Upload
nasapmc
View
36
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
PRT 114 03 January 2012
Architecture for Cost Analytics Process Environment
Architecture for Cost Analytics Process Environment
1 of 42
Los Angeles Washington, D.C. Boston Chantilly Huntsville Dayton Santa Barbara
Albuquerque Colorado Springs Goddard Space Flight Center Johnson Space Center Ogden Patuxent River Washington Navy Yard
Ft. Meade Ft. Monmouth Dahlgren Quantico Cleveland Montgomery Silver Spring San Diego Tampa Tacoma
Aberdeen Oklahoma City Eglin AFB San Antonio New Orleans Denver Vandenberg AFB
Tony Harvey
Daren ElliottNASA 2012 PM Challenge
February 22, 2012
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 2 of 42
Project Lifecycle Process Context
Cost Analytics Framework Overview
Fundamental Cost Data Data Iteration Cost Analytics Tools for Cost Analytics Cost Analytics in the
Project Lifecycle
Outline/Agenda
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 3 of 42
High-level Project Lifecycle Definition Phase (Pre-Phase A)
Simple Definition of Functionality with Value Proposition (High Level Cost and Schedule )
Acquisition Phase (Phase A) Detailed Definition with Cost and Schedule through End-of-Life
Development Phase (Phases B to D) Cost and Schedule updates
Operation Phase (Phase E) Cost and Schedule Updates
Use Cost Analytics in Each Phase
Project Lifecycle Process Overview
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 4 of 42
Definition Phase Acquisition Phase Development Phase Operations Phase
ConceptDefinition
MeasurementCriteria
ProjectDefinition
ManagementDecisions
Cost / ScheduleCalibration
FeasibilityAnalysis
PerformanceAnalysis
ProjectImplementation
ManagementDecisions
ProjectModification/Sustaining
PerformanceAnalysis
Project Analytics Data Store
AnalysisTools
ReportingTools
ProjectDatabase
ProjectManagement
Database
Project Life Cycle Conceptual View
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 5 of 42
Infrastructure Goals
Functionality Provide Cost and Schedule Data Management Provide Cost and Schedule Analysis Tools Provide Project Engineering support for Performance analyses Provide Program Management support for Schedule and Budget
excursion analyses
Maintainability Support Easy Database Changes Support Easy Tool Additions Support Data Load/Unload
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 6 of 42
Infrastructure Options
Infrastructure Options for Technology Solution Use a Web UI and MS/SQLServer
Hosted on Network Servers Accessible to Authorized Users in NDC domain
Use Desktop Application and Apache Derby Database Installed and Executed on a PC/Laptop Restricted to PC Users Uses Network Drives for inter-User communications
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 7 of 42
Users
IP Network / JSC VPN
MOPCost Analysis Data
Authenticated Database
Network Servers
(1) Prepare Cost Data XLS File(s)
(3) File Uploaded into
DB
(2) Log into Infrastructure
to upload
Web Infrastructure
(4) Create Reports
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 8 of 42
Network DriveTransfer/Reporting Medium
Embedded Database
(1) Prepare Cost Data XLS File(s)
(2) File Uploaded into
DB
Desktop Infrastructure
UserCost Analysis Data
(3) Export Cost Data and Reports
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 9 of 42
Fundamental Cost Data
QUESTION: What do you get when you… ? Identify EVERY Cost Driver and capture them in an Excel Spreadsheet Identify the Schedule Tasks associated with each Cost Item Separate different Cost Data Types into separate Tabs
E.g. Material, Travel, Level of Effort, Software Development scope
ANSWER: Something like…
CxP MOP Cost Analysis Data Requirements (CADRe) CADRe data is a NASA HQ requirement to demonstrate “credible
cost estimates”
MOP delivered CADRe data to HQ up to MOP PDR
A Normalized data format was used for the MOP CADRe data suitable for storage in a relational database
