EET
78TH AVENUE
75TH AVENUE
8TH STREET
6TH STREET
5TH STREET
4TH STREET
8TH STREET
7TH STREET
5TH STREET
4TH STREET
68TH AVENUE
66TH AVENUE
9TH STREET
27TH STREET
81ST AVENUE
DONALDSON DRIVE
CORO
NATI
ON
PLA
CE
SAGAMORE AVENUE
BOUN
DARY
DRI
VEBO
UNDA
RY
D
RIVE
16TH
ST
REET
77TH AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
160
423
389
258
459
278
274
388
272
174
205
92
149
484
425
289
472
292
204
439
332
433
428
233234
4TH
2ND
PARKROAD
YALE
MANLY
DRIVE
STREET
AVENUE
AVENUE
GOLDEN
13A S
T
WESTERN CENTRAL
63RD AVE
73RD AVE
SUNSHINE
68TH AVE
67TH AVE
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
SILVE
R AVE
20TH ST
17TH ST
CREEK ROAD
62ND AVENUE
POPOFF ROAD
73RD AVE
65TH AVE72ND AVENUE
SIXTH ROAD
72ND AVENUE
72ND AVE
72ND AVE
66TH AVENUE
HIGHWAY NO 3
BRYCEN PLACE
73RD AVE
JMAYOFF ROAD
GRAN
BY ST
REET
WELLINGTON CR
19TH ST
CENTRAL AVE
LANSDOWNE CRES
67TH AVENUE
11TH STREET
FOURTH ROAD
COMO
ST
REET
23RD STREET
21ST STREET
19TH STREET 18TH STREET 17TH STREET
DONALDSON DRIVE
7TH STREET
76TH AVENUE
CENTRAL AVENUE
COALCHUTE ROAD
21ST STREET
82ND AVENUE83RD
AVENUE84TH AVENUE
KETT
LE RI
VER D
RIVE
McCALLUM VIEW DRIVE
79TH AVE
81ST AVENUE
70TH AVENUE
80TH A
VENUE
MAPLE STREET
9TH STREET
7TH STREET
3RD STREET
2ND STREET
6TH STREET
3RD STREET
2ND STREET
68TH AVENUE
INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
2ND STREET
LAW
RENC
E
STR
EET
10TH STREET
10TH STREET
NORT
HFOR
K - F
RANK
LIN R
D
MARKET
AVENUE
6TH STREET
JASPER AVENUE
22ND STREET
75TH
AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
CENTRAL
AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
SOUTHERN TRANS PROVINCIAL HIGHWAY NO 3
17TH
ST
REET
147-126 May 2009
ExistingWater System
Pipe ReplacementPriorities
City of Grand ForksUtilities Capital Plan
Legend
300 3000
1:15,000Scale in Metres
Municipal Boundary
]
e
Reservoir
Existing Watermain
High Priority to ReplaceEast SideReservoir
Valley HeightsReservoir
Figure 3-5
Main ID
O:\01
00-01
99\14
7-126
\430-G
IS\M
XD-R
p\147
126F
ig3-5.
mxd
05/05
/2009
@ 11
:14:29
AM
Section 4 Stormwater System
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1
MAY 2009
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. 4-1 Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
4. STORMWATER SYSTEM
4.1 EXISTING SYSTEM
Drainage problems in Grand Forks have historically been treated as a secondary infrastructure issue within Grand Forks. Accordingly there has been very little engineering work undertaken to date on this utility system. However, the report A Look Beyond the Year 2000: Summary Report on Planning for Future Growth (KWL, 1994) introduced the concept of intercepting and controlling the discharge of surface runoff (whether due to stormwater or snowmelt) to meet the demands of future land development.
4.2 EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM
Grand Forks is located at the confluence of the Granby and Kettle rivers. The Kettle River is the dominating feature with respect to drainage for the following reasons: The valley is flat and low-lying, and the groundwater table is hydrogeologically
controlled by river level. There are some problem areas where land is vulnerable to flooding under extreme
high river water conditions. The river is the natural outlet for storm drainage facilities.
Figure 4-1 provides an overview of the existing stormwater management system at Grand Forks. There are two small watercourses within the City which drain to the Kettle River; namely: Zak’s Slough, and the Pahoda/Holiboff Slough. Additionally, there are four areas which are serviced with storm sewer systems to address site-specific problems. These areas are the West Side Area, Central Avenue, Downtown Core, and East Side Bench. This system has historically served the community adequately even though many of the storm drainage pipes are undersized when compared to normal design standards. This is due to the very high infiltration capacity of the underlying soils. In the 1994 KWL report on the A Look Beyond the Year 2000: Summary Report on Planning for Future Growth, the following implementation strategy was recommended for consideration: Construct storm sewers along Granby Road and Boundary Drive during road
reconstruction; Upgrade stormwater infrastructure downstream of Central Avenue;
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1 MAY 2009
4-2 KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD.
Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
Construct a new drainage outlet that would serve the bench area west of the CPR, with proposed discharge to the Johnston Flats wetland area;
Confirm the need to upsize the East Side drainage outlet; and Upsize the Zak Slough drainage outlet as a condition for future subdivision approval
for development in the area behind the high school. The above recommendations were made over 15 years ago within the context of an overview level assessment of the City’s infrastructure and no follow up has since been undertaken. This is in sharp contrast to other municipal systems, which have received ongoing engineering analysis and variety of significant upgrades since that time. It is therefore proposed that a focussed Stormwater Management Plan be prepared in order to provide a solid foundation for future investment in this important utility.
