Upload
ilri
View
968
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation by Alan Duncan, Kebebe Ergano, Aberra Adie and Abate Tedla at the FAP End of Project Workshop, Luang Prabang, Laos, 15-19 November 2010
Citation preview
Enhancing livelihoods of poor livestock keepers through increasing use of fodder: Ethiopia Report on Output 1
Mechanisms for strengthening and/or establishing multi-stakeholder alliances that enable scaling up and out of fodder technologies
Fodder Adoption Project (FAP) (IFAD Technical Assistance Grant 853)
Presentation by Alan Duncan, Kebebe Ergano, Aberra Adie and Abate Tedla at the FAP End of Project Workshop, Luang Prabang, Laos, 15-19 November 2010
Output 1. Mechanisms for strengthening and/or establishing multi-stakeholder alliances that enable scaling up and out of fodder technologies
Activity 1 - Identification of project sites, partners and work plans
FAP sites in Ethiopia
AtsbiAlamata
Ada’a
Mieso
Site characteristicsTigray Oromiya
Atsbi Alamata Ada’a Mieso
Altitude Highland Lowland Highland Lowland
NR Poor Fair Good Very poor
Farming system
C+LS C+LS C+LS Pastoral andAgro-pastoral
Livestock products
Small ruminant fattening + Butter
Dairy+LR fattening
Dairy + LR fattening
Small and large ruminant fattening + dairy
Annual rainfall
642 mm 831 mm 839 mm 790 mm
Water availability
Scarce Irrigation Irrigation Scarce
Market access High Moderately high
Very high High
Variation in agro-ecology, farming system, key livestock commodities and market access
Site characteristics influencing success
Site Subjective success score
Market pull
Diversity of actors
“Chemistry” with key actors
Food insecurity
Proximity
Atsbi * *** * * ** *
Alamata
** ** * ** ** **
Ada’a **** **** *** *** * ****
Mieso *** ** * ** *** ***
Other site selection lessons
Piggy-backing on IPMS sites – useful at start, not so useful at the end – attribution issues
Too many?Lack of strong national research
partners close to sitesConnections with IFAD
investment projects not obvious
Establishment of stakeholder platforms – the core partnership mechanism of FAP Ethiopia
Guiding principles that evolved :– Marriage of technology introduction and
enhanced networking. Focus on networks but don’t shy away from supplying knowledge as appropriate
– Careful judgement on how involved to get at site level – less and less as project progressed – devolution of responsibility in final year
Forages as an entry point – farmer numbers
Forages as an entry point – areas planted (ha)
11
Seedsourced
44 farmers plant on
own fields
X-bred cows sourced
Farmers purchase
seed
60 farmers plant on
own fields
Milk transport issues voiced
May 2008
Dec 2009
Institutional innovationTechnical innovation
Innovation processes in Ada’a Ethiopia
Fodder options
identified
FAP
IPMS Ministry (extension)
NARSFAP
IPMS Ministry (extension)
NARS
Farmers
Dairy co-op formed
FAP
IPMS Ministry (extension)
NARS
Ethiopian Meat & Dairy
Tech Inst.
Eden FieldSeeds
Land o Lakes
Farmers
IPMS Ministry (extension)
NARS
Ethiopian Meat & Dairy
Tech Inst.
Eden FieldSeeds
Land o Lakes
FAPMilk transport negotiations
ongoing
FAP
IPMS Ministry (extension)
NARS
FAP
Eden FieldSeeds
Land o Lakes
Ada’a Dairy Co-op
Crop Growplc
Godino DairyCo-op
Farmers
IPMS Ministry (extension)
NARSEthiopian Meat & Dairy
Tech Inst.
