16
Experiences of CMS selection Tristan Roddis, Cogapp Jeff Strickland, Metropolitan Museum of Art Christopher Borkowski, Balboa Park Online Collaborative Steve Norris, Cogapp MCN 2011

Experiences of CMS selection

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Slides from our presentation at the Museum Computer Network conference 2011.See http://www.mcn.edu/2011/experiences-cms-selection for full details

Citation preview

Page 1: Experiences of CMS selection

Experiences of CMS selection

Tristan Roddis, CogappJeff Strickland, Metropolitan Museum of ArtChristopher Borkowski, Balboa Park Online CollaborativeSteve Norris, Cogapp

MCN 2011

Page 2: Experiences of CMS selection

CMS selection: National Portrait Gallery, LondonSteve Norris, Cogapp

Page 3: Experiences of CMS selection

CMS - ChallengesLimited budgetMigration from static siteIntegration with existing systemsEase of use

Page 4: Experiences of CMS selection

CMS - Important Criteria Simple to use and administer

Microsites

Simplicity of development

Workflow & Permissions

Open Source

Page 5: Experiences of CMS selection

CMS - Selection ProcessResearch on candidatesRequirements listPriority orderShort list (5)Present to NPGDemo installations

Recommendation

Page 6: Experiences of CMS selection

NPG Short List

DrupalJoomlaMamboMODxPlone

Page 7: Experiences of CMS selection

The Good

Speed of developmentIntuitive CMS interfaceFlexibility (chunks, snippets)Customizability

Page 8: Experiences of CMS selection

The Bad

Immature (in 2008)Upgrade cycle (Evolution vs Revolution)Limited 3rd party modulesLack of versioningSimplistic workflowCode stored in database

Page 9: Experiences of CMS selection

CMS selection: Metropolitan Museum of ArtTristan Roddis, Cogapp; Jeff Strickland, MMA

Page 10: Experiences of CMS selection

CMS - Challenges Many voicesIntegration with existing systemsEcosystemLegacy contentFuture systems

Page 11: Experiences of CMS selection

CMS - Important Criteria CMS User Experience

Developer Experience

Workflow & Permissions

Versioning

Commercial / Open Source

Training, Documentation, Support

Page 12: Experiences of CMS selection

CMS - Selection Process Requirements specificationPeer review (15)Long list (20)Research on long listVendor questionnaireShort list (5)Presented to MMAFinal twoUse case demos

Recommendation

Page 13: Experiences of CMS selection

MMA Short List

SitecoreOpenTextUmbracoN2SharePoint 2010

Page 14: Experiences of CMS selection

The Good

Vendor training and supportRegular upgrade cycleNice CMS interface

Clean separation of content and presentationExtensibleFuture preview, multi-lingual, in-context editing, CEP...

Page 15: Experiences of CMS selection

The Bad

Dependence on hierarchyCan be tricky for team development (without TDS)Complicated and complexBlinking cursorHard to unit testDocumentation holesBundled third-party modules

Page 16: Experiences of CMS selection

Questions?

Picture credits:

NPG interior 1: Herry LawfordNPG interior 2: Xixi Lao

NPG exterior: Wikipedia user: HamMet exterior: Wikipedia user: fcb981