96
Influence of process on quality And quality control on process

Influence of process on quality

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Influence of process on quality

Influence of process on quality

And quality control on process

Page 2: Influence of process on quality

Why we maintain quality ?

It is need of the customer

Customer is the king .He sees us in quality price ratio

To day mason decides the quality but tomorrow engineerwill decide the quality in our country ( house construction , etc)

What will happen to us ?

Page 3: Influence of process on quality

Customer is the king. He is a better business man than you.Tomorrow’s market is competitive with quality/ price ratio.Customer creates the customers.Bon’t brand the quality alone , brand your service too.

Page 4: Influence of process on quality

Mining

crushing

preblending

Raw meal preparation

Raw meal blending

Pyroprocess

Clinkercooling

Cement grinding

Packing & despatch

Process stepsConcern for Environment

Quality control

Page 5: Influence of process on quality

Process flow diagram and integration of quality

Quality control

Page 6: Influence of process on quality

Variation makes the process and quality to struggle and customeunhappy

customer

Page 7: Influence of process on quality

Mining

Well developed mines

Page 8: Influence of process on quality

Geology and location of boreholes

BoreHolesample

Page 9: Influence of process on quality
Page 10: Influence of process on quality
Page 11: Influence of process on quality

Function of PGNA Analyser

Cf 252

Page 12: Influence of process on quality
Page 13: Influence of process on quality

Variation is a devilIn any process

Page 14: Influence of process on quality
Page 15: Influence of process on quality
Page 16: Influence of process on quality

Lime saturation factor on clinker basis

If MgO is below 2 %

LSF = 100( CaO – free CaO+0.75 MgO)(2.85 SiO2) + ( 1.18 Al2O3) +(0.65 Fe2O3)

If MgO is above 2 %

LSF = 100( CaO – free CaO+1.5 MgO)(2.85 SiO2) + ( 1.18 Al2O3) +(0.65 Fe2O3)

95 – harder to burn, tendency to high free lime & C3S clinker, high early strength high fuel consumption

< 95 , easy to burn , excess coating , excess liquid phase ,possible brick infiltration reduced cement strength , low free limeacceptable standard deviation = 1.2

Page 17: Influence of process on quality
Page 18: Influence of process on quality
Page 19: Influence of process on quality

Raw meal residue Depends upon theMineralogy , ieCalcite or quartz90 mic = 8 – 15 %212 mic = 0.5 – 3 %

Page 20: Influence of process on quality
Page 21: Influence of process on quality

time

Variation frommines

Variation Afterpre blending

Variation afterRaw milling

Variation in quality control

Set point

Page 22: Influence of process on quality
Page 23: Influence of process on quality
Page 24: Influence of process on quality
Page 25: Influence of process on quality
Page 26: Influence of process on quality

Auto sampler position

- 20 mm

Page 27: Influence of process on quality
Page 28: Influence of process on quality
Page 29: Influence of process on quality
Page 30: Influence of process on quality

Liter weight

Page 31: Influence of process on quality
Page 32: Influence of process on quality
Page 33: Influence of process on quality
Page 34: Influence of process on quality
Page 35: Influence of process on quality
Page 36: Influence of process on quality

. Rapid burning ( short burning zone ) and rapid cooling of clinkerimproves the clinker quality. smaller C3S crystals withmicro cracks)

Page 37: Influence of process on quality

Slow burningFast burning

Page 38: Influence of process on quality
Page 39: Influence of process on quality

C3S

Clinker when it is quenched in cooler it creates micro cracks whichneeds less energy for comminution during grinding.

C3S

Clinker cooling

C2S

Page 40: Influence of process on quality

Reactions during clinker cooling

Resorption of alite

Liquid phase + C3S � C2S + C3A + C2(A,F)

Decomposition of alitevery slow coolingreducing conditionsC3S � C2S + CaOCrystallization of liquid phase

Slow cooling: large crystals – improved reactivityMgO crystals grow oncooling (periclase)

Page 41: Influence of process on quality
Page 42: Influence of process on quality
Page 43: Influence of process on quality
Page 44: Influence of process on quality
Page 45: Influence of process on quality
Page 46: Influence of process on quality
Page 47: Influence of process on quality
Page 48: Influence of process on quality
Page 49: Influence of process on quality
Page 50: Influence of process on quality
Page 51: Influence of process on quality
Page 52: Influence of process on quality
Page 53: Influence of process on quality
Page 54: Influence of process on quality
Page 55: Influence of process on quality
Page 56: Influence of process on quality

Properties of cement

Page 57: Influence of process on quality
Page 58: Influence of process on quality

• Portland cement

• Portland pozzolana cement

• Portland slag cement

• Sulfate resistant cement

• Oil well cement

• Rapid hardening cement

• White cement

Page 59: Influence of process on quality

Cement quality tests

• Setting time

• Compressive strength (mortar)