4.3 CAPITAL PROJECTS
1. Prepare Stormwater Management Plan It is not possible to prioritize the upgrade work required for the stormwater system without an appropriate Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP). It is recommended as the highest priority item for the stormwater utility that a SWMP be prepared covering the following items: Inventory and base mapping of the existing drainage system (catch basins, storm
sewers, culverts, bridges, ditches, overland flow paths); Identification of flooding and erosion problems; Soils mapping, watercourse mapping and classification information; Analysis of conveyance capacities and identification of system inadequacies; Recommend and prioritize improvements and upgrades where required; Assess potential for stormwater runoff causing groundwater contamination and make
mitigation recommendations; and Assess and make recommendations for stormwater quality control and environmental
protection of watercourses by assessing frequently occurring events and riparian setbacks.
A budget allowance of $60,000 is proposed for this work. 2. Implement Capital Projects Outlined in Stormwater Management Plan
Once the stormwater management plan has been completed, implementation of the capital projects recommended in the plan should be included in the capital plan as an annual capital programme. A budget of $1.0M per year has been included for implementation of this strategy. It should be noted that it is possible that the results from the stormwater management plan will indicate that this level of annual investment may be excessive for this utility.
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1
MAY 2009
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. 4-3 Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
3. Miscellaneous projects and minor upgrade work. A budget amount of $100,000 to $200,000 per year should be reserved for completing miscellaneous projects and minor upgrades to the stormwater system. Based on currently available information, it does not appear to be appropriate to include a separate annual budget for this utility under the Multi-Utility Upgrading programme.
Section 5 Road Infrastructure
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1
MAY 2009
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. 5-1 Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
5. ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE
5.1 EXISTING ROAD SYSTEM
In 2000, the City commissioned a road rehabilitation study undertaken by Emcon. The study included road surface assessment, road allowance condition assessment, road subsurface assessment, road maintenance planning map, and data base entry. Emcon rated the existing roads and divided them into high, medium and low rehabilitation priority. A graphical representation of the City’s road network is shown in Figure 5-1.
5.2 SIDEWALKS
The existing sidewalk infrastructure and proposed upgrades are shown in Figure 5-2. Over the life of the capital plan, $500,000 has been set aside to incorporate new additions to the sidewalk infrastructure. Repair and reconstruction of sidewalks should be included as part of the associated road reconstruction work.
5.3 CAPITAL PROJECTS
The estimated annual budget for road infrastructure capital projects is $1.0 million. The following list outlines the capital projects specific to the road network with an implementation timeline based on distributing capital projects over time to work within the estimated annual budget: 1. Upgrade High Priority Roads.
The priority for road repaving in Grand Forks is illustrated in Figure 5-3. This figure was originally created using the information from the Emcon report and updated. In determining the priority of road upgrades, consideration was given to both the assessed current condition of the pavement and traffic volumes. High Priority Roads: 22nd Street from Central Avenue to 78th Avenue
Kettle River Drive from 68th Avenue to 72nd Avenue
68th Avenue from Boundary Drive to Kettle River Drive
68th Avenue from 19th Street to Boundary Drive
Donaldson Drive from Boundary Drive to Central Avenue
3rd Street from Central Avenue to North of 75th Avenue
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1 MAY 2009
5-2 KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD.
Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
2. Upgrade Medium Priority Roads. Medium Priority Roads: 2nd Street from Central Avenue to 2nd Street Bridge
73rd Avenue from Boundary Drive to 11th Street
73rd Avenue from 11th Street to 9th Street
2nd Street from 68th Avenue to Sagamore Road
14th Street from 68th Avenue to 66th Avenue
67th Avenue from Kettle River Drive to Boundary Drive
66th Avenue from Kettle River Drive to Boundary Drive
66th Avenue from Boundary Drive to 19th Street 3. Multi-utility Upgrading Initiatives.
To address road infrastructure upgrades in which there are other utilities that can be upgraded at the same time, a reserve amount should be set aside on an annual basis to allow multi-utility upgrade projects to be independently initiated. A more detailed discussion on multi-utility upgrade projects can be found in Section 6 of this report.
4. Miscellaneous Projects and Minor Upgrade Work.
A budget amount of $100,000 to $200,000 per year should be reserved for completing miscellaneous projects and minor upgrades to the road infrastructure system.
5.4 UNIT RATES
The unit rates used to develop the capital budgets for road upgrade work are as follows: $50 per square metre for asphalt road paving; $150 per lineal metre for curb restoration; and $60 per square metre for sidewalk construction.
These unit rates have been estimated based on KWL’s recent experience on past projects and is intended for capital planning purposes only. It is recommended that the City consider a contingency amount to account for upgrade work that may need to be done on an emergency basis.
Project No. Date
K E T T L E R I V E R
K E T T L E R I V E R
G R A N B YR I V E R
ST
ST
WAY
WAY
7TH
6TH
5TH
4TH
3RD
2ND
1ST
AVE
AVE
WAY
WAY
WAY
R/W
R/W
ROAD
ROAD
69TH
68TH
76TH
76TH
FORK
CRES
PARK
ROAD
ROAD
ROADROAD
66TH
65TH
ROAD
ROAD
LANE
CRES
ROAD
ROADROAD
LOGAN
FIFTH
NORTH
BLUFF
FIRST
RIVER DRIVE
RIVER DRIVE
33813
JASPER
AVEN
UE
ANDROS
RANK
ENAV
ENUE
STREETSTREETSTREETSTREETSTREET
STREET
AVENUE
STRE
ET
VALLEY
VALLEY
STREET
SECOND
KONK
EN
AVENUE
AVENUE
KETTLE
KETT
LE
AVENUE
WALNUT
13A S
T
CAMERON
PINE R
D
29TH
ST
13A S
T.
