30
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di M ilano 1 Communication in the Era of Globalization

Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 1

Communication in the Era of Globalization

Page 2: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 2

Paolo VolontéSociologia dei processi culturali

Politecnico di [email protected]

http://paolovolonte.wordpress.com

Page 3: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 3

Communication in the Era of Globalization

Today:What Does it Mean To Communicate?

Page 4: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 4

What does it mean to communicate?

Page 5: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 5

The exchange of ideas, information, etc. between two or more persons. In an act of communication there is usually at least a speaker or sender, a message which is transmitted, and a person or persons for whom this message is intended (the receiver).

Communication

Page 6: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 6

Page 7: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 7

Page 8: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 8

Page 9: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 9

Page 10: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 10

Page 11: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 11

Jakobson’s diagram

Page 12: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 12

My suggestion

Page 13: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 13

The “hydraulic model” of communication

Page 14: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 14

Page 15: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 15

The hydraulic model of communication

Page 16: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 16

The hydraulic model of communication

Page 17: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 17

The process that occurs when ideas, information and feelings are conveyed between individuals or groups of individuals for deliberate purposes. (Buguley 1994)

Communication

Page 18: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 18

A process of transmitting and receiving verbal or non-verbal messages that produces a response (Murphy and Hildebrandt 1991)

Communication

Page 19: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 19

The hydraulic model of communication(Roman Jakobson)

Page 20: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 20

The hydraulic model of communication(Paul Watzlawick)

Page 21: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 21

The two main assumptions of the hydraulic model

1. A “message” exists in itself as something independent from an experiencing subject, it holds its own meaning intrinsically, its “true meaning”.

2. Messages – thanks to this characteristic – can be “passed on” from somebody to someone else, or “shared” among two or more subjects.

Page 22: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 22

sender ------ receiver message ------

code

channel

context

Criticism of the first assumption

Page 23: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 23

BURRO

Page 24: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 24

Only getting into a specific context and referring to a specific context any message acquires the faculty of communicating.

There is no “objective” context. A context is always from the point of view of an observer.

Criticism of the first assumption

Page 25: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 25

Page 26: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 26

Only getting into a specific context and referring to a specific context any message acquires the faculty of communicating.

Criticism of the first assumption

What is the experience context of a specific observer? The current experience he is doing here and now from his own point of view; His/her body of memories, imagination, dreams; The whole heritage of experiences he/she has “embodied” in the course of time; He/she isn’t aware any more of them, but they keep on affecting his/her behaviour and choices; Values, tastes.

Page 27: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 27

Only getting into a specific context and referring to a specific context any message acquires the faculty of communicating.

Criticism of the first assumption

The “content” of a message, the “meaning” of a word or an image, the “sense” of an everyday life situation rise only when the message, the word, the situation get as new features into the experience horizon of somebody.

Page 28: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 28

Principle:

No kind of mental content can “pass on”, nor can “be shared” by two different minds, since any experience of the mind of the other can be gained only through the mediation of events occurring in the external field of perception: for instance, alterations occurring on the perceived body of the Other.

Criticism of the second assumption

Page 29: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 29

Page 30: Global Comm. section 2 (1 of 3)

Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 30

The “hydraulic model” of communication