16
Data Quality: Success Generator or Failure Preventer? Presented by: Jos Schijns (OUNL) Co-author: Luc Schrover (Cendris)

Dmef2010 Dm Im Research Summit (Jos Schijns)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Business drivers for data quality and data maintenance services

Citation preview

Page 1: Dmef2010 Dm Im Research Summit (Jos Schijns)

Data Quality:

Success Generator or Failure Preventer?

Presented by: Jos Schijns (OUNL)

Co-author: Luc Schrover (Cendris)

Page 2: Dmef2010 Dm Im Research Summit (Jos Schijns)

Introduction

• Marketing today has become data (based) driven– Data used for decision making

• So, you should be sure that your data is of high quality

• However, data quality is not a ‘hot’ item• Besides, data quality seems to suffer from

cost savings / budget restrictions in times of recession

• Because (top) management often can’t see the poor quality of their data

Pagina 2

Page 3: Dmef2010 Dm Im Research Summit (Jos Schijns)

IntroductionThe circle of quality (Jim Harris)

Pagina 3

Source: http://www.ocdqblog.com/home/the-circle-of-quality.html

An organization’ssuccess is measured by the quality of itsresults…

…which are dependenton the quality of itsbusiness decisions ,,,

… which rely onthe quality of itsinformation …

…which is based onthe quality of its data!

Page 4: Dmef2010 Dm Im Research Summit (Jos Schijns)

Introduction

• So, data quality matters because high quality data serves as a solid foundation for business success– Circle of quality

• Data suppliers have to remind them!

Pagina 4

Page 5: Dmef2010 Dm Im Research Summit (Jos Schijns)

Problem Statement

• Why are companies willing to invest in data quality and data maintenance of their customer data(base)?

Pagina 5

Page 6: Dmef2010 Dm Im Research Summit (Jos Schijns)

Literature Review5 categories of business drivers

1. Failure preventer• Avoid inefficiencies in business processes and the very expensive rework efforts to

“fix” the failures made• E.g.: costs/expenses caused by delivery failures and returns through changes of

address2. Success generator

• Critical decisions based on poor-quality data can have serious consequences• E.g.: determine sales potentials, develop new markets or products, improve

conversion rates3. Image and positioning

• If the data is wrong, reputation can be lost• E.g.: damage caused by letters to deceased persons or incorrectly written

addresses4. Preventing customer irritation and dissatisfaction

• E.g.: as a result of duplicates and incorrect courtesy titles5. Meeting regulation and legislation

• To avoid penalties and fines

Pagina 6

Page 7: Dmef2010 Dm Im Research Summit (Jos Schijns)

Research Questions

• Which of these are (most) important to firms?

• Do they change over time?– Historically: failure preventer– Now (also): success generator?

Pagina 7

Page 8: Dmef2010 Dm Im Research Summit (Jos Schijns)

Research Method

• Webbased survey application (“CendrisMonitor”)– Reached by a link within the e-mail invitation

• Pre-test with 132 executives in B2B industry in the Netherlands

Pagina 8

Page 9: Dmef2010 Dm Im Research Summit (Jos Schijns)

Findings (1)

• From 5 theoretically based to 4 research based categories– Failure preventer– Success generator– Legislation and regulation– Customer focus/related (image and positioning;

customer irritation and dissatisfaction)

Pagina 9

Page 10: Dmef2010 Dm Im Research Summit (Jos Schijns)

Findings (2)

• Companies do have more than one business driver to assure customer data quality in the firm

Pagina 10

82,464,4 59,2 54,3

7,85,86,34,20102030405060708090

100

Customerfocus

Failurepreventer

Successgenerator

Regulation

%

Low (1-3) High (5-7)

Page 11: Dmef2010 Dm Im Research Summit (Jos Schijns)

Findings (3)

• Relations suggested, that need further support– (number of records X business drivers)

• (Large) companies, managing large databases are more likely to invest in DQ from a success generator point of view

– (type of industry X business driver) • Utilities and telco’s are more likely to be advocates

of the success generator point of view

Pagina 11

Page 12: Dmef2010 Dm Im Research Summit (Jos Schijns)

What we didn’t find (suggestions for further research)

• Besides the two relations suggested before that need further support

• Business driver X (unit/dept./person responsible for DQ)– Different people look at data differently– E.g. a marketing manager versus an IT

manager• Business driver X (#years of experience in

database marketing)

Pagina 12

Page 13: Dmef2010 Dm Im Research Summit (Jos Schijns)

Follow-up research

• Work in progress, a pre-test …• … that needs follow-up research:

– Test hypothesis in a cross-section survey– Explore changes in time– Compare across countries

Pagina 13

Page 14: Dmef2010 Dm Im Research Summit (Jos Schijns)

Conclusions

• Businesses are only as good as their data– Circle of quality

• More than one business driver for DQ– But they are not equally important

• A number of relationships that have to be investigated further

• Based on the research results, data suppliers and data maintenance service suppliers can help improve their customers’ performance

Pagina 14

Page 15: Dmef2010 Dm Im Research Summit (Jos Schijns)

For further information

Jos SchijnsOpen Universiteit in the NetherlandsSchool of ManagementNL-PO Box 29606401 DL HeerlenThe NetherlandsE: [email protected]

Pagina 15

Page 16: Dmef2010 Dm Im Research Summit (Jos Schijns)

“When data is abundant, but data quality remains scarce, then the thirst to acquire knowledge and insight remains unquenched, and data hangs like a heavy albatross around the enterprise’s neck”

– Jim Harris (2010)

Pagina 16