62ND AVE
63RD AVE
REPU
BLIC
G N ROAD
G N
ROAD
72ND AVE
73RD AVE
78TH AVE
71ST AVE
DOWE
DOFF
62ND AVE
60TH AVE
71ST AVE
79th AVE
ALMA AVE
68TH AVE
67TH AVE
MORRISSEY
78TH AVE
ROAD EAST
22ND ST
21ST ST
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
MORRISSEY
LAUREL AVE
SILVE
R AVE
WARD ROAD
CREEK ROAD
INDUSTRIAL
COPP
ER AV
E
RANK
EN AV
E
25TH
ST
20TH ST
17TH ST
CLOSED RD.
27TH
ST
COMO
ST
RIVER ROAD
BEAT
RICE
RD
66TH AVE
65TH AVE
64TH AVE
62ND AVENUE
BARRETT AVE
CYPRESS WAY
25TH STREET
23RD STREET
13TH
STRE
ET
12TH
STRE
ET
11TH STREET
73RD AVE
HUGH
ES RO
AD
DANI
SH RO
AD
24TH
ST
61ST AVE
SPRING CRES
75TH AVENUE
SELKIRK PL.
59TH AVE
GRANBY ROAD
COMO
RO
AD
BIRCH ROAD
72ND AVENUE
WARD
LAKE
RD
REZANSOFF RD
72ND AVE
72ND AVE
VICTORIA WAY
WINNIPEG AVE
66TH AVENUE
65TH AVENUE
VAN NESS WAY
MOUNTAIN PL.
SPRA
GGET
T RD
60TH AVENUE
BRYCEN PLACE
73RD AVE
VINE
STR
EET
PLOT
NIKO
FF RD
KOFTINKOFF RD
19TH ST
19TH ST
HIGHWAY NO 3
2ND STREET
BIRC
H S
TREE
T12TH
ST
REET
PINE V
IEW
CRES
77TH AVE
78TH AVE
67TH AVENUE
68TH AVENUE
HEIGHTS DRIVEHEIGHTS DRIVE
12TH STREET
ALMOND GARDENS
SPRA
GGET
T ROA
D
CENTRAL AVENUE
COOP
ER
ROAD
COMO
ST
REET
KENM
ORE
ROA
D
10TH
ST
REET
66TH AVENUE
23RD STREET22ND STREET
21ST STREET
20TH STREET
19TH STREET 18TH STREET 17TH STREET 16TH STREET
NORT
H FOR
K ROA
D
LONDON ROAD
19TH
ST
REET
18TH
ST
REET
72ND AVENUE
SAND CREEK ROAD
SAND
CRE
EK R
OAD
SAND CREEK
ROAD
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVE
RSID
E DRI
VE
85TH AVENUE
70TH AVENUE
COLUMBIA DRIVE
THIRD ROAD
DONALDSON DRIVE
DONALDSON DRIVE
DONALDSON DRIVE
73RD AVENUE
PERE
VERS
OFF R
OAD
DIVI
SION
ROA
D
8TH STREET
9TH
S
TREE
T
CASCADE BOULEVARD
SIXTH ROAD
76TH AVENUE
CENTRAL AVENUE
COALCHUTE ROAD
18TH
S
TREE
T
17TH
S
TREE
T
SAGAMORE AVENUE
76TH AVENUE
BEVERLEY AVENUE
DARC
Y
RO
AD
21ST STREET
68TH AVENUE
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
82ND AVENUE83RD
AVENUE84TH AVENUE
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
19TH
STRE
ET
McCA
LLUM
VIEW
DRI
VE
McCALLUM VIEW DRIVE
77TH AVE
81ST AVENUE
5TH
STR
EET
78TH AVENUE
80TH A
VENUE
75TH AVENUE
8TH STREET
6TH STREET
5TH STREET
4TH STREET
3RD STREET
2ND STREET
8TH STREET
7TH STREET
6TH STREET
5TH STREET
4TH STREET
3RD STREET
68TH AVENUE
68TH AVENUE
66TH AVENUE
9TH STREET
10TH STREET
27TH STREET
DONALDSON DRIVE
22ND STREET
CORO
NATI
ON
PLA
CE
SAGAMORE AVENUE
BOUN
DARY
DRI
VEBO
UNDA
RY
D
RIVE
75TH
AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
16TH
ST
REET
77TH AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
YALE
MANLY
STREET
AVENUE
GOLDEN
WESTERN CENTRAL
25TH ST
SUNSHINE
SILVE
R AVE
COMO
ST
CREEK ROAD
POPOFF ROAD
13TH STREET
14TH
STRE
ET
65TH AVE
18TH ST
72ND AVENUE
SIXTH ROAD
72ND AVE
HIGHWAY NO 3
JMAYOFF ROAD
GRAN
BY ST
REET
WELLINGTON CR
CENTRAL AVE
LANSDOWNE CRES
11TH STREET
FOURTH ROAD
7TH STREET
CENTRAL AVENUE
COALCHUTE ROAD
KETT
LE RI
VER D
RIVE
79TH AVE
70TH AVENUE
MAPLE STREET
9TH STREET
7TH STREET
2ND STREET
INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
2ND STREET
LAW
RENC
E
STR
EET
10TH STREET
NORT
HFOR
K - F
RANK
LIN R
D
MARKET
AVENUE
81ST AVENUE
6TH STREET
JASPER AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
CENTRAL
AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
SOUTHERN TRANS PROVINCIAL HIGHWAY NO 3
17TH
ST
REET
147-126 May 2009
Existing RoadInfrastructure Network
City of Grand ForksUtilities Capital Plan
Legend
300 3000
1:15,000Scale in Metres
Municipal Boundary
Existing Road
Figure 5-1
O:\01
00-01
99\14
7-126
\430-G
IS\M
XD-R
p\147
126F
ig5-1.