• Modulus of rupture ( bending strength)

• Fineness( blaine or Particle size distribution)

• Expansion ( Le Chatelier & Auto clave)( soundness)

• Chemical analysis

Page 60: Influence of process on quality

X-4.0(100-X) /100 < 35%

3.03.03.0Insoluble residue % (max)

0.8 -1.02

0.8 -1.02

0.66 -1.02

LSF CaO- 0.7 SO3/(2.8S+1.2A+0.65F)

PPC53S53 Gr43 Grspecifications

5.04.04.05.0LOI

3.03.03.03.0SO3 % max

6.05.06.06.0Magnesia ,MgO %,max

0.050.100.10Cl max

> 45C3S

10.0----C3A max

BIS specifications for various grades of cement

Page 61: Influence of process on quality

1051010.0Soundness ,LeChat expansion , (mm) max

30/60060/60030/60030/600Setting time, initial ( min) / final (max) , minutes

300.0370.0225.0225.0Fineness sqm /kg , min

162727233 days+/_ 1 hr

Compressive strength, Mpa , min

0.80.80.80.8Soundness, Autoclave %

0.15Drying shrinkage

3353534328 days +/ - 4 hrs

2237.533337 Days +/_ 2 hrs

Page 62: Influence of process on quality

Blaine apparatus airpermeability test

Page 63: Influence of process on quality
Page 64: Influence of process on quality
Page 65: Influence of process on quality
Page 66: Influence of process on quality

(Part - 5) Determination of Initial and Final Setting Times4031 (Part-5)

Early stiffening – false set or flash set

If less gypsum no gypsum flash set occursIf cement temperature > 130 deg c gypsum dehydrates and flash set occurs

Page 67: Influence of process on quality

Setting time ASTM specification

Page 68: Influence of process on quality

In concrete chemistry ettringite is a hexacalcium aluminate trisulfate hydrate, of general formula: (CaO)6(Al2O3)(SO3)3·32H2O or; CaO)3(Al2O3)(CaSO4)3·32H2O

Page 69: Influence of process on quality

Influencing parameters onCement strength

Page 70: Influence of process on quality

1 3 7 28 90 days

Strength MPa

C3S

C2S

C3A

C4AF60

0

20

30

40

50

Page 71: Influence of process on quality

= f (C3S)

28

7

3

1

MPa 70

60

50

40

30

20

10

40 45 50 55 60 65 % C3S

Page 72: Influence of process on quality

= f (Wk)

28

7

3

1

0

MPa 70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0 0.5 1.0 % Wk

A 1% increase in LOIresult in decrease instrength

1 day by 25 %2 8days by 3 % and90 days by 2 %

Page 73: Influence of process on quality

Cement strength is measured in 1 day, 3 days ,7days and 28 days

Measurement compressive strength BIS 4031 (Part-8)1988(Part - 8)Determination of Compressive strength of hydraulic Cement

Page 74: Influence of process on quality
Page 75: Influence of process on quality

Compression testing

50*50mm

Page 76: Influence of process on quality

Compressive strength – influencing parameters

Compressive strength

1 d 3 d 7 d 28 d

Influencing Normal range 5 – 15 20 – 35 30 - 45 45 - 60Parameters OPC

C3S 45 – 65 % + + + +

C3A 6 – 12 % + + + +

Ks 0.2 – 1.5 % + + +/0/- -

SO3 2 – 4 % +/0/- +/0/- +/0/- +/0/-

Blaine 280 – 300 + + + +m2/kg

Wk 0 - 0.3% - - - -

Page 77: Influence of process on quality

Quantitative rules of thumb

C3S : 1 – 28 d : + 0.5 Mpa / %

Ks ; 1 d : + 4 Mpa / % : 3 d : + 4 Mpa / %: 7 d : - 2 Mpa / %: 28 d : - 10 Mpa / %

(SO3) tot : 1 - 28 d : - 5 Mpa / % from optimum

Blaine : 1 d : + 0.04 Mpa / (m2/ kg) 3- 28 d : + 0.08 Mpa / (m2/ kg)

Page 78: Influence of process on quality

One day strength is contributed mainly byC3A , Soluble alkalies, and C3S

3 day is contributed mainly by C3S

7 days strength is contributed by mainlyC3S

28 days strength is mainly contributed byC2S

Apart from the above cement strength is enhanced byhigher fineness of cement Less C3S crystal size achieved by rapid burningand quenching the clinker in coolerHigher fineness of rawmeal also reduces the crystal size of clinker minerals , ie ., C3S & C2S whichenhances the hydraulic reactivity

Cement strength – influencing parameters

Page 79: Influence of process on quality

Wk , prehydration of clinker

Prehydration of clinker minerals can occur

1. As a result of incorrect internal water cooling in cement mill

2. when storing too hot cement in a silo

3. When clinker and especially cement is exposed to humidity

Please note:If clinker has more soluble alkalis and sulfates it is highly hygroscopic especially when pet coke is fired. In cement silos they form Syngenite , K2SO4.2 CaSO4. H2O which forms lumps and block the cement silos. Hence venting is mustto evacuate moisture and silo cleaning.cements having soluble alkalis and sulfates preferably packed inpaper bags to avoid depletion of strength.