Tecolote developed a CADRe database on an MOD network server
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 10 of 42
Changing to Schedule Oriented Cost data
MOP CADRe data was Cost Data allocated to Fiscal Years
When the Schedule changed the Cost data needed to bechanged to re-spread it across Fiscal Years to reflect the Schedule changes
Recently the CADRe data has been redesigned to become Schedule Oriented Cost Items are associated with Schedule Tasks Changes to the Project Schedule automatically re-spread the cost
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 11 of 42
CADRe data
What data is supported? Schedule Data
MS/Project files can be used to supply schedule data All costs are associated with a Schedule Task
Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Data CADRe data can use ANY Project defined WBS All costs are associated with a WBS Item
Travel Cost Data Material Cost Data Level of Effort Cost Data Software Development Cost Data
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 12 of 42
Schedule Data
Subject Matter Expert
Schedule Task Name Start End Duration Predecessors % Complete Status DateLow
MultiplierLikeliest Multiplier
High Multiplier
MSProj11 10/3/2011 9/30/2020 2347 10% 15Jun2012 0.9 1 1.2Kickoff 10/3/2011 10/3/2011 0 100% 15Jun2012 1 1 1APA Development 10/3/2011 4/26/2013 410 62% 15Jun2012 0.9 1 1.2APA Design 10/3/2011 10/21/2011 15 1 100% 15Jun2012 0.9 1 1.2APA PBR 10/21/2011 10/21/2011 0 3 100% 15Jun2012 1 1 1APA Implementation 10/24/2011 3/29/2013 375 63% 15Jun2012 0.9 1 1.2APA User Interface 10/24/2011 3/29/2013 375 4 50% 15Jun2012 0.9 1 1.2APA Constraints Checker 10/24/2011 11/2/2012 270 4 70% 15Jun2012 0.9 1 1.2APA Database Manager 10/24/2011 11/9/2012 275 4 60% 15Jun2012 0.9 1 1.2APA Schedule Manager 10/24/2011 8/24/2012 220 4 80% 15Jun2012 0.9 1 1.2
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors% Complete
1 Kickoff 0 days 10/3/11 10/3/11 100%
2 APA Development 410 days 10/3/11 4/26/13 62%
3 APA Design 15 days 10/3/11 10/21/11 1 100%
4 APA PBR 0 days 10/21/11 10/21/11 3 100%
5 APA Implementation 375 days 10/24/11 3/29/13 63%
6 APA User Interface 375 days 10/24/11 3/29/13 4 50%
7 APA Constraints Checker 270 days 10/24/11 11/2/12 4 70%
8 APA Database Manager 275 days 10/24/11 11/9/12 4 60%
9 APA Schedule Manager 220 days 10/24/11 8/24/12 4 80%
10/3
10/21
Qtr 4 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 32011 2012 2013 2014
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 13 of 42
WBS Data
WBS # WBS Name
1. Another Planning Application1.1 APA Management1.2 APA Development1.2.1 APA Systems Engineering1.2.2 APA Implementation1.2.2.1 APA User Interface1.2.2.2 APA Constraints Checker1.2.2.3 APA Database Manager1.2.2.4 APA Schedule Manager1.2.3 APA Deployment1.3 APA Sustaining1.4 APA Modifications
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 14 of 42
Single Config
QtyNum
Configs
Unit Spares
Qty Assoc. TaskCost
DistributionLow
MultiplierLikeliest Multiplier
High Multiplier FY11 FY12
1 1 - APA Development Start 0.90 1 1.2 $0 $5,253
Material Cost Data
WBS # WBS NameActivity
TypeMaterial
Type Material Description BOEPurchase
TypeUnit Price
$FY of price
1. Another Planning Application Dev COTS HW Development Server BOM #3 Buy $5,000 10
Schedule Task Name Start End Duration
MSProj11 10/3/2011 9/30/2020 2347Kickoff 10/3/2011 10/3/2011 0APA Development 10/3/2011 4/26/2013 410
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 15 of 42
Travel Cost Data
BY of price Assoc. Task
Cost Distribution
Low Multiplier
Likeliest Multiplier
High Multiplier FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14
10 APA Development Level 1 1.1 1.2 $0 $9,855 $5,783 $0
Schedule Task Name Start End Duration
MSProj11 10/3/2011 9/30/2020 2347Kickoff 10/3/2011 10/3/2011 0APA Development 10/3/2011 4/26/2013 410