mxd
04/05
/2009
@ 3:
00:46
PM
Project No. Date
K E T T L E R I V E R
K E T T L E R I V E R
G R A N B YR I V E R
ST
ST
WAY
WAY
7TH
6TH
5TH
4TH
3RD
2ND
1ST
AVE
AVE
WAY
WAY
WAY
R/W
R/W
ROAD
ROAD
69TH
68TH
76TH
76TH
FORK
CRES
PARK
ROAD
ROAD
ROADROAD
66TH
65TH
ROAD
ROAD
LANE
CRES
ROAD
ROADROAD
LOGAN
FIFTH
NORTH
BLUFF
FIRST
RIVER DRIVE
RIVER DRIVE
33813
JASPER
AVEN
UE
ANDROS
RANK
ENAV
ENUE
STREETSTREETSTREETSTREETSTREET
STREET
AVENUE
STRE
ET
VALLEY
VALLEY
STREET
SECOND
KONK
EN
AVENUE
AVENUE
KETTLE
KETT
LE
AVENUE
WALNUT
13A S
T
CAMERON
PINE R
D
29TH
ST
13A S
T.
62ND AVE
63RD AVE
REPU
BLIC
G N ROAD
G N
ROAD
72ND AVE
73RD AVE
78TH AVE
71ST AVE
DOWE
DOFF
62ND AVE
60TH AVE
71ST AVE
79th AVE
ALMA AVE
68TH AVE
67TH AVE
MORRISSEY
78TH AVE
ROAD EAST
22ND ST
21ST ST
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
MORRISSEY
LAUREL AVE
SILVE
R AVE
WARD ROAD
CREEK ROAD
INDUSTRIAL
COPP
ER AV
E
RANK
EN AV
E
25TH
ST
20TH ST
17TH ST
CLOSED RD.
27TH
ST
COMO
ST
RIVER ROAD
BEAT
RICE
RD
66TH AVE
65TH AVE
64TH AVE
62ND AVENUE
BARRETT AVE
CYPRESS WAY
25TH STREET
23RD STREET
13TH
STRE
ET
12TH
STRE
ET
11TH STREET
73RD AVE
HUGH
ES RO
AD
DANI
SH RO
AD
24TH
ST
61ST AVE
SPRING CRES
75TH AVENUE
SELKIRK PL.
59TH AVE
GRANBY ROAD
COMO
RO
AD
BIRCH ROAD
72ND AVENUE
WARD
LAKE
RD
REZANSOFF RD
72ND AVE
72ND AVE
VICTORIA WAY
WINNIPEG AVE
66TH AVENUE
65TH AVENUE
VAN NESS WAY
MOUNTAIN PL.
SPRA
GGET
T RD
60TH AVENUE
BRYCEN PLACE
73RD AVE
VINE
STR
EET
PLOT
NIKO
FF RD
KOFTINKOFF RD
19TH ST
19TH ST
HIGHWAY NO 3
2ND STREET
BIRC
H S
TREE
T12TH
ST
REET
PINE V
IEW
CRES
77TH AVE
78TH AVE
67TH AVENUE
68TH AVENUE
HEIGHTS DRIVEHEIGHTS DRIVE
12TH STREET
ALMOND GARDENS
SPRA
GGET
T ROA
D
CENTRAL AVENUE
COOP
ER
ROAD
COMO
ST
REET
KENM
ORE
ROA
D
10TH
ST
REET
66TH AVENUE
23RD STREET22ND STREET
21ST STREET
20TH STREET
19TH STREET 18TH STREET 17TH STREET 16TH STREET
NORT
H FOR
K ROA
D
LONDON ROAD
19TH
ST
REET
18TH
ST
REET
72ND AVENUE
SAND CREEK ROAD
SAND
CRE
EK R
OAD
SAND CREEK
ROAD
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVE
RSID
E DRI
VE
85TH AVENUE
70TH AVENUE
COLUMBIA DRIVE
THIRD ROAD
DONALDSON DRIVE
DONALDSON DRIVE
DONALDSON DRIVE
73RD AVENUE
PERE
VERS
OFF R
OAD
DIVI
SION
ROA
D
8TH STREET
9TH
S
TREE
T
CASCADE BOULEVARD
SIXTH ROAD
76TH AVENUE
CENTRAL AVENUE
COALCHUTE ROAD
18TH
S
TREE
T
17TH
S
TREE
T
SAGAMORE AVENUE
76TH AVENUE
BEVERLEY AVENUE
DARC
Y
RO
AD
21ST STREET
68TH AVENUE
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
82ND AVENUE83RD
AVENUE84TH AVENUE
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
19TH
STRE
ET
McCA
LLUM
VIEW
DRI
VE
McCALLUM VIEW DRIVE
77TH AVE
81ST AVENUE
5TH
STR
EET
78TH AVENUE
80TH A
VENUE
75TH AVENUE
8TH STREET
6TH STREET
5TH STREET
4TH STREET
3RD STREET
2ND STREET
8TH STREET
7TH STREET
6TH STREET
5TH STREET
4TH STREET
3RD STREET
68TH AVENUE
68TH AVENUE
66TH AVENUE
9TH STREET
