Upload
simon-coles
View
787
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A presentation on the real-world experiences of Electronic Signatures. Delivered at the Scientific Archivists Group conference in Nice, 2nd May 2014.
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Electronic Signatures What happens in Practice
Simon Coles CTO & Co-Founder
Amphora Research Systems
1
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Electronic Signatures
• Signature Technology
• Long Term Considerations
• Robustness
• Humans
• Processes
2
http://www.amphora-research.com/
A Little About Me
• So you can understand my perspective, experience and biases
• Started working with Electronic Laboratory Notebooks in 1996
• Active in CENSA at the time
3
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Amphora
• Solutions which Focus on
• the Capturing (from busy scientists)
• and Preserving (in complex environments)
• of Evidence (for use in court)
• about Scientific Activity (in Discovery)
• generally for Patent purposes
• Note: GxP is not a huge part of this
4
Representative Customers
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Differences are Interesting
• Diverse Customer Base
• We have some of the largest “ELN” deployments in the world
• We have some of the smallest
• But all have the same problem
• Same technology
• Same outcome
• Very different approach required
6
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Large companies
• Have in-house records/archive expertise
• We’re a competent technology partner
• Often will mediate with IT departments
• We often help with the long view
• Large companies are not immune to pain
• But the incentives are sometimes short term
• Unusually for a technology supplier we’re taking decades-long view
7
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Smaller companies • No in-house expertise
• No real appetite or money to do things “Properly” for the sake of it - need to demonstrate fast ROI
• We embed best practice in a robust offering
• Buy and do what it tells you
• Often SaaS
• Often a limited runway to prove a concept to get more investment gives these companies a very near-term focus
8
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Signature Technology
• Good systems all use the same technology
• RSA, DSA, Elliptic Curve, SHA512 hashes etc.
• The underlying algorithms are well proven, with lots of implementations, and free
• If anyone claims to have some secret sauce – run away, fast
• Beware: Some vendors are shockingly bad at this stuff
9
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Signature Technology
• Not going to go into any more detail on the technology side
• Would take more time than we have
• Probably wouldn’t remember it
• Not all that interesting
• Wikipedia is excellent!
10
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Long Term Considerations
• Technology: Violently agree with Peter from Phlexglobal
• PDF/A, XML, Multiple Copies, Bit-level integrity checking
• But: Signatures in XML format, nothing proprietary or binary
• Integrity checking
• Regular and routine
• Use a different implementation of signature algorithm
11
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Not just file formats• Also need to preserve supporting information
• Personally identifying information
• Processes and proof of compliance
• Need to ensure this all survives departure of
• The people
• The project
• The vendor
• The company
12
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Nothing is Forever
• We're doing an awful lot of corporate transition work
• e.g. splitting of repositories
• Or complex splitting of businesses
• Outsourcing of work is huge and interesting
• A lot of the long term records decisions have helped us out here
13
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Vendors and Longevity
• Looking back, focused niche companies are more reliable than larger composites
• You should have everything you need to protect and defend your records without a vendor
• IMHO this is your primary responsibility when purchasing on behalf of your company
• This is not in the vendors’ interests!
14
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Long Term Recommendations
• Make sure your archive is stand alone with no IT or other dependancies
• Can you identify people after they’ve left your company? Without access to HR records?
• Can you describe signature intent etc. without access to the specific SOP in place at that time?
15
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Long Term Recommendations
• Make sure you can access your records on your own
• e.g. file system
• You should be able to read with a standard PC & Software
• No Encryption
• No Compression except what’s in the PDF standard
16
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Robustness
• Signature systems run for a long time and their threat model is asymmetric
• Your system will produce millions of signatures
• One, at random, will get analysed in huge detail
• Designing for robustness is essential
17
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Technology is Bad
• Avoid technology where you can - it goes wrong
• Avoid two-factor authentication unless you really need it
• Avoid mixing risks and incentives
• You should be able to explain it to your Granny
18
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Integration Traps• IT seem to have an obsession with integrating
systems
• Vendor push?
• Need to be seen to getting value for money?
• Not always a good thing - adds complexity and risk
• Integrate for record acquisition/ingestion
• Make it easy, quick, and reliable
• Don’t depend on anything else for records preservation and defence
19
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Processes
• There's often a view that more is better
• That isn’t always the case
• Better something straightforward that’s done reliably
• Things change
• Simple processes survive the tests of time
20
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Process Example
• Detailed SOP
• Lots of information about what to put in a notebook
• Hence rarely read, seldom followed
• Setting yourself lots of traps
• Better
• “Write up your experiments…”
• “Sign them…”
21
http://www.amphora-research.com/
CROs and Others• This big/small company difference is evident with
CROs and other Partners
• Often there is a culture gap
• In our “Research Externalisation” work
• Yes there’s technology
• But there’s a large portion of cultural brokering
• Processes that work in big companies are often too heavy for smaller companies
22
http://www.amphora-research.com/
What Electronic Signatures are Really
About
23
http://www.amphora-research.com/
People
24
http://www.amphora-research.com/
What People Really Think
• Signing stuff (especially outside of GxP) is generally perceived to be a pain
• Make it quick and easy
• Gentle encouragement
• Remember you’ll need reporting to spot troubles
25
http://www.amphora-research.com/
People
• Yes there’s some technology
• Just as there was with paper
• Of course
• Pick your technology and vendor carefully
• Keep things straightforward and robust
• But you are designing a system which involves humans
26
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Working with People• The technology of Electronic Signatures is relatively easy
• Most of the hard stuff is about people
• And we are often working with people on the less articulate spectrum
• We use something called “Clean Language” which really really helps with this. Especially for highly technical people.
• Caitlin Walker pioneered this in Business
• She’s just written a book (I’m in the Chapter 3 case study)
• There’s a TED talk - YouTube “clean questions ted”
• Happy to discuss offline - very easy to demonstrate
27
http://www.amphora-research.com/
We’re Dentists!
• The effort is routine and ongoing
• The payoff is long term
• People know they should but… doesn’t always work out like that
• Our task is often thankless but always essential
28
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Summary• Good signature systems are simple
• Self-contained and depend on very little else to work properly
• Beware of technology
• Snake Oil vendors
• IT value for money complexity
• Design for Robustness
• Design for People
• Go to your dentist :-)
29
http://www.amphora-research.com/
Thank You
30