WBS # WBS NameActivity
TypeNum
PeopleNum Trips
Num Days /Trip
Per Diem
Daily Lodging
Cost
Trip Travel Cost
BY of price
Total Cost (BY)
1. Another Planning Application Dev 2 4 3 $75 $150 $1,000 10 $13,400
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 16 of 42
Level of Effort (LOE) Data
WBS # WBS Name Cost TypeActivity
Type Assoc. TaskLevel of
Effort FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
1.1 APA Management FTE Dev APA Development 0.5 - 0.50 0.29 - - 1.2.1 APA Systems Engineering EP Dev APA Design 4.0 - 0.20 - - - 1.2.3 APA Deployment EP Dev APA Deployment 4.0 - - 0.28 - - 1.3 APA Sustaining EP Sus APA Sustaining 2.0 - - 1.02 2.00 2.00 1.4 APA Modifications EP Mod APA Modification - - - - - -
Schedule Task Name Start End Duration
APA Development 10/3/2011 4/26/2013 410APA Design 10/3/2011 10/21/2011 15APA Deployment 4/1/2013 4/26/2013 20APA Sustaining 3/29/2013 9/30/2020 1957
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 17 of 42
(SEER) Software Data
WBS # WBS NameCost Type
Activity Type
Size Units
Newly Developed
Size Pre-exists
% change to Pre-exist
1.2.2.1 APA User Interface EP Dev KSLOC 70 - 0%1.2.2.2 APA Constraints Checker EP Dev KSLOC - 81 10%1.2.2.3 APA Database Manager EP Dev KSLOC - 50 10%1.2.2.4 APA Schedule Manager EP Dev KSLOC - 90 10%
Size Reuse
% change to Reuse
COTS Type - Size
# Separate Programs
Software Phase At Estimate Language Application Type
- 0% None 2 Proposal Java Graphical User Interface- 0% None 2 Proposal Java Expert System- 0% None 2 Proposal Java Data Warehousing- 0% None 2 Proposal Java Data Warehousing
Development Method
Development Standard
ROM Size / Staff Year
Staff Years
Assoc. Task for Phase1 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14
Incremental DO-178B Level C 4.0 8.75 APA User Interface - 5.74 3.01 - RUP Full DO-178B Level C 4.0 3.43 APA Constraints Checker - 3.12 0.30 -
Spiral DO-178B Level C 4.0 1.83 APA Database Manager - 1.64 0.19 - Spiral DO-178B Level C 4.0 3.70 APA Schedule Manager - 3.70 - -
Schedule Task Name Start End Duration
APA User Interface 10/24/2011 3/29/2013 375APA Constraints Checker 10/24/2011 11/2/2012 270APA Database Manager 10/24/2011 11/9/2012 275APA Schedule Manager 10/24/2011 8/24/2012 220
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 18 of 42
Data Iteration
Cost Estimation Events are used to record Multiple Data Snapshots in the Database MCR, SDR, PDR, CDR, etc. Quarterly Baseline Reviews Monthly Status Reports Weekly Project Reviews
Multiple data snapshots provide more opportunities for Cost Analysis Performance analyses from comparing two snapshots
Schedule Performance Analyses Cost Performance Analyses
Trending analyses Changes in scope over time Changes in Cost Estimate over time Changes in Schedule over time
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 19 of 42
Requirements + Design
Budget
Cost Loaded Schedule
I D Task Nam e
41 SRR42 Design, Fab. Dev. Test …43 CDR44 Dev. Q ual. Unit Fab.45 Dev. Q ual. Test and Modif icat ion46 Q ual . Test Faci l i ty (SSC B2) Avai l abl e47 DCR48 Flight Unit 1-4 Prod.49 Flight Unit 2-4 Prod.50 Flight Unit 3-4 Prod.51 Flight Unit 4 Prod.
4/ 1
10/ 9
9/ 15
11/ 30
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
A plan to do the work
Work to be done (i.e. estimated labor + material cost)
Effort
Technology
Resources
Productivity Metrics
06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Cost ProfilesCost
analytics
Basic Cost Analytics
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 20 of 42
ProjectCompletion Date
Budget
ExternalEvents
Total Project Cost(w/ LOE)
I D Task Nam e
41 SRR42 Design, Fab. Dev. Test …43 CDR44 Dev. Q ual. Unit Fab.45 Dev. Q ual. Test and Modif icat ion46 Q ual . Test Faci l i ty (SSC B2) Avai l abl e47 DCR48 Flight Unit 1-4 Prod.49 Flight Unit 2-4 Prod.50 Flight Unit 3-4 Prod.51 Flight Unit 4 Prod.