10TH STREET
27TH STREET
DONALDSON DRIVE
22ND STREET
CORO
NATI
ON
PLA
CE
SAGAMORE AVENUE
BOUN
DARY
DRI
VEBO
UNDA
RY
D
RIVE
75TH
AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
16TH
ST
REET
77TH AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
YALE
MANLY
STREET
AVENUE
GOLDEN
WESTERN CENTRAL
25TH ST
SUNSHINE
SILVE
R AVE
COMO
ST
CREEK ROAD
POPOFF ROAD
13TH STREET
14TH
STRE
ET
65TH AVE
18TH ST
72ND AVENUE
SIXTH ROAD
72ND AVE
HIGHWAY NO 3
JMAYOFF ROAD
GRAN
BY ST
REET
WELLINGTON CR
CENTRAL AVE
LANSDOWNE CRES
11TH STREET
FOURTH ROAD
7TH STREET
CENTRAL AVENUE
COALCHUTE ROAD
KETT
LE RI
VER D
RIVE
79TH AVE
70TH AVENUE
MAPLE STREET
9TH STREET
7TH STREET
2ND STREET
INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
2ND STREET
LAW
RENC
E
STR
EET
10TH STREET
NORT
HFOR
K - F
RANK
LIN R
D
MARKET
AVENUE
81ST AVENUE
6TH STREET
JASPER AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
CENTRAL
AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
SOUTHERN TRANS PROVINCIAL HIGHWAY NO 3
17TH
ST
REET
147-126 May 2009
SidewalkPlan
City of Grand ForksUtilities Capital Plan
Legend
300 3000
1:15,000Scale in Metres
Figure 5-2
Sidewalks
Proposed ConnectorConcrete Walkway
Existing Asphalt WalkwayExisting Concrete WalkwayProposed River WalkwayProposed HighwayAsphalt Walkway
Proposed DowntownConnector ConcreteWalkway
Municipal Boundary
Map D
ocum
ent: (
O:\01
00-01
99\14
7-126
\430-G
IS\MX
D-Rp
\1471
26Fig
5-2.m
xd)
14/05
/2009
-- 4:1
4:46 P
M
Existing River Walkway
Project No. Date
K E T T L E R I V E R
K E T T L E R I V E R
G R A N B YR I V E R
ST
ST
WAY
WAY
7TH
6TH
5TH
4TH
3RD
2ND
1ST
AVE
AVE
WAY
WAY
WAY
R/W
R/W
ROAD
ROAD
69TH
68TH
76TH
76TH
FORK
CRES
PARK
ROAD
ROAD
ROADROAD
66TH
65TH
ROAD
ROAD
LANE
CRES
ROAD
ROADROAD
LOGAN
FIFTH
NORTH
BLUFF
FIRST
RIVER DRIVE
RIVER DRIVE
33813
JASPER
AVEN
UE
ANDROS
RANK
ENAV
ENUE
STREETSTREETSTREETSTREETSTREET
STREET
AVENUE
STRE
ET
VALLEY
VALLEY
STREET
SECOND
KONK
EN
AVENUE
AVENUE
KETTLE
KETT
LE
AVENUE
WALNUT
13A S
T
CAMERON
PINE R
D
29TH
ST
13A S
T.
62ND AVE
63RD AVE
REPU
BLIC
G N ROAD
G N
ROAD
72ND AVE
73RD AVE
78TH AVE
71ST AVE
DOWE
DOFF
62ND AVE
60TH AVE
71ST AVE
79th AVE
ALMA AVE
68TH AVE
67TH AVE
MORRISSEY
78TH AVE
ROAD EAST
22ND ST
21ST ST
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
MORRISSEY
LAUREL AVE
SILVE
R AVE
WARD ROAD
CREEK ROAD
INDUSTRIAL
COPP
ER AV
E
RANK
EN AV
E
25TH
ST
20TH ST
17TH ST
CLOSED RD.
27TH
ST
COMO
ST
RIVER ROAD
BEAT
RICE
RD
66TH AVE
65TH AVE
64TH AVE
62ND AVENUE
BARRETT AVE
CYPRESS WAY
25TH STREET
23RD STREET
13TH
STRE
ET
12TH
STRE
ET
11TH STREET
73RD AVE
HUGH
ES RO
AD
DANI
SH RO
AD
24TH
ST
61ST AVE
SPRING CRES
75TH AVENUE
SELKIRK PL.
59TH AVE
GRANBY ROAD
COMO
RO
AD
BIRCH ROAD
72ND AVENUE
WARD
LAKE
RD
REZANSOFF RD
72ND AVE
72ND AVE
VICTORIA WAY
WINNIPEG AVE
66TH AVENUE
65TH AVENUE
VAN NESS WAY
MOUNTAIN PL.
