Estrategias basadas en la interoperabilidad para la

incorporación de contenidos a repositorios:

el Grupo SONEX y el Proyecto UK RepositoryNet+

Pablo de Castro, GrandIR – pcastro@grandir.comPeter Burnhill, EDINA National Data Centre – p.burnhill@ed.ac.uk

How it all started: Institutional Repositories Workshop (IRW’09)

http://repinf.pbworks.com/Repository-handshake

http://sonexworkgroup.blogspot.com/

SONEX are…

As of Nov'09 the workgroup coordinator Pablo de Castro changed affiliation from Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) to Carlos III University Madrid, and Richard Jones (Symplectic Ltd) became a member of the group in Apr'10 replacing Jim Downing.

Section 1: On SONEX work

• Began with interoperability deposit opportunity as the priority

• Take the multi-authored, multi-institution research paper as default

• Review existing deposit projects

• Develop use case analysis

• Key was think not have to do the work ourselves: think tank that helped form framework and language

• JISC then acted to commission a set of deposit projects along SONEX identified deposit worklines

How SONEX fits into the JISC Deposit Programme

SONEX: Scholarly Output Notification and Exchange

• The goal: populating (then) nearly-empty repositories - focus on research papers (the multi-authored, multi-institution default case study)

• The procedure: an international think-tank with own institutional activity in the area and international connections to running projects

- Identifying deposit opportunities as deposit use cases- The group philosophy: not a coding project (not even

a project) - "no power, no responsibility" - because of that we had influence and language

The SONEX paper: deposit-related interoperability in a nutshell

http://hdl.handle.net/10016/9257

SONEX usecase-based interop analysis

SONEX usecase scenario I: publisher-driven deposit

OA-RJ workflow PEER workflow

SONEX usecase scenario I: publisher-driven deposit

SONEX usecase scenario II: CRIS/IR integration

(from: “KE CRIS-OAR [publication metadata] interoperability project” presentation, CRIS2010 Aalborg,

Denmark, June 2-5, 2010)

(Potential) SONEX usecase scenario V: are IRs a proper target for research data deposit?

March 2010: JISC Deposit call released

JISC Deposit call projects: DepositMO

JISC Deposit call projects: RePosit

JISC Deposit call projects: JISC DURA

http://jisc-dura.blogspot.com/2010/08/ir-cris.html

JISC Deposit call projects: JISC DURA

http://www-library.ch.cam.ac.uk/open_access_publishing

JISC Deposit call projects: Kultivate

http://lanyrd.com/2011/kultivate-july-2011/sfpqw/

http://www.rsp.ac.uk/grow/measuring-success/

Measuring success of strategies to promote deposit

• Measuring success for particular deposit strategies: much harder than getting a general picture

• Specific questions should be asked to repository managers, such as: - was any given automated deposit strategy used for content ingest purposes? - could an approximate amount of items thus ingested be estimated as a percentage of total item input?

http://grandirblog.blogspot.com.es/2012/03/creciente-adopcion-de-cerif-como.html

And in the meantime, outside JISC Deposit programme…

SHERPA RoMEO involved in CRIS/IR

End of section 2: Deposit projects

SONEX Extension to Research Data Mgt

• SONEX commissioned by the JISC to perform a similar analysis on RDM

• Same JISC programme architecture: the JISC MRD Programme

What SONEX does for JISC MRD