4/ 1
10/ 9
9/ 15
11/ 30
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
= Source of Uncertainty
Work to be done (i.e. estimated labor + material cost)
Effort
Technology
Resources
Capacity to do work
Utilization
Productivity Metrics
06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
$
p
Emperical Heuristics
Project Risks
Cost Loaded Schedule
A plan to do the work
Cost ProfilesCost
analytics
Extended Cost Analytics
Requirements + Design
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 21 of 42
Tools for Cost Analytics
SEER-SEM for Software Estimation
ACEIT for Cost Estimation
ACEIT for Cost and Schedule Confidence Level Analyses
Schedule Comparison for Schedule Performance Analyses
Cost Profile Comparison for Cost Performance Analysis
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 22 of 42
Cost Analytics in the Project Lifecycle
Definition Phase (Pre-Phase A) Project Business Case Justification
Acquisition Phase (Phase A) Detailed Budget Analyses
Development Phase (Phases B to D) Development Cost and Schedule Performance Analyses
Operation Phase (Phase E) Operations Cost and Schedule Performance Analyses
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 23 of 42
Phases A to EPre-Phase A
Process/ Data Flow Architecture
Project Business Case
Project Scorecard + Detailed Cost / Schedule Data
Planning Data Updates
Updated Cost / Schedule Data
Data Mined from Development
Process
Budget Data
Heuristic Data / Metrics
Project Analytics Database
Project Dashboard
Multi-Project
Dashboard
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 24 of 42
Data Collection - Project Definition
Primary Focus is the “Business Case” Use Business Case Surveys Use Business Case Scorecard Use CADRe Detailed Cost Data Collect Risk (Threat) Data Collect “Replaceable” Costs
Costs that will occur if Project is NOT performed Costs that will be replaced if Project IS performed
Create Business Case Summary from input data Summarize detailed cost/schedule data Derive ROI data
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 25 of 42
Business Case Data
Status items created include Project Scorecard Cost Profile Savings (ROI) profile Project Schedule/ Milestone Chart
Quantitative Cost Savings $381,000
Category Rating ScoreReuse >80% 27Extensibility Med 9
ReusabilityMultiple Groups 9
Flexibility Significant 15Standards Compliant 27Ops Need Mandatory 45
Ops ScopeMultiple Groups 9
$ Avoidance Med 15
Accessibility Some 12Security Low 18TouchPoints Med 6
192Qual Score Context 56%
Integration Complexity
Qualitative
ROI/NRI after 10 years
Balanced Project Scorecard
Future Software Cost Avoidance
Customer Satisfaction
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 26 of 42
Data Collection - Project Development
Cost and Schedule Data is collected and stored throughout the Project Lifecycle
– Capture the pre-kickoff baseline data– Establish reporting cycles for capturing
data iterations– Process Data for status and performance
analyses
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 27 of 42
Project Schedule Status
Schedule data captured in database
Summary Status charts created for Project Dashboard
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 28 of 42
Project Cost Performance
Shows Planned vs. Actual Cost Performance
Burn-down Chart shows Baseline Cost-to-complete over time and Actual Costs
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 29 of 42
Project Schedule Performance Metrics
Provides Performance Indices for Schedule Tasks much like EVM indices
Compares two iterations of the Project’s schedule
Measures actual progress against planned progress during interval between schedules
Identifies Schedule items that need attention
Provides Projected Task Duration based on measured performance
EXAMPLE
Name Start Finish DurationPercent
CompleteStart Slip
Finish Slip PDWS PDWP ADWP SV SPI SCPI
Old Duration
Projected Duration
Task 1 1-Jan-00 12-Jan-00 12 100% 0 2 10 10 12 0 1 0.834 12 12Task 2 5-Jan-00 14-Jan-00 10 80% 0 0 10 8 10 -2 0.8 0.8 10 10.5Task 3 8-Jan-00 17-Jan-00 10 70% 0 0 8 7 8 -1 0.875 0.875 10 10.43Task 4 14-Jan-00 18-Jan-00 5 0% 0 0 2 0 2 -2 0 0.715 5 7
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 30 of 42
Project Excursions (What-Ifs)
Program Management must handle many pressures to control projects due to Budget Cuts Project Overruns Multiple Projects Competing for limited Funds
Cost Analytics must support Schedule Excursions Budget Constraint Excursions
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 31 of 42
Web Framework Status
There is a CxP MOP CADRe Database on an MOD Network Server
The Web UI to the MOP CADRe DB can be used to Import and Export data
CxP MOP users can request access to the Web UI
CxP MOP users can be authorized to access to the Web UI
The SEER-SEM tool runs on user request to create Software Development Estimates
The new Database Schema for Schedule Based Cost Data has been defined
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 32 of 42
Desktop Framework Status
Developed Primarily as an Analytics Tool Development Platform
The UI supports multiple database instances
Tools exist to Import Schedule Based Cost Data Export Cost Data Spreadsheets Update CADRe data from Project Schedules Create Schedule Performance Status Create a Milestone Excursion ACEIT model data Perform Budget Constraint Analyses
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 33 of 42PRT 114 03 January 2012
Thank YouTony Harvey ([email protected])
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 34 of 42
Backup
CADRe Submission to HQ
Detailed Process Flow Charts
Multi-Layered Management Concept
Detailed Business Case Results
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 35 of 42
1
ProgramPhases
Formulation Implementation
AO-DrivenProjects
TraditionalWaterfall
Development or Directed
Missions
Flight ProjectsLife Cycle
Phases
Pre-Phase A:ConceptStudies
Phase A:Concept
Development
Phase B:
Preliminary Design
Phase C:
Detailed Design
Phase D:Fabrication,
Assembly & Test
Phase E:Operations &Sustainment
Phase F:Disposal
CR
2
1
Select Step 2
DownSelect Step 1
CDR Launch
3
3
4
4
LegendGPMC Mission Decision Review/ICR
All parts of CADRe due 30 days after site review
CADRe delivered; based on Concept Study Report (CSR) and winning proposal
4 CADRe, All Parts90 days after launch,as built or as deployed configuration
CADRe, Part C only duringlast year of planned project life
3 Update as necessary30 days after CDR
1
2
5
5
5
1a
CADRe update, if necessary
2
CADRe update, if necessary
1 1a
2a
2a
2a1
All parts of CADRe due 30 days after site review
NASA HQ requires CADRe submissions 5 times in a project’s life
PDRSDR
When is CADRe Data Required?