SPRA
GGET
T RD
60TH AVENUE
BRYCEN PLACE
73RD AVE
VINE
STR
EET
PLOT
NIKO
FF RD
KOFTINKOFF RD
19TH ST
19TH ST
HIGHWAY NO 3
2ND STREET
BIRC
H S
TREE
T12TH
ST
REET
PINE V
IEW
CRES
77TH AVE
78TH AVE
67TH AVENUE
68TH AVENUE
HEIGHTS DRIVEHEIGHTS DRIVE
12TH STREET
ALMOND GARDENS
SPRA
GGET
T ROA
D
CENTRAL AVENUE
COOP
ER
ROAD
COMO
ST
REET
KENM
ORE
ROA
D
10TH
ST
REET
66TH AVENUE
23RD STREET22ND STREET
21ST STREET
20TH STREET
19TH STREET 18TH STREET 17TH STREET 16TH STREET
NORT
H FOR
K ROA
D
LONDON ROAD
19TH
ST
REET
18TH
ST
REET
72ND AVENUE
SAND CREEK ROAD
SAND
CRE
EK R
OAD
SAND CREEK
ROAD
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVE
RSID
E DRI
VE
85TH AVENUE
70TH AVENUE
COLUMBIA DRIVE
THIRD ROAD
DONALDSON DRIVE
DONALDSON DRIVE
DONALDSON DRIVE
73RD AVENUE
PERE
VERS
OFF R
OAD
DIVI
SION
ROA
D
8TH STREET
9TH
S
TREE
T
CASCADE BOULEVARD
SIXTH ROAD
76TH AVENUE
CENTRAL AVENUE
COALCHUTE ROAD
18TH
S
TREE
T
17TH
S
TREE
T
SAGAMORE AVENUE
76TH AVENUE
BEVERLEY AVENUE
DARC
Y
RO
AD
21ST STREET
68TH AVENUE
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
82ND AVENUE83RD
AVENUE84TH AVENUE
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
19TH
STRE
ET
McCA
LLUM
VIEW
DRI
VE
McCALLUM VIEW DRIVE
77TH AVE
81ST AVENUE
5TH
STR
EET
78TH AVENUE
80TH A
VENUE
75TH AVENUE
8TH STREET
6TH STREET
5TH STREET
4TH STREET
3RD STREET
2ND STREET
8TH STREET
7TH STREET
6TH STREET
5TH STREET
4TH STREET
3RD STREET
68TH AVENUE
68TH AVENUE
66TH AVENUE
9TH STREET
10TH STREET
27TH STREET
DONALDSON DRIVE
22ND STREET
CORO
NATI
ON
PLA
CE
SAGAMORE AVENUE
BOUN
DARY
DRI
VEBO
UNDA
RY
D
RIVE
75TH
AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
16TH
ST
REET
77TH AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
YALE
MANLY
STREET
AVENUE
GOLDEN
WESTERN CENTRAL
25TH ST
SUNSHINE
SILVE
R AVE
COMO
ST
CREEK ROAD
POPOFF ROAD
13TH STREET
14TH
STRE
ET
65TH AVE
18TH ST
72ND AVENUE
SIXTH ROAD
72ND AVE
HIGHWAY NO 3
JMAYOFF ROAD
GRAN
BY ST
REET
WELLINGTON CR
CENTRAL AVE
LANSDOWNE CRES
11TH STREET
FOURTH ROAD
7TH STREET
CENTRAL AVENUE
COALCHUTE ROAD
KETT
LE RI
VER D
RIVE
79TH AVE
70TH AVENUE
MAPLE STREET
9TH STREET
7TH STREET
2ND STREET
INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
2ND STREET
LAW
RENC
E
STR
EET
10TH STREET
NORT
HFOR
K - F
RANK
LIN R
D
MARKET
AVENUE
81ST AVENUE
6TH STREET
JASPER AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
CENTRAL
AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
SOUTHERN TRANS PROVINCIAL HIGHWAY NO 3
17TH
ST
REET
147-126 May 2009
Road UpgradePriorities
City of Grand ForksUtilities Capital Plan
Legend
300 3000
1:15,000Scale in Metres
Municipal Boundary
Existing RoadPriority
HighMediumLow
Figure 5-3
O:\01
00-01
99\14
7-126
\430-G
IS\M
XD-R
p\147
126F
ig5-3.
mxd
13/05
/2009
@ 11
:44:09
AM
Section 6 Multi-Utility Upgrading Strategy
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1
MAY 2009
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. 6-1 Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
6. MULTI-UTILITY UPGRADING STRATEGY
6.1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES
It is evident that synergies will exist in some parts of the City where significant work on upgrading underground utility pipes coincide with a need for pavement replacement. It is therefore proposed that a Multi-Utility Upgrading Strategy be adopted in certain locations to complement upgrading initiatives identified for individual utilities. Under this strategy the roads, water and sanitary utilities will each dedicate an annual budget to fund such projects. The following principles have been considered for the purpose of developing an appropriate implementation strategy for multi-utility upgrades: No planned excavation of roads for upgrading of underground utilities within five
years of repaving;
Consider repaving the entire section of road if one or more utilities require upgrade as a high priority;
Consider repaving the entire section of road if two or more utilities require upgrade as medium-priorities; and
Consider repaving the entire road intersection where utilities cross at a road intersection.
6.2 UPGRADE PRIORITIES
In order to develop a comprehensive infrastructure upgrade plan, individual projects for upgrading each infrastructure system were initially assessed independently of adjacent infrastructure and categorized using a three-level priority approach as follows: High priority = 3 Medium priority = 2 Low priority = 1
To investigate the potential for increasing efficiency and reducing costs through an integrated construction approach, all high-priority and medium-priority projects were further analyzed to determine which projects were located in close proximity to each other. Project priority was assigned to each road section based on the combined priority score from each of the road, sanitary, and potable water utilities. The priority multi-utility projects identified with this approach were those that received the highest score using a decision matrix based on the principles summarized in Section 6.1 (i.e. high priority projects were identified as the sections with the highest cumulative score).
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1 MAY 2009
6-2 KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD.
Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
Figure 6-1: provides a graphical representation of the areas within the City that have been classified as high-priority under this approach.
6.3 CAPITAL PROJECTS
Based on this approach, the capital plan provides for an annual budget of $300,000 to fund multi-utility projects. The funding for this programme is based on an annual contribution of $100,000 each from the road, water and sewer utilities. This annual budget is only sufficient to complete portions of the identified multi-utility projects each year, and thus the multi-utility upgrade work is expected to be phased over several years. Proposed projects for this programme are identified on Figure 6-1.
Project No. Date
K E T T L E R I V E R
K E T T L E R I V E R
G R A N B YR I V E R
ST
ST
WAY
WAY
7TH
6TH
5TH
4TH
3RD
2ND
1ST
AVE
AVE
WAY
WAY
WAY
R/W
R/W
ROAD
ROAD
69TH
68TH
76TH
76TH
FORK
CRES
PARK
ROAD
ROAD
ROADROAD
66TH
65TH
ROAD
ROAD
LANE
CRES
ROAD
ROADROAD
LOGAN
FIFTH
NORTH
BLUFF
FIRST
RIVER DRIVE
RIVER DRIVE
33813
JASPERAV
ENUE
ANDROS
RANK
ENAV
ENUE
STREETSTREETSTREETSTREETSTREET
STREET
AVENUE
STRE
ET
VALLEY
VALLEY
STREET
SECOND
KONK
EN
AVENUE
AVENUE
KETTLE
KETT
LE
AVENUE
WALNUT
13A S
T
CAMERON
PINE R
D
29TH
ST
13A S
T.
