View
9.785
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
FAO's Assistant DG Sustainability Alexander Muller presentation at World Agriculture Watch WAW session of IFAD Farmers' Forum 2012
Citation preview
1
Understandingstructural changes in agriculture,
informing policy dialogue
Farmers’ Forum 23. Feb. 2012
IFAD Alexander Müller, FAO
World Agriculture Watch
WAW at Farmers’ Forum – 23rd February 2012
2
• Why WAW?
• Inform about WAW and other initiatives involving Farmers’ organizations
• How WAW could better serve farmers, agricultural policy makers?
Objectives of the side event
WAW at Farmers’ Forum – 23rd February 2012
3
16:30 Presentation of WAW• A. Müller, FAO• P. Caron, CIRAD
17:00 Panel presentations of ongoing initiatives involving Farmers’ organizations
• ROPPA• AFA• COPROFAM• C. Seré, IFAD
17:40 Open Discussions 18:20 Synthesis and conclusion
Organization
WAW at Farmers’ Forum – 23rd February 2012
4
• Wide diversity of agricultural systems with predominance of small holders and family farms
• Long-term ‘structural’ changes visible at farm level: size of holding, labor and inputs use, market and investment access, investment , non agricultural income etc.
• Differing implications - local to global:• Food & nutrition security; • Economic growth; Employment; cultural changes and
Heritage values• Natural resources (Land and water, BioDiversity, GHG)• Resilience to changes (CC adaptation, ..)
AG transformations: The Context
– 23rd February 2012
5
Agricultural transformation is a GLOBAL phenomenonwith local consequences
social, economic and environmental
World Agriculture Watch – December 2011
6El Oued, ALGERIA
‘Ghout’ system• Small, 0.5ha basins, dug to GWL• Low maintenance, • Adapted to desertification• Family production – subsistence• Preserves agro-biodiversity
‘Modern’ practice• Irrigation• Large fields• Commercial oriented
production
Agricultural Transformation
Implications?• Incomes
• Water availability• Customary rights &
management• etc
7El Oued, ALGERIA
‘Ghout’ system• Small, 0.5ha basins, dug to GWL• Low maintenance, • Adapted to desertification• Family production – subsistence• Preserves agro-biodiversity
‘Modern’ practice• Irrigation• Large fields• Commercial oriented production
Implications?World Agriculture Watch – December 2011
Agricultural Transformation
8World Agriculture Watch – December 2011
Agricultural Transformation
Thika, KENYA
Agribusiness production• Higher input levels• Larger fields• Commercial oriented
production
Family farming• Lower input levels• Smaller fields• Some commercial production
Implications?• Employment• Environment
• Food security & nutrition• etc
FRANCE
Agricultural TransformationDecreasing number of farms, especially small farms
Implications?• Employment• Environment
• Territorial development
• etc
9World Agriculture Watch – December 2011
Why we need to know more about Agricultural Transformations
10WAW at Farmers’ Forum – 23rd February 2012
Why we need to know more about Agricultural Transformations
11
1. Important implications for development goals – local to global
• Food security - MDG1, WFS including poverty and employment
• Environmental integrity – MDG7
WAW at Farmers’ Forum – 23rd February 2012
Why we need to know more about Agricultural Transformations
12
1. Important implications for development goals – local to global
• Food security - MDG1, WFS including poverty and employment
• Environmental integrity – MDG7
2. Polarized policy debates but complex and context-specific situations
WAW at Farmers’ Forum – 23rd February 2012
Why we need to know more about Agricultural Transformations
13
1. Important implications for development goals – local to global
• Food security - MDG1, WFS including poverty and employment
• Environmental integrity – MDG7
2. Polarized policy debates but complex and context-specific situations
3. Insufficient knowledge and capacities of stakeholders to Inform policy dialogue
WAW at Farmers’ Forum – 23rd February 2012
14
1. To understand the diversity of agricultural systems, structural changes and assess socio-economic and environmental implications
2. To improve multi-stakeholder planning and policy formulation related to agricultural transformation at local and international levels
Objectives of WAW
WAW at Farmers’ Forum – 23rd February 2012
WAW Outputs: International
15
1. A common framework to be used (after adaptation to local needs) by local observation units and partners to assess transformations through performances and evolutions of types of “farms”:• Livelihoods Approach ; Socio-economic and environmental indicators; • Scale: Production units to district level, markets, food systems• People centered; gender-sensitive; Local knowledge
2. Identify and characterize “hot spots” of transformations• Could include areas under large scale investments and systems at risks
3. World wide information platform• Information exchange; • Building common knowledge, • Comparative analyses
WAW at Farmers’ Forum – 23rd February 2012
WAW Outputs at National level with a few supported “Local WAW”
16
1. Strengthen Coordination • Build on existing institutions and information networks
2. Capacity development to support policy dialogue on transformations and their implications
3. Improved access to information products for different stakeholder needs:• Assessment reports• Policy options• Forecasts of possible crises • etc.
WAW at Farmers’ Forum – 23rd February 2012
WAW: Key features1. Focus on diversity & structural changes in
agriculture for small to large scale systems, from farm to markets
2. Local observations
3. A common framework with socio-eco and environmental dimensions
4. Innovative inclusive approach, improving stakeholders’capacity including Farmers, to influence policy and planning processes linked to transformations
17WAW at Farmers’ Forum – 23rd February 2012
WAW and Farmers’ organizationsContext
• Important role of farmers’ organizations to improve policy effectiveness, notably to voice specific concerns and interests
• Calls of FO to better understand and recognize specific concerns of family agriculture International Year of Family Farming
• New forms of collaboration involving Farmers’ organizations needed to generate knowledge to inform policy
18
WAW and Farmers’organizationsPossible roles of FO
• Multistakeholders’ involvement at different levels: – Governance: influence what to observe and which
indicators– Use of Farmers’ knowledge– Participation in the collective analysis and multi-
stakeholders dialogue to elaborate policy options – Synergies with existing observation systems led by
Farmers’ organizations
19WAW at Farmers’ Forum – 23rd February 2012
WAW and Farmers’organizationsBenefits expected
• Strengthened capacity to contribute to policy making process through:• Better awareness of performances of types of farms,
agricultural transformations, their impacts and possible policy options
• Reinforced capacities to generate knowledge on agricultural transformations (Training, tools and peer-to-peer exchanges)
• Participation to a forum for dialogue with different stakeholders on agricultural transformations
20WAW at Farmers’ Forum – 23rd February 2012
21
Next steps1.Follow-up action needed by participants --
e.g. interest/commitments etc.
2.Stakeholders and experts meeting in March/ April 2012
• To refine the scope and method
• Consolidate governance and alliance
3.Selected pilot assessments in different regions of the world
WAW at Farmers’ Forum – 23rd February 2012
22
THANK YOU
World Agriculture Watch
World Agriculture Watch – 25 November 2011