Page 80: Influence of process on quality

Thumb rule formulae for prediction of strength

FLS predicted the formula for cement ground to 300 kgs/ m2

With 4 % gypsum

strength,

d28 = 52 - 10.( Ks) + 0.15.(C3S)

The content of soluble alkalis Ks is dependent on the total alkalicontent and SO3 content in clinker.

As per Knofel it is

F 28 = (3*C3S)+ (2*C2S) + C3A – C4AF N / mm2

Strength prediction

for 3 d = 97 + 35.8 Ma + 38.1K2SO4 + 28.7 Ms – 1.3 C3S Kg/ cm2

7 d = 300 + 13.4 Ms + 2.8 C2S + 56.1 Ma – 15.4 K2SO4 + 15.5 Na2O 28 d = 490 – 55.3 K2SO4 + 1.3 C3S (or)

= 490 – 86 K2O + 2 C3S – 26 Na2O

Page 81: Influence of process on quality

Influence of fineness on cement strength

For cements with the same specific surface the increase of the uniformity factor results in increase of strength of all ages.

1. The specific surface , the percentage of fractions 3- 32 mm and theuniformity factor n really influences the development of cement strength.The influence of 3 - 32 mm fraction and the uniformity factor is higher incement with higher in specific surface ( > 3400 cm2/ g)

2. The fractions with particle size less than 3 mm contributes only to earlystrength while the fraction with particle size more than 24 mm influencesstrength development significantly.

3. While the fractions 3 – 16 mm and 16 – 32 mm seems to be more significant factor for specific surface 3500 – 4000 cm2/ g) . This is relevant only if the granulometric distribution is continuous and steep.

4. The optimistic granulometric distribution of a cement is a continuousand steep ( with high uniformity factor) distribution with a high (65 %)content in 3 – 32 mm fraction and specifically in 16 - 24 mm fraction andlow content of fine particles ( < 3 mm , 10 % ) and specific surface of2500 – 3000 cm2/ g according to Blaine.( high efficiency separator andgrinding media distribution plays significantly here)

Page 82: Influence of process on quality

Properties of cement minerals

Characteristics C3S C2S C3A C4AF

Setting quick slow rapid nil

Hydration rapid slow rapid nil 3 days heat 1.1 cal / g 0.4 cal / g 2 cal / g nil liberation Early strength high upto low upto not much nilContribution 14 days 14 days beyond one day

Late strength less later high later nil nil contribution

Resistance to moderate high poor highChemical attack

Drying shrinkage nil low nil nil

Page 83: Influence of process on quality

Measurement of expansion for free lime ( IS 4031 Part3 -1988

Expansion due to free CaO=< 10 mm

Page 84: Influence of process on quality

Auto clave test forexpansion of cement

(Part - 3) Determination of Soundness

1988

4031 (Part-3)

25*25*282mm

Expansion limit < 0.8mm

Page 85: Influence of process on quality

Autoclave

Calorie meter

Page 86: Influence of process on quality
Page 87: Influence of process on quality

Tube samplers for bulk cement

Page 88: Influence of process on quality

MgO Crystals Or Periclase

Page 89: Influence of process on quality
Page 90: Influence of process on quality

Free lime clusters

Page 91: Influence of process on quality
Page 92: Influence of process on quality

Problems and solutions

1. Grinding problemsa) False set lower cement mill temperature

add less gypsumadd part anhydrite

b) reduced strength high mill temperatureless water cooling correct water cooling

2. Silo storagea) False set short storage time

cooling of cement < 70 deg c

b) reduced strength increase gypsum dehydration inmill

c) lump formation and add less gypsum, use partlysilo blockage (syngenite anhydrate , decrease K2O contentformation, K2SO4.2CaSO4.H2O to avoid the formation of Syngenite

Problems solutions

Page 93: Influence of process on quality

3 ) Bag storage

a. reduced strength short storage time

b. lump formation add TEA during grinding(tri ethanal amine)add hydrophobic agents

c. crust formation plastic coated bags

d. abnormal setting plastic covering pallets

Page 94: Influence of process on quality

qualityProcess

Quality is a set point and process is variable

Right

Page 95: Influence of process on quality

Processquality

Process is a set point and quality is variable

wrong

Page 96: Influence of process on quality

Thanks you for your kind attention And spending your valuable business hours

K.P.PRADEEP KUMARSr.GM OperationKarikkali worksChettinad Cements Ltd