62ND AVE
63RD AVERE
PUBL
IC
G N ROAD
G N
ROAD
72ND AVE
73RD AVE
78TH AVE
71ST AVE
DOWE
DOFF
62ND AVE
60TH AVE
71ST AVE
79th AVE
ALMA AVE
68TH AVE
67TH AVE
MORRISSEY
78TH AVE
ROAD EAST
22ND ST
21ST ST
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
HIGHWAY 3
MORRISSEY
LAUREL AVE
SILVE
R AVE
WARD ROAD
CREEK ROAD
INDUSTRIAL
COPP
ER AV
E
RANK
EN AV
E
25TH
ST
20TH ST
17TH ST
CLOSED RD.
27TH
ST
COMO
ST
RIVER ROAD
BEAT
RICE
RD
66TH AVE
65TH AVE
64TH AVE
62ND AVENUE
BARRETT AVE
CYPRESS WAY
25TH STREET
23RD STREET
13TH
STRE
ET
12TH
STRE
ET
11TH STREET
73RD AVE
HUGH
ES RO
AD
DANI
SH RO
AD
24TH
ST
61ST AVE
SPRING CRES
75TH AVENUE
SELKIRK PL.
59TH AVE
GRANBY ROAD
COMO
RO
AD
BIRCH ROAD
72ND AVENUE
WARD
LAKE
RD
REZANSOFF RD
72ND AVE
72ND AVE
VICTORIA WAY
WINNIPEG AVE
66TH AVENUE
65TH AVENUE
VAN NESS WAY
MOUNTAIN PL.
SPRA
GGET
T RD
60TH AVENUE
BRYCEN PLACE
73RD AVE
VINE
STR
EET
PLOT
NIKO
FF RD
KOFTINKOFF RD
19TH ST
19TH ST
HIGHWAY NO 3
2ND STREET
BIRC
H S
TREE
T12TH
ST
REET
PINE V
IEW
CRES
77TH AVE
78TH AVE
67TH AVENUE
68TH AVENUE
HEIGHTS DRIVEHEIGHTS DRIVE
12TH STREET
ALMOND GARDENS
SPRA
GGET
T ROA
D
CENTRAL AVENUE
COOP
ER
ROAD
COMO
ST
REET
KENM
ORE
ROA
D
10TH
ST
REET
66TH AVENUE
23RD STREET22ND STREET
21ST STREET
20TH STREET
19TH STREET 18TH STREET 17TH STREET 16TH STREET
NORT
H FOR
K ROA
D
LONDON ROAD
19TH
ST
REET
18TH
ST
REET
72ND AVENUE
SAND CREEK ROAD
SAND
CRE
EK R
OAD
SAND CREEK
ROAD
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIVE
RSID
E DRI
VE
85TH AVENUE
70TH AVENUE
COLUMBIA DRIVE
THIRD ROAD
DONALDSON DRIVE
DONALDSON DRIVE
DONALDSON DRIVE
73RD AVENUE
PERE
VERS
OFF R
OAD
DIVI
SION
ROA
D
8TH STREET
9TH
S
TREE
T
CASCADE BOULEVARD
SIXTH ROAD
76TH AVENUE
CENTRAL AVENUE
COALCHUTE ROAD
18TH
S
TREE
T
17TH
S
TREE
T
SAGAMORE AVENUE
76TH AVENUE
BEVERLEY AVENUE
DARC
Y
RO
AD
21ST STREET
68TH AVENUE
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
82ND AVENUE83RD
AVENUE84TH AVENUE
KETTLE RIVER DRIVE
19TH
STRE
ET
McCA
LLUM
VIEW
DRI
VE
McCALLUM VIEW DRIVE
77TH AVE
81ST AVENUE
5TH
STR
EET
78TH AVENUE
80TH A
VENUE
75TH AVENUE
8TH STREET
6TH STREET
5TH STREET
4TH STREET
3RD STREET
2ND STREET
8TH STREET
7TH STREET
6TH STREET
5TH STREET
4TH STREET
3RD STREET
68TH AVENUE
68TH AVENUE
66TH AVENUE
9TH STREET
10TH STREET
27TH STREET
DONALDSON DRIVE
22ND STREET
CORO
NATI
ON
PLA
CE
SAGAMORE AVENUE
BOUN
DARY
DRI
VEBO
UNDA
RY
D
RIVE
75TH
AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
16TH
ST
REET
77TH AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
YALE
MANLY
STREET
AVENUE
GOLDEN
WESTERN CENTRAL
25TH ST
SUNSHINE
SILVE
R AVE
COMO
ST
CREEK ROAD
POPOFF ROAD
13TH STREET
14TH
STRE
ET
65TH AVE
18TH ST
72ND AVENUE
SIXTH ROAD
72ND AVE
HIGHWAY NO 3
JMAYOFF ROAD
GRAN
BY ST
REET
WELLINGTON CR
CENTRAL AVE
LANSDOWNE CRES
11TH STREET
FOURTH ROAD
7TH STREET
CENTRAL AVENUE
COALCHUTE ROAD
KETT
LE RI
VER D
RIVE
79TH AVE
70TH AVENUE
MAPLE STREET
9TH STREET
7TH STREET
2ND STREET
INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
2ND STREET
LAW
RENC
E
STR
EET
10TH STREET
NORT
HFOR
K - F
RANK
LIN R
D
MARKET
AVENUE
81ST AVENUE
6TH STREET
JASPER AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
75TH
AVENUE
CENTRAL
AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
SOUTHERN TRANS PROVINCIAL HIGHWAY NO 3
17TH
ST
REET
147-126 May 2009
Multi-UtilityUpgrading Priorities
City of Grand ForksUtilities Capital Plan
Legend
300 3000
1:15,000Scale in Metres
Municipal BoundaryUpgrade/Repair PrioritiesVALUE
Cumulative Priority Score = 1-8
Cumulative Priority Score = 9
Figure 6-1
O:\01
00-01
99\14
7-126
\430-G
IS\M
XD-R
p\147
126F
ig6-1.
mxd
13/05
/2009
@ 10
:21:47
AM
Note:Multi-utility upgrade priority determinedbased on computing the cumulative score for priorities for each of the sanitary, potable water, and roads.For each utility, a three-level approach was adopted:High priority = 3Medium priority = 2Low priority = 1The highest priority thus has a cumulative score of 9.
Section 7 Capital Plan
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1
MAY 2009
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. 7-1 Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
7. CAPITAL PLAN
Table 7-1 sets out the proposed capital plan for the individual utilities.
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNINGFINAL REPORT - REV. 1
CITY OF GRAND FORKS MAY 2009
Table 7-1: Capital PlanYear
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
SANITARYCCTV Inspection 100,000 100,000 50,000 - - - - - - -Repair Structural Defects 300,000 500,000 600,000 Park Lift Station Replacement and Related Infrastructure 3,000,000 - - - - - - - - -South Kettle Sewer Upgrade 700,000 - - - - - - - -Upgrade Wastewater Disinfection System - - - - - 420,000 - - - -Upgrade Sludge Management System - - - - - - - - 750,000 -Multi-Utility Upgrading Initiatives 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Miscellaneous Projects and Minor Upgrade Work 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Subtotal 4,300,000 800,000 850,000 200,000 200,000 620,000 200,000 200,000 950,000 200,000
POTABLE WATERGroundwater Contamination Study 41,000 - - - - - - - - -Groundwater Source Well Investigation and Construction 114,000 500,000 500,000 - - - - - - -Upgrade WatermainsPipe Age Greater than 40 Years - Commercial/Institutional Areas 200,000 50,000 - - - - - - - -Pipe Age Greater than 40 Years - Residential Areas 250,000 250,000 300,000 600,000 800,000 800,000 600,000 600,000 400,000 400,000 Pipe Age Between 20 to 40 Years - Commercial/Institutional Areas - - - - - - - - 200,000 200,000 Pipe Age Between 20 to 40 Years - Residential Areas - - - 200,000 - - 200,000 200,000 200,000 400,000 Westside Reservoir 200,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 - - - - - - -Multi-Utility Upgrading Initiatives 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Miscellaneous Projects and Minor Upgrade Work 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Subtotal 1,005,000 3,250,000 3,250,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,200,000
ROADSUpgrade High Priority Roads 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 Upgrade Medium Priority Roads 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 New and Upgraded Sidewalks 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Multi-Utility Upgrading Initiatives 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Miscellaneous Projects and Minor Upgrade Work 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000
Subtotal 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000
STORMWATERPrepare Stormwater Management Plan 60,000 - - - - - - - - -Implementation of Projects Identified by Stormwater Management Plan 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Miscellaneous Projects and Minor Upgrade Work 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Subtotal 160,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET 6,465,000 5,650,000 5,700,000 2,800,000 2,800,000 3,220,000 2,300,000 2,300,000 3,050,000 2,500,000 Note: 36,785,000 1. Construction engineering costs not included in the above projects.
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD.Consulting EngineersO:\0100-0199\147-126\300-Reports\CapitalPlan_Final V2\[Table7-1_20090504_Capital_Plan.xls]Sheet1
Grand total at the end of 10 years:
Projects
Section 8 Conclusions and Recommendations
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1
MAY 2009
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. 8-1 Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
8.1 CONCLUSIONS
1. Based on currently available engineering analysis, a Utilities Capital Plan has been prepared that identifies a recommended upgrading strategy for municipal utilities.
2. While planning for future growth must not be ignored, it appears that the appropriate
focus of any infrastructure capital investment program at this time should be on rehabilitation and upgrading of existing facilities and not expansion of these systems.
3. The plan includes a provision for a Multi-Utility Upgrading Programme where
synergies between the upgrading needs of different utilities have been identified.
4. Each utility should receive an annual budget for addressing unidentified minor works.
5. The road, water and sewer systems all have adequate engineering analysis already completed in order to prepare this plan. However the stormwater utility has received minimal attention and it is appropriate to undertake a Stormwater Management Plan in order to provide the technical foundations required for future investment in this utility.
8.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
1. It is recommended that the City adopt this report as the technical foundation for a long term capital works programme to upgrade existing municipal utility systems. Should availability of funding not match the timeline set out in the plan, projects can be either accelerated or deferred in order to match financial resources.
2. A Stormwater Management Plan should be commissioned as a priority item in order
to identify and assess related technical issues and develop the optimum strategies for resolving these challenges. The results will define future stormwater management capital projects for subsequent incorporation into this capital plan
Section 9 Report Submission
UTILITIES CAPITAL PLANNING FINAL REPORT – REV. 1
MAY 2009
KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. 9-1 Consulting Engineers 147.126
CITY OF GRAND FORKS
9. REPORT SUBMISSION Prepared by: KERR WOOD LEIDAL ASSOCIATES LTD. _______________________________________ Wayne Wong, M.A.Sc., EIT Project Engineer Reviewed by: _______________________________________ Neil McDonald, P.Eng. Senior Project Manager