Eden FieldSeeds
Land o Lakes
Ada’a Dairy Co-op
Crop Growplc
Godino DairyCo-op
Meeting log
Attendance fairly consistent
Some actors always there, some on a needs basis
Date Actors FA
POoAR
D
IPMS
Land
O' lakes
DZAR
C
Eden
Field
Seed
enterprise
EMDTI
Ada Dai
ry Co-op
Farmer
s
Crop
Grow
Ada Coop
Promotion Office
Godin
o dair
y coo
p
ALPPI
S
12/02/2008 * * *
16/12/08 * *
07/10/2008 * * * * * * *
13/01/2009 * * *
14/01/2009 * * * * * * *
23/02/2009 * * * * * * * *
13/03/09 * * * * *
04/01/2009 * * * * *
04/03/2009 * * *
15-16/04/2009 * * * * *
22/04/09 * * * * *
23/04/09 * * *
05/10/2009 * *
07/08/2009 * * * *
29-31/07/2009 * * * * *
15-16/09/09 * * * *
18/08/2009 * *
27/08/2009 * * *
15-16/09/2009 * * * *
17/9/09* * * * * * * * * *
10/03/2009 * * * * * * * * *
10/07/2009
28/10/09 * * * * * *
10/09/2009 * * * * * * *
29/10/2009 * * * * * * *
11/10/2009* * * * * *
12/08/2009 * * * * * * * * *
02/10/2010 * * *
15–21/02/2010* * *
23 – 26/03/ 2010* * * * *
04/08/2010 * * * * *
20-29/04/2010 * * * *
22-27/05/2010 * * * * * *
29/05/2010 * * * * * * *
8-10/06/2010* *
Format of “innovation log”Date IS changes
Source documen
t
New actors
Change to linkages
Change in Behaviour
Change in Context
12/02/2008
16/12/08
07/10/2008
13/01/2009
14/01/2009
Activity 2 - Evaluation of actors, linkages, practices and habits related to fodder innovations
A formal diagnosis of innovation capacity at the 4 Ethiopian learning sites was conducted.
A draft manuscript has been produced
Innovation diagnosis findings
Dominant role of govt. line departments– Positive: well developed infrastructure
and reach– Negative: under-resourced, high
turnover, technology push culture
Lack of effective institutional arrangements for input supply– Fodder planting material– Cross-bred cows
Innovation diagnosis findings
Extension service providers lack the skills to provide innovation support services and manage innovation processes.
Research organizations do not currently proactively network with development practitioners and market actors.
Action post-diagnosis
Establishment of stakeholder groups at learning sites to:– Enhance multi-actor interactions– Build capacity in stakeholder
interactions– Provide a forum for farmers to
express demand and for stakeholders to respond
Activity 3 - Development of Geographical Information
Systems on pilot sites in relation to fodder interventions
As originally conceived there was very little activity in this area
Why..? Agro-ecological conditions not ultimately regarded as the main issue in relation to forage adoption
Activity 4 - Evaluation of livestock market environment influencing
fodder demand, access and utilisation
Rapid market appraisals on fodder as a commodity were undertaken by Ethiopian regional research partners in Tigray and Oromia Regions this year. – Tigray study: nascent but
developing fodder market; rapidly rising prices; increased farmer-to-farmer exchange of fodder
Indicative fodder prices in study sites
Hailesellassie Amare et al, unpublished
Seasonal fodder market survey
Collecting data on fodder prices and quality on monthly basis at 3 fodder markets in Oromiya Region of Ethiopia (Chancho, Debre Zeit, Mieso)
Data collection started in July 09 and will continue to the end of the project
Seasonal fodder market data
Markets: what would be done differently next time?
We should have done more work on markets for key livestock commodities
Key messages Need to link practical technical options and
pro-active focus on stakeholder networks Practical technical options, in our case
planted fodder, is the engine that drives stakeholder interest and action – without this stakeholder platforms have limited momentum. Need to avoid purely technology push or purely stakeholder networking – it is the combination that leads to change.
Need to allow agenda to move wider than initial entry point: fodder -> marketing, health, breed issues – this is good!