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 36 of 42
Project Process Details
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 37 of 42
Program Management Detail
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 38 of 42
Multi-Layered Management Concept
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 39 of 42
Project Cost Profile
Provides statement of Resource Requirements over time Total Cost per BCC By Tasks using WBS
Shows Cost Breakdown over time Collect CADRe Data at Detailed Level Identify Summary WBS Items in Detailed Data
By Activity Type Shows cost separated by Development, Modification, and Sustaining
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$1,800
$2,000
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
RY
$, M
Task I Task II Task III Task IV Task V
Source Data Type
Activity Type Cost Type FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
SW Dev FTE - - - - - - SW Mod FTE - - - - - - SW Sus FTE - - - - - - SW Dev EP 17.49 8.72 - - - - SW Mod EP - 3.87 7.74 7.71 3.85 - SW Sus EP - 0.51 1.03 1.03 0.51 - LOE Dev FTE 1.00 0.50 - - - - LOE Mod FTE - - - - - - LOE Sus FTE - 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 - LOE Dev EP - - - - - - LOE Mod EP - - - - - - LOE Sus EP - 5.00 10.00 10.00 5.00 - Trav Dev Travel $319.91 $165.10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00Trav Mod Travel $0.00 $1,807.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00Trav Sus Travel $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,736.13 $0.00Mat Dev Material $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00Mat Mod Material $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00Mat Sus Material $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 40 of 42
ROI Chart
Shows Costs vs. Savings Per BCC
Calculate Savings From CADRe Detailed Cost Data “Replaceable” Costs
Costs that will occur if Project is NOT performed Costs that will be replaced if Project IS performed
As Costs change ROI can be Re-Calculated
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 41 of 42
Project Scorecard
Provides Qualitative Rating
Final Score can be used for Option comparison
Identical to current BCC scorecard With textual rating
drop-down lists
Data provided by Project team and stored in DB
Quantitative Cost Savings $381,000
Category Rating ScoreReuse >80% 27Extensibility Med 9
ReusabilityMultiple Groups 9
Flexibility Significant 15Standards Compliant 27Ops Need Mandatory 45
Ops ScopeMultiple Groups 9
$ Avoidance Med 15
Accessibility Some 12Security Low 18TouchPoints Med 6
192Qual Score Context 56%
Integration Complexity
Qualitative
ROI/NRI after 10 years
Balanced Project Scorecard
Future Software Cost Avoidance
Customer Satisfaction
Quantitative Cost Savings 10 yr ROI $381,000 $381,000 $381,000
Option 1 Option 2 Option 3Reuse >80% < 10% 30-40%Extensibility Med High LowReusability Multiple Groups Limited Use Throughout MODFlexibility Significant Complete LittleStandards Compliant Non-standard LittleOps Need Mandatory Nice to have Big benefitsOps Scope Multiple Groups Limited Use Throughout MOD$ Avoidance Med None LowAccessibility Some Restricted Not restrictedSecurity Low High LowTouchPoints Med Med MedNumerical Score 192 57 141Qual Score Context 56% 17% 41%
Qualitative CriteriaQualitative
ScoresFuture
Software Cost Avoidance
Customer Satisfaction
Integration Complexity
PRT 114 03 January 2012 Approved For Public Release 42 of 42
Project Schedule/ Milestone Chart
Provides Summary Schedule Data
Schedule Data is collected in CADRe data
CADRe data can be updated from Project Schedule
CADRe data identifies Summary Schedule items
Milestone Chart created from Project Schedule data held